Next Article in Journal
The Changing Landscape of Thoracic Malignancies
Previous Article in Journal
Circulating Tumour DNA in EGFR-Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Antiangiogenic Therapies in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2018, 25(s1), 45-58; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.25.3747
Submission received: 7 March 2018 / Revised: 5 April 2018 / Accepted: 9 May 2018 / Published: 1 June 2018

Abstract

Angiogenesis is frequent in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and is associated with more aggressive disease. Many clinical trials have evaluated the addition of antiangiogenic therapy to standard therapies for patients with NSCLC. Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody directed against serum vascular endothelial growth factor, in combination with carboplatin–paclitaxel chemotherapy, has been shown to improve survival for patients with NSCLC. However, bevacizumab-based therapy is not suitable for many NSCLC patients, including those with squamous histology, poor performance status, brain metastases, and the presence of bleeding or thrombotic disorders. Similar efficacy has also been seen with carboplatin–pemetrexed followed by maintenance pemetrexed chemotherapy. In the second-line setting, the addition of ramucirumab to docetaxel—or the addition of bevacizumab to paclitaxel—has resulted in a modest improvement in efficacy, although the clinical importance of those findings is questionable. Many trials in NSCLC have also evaluated oral antiangiogenic compounds, both in the first line in combination with chemotherapy and upon disease progression either as combination or single-agent therapy. No clear improvements in overall survival have been observed, although a subgroup analysis of a trial evaluating the addition of nintedanib to docetaxel showed improved survival that was limited to patients with adenocarcinoma. Those findings require validation, however. All of the oral antiangiogenic agents result in added toxicities. Some agents have resulted in an increased risk of death, limiting their development. Available evidence supports a limited number of antiangiogenic therapies for patients with NSCLC, but no biomarkers to help in patient selection are currently available, and additional translational research is needed to identify predictive biomarkers for antiangiogenic therapy.
Keywords: non-small-cell lung cancer; antiangiogenic therapy; monoclonal antibodies; tyrosine kinase inhibitors; overall survival; progression-free survival non-small-cell lung cancer; antiangiogenic therapy; monoclonal antibodies; tyrosine kinase inhibitors; overall survival; progression-free survival

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alshangiti, A.; Chandhoke, G.; Ellis, P.M. Antiangiogenic Therapies in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Curr. Oncol. 2018, 25, 45-58. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.25.3747

AMA Style

Alshangiti A, Chandhoke G, Ellis PM. Antiangiogenic Therapies in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Current Oncology. 2018; 25(s1):45-58. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.25.3747

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alshangiti, A., G. Chandhoke, and P.M. Ellis. 2018. "Antiangiogenic Therapies in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer" Current Oncology 25, no. s1: 45-58. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.25.3747

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop