Next Article in Journal
Sedentary Behavior, Physical Inactivity, and the Prevalence of Hypertension, Diabetes, and Obesity During COVID-19 in Brazil
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Spherical Adsorptive Carbon Among Chronic Kidney Disease Patients: A Nationwide Cohort Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessing Annoyance and Sleep Disturbance Related to Changing Aircraft Noise Context: Evidence from Tan Son Nhat Airport
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Noise Annoyance and Sleep Disturbance Due to Road Traffic and Railway Noise in Germany

1
ZEUS GmbH, Centre for Applied Psychology, Environmental and Social Research, 58093 Hagen, Germany
2
Möhler + Partner Ingenieure GmbH, 86153 Augsburg, Germany
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22(9), 1366; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22091366 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 27 March 2025 / Revised: 25 July 2025 / Accepted: 31 July 2025 / Published: 30 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Community Response to Environmental Noise)

Abstract

Environmental noise exposure is omnipresent, but the type of noise source and its appraisal may differ in varying contexts. For instance, studies have found significant differences in annoyance ratings between urbanisation levels. In this article, a re-analysis of existing survey data is presented, assessing noise annoyance and sleep disturbance from road traffic and railway noise in a random sample stratified by rural, suburban, and inner-city areas. Noise exposure was estimated using modelled Lden and Lnight levels. Exposure–response curves showed greater annoyance at lower road traffic noise levels compared to the WHO guidelines (10% highly annoyed at 35 dB Lden vs. WHO 53 dB Lden). Railway noise annoyance aligned with the WHO estimates; however, sleep disturbance was lower at comparable exposure levels (3% highly sleep-disturbed at 53 dB Lnight vs. WHO 44 dB). This re-analysis provides robust exposure–response relationships. The findings indicate higher levels for road traffic noise annoyance in Germany compared to international standards. A resulting policy implication is to link regular population surveys to noise action planning as a form of public participation. This approach enables the development of measures tailored to local conditions and supports the estimation of potential impacts, such as the number of people who may benefit from reduced noise exposure.
Keywords: noise annoyance; sleep disturbance; transportation noise; exposure–response assessment; urbanisation noise annoyance; sleep disturbance; transportation noise; exposure–response assessment; urbanisation

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Benz, S.L.; Kuhlmann, J.; Bilik, J.; Liepert, M.; Schreckenberg, D. Noise Annoyance and Sleep Disturbance Due to Road Traffic and Railway Noise in Germany. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22, 1366. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22091366

AMA Style

Benz SL, Kuhlmann J, Bilik J, Liepert M, Schreckenberg D. Noise Annoyance and Sleep Disturbance Due to Road Traffic and Railway Noise in Germany. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2025; 22(9):1366. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22091366

Chicago/Turabian Style

Benz, Sarah Leona, Julia Kuhlmann, Jonas Bilik, Manfred Liepert, and Dirk Schreckenberg. 2025. "Noise Annoyance and Sleep Disturbance Due to Road Traffic and Railway Noise in Germany" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 22, no. 9: 1366. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22091366

APA Style

Benz, S. L., Kuhlmann, J., Bilik, J., Liepert, M., & Schreckenberg, D. (2025). Noise Annoyance and Sleep Disturbance Due to Road Traffic and Railway Noise in Germany. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 22(9), 1366. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22091366

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop