Recommendations for the Perioperative Management of Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device
Abstract
Introduction
Potential perioperative risks
- Site of surgerySensing electromagnetic interference (EMI) is more likely if surgery is performed <15 cm away from the device, i.e., above the umbilicus.
- Underlying cardiac rhythmOnly a minority of pacemaker patients are completely pacemaker-dependent and at risk for prolonged asystole. For the remainder, short periods of EMI (<5 seconds) during cautery will not result in asystole even if they temporarily inhibit pacing.
- Type and programming of the deviceEMI is more likely in patients with unipolar leads (which have become very rare) and those with a very high programmed sensitivity.Inappropriately rapid pacing can be caused by manipulation in the vicinity of the generator (“activity sensors”) or by mechanical ventilation or monitoring of respiratory rate in patients with rate-modulation technology (minute ventilation sensors) [2]. These minute ventilation sensors are used in Boston Scientific and Sorin devices, and measure transthoracic impedance. Mechanical ventilation or the current delivered by external respiratory rate monitors may lead to rapid ventricular pacing which must not be misinterpreted as ventricular tachycardia. Hence suspension of rate response during the procedure should be considered; this can be accomplished with a magnet in pacemaker patients, but requires reprogramming with ICDs.
- Type of cautery utilisedEMI is more likely to occur with unipolar cautery. The grounding pad of the coagulation system should therefore be positioned away from the device (e.g., upper thigh). Bipolar cautery should be preferred over unipolar cautery, with bursts lasting <5 seconds with 5-second pauses between bursts. When using an argon beam coagulation system, reprogramming of the pacemaker in a dependent patient should be considered, since experience is still limited [1].
Principle of magnet use
Pacemakers (Table 2)
Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (Table 3)
Minimal preoperative care
Intraoperative care
Pacemakers
Implantable cardioverter defibrillators
Postoperative care
Conclusion
Acknowledgments
Disclosure statement
Abbreviations
ATP | antitachycardia pacing |
CIED | cardiac implantable electronic device |
CRT | cardiac resynchronisation therapy |
EMI | electromagnetic interference |
ICD | implantable cardioverter defibrillator |
References
- Healey, J.S.; Merchant, R.; Simpson, C.; Tang, T.; Beardsall, M.; et al. Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Anesthesiologists’ Society/ Canadian Heart Rhythm Society joint position statement on the perioperative management of patients with implanted pacemak- ers, defibrillators, and neurostimulating devices. Can. J. Cardiol. 2012, 28, 141–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mukerji, S.; Khunnawat, C.; Sankaran, S.; Thakur, R.K. Wide QRS complex tachycardia in a patient with a minute ventilation rate-responsive pacemaker. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 2006, 29, 296–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jacob, S.; Panaich, S.S.; Maheshwari, R.; Haddad, J.W.; Padanilam, B.J.; John, S.K. Clinical applications of magnets on cardiac rhythm management devices. Europace 2011, 13, 1222–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cheng, A.; Nazarian, S.; Spragg, D.D.; Bilchick, K.; Tandri, H.; et al. Effects of surgical and endoscopic electrocautery on modern-day permanent pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator systems. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 2008, 31, 344–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Filipovic, M.; Michaux, I.; Seeberger, M.D. Harm associated with reprogramming pacemakers for surgery. Anesthesiology 2002, 97, 1033–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Anand, N.K.; Maguire, D.P. Anesthetic implications for patients with rate-responsive pacemakers. Semin. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 2005, 9, 251–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Pacemaker | Implantable cardioverter difibrillator | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Device always accessible and outside operation field | Bradycardia function | Tachyarrhythmia function | |||
No or minimal cautery | No reprogramming Have magnet available | No reprogramming | Apply magnet | ||
Significant cautery | Not pacemakerdependent | Yes | No reprogramming Have magnet available | No reprogramming | Apply magnet |
No | No reprogramming | No reprogramming | Reprogramme | ||
Pacemakerdependent | Yes | Apply magnet | Consider reprogramming | Apply magnet | |
No | Reprogram | Reprogram | Reprogram |
Manufacturer | Response* | Remarks |
---|---|---|
Biotronik | Auto: DOO/VOO/VDO, 90 bpm for 10 beats, then back to synchronous | Can be programmed to Async or Sync response |
Boston Scientific | DOO/VOO/VDO, 100 bpm | Can be programmed OFF |
Medtronic | DOO/VOO/VDO, 85 bpm | |
St. Jude Medical | DOO/VOO/VDO, 100 bpm | Can be programmed OFF |
Sorin/Ela | DOO/VOO/VDO, 96 bpm |
Manufacturer | Response to Brady function | Response to Tachy function | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|
Biotronik | None | Detection/therapy: OFF | Since Lumax: during maximum of 8 hours |
Boston Scientific | None | * | |
Medtronic | None | Detection: OFF | Patient alert “ON”: continuous tone: OK, alternating tone: alarm |
St. Jude Medical | None | Detection/therapy: OFF | Can be programmed to “Ignore magnet” Atlas and Epic: vibratory alert |
Sorin/Ela | Pace in programmed mode at magnet rate (96 bpm) | Detection/therapy: OFF |
© 2016 by the author. Attribution - Non-Commercial - NoDerivatives 4.0.
Share and Cite
Sticherling, C.; Menafoglio, A.; Burri, H.; Reek, S.; Fuhrer, J.; Ganière, V.; Zimmerli, M.; Babotai, I.; Duru, F.; Pruvot, E., on behalf of the Swiss Working Group on Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology; et al. Recommendations for the Perioperative Management of Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device. Cardiovasc. Med. 2016, 19, 13. https://doi.org/10.4414/cvm.2016.00378
Sticherling C, Menafoglio A, Burri H, Reek S, Fuhrer J, Ganière V, Zimmerli M, Babotai I, Duru F, Pruvot E on behalf of the Swiss Working Group on Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, et al. Recommendations for the Perioperative Management of Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device. Cardiovascular Medicine. 2016; 19(1):13. https://doi.org/10.4414/cvm.2016.00378
Chicago/Turabian StyleSticherling, Christian, Andrea Menafoglio, Haran Burri, Sven Reek, Jürg Fuhrer, Vincent Ganière, Marianne Zimmerli, Istvan Babotai, Firat Duru, Etienne Pruvot on behalf of the Swiss Working Group on Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, and et al. 2016. "Recommendations for the Perioperative Management of Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device" Cardiovascular Medicine 19, no. 1: 13. https://doi.org/10.4414/cvm.2016.00378
APA StyleSticherling, C., Menafoglio, A., Burri, H., Reek, S., Fuhrer, J., Ganière, V., Zimmerli, M., Babotai, I., Duru, F., Pruvot, E., on behalf of the Swiss Working Group on Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Seeberger, M., Kindler, C., Basciani, R., Vogt, A., Eberle, B., Marcucci, C., Ecknauer, E., & Bolliger, D., on behalf of the Cardiovascular and Thoracic Anaesthesia Group of the Swiss Society of Anaesthesiology and Resuscitation. (2016). Recommendations for the Perioperative Management of Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device. Cardiovascular Medicine, 19(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.4414/cvm.2016.00378