Next Article in Journal
“Slowly but Steadily, You’re Running Out of Steam”: Aging Parents’ Caregiving Experiences Through Photovoice
Previous Article in Journal
“If You Haven’t Slept a Lot (…) You Don’t Want to Go Out for a Run, You Don’t Want to Ride a Bike, You Just Kind of Sit and You Just (…) Do Nothing”—Perceptions of 24-Hour Movement Behaviours Among Adolescents Living with Type 1 Diabetes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Relationships Between Road and Railway Noise Exposure and Self-Reported Sleep Disturbance for Detached Houses in Japan
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 22
Issue 8
10.3390/ijerph22081296
Review Report
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Assessing Annoyance and Sleep Disturbance Related to Changing Aircraft Noise Context: Evidence from Tan Son Nhat Airport

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22(8), 1296; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22081296
by Thulan Nguyen 1,*, Tran Thi Hong Nhung Nguyen 2, Makoto Morinaga 3, Yasuhiro Hiraguri 4 and Takashi Morihara 5
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22(8), 1296; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22081296
Submission received: 26 June 2025 / Revised: 5 August 2025 / Accepted: 10 August 2025 / Published: 19 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Community Response to Environmental Noise)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

It should be detailed how the noise assessment tests were performed.
It should be detailed how the acoustic measurements were performed, how and where the microphone was positioned. The number of measurement points and meteorological conditions (wind and direction) should be described.
Highlight how Lden and Lnight were assessed.
A map of the distribution of Lden and Lnight is missing.
The paper should be simplified.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Should the authors' contributions to the topic be highlighted?
Your results should be better compared with those of other authors.

Row 104 - Adjust caption position
The same for Fig. 2 and Fig. 3.

Explain in more detail how you obtained the values in Fig. 2 and Fig. 3.

When you administered the questionnaires, how were the participants trained?

Were the tests conducted authentically?

How did you calculate Lden and Lnight?

How did you consider traffic noise or other noises?

Why is only airplane noise annoying?

Airports are generally closed at night.  Why is the airport open in this city during the night?

Aren't there laws prohibiting night flights?

How many points did you consider in the noise measurements?
Did you measure wind speed?

What is the effect of rain?
Did you consider conditions that could alter the measurements?
This part needs clarification.

Row 208.
Explain more clearly how you performed the Relationship Between Exposure Levels and Annoyance.

Row 379. Explain more clearly how you obtained the Annoyance model.

Expand the discussion paragraph.

Increase the references, especially highlighting similar studies.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Accept

 

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Accept

Back to TopTop