Next Article in Journal
Coronary Stent Fracture: Problem or Blessing?
Previous Article in Journal
4. «Cardiovascular Roundtable»
 
 
Cardiovascular Medicine is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2025). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Editores Medicorum Helveticorum (EMH).
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Interesting Images

Atrial Arrhythmia in the Intensive Care Unit

by
Simon Ritter
1,* and
Marco Maggiorini
2
1
Intensive Care Unit, Department of Internal Medicine Stadtspital Triemli, Birmensdorferstrasse 497, CH-8063 Zurich, Switzerland
2
Intensive Care Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cardiovasc. Med. 2008, 11(2), 64; https://doi.org/10.4414/cvm.2008.01309
Submission received: 22 November 2007 / Revised: 22 December 2007 / Accepted: 22 January 2008 / Published: 22 February 2008

Case report

A 72-year-old man was admitted because of cardiogenic shock due to acute anterior myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation. Percutaneous coronary intervention was performed with stenting of the occluded proximal left anterior descending artery with two sirolimus-eluting stents and placement of intra-aortic balloon pump. Mechanical ventilation and haemodynamic support with dobutamine and norepinephrine were required. Later on, anti-arrhythmic therapy with amiodarone was needed because of atrial fibrillation. Only after electrical cardioversion sinus rhythm was reestablished. In sustained low output heart failure dobutamine was replaced by levosimendan (Simdax®). Furthermore, renal replacement therapy was started because of progressive renal failure. During continuous venovenous haemofiltration (Cobe Prisma system®), Gambro Healthcare, USA) the patient developed an apparent atrial flutter with variable atrioventricular conduction (fig. 1). Is this the correct diagnosis?

Explanatory answers

Shortly after initiation of haemofiltration the electrocardiogram (ECG) showed an atrial arrhythmia with saw-toothed flutter waves consistent with atrial flutter (Figure 1). Immediately after turning off the haemofiltration system, normal sinus rhythm was recorded on ECG (Figure 2). Therefore, diagnosis of artifactual atrial flutter was confirmed. Clinical course was further complicated and the patient eventually died 42 days after admission.
Atrial arrhythmias frequently occur in critically ill patients in need of intravenous inotropic support. During the course of continuous venovenous haemofiltration, artifactual flutter waves can be induced by electrical interference caused by static electricity which is generated by the rotational movement of the blood pumps [1]. Tremor-induced ECG artifacts can also impress as pseudoatrial flutter [2].
In conclusion, physicians should be aware of electrocardiographic artifacts. Several causes have been described [3,4]. Misdiagnosis can lead to unnecessary diagnostic or therapeutic interventions such as administration of antiarrhythmics, oral anticoagulation, diagnostic cardiac catheterisation, and even placement of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator [5].

References

  1. Graansma, C.; Liu, T.T.; Tobe, S.W. A simple solution to pseudoarrhythmia during continuous renal replacement therapy. CANNT J 2004, 14, 24–5. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Vanerio, G. Tremor as a cause of pseudoatrial flutter. Am. J. Geriatr. Cardiol. 2007, 16, 106–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bhatia, L.; Turner, D.R. Parkinson’s tremor mimicking ventricular tachycardia. Age Ageing 2005, 34, 410–1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Austin, S.M.; Flach, S.D.; Gaines, C.M. Atrial flutter simulated by a portable compact disk player. Mayo. Clin. Proc. 2007, 82, 383–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Knight, B.P.; Pelosi, F.; Michaud, G.F.; Strickberger, S.A.; Morady, F. Clinical consequences of electrocardiographic artifact mimicking ventricular tachycardia. N. Engl. J. Med. 1999, 341, 1270–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Standard 12-lead ECG during continuous venovenous haemofiltration showing flutter waves in all precordial leads (sweep speed of 25 mm per second).
Figure 1. Standard 12-lead ECG during continuous venovenous haemofiltration showing flutter waves in all precordial leads (sweep speed of 25 mm per second).
Cardiovascmed 11 00064 g001
Figure 2. Standard 12-lead ECG at time haemofiltration was turned off (sweep speed of 25 mm per second).
Figure 2. Standard 12-lead ECG at time haemofiltration was turned off (sweep speed of 25 mm per second).
Cardiovascmed 11 00064 g002

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ritter, S.; Maggiorini, M. Atrial Arrhythmia in the Intensive Care Unit. Cardiovasc. Med. 2008, 11, 64. https://doi.org/10.4414/cvm.2008.01309

AMA Style

Ritter S, Maggiorini M. Atrial Arrhythmia in the Intensive Care Unit. Cardiovascular Medicine. 2008; 11(2):64. https://doi.org/10.4414/cvm.2008.01309

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ritter, Simon, and Marco Maggiorini. 2008. "Atrial Arrhythmia in the Intensive Care Unit" Cardiovascular Medicine 11, no. 2: 64. https://doi.org/10.4414/cvm.2008.01309

APA Style

Ritter, S., & Maggiorini, M. (2008). Atrial Arrhythmia in the Intensive Care Unit. Cardiovascular Medicine, 11(2), 64. https://doi.org/10.4414/cvm.2008.01309

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop