Next Article in Journal
Employment Outcomes for Recent Canadian Radiation Oncology Graduates
Previous Article in Journal
Who Cares? the Impact on Caregivers of Suspected Mining-Related Lung Cancer
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Alberta: Rationale, Scope, and Design of a Database Initiative

1
Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
2
Alberta Health Services CancerControl and Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
3
Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2019, 26(4), 503-509; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.26.4919
Submission received: 6 May 2019 / Revised: 12 June 2019 / Accepted: 11 July 2019 / Published: 1 August 2019

Abstract

Background: The collection of patient reported outcomes (PROS) is a standard of care in many cancer organizations. In Alberta, pros have been integrated into routine clinical practice since 2012. This longitudinal collection of pros provides a wealth of data and a unique research opportunity to improve cancer care. The goal of this pro data initiative is to establish a robust repository of information for ongoing clinical care and research focused on pros. In this paper, we describe the rationale, scope, and design of this initiative. Implementation: The initiative consists of pros and other administrative health data from the province of Alberta. Retrieval of health data from a variety of provincially governed sources will create a platform of information on pros, health outcomes, cancer data, other health conditions, and demographics. The aims of the initiative are to use the data to inform best practices at the point of care; to conduct health services research, particularly clinical epidemiology studies; and to evaluate a variety of pro-related outcomes. Discussion: Because this effort represents our first to integrate routinely collected pros with other administrative health data, a unique and robust data repository will be created. The ability to integrate various types of data will provide a comprehensive mechanism to evaluate a variety of outcomes. Because cancer care in Alberta is governed by a single health care system, the data linkages will include population health and psychosocial cancer data. We anticipate that research related to this initiative will ultimately help to inform more patient-centred care.
Keywords: patient-reported outcomes; pros; patient-centred care; health services research; administrative health data patient-reported outcomes; pros; patient-centred care; health services research; administrative health data

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cuthbert, C.A.; Watson, L.; Xu, Y.; Boyne, D.J.; Hemmelgarn, B.R.; Cheung, W.Y. Patient-Reported Outcomes in Alberta: Rationale, Scope, and Design of a Database Initiative. Curr. Oncol. 2019, 26, 503-509. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.26.4919

AMA Style

Cuthbert CA, Watson L, Xu Y, Boyne DJ, Hemmelgarn BR, Cheung WY. Patient-Reported Outcomes in Alberta: Rationale, Scope, and Design of a Database Initiative. Current Oncology. 2019; 26(4):503-509. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.26.4919

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cuthbert, C.A., L. Watson, Y. Xu, D.J. Boyne, B.R. Hemmelgarn, and W.Y. Cheung. 2019. "Patient-Reported Outcomes in Alberta: Rationale, Scope, and Design of a Database Initiative" Current Oncology 26, no. 4: 503-509. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.26.4919

APA Style

Cuthbert, C. A., Watson, L., Xu, Y., Boyne, D. J., Hemmelgarn, B. R., & Cheung, W. Y. (2019). Patient-Reported Outcomes in Alberta: Rationale, Scope, and Design of a Database Initiative. Current Oncology, 26(4), 503-509. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.26.4919

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop