Next Article in Journal
Implementation of a 3D Coupled Hydrodynamic and Contaminant Fate Model for PCDD/Fs in Thau Lagoon (France): The Importance of Atmospheric Sources of Contamination
Previous Article in Journal
Alcohol Trajectories over Three Years in a Swedish Residence Hall Student Population

2010, 7(4), 1448-1466; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph7041448

Review
Alcoholism and Alternative Splicing of Candidate Genes
Department of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, the University of Tokyo, 3-8-1, Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 153-8902, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 26 February 2010; in revised form: 21 March 2010 / Accepted: 23 March 2010 / Published: 30 March 2010

Abstract

:
Gene expression studies have shown that expression patterns of several genes have changed during the development of alcoholism. Gene expression is regulated not only at the level of transcription but also through alternative splicing of pre-mRNA. In this review, we discuss some of the evidence suggesting that alternative splicing of candidate genes such as DRD2 (encoding dopamine D2 receptor) may form the basis of the mechanisms underlying the pathophysiology of alcoholism. These reports suggest that aberrant expression of splice variants affects alcohol sensitivities, and alcohol consumption also regulates alternative splicing. Thus, investigations of alternative splicing are essential for understanding the molecular events underlying the development of alcoholism.
Keywords:
alcoholism; alternative splicing; dopamine; NMDA; GABA; voltage-gated calcium channel; neurexin

1. Introduction

Alternative pre-mRNA splicing makes a large contribution to proteomic diversity. In alternative splicing, various potential splice sites of the pre-mRNA from a single gene are used in various combinations that lead to the translation of several functionally distinct protein isoforms from several different mRNA species. In the brain, the regulation of splice variants modulates protein functions, which can ultimately affect behavior such as alcohol dependence. Alcohol dependence (AD) is a common, chronic and relapsing disorder with an estimated heritability of 40−60% [1]. Family and twin studies have shown that genetic factors contribute to the risk of AD and genetic mapping studies have identified numerous genes associated with this risk [25]. Most of these genes affect ethanol metabolism, ethanol preference, or diverse brain systems, such as the reward system [6,7].
Alterations in expression have been shown to be involved in producing neuroadaptative changes following chronic ethanol consumption [8,9]. A key question in AD is the transition from controlled to compulsive drinking, and development of dependence may be related not only to gene expression modulated through transcriptional regulation but also through alternative splicing of genes, which may produce functionally distinct isoforms.
In this review, we describe several examples of alternative splicing which may affect ethanol preference and consumption. We propose that alternative spliced forms may be important to the development of alcoholism.

2. Ethanol-Associated Genes

2.1. The D2 Dopamine Receptor

The mesolimbic dopamine system plays an important role in the rewarding and reinforcing effect of drugs on the brain [10,11]. It is thought to play a similar role in the rewarding effect of ethanol, as ethanol administration induces the release of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens [12].
Of the five dopamine receptor subtypes, the D2 receptor subtype (DRD2) has been extensively studied in alcoholism [1323]. In rats, a decreased DRD2 density is associated with a preference for ethanol [14], and transient overexpression in the nucleus accumbens attenuated ethanol preference [15]. In humans, positron emission tomography studies have revealed decreased DRD2 availability in the striatum of alcoholics [16,17], and support a hypothesis that a high DRD2 level in the striatum is a protective factor against alcoholism [18]. Moreover, polymorphisms of the DRD2 gene are linked with an altered risk of alcoholism [1923].
Alternative splicing generates two DRD2 isoforms, D2S and D2L. These isoforms differ in that D2L has a sixth exon, which encodes its third cytoplasmic region [24]. Although the two isoforms are co-expressed, D2S is preferentially expressed in dopaminergic neurons in presynaptic regions, such as the substantia nigra and the hypothalamus, and D2L predominates in postsynaptic regions, such as the striatum and the pituitary gland [2527]. In recombinant cell lines and mouse brains, D2L has a lower affinity for dopamine than D2S [24,28,29]. DRD2 is coupled with Gαi, an adenylyl cyclase-inhibiting G protein, and because Gαi binding is mediated by the third cytoplasmic loop of DRD2, D2S and D2L have different specificities for the subtypes of Gαi [3032].
The D2S and D2L isoforms also differ in their effects on downstream protein phosphorylation. D2S has been suggested to decrease the phosphorylation of tyrosine hydroxylase, and D2L has been suggested to increase the dopamine D1 receptor (DRD1)-induced phosphorylation of DARPP-32 (dopamine- and cAMP-regulated phosphoprotein of 32 kDa) [33]. In addition, D2S and D2L have been reported to differ in the levels of their accumulation in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) [34] and in the regulation of their sequestration by G protein-coupled receptor kinases and β-arrestins [35]. Furthermore, although both D2L and D2S participate in the presynaptic inhibition of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) release in the striatum, the presynaptic inhibition of glutamate release is preferentially modulated by D2S [36]. D2L-deficient mice showed distinct pharmacological behavior from DRD2-deficient mice and wild-type mice, suggesting that the D2L splice variant has different functions from D2S in vivo [27,29,37,38].
Ethanol affects the alternative splicing of DRD2 pre-mRNA [39]. Ethanol administration to rats has been reported to increase the D2L/D2S receptor ratio in the pituitary gland, and this effect was reproduced in primary cultures of pituitary cells treated with ethanol. We separately confirmed this effect of ethanol on DRD2 splicing in the human neuroblastoma cell line SH-SY5Y (unpublished data). In pituitary cells, ethanol not only alters DRD2 splicing, but also diminishes the inhibition of prolactin secretion by the DRD2-specific analog bromocriptine [39]. These facts suggest that ethanol suppresses dopamine-induced responses by altering DRD2 splicing. Allelic expression analysis in human postmortem brain tissues and functional magnetic resonance imaging measurements in healthy humans have shown that T carriers of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) rs2283265 and rs1076560, both of which flank DRD2 exon 6, express relatively fewer D2S receptors and exhibit worse performance during working tasks [40]. We have demonstrated that T carriers of SNP rs1076560 have a higher alcoholism risk [22].
These findings suggest that individuals possessing fewer D2S receptors, such as T carriers, have less intense responses to dopamine (like ethanol-preferring rats) and therefore prefer to drink alcohol. Furthermore, this tendency is enhanced through a positive feedback loop in which ethanol administration decreases the number of D2S receptors.

2.2. The N-Methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) Receptor NR1 Subunit

The NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) receptor, an ionotropic glutamate receptor in the central nervous system, is a pivotal target of ethanol [41]. Ethanol attenuates NMDA receptor function in a dose-related fashion in vitro [42,43]. The NMDA receptor is a heteromeric protein composed of at least one NR1 subunit and at least one NR2 subunit. Ethanol appears to bind to the NR1 subunit in a hydrophobic pocket associated with the third transmembrane domain [44]. Ligand binding to the NMDA receptor is up-regulated in rodents chronically treated with ethanol [43,4548] and in postmortem cortical tissue from alcoholic patients [49,50]. This up-regulation of the NMDA receptor reduces ethanol sensitivity and therefore contributes to ethanol tolerance [51].
The NMDA receptor is a cation channel with high Ca2+ permeability. The NR1 subunit is essential for receptor–channel function, and the NR2 subunit modulates the properties of the channel [52]. The recently identified NMDA subunit NR3 decreases NMDA-induced current and Ca2+ permeability [53,54].
The NR1 subunit has eight isoforms generated by alternative splicing of exons 5, 21, and 22. The NR1-a variant lacks exon 5, which encodes the N1 splice cassette that lies in the extracellular N-terminal domain of the NR1 subunit, and NR1-b includes exon 5. Exons 21 and 22 encode the C-terminal splice cassettes C1 and C2, respectively, and are part of the intracellular domain of the NR1 subunit. NR1 splice variants lacking exon 22 contain a C2’ cassette as an additional cassette at their C-terminal end (see Figure 1 in reference [55]). These splice variants vary considerably in their properties and are differentially localized in adult and developing animals [56,57].
These alternative cassettes modulate the properties of the NMDA receptor. The presence of the N1 cassette, which forms a surface loop with structural similarities to polyamines, decreases the affinities of the receptor for NMDA and glutamate [58]. It potentiates the receptor function by relieving the tonic proton inhibition [59] and voltage-independent zinc inhibition [60]. It also accelerates the deactivation time course of NMDA responses when NR1 is co-expressed with the NR2B (but not NR2A) subunit [61,62]. The first C1 cassette includes a calmodulin-binding site, and binding of calmodulin to NR1 inhibits NMDA channel activity [6365]. Although the C1 cassette also has protein kinase C (PKC) phosphorylation sites, and phosphorylation affects the subcellular distribution of NR1 [66], PKC potentiation of the NMDA receptor probably does not occur through direct phosphorylation of the receptor but, rather, through phosphorylation of receptor-associated proteins [67,68].
Interestingly, the NR1 isoforms have differential sensitivities to ethanol-induced inhibition. When expressed singly in Xenopus oocytes, the sensitivity of the NR1-1b, NR1-2b, NR1-1a, and NR1-2a isoforms to ethanol follows the order NR1-1b > NR1-2b > NR1-1a > NR1-2a [69]. In contrast, when all eight NR1 isoforms are co-expressed in various combinations with one of the four NR2 subtypes in human embryonic kidney 293 cells, the sensitivity depends on the combination. For example, the NR1-3b/NR2C, NR1-3b/NR2D, and NR1-4b/NR2C pairs are most weakly inhibited by ethanol (approximately 15% inhibition), and the NR1-2b/NR2C pair is most strongly inhibited by ethanol (>50% inhibition) [70].
Several reports have described the modulation of expression of specific NR1 isoforms by ethanol [54,57,7177]. Some of the reported findings appear to be inconsistent. For example, although mRNA ratio of NR1 splice variants containing exon 5 to those lacking exon 5 (+E5/–E5) decreases in the cortex of rats exposed to ethanol vapor [72] and in mouse fetal cortical neurons treated with ethanol [73], it increases in the striatum of rats chronically treated with ethanol solution [77]. Raeder et al. [77] postulated that this inconsistency arises from differences in the dose, duration of consumption, and route of administration of alcohol. In addition, the effects of ethanol on the expression of NR1 isoforms might differ in each brain region.
Thus, despite this inconsistency, ethanol consumption may increase NR1 isoforms that are weakly inhibited by ethanol. Together with up-regulation of the NMDA receptors [37,3944], this regulation of splice variants should contribute to the reduction of ethanol sensitivity and the induction of ethanol tolerance.

2.3. The GABAA Receptor γ2 Subunit

The ionotropic GABAA receptor, a GABA-gated chloride channel receptor, is involved in the diverse effects of ethanol on the central nervous system [78]. The ionotropic GABAA receptor and the metabotropic GABAB receptor mediate the inhibition of neuronal excitability by GABA. The majority of fast synaptic inhibition is mediated through the GABAA receptor. Acute ethanol administration enhances GABAA receptor activity at intoxicating concentrations, whereas chronic ethanol administration decreases GABAergic function [7981]. Together with up-regulation of the NMDA receptor, this down-regulation of the GABAA receptor contributes to ethanol tolerance, dependence, and withdrawal hyperexcitability. Ethanol directly binds to a pocket located between transmembrane domains of the GABAA receptor, inducing conformational changes [8284]. Dopaminergic neurons in the midbrain are activated not only directly through ethanol exposure, but also indirectly through the down-regulation of GABAergic inhibitory transmission to these neurons [8587].
The GABAA receptor is a heteromer of five subunits. Almost all GABAA receptors consist of two α, two β, and one γ subunit; the most frequent combinations are α1β2γ2, α2β3γ2, and α3β3γ2, which comprise approximately 60, 15, and 10% of GABAA receptor proteins, respectively [88]. Genes for these subunits form clusters on several chromosomal regions; 4p13–q11 (α2, α4, β1, γ1), 5q34–q35 (α1, α6, β2, γ2), 15q11–q13 (α5, β3, γ3), and Xq28 (α3, β4, ɛ1). Mice with knockouts of these genes generally do not exhibit alcohol-preferring behaviors [78]. Moreover, agonists of the GABAA receptor enhance alcohol-drinking behavior, and antagonists inhibit it [8991]. These results illustrate the importance of the GABAA receptor in alcohol consumption.
The GABAA receptor α2 subunit has four major isoforms differing in their combinations of two alternative exons (exon 1A versus exon 1B and exon 9A versus exon 10) and two minor isoforms lacking exon 4 or exon 8 [92]. Two haplotypes of the α2 subunit gene (GABRA2) have been reported to be significant risk factors for AD, although this conclusion is inconsistent with several other studies [93]. Some non-coding variations in the GABRA2 gene have been found to be associated with AD [94]. Because several SNPs are located in exon 8, exon 9, or in the introns flanking these exons, one can speculate that these SNPs affect the alternative splicing of these exons.
The γ2 subunit has two splice variants, one long (γ2L) and one short (γ2S). The γ2L variant differs from the γ2S variant in that it has an eight-amino-acid insert in the intracellular loop between transmembrane domains three and four. Intriguingly, in rats, chronic intermittent ethanol administration decreases the hippocampal ratio of γ2L/γ2S [95]. The γ2L insert modulates GABAA receptor function; it contains a serine residue that is phosphorylated by PKC, reducing the amplitudes of GABA-activated currents [96]. In addition, when γ2L is co-expressed with α and β subunits in Xenopus oocytes, only the γ2L subunit is sensitive to the reinforcing effect of ethanol [97]. It also exhibits accelerated deactivation in human embryonic kidney 293 cells [98]. Knockout mice lacking this insert (γ2L-KO) appear to be unaffected in their electrophysiological and behavioral response to ethanol [99], contrary to the different effects of the isoforms mentioned above. On the other hand, γ2L accumulates at inhibitory postsynaptic sites more effectively than γ2S, and this accumulation is facilitated by PKC phosphorylation of the γ2L insert [100]. Meier and Grantyn argue that γ2S functions sufficiently in γ2L-KO mice only because it does not have to compete with γ2L for gephyrin binding sites and that it actually differs from γ2L in its properties [100]. Moreover, expression of the γ2L and α1 subunits increases during development; they are the predominant isoforms in mature GABAergic synapses [101]. Thus, a reduced γ2L/γ2S ratio probably interferes with the maturation of inhibitory synapses and may indicate a higher risk of alcoholism.

2.4. N-Type and L-type Voltage-gated Ca2+ Channels

Opening of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels depends on the membrane potential. The resulting influx of Ca2+ into the cell triggers various events including neurotransmitter release. Ca2+ channels are composed of at least three subunits (α1, α2δ, and β). The α1 subunit is critical for Ca2+ channel functions, and its various subtypes confer functional diversity.
The N-type Ca2+ channel is involved in the molecular and behavioral effects of ethanol. Acute ethanol exposure inhibits the activity of the N-type channel in PC12 cells [102], whereas chronic ethanol exposure increases the density of N-type channels and therefore increases depolarization-evoked Ca2+ influx [103]. In addition, mice lacking N-type channels exhibit reduced voluntary ethanol consumption and preference [104]. Treatment with the mixed N-type and T-type channel antagonist NP078585 has a phenotypic effect similar to that of ethanol [105].
The α1 subunit of the N-type channel is α12.2, which has three alternative exons (exon 18a, exon 24a, and exon 31a). The splice variants of these exons exhibit functionally diverse Ca2+ signaling in neurons. Exon 31a encodes two amino acids in the IVS3-IVS4 linker, altering the rate of channel opening and the voltage dependence of channel activation [106,107]. Chronic ethanol exposure decreases expression of the variant lacking exon 31a and increases the N-type current [108], suggesting that ethanol facilitates the functions of N-type Ca2+ channels by altering the composition of splice variants.
The L-type channel is also involved in ethanol consumption. Acute ethanol exposure inhibits the L-type channel, whereas chronic ethanol exposure induces a rise in the voltage-gated Ca2+ current, an effect thought to reflect up-regulation of the L-type channel [109,110]. In addition, L-type channel antagonists decrease ethanol withdrawal symptoms and ethanol self-administration in rodents [111,112].
The α1C subunit of the L-type channel has two splice variants, α1C-1 and α1C-2. These variants differ in that α1C-1 has three additional amino acid residues between domains II and III and 28 additional residues in the S3 segment in domain IV. They are differentially expressed in rat brain [113], but little is known about their differences in function. Ethanol treatment in PC12 cells has been reported to increase the level of α1C protein in a PKCδ activity-dependent manner, whereas it increases the mRNA level of α1C-1, but not α1C-2, independent of PKCδ [114]. These results indicate that ethanol up-regulates the L-type channel by increasing expression of the α1C-1 splice variant, in addition to PKCδ-dependent and post-transcriptional regulation.
Ethanol consumption appears to alter the ratios of splice variants, thereby up-regulating N- and L-type calcium channels. This up-regulation appears to induce the neuronal hyperexcitability observed during ethanol withdrawal.

2.5. Large-Conductance Calcium- and Voltage-Activated Potassium Channels (BK)

BK channels are large-conductance calcium- and voltage-activated potassium channels. K+ currents carried by BK channels participate in repolarization and hyperpolarization of action potentials, setting neuron firing properties [115]. BK channels consist of α core and β auxiliary subunits. The α core subunit forms a ion-selective pore, a voltage-sensing module, and a Ca2+-sensing module important for activation of the channel [116].
The activity of BK channels is modified by clinical doses of ethanol. Ethanol exposure potentiates BK activity in cell-free membranes and a cultured explant from rat posterior pituitary gland [117,118]. And BK channels in pituitary tumor (GH3) cells are also activated by ethanol [119]. This potentiation of BK channels in pituitary cells may contribute to the regulation of hormone secretion. Additionally, in a subgroup of primary sensory neurons in rat dorsal root ganglia, the BK potentiation by ethanol reduces neuronal excitability, and therefore, may underlie analgesic action in the peripheral nervous system [120]. Conversely, BK channels in arterial smooth muscle are inhibited by ethanol [121,122]. This ethanol-induced inhibition of BK channels may be a mechanism underlying contraction of vascular smooth muscle. And protracted ethanol exposure decreases ethanol sensitivity and the number of functional BK channels by cellular internalization, resulting in the tolerance to ethanol [118,123].
The response and adaptation of BK channels to ethanol is modulated by the phosphorylation state of the channel protein [124], membrane lipid environment [125127], and the composition of β auxiliary subunits [123,128]. Moreover, altered expression of splice variants encoding the β core subunit is an underlying mechanism for the ethanol tolerance of BK channels [129]. Pietrzykowski and colleagues reported that, in the supraoptic nucleus and the striatal neurons, brief ethanol exposure decreased the splice variants of BK channels that are highly sensitive to ethanol. This down-regulation of alternatively spliced BK variants is caused by selective degradation of pre-existing mRNA, not by the regulation of alternative splicing. Ethanol exposure increases the expression of a miRNA (miR-9) that binds to 3’UTR sequence specific to the ethanol-sensitive splice variants, and therefore, enhances the degradation of these splice variants. And this molecular tolerance of BK channels to ethanol may contribute to the behavioral adaptation to ethanol.

2.6. Neurexin-3

In addition to modulating neurotransmitter receptors and ion channels, ethanol has been reported to inhibit cell–cell adhesion [130] and neurite outgrowth mediated by the L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM) [131]. Ethanol directly binds to L1CAM at a critical domain interface [132] and disrupts its signaling cascade [133], suggesting that cell adhesion molecules are targets of ethanol.
The neuronal proteins known as neurexins function as cell adhesion molecules at presynaptic sites with extracellular binding partners, such as neuroligins, dystroglycan, and neurexophilins [134]. Neurexins modulate postsynaptic differentiation and receptor clustering [135] and perform an essential role in Ca2+-triggered neurotransmitter release by modulating voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels [136138]. The gene for one of the neurexin family proteins, neurexin-3, is associated with nicotine dependence [139,140], opioid dependence [141], and poly-substance abuse [142], and cocaine exposure increases neurexin-3 expression in the globus pallidus of mice [143]. Moreover, neurexin-3 is expressed in neurons projecting to brain regions involved in addictive behaviors, such as the nucleus accumbens and the striatum [144] ( http://www.brain-map.org/).
Neurexin genes have two distinct promoters from which longer forms (α-neurexins) and shorter forms (β-neurexins) are transcribed. In addition, α-neurexins have five alternative splice sites (splice sites 1–5) and β-neurexins have two (splice sites 4 and 5). In this way, an enormously diverse range of neurexin proteins are generated from each neurexin gene, and this diversity modulates synaptic functions [145]. For example, alternative splicing at splice site 4 modulates the binding affinity and specificity for neuroligins [146].
The splice site producing the greatest variety of proteins is splice site 5 of neurexin-3, which includes three exons (exons 22, 23, and 24). Exon 23 is very important because its inclusion confers solubility on neurexin-3 isoforms, and the transcripts lacking this exon encode transmembrane isoforms. SNP rs8019381, which is in the intronic sequence adjacent to the donor splice site of exon 23, is strongly associated with alcohol dependence and forms a haplotype block with rs760288 and rs2293847 [147]. Furthermore, T allele carriers of rs8019381 express fewer soluble isoforms lacking exon 23. Therefore, this polymorphism might increase the risk of alcoholism by affecting the alternative splicing of exon 23 and modulating the synaptic function of neurexin-3.

3. Concluding Remarks

Ethanol consumption can modulate not only the level of total transcripts of multiple genes, but also the ratio of their splice variants. Because splice variants have different functions, the altered expression of splice variants can ultimately affect behavior such as alcohol dependence. Indeed, as mentioned in this review, splice variants of DRD2 may affect ethanol preference by modulating dopamine sensitivity. And lower ethanol-sensitive splice variants of NMDA receptor, GABAA receptor, and ion channels contribute to ethanol tolerance. In addition, splice variants of GABAA receptor, voltage-gated Ca2+ channels, and neurexin-3 possibly contribute to withdrawal symptoms by inducing neuronal hyperexcitability. Furthermore, these propensities for ethanol can enhance ethanol consumption in turn. We propose this positive feedback as a mechanism underlying the development of alcoholism. Moreover, among candidate genes mentioned above, DRD2 and neurexin-3 have polymorphisms that are associated with both the risk of alcoholism and the expression ratio of splice variants. Therefore, polymorphisms without amino acid alteration in multiple candidate genes probably increase the risk of alcoholism by modulating the expression of alternatively spliced variants.
Many intriguing questions remain to be answered, such as how ethanol affects the splicing machinery. The oxidative stress induced in ethanol metabolism might be a factor; ethanol consumption results in the production of reactive oxygen species by the mitochondrial electron transport chain, cytochrome P450 2E1, and activated phagocytes [148], and chemical stresses are known to affect the splicing of specific pre-mRNAs [149].
Another question concerns the genome-wide ethanol-associated changes in alternative splicing. Ethanol-associated splice variants have thus far been investigated only for specific genes, not for the entire genome. For a genome-wide study, next generation sequencing is a useful screening tool for detecting both the altered expression of splice variants and alcoholism-associated polymorphisms. And a custom microarray such as the one generated by Johnson and colleagues [150] is also useful for studies of alternative splicing in multifactorial disorders including alcoholism.

References and Notes

  1. McGue, M. Phenotyping alcoholism. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res 1999, 23, 757–758. [Google Scholar]
  2. Crabbe, JC; Phillips, TJ; Harris, RA; Arends, MA; Koob, GF. Alcohol-related genes: contributions from studies with genetically engineered mice. Addict. Biol 2006, 11, 195–269. [Google Scholar]
  3. Mayfield, RD; Harris, RA; Schuckit, MA. Genetic factors influencing alcohol dependence. Br. J. Pharmacol 2008, 154, 275–287. [Google Scholar]
  4. Gelernter, J; Kranzler, HR. Genetics of alcohol dependence. Hum. Genet 2009, 126, 91–99. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kalsi, G; Prescott, CA; Kendler, KS; Riley, BP. Unraveling the molecular mechanisms of alcohol dependence. Trends Genet 2009, 25, 49–55. [Google Scholar]
  6. Mulligan, MK; Ponomarev, I; Hitzemann, R; Belknap, JK; Tabakoff, B; Harris, RA; Crabbe, JC; Blednov, YA; Grahame, NJ; Phillips, TJ; Finn, DA; Hoffman, PL; Iyer, VR; Koob, GF; Bergeson, SE. Toward understanding the genetics of alcohol drinking through transcriptome meta-analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 2006, 103, 6368–6373. [Google Scholar]
  7. Hodgkinson, CA; Yuan, Q; Xu, K; Shen, PH; Heinz, E; Lobos, EA; Binder, EB; Cubells, J; Ehlers, CL; Gelernter, J; Mann, J; Riley, B; Roy, A; Tabakoff, B; Todd, RD; Zhou, Z; Goldman, D. Addictions biology: haplotype-based analysis for 130 candidate genes on a single array. Alcohol Alcohol 2008, 43, 505–515. [Google Scholar]
  8. Liu, J; Lewohl, JM; Harris, RA; Iyer, VR; Dodd, PR; Randall, PK; Mayfield, RD. Patterns of gene expression in the frontal cortex discriminate alcoholic from nonalcoholic individuals. Neuropsychopharmacology 2006, 31, 1574–1582. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kerns, RT; Ravindranathan, A; Hassan, S; Cage, MP; York, T; Sikela, JM; Williams, RW; Miles, MF. Ethanol-responsive brain region expression networks: implications for behavioral responses to acute ethanol in DBA/2J versus C57BL/6J mice. J. Neurosci 2005, 25, 2255–2266. [Google Scholar]
  10. Tupala, E; Tiihonen, J. Dopamine and alcoholism: neurobiological basis of ethanol abuse. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2004, 28, 1221–1247. [Google Scholar]
  11. Di Chiara, G; Bassareo, V. Reward system and addiction: what dopamine does and doesn't do. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol 2007, 7, 69–76. [Google Scholar]
  12. Yim, HJ; Schallert, T; Randall, PK; Gonzales, RA. Comparison of local and systemic ethanol effects on extracellular dopamine concentration in rat nucleus accumbens by microdialysis. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res 1998, 22, 367–374. [Google Scholar]
  13. Tupala, E; Tiihonen, J. Dopamine and alcoholism: neurobiological basis of ethanol abuse. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2004, 28, 1221–1247. [Google Scholar]
  14. McBride, WJ; Chernet, E; Dyr, W; Lumeng, L; Li, TK. Densities of dopamine D2 receptors are reduced in CNS regions of alcohol-preferring P rats. Alcohol 1993, 10, 387–390. [Google Scholar]
  15. Thanos, PK; Taintor, NB; Rivera, SN; Umegaki, H; Ikari, H; Roth, G; Ingram, DK; Hitzemann, R; Fowler, JS; Gatley, SJ; Wang, GJ; Volkow, ND. DRD2 gene transfer into the nucleus accumbens core of the alcohol preferring and nonpreferring rats attenuates alcohol drinking. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res 2004, 28, 720–728. [Google Scholar]
  16. Hietala, J; West, C; Syvalahti, E; Nagren, K; Lehikoinen, P; Sonninen, P; Ruotsalainen, U. Striatal D2 dopamine receptor binding characteristics in vivo in patients with alcohol dependence. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1994, 116, 285–290. [Google Scholar]
  17. Volkow, ND; Wang, GJ; Fowler, JS; Logan, J; Hitzemann, R; Ding, YS; Pappas, N; Shea, C; Piscani, K. Decreases in dopamine receptors but not in dopamine transporters in alcoholics. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res 1996, 20, 1594–1598. [Google Scholar]
  18. Volkow, ND; Wang, GJ; Begleiter, H; Porjesz, B; Fowler, JS; Telang, F; Wong, C; Ma, Y; Logan, J; Goldstein, R; Alexoff, D; Thanos, PK. High levels of dopamine D2 receptors in unaffected members of alcoholic families: possible protective factors. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 2006, 63, 999–1008. [Google Scholar]
  19. Blum, K; Noble, EP; Sheridan, PJ; Montgomery, A; Ritchie, T; Jagadeeswaran, P; Nogami, H; Briggs, AH; Cohn, JB. Allelic association of human dopamine D2 receptor gene in alcoholism. JAMA 1990, 263, 2055–2060. [Google Scholar]
  20. Parsian, A; Todd, RD; Devor, EJ; O'Malley, KL; Suarez, BK; Reich, T; Cloninger, CR. Alcoholism and alleles of the human D2 dopamine receptor locus. Studies of association and linkage. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1991, 48, 655–663. [Google Scholar]
  21. Noble, EP. The D2 dopamine receptor gene: a review of association studies in alcoholism and phenotypes. Alcohol 1998, 16, 33–45. [Google Scholar]
  22. Sasabe, T; Furukawa, A; Matsusita, S; Higuchi, S; Ishiura, S. Association analysis of the dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2) SNP rs1076560 in alcoholic patients. Neurosci. Lett 2007, 412, 139–142. [Google Scholar]
  23. Smith, L; Watson, M; Gates, S; Ball, D; Foxcroft, D. Meta-analysis of the association of the Taq1A polymorphism with the risk of alcohol dependency: a HuGE gene-disease association review. Am. J. Epidemiol 2008, 167, 125–138. [Google Scholar]
  24. Dal Toso, R; Sommer, B; Ewert, M; Herb, A; Pritchett, DB; Bach, A; Shivers, BD; Seeburg, PH. The dopamine D2 receptor: two molecular forms generated by alternative splicing. EMBO J 1989, 8, 4025–4034. [Google Scholar]
  25. Neve, KA; Neve, RL; Fidel, S; Janowsky, A; Higgins, GA. Increased abundance of alternatively spliced forms of D2 dopamine receptor mRNA after denervation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 1991, 88, 2802–2806. [Google Scholar]
  26. Khan, ZU; Mrzljak, L; Gutierrez, A; de la Calle, A; Goldman-Rakic, PS. Prominence of the dopamine D2 short isoform in dopaminergic pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 1998, 95, 7731–7736. [Google Scholar]
  27. Usiello, A; Baik, JH; Roug Pont, F; Picetti, R; Dierich, A; LeMeur, M; Piazza, PV; Borrelli, E. Distinct functions of the two isoforms of dopamine D2 receptors. Nature 2000, 408, 199–203. [Google Scholar]
  28. Vile, JM; D’Souza, UM; Strange, PG. [3H]nemonapride and [3H]spiperone label equivalent numbers of D2 and D3 dopamine receptors in a range of tissues and under different conditions. J. Neurochem 1995, 64, 940–943. [Google Scholar]
  29. Wang, Y; Xu, R; Sasaoka, T; Tonegawa, S; Kung, MP; Sankoorikal, EB. Dopamine D2 long receptor-deficient mice display alterations in striatum-dependent functions. J. Neurosci 2000, 20, 8305–8314. [Google Scholar]
  30. Senogles, SE. The D2 dopamine receptor isoforms signal through distinct Gi alpha proteins to inhibit adenylyl cyclase. A study with site-directed mutant Gi alpha proteins. J. Biol. Chem 1994, 269, 23120–23127. [Google Scholar]
  31. Senogles, SE; Heimert, TL; Odife, ER; Quasney, MW. A region of the third intracellular loop of the short form of the D2 dopamine receptor dictates Gi coupling specificity. J. Biol. Chem 2004, 279, 1601–1606. [Google Scholar]
  32. Guiramand, J; Montmayeur, JP; Ceraline, J; Bhatia, M; Borrelli, E. Alternative splicing of the dopamine D2 receptor directs specificity of coupling to G-proteins. J. Biol. Chem 1995, 270, 7354–7358. [Google Scholar]
  33. Lindgren, N; Usiello, A; Goiny, M; Haycock, J; Erbs, E; Greengard, P; Hokfelt, T; Borrelli, E; Fisone, G. Distinct roles of dopamine D2L and D2S receptor isoforms in the regulation of protein phosphorylation at presynaptic and postsynaptic sites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 2003, 100, 4305–4309. [Google Scholar]
  34. Prou, D; Gu, WJ; Le Crom, S; Vincent, JD; Salamero, J; Vernier, P. Intracellular retention of the two isoforms of the D(2) dopamine receptor promotes endoplasmic reticulum disruption. J. Cell Sci 2001, 114, 3517–3527. [Google Scholar]
  35. Cho, DI; Beom, S; Van Tol, HH; Caron, MG; Kim, KM. Characterization of the desensitization properties of five dopamine receptor subtypes and alternatively spliced variants of dopamine D2 and D4 receptors. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun 2006, 350, 634–640. [Google Scholar]
  36. Centonze, D; Usiello, A; Gubellini, P; Pisani, A; Borrelli, E; Bernardi, G; Calabresi, P. Dopamine D2 receptor-mediated inhibition of dopaminergic neurons in mice lacking D2L receptors. Neuropsychopharmacology 2002, 27, 723–726. [Google Scholar]
  37. Xu, R; Hranilovic, D; Fetsko, LA; Bucan, M; Wang, Y. Dopamine D2S and D2L receptors may differentially contribute to the actions of antipsychotic and psychotic agents in mice. Mol. Psychiatry 2002, 7, 1075–1082. [Google Scholar]
  38. Hranilovic, D; Bucan, M; Wang, Y. Emotional response in dopamine D2L receptor-deficient mice. Behav. Brain Res 2008, 195, 246–250. [Google Scholar]
  39. Oomizu, S; Boyadjieva, N; Sarkar, DK. Ethanol and estradiol modulate alternative splicing of dopamine D2 receptor messenger RNA and abolish the inhibitory action of bromocriptine on prolactin release from the pituitary gland. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res 2003, 27, 975–980. [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhang, Y; Bertolino, A; Fazio, L; Blasi, G; Rampino, A; Romano, R; Lee, ML; Xiao, T; Papp, A; Wang, D; Sadee, W. Polymorphisms in human dopamine D2 receptor gene affect gene expression, splicing, and neuronal activity during working memory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 2007, 104, 20552–20557. [Google Scholar]
  41. Davis, KM; Wu, JY. Role of glutamatergic and GABAergic systems in alcoholism. J. Biomed. Sci 2001, 8, 7–19. [Google Scholar]
  42. Grant, KA; Lovinger, DM. Cellular and behavioral neurobiology of alcohol: receptor-mediated neuronal processes. Clin. Neurosci 1995, 3, 155–164. [Google Scholar]
  43. Wirkner, K; Poelchen, W; Koles, L; Mlberg, K; Scheibler, P; Allgaier, C; Illes, P. Ethanol-induced inhibition of NMDA receptor channels. Neurochem. Int 1999, 35, 153–162. [Google Scholar]
  44. Ronald, KM; Mirshahi, T; Woodward, JJ. Ethanol inhibition of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors is reduced by site-directed mutagenesis of a transmembrane domain phenylalanine residue. J. Biol. Chem 2001, 276, 44729–44735. [Google Scholar]
  45. Follesa, P; Ticku, MK. NMDA receptor upregulation: molecular studies in cultured mouse cortical neurons after chronic antagonist exposure. J. Neurosci 1996, 16, 2172–2178. [Google Scholar]
  46. Hu, XJ; Follesa, P; Ticku, MK. Chronic ethanol treatment produces a selective upregulation of the NMDA receptor subunit gene expression in mammalian cultured cortical neurons. Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res 1996, 36, 211–218. [Google Scholar]
  47. Hu, XJ; Ticku, MK. Functional characterization of a kindling-like model of ethanol withdrawal in cortical cultured neurons after chronic intermittent ethanol exposure. Brain Res 1997, 767, 228–234. [Google Scholar]
  48. Trevisan, L; Fitzgerald, LW; Brose, N; Gasic, GP; Heinemann, SF; Duman, RS; Nestler, EJ. Chronic ingestion of ethanol up-regulates NMDAR1 receptor subunit immunoreactivity in rat hippocampus. J. Neurochem 1994, 62, 1635–1638. [Google Scholar]
  49. Freund, G; Anderson, KJ. Glutamate receptors in the frontal cortex of alcoholics. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res 1996, 20, 1165–1172. [Google Scholar]
  50. Freund, G; Anderson, KJ. Glutamate receptors in the cingulate cortex, hippocampus, and cerebellar vermis of alcoholics. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res 1999, 23, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  51. Krystal, JH; Petrakis, IL; Mason, G; Trevisan, L; D’Souza, DC. N-methyl-D-aspartate glutamate receptors and alcoholism: reward, dependence, treatment, and vulnerability. Pharmacol. Ther 2003, 99, 79–94. [Google Scholar]
  52. Dunah, AW; Yasuda, RP; Luo, J; Wang, Y; Prybylowski, KL; Wolfe, BB. Biochemical studies of the structure and function of the N-methyl-D-aspartate subtype of glutamate receptors. Mol. Neurobiol 1999, 19, 151–179. [Google Scholar]
  53. Ciabarra, AM; Sullivan, JM; Gahn, LG; Pecht, G; Heinemann, S; Sevarino, KA. Cloning and characterization of chi-1: a developmentally regulated member of a novel class of the ionotropic glutamate receptor family. J. Neurosci 1995, 15, 6498–6508. [Google Scholar]
  54. Nishi, M; Hinds, H; Lu, HP; Kawata, M; Hayashi, Y. Motoneuron-specific expression of NR3B, a novel NMDA-type glutamate receptor subunit that works in a dominant-negative manner. J Neurosci 2001, 21, RC185. [Google Scholar]
  55. Standley, S; Roche, KW; McCallum, J; Sans, N; Wenthold, RJ. PDZ domain suppression of an ER retention signal in NMDA receptor NR1 splice variants. Neuron 2000, 28, 887–898. [Google Scholar]
  56. Dingledine, R; Borges, K; Bowie, D; Traynelis, SF. The glutamate receptor ion channels. Pharmacol. Rev 1999, 51, 7–61. [Google Scholar]
  57. Laurie, DJ; Putzke, J; Zieglgansberger, W; Seeburg, PH; Tolle, TR. The distribution of splice variants of the NMDAR1 subunit mRNA in adult rat brain. Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res 1995, 32, 94–108. [Google Scholar]
  58. Durand, GM; Gregor, P; Zheng, X; Bennett, MV; Uhl, GR; Zukin, RS. Cloning of an apparent splice variant of the rat N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor NMDAR1 with altered sensitivity to polyamines and activators of protein kinase C. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 1992, 89, 9359–9363. [Google Scholar]
  59. Traynelis, SF; Hartley, M; Heinemann, SF. Control of proton sensitivity of the NMDA receptor by RNA splicing and polyamines. Science 1995, 268, 873–876. [Google Scholar]
  60. Traynelis, SF; Burgess, MF; Zheng, F; Lyuboslavsky, P; Powers, JL. Control of voltage-independent zinc inhibition of NMDA receptors by the NR1 subunit. J. Neurosci 1998, 18, 6163–6175. [Google Scholar]
  61. Vicini, S; Wang, JF; Li, JH; Zhu, WJ; Wang, YH; Luo, JH; Wolfe, BB; Grayson, DR. Functional and pharmacological differences between recombinant N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. J. Neurophysiol 1998, 79, 555–566. [Google Scholar]
  62. Rumbaugh, G; Prybylowski, K; Wang, JF; Vicini, S. Exon 5 and spermine regulate deactivation of NMDA receptor subtypes. J. Neurophysiol 2000, 83, 1300–1306. [Google Scholar]
  63. Ehlers, MD; Zhang, S; Bernhadt, JP; Huganir, RL. Inactivation of NMDA receptors by direct interaction of calmodulin with the NR1 subunit. Cell 1996, 84, 745–755. [Google Scholar]
  64. Rycroft, BK; Gibb, AJ. Regulation of single NMDA receptor channel activity by alpha-actinin and calmodulin in rat hippocampal granule cells. J Physiol 2004, 557, 795–808. [Google Scholar]
  65. Ataman, ZA; Gakhar, L; Sorensen, BR; Hell, JW; Shea, MA. The NMDA receptor NR1 C1 region bound to calmodulin: structural insights into functional differences between homologous domains. Structure 2007, 15, 1603–1617. [Google Scholar]
  66. Ehlers, MD; Tingley, WG; Huganir, RL. Regulated subcellular distribution of the NR1 subunit of the NMDA receptor. Science 1995, 269, 1734–1737. [Google Scholar]
  67. Zheng, X; Zhang, L; Wang, AP; Bennett, MV; Zukin, RS. Protein kinase C potentiation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor activity is not mediated by phosphorylation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 1999, 96, 15262–15267. [Google Scholar]
  68. Lan, JY; Skeberdis, VA; Jover, T; Grooms, SY; Lin, Y; Araneda, RC; Zheng, X; Bennett, MV; Zukin, RS. Protein kinase C modulates NMDA receptor trafficking and gating. Nat. Neurosci 2001, 4, 382–390. [Google Scholar]
  69. Koltchine, V; Anantharam, V; Wilson, A; Bayley, H; Treistman, SN. Homomeric assemblies of NMDAR1 splice variants are sensitive to ethanol. Neurosci. Lett 1993, 152, 13–16. [Google Scholar]
  70. Jin, C; Woodward, JJ. Effects of 8 different NR1 splice variants on the ethanol inhibition of recombinant NMDA receptors. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res 2006, 30, 673–679. [Google Scholar]
  71. Winkler, A; Mahal, B; Kiianmaa, K; Zieglgansberger, W; Spanagel, R. Effects of chronic alcohol consumption on the expression of different NR1 splice variants in the brain of AA and ANA lines of rats. Brain. Res. Mol. Brain Res 1999, 72, 166–175. [Google Scholar]
  72. Hardy, PA; Chen, W; Wilce, PA. Chronic ethanol exposure and withdrawal influence NMDA receptor subunit and splice variant mRNA expression in the rat cerebral cortex. Brain Res 1999, 819, 33–39. [Google Scholar]
  73. Kumari, M. Differential effects of chronic ethanol treatment on N-methyl-D-aspartate R1 splice variants in fetal cortical neurons. J. Biol. Chem 2001, 276, 29764–29771. [Google Scholar]
  74. Nagy, J; Kolok, S; Dezso, P; Boros, A; Szombathelyi, Z. Differential alterations in the expression of NMDA receptor subunits following chronic ethanol treatment in primary cultures of rat cortical and hippocampal neurones. Neurochem. Int 2003, 42, 35–43. [Google Scholar]
  75. Honse, Y; Nixon, KM; Browning, MD; Leslie, SW. Cell surface expression of NR1 splice variants and NR2 subunits is modified by prenatal ethanol exposure. Neuroscience 2003, 122, 689–698. [Google Scholar]
  76. Zhou, FC; Anthony, B; Dunn, KW; Lindquist, WB; Xu, ZC; Deng, P. Chronic alcohol drinking alters neuronal dendritic spines in the brain reward center nucleus accumbens. Brain Res 2007, 1134, 148–161. [Google Scholar]
  77. Raeder, H; Holter, SM; Hartmann, AM; Spanagel, R; Moller, HJ; Rujescu, D. Expression of N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor subunits and splice variants in an animal model of long-term voluntary alcohol self-administration. Drug Alcohol Depend 2008, 96, 16–21. [Google Scholar]
  78. Lobo, IA; Harris, RA. GABA(A) receptors and alcohol. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2008, 90, 90–94. [Google Scholar]
  79. Morrow, AL; Montpied, P; Lingford-Hughes, A; Paul, SM. Chronic ethanol and pentobarbital administration in the rat: effects on GABAA receptor function and expression in brain. Alcohol 1990, 7, 237–244. [Google Scholar]
  80. Wan, FJ; Berton, F; Madamba, SG; Francesconi, W; Siggins, GR. Low ethanol concentrations enhance GABAergic inhibitory postsynaptic potentials in hippocampal pyramidal neurons only after block of GABAB receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 1996, 93, 5049–5054. [Google Scholar]
  81. Kumar, S; Porcu, P; Werner, DF; Matthews, DB; Diaz-Granados, JL; Helfand, RS; Morrow, AL. The role of GABA(A) receptors in the acute and chronic effects of ethanol: a decade of progress. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2009, 205, 529–564. [Google Scholar]
  82. Mihic, SJ; Ye, Q; Wick, MJ; Koltchine, VV; Krasowski, MD; Finn, SE; Mascia, MP; Valenzuela, CF; Hanson, KK; Greenblatt, EP; Harris, RA; Harrison, NL. Sites of alcohol and volatile anaesthetic action on GABA(A) and glycine receptors. Nature 1997, 389, 385–389. [Google Scholar]
  83. Mascia, MP; Trudell, JR; Harris, RA. Specific binding sites for alcohols and anesthetics on ligand-gated ion channels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 2000, 97, 9305–9310. [Google Scholar]
  84. Jung, S; Harris, RA. Sites in TM2 and 3 are critical for alcohol-induced conformational changes in GABA receptors. J. Neurochem 2006, 96, 885–892. [Google Scholar]
  85. Gallegos, RA; Lee, RS; Criado, JR; Henriksen, SJ; Steffensen, SC. Adaptive responses of gamma-aminobutyric acid neurons in the ventral tegmental area to chronic ethanol. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther 1999, 291, 1045–1053. [Google Scholar]
  86. Xiao, C; Ye, JH. Ethanol dually modulates GABAergic synaptic transmission onto dopaminergic neurons in ventral tegmental area: role of mu-opioid receptors. Neuroscience 2008, 153, 240–248. [Google Scholar]
  87. Margolis, EB; Fields, HL; Hjelmstad, GO; Mitchell, JM. Delta-opioid receptor expression in the ventral tegmental area protects against elevated alcohol consumption. J. Neurosci 2008, 28, 12672–12681. [Google Scholar]
  88. Michels, G; Moss, SJ. GABAA receptors: properties and trafficking. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol 2007, 42, 3–14. [Google Scholar]
  89. Boyle, AE; Segal, R; Smith, BR; Amit, Z. Bidirectional effects of GABAergic agonists and antagonists on maintenance of voluntary ethanol intake in rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav 1993, 46, 179–182. [Google Scholar]
  90. Nowak, KL; McBride, WJ; Lumeng, L; Li, TK; Murphy, JM. Blocking GABA(A) receptors in the anterior ventral tegmental area attenuates ethanol intake of the alcohol-preferring P rat. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1998, 139, 108–116. [Google Scholar]
  91. Tomkins, DM; Fletcher, PJ. Evidence that GABA(A) but not GABA(B) receptor activation in the dorsal raphe nucleus modulates ethanol intake in Wistar rats. Behav. Pharmacol 1996, 7, 85–93. [Google Scholar]
  92. Tian, H; Chen, HJ; Cross, TH; Edenberg, HJ. Alternative splicing and promoter use in the human GABRA2 gene. Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res 2005, 137, 174–183. [Google Scholar]
  93. Enoch, MA. The role of GABA(A) receptors in the development of alcoholism. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav 2008, 90, 95–104. [Google Scholar]
  94. Edenberg, HJ; Dick, DM; Xuei, X; Tian, H; Almasy, L; Bauer, LO; Crowe, RR; Goate, A; Hesselbrock, V; Jones, K; Kwon, J; Li, TK; Nurnberger, JI, Jr; O'Connor, SJ; Reich, T; Rice, J; Schuckit, MA; Porjesz, B; Foroud, T; Begleiter, H. Variations in GABRA2, encoding the alpha 2 subunit of the GABA(A) receptor, are associated with alcohol dependence and with brain oscillations. Am. J. Hum. Genet 2004, 74, 705–714. [Google Scholar]
  95. Petrie, J; Sapp, DW; Tyndale, RF; Park, MK; Fanselow, M; Olsen, RW. Altered gabaa receptor subunit and splice variant expression in rats treated with chronic intermittent ethanol. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res 2001, 25, 819–828. [Google Scholar]
  96. Krishek, BJ; Xie, X; Blackstone, C; Huganir, RL; Moss, SJ; Smart, TG. Regulation of GABAA receptor function by protein kinase C phosphorylation. Neuron 1994, 12, 1081–1095. [Google Scholar]
  97. Wafford, KA; Burnett, DM; Leidenheimer, NJ; Burt, DR; Wang, JB; Kofuji, P; Dunwiddie, TV; Harris, RA; Sikela, JM. Ethanol sensitivity of the GABAA receptor expressed in Xenopus oocytes requires 8 amino acids contained in the gamma 2L subunit. Neuron 1991, 7, 27–33. [Google Scholar]
  98. Benkwitz, C; Banks, MI; Pearce, RA. Influence of GABAA receptor gamma2 splice variants on receptor kinetics and isoflurane modulation. Anesthesiology 2004, 101, 924–936. [Google Scholar]
  99. Homanics, GE; Harrison, NL; Quinlan, JJ; Krasowski, MD; Rick, CE; de Blas, AL; Mehta, AK; Kist, F; Mihalek, RM; Aul, JJ; Firestone, LL. Normal electrophysiological and behavioral responses to ethanol in mice lacking the long splice variant of the gamma2 subunit of the gamma-aminobutyrate type A receptor. Neuropharmacology 1999, 38, 253–265. [Google Scholar]
  100. Meier, J; Grantyn, R. Preferential accumulation of GABAA receptor gamma 2L, not gamma 2S, cytoplasmic loops at rat spinal cord inhibitory synapses. J. Physiol 2004, 559, 355–365. [Google Scholar]
  101. Roberts, AA; Kellogg, CK. Synchronous postnatal increase in alpha1 and gamma2L GABA(A) receptor mRNAs and high affinity zolpidem binding across three regions of rat brain. Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res 2000, 119, 21–32. [Google Scholar]
  102. Solem, M; McMahon, T; Messing, RO. Protein kinase A regulates regulates inhibition of N- and P/Q-type calcium channels by ethanol in PC12 cells. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther 1997, 282, 1487–1495. [Google Scholar]
  103. McMahon, T; Andersen, R; Metten, P; Crabbe, JC; Messing, RO. Protein kinase C epsilon mediates up-regulation of N-type calcium channels by ethanol. Mol. Pharmacol 2000, 57, 53–58. [Google Scholar]
  104. Newton, PM; Orr, CJ; Wallace, MJ; Kim, C; Shin, HS; Messing, RO. Deletion of N-type calcium channels alters ethanol reward and reduces ethanol consumption in mice. J. Neurosci 2004, 24, 9862–9869. [Google Scholar]
  105. Newton, PM; Zeng, L; Wang, V; Connolly, J; Wallace, MJ; Kim, C; Shin, HS; Belardetti, F; Snutch, TP; Messing, RO. A Blocker of N- and T-type Voltage-Gated Calcium Channels Attenuates Ethanol-Induced Intoxication, Place Preference, Self-Administration, and Reinstatement. J. Neurosci 2008, 28, 11712–11719. [Google Scholar]
  106. Lin, Z; Harris, C; Lipscombe, D. The molecular identity of Ca channel alpha 1-subunits expressed in rat sympathetic neurons. J. Mol. Neurosci 1996, 7, 257–267. [Google Scholar]
  107. Lin, Z; Haus, S; Edgerton, J; Lipscombe, D. Identification of functionally distinct isoforms of the N-type Ca2+ channel in rat sympathetic ganglia and brain. Neuron 1997, 18, 153–166. [Google Scholar]
  108. Newton, PM; Tully, K; McMahon, T; Connolly, J; Dadgar, J; Treistman, SN; Messing, RO. Chronic ethanol exposure induces an N-type calcium channel splice variant with altered channel kinetics. FEBS Lett 2005, 579, 671–676. [Google Scholar]
  109. Wang, X; Wang, G; Lemos, JR; Treistman, SN. Ethanol directly modulates gating of a dihydropyridine-sensitive Ca2+ channel in neurohypophysial terminals. J. Neurosci 1994, 14, 5453–5460. [Google Scholar]
  110. Grant, AJ; Koski, G; Treistman, SN. Effect of chronic ethanol on calcium currents and calcium uptake in undifferentiated PC12 cells. Brain Res 1993, 600, 280–284. [Google Scholar]
  111. Little, HJ; Dolin, SJ; Halsey, MJ. Calcium channel antagonists decrease the ethanol withdrawal syndrome. Life Sci 1986, 39, 2059–2065. [Google Scholar]
  112. Rezvani, AH; Janowsky, DS. Decreased alcohol consumption by verapamil in alcohol preferring rats. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 1990, 14, 623–631. [Google Scholar]
  113. Snutch, TP; Tomlinson, WJ; Leonard, JP; Gilbert, MM. Distinct calcium channels are generated by alternative splicing and are differentially expressed in the mammalian CNS. Neuron 1991, 7, 45–57. [Google Scholar]
  114. Walter, HJ; McMahon, T; Dadgar, J; Wang, D; Messing, RO. Ethanol regulates calcium channel subunits by protein kinase C delta -dependent and -independent mechanisms. J. Biol. Chem 2000, 275, 25717–25722. [Google Scholar]
  115. Sah, P; Faber, ES. Channels underlying neuronal calcium-activated potassium currents. Prog. Neurobiol 2002, 66, 345–353. [Google Scholar]
  116. Cui, J; Yang, H; Lee, US. Molecular mechanisms of BK channel activation. Cell Mol. Life Sci 2009, 66, 852–875. [Google Scholar]
  117. Dopico, AM; Lemos, JR; Treistman, SN. Ethanol increases the activity of large conductance, Ca(2+)-activated K+ channels in isolated neurohypophysial terminals. Mol. Pharmacol 1996, 49, 40–48. [Google Scholar]
  118. Pietrzykowski, AZ; Martin, GE; Puig, SI; Knott, TK; Lemos, JR; Treistman, SN. Alcohol tolerance in large-conductance, calcium-activated potassium channels of CNS terminals is intrinsic and includes two components: decreased ethanol potentiation and decreased channel density. J. Neurosci 2004, 24, 8322–8332. [Google Scholar]
  119. Jakab, M; Weiger, TM; Hermann, A. Ethanol activates maxi Ca2+-activated K+ channels of clonal pituitary (GH3) cells. J. Membr. Biol 1997, 157, 237–245. [Google Scholar]
  120. Gruss, M; Henrich, M; Konig, P; Hempelmann, G; Vogel, W; Scholz, A. Ethanol reduces excitability in a subgroup of primary sensory neurons by activation of BK(Ca) channels. Eur. J. Neurosci 2001, 14, 1246–1256. [Google Scholar]
  121. Dopico, AM. Ethanol sensitivity of BK(Ca) channels from arterial smooth muscle does not require the presence of the beta 1-subunit. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol 2003, 284, C1468–1480. [Google Scholar]
  122. Walters, FS; Covarrubias, M; Ellingson, JS. Potent inhibition of the aortic smooth muscle maxi-K channel by clinical doses of ethanol. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol 2000, 279, C1107–1115. [Google Scholar]
  123. Martin, G; Puig, S; Pietrzykowski, A; Zadek, P; Emery, P; Treistman, S. Somatic localization of a specific large-conductance calcium-activated potassium channel subtype controls compartmentalized ethanol sensitivity in the nucleus accumbens. J. Neurosci 2004, 24, 6563–6572. [Google Scholar]
  124. Liu, J; Asuncion-Chin, M; Liu, P; Dopico, AM. CaM kinase II phosphorylation of slo Thr107 regulates activity and ethanol responses of BK channels. Nat. Neurosci 2006, 9, 41–49. [Google Scholar]
  125. Crowley, JJ; Treistman, SN; Dopico, AM. Cholesterol antagonizes ethanol potentiation of human brain BKCa channels reconstituted into phospholipid bilayers. Mol. Pharmacol 2003, 64, 365–372. [Google Scholar]
  126. Crowley, JJ; Treistman, SN; Dopico, AM. Distinct structural features of phospholipids differentially determine ethanol sensitivity and basal function of BK channels. Mol. Pharmacol 2005, 68, 4–10. [Google Scholar]
  127. Yuan, C; O'Connell, RJ; Wilson, A; Pietrzykowski, AZ; Treistman, SN. Acute alcohol tolerance is intrinsic to the BKCa protein, but is modulated by the lipid environment. J. Biol. Chem 2008, 283, 5090–5098. [Google Scholar]
  128. Martin, GE; Hendrickson, LM; Penta, KL; Friesen, RM; Pietrzykowski, AZ; Tapper, AR; Treistman, SN. Identification of a BK channel auxiliary protein controlling molecular and behavioral tolerance to alcohol. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 2008, 105, 17543–17548. [Google Scholar]
  129. Pietrzykowski, AZ; Friesen, RM; Martin, GE; Puig, SI; Nowak, CL; Wynne, PM; Siegelmann, HT; Treistman, SN. Posttranscriptional regulation of BK channel splice variant stability by miR-9 underlies neuroadaptation to alcohol. Neuron 2008, 59, 274–287. [Google Scholar]
  130. Charness, ME; Safran, RM; Perides, G. Ethanol inhibits neural cell-cell adhesion. J. Biol. Chem 1994, 269, 9304–9309. [Google Scholar]
  131. Bearer, CF; Swick, AR; O'Riordan, MA; Cheng, G. Ethanol inhibits L1-mediated neurite outgrowth in postnatal rat cerebellar granule cells. J. Biol. Chem 1999, 274, 13264–13270. [Google Scholar]
  132. Arevalo, E; Shanmugasundararaj, S; Wilkemeyer, MF; Dou, X; Chen, S; Charness, ME; Miller, KW. An alcohol binding site on the neural cell adhesion molecule L1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 2008, 105, 371–375. [Google Scholar]
  133. Yeaney, NK; He, M; Tang, N; Malouf, AT; O'Riordan, MA; Lemmon, V; Bearer, CF. Ethanol inhibits L1 cell adhesion molecule tyrosine phosphorylation and dephosphorylation and activation of pp60(src). J. Neurochem 2009, 110, 779–790. [Google Scholar]
  134. Craig, AM; Kang, Y. Neurexin-neuroligin signaling in synapse development. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol 2007, 17, 43–52. [Google Scholar]
  135. Graf, ER; Zhang, X; Jin, SX; Linhoff, MW; Craig, AM. Neurexins induce differentiation of GABA and glutamate postsynaptic specializations via neuroligins. Cell 2004, 119, 1013–1026. [Google Scholar]
  136. Missler, M; Zhang, W; Rohlmann, A; Kattenstroth, G; Hammer, RE; Gottmann, K; Shof, TC. Alpha-neurexins couple Ca2+ channels to synaptic vesicle exocytosis. Nature 2003, 423, 939–948. [Google Scholar]
  137. Zhang, W; Rohlmann, A; Sargsyan, V; Aramuni, G; Hammer, RE; Shof, TC; Missler, M. Extracellular domains of alpha-neurexins participate in regulating synaptic transmission by selectively affecting N- and P/Q-type Ca2+ channels. J. Neurosci 2005, 25, 4330–4342. [Google Scholar]
  138. Dudanova, I; Sedej, S; Ahmad, M; Masius, H; Sargsyan, V; Zhang, W; Riedel, D; Angenstein, F; Schild, D; Rupnik, M; Missler, M. Important contribution of alpha-neurexins to Ca2+-triggered exocytosis of secretory granules. J. Neurosci 2006, 26, 10599–10613. [Google Scholar]
  139. Bierut, LJ; Madden, PA; Breslau, N; Johnson, EO; Hatsukami, D; Pomerleau, OF; Swan, GE; Rutter, J; Bertelsen, S; Fox, L; Fugman, D; Goate, AM; Hinrichs, AL; Konvicka, K; Martin, NG; Montgomery, GW; Saccone, NL; Saccone, SF; Wang, JC; Chase, GA; Rice, JP; Ballinger, DG. Novel genes identified in a high-density genome wide association study for nicotine dependence. Hum. Mol. Genet 2007, 16, 24–35. [Google Scholar]
  140. Nussbaum, J; Xu, Q; Payne, TJ; Ma, JZ; Huang, W; Gelernter, J; Li, MD. Significant association of the neurexin-1 gene (NRXN1) with nicotine dependence in European- and African-American smokers. Hum. Mol. Genet 2008, 17, 1569–1577. [Google Scholar]
  141. Lachman, HM; Fann, CS; Bartzis, M; Evgrafov, OV; Rosenthal, RN; Nunes, EV; Miner, C; Santana, M; Gaffney, J; Riddick, A; Hsu, CL; Knowles, JA. Genomewide suggestive linkage of opioid dependence to chromosome 14q. Hum. Mol. Genet 2007, 16, 1327–1334. [Google Scholar]
  142. Liu, QR; Drgon, T; Walther, D; Johnson, C; Poleskaya, O; Hess, J; Uhl, GR. Pooled association genome scanning: validation and use to identify addiction vulnerability loci in two samples. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 2005, 102, 11864–11869. [Google Scholar]
  143. Kelai, S; Maussion, G; Noble, F; Boni, C; Ramoz, N; Moalic, JM; Peuchmaur, M; Gorwood, P; Simonneau, M. Nrxn3 upregulation in the globus pallidus of mice developing cocaine addiction. Neuroreport 2008, 19, 751–755. [Google Scholar]
  144. Lein, ES; Hawrylycz, MJ; Ao, N; Ayres, M; Bensinger, A; Bernard, A; Boe, AF; Boguski, MS; Brockway, KS; Byrnes, EJ; Chen, L; Chen, TM; Chin, MC; Chong, J; Crook, BE; Czaplinska, A; Dang, CN; Datta, S; Dee, NR; Desaki, AL; Desta, T; Diep, E; Dolbeare, TA; Donelan, MJ; Dong, HW; Dougherty, JG; Duncan, BJ; Ebbert, AJ; Eichele, G; Estin, LK; Faber, C; Facer, BA; Fields, R; Fischer, SR; Fliss, TP; Frensley, C; Gates, SN; Glattfelder, KJ; Halverson, KR; Hart, MR; Hohmann, JG; Howell, MP; Jeung, DP; Johnson, RA; Karr, PT; Kawal, R; Kidney, JM; Knapik, RH; Kuan, CL; Lake, JH; Laramee, AR; Larsen, KD; Lau, C; Lemon, TA; Liang, AJ; Liu, Y; Luong, LT; Michaels, J; Morgan, JJ; Morgan, RJ; Mortrud, MT; Mosqueda, NF; Ng, LL; Ng, R; Orta, GJ; Overly, CC; Pak, TH; Parry, SE; Pathak, SD; Pearson, OC; Puchalski, RB; Riley, ZL; Rockett, HR; Rowland, SA; Royall, JJ; Ruiz, MJ; Sarno, NR; Schaffnit, K; Shapovalova, NV; Sivisay, T; Slaughterbeck, CR; Smith, SC; Smith, KA; Smith, BI; Sodt, AJ; Stewart, NN; Stumpf, KR; Sunkin, SM; Sutram, M; Tam, A; Teemer, CD; Thaller, C; Thompson, CL; Varnam, LR; Visel, A; Whitlock, RM; Wohnoutka, PE; Wolkey, CK; Wong, VY; Wood, M; et al. Genome-wide atlas of gene expression in the adult mouse brain. Nature 2007, 445, 168–176. [Google Scholar]
  145. Chih, B; Gollan, L; Scheiffele, P. Alternative splicing controls selective trans-synaptic interactions of the neuroligin-neurexin complex. Neuron 2006, 51, 171–178. [Google Scholar]
  146. Boucard, AA; Chubykin, AA; Comoletti, D; Taylor, P; Shof, TC. A splice code for trans-synaptic cell adhesion mediated by binding of neuroligin 1 to alpha- and beta-neurexins. Neuron 2005, 48, 229–236. [Google Scholar]
  147. Hishimoto, A; Liu, QR; Drgon, T; Pletnikova, O; Walther, D; Zhu, XG; Troncoso, JC; Uhl, GR. Neurexin 3 polymorphisms are associated with alcohol dependence and altered expression of specific isoforms. Hum. Mol. Genet 2007, 16, 2880–2891. [Google Scholar]
  148. Albano, E. Alcohol, oxidative stress and free radical damage. Proc. Nutr. Soc 2006, 65, 278–290. [Google Scholar]
  149. Biamonti, G; Caceres, JF. Cellular stress and RNA splicing. Trends Biochem. Sci 2009, 34, 146–153. [Google Scholar]
  150. Castle, JC; Zhang, C; Shah, JK; Kulkarni, AV; Kalsotra, A; Cooper, TA; Johnson, JM. Expression of 24,426 human alternative splicing events and predicted cis regulation in 48 tissues and cell lines. Nat. Genet 2008, 40, 1416–1425. [Google Scholar]
Back to TopTop