Next Article in Journal
Risk Perception and Psychological Morbidity in Men at Elevated Risk for Prostate Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
A Pilot Study Using the Chinese Herbal Paste Liu-He-Dan to Manage Radiodermatitis Associated with Breast Cancer Radiotherapy
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Analysis of Liver-Directed Therapies in U.S. Cancer Patients

1
Department of Hematology and Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
2
Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center, Cedars–Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
3
Department of Biostatistics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2015, 22(6), 457-461; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.22.2819
Submission received: 8 September 2015 / Revised: 6 October 2015 / Accepted: 11 November 2015 / Published: 1 December 2015

Abstract

Background: The liver is a common site of primary and metastatic cancer. Liver-directed therapies are commonly used to treat cancer involving the liver. We report on the patterns, predictors, and outcomes of liver-directed therapies in hospitalized cancer patients in the United States. Methods: Data were obtained from all U.S. states that contributed to the Nationwide Inpatient Sample maintained by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality between 2006 and 2010. Univariate and multivariate testing was used to identify factors significantly associated with patient outcome. Results: For the 5-year period of interest, 12,540 patient discharges were identified. Mean age in the sample was 60 years. Primary liver lesions (n = 8840) made up 26.9% of the sample; the remaining cases were metastases. Most procedures were performed in large (79%) urban (98%) hospitals and in patients with insurance (97.9%). The most common intervention was partial hepatectomy (42.7%), followed by open (9.9%), percutaneous (7.2%), and laparoscopic (5.04%) ablation of liver lesions; embolization (9.8%); and liver transplantation (2.64%). The incidence of in-hospital mortality was very low (2.4%), and the complication rate was 12.2%. Complications such as acute liver necrosis, ascites, hepatic coma, hepatorenal syndrome, liver abscess, and high number of comorbid illnesses (>8) accounted for 60% of the in-hospital mortality. Conclusions: The low rate of morbidity and mortality associated with liver-directed therapies in hospitalized cancer patients supports the continuing utility of such procedures in the management of primary and metastatic liver cancer. The patterns of health disparities observed with respect to the use of liver-directed therapies are concerning.
Keywords: liver; therapies; predictors; outcomes; hospitalization liver; therapies; predictors; outcomes; hospitalization

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alese, O.B.; Kim, S.; Chen, Z.; Ramalingam, S.S.; Owonikoko, T.K.; El-Rayes, B.F. Analysis of Liver-Directed Therapies in U.S. Cancer Patients. Curr. Oncol. 2015, 22, 457-461. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.22.2819

AMA Style

Alese OB, Kim S, Chen Z, Ramalingam SS, Owonikoko TK, El-Rayes BF. Analysis of Liver-Directed Therapies in U.S. Cancer Patients. Current Oncology. 2015; 22(6):457-461. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.22.2819

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alese, O.B., S. Kim, Z. Chen, S.S. Ramalingam, T.K. Owonikoko, and B.F. El-Rayes. 2015. "Analysis of Liver-Directed Therapies in U.S. Cancer Patients" Current Oncology 22, no. 6: 457-461. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.22.2819

APA Style

Alese, O. B., Kim, S., Chen, Z., Ramalingam, S. S., Owonikoko, T. K., & El-Rayes, B. F. (2015). Analysis of Liver-Directed Therapies in U.S. Cancer Patients. Current Oncology, 22(6), 457-461. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.22.2819

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop