Next Article in Journal
Pomalidomide Desensitization in a Patient Hypersensitive to Immunomodulating Agents
Previous Article in Journal
Adrenocortical Carcinoma: Patterns of Care and Role of Adjuvant Radiation Therapy—A Population-Based Study and Review of the Literature
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Short Communication

Lymph Node Retrieval Rates in Melanoma: A Quality Assessment Parameter

by
D. Berger-Richardson
1,
E. Cordeiro
2,
M. Ernjakovic
1 and
A.M. Easson
1,3,*
1
Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
2
Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
3
Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2017, 24(4), 323-327; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.24.3593
Submission received: 5 May 2017 / Revised: 6 June 2017 / Accepted: 8 July 2017 / Published: 1 August 2017

Abstract

Introduction: Regional lymph node dissection (RLND) for melanoma with nodal metastasis is a specialized procedure that is associated with improved disease-specific survival in selected patients. Furthermore, there is evidence that a higher lymph node retrieval rate (LNRR) is associated with improved local control. Currently, no consensus has been reached on the definition of an adequate LNRR. A minimum LNRR has been proposed as a quality assessment parameter that has to be validated. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (University Health Network, Toronto, ON). The LNRRS for all patients who underwent RLND for malignant cutaneous melanoma during 2000–2010 were recorded. Indications for RLND were a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy or clinical lymphadenopathy (palpable or radiologically detected). Results: Of the 207 identified RLNDS, 146 (70.5%) were subsequent to a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy, and 61 (29.5%) were performed for clinical lymphadenopathy. The median LNRR was 24 nodes (range: 9–47 nodes; 10th percentile: 14 nodes) for axillary RLND, 12 nodes (range: 5–30 nodes; 10th percentile: 8 nodes) for inguinal RLND, and 16 nodes (range: 10–21 nodes; 10th percentile: 11 nodes) for ilioinguinal RLND. The results were similar when comparing patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes and those with clinical lymphadenopathy, and the same surgical techniques were used in both groups. Conclusions: The LNRRS at our institution are similar to rates reported at other tertiary-care melanoma centres. A minimum acceptable LNRR can be considered a quality assessment parameter in the surgical management of melanoma with nodal metastasis.
Keywords: melanoma; lymph node retrieval rates; quality assessment melanoma; lymph node retrieval rates; quality assessment

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Berger-Richardson, D.; Cordeiro, E.; Ernjakovic, M.; Easson, A.M. Lymph Node Retrieval Rates in Melanoma: A Quality Assessment Parameter. Curr. Oncol. 2017, 24, 323-327. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.24.3593

AMA Style

Berger-Richardson D, Cordeiro E, Ernjakovic M, Easson AM. Lymph Node Retrieval Rates in Melanoma: A Quality Assessment Parameter. Current Oncology. 2017; 24(4):323-327. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.24.3593

Chicago/Turabian Style

Berger-Richardson, D., E. Cordeiro, M. Ernjakovic, and A.M. Easson. 2017. "Lymph Node Retrieval Rates in Melanoma: A Quality Assessment Parameter" Current Oncology 24, no. 4: 323-327. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.24.3593

APA Style

Berger-Richardson, D., Cordeiro, E., Ernjakovic, M., & Easson, A. M. (2017). Lymph Node Retrieval Rates in Melanoma: A Quality Assessment Parameter. Current Oncology, 24(4), 323-327. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.24.3593

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop