Abstract
This study explored the relationship between variables emphasized in the theory’s first step of the three-step theory (3ST)—psychache, hopelessness, and their interaction—to suicide-related variables (i.e., lifetime suicidal ideation and attempt, past-year suicidal ideation, communication of suicidal thoughts, and self-reported future suicide attempt likelihood). Chinese undergraduate students (N = 11,399; mean age = 20.69 ± 1.35) from seven provinces participated in this cross-sectional survey. They answered the Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised, Psychache Scale, and Beck Hopelessness Scale. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to examine the association between psychache, hopelessness, and hopelessness × psychache interaction on the outcome variables. Bivariate analyses showed that psychache and hopelessness were correlated with suicidal ideation and behaviors. In multiple regression models, the interaction between psychache and hopelessness was significantly associated with past-year suicidal ideation and self-report chances of a future suicide attempt, p < 0.001, though effect sizes for the interaction term were small. The results are broadly consistent with the 3ST’s proposition of how the combination of pain and hopelessness is related to various suicide-related variables. The low prevalence of suicide-related communication should inform future suicide prevention measures by encouraging help-seeking. Psychache as a correlate of the self-reported likelihood of a future attempt could be further investigated.
1. Introduction
Suicide is a leading cause of death among young persons within the 15–29-year-old age bracket [1]. A majority of university students fall within this age range, and they have been found to be at an increased risk of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts compared to the general population [2]. According to the meta-analysis conducted by Mortier et al. [3], the pooled prevalence was 22.3% for lifetime suicidal ideation, 3.2% for lifetime suicide attempts, and 1.2% reported having a suicide attempt in the past year. In China, the pooled prevalence was 10.7% for suicidal ideation [2] and 2.8% for suicide attempts [4]. University students may be at a higher risk of having suicidal ideation and behaviors as they are at the crossroads of adaptation to university life [5]. A meta-analysis further revealed that psychological factors such as the presence of somatization, anxiety, and mental disorders contributed to the highest odds of having suicidal ideation among Chinese university students [6].
Psychological pain (or psychache) and hopelessness have been consistently found to be significant correlates of and risk factors for suicidal ideation and attempts. Psychache is a term that Edwin Shneidman conceptualized and used to describe the psychological pain and emotional turmoil that underlie suicidal behavior [7]. He suggested that psychache is a common stimulus for suicide and identified it as one of the ten commonalities of suicide. A meta-analysis presented that psychache was higher among those who had suicidal ideation and suicide attempts, with greater effect sizes for the former [8]. A longitudinal study has also found that psychache and suicidal ideation were reciprocally associated over time [9]. In China, psychache has been shown to mediate the relationship between psychological strain and suicidal ideation [10].
In the field of suicidology, the concept of hopelessness has its roots in the work of Aaron T. Beck and his colleagues. Beck proposed that hopelessness is a common emotional state associated with suicide. An individual with hopelessness may hold negative views of the self, expect negative outcomes in the future, or believe that one’s current situation will not improve over time [11]. A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies found that higher hopelessness scores predicted a 2.19-fold higher weighted mean odds of having suicidal ideation [12]. Similarly, a psychological autopsy study among Chinese older adults found that hopelessness predicted the highest odds ratio (OR: 7.25) for suicide risk among a number of risk factors, including depression [13].
Among the contemporary suicide theories, the three-step theory (3ST) [14] specifies in greater detail the way in which pain and hopelessness combine to lead to suicidal desire. This theory proposes that suicidal desire develops due to the combination of pain (usually psychological) and hopelessness. The theory also states that suicidal desire is more intense when pain exceeds or overwhelms one’s connectedness (to people, valued jobs or roles, or any sense of purpose or meaning) and that intense suicidal desire progresses to action when the dispositional, acquired, and/or practical characteristics of the individual have influenced their capability to make a potentially lethal suicide attempt [14].
The 3ST is relatively new and has been tested in a few contexts (see review by Anderson and Happ [15] and Klonsky et al. [16]), including among university students. In the study by Klonsky and May [14], a model including, pain, hopelessness, and their interaction accounted for 41% of the variance in suicidal desire. This figure was 56% in a large study of UK university students (N = 665) [17]. In China, only one extant study, by Yang and colleagues [18], has tested the 3ST. Yang et al.’s study [18] with Chinese college students (N = 1097) also found a statistically significant interaction between psychological pain and hopelessness in predicting current suicidal ideation, although the model accounted for only 12% of the variance in suicidal ideation. In addition, one of the study limitations stated was the relatively small number of participants with a suicide attempt history (N = 42; 3.8%).
Improved understanding of the development of suicidal ideation is an important first step in suicide prevention. The influence of psychache and hopelessness in a Chinese, non-Western sample could provide local insight into the utility of these suicide risk factors. While the 3ST has been tested in China with moderate support, there have been few large-scale studies that explored the influence of psychache and hopelessness on various outcomes related to suicide risk. Therefore, the aim of this paper was to explore the association between psychache and hopelessness with a spectrum of suicidal thoughts and behaviors (lifetime suicidal ideation and suicide attempt, past-year suicidal ideation, communication of a suicide plan, and likelihood of a future suicide attempt) in a large sample of Chinese university students.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design
This was a cross-sectional survey study of undergraduate students in seven provinces, municipalities, or autonomous regions in China. This design was used to gather data from various undergraduate students and universities in China in order to identify associations between psychache, hopelessness, and suicidality at a specific time point in this population.
2.2. Data Collection
We conveniently sampled one university each from Jilin, Qinghai, Shandong and Shaanxi provinces, Ningxia and Xinjiang autonomous regions, and the municipality of Shanghai. In terms of region, Shanghai and Shandong are situated in East China; Shaanxi, Qinghai, Ningxia, and Xinjiang are in Northwest China; and Jilin is located in Northeast China. Each university was chosen using convenience sampling; the universities were associated with some of the authors or their collaborators. The criterion for inclusion was that the university should offer undergraduate programs of study.
Data were collected through pen-and-paper surveys from students enrolled in undergraduate programs from the seven universities. Participant inclusion criteria were being enrolled in an undergraduate program and aged 18 years old or above, while those who were unwilling or unable to provide informed consent were excluded. Quota sampling by year of study was used to ensure that the sample has a fair representation of classes from Year 1 to Year 3 and above, including medical students who take up to five years to complete their undergraduate degree. Undergraduate students were invited to join the study during class by trained research assistants. Participants were first briefed about the aims of the research. They were informed that participation was voluntary. Those who were eligible provided written informed consent. After providing consent, they completed the anonymous questionnaires in approximately half an hour, after which the questionnaires were collected by the research assistant. Participants were given a small gift equivalent to USD 1 as a token of appreciation.
2.3. Ethical Considerations
This study received ethical approval from the institutional review board of the School of Public Health, Shandong University (No. 20161103). Hotlines providing counseling services were included in the information sheet according to their availability in each province so that students who experienced any psychological distress during or after the questionnaire administration could contact those services.
2.4. Measurements
2.4.1. Demographics
The following demographic data were collected: age, gender, ethnicity, province, and year of study.
2.4.2. Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R)
The SBQ-R, a 4-item questionnaire, was developed to measure a range of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors and was validated in clinical and nonclinical settings [19]. Lifetime suicidal ideation and lifetime suicide attempt were determined by the first item, “Have you ever seriously thought about suicide?”. Participants answer on a range of statements coded 1 = “Never” to 4b = “I have attempted to kill myself and really hoped to die”. A higher score denoted a greater severity of suicidal ideation and attempt. The second item measured the frequency of past-year suicidal ideation, with responses ranging from 1 = “Never” to 5 = “Very often (5 or more times)”. The third item measured communication of a suicide plan, with responses ranging from 1 = “No” to 3b = “Yes, more than once, and really wanted to do it”. Item 4 measured the likelihood of a future suicide attempt, with responses ranging from 0 = “Never” to 6 = “Very likely”. Higher scores on each item denoted a greater severity of suicidal thoughts or behaviors. In a study on suicide risk among China university students, the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the scale score was 0.79 [20]. In this study, the Cronbach’s α of the scale score was α = 0.75.
2.4.3. Psychache Scale
The Psychache Scale [21], consisting of 13 items, measures lifetime psychological pain. Items on the scale are scored from 1 = “Never or strongly disagree” to 5 = “Always or strongly agree”. The scale scores have adequate psychometric properties, with internal reliability consistency coefficients > 0.90 when tested among university students. Among Chinese university students, the internal consistency estimate of Cronbach’s α was 0.94 [22]. In this study, the Cronbach’s α of the scale score was α = 0.96.
2.4.4. Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS)
The Beck Hopelessness Scale, a 20-item questionnaire, measures negative attitudes regarding the short- and long-range future [23]. Participants responded on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 = “Strongly agree” to 5 = “Strongly disagree”. In a study among China college students, the internal consistency estimate of Cronbach’s α was 0.81 and 0.84 [24]. In this study, the Cronbach’s α of the scale score was α = 0.81.
2.5. Data Analysis
Descriptive statistics were used to summarize continuous data, while categorical variables were presented by their frequency and percentage. Normality tests were conducted using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test and inspection of the histogram and Q–Q plot to ascertain the data distribution of the four items in the SBQ-R. As the data for all items were skewed to the left, Spearman’s rank correlation analyses were used to examine the bivariate relationship between psychache, hopelessness, and the four items on the SBQ-R.
Multiple linear regression analyses were conducted to determine whether psychache (total scale score of the Psychache Scale) and hopelessness (total scale score of the BHS) independently and interactively (hopelessness × psychache) were associated with different suicide-related behavior parameters (item scores of the SBQ-R), controlling for age, gender, and province. To address the issue of multi-collinearity, the predictors were centered (i.e., mean centering).
Cases with missing data were deleted listwise. Diagnostic testing was conducted for outliers, influential points, linearity, and multi-collinearity. A p-value of <0.05 was deemed statistically significant for all 2-sided tests. The analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics (version 27, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA, 2020).
3. Results
A total of 11,399 participants (mean age = 20.69 ± 1.35) were included for analysis after excluding missing data (N = 1988, 14%) from 13,387 participants who had responded to the questionnaire. The main demographic variables included gender, ethnicity, province, and year of study. Most of the participants were female (n = 6987, 61.3%), and the rest were males (n = 4412, 38.7%). In terms of ethnicity, a majority were of Han ethnicity (n = 8636, 75.8%), while the rest were non-Han (n = 2763, 24.2%). About one-third (n = 3880, 34.1%) were first-year university students, followed by second-year students (n = 3834, 33.7%), and those in their third year and above (n = 3667, 32.3%). Participants were well distributed over the three years. In terms of province/autonomous regions, 16.4% (n = 1869) were from the Jilin province, while the province with the least participants was Shandong (n = 1375, 12.1%). The above information on the composition of the participants reveals a wide range of demographic characteristics. A total of 2274 participants (19.9%) reported past-year suicidal ideation, 3006 (26.4%) reported lifetime suicidal ideation, 226 (2.0%) reported lifetime suicide attempts, 1539 (13.5%) communicated suicide plan, and 655 (5.7%) indicated a self-reported likelihood of a future suicide attempt. The participants’ demographic characteristics and suicidality are presented in Table 1.
Table 1.
Demographic characteristics and suicidality of the participants (N = 11,399).
Bivariate correlations using Spearman’s rank analysis were determined, which revealed a moderate positive correlation between psychache and hopelessness (ƥ = 0.50, p < 0.001). Psychache and hopelessness also correlated significantly with all items on the SBQ-R (Table 2).
Table 2.
Spearman rank correlation of hopelessness, psychache, and items on the Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R).
Table 3 shows the full model results for the multiple linear regression analyses predicting lifetime ideation and attempt, past-year suicidal ideation, communication of a suicide plan, and self-reported likelihood of a future attempt, adjusting for gender and age. The results show that psychache, hopelessness, and their interaction term could best predict past-year suicidal ideation in a model that accounted for about 14% of the variance in past-year suicidal ideation. The predictive power was weaker for lifetime suicidal ideation and suicide attempts and self-reported likelihood of a future attempt; there was no predictive power at all for communication of a suicide plan (Table 3).
Table 3.
Linear regression analyses on factors associated with SBQ-R parameters.
4. Discussion
This study aimed to examine the association between psychache, hopelessness, and their interaction with a range of suicide-related variables. The multiple regression models showed that psychache, hopelessness, and their interaction were associated with past-year suicidal ideation, lifetime ideation and attempt, and self-reported likelihood of a future attempt.
The findings extend knowledge about Klonsky’s 3ST model, which states that the combination of psychological pain and hopelessness causes the development of suicidal ideation [14]. While the 3ST proposition is best tested by examining the relationship of pain and hopelessness to current suicidal ideation, or to subsequent suicidal ideation over very short time periods such as hours or minutes (see Klonsky et al. [16] for elaboration), it is also useful to explore how pain and hopelessness relate to other suicide-related outcomes. Results regarding past-year suicidal ideation, i.e., higher hopelessness × psychache was associated with higher past-year ideation, are largely consistent with the 3ST’s proposition that pain and hopelessness motivation the desire for suicide (but not necessarily one’s decision to communicate about that motivation). At the same time, the interactive models in the present paper accounted for much less variance in the suicide-related outcome variables compared to the 41% and 56% variances found in the studies by Klonsky and May [14] and Dhingra et al. [17], respectively. This may be because those studies examined a timeframe consistent with the theory (current pain and hopelessness relating to current suicidal ideation), whereas the present study examined lifetime, past-year, and potential future outcomes.
At the same time, our results are comparable compared to another Chinese study [18] which had reported a 12% variance in current suicidal ideation explained by hopelessness × psychache. The lower variances obtained in these two studies, regardless of past-year or current ideation status, may point to the need to examine developmental and cultural factors that may influence China students differently than the Western samples. For example, a meta-analysis on factors that influenced suicidal ideation among Chinese college students concluded that academic pressure and family relationships were important risk factors for suicidal ideation [6]. Studies have also found that other emotions may trump the influence of hopelessness on suicidal ideation among Chinese students, such as indebtedness [25] and filial piety [26], both of which are related to Confucianism and require further investigation among Chinese undergraduates.
A noteworthy finding of our study was that more than a tenth of respondents (13.5%) indicated that they had communicated a suicide plan at some point in the past year. When taking into account only those who reported lifetime suicidal ideation, 45.3% had communicated their suicide plan to others. This percentage is lower than the proportions of college students who disclosed their suicidal ideation in a study among college students in the US, which indicated a percentage between 53.4% and 53.6% [27], and among Australian adults, at 60.5% [28]. Chinese university students may be less likely to disclose having psychosocial issues probably due, in no small part, to its associated stigma [29], and this is also partially attributable to the Chinese ‘face-saving’ culture [30].
The findings also showed that the interaction between current hopelessness and psychache was associated with self-reported likelihood of future suicide attempts. The participants’ assessment of the likelihood of attempting suicide in the future could be indicative of a current suicidal desire, which makes a future suicide possible. Indeed, previous research has found a relationship of pain and hopelessness to future suicidal ideation or attempts [31]. Even though according to the 3ST, one’s suicidal desire at a given moment is driven by their pain and hopelessness at that moment, pain and hopelessness might have value as a risk factor for future suicidal desire by predicting an increased likelihood of future pain and hopelessness.
The fact that psychache was associated with suicide intention communication should be noted as mental anguish seemed to be associated with individuals seeking help or relief through communicating their suicide intention, and this suggested the need to implement adequate prevention strategies among Chinese undergraduates. We could perhaps target the detection of suicide communication as a psychosocial preventive strategy, considering the fact that about half of suicide decedents communicated suicide intention before death [32,33]. This is because if suicidal intent and tendencies are more effectively understood, those who receive the suicide communication could therefore react with offers of support and help in coping or referral to counselling or psychiatric services.
This study holds significant importance in understanding the relationship between psychache, hopelessness, and suicidal ideation and behaviors among Chinese undergraduate students. The findings suggest that the interaction between psychache and hopelessness was significantly associated with suicidal ideation, which provides support for the first step of the three-step theory (3ST) positing that suicidal desire develops when pain and hopelessness combine. The study results provide actionable insights for counselors or clinicians working with undergraduate students. For example, when a Chinese undergraduate student scores high in psychache and hopelessness, this suggests a heightened risk for current suicidal ideation. In such cases, service providers should assess and monitor the wish to attempt suicide in the future. This study also reveals an essential issue in this context, where only a low proportion of participants who reported suicidal thoughts in the past year disclosed suicide plans. This emphasizes the need for enhanced gatekeeper training among university administrators, educators, and students, which may need to be implemented to more effectively detect any students who may be psychologically distressed and in need of help. Such training can facilitate more effective recognition of psychache and hopelessness among students, enabling timely intervention and support. Help-seeking could also be encouraged by destigmatizing mental health issues and suicidality to potentially reduce the risk of suicide among this population.
This study has a few limitations inherent to a cross-sectional survey design, namely that inferences of causality could not be derived, and self-reported mental conditions could not be verified. The data are not representative of Chinese undergraduate students as one university was chosen from each province. The sampling of universities was carried out using the convenience sampling method. We did not capture the students’ field of study, and not all students enrolled in the sampled universities were made aware of the study availability due to the sampling method. Since we also did not capture the total number of undergraduate students enrolled in the seven universities, the proportion of students who answered the survey could not be estimated. Important cultural aspects, such as the strength of Confucian beliefs and filial piety, were not measured in this study. In addition, we did not explore factors that may lead to the occurrence of psychache and hopelessness, such as the influence of psychological strains. Future studies should take into consideration the quality of important familial relationships and the role of life philosophies in shaping and influencing suicidal ideation and behaviors.
5. Conclusions
In conclusion, pain and hopelessness are important risk factors for suicidality among Chinese undergraduates. These findings highlight the need for comprehensive, multipronged approaches that provide support, skills, and resources to alleviate suffering, restore hope, and hopefully reduce suicide risk on Chinese university campuses.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, E.D.K., K.K., J.M.Y.H., C.J., J.Z. and B.L.; data curation, J.M.Y.H., C.J., J.Z. and B.L.; formal analysis, C.S.S., E.D.K. and J.M.Y.H.; funding acquisition, K.K.; investigation, C.J., J.Z. and B.L.; methodology, C.S.S., C.J., J.Z. and B.L.; project administration, K.K., C.J., J.Z. and B.L.; resources, E.D.K. and B.L.; software, B.L.; supervision, K.K.; writing—original draft preparation, C.S.S., E.D.K., K.K., J.M.Y.H., C.M.H.C., M.N.F., N.I., Y.K.T., C.J., J.Z. and B.L.; writing—review and editing, C.S.S., E.D.K., K.K., J.M.Y.H., C.M.H.C., M.N.F., N.I., Y.K.T., C.J., J.Z. and B.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the institutional review board of the School of Public Health, Shandong University (No. 20161103).
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.
Acknowledgments
We wish to thank all the participants.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- World Health Organization. Suicide. 2021. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/suicide (accessed on 4 February 2023).
- Li, Z.Z.; Li, Y.M.; Lei, X.Y.; Zhang, D.; Liu, L.; Tang, S.Y.; Chen, L. Prevalence of suicidal ideation in Chinese college students: A meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e104368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mortier, P.; Cuijpers, P.; Kiekens, G.; Auerbach, R.P.; Demyttenaere, K.; Green, J.G.; Kessler, R.C.; Nock, M.K.; Bruffaerts, R. The prevalence of suicidal thoughts and behaviours among college students: A meta-analysis. Psychol. Med. 2018, 48, 554–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, L.S.; Zhang, Z.H.; Sun, L.; Sun, Y.H.; Ye, D.Q. Prevalence of suicide attempts among college students in China: A meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0116303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhao, J.; Chi, Y.; Ju, Y.; Liu, X.; Wang, J.; Liu, X.; Lew, B.; Siau, C.S.; Jia, C. Shame and suicidal ideation among undergraduates in China: The mediating effect of thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kou, M.R.; Feng, Z.Y.; Yang, X.G. Influencing factors of suicidal ideation of college students: A meta-analysis. Chin. Prev. Med. 2018, 19, 520–526. [Google Scholar]
- Shneidman, E.S. Definition of Suicide; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1985. [Google Scholar]
- Ducasse, D.; Holden, R.R.; Boyer, L.; Artero, S.; Calati, R.; Guillaume, S.; Courtet, P.; Olie, E. Psychological pain in suicidality: A meta-analysis. J. Clin. Psychiatry 2017, 78, 16108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, X.; You, J.; Ren, Y.; Zhou, J.; Sun, R.; Liu, X.; Leung, F. A longitudinal study testing the role of psychache in the association between emotional abuse and suicidal ideation. J. Clin. Psychol. 2019, 75, 2284–2292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ha, L.; Chang, Q.; Wang, Z. The mediating effect of psychache on the relationship between psychological strains and suicidal behaviors among Chinese Hui and Han medical students. SAGE Open 2020, 10, 2158244020942158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beck, A.T. Thinking and depression. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1963, 9, 326–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ribeiro, J.D.; Huang, X.; Fox, K.R.; Franklin, J.C. Depression and hopelessness as risk factors for suicide ideation, attempts and death: Meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Br. J Psychiatry 2018, 212, 279–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niu, L.; Jia, C.; Ma, Z.; Wang, G.; Sun, B.; Zhang, D.; Zhou, L. Loneliness, hopelessness and suicide in later life: A case-control psychological autopsy study in rural China. Epidemiol. Psychiatr. Sci. 2020, 29, e119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klonsky, E.D.; May, A.M. The three-step theory (3ST): A new theory of suicide rooted in the “ideation-to-action” framework. Int. J. Cogn. Ther. 2015, 8, 114–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anderson, A.M.; Happ, M.B. The three-step theory of suicide: Analysis and evaluation. Adv. Nurs. Sci. 2021, 44, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klonsky, E.D.; Pachkowski, M.C.; Shahnaz, A.; May, A.M. The three-step theory of suicide: Description, evidence, and some useful points of clarification. Prev. Med. 2021, 152, 106549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dhingra, K.; Klonsky, E.D.; Tapola, V. An empirical test of the Three-Step Theory of suicide in UK University students. Suicide Life Threat. Behav. 2019, 49, 478–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, L.; Liu, X.; Chen, W.; Li, L. A test of the three-step theory of suicide among Chinese people: A study based on the ideation-to-action framework. Arch. Suicide Res. 2019, 23, 648–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osman, A.; Bagge, C.L.; Gutierrez, P.M.; Konick, L.C.; Kopper, B.A.; Barrios, F.X. The Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R): Validation with clinical and non-clinical samples. Assessment 2001, 8, 443–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, R.; Zhu, H.; Wang, Z.J.; Jiang, C.L. A large sample survey of suicide risk among university students in China. BMC Psychiatry 2021, 21, 474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holden, R.R.; Mehta, K.; Cunningham, E.J.; McLeod, L.D. Development and preliminary validation of a scale of psychache. Can. J. Behav. Sci. 2001, 33, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.; Fu, R.; Zou, Y.; Cui, Y. Predictive roles of three-dimensional psychological pain, psychache, and depression in suicidal ideation among Chinese college students. Front. Psychol. 2017, 8, 1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beck, A.T.; Steer, R.A.; Beck, J.S.; Newman, C.F. Hopelessness, depression, suicidal ideation, and clinical diagnosis of depression. Suicide Life Threat. Behav. 1993, 23, 139–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tao, Y.; Niu, H.; Hou, W.; Zhang, L.; Ying, R. Hopelessness during and after the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown among Chinese college students: A longitudinal network analysis. J. Clin. Psychol. 2023, 79, 748–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fwu, B.J.; Wei, C.F.; Chen, S.W.; Wang, H.H. To work hard or not? The conflicting effects of negative emotions on persistence after academic failure in a Confucian heritage cultural context. In Emotions in Learning, Teaching, and Leadership; Chen, J., King, R.B., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK, 2020; pp. 3–17. [Google Scholar]
- Leung, J.T. Perceived parental sacrifice, filial piety and hopelessness among Chinese adolescents: A cross-lagged panel study. J. Adolesc. 2020, 81, 39–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Luca, S.; Yan, Y.; Lytle, M.; Brownson, C. The associations of race/ethnicity and suicidal ideation among college students: A latent class analysis examining precipitating events and disclosure patterns. Suicide Life Threat. Behav. 2014, 44, 444–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Calear, A.L.; Batterham, P.J. Suicidal ideation disclosure: Patterns, correlates and outcome. Psychiatry Res. 2019, 278, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gearing, R.E.; Brewer, K.B.; Cheung, M.; Leung, P.; Chen, W.; He, X. Suicide in China: Community attitudes and stigma. OMEGA J. Death Dying 2023, 86, 809–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ning, X.; Wong, J.P.; Huang, S.; Fu, Y.; Gong, X.; Zhang, L.; Hilario, C.; Fung, K.P.-L.; Yu, M.; Poon, M.K.-L. Chinese university students’ perspectives on help-seeking and mental health counseling. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 8259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pachkowski, M.C.; Hewitt, P.L.; Klonsky, E.D. Examining suicidal desire through the lens of the three-step theory: A cross-sectional and longitudinal investigation in a community sample. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 2021, 89, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pompili, M.; Murri, M.B.; Patti, S.; Innamorati, M.; Lester, D.; Girardi, P.; Amore, M. The communication of suicidal intentions: A meta-analysis. Psychol. Med. 2016, 46, 2239–2253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schuler, K.R.; LaCroix, J.M.; Perera, K.U.; Baer, M.M.; Trieu, T.H.; Nademin, E.; Englert, D.; Jobes, D.; Ghahramanlou-Holloway, M. Interpersonal precipitants are associated with suicide intent communication among United States Air Force suicide decedents. J. Affect. Disord. Rep. 2021, 5, 100176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).