Next Article in Journal
Abstracts Submitted to the Cell Therapy Transplant Canada 2020 Annual Conference
Previous Article in Journal
Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for the Frontline Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Expression of PD-L1 for Predicting Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

1
Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat- Sen University, Guangzhou, China
2
Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2020, 27(6), 656-663; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.27.6437
Submission received: 1 September 2020 / Revised: 2 October 2020 / Accepted: 8 November 2020 / Published: 1 December 2020

Abstract

Background: We conducted this meta-analysis and systematic literature review to study the ability of PD-L1 to predict objective response in patients with urothelial cancer treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Methods: Relevant studies of PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors in urothelial cancer that reported objective response rate (orr) based on PD-L1 expression status in PubMed, embase, and the Cochrane Library were retrieved. Efficacy of PD-L1 expression status in predicting orr and the efficacy, safety of PD-1 and PD-L1 drugs were analyzed. Results: Studies were divided into ≥1%, ≥5%, and ≥25% based on PD-L1 positivity threshold, and the patients were grouped into PD-L1 positive and negative. In all 3 expression thresholds, patients with positive PD-L1 expression were more likely to experience an objective response [≥1% threshold odds ratio (or): 1.74; 95% confidence interval (ci): 1.20 to 2.53; ≥5% threshold or: 2.74; 95% ci: 2.01 to 3.724; ≥25% threshold or: 7.13; 95% ci: 2.38 to 21.40] in comparison with patients with negative PD-L1 expression. Of the 3 thresholds, the ≥25% threshold was better in predicting orr (1.74 vs. 2.93 vs. 7.13; p < 0.0001). The ≥1% PD-L1 threshold had a relatively high sensitivity in predicting orr; the ≥5% PD-L1 threshold was better for specificity. Sensitivity was higher at the ≥25% threshold than at the other two thresholds, but specificity was lower. Further, we found that there is no statistically significant difference in efficacy between PD-1 and PD-L1 drugs. Conclusions: Urothelial cancer patients with PD-L1 positive expression responded better than PD-L1 negative patients did, and a threshold of ≥5% or greater for PD-L1 expression might predict positive clinical response.
Keywords: meta-analyses; PD-1; biomarkers; atezolizumab; pembrolizumab meta-analyses; PD-1; biomarkers; atezolizumab; pembrolizumab

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, J.; Teng, X. Expression of PD-L1 for Predicting Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Curr. Oncol. 2020, 27, 656-663. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.27.6437

AMA Style

Huang J, Teng X. Expression of PD-L1 for Predicting Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Current Oncology. 2020; 27(6):656-663. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.27.6437

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huang, J., and Xiaodong Teng. 2020. "Expression of PD-L1 for Predicting Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" Current Oncology 27, no. 6: 656-663. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.27.6437

APA Style

Huang, J., & Teng, X. (2020). Expression of PD-L1 for Predicting Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Current Oncology, 27(6), 656-663. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.27.6437

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop