Next Article in Journal
The Economic Burden of Cancers Attributable to Tobacco Smoking, Excess Weight, Alcohol Use, and Physical Inactivity in Canada
Previous Article in Journal
Cancer Incidence, Mortality, and Stage at Diagnosis in First Nations Living in Manitoba
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Open AccessArticle

Fee-for-Service Cancer Rehabilitation Programs Improve Health-Related Quality of Life

1
Rehabilitation Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
2
School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
3
Back on Track Fitness, Vancouver, BC, Canada
4
Live Well Exercise Clinic, White Rock, BC, Canada
5
Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2016, 23(4), 233-240; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.23.3038
Received: 10 May 2016 / Revised: 15 June 2016 / Accepted: 11 July 2016 / Published: 1 August 2016
Background: Rigorously applied exercise interventions undertaken in a research setting result in improved health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in cancer survivors, but research to demonstrate effective translation of that research to practice is needed. The objective of the present study was to determine the effect of fee-for-service cancer rehabilitation programs in the community on hrqol and on self-reported physical activity and its correlates. Methods: After enrolment and 17 ± 4 weeks later, new clients (n = 48) to two fee-for-service cancer rehabilitation programs completed the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (RAND-36: rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, U.S.A.), the Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire, and questions about physical activity correlates. Normal fee-for-service operations were maintained, including a fitness assessment and individualized exercise programs supervised in a group or one-on-one setting, with no minimum attendance required. Fees were associated with the assessment and with each exercise session. Results: Of the 48 participants, 36 (75%) completed both questionnaires. Improvements in the physical functioning, role physical, pain, and energy/fatigue scales on the RAND-36 exceeded minimally important differences and were of a magnitude similar to improvements reported in structured, rigorously applied, and free research interventions. Self-reported levels of vigorous-intensity (p = 0.021), but not moderate-intensity (p = 0.831) physical activity increased. The number of perceived barriers to exercise (p = 0.035) and the prevalence of fatigue as a barrier (p = 0.003) decreased. Exercise self-efficacy improved only in participants who attended 11 or more sessions (p = 0.002). Exercise enjoyment did not change (p = 0.629). Conclusions: Enrolment in fee-for-service cancer rehabilitation programs results in meaningful improvements in HRQOL comparable to those reported by research interventions, among other benefits. The fee-for-service model could be an effective model for delivery of exercise to more cancer survivors.
Keywords: physical activity; quality of life; exercise therapy; fatigue physical activity; quality of life; exercise therapy; fatigue
MDPI and ACS Style

Kirkham, A.A.; Neil-Sztramko, S.E.; Morgan, J.; Hodson, S.; Weller, S.; McRae, T.; Campbell, K.L. Fee-for-Service Cancer Rehabilitation Programs Improve Health-Related Quality of Life. Curr. Oncol. 2016, 23, 233-240. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.23.3038

AMA Style

Kirkham AA, Neil-Sztramko SE, Morgan J, Hodson S, Weller S, McRae T, Campbell KL. Fee-for-Service Cancer Rehabilitation Programs Improve Health-Related Quality of Life. Current Oncology. 2016; 23(4):233-240. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.23.3038

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kirkham, A.A.; Neil-Sztramko, S.E.; Morgan, J.; Hodson, S.; Weller, S.; McRae, T.; Campbell, K.L. 2016. "Fee-for-Service Cancer Rehabilitation Programs Improve Health-Related Quality of Life" Curr. Oncol. 23, no. 4: 233-240. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.23.3038

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop