Next Article in Journal
Retrospective Analysis of the Effect of CAPOX and mFOLFOX6 Dose Intensity on Survival in Colorectal Patients in the Adjuvant Setting
Previous Article in Journal
Provincial Elections and Timing of Cancer Drug Funding
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Real-World Adjuvant TAC or FEC-D for HER2-Negative Node-Positive Breast Cancer in Women Less Than 50 Years of Age

1
Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
2
CancerControl Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada
3
Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2016, 23(3), 164-170; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.23.3004
Submission received: 15 March 2016 / Revised: 18 April 2016 / Accepted: 11 May 2016 / Published: 1 June 2016

Abstract

Purpose: We compared the efficacy, toxicity, and use of granulocyte colony–stimulating factor (g-csf) with tac (docetaxel–doxorubicin–cyclophosphamide) and fec-d (5-fluorouracil–epirubicin–cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel) in women less than 50 years of age. Methods: The study included all women more than 18 years but less than 50 years of age with her2-negative, node-positive, stage ii or iii breast cancer diagnosed in Alberta between 2008 and 2012 who received tac (n = 198) or fec-d (n = 274). Results: The patient groups were well-balanced, except that radiotherapy use was higher in the tac group (91.9% vs. 79.9%, p < 0.001). At a median follow-up of 49.6 months, disease-free survival was 91.4% for tac and 92.0% for fec-d (p = 0.76). Overall survival (os) was 96% with tac and 95.3% with fec-d (p = 0.86).The incidences of grades 3 and 4 toxicities were similar in the two groups (all p > 0.05). Overall, febrile neutropenia (fn) was reported in 11.6% of tac patients and 15.7% of fec-d patients (p = 0.26). However, use of g-csf was higher in the tac group than in the fec-d group (96.4% vs. 71.5%, p < 0.001). Hospitalization for fn was required in 10.5% of tac patients and 13.0% of fec-d patients (p = 0.41). In g-csf–supported and –unsupported patients receiving tac, fn occurred at rates of 11.1% and 33.3% respectively (p = 0.08); in patients receiving the fec portion of fec-d, those proportions were 2.9% and 8.1% respectively (p = 0.24); and in patients receiving docetaxel after fec, the proportions were 4.1% and 17.6% respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusions: In women less than 50 years of age receiving adjuvant tac or fec-d, we observed no differences in efficacy or other nonhematologic toxicities. Based on the timing and rates of fn, use of prophylactic g-csf should be routine for the docetaxel-containing portion of treatment; however, prophylactic g-csf could potentially be avoided during the fec portion of fec-d treatment.
Keywords: efficacy; toxicity; G-CSF,; granulocyte colony–stimulating factor; febrile neutropenia; systemic therapy; hospitalization efficacy; toxicity; G-CSF,; granulocyte colony–stimulating factor; febrile neutropenia; systemic therapy; hospitalization

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lupichuk, S.; Tilley, D.; Kostaras, X.; Joy, A.A. Real-World Adjuvant TAC or FEC-D for HER2-Negative Node-Positive Breast Cancer in Women Less Than 50 Years of Age. Curr. Oncol. 2016, 23, 164-170. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.23.3004

AMA Style

Lupichuk S, Tilley D, Kostaras X, Joy AA. Real-World Adjuvant TAC or FEC-D for HER2-Negative Node-Positive Breast Cancer in Women Less Than 50 Years of Age. Current Oncology. 2016; 23(3):164-170. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.23.3004

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lupichuk, S., D. Tilley, X. Kostaras, and A.A. Joy. 2016. "Real-World Adjuvant TAC or FEC-D for HER2-Negative Node-Positive Breast Cancer in Women Less Than 50 Years of Age" Current Oncology 23, no. 3: 164-170. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.23.3004

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop