Next Article in Journal
Removal of a Recurrent Calvarial Hemangioma Followed by Autologous Iliac Crest Bone Reconstruction: A Case-Based Experience
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of COVID-19 on Universal Tumor Screening, Referral Rates and Attendance at Cancer Genetic Counseling at a Safety-Net University Hospital
Previous Article in Special Issue
Myelofibrosis: Treatment Options After Ruxolitinib Failure
 
 
Case Report
Peer-Review Record

From Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia to Plasmablastic Myeloma: Beyond the Usual Richter Transformation

Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(10), 550; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32100550
by Mathias Castonguay 1,2, Marie-France Gagnon 1,2, Alexandre Le Nguyen 1,2, Rafik Terra 1,2, Sarah-Jeanne Pilon 2,3, Guylaine Lépine 1, Richard LeBlanc 1,2, Jean Roy 1,2, Sandra Cohen 1,2, Isabelle Fleury 1,2, Luigina Mollica 1,2, Olivier Veilleux 1,2 and Jean-Sébastien Claveau 1,2,*
Reviewer 2:
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(10), 550; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32100550
Submission received: 26 August 2025 / Revised: 21 September 2025 / Accepted: 28 September 2025 / Published: 30 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 2nd Edition—Haematological Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Management)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

1: Include a paragraph or 2 to outline why secondary malignancies are likely in patients with CLL/SLL as part of discussion

2: include a paragraph on secondary malignancies associated with BTK inhibitors as part of discussion.

3: IgA associated myelomas are usually poorly differentiated and/or aggressive, as observed in this patient. Could you show a graphic evidence of clonal relationship between the CLL and the myeloma?

4: Could this patient have had a prior MGUS before the CLL?

Author Response

Reviewer 1

 

  1. Include a paragraph or 2 to outline why secondary malignancies are likely in patients with CLL/SLL as part of discussion

 

Response: A paragraph was added in the discussion (lines 184-194, 212-215).

 

  1. Include a paragraph on secondary malignancies associated with BTK inhibitors as part of discussion.

 

Response: A paragraph was added in the discussion (lines 186-190).

 

  1. IgA associated myelomas are usually poorly differentiated and/or aggressive, as observed in this patient. Could you show a graphic evidence of clonal relationship between the CLL and the myeloma?

 

Response: I apologize, but we were unable to provide graphical evidence of the clonal relationship. Clonality was demonstrated by identifying the same IGHV V and J sequences in both the CLL and PBM samples (now specified at line 148).

 

  1. Could this patient have had a prior MGUS before the CLL?

 

Response: No serum electrophoresis or light chain essay was performed prior to transformation unfortunately.

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors
  1. The authors report the first case of CLL evolving into plasmablastic myeloma (PBM). If so, I’s odd to conclude (in the Conclusions section) “ ….., with most patients succumbing within …” since this is the only case.
  2. This is a well-illustrated case. However, a single case does not warrant a new classification of plasmablastic RT as a distinct entity. More similar cases are definitely needed. The wording should be revised.
  3. Please italicize all the names of genes in the text.
  4. For Figure 2, a high-power cytology showing the plasmablastic cells might be more useful that Panels 2B (CD20-negative) and 2C (CD5-negative). If the authors prefer to keep Panels of CD5 and CD20, please add additional panel(s) of the marrow cytology. Figure 2E legends. The CD138 seems to be redundant.
  5. The author might cite the following review paper detailing the differential diagnosis lymphoid neoplasms with plasmablastic differentiation (plasmablastic lymphoma vs. plasmablastic myeloma). PMID: 31725418.

Author Response

Reviewer 2

 

  1. The authors report the first case of CLL evolving into plasmablastic myeloma (PBM). If so, I’s odd to conclude (in the Conclusions section) “ ….., with most patients succumbing within …” since this is the only case.

 

Response: We apologize for the misunderstanding. We were referring to lymphoproliferative neoplasms with plasmablastic morphology (namely plasmablastic lymphoma and plasmablastic myeloma). We have added this clarification in the revised manuscript. (line 225)

 

  1. This is a well-illustrated case. However, a single case does not warrant a new classification of plasmablastic RT as a distinct entity. More similar cases are definitely needed. The wording should be revised.

 

Response: We respectfully disagree with the reviewer. We believe that the documentation of one case of PBM and 15 cases of PBL supports considering plasmablastic lymphoproliferative disorders (PBM or PBL) as a distinct RT entity. Such a classification would facilitate better disease characterization and contribute to the development of improved treatment strategies.

  1. Please italicize all the names of genes in the text.

 

Response: Gene names are now italicized in the revised version of the manuscript.

 

  1. For Figure 2, a high-power cytology showing the plasmablastic cells might be more useful that Panels 2B (CD20-negative) and 2C (CD5-negative). If the authors prefer to keep Panels of CD5 and CD20, please add additional panel(s) of the marrow cytology. Figure 2E legends. The CD138 seems to be redundant.

 

Response: Figure 2 was updated accordingly.

 

  1. The author might cite the following review paper detailing the differential diagnosis lymphoid neoplasms with plasmablastic differentiation (plasmablastic lymphoma vs. plasmablastic myeloma). PMID: 31725418.

 

Response: We added the reference in the revised version.

Back to TopTop