Next Article in Journal
Artificial Intelligence for Cancer Detection—A Bibliometric Analysis and Avenues for Future Research
Previous Article in Journal
Multisite Quality Improvement Initiative to Identify and Address Racial Disparities and Deficiencies in Delivering Equitable, Patient-Centered Care for Multiple Myeloma—Exploring the Differences between Academic and Community Oncology Centers
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Current Oncology
Volume 30
Issue 2
10.3390/curroncol30020124
curroncol-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Tumor Suppressor p53 Down-Regulates Programmed Cell Death Protein 4 (PDCD4) Expression

by
William H. Yang
†,
Andrew P. George
†,
Chiung-Min Wang
,
Richard H. Yang
,
Avery M. Duncan
,
Darshti Patel
,
Zachery D. Neil
and
Wei-Hsiung Yang
*
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Mercer University School of Medicine, Savannah, GA 31404, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Curr. Oncol. 2023, 30(2), 1614-1625; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30020124
Submission received: 22 December 2022 / Revised: 19 January 2023 / Accepted: 25 January 2023 / Published: 27 January 2023
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The programmed cell death protein 4 (PDCD4), a well-known tumor suppressor, inhibits translation initiation and cap-dependent translation by inhibiting the helicase activity of EIF4A. The EIF4A tends to target mRNAs with a structured 5′-UTR. In addition, PDCD4 can also prevent tumorigenesis by inhibiting tumor promoter-induced neoplastic transformation, and studies indicate that PDCD4 binding to certain mRNAs inhibits those mRNAs’ translation. A previous study demonstrated that PDCD4 inhibits the translation of p53 mRNA and that treatment with DNA-damaging agents down-regulates PDCD4 expression but activates p53 expression. The study further demonstrated that treatment with DNA-damaging agents resulted in the downregulation of PDCD4 expression and an increase in p53 expression, suggesting a potential mechanism by which p53 regulates the expression of PDCD4. However, whether p53 directly regulates PDCD4 remains unknown. Herein, we demonstrate for the first time that p53 regulates PDCD4 expression. Firstly, we found that overexpression of p53 in p53-null cells (H1299 and Saos2 cells) decreased the PDCD4 protein level. Secondly, p53 decreased PDCD4 promoter activity in gene reporter assays. Moreover, we demonstrated that mutations in p53 (R273H: contact hotspot mutation, and R175H: conformational hotspot mutation) abolished p53-mediated PDCD4 repression. Furthermore, mutations in the DNA-binding domain, but not in the C-terminal regulatory domain, of p53 disrupted p53-mediated PDCD4 repression. Finally, the C-terminal regulatory domain truncation study showed that the region between aa374 and aa370 is critical for p53-mediated PDCD4 repression. Taken together, our results suggest that p53 functions as a novel regulator of PDCD4, and the relationship between p53 and PDCD4 may be involved in tumor development and progression.

1. Introduction

Cancer is one of the most dreaded and dangerous diseases of the 21st century for humans. Currently, the human cancer mortality rate is approximately 11–25%, according to Cancer Statistics on the NCI website (https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/understanding/statistics, 25 September 2020). The p53 gene, the 1993 Molecule of the Year, is a significant cellular regulator in human cancers, and its important role in response to DNA damage has been highlighted by the discovery that more than 50% of human cancers harbor p53 mutations [1]. In addition to mutations, the other major mechanism leading to the dysfunction of the TP53 gene is the downregulation of wild-type (WT) p53 by MDM2/MDM4 [2]. Throughout decades of studies, hundreds of p53 target genes have been identified so far, including p21, PUMA, GADD45, etc. [3,4,5]. As a transcription factor and tumor suppressor, p53 is regulated by several post-translational modifications, such as phosphorylation [6], acetylation [7], methylation [8], and SUMOylation [9], especially in the C-terminal regulatory domain. Recently, p53-dependent ferroptosis, an iron-dependent form of non-apoptotic cell death, has been linked to p53-mediated tumor suppression [10]. Overall, as the most studied protein, p53 regulates DNA repair [11], apoptosis [12], metabolism [13], autophagy [14], translation control [15], cell cycle arrest [16], and feedback mechanisms including the MDM2-p53 pathway [17].
The programmed cell death protein 4 (PDCD4), a well-known tumor suppressor, inhibits translation initiation and cap-dependent translation by inhibiting the helicase activity of EIF4A [18]. The EIF4A tends to target mRNAs with a structured 5′-UTR [19]. In addition, PDCD4 can also prevent tumorigenesis by inhibiting tumor promoter-induced neoplastic transformation [20], and studies indicate that PDCD4 may inhibit the translation of certain mRNAs via direct binding [21]. A previous study demonstrated that PDCD4 inhibits the translation of p53 mRNA [22], whose protein is a key regulator of the cell cycle and cell death. The inhibition of p53 is via an EIF4A-dependent mechanism. The study further demonstrated that treatment with DNA-damaging agents resulted in the downregulation of PDCD4 expression and an increase in p53 expression. The results suggest a potential mechanism by which p53 regulates the expression of PDCD4. Along with p53, PDCD4 inhibits the translation of many other genes (c-Myb, Bcl-xL, XIAP, Sin1, etc.) to prevent tumorigenesis [21,23,24,25]. Furthermore, the PDCD4 is highly conserved among vertebrates and is frequently downregulated in multiple different types of cancer, including colon [26], liver [27], breast [28], lung [29], pancreas [30], and more. However, whether p53 directly regulates PDCD4 remains unknown. Therefore, in this study, we assessed the role of p53 in regulating the expression of PDCD4. (Note: Part of the current study was previously presented at the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) annual meeting in 2021 and has been reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [31], 2021, AACR).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals and Reagents

Both cell culture medium and cell culture reagents were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). Antibodies against p53, PDCD4, FOXP2, YB-1, and β-Actin were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Antibodies against Caspase 3 and ERK1/2 were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology Inc. (Danvers, MA, USA). P53 siRNA (h) was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Luciferase activity was measured using the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA).

2.2. DNA Constructs

Human p53-pcDNA4 expression plasmid (with HIS tag) was generated by RT-PCR in the Yang lab. Two primers (5′- GGATCCACTAGTCatggaggagccgcag -3′ and 5′- CGGGCCCTCTAGACTCGAG tcagtctgagtcag -3′) were used to synthesize the human p53 fragment, which was then cloned into the expression vector pcDNA4. Human p53 mutant and truncated expression plasmids used in this study were created by PCR-based In-Fusion technology from WT p53-pcDNA4 expression plasmids (In-Fusion HD Cloning Kit, Takara Bio, San Jose, CA, USA). The human PDCD4 promoter (−242/+355 bp) Pgl4 plasmid was generated by PCR in the Yang lab. Two primers (5′- GAATGGGTGAGCTGGGTCGAGGAAGCATCATCCTCGTCCCCATC -3′ and 5′- AAGCTTTGCGGGGCTACAAGAAG -3′) were used to amplify the human PDCD4 promoter fragment. Plasmids containing the human PDCD4 promoter with the p53 response element (RE) mutant were created by PCR-based mutagenesis (QuikChange Lightning site-directed mutagenesis kit, Agilent/Strategene, La Jolla, CA, USA). All DNA plasmid constructs were verified by Sanger nucleotide sequencing.

2.3. Cell Culture and Transfection

The cell culture and transfection methods were carried out as previously described [32]. H1299 (CRL-5803), MCF7 (HTB-22), and Saos2 (HTB-85) cells were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA). The cells were grown/maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) with fetal bovine serum (10% for H1299 cells and 15% for Saos2 cells) and 1% Pen/Strep antibiotics (GIBCO/Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA) in a humidified incubator (5% CO2 at 37 ℃) and cultured for less than six months. Both cells were also routinely checked and confirmed negative for Mycoplasma contamination using a PCR detection kit (Millipore-Sigma, Burlington, MA, USA) throughout the study. After incubation, the cells were transfected with specific expression plasmids described in each assay using the Fugene HD Transfection Reagent (Roche, Madison, WI, USA). Forty-eight hours after transfection, the cells were harvested and lysed for use in promoter luciferase reporter assays or Western blot analysis.

2.4. PDCD4 Promoter Luciferase Reporter Assays

The reporter assays were carried out as previously described [32]. Cells were cultured in 24-well plates overnight and then transiently transfected with the PDCD4 promoter-firefly luciferase plasmid, the internal control pRL-TK plasmid (which encodes Renilla luciferase activity), and with or without p53 WT or mutant expression plasmids in the presence of Fugene HD Transfection Reagent (Roche, Madison, WI, USA). Forty-eight hours after transfection, the cells were harvested and lysed in a passive lysis buffer (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Luminescence was detected with the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System Kit (catalog no. E1960, Promega, Madison, WI, USA) using a luminometer (Turner Designs, Sunnyvale, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The firefly luciferase activity was normalized by calculating the ratio to Renilla luciferase activity. The relative luciferase activity was calculated as a fold change compared to the control groups. All experiments were performed three times in a triplicate setting.

2.5. Western Blot Analysis

The Western blot analysis was performed as previously described [32]. After 48 hours of transfection, cells were washed with ice-cold PBS and lysed with ice-cold 1X RIPA buffer supplemented with phosphatase inhibitors and protease inhibitors. The protein contents of the high-speed supernatant were determined using the BCATM Protein Assay Kit assay (Pierced/Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA). Equal amounts of protein (approximately 40 µg) were resolved on 8–10% polyacrylamide-SDS gels and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) by wet electrophoretic transfer. The membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat milk and probed with specific primary antibodies first and then with specific secondary antibodies. Antibodies were diluted in 5% dry milk powder in TBST (0.1% Tween-20/TBS) buffer. Blots were visualized using the Supersignal West Dura Extended Duration Substrate kit (Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, IL, USA). The intensity of the protein band was quantified by the ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA).

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis and comparisons were performed using the Student’s t-test to determine the statistical significance between groups. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant between groups.

3. Results

p53 Decreases PDCD4 Protein Level

In order to dissect the relationship between p53 and PDCD4, we first investigated the role of p53 in PDCD4 expression. We used H1299 (human lung epithelial cancer) and Saos2 (human osteosarcoma) cells to evaluate whether p53 affects PDCD4 protein expression since both cells express little to no endogenous p53. As shown in Figure 1A–D using H1299 cells, WT p53 induction by transient transfection decreased the expression levels of PDCD4. However, in R175H (a conformation hotspot mutant), p53 induction did not reduce PDCD4 expression, suggesting that disruption of p53 3D conformation and DNA binding activity leads to a loss of p53-mediated PDCD4 repression. A similar result was observed on Saos2 cells, as shown in Figure 1E. To confirm the results of Figure 1A-1E, we next knockdown p53 by the siRNA system in MCF7 cells (which express endogenous WT p53) to evaluate whether p53 affects PDCD4 expression. As shown in Figure 1F, the reduction of p53 by siRNA increased the expression levels of PDCD4. Several PDCD4 downstream targets have been reported, including YB-1 [33], Caspase 3 [34], and ERK1/2 [35] in different pathways. As shown in Figure 1D,F, the caspase 3 pathway seems the most important in the p53-PDCD4 axis. Overall, these findings indicate that p53 has the potential to down-regulate PDCD4 expression, and the p53-PDCD4-Caspase 3 axis likely is involved in the apoptosis pathway triggered by p53.
As p53 decreases PDCD4 protein expression, as shown in Figure 1, we next examined the effect of human p53 on PDCD4 promoter activation. The PDCD4 promoter (−242/+355 bp)-LUC reporter plasmid was co-transfected with the p53 expression plasmid into H1299 or Saos2 cells, and PDCD4 promoter activity was measured by quantifying the LUC activity in cell lysates 48 h after transfection. As shown in Figure 2A, the expression of p53 generated a decrease in the promoter activity of PDCD4 gene transcription in H1299 cells. As expected, p53 did not repress the pGL4 vector, which does not contain the PDCD4 promoter. Similar results were observed in Saos2 cells in Figure 2B. This finding indicates that p53 is a repressor of PDCD4 transcription independent of cell types.
In order to further confirm the result from Figure 1 and Figure 2, we next examined the effect of the human p53 hotspot mutations of cancer on the transcriptional activity of the PDCD4 promoter. H1299 cells were co-transfected with the PDCD4 promoter-LUC reporter plasmid and with either wild-type (WT), R273H (contact hotspot mutation), or R175H (a conformational hotspot mutation) p53 expression plasmid. As shown in Figure 3A, in H1299 cells, while the WT p53 repressed PDCD4 promoter activity as expected, the R273H and R175H p53 did not reduce PDCD4 promoter activity. Similar results were observed in Saos2 cells in Figure 3B, which suggests that proper DNA contact and structural conformation are critical for p53-mediated PDCD4 repression.
Additionally, to determine whether the p53 response elements (REs) are located and required for p53-mediated PDCD4 expression, we first searched for potential p53 binding site(s) on the PDCD4 promoter region. We identified two potential p53 binding sites in the human PDCD4 promoter regions based on the known repressing p53 RE sequence: RRXCXXGXYX-XRXCXXGXYY (X is A/T/C/G). Two potential p53 binding sites are located −238 to −208 bp upstream and +134 to +159 bp downstream of the transcription start site, which suggests that p53 may directly regulate PDCD4 transcription (Figure 4A). We next generated −238 to −208 bp mutant (GAGCTGGGTCGaggaagcttcATCCTCGTCC -> GAGAAAAGTCGaggaagcttcATCAAAATCC) (M1), +134 to +159 bp mutant (GGGGCCGGCTGaccagGAACCTGGGC -> GGGGAAAACTGacccagGAAAAAAGGGC) (M2), and a M1+M2 mutant that contains both M1 and M2 mutations. As shown in Figure 4B, either M1 or M2 mutations resulted in approximately 50% loss of p53-mediated PDCD4 promoter repression. Notably, mutations in both M1 and M2 dramatically reduced PDCD4 promoter activity (approximately 90% loss). Together, these results indicate that both REs are involved in p53-mediated PDCD4 repression.
Furthermore, to confirm the result from Figure 3, we next examined the effect of human p53 mutations in the DNA-binding domain and the C-terminal regulatory domain on the transcriptional activity of the PDCD4 promoter. H1299 cells were co-transfected with the PDCD4 promoter-LUC reporter plasmid and with either wild-type (WT), mutants of the DNA-binding domain (R248Q, R248W, R248QR249S, G245S, K291RK292R, R175H, R273H, R249S, R248C, R248G, R248P, V143A, V143L, and V143M), or mutants of the C-terminal regulatory domain (K368R, S392A, 6KR, D391AD393A) p53 expression plasmid. The 6KR mutant represents K370R+K372R+K373R+K381R+K382R+K386R. As shown in Figure 5, in H1299 cells, while the WT p53 and p53 C-terminal regulatory domain mutants repressed PDCD4 promoter activity, the majority of p53 DNA-binding domain mutants did not reduce PDCD4 promoter activity, except K291RK292R and V143L, which suggests that the DNA-binding domain is critical for p53-mediated PDCD4 repression.
In order to further determine the importance of the C-terminal domain of p53 on PDCD4 promoter activity, we next evaluated the effect of human p53 truncations in the C-terminal regulatory domain on the transcriptional activity of the PDCD4 promoter. H1299 cells were co-transfected with the PDCD4 promoter (−242/+355 bp)-LUC reporter plasmid and with either wild-type (WT) or various truncations of the C-terminal domain (Δ390–393, Δ386–393, Δ382–393, Δ378–393, Δ374–393, Δ372–393, and Δ370–393) p53 expression plasmids. As shown in Figure 6, in H1299 cells, while the WT p53 repressed PDCD4 promoter activity, the truncations of the p53 C-terminal domain (Δ372–393 and Δ370–393) resulted in the loss of p53-mediated PDCD4 promoter repression, which suggests that the sequence between aa374 and aa370 of p53 (which contains methylation and acetylation sites) is critical for p53-mediated PDCD4 repression.

4. Discussion

Within cells, the network of transcription factors coordinates regulating downstream target genes by responding to a great diversity of pathophysiological stimuli and thus plays a critical role in processing information for cells, including apoptosis/necrosis, cell growth and arrest, developmental control/management, metabolic regulation, pathogenesis, and reproduction [32,36,37,38]. Numerous syndromes and disorders, including autoimmune dysfunctions, cardiovascular diseases, metabolic disorders, cancers, and neurological diseases, can often be caused by mutations of transcription factors. [39,40,41]. The most studied protein and transcription factor in the world, p53, has many functions in apoptosis, senescence, cell cycle regulation, DNA repair, metabolism, redox control, genomic stability, and differentiation [42,43]. The mutations or deletions of the TP53 gene have been discovered in more than half of human malignancies [1,44]. Herein, we show for the first time that p53 acts as a transcriptional repressor of the human PDCD4 gene and subsequent PDCD4 protein in human cells.
It is well documented that PDCD4, a tumor suppressor, can suppress tumor proliferation and progression and is often down-regulated in many types of human cancer [45,46,47]. The hallmark of the biochemical function of PDCD4 is as an inhibitor of translation, such as by inhibiting the helicase activity of EIF4A. A previous report has shown that PDCD4 inhibits the translation of p53 mRNA by directly interacting with the 5′-UTR of p53 mRNA [22]. Furthermore, SKP2, an oncogene, promotes breast cancer tumorigenesis and radiation resistance through PDCD4 ubiquitination [48]. Once PDCD4 is ubiquitinated, it is consequently degraded by proteasomes. In the JB6 mouse model, PDCD4 has been shown to inhibit tumor promotion [49]. Moreover, in the PDCD4 knockout animal model, the PDCD4 knockout induces epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) [50]. However, the detailed mechanisms by which PDCD4 behaves as a tumor suppressor are still largely unknown. However, in the present work, we showed that p53 downregulates PDCD4 protein levels and decreases PDCD4 promoter activity. Our data highlights that PDCD4 is a novel target gene for the tumor suppressor p53. This information adds to the current knowledge that PDCD4 can be regulated at different levels of epigenetics, transcription, and post-translation, including phosphorylation and miRNA-21 regulation [51].
In addition to its role as an inhibitor of translation, PDCD4 can cooperate with several transcription factors to execute its-related regulation and its role in diseases. For example, PDCD4 can interact with (1) twist1 to inhibit YB-1 expression [33], (2) DAXX to inhibit DAXX-mediated HipK2 function [52], (3) PABP to inhibit translation [53], and (4) p65 to inhibit NF-kB-mediated function [54]. PDCD4 has also been shown to be involved in microglia activation [55], gastric cancer growth [56], apoptosis of placental trophoblasts via the miRNA-21-PDCD4 pathway [57], and cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury [58]. Since PDCD4 inhibits the translation of p53 mRNA [22], and the current study shows that p53 represses PDCD4 expression, it suggests that p53 and PDCD4 may have a regulatory loop between each other. Such a regulatory loop has been observed in the p53 and MDM2 loop: while p53 up-regulates MDM2 expression, MDM2 facilitates p53 degradation through ubiquitination [59]. However, whether PDCD4 can directly interact with p53 in a two-way feedback loop remains largely unknown. Further, extensive future studies are necessary to analyze this potential regulatory loop and its mechanism.
The post-translational modifications (PTMs) such as acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, SUMOylation, and ubiquitination influence a wide range of cellular activities, including neurological diseases, metabolism, and cancer development [60,61], especially breast cancer development. In addition, extensive studies demonstrate that human p53 can be modified by PTMs such as phosphorylation (S9, S15, T18, S20, S33, S37, S46, T55, S183, S269, T284, S315, and S392), acetylation (K120, K305, K321, K373, K381, and K382), ubiquitylation (K24, K291, and K292), SUMOylation (K386), and methylation (R333, R335, R337, K370, K372, K373, and K382) [62,63]. The C-terminal regulatory domain of p53 contains several PTM sites, which suggests that p53 is constantly regulated by dynamic PTM regulation. In the present work, we demonstrated that mutations in the DNA-binding domain abolish p53-mediated PDCD4 repression, including R248Q, R248W, R248QR249S, G245S, R175H, R273H, R249S, R248C, R248G, R248P, V143A, and V143M (Figure 5). This result is consistent with previous reports that the DNA-binding domain is critical for p53-mediated transcription [64]. Most mutations in the DNA-binding domain of p53 either disrupt p53’s 3D structure or interfere with p53-DNA contact at promoter regions. Furthermore, many mutations in the DNA-binding domain of p53 are shown in human cancers as “hotspot mutations.” Interestingly, in contrast to the DNA-binding domain, the mutations in the C-terminal regulatory domain of p53 still maintain p53’s ability to repress PDCD4 expression, including K368R, S392A, 6KR, and D391AD393A (Figure 5), which suggests that PTMs play a minor role in p53-mediated PDCD4 repression.
Additionally, both the N-terminal and C-terminal domains of p53 show an “intrinsic disorder” structure compared to the central regions (including the DNA-binding domain), which show a relatively ordered structure [65]. Using a truncation strategy on the C-terminal regulatory domain of p53, we showed that the region between aa370 and aa374 is required for p53-mediated PDCD4 promoter repression (Figure 6). This result is similar to the previous report [66], which shows that the C-terminal 30 amino acids of p53 are required for sequence-specific binding to p53 response elements. The first explanation is that truncation of the bell-shaped C-terminal domain disrupts p53’s ability to bind to the DNA of the promoter region, even if the C-terminal regulatory domain is relatively disordered in 3D structure. The second explanation is that the C-terminal regulatory domain of p53 has a positive regulatory function in sensing DNA response elements, as mentioned in the previous report [65]. The third possibility is that the sequence between aa374 and aa370 of p53 (which contains methylation and acetylation sites) is specifically essential for p53-mediated PDCD4 repression. However, future studies are necessary to dissect this potential regulatory mechanism in the C-terminal domain of p53.
The PDCD4 protein is heavily post-translationally modified by PTMs, especially phosphorylation (S25, S67, S68, S71, S76, S78, S94, Y152, S313, S317, and S457) [67]. During the current study, we intended to search the potential SUMOylation sites on PDCD4 since SUMOylation is one of the PTMs frequently found on tumor suppressors. However, our results suggest that PDCD4 is not likely to be modified by SUMOylation.
In conclusion, this study demonstrates that p53 is a novel repressor of the PDCD4 promoter and that the DNA binding domain and C-terminal regulatory domain (the region between aa370 and aa374) are critical for p53-mediated PDCD4 repression.

5. Conclusions

In summary, we show a novel relationship between p53 and PDCD4 for the first time. Our studies suggest that p53 is a novel repressor of the PDCD4 promoter and that the DNA binding domain and the region of aa370 to aa374 of the C-terminal regulatory domain are critical for p53-mediated PDCD4 repression. Overall, our findings add a new layer of information to our previous understanding of the p53/PDCD4 axis and its functions.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/curroncol30020124/s1, Supplementary Material: the original WB blots of figure 1, 2 and 6.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.H.Y., A.P.G. and W.-H.Y.; methodology, W.H.Y., A.P.G., C.-M.W., R.H.Y., A.M.D., D.P., Z.D.N. and W.-H.Y.; validation, W.H.Y., A.P.G. and W.-H.Y.; formal analysis, W.H.Y. and W.-H.Y.; investigation, W.-H.Y.; resources, W.-H.Y.; data curation, W.H.Y., A.P.G. and W.-H.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, W.H.Y. and W.-H.Y.; writing—review and editing, W.H.Y., A.P.G., C.-M.W., R.H.Y., A.M.D., D.P., Z.D.N. and W.-H.Y.; visualization, W.-H.Y.; supervision, W.-H.Y.; project administration, W.-H.Y.; funding acquisition, W.-H.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from a Mercer University Seed Grant (W.-H.Y.), The Landings Women’s Golf Association Scholars Program (A.P.G. and W.-H.Y.), and a Rubye Smith Research Grant (W.-H.Y.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Olivier, M.; Hollstein, M.; Hainaut, P. TP53 mutations in human cancers: Origins, consequences, and clinical use. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2010, 2, a001008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Duffy, M.J.; Synnott, N.C.; O’Grady, S.; Crown, J. Targeting p53 for the treatment of cancer. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2022, 79, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kim, E.M.; Jung, C.H.; Kim, J.; Hwang, S.G.; Park, J.K.; Um, H.D. The p53/p21 Complex Regulates Cancer Cell Invasion and Apoptosis by Targeting Bcl-2 Family Proteins. Cancer Res. 2017, 77, 3092–3100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Kim, J.; Yu, L.; Chen, W.; Xu, Y.; Wu, M.; Todorova, D.; Tang, Q.; Feng, B.; Jiang, L.; He, J.; et al. Wild-Type p53 Promotes Cancer Metabolic Switch by Inducing PUMA-Dependent Suppression of Oxidative Phosphorylation. Cancer Cell 2019, 35, 191–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Carrier, F.; Georgel, P.T.; Pourquier, P.; Blake, M.; Kontny, H.U.; Antinore, M.J.; Gariboldi, M.; Myers, T.G.; Weinstein, J.N.; Pommier, Y.; et al. Gadd45, a p53-responsive stress protein, modifies DNA accessibility on damaged chromatin. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1999, 19, 1673–1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Jenkins, L.M.; Durell, S.R.; Mazur, S.J.; Appella, E. p53 N-terminal phosphorylation: A defining layer of complex regulation. Carcinogenesis 2012, 33, 1441–1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Wang, S.J.; Li, D.; Ou, Y.; Jiang, L.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Gu, W. Acetylation Is Crucial for p53-Mediated Ferroptosis and Tumor Suppression. Cell Rep. 2016, 17, 366–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Durant, S.T.; Cho, E.C.; La Thangue, N.B. p53 methylation—The Argument is clear. Cell Cycle 2009, 8, 801–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Marcos-Villar, L.; Pérez-Girón, J.V.; Vilas, J.M.; Soto, A.; de la Cruz-Hererra, C.F.; Lang, V.; Collado, M.; Vidal, A.; Rodríguez, M.S.; Muñoz-Fontela, C.; et al. SUMOylation of p53 mediates interferon activities. Cell Cycle 2013, 12, 2809–2816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Liu, Y.; Gu, W. p53 in ferroptosis regulation: The new weapon for the old guardian. Cell Death Differ. 2022, 29, 895–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, Y.H.; Ho, T.L.F.; Hariharan, A.; Goh, H.C.; Wong, Y.L.; Verkaik, N.S.; Lee, M.Y.; Tam, W.L.; van Gent, D.C.; Venkitaraman, A.R.; et al. Rapid recruitment of p53 to DNA damage sites directs DNA repair choice and integrity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 119, e2113233119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Liu, F.; Li, X.; Yan, H.; Wu, J.; Yang, Y.; He, J.; Chen, J.; Jiang, Z.; Wu, F.; Jiang, Z. Downregulation of CPT2 promotes proliferation and inhibits apoptosis through p53 pathway in colorectal cancer. Cell Signal. 2022, 92, 110267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Loughran, R.M.; Emerling, B.M. Mechanistic roles of mutant p53 governing lipid metabolism. Adv. Biol. Regul. 2022, 83, 100839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Rahman, M.A.; Park, M.N.; Rahman, M.H.; Rashid, M.M.; Islam, R.; Uddin, M.J.; Hannan, M.A.; Kim, B. p53 Modulation of Autophagy Signaling in Cancer Therapies: Perspectives Mechanism and Therapeutic Targets. Front. Cell. Dev. Biol. 2022, 10, 761080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Harris, B.R.E.; Wang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Ferrari, M.; Okon, A.; Cleary, M.P.; Wagner, C.R.; Yang, D.Q. Induction of the p53 Tumor Suppressor in Cancer Cells through Inhibition of Cap-Dependent Translation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2018, 38, e00367-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Chen, J. The Cell-Cycle Arrest and Apoptotic Functions of p53 in Tumor Initiation and Progression. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2016, 6, a026104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Zafar, A.; Wang, W.; Liu, G.; Xian, W.; McKeon, F.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, R. Targeting the p53-MDM2 pathway for neuroblastoma therapy: Rays of hope. Cancer Lett. 2021, 496, 16–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Suzuki, C.; Garces, R.G.; Edmonds, K.A.; Hiller, S.; Hyberts, S.G.; Marintchev, A.; Wagner, G. PDCD4 inhibits translation initiation by binding to eIF4A using both its MA3 domains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 3274–3279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Andreou, A.Z.; Harms, U.; Klostermeier, D. Single-stranded regions modulate conformational dynamics and ATPase activity of eIF4A to optimize 5′-UTR unwinding. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, 5260–5275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Cmarik, J.L.; Min, H.; Hegamyer, G.; Zhan, S.; Kulesz-Martin, M.; Yoshinaga, H.; Matsuhashi, S.; Colburn, N.H. Differentially expressed protein Pdcd4 inhibits tumor promoter-induced neoplastic transformation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 14037–14042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Singh, P.; Wedeken, L.; Waters, L.C.; Carr, M.D.; Klempnauer, K.H. Pdcd4 directly binds the coding region of c-myb mRNA and suppresses its translation. Oncogene 2011, 30, 4864–4873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Wedeken, L.; Singh, P.; Klempnauer, K.H. Tumor suppressor protein Pdcd4 inhibits translation of p53 mRNA. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 42855–42862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Liwak, U.; Jordan, L.E.; Von-Holt, S.D.; Singh, P.; Hanson, J.E.; Lorimer, I.A.; Roncaroli, F.; Holcik, M. Loss of PDCD4 contributes to enhanced chemoresistance in Glioblastoma multiforme through de-repression of Bcl-xL translation. Oncotarget 2013, 4, 1365–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Liwak, U.; Thakor, N.; Jordan, L.E.; Roy, R.; Lewis, S.M.; Pardo, O.E.; Seckl, M.; Holcik, M. Tumor suppressor PDCD4 represses internal ribosome entry site-mediated translation of antiapoptotic proteins and is regulated by S6 kinase 2. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2012, 32, 1818–1829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Wang, Q.; Zhu, J.; Wang, Y.W.; Dai, Y.; Wang, Y.L.; Wang, C.; Liu, J.; Baker, A.; Colburn, N.H.; Yang, H.S. Tumor suppressor Pdcd4 attenuates Sin1 translation to inhibit invasion in colon carcinoma. Oncogene 2017, 36, 6225–6234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Long, J.; Yin, Y.; Guo, H.; Li, S.; Sun, Y.; Zeng, C.; Zhu, W. The mechanisms and clinical significance of PDCD4 in colorectal cancer. Gene 2019, 680, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Du, X.; Osoro, E.K.; Chen, Q.; Yan, X.; Gao, D.; Wu, L.; Ren, J.; Feng, L.; Wu, N.; Lu, K.; et al. Pdcd4 promotes lipid deposition by attenuating PPARα-mediated fatty acid oxidation in hepatocytes. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2022, 545, 111562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cai, Q.; Yang, H.S.; Li, Y.C.; Zhu, J. Dissecting the Roles of PDCD4 in Breast Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 855807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hwang, S.K.; Jeong, Y.J.; Chang, Y.C. PDCD4 inhibits lung tumorigenesis by the suppressing p62-Nrf2 signaling pathway and upregulating Keap1 expression. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2020, 10, 424–439. [Google Scholar]
  30. Ruan, Q.; Wang, T.; Kameswaran, V.; Wei, Q.; Johnson, D.S.; Matschinsky, F.; Shi, W.; Chen, Y.H. The microRNA-21-PDCD4 axis prevents type 1 diabetes by blocking pancreatic beta cell death. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 12030–12035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Yang, W.H.; George, A.P.; Yang, W.H.; Wang, C.M.; Yang, R.H. Abstract 2160: Tumor suppressor p53 down-regulates programmed cell death protein 4 (PDCD4) expression. Cancer Res. 2021, 81 (Suppl. S13), 2160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, C.M.; Yang, W.H.; Cardoso, L.; Gutierrez, N.; Yang, R.H.; Yang, W.H. Forkhead Box Protein P3 (FOXP3) Represses ATF3 Transcriptional Activity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 11400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Shiota, M.; Izumi, H.; Tanimoto, A.; Takahashi, M.; Miyamoto, N.; Kashiwagi, E.; Kidani, A.; Hirano, G.; Masubuchi, D.; Fukunaka, Y.; et al. Programmed cell death protein 4 down-regulates Y-box binding protein-1 expression via a direct interaction with Twist1 to suppress cancer cell growth. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 3148–3156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. White, K.; Dempsie, Y.; Caruso, P.; Wallace, E.; McDonald, R.A.; Stevens, H.; Hatley, M.E.; Van Rooij, E.; Morrell, N.W.; MacLean, M.R.; et al. Endothelial apoptosis in pulmonary hypertension is controlled by a microRNA/programmed cell death 4/caspase-3 axis. Hypertension 2014, 64, 185–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Taylor, J.; Wilmore, S.; Marriot, S.; Rogers-Broadway, K.R.; Fell, R.; Minton, A.R.; Branch, T.; Ashton-Key, M.; Coldwell, M.; Stevenson, F.K.; et al. B-cell receptor signaling induces proteasomal degradation of PDCD4 via MEK1/2 and mTORC1 in malignant B cells. Cell. Signal. 2022, 94, 110311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Lambert, S.A.; Jolma, A.; Campitelli, L.F.; Das, P.K.; Yin, Y.; Albu, M.; Chen, X.; Taipale, J.; Hughes, T.R.; Weirauch, M.T. The Human Transcription Factors. Cell 2018, 172, 650–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Dassaye, R.; Naidoo, S.; Cerf, M.E. Transcription factor regulation of pancreatic organogenesis, differentiation and maturation. Islets. 2016, 8, 13–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Wilanowski, T.; Dworkin, S. Transcription Factors in Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kant, R.; Manne, R.K.; Anas, M.; Penugurti, V.; Chen, T.; Pan, B.S.; Hsu, C.C.; Lin, H.K. Deregulated transcription factors in cancer cell metabolisms and reprogramming. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2022, 86, 1158–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tian, L.; Al-Nusaif, M.; Chen, X.; Li, S.; Le, W. Roles of Transcription Factors in the Development and Reprogramming of the Dopaminergic Neurons. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Weidemüller, P.; Kholmatov, M.; Petsalaki, E.; Zaugg, J.B. Transcription factors: Bridge between cell signaling and gene regulation. Proteomics 2021, 21, e2000034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Eischen, C.M. Genome Stability Requires p53. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2016, 6, a026096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Akhter, M.S.; Uddin, M.A.; Barabutis, N. P53 Regulates the Redox Status of Lung Endothelial Cells. Inflammation 2020, 43, 686–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Perri, F.; Pisconti, S.; Della Vittoria Scarpati, G. P53 mutations and cancer: A tight linkage. Ann. Transl. Med. 2016, 4, 522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chen, Z.; Yuan, Y.C.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Chan, H.J.; Chen, S. Down-regulation of programmed cell death 4 (PDCD4) is associated with aromatase inhibitor resistance and a poor prognosis in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2015, 152, 29–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Li, X.; Xin, S.; Yang, D.; Li, X.; He, Z.; Che, X.; Wang, J.; Chen, F.; Wang, X.; Song, X. Down-regulation of PDCD4 expression is an independent predictor of poor prognosis in human renal cell carcinoma patients. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2012, 138, 529–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wang, Q.; Yang, H.S. The role of Pdcd4 in tumour suppression and protein translation. Biol. Cell 2018, 28, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Li, C.; Du, L.; Ren, Y.; Liu, X.; Jiao, Q.; Cui, D.; Wen, M.; Wang, C.; Wei, G.; Wang, Y.; et al. SKP2 promotes breast cancer tumorigenesis and radiation tolerance through PDCD4 ubiquitination. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 38, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Yang, H.S.; Knies, J.L.; Stark, C.; Colburn, N.H. Pdcd4 suppresses tumor phenotype in JB6 cells by inhibiting AP-1 transactivation. Oncogene 2003, 22, 3712–3720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Wang, Q.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, Z.; Guo, X.; Wang, X.; Lee, E.; Bakthavatchalu, V.; Yang, Q.; Yang, H.S. Down-regulation of programmed cell death 4 leads to epithelial to mesenchymal transition and promotes metastasis in mice. Eur. J. Cancer 2013, 49, 1761–1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Cheng, Y.; Liu, X.; Zhang, S.; Lin, Y.; Yang, J.; Zhang, C. MicroRNA-21 protects against the H(2)O(2)-induced injury on cardiac myocytes via its target gene PDCD4. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2009, 47, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Kumar, N.; Wethkamp, N.; Waters, L.C.; Carr, M.D.; Klempnauer, K.H. Tumor suppressor protein Pdcd4 interacts with Daxx and modulates the stability of Daxx and the Hipk2-dependent phosphorylation of p53 at serine 46. Oncogenesis 2013, 2, e37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Shuvalova, E.; Egorova, T.; Ivanov, A.; Shuvalov, A.; Biziaev, N.; Mukba, S.; Pustogarov, N.; Terenin, I.; Alkalaeva, E. Discovery of a novel role of tumor suppressor PDCD4 in stimulation of translation termination. J Biol Chem. 2021, 297, 101269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Hwang, S.K.; Baker, A.R.; Young, M.R.; Colburn, N.H. Tumor suppressor PDCD4 inhibits NF-κB-dependent transcription in human glioblastoma cells by direct interaction with p65. Carcinogenesis 2014, 35, 1469–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Chen, Q.; Lu, H.; Duan, C.; Zhu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Li, M.; Zhang, D. PDCD4 Simultaneously Promotes Microglia Activation via PDCD4-MAPK-NF-κB Positive Loop and Facilitates Neuron Apoptosis During Neuroinflammation. Inflammation 2022, 45, 234–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Tu, H.; Sun, H.; Lin, Y.; Ding, J.; Nan, K.; Li, Z.; Shen, Q.; Wei, Y. Oxidative stress upregulates PDCD4 expression in patients with gastric cancer via miR-21. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2014, 20, 1917–1923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Feng, F.; Lei, L.; Liao, J.; Huang, X.; Shao, Y. Circ_0060731 mediated miR-21-5p-PDCD4/ESR1 pathway to induce apoptosis of placental trophoblasts in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Tissue Cell 2022, 76, 101771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Shan, W.; Ge, H.; Chen, B.; Huang, L.; Zhu, S.; Zhou, Y. Upregulation of miR-499a-5p Decreases Cerebral Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury by Targeting PDCD4. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2022, 42, 2157–2170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Haupt, Y.; Maya, R.; Kazaz, A.; Oren, M. Mdm2 promotes the rapid degradation of p53. Nature 1997, 387, 296–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Dou, L.; Yang, F.; Xu, L.; Zou, Q. A comprehensive review of the imbalance classification of protein post-translational modifications. Brief. Bioinform. 2021, 8, bbab089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Keenan, E.K.; Zachman, D.K.; Hirschey, M.D. Discovering the landscape of protein modifications. Mol. Cell 2021, 81, 1868–1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Liu, Y.; Tavana, O.; Gu, W. p53 modifications: Exquisite decorations of the powerful guardian. J. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2019, 11, 564–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Gu, B.; Zhu, W.G. Surf the post-translational modification network of p53 regulation. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2012, 8, 672–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Wolkowicz, R.; Rotter, V. The DNA binding regulatory domain of p53: See the C. Pathol. Biol. 1997, 45, 785–796. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  65. Wells, M.; Tidow, H.; Rutherford, T.J.; Markwick, P.; Jensen, M.R.; Mylonas, E.; Svergun, D.I.; Blackledge, M.; Fersht, A.R. Structure of tumor suppressor p53 and its intrinsically disordered N-terminal transactivation domain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 5762–5767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Kim, H.; Kim, K.; Choi, J.; Heo, K.; Baek, H.J.; Roeder, R.G.; An, W. p53 requires an intact C-terminal domain for DNA binding and transactivation. J. Mol. Biol. 2012, 415, 843–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Bitomsky, N.; Böhm, M.; Klempnauer, K.H. Transformation suppressor protein Pdcd4 interferes with JNK-mediated phosphorylation of c-Jun and recruitment of the coactivator p300 by c-Jun. Oncogene 2004, 23, 7484–7493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Curroncol 30 00124 g001 550
Figure 1. p53 decreases PDCD4 protein level. Western blot analysis of PDCD4 expression from H1299 (A–D) and Saos2 (E) cells transfected without or with WT or mutant p53 expression plasmids. (F) Western blot analysis of PDCD4 expression from MCF7 cells treated with p53 siRNA. The expression levels of p53 and PDCD4 were determined using anti-p53 and anti-PDCD4 immunoblotting, respectively. The expression levels of YB-1, Caspase 3, and ERK1/2 were also determined on panel (D,F). The β-Actin levels were determined for equal loading on panel (A,D–F). The original WB can be found in Supplementary Material.
Figure 1. p53 decreases PDCD4 protein level. Western blot analysis of PDCD4 expression from H1299 (A–D) and Saos2 (E) cells transfected without or with WT or mutant p53 expression plasmids. (F) Western blot analysis of PDCD4 expression from MCF7 cells treated with p53 siRNA. The expression levels of p53 and PDCD4 were determined using anti-p53 and anti-PDCD4 immunoblotting, respectively. The expression levels of YB-1, Caspase 3, and ERK1/2 were also determined on panel (D,F). The β-Actin levels were determined for equal loading on panel (A,D–F). The original WB can be found in Supplementary Material.
Curroncol 30 00124 g001
Curroncol 30 00124 g002 550
Figure 2. p53 down-regulates PDCD4 transcription. p53 reduces PDCD4 promoter activity in H1299 (A) and Saos2 (B) cells. Cells in a 24-well plate were co-transfected with either PDCD4 luciferase reporter plasmid or pGL4 empty vector and pRL-TK Renilla control vector, with or without p53 expression plasmids, by Fugene HD. After forty-eight hours of transfection, luciferase activities were analyzed by the Dual-Luciferase Reporter System and normalized to the control Renilla activity. Relative LUC activity was calculated and plotted. The protein levels of p53 in the cells from the reporter assays were confirmed using anti-p53 immunoblotting. The original WB can be found in Supplementary Material.
Figure 2. p53 down-regulates PDCD4 transcription. p53 reduces PDCD4 promoter activity in H1299 (A) and Saos2 (B) cells. Cells in a 24-well plate were co-transfected with either PDCD4 luciferase reporter plasmid or pGL4 empty vector and pRL-TK Renilla control vector, with or without p53 expression plasmids, by Fugene HD. After forty-eight hours of transfection, luciferase activities were analyzed by the Dual-Luciferase Reporter System and normalized to the control Renilla activity. Relative LUC activity was calculated and plotted. The protein levels of p53 in the cells from the reporter assays were confirmed using anti-p53 immunoblotting. The original WB can be found in Supplementary Material.
Curroncol 30 00124 g002
Curroncol 30 00124 g003 550
Figure 3. Hot-spot mutations on p53 abolish p53’s ability to down-regulate PDCD4 transcription. H1299 (A) and Saos2 (B) cells in a 24-well plate were co-transfected with the PDCD4 luciferase reporter plasmid and pRL-TK Renilla control vector and either WT, R273H, or R175H p53 expression plasmids by Fugene HD. After forty-eight hours of transfection, luciferase activities were analyzed by the Dual-Luciferase Reporter System and normalized to the control Renilla activity. Relative LUC activity was calculated and plotted.
Figure 3. Hot-spot mutations on p53 abolish p53’s ability to down-regulate PDCD4 transcription. H1299 (A) and Saos2 (B) cells in a 24-well plate were co-transfected with the PDCD4 luciferase reporter plasmid and pRL-TK Renilla control vector and either WT, R273H, or R175H p53 expression plasmids by Fugene HD. After forty-eight hours of transfection, luciferase activities were analyzed by the Dual-Luciferase Reporter System and normalized to the control Renilla activity. Relative LUC activity was calculated and plotted.
Curroncol 30 00124 g003
Curroncol 30 00124 g004 550
Figure 4. Regions of the PDCD4 promoter important for transcriptional down-regulation by p53. (A) Experimental design: H1299 cells were co-transfected with p53 expression plasmids with either −424 wild-type (WT), −238 to −208 RE mutated (M1), +134 to +159 RE mutated (M2), or both M1 + M2 PDCD4 promoter constructs. (B) Reporter Assays: After forty-eight hours of transfection, luciferase activities were analyzed by the Dual-Luciferase Reporter System and normalized to the control Renilla activity. Relative LUC activity was calculated and plotted. * indicates a p-value < 0.05 compared with PDCD4LUC WT + TP53. ** indicates a p-value < 0.01 compared with PDCD4LUC WT + TP53.
Figure 4. Regions of the PDCD4 promoter important for transcriptional down-regulation by p53. (A) Experimental design: H1299 cells were co-transfected with p53 expression plasmids with either −424 wild-type (WT), −238 to −208 RE mutated (M1), +134 to +159 RE mutated (M2), or both M1 + M2 PDCD4 promoter constructs. (B) Reporter Assays: After forty-eight hours of transfection, luciferase activities were analyzed by the Dual-Luciferase Reporter System and normalized to the control Renilla activity. Relative LUC activity was calculated and plotted. * indicates a p-value < 0.05 compared with PDCD4LUC WT + TP53. ** indicates a p-value < 0.01 compared with PDCD4LUC WT + TP53.
Curroncol 30 00124 g004
Curroncol 30 00124 g005 550
Figure 5. DNA binding domain is required for p53 to down-regulate PDCD4 transcription. H1299 cells in a 24-well plate were co-transfected with PDCD4 luciferase reporter plasmid and pRL-TK Renilla control vector and various p53 mutant expression plasmids by Fugene HD. After forty-eight hours of transfection, luciferase activities were analyzed by the Dual-Luciferase Reporter System and normalized to the control Renilla activity. Relative LUC activity was calculated and plotted. * indicates a p-value < 0.05 compared with the control.
Figure 5. DNA binding domain is required for p53 to down-regulate PDCD4 transcription. H1299 cells in a 24-well plate were co-transfected with PDCD4 luciferase reporter plasmid and pRL-TK Renilla control vector and various p53 mutant expression plasmids by Fugene HD. After forty-eight hours of transfection, luciferase activities were analyzed by the Dual-Luciferase Reporter System and normalized to the control Renilla activity. Relative LUC activity was calculated and plotted. * indicates a p-value < 0.05 compared with the control.
Curroncol 30 00124 g005
Curroncol 30 00124 g006 550
Figure 6. The C-terminal domain (between aa374 and aa370) of p53 is required for p53-mediated PDCD4 repression. H1299 cells in a 24-well plate were co-transfected with PDCD4 luciferase reporter plasmid and pRL-TK Renilla control vector, and various truncated p53 expression plasmids by Fugene HD. After forty-eight hours of transfection, luciferase activities were analyzed by the Dual-Luciferase Reporter System and normalized to the control Renilla activity. Relative LUC activity was calculated and plotted. p53 protein levels in the cells from the reporter assays were confirmed using anti-p53 immunoblotting. * indicates a p-value < 0.05 compared with pcDNA4 (control). The original WB can be found in Supplementary Material.
Figure 6. The C-terminal domain (between aa374 and aa370) of p53 is required for p53-mediated PDCD4 repression. H1299 cells in a 24-well plate were co-transfected with PDCD4 luciferase reporter plasmid and pRL-TK Renilla control vector, and various truncated p53 expression plasmids by Fugene HD. After forty-eight hours of transfection, luciferase activities were analyzed by the Dual-Luciferase Reporter System and normalized to the control Renilla activity. Relative LUC activity was calculated and plotted. p53 protein levels in the cells from the reporter assays were confirmed using anti-p53 immunoblotting. * indicates a p-value < 0.05 compared with pcDNA4 (control). The original WB can be found in Supplementary Material.
Curroncol 30 00124 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, W.H.; George, A.P.; Wang, C.-M.; Yang, R.H.; Duncan, A.M.; Patel, D.; Neil, Z.D.; Yang, W.-H. Tumor Suppressor p53 Down-Regulates Programmed Cell Death Protein 4 (PDCD4) Expression. Curr. Oncol. 2023, 30, 1614-1625. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30020124

AMA Style

Yang WH, George AP, Wang C-M, Yang RH, Duncan AM, Patel D, Neil ZD, Yang W-H. Tumor Suppressor p53 Down-Regulates Programmed Cell Death Protein 4 (PDCD4) Expression. Current Oncology. 2023; 30(2):1614-1625. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30020124

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, William H., Andrew P. George, Chiung-Min Wang, Richard H. Yang, Avery M. Duncan, Darshti Patel, Zachery D. Neil, and Wei-Hsiung Yang. 2023. "Tumor Suppressor p53 Down-Regulates Programmed Cell Death Protein 4 (PDCD4) Expression" Current Oncology 30, no. 2: 1614-1625. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30020124

APA Style

Yang, W. H., George, A. P., Wang, C. -M., Yang, R. H., Duncan, A. M., Patel, D., Neil, Z. D., & Yang, W. -H. (2023). Tumor Suppressor p53 Down-Regulates Programmed Cell Death Protein 4 (PDCD4) Expression. Current Oncology, 30(2), 1614-1625. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30020124

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop