Next Article in Journal
Can the Referring Surgeon Enhance Accrual of Breast Cancer Patients to Medical and Radiation Oncology Trials? The Enhance Study
Previous Article in Journal
Improving Patient Flow and Timeliness in the Diagnosis and Management of Breast Abnormalities: The Impact of a Rapid Diagnostic Unit
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Treatment of Peritoneal Surface Malignancies with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy—Current Perspectives

1
Metaxa Canc Inst, Dept Surg 1, Piraeus, Greece
2
IASO Gen Hosp, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Unit, Athens, Greece
3
Department of Surgical Oncology, University Hospital, P.O. Box 1352, Heraklion 71110, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2016, 23(3), 266-275; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.23.2831
Submission received: 3 March 2016 / Revised: 4 April 2016 / Accepted: 9 May 2016 / Published: 1 June 2016

Abstract

Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PTC) represents advanced malignant disease and has generally been associated with a grim prognosis. Peritoneal surface malignancy is often the major source of morbidity and mortality; it is of major concern in cancer management. Although PTC is categorized as metastatic disease, it represents a special disease pattern considered to be a locoregional disease limited to the abdominal cavity. The combination of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and intraoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has successfully been used as locoregional treatment for selected patients with PTC from gastric, colorectal, and ovarian cancer; with mesothelioma; and with pseudomyxoma peritonei. In the prophylactic setting, HIPEC can also be used to prevent PTC in high-risk patients, and the first results of the “second-look” approach are promising. Patient selection—in which the risks of perioperative morbidity and mortality, which are analogous to those for any other major gastrointestinal surgery, are assessed—is of utmost importance. Those risks have to be weighed against the anticipated survival benefit, which depends mainly on tumour biology, extent of disease, and probability of achieving complete CRS. The present review discusses the principles of CRS and HIPEC, the most significant recent clinical data, and current perspectives concerning the application of this treatment modality in various malignancies. Ongoing trials and future directions are noted. It appears that the combination of CRS and HIPEC is an indispensable tool in the oncologist’s armamentarium.
Keywords: peritoneal carcinomatosis; peritoneal mesothelioma; pseudomyxoma peritonei; cytoreductive surgery; hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy; hipec peritoneal carcinomatosis; peritoneal mesothelioma; pseudomyxoma peritonei; cytoreductive surgery; hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy; hipec

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Spiliotis, J.; Halkia, E.; de Bree, E. Treatment of Peritoneal Surface Malignancies with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy—Current Perspectives. Curr. Oncol. 2016, 23, 266-275. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.23.2831

AMA Style

Spiliotis J, Halkia E, de Bree E. Treatment of Peritoneal Surface Malignancies with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy—Current Perspectives. Current Oncology. 2016; 23(3):266-275. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.23.2831

Chicago/Turabian Style

Spiliotis, J., E. Halkia, and E. de Bree. 2016. "Treatment of Peritoneal Surface Malignancies with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy—Current Perspectives" Current Oncology 23, no. 3: 266-275. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.23.2831

APA Style

Spiliotis, J., Halkia, E., & de Bree, E. (2016). Treatment of Peritoneal Surface Malignancies with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy—Current Perspectives. Current Oncology, 23(3), 266-275. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.23.2831

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop