Next Article in Journal
“Going Forward Like a Grandmother in the Snow”: Personal Survival Strategies, Motherhood, and Nature as Resources for Mothers Who Have Experienced Intimate Partner Violence
Previous Article in Journal
Healthcare Impacts Associated with Federally Declared Disasters—Hurricanes Gustave and Ike
Previous Article in Special Issue
Risk Factors for Mortality in Emergently Admitted Patients with Acute Gastric Ulcer: An Analysis of 15,538 Patients in National Inpatient Sample, 2005–2014
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Elderly Patients Managed Non-Operatively with Abscesses of the Anorectal Region Have Five Times Higher Rate of Mortality Compared to Non-Elderly

1
School of Medicine, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA
2
Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA
3
Department of Surgery, College of Medicine-Tucson, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(7), 5387; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20075387
Submission received: 2 January 2023 / Revised: 27 February 2023 / Accepted: 17 March 2023 / Published: 4 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hospital Length of Stay and Health Outcomes)

Abstract

:
This study’s purpose was to investigate risk factors for mortality from anorectal abscesses through a more comprehensive examination. This was a retrospective study that evaluated National Inpatient Sample patient data of adult and elderly patients emergently admitted with a primary diagnosis of anorectal abscess. Data was stratified by variables of interest and examined through statistical analysis, including backward logistic regression modelling. Roughly 40,000 adult patients and nearly 7000 elderly patients were admitted emergently with a primary diagnosis of abscess in anorectal regions. The mean age of adult male patients was 43 years while elderly male patients were, on average, 73 years old. Both adult males (69.0%) and elderly males (63.9%) were more frequently seen in the hospital for anorectal abscess compared to females. Mortality rates were lower in adult patients as only 0.2% (n = 62) of adult patients and 1.0% (n = 73) of elderly patients died in the hospital. Age increased the odds of mortality (OR = 1.03; 95% CI: 1.02–1.04, p < 0.001) as did hospital length of stay (OR = 1.02; 95% CI: 1.01–1.03, p < 0.001). Surgical procedure decreased the odds of mortality by more than 50% (OR = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.33–0.71, p < 0.001). Risk factors for mortality from anorectal abscess included age and non-operative management, which leads to prolonged hospital length of stay. Surgical management of anorectal abscesses offered protective benefits.

1. Introduction

Abscesses of the perirectal region are common causes for surgical consultation that often require invasive procedures [1]. Anorectal abscesses are known to be infections of the anal gland which spread into proximal locales and may often result in fistulas. These fistulas can be problematic and result in incontinence or even cancer if long-lasting [2]. Additionally, although rare, anorectal abscesses that do not resolve with medications and other conservative treatments can sometimes in actuality be lymphomas [3]. The estimated incidence of anorectal abscess is roughly 16 to 20 for every 100,000 patients [4,5]. In the US, the incidence of anorectal abscess is estimated at roughly 68,000 to 96,000 patients per year [6,7]. In the UK, there are roughly 14,000 to 20,000 cases and 12,500 surgeries related to anorectal abscesses each year [8]. Fistulas are frequent following anorectal abscess treatment, with an incidence between 26–37% [2].
The etiology of anorectal abscesses consists of an infection of the anal gland. When the infection is between the internal sphincter and external sphincter, it is considered perianal; an infection located solely in the external sphincter is considered ischiorectal; an infection coming anteriorly through the rectal wall is an intermuscular abscess; an infection coming above through the levators is a supralevator abscess; and an infection located in the ischiorectal fossae is known as a horseshoe abscess [2]. Common risk factors for anorectal abscesses include male sex, smoking, diabetes, HIV, or other immunosuppressive circumstances that impede wound healing [9]. Interestingly, lower socioeconomic status was found to be associated with fistula formation after incision and drainage for the abscess [10]. Being able to properly diagnose and then subsequently classify the anorectal abscess is quite important, as finding the internal orifice of anorectal abscesses significantly decreases rates of recurrence of both fistulas and abscesses [11]. A correct early surgical treatment protocol and proper wound-care monitoring for abscesses after surgery is imperative not only for preventing recurrence, but also for preventing mortality. If the abscess is not diagnosed and corrected in a timely manner, the abscess can potentially lead to perianal sepsis or necrotizing soft tissue infection (NSTI) of the perineum and multiple organ system failure, requiring major operation and diversion of the fecal stream [9]. Early and aggressive surgical treatment of NSTI has been proven to be the most important factor in prognosis of these infections [12,13], which may have mortality rates approaching 50% [9]. Thus, clearly, a significant risk factor of mortality from anal abscess is delayed or improper treatment of the abscess. The other known major risk factors for mortality include an immunocompromised status, Crohn’s Disease, and advanced rectal cancer [9].
Recurrence rates and mortality rates increase significantly with delayed treatment even in a healthy population; this makes swift diagnosis, proper treatment, and careful monitoring imperative to help decrease the risks from anorectal abscess. The purpose of this study was to analyze patients who were admitted emergently to the hospital with a primary diagnosis of perirectal abscess. This was done on a large scale and over a 10-year period, with the goal to observe those patients’ characteristics and also their relationship to mortality. This paper’s research is especially important because, while there is copious research on risk factors leading to recurrence of anorectal abscess and fistula, there is a dearth of research exploring various risk factors for mortality in patients with anorectal abscesses.

2. Materials and Methods

This research made use of the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) databases. The database was created by AHRQ (the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality), which has been frequently used nationally as a public data source for analysis of variegated types and qualities of patient care and their associated results. This has allowed us to perform a comprehensive and holistic path to research diseases, a path to the ideal way to treat and care for patients with those diseases, and ultimately a path to find how patients respond to both the diseases and treatments [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. The NIS database includes certain weighting when constructing its sample of discharges and it excludes long-term acute care facilities and rehabilitation centers. These particular categorizations allowed the NIS database to parse out predictors of nation-wide hospitalizations. This paper consists of retrospective research encompassing patients with a primary diagnosis of an abscess in the anal or rectal region (ICD-9 code 566). These patients were emergently admitted from 2004 to 2014 (2005–2014 in the regression), and were part of the National Inpatient Sample database. The data were organized and subsequently examined in terms of age, with adults classified as ages 18–64 and elderly patients classified as ages 65 and older. The data was then further stratified into sex categories, patient mortality, and operation status (operation or no operation). The variables of interest were age, race (White, Black, Hispanic, Asian/Pacific Islander, or other), income quartile, insurance type (private, Medicare, Medicaid, self-pay, no-charge, or other), hospital location (rural, urban teaching, or urban non-teaching), comorbidity (AIDS, alcohol abuse, deficiency anemias, rheumatoid arthritis, chronic blood loss, CHF, chronic pulmonary disease, coagulopathy, depression, uncomplicated diabetes, chronic diabetes, drug abuse, hypertension, hypothyroidism, liver disease, lymphoma, fluid or electrolyte disorders, metastatic cancer, other neurological disorders, obesity, paralysis, peripheral vascular disorders, psychoses, pulmonary circulation disorders, renal failure, solid tumor, peptic ulcer, valvular disease, or weight loss), invasive diagnostic procedures, surgical procedures, medical or surgical complications, reoperation, deceased status, time to invasive diagnostic procedure, time to surgical procedure, hospital length of stay, and total charges in American dollars.
The modified frailty index in our study was scored from 0 to 5, with 5 being the frailest, and 0, not being frail. This modified frailty index included 5 variables: congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and a patient’s functional status. The index was then calculated via summation of one point of the following disease histories. A history of diabetes was included in the index if patients had either diabetes with chronic complications or uncomplicated diabetes. Congestive heart failure was marked to be included in the index for a patient if that patient had this comorbidity. Patient history of hypertension was included if hypertension was a comorbidity for the respective patient. Patients were marked for having a history of COPD if chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was noted for that respective patient. The NIS data did not explicitly include ‘functional health status’, so it was extrapolated from other comorbidities in the data set; patients with tumors, metastatic cancer, kidney failure, coagulopathy, lymphoma, paralysis, or weight loss were assumed to have some level of dependence and were thus marked as functionally dependent.

Statistical Analysis

The data were organized into tables (Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3) in which the correlated number and percentage or mean and standard deviation were presented. These tables were then analyzed using the chi-squared test for categorical variables and a t-test for continuous variables. Risk factors for mortality were analyzed through backward elimination multivariable logistic regression analysis (Table 4). The risk factors were analyzed and presented as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals, and p values below 0.05 were considered significant. Characteristics considered for adjustment in the model were age, surgical procedure, hospital length of stay in days, invasive procedure, respiratory diseases, cardiac diseases, liver diseases, genitourinary system diseases, platelet and white blood cell diseases, trauma, burns and poisons, neoplasms, and neurological diseases. Table 5 was analyzed in the same manner as Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3. We used SPSS version 24 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and R software (Foundation of Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

3. Results

3.1. Gender Differences

A total of 40,046 adult patients (age 18–64) were admitted emergently with a primary diagnosis of abscess in anal or rectal regions from 2004 to 2014. Of these, 27,646 (69.0%) were male while 12,400 (31.0%) were female, with a mean (SD) age of 43.05 (11.69) and 41.47 (12.28), respectively. On the other hand, there were 6982 elderly patients (age 65+) of which 4463 (63.9%) were male while 2519 (36.1%) were female, with a mean (SD) age of 73.42 (6.96) and 76.08 (8.11), respectively. For adults, most patients were White, funded by private insurance, and admitted to urban teaching hospitals. For elderly patients, most were White and largely funded by Medicare (Table 1).
Major comorbidities for adults included hypertension, uncomplicated diabetes, obesity, and fluid/electrolyte disorders. Adult males manifested higher rates of alcohol abuse, AIDS, drug abuse, liver disease, and paralysis, while adult females had higher rates of deficiency anemias due to chronic blood loss, rheumatoid arthritis, chronic pulmonary disease, depression, diabetes, hypothyroidism, fluid or electrolyte disorders, neurological disorders, obesity, and psychoses. Major comorbidities for elderly patients included hypertension, uncomplicated diabetes, fluid or electrolyte disorders, and deficiency anemias. Elderly males presented with higher rates of alcohol abuse, coagulopathy, lymphoma, metastatic cancer, and peripheral vascular disorders, while elderly females manifested higher rates of deficiency anemias, rheumatoid arthritis, depression, hypertension, hypothyroidism, fluid or electrolyte disorders, obesity, psychoses, and weight loss.
Adult females had longer hospital length of stay (HLOS), longer time to invasive diagnostic procedures, and longer time to surgical procedures than adult males. Adult females also were charged more money than adult males. Elderly females also had a longer HLOS than elderly males, but there was no significant difference between genders in terms of time to procedures and hospital charges. Elderly male patients had higher rates of surgical and invasive procedures than elderly female patients, but there was no significant gender difference in adult patients (Table 1).

3.2. Operative vs. Non-Operative Treatment

There were 34,137 (84.7%) adult patients admitted who underwent an operation in comparison to 6169 (15.3%) admitted adult patients who did not have an operation. A total of 5370 (76.9%) of the elderly patients underwent surgical procedure in comparison to 1616 (23.1%) elderly patients who did not have an operation (Table 2). For adults, the mean age of the group of patients who had an operation was 1.19 years younger than the group of patients who had no operation. For elderly patients, the mean age of the group of patients who had an operation was 1.40 years younger than the group of patients who had no operation (Table 2). For adults, in both the operative and non-operative groups, most patients were male, White, in income quartile 1, funded by private insurance, and admitted to urban teaching hospitals. For the elderly, in both the operative and non-operative groups, most patients were male, White, in income quartile 1, funded by Medicare, and admitted to urban non-teaching hospitals. In both adults and elderly patients, the mortality rate of operated patients was significantly lower than those managed non-operatively. For adults, those who had an operation had lower rates of incidence for most comorbidities. For elderly patients, there were fewer significant differences in comorbidity frequencies between those operated and not operated on; when there were significant differences, those who had an operation also had lower incidences of comorbidities, except for hypertension. Additionally, both adult and elderly patients who were operated on had higher rates of invasive diagnostic procedures, shorter hospital length of stay, and shorter time to invasive diagnostic procedure compared to those who did not have an operation. There was no significant difference in costs for adult patients regardless of whether they underwent operation, but among elderly patients, those who had an operation had higher total charges from hospitals than those who did not have an operation (Table 2).

3.3. Mortality and Age

Only 0.2% (n = 62) of adult patients died in the hospital, while 1.0% (n = 73) of elderly patients died in the hospital. Thus, the mortality rate in elderly patients was roughly five times the rate in nonelderly patients. While adult patients who survived as well as those who did not survive predominantly had private insurance, deceased patients were more likely to have used Medicare and Medicaid, while patients who survived were more likely to have used private insurance or self-pay (Table 3). Additionally, adult deceased patients had a larger percentage that were at urban teaching hospitals compared to those who survived. There was no significant difference between elderly patients who survived or died in terms of insurance or hospital location (Table 3). The deceased adults were roughly 9 years older than the adults that survived, while the deceased elderly patients were roughly 5 years older than the elderly patients who survived. The deceased elderly patients had a significantly longer time to invasive diagnostic and surgical procedure than those who survived; deceased adults had a significantly longer time to surgical procedure, but no significant difference in time to invasive diagnostic procedure compared to those adults who survived. Both deceased elderly and deceased adult patients had a longer hospital length of stay than their counterparts who survived: the elderly who died stayed over 6 days longer (on average) than those who survived, and adult patients who died stayed over 11 days longer (on average) than those who survived (Table 3). Similarly, total hospital charges were larger for both adult and elderly deceased patients than patients who survived.
There were also differences in terms of comorbidities exhibited by deceased patients and those who survived. For adults, those who died in the hospital were more likely to exhibit alcohol abuse, deficiency anemias, congestive heart failure, coagulopathy, hypertension, liver disease, lymphoma, fluid/electrolyte disorders, metastatic cancers, neurological disorders, peripheral vascular disorders, renal failure, and weight loss. For elderly patients who died in the hospital, they were more likely to present with congestive heart failure, chronic pulmonary disease, coagulopathy, fluid or electrolyte disorders, metastatic cancer, neurological disorders, peripheral vascular disorders, pulmonary circulation disorders, renal failure, and weight loss. This is similar to the study by Latifi et al. that demonstrated that presence of comorbid conditions such as alcohol abuse, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes, obesity, and hypothyroidism were associated with increased mortality in patients with NSTI, which is often associated with death in anorectal abscess patients [13].
Both elderly and adult deceased patients also exhibited higher rates of reoperation, medical or surgical complication diagnosis, and invasive diagnostic procedures; both elderly and adult patients who survived exhibited higher rates of surgical or invasive procedures. Elderly patients who survived had higher rates of uncomplicated diabetes (Table 3).

3.4. Risk Factors of Mortality

The backward logistic regression model, with mortality as the dependent variable, was created to assess associations of mortality and different risk factors for patients. Variables used to adjust the model included age, surgical procedure, invasive procedure, respiratory disease, cardiac disease, liver disease, genitourinary disease, platelet and white blood cell disease, trauma, burns and poisons, neoplasms, and neurological disease (Table 4). Management of patients through operation decreased the odds of mortality by 51%. Each additional year aged (in our patient sample of adults and elderly) increased the odds of mortality by 3%. Each additional day of hospital stay increased the odds of mortality by 2%. Having a surgery was a protective factor, however, as non-operative management doubled the odds of mortality. As we can see, trauma, burns, and poisons increased the odds of mortality more than 7-fold. Respiratory disease increased the odds of mortality more than 4-fold, and both cardiac and liver diseases increased the chances of mortality by greater than 3 times. Genitourinary system diseases increased the odds of mortality by 3 times. Platelet and white blood cell diseases more than doubled the odds of mortality. Neoplasms and neurological diseases increased the mortality odds by 93% and 70%, respectively (Table 4).

3.5. The Role of Lifestyle, Complications, Comorbidities and Secondary Diagnoses in Mortality

When comparing the lifestyle, complications, comorbidities, and secondary diagnoses of adult patients who were admitted emergently with a primary diagnosis of abscess of anal and rectal regions, differences were noted between those who survived and those who did not. Both deceased elderly and deceased adult patients had higher rates of bacterial infections other than tuberculosis, nonbacterial infections, anemia and, or hemorrhage, respiratory diseases, cardiac diseases, genitourinary system diseases, neurological diseases, fluid and electrolyte disorders, platelet and white blood cell diseases, and skin diseases, as well as trauma, burns, and poisoning. The deceased adults alone had higher rates of hypertension, peripheral vascular diseases, coagulopathy, cerebrovascular disease, liver diseases, endocrine diseases, and neoplasms, as well as alcohol abuse, withdrawal, or dependence (Table 5). Deceased elderly patients alone had higher rates of diabetes and tobacco use. Elderly patients who survived had higher rates of abnormal BMI (underweight, overweight, or obese) compared to those who died (Table 5).

4. Discussion

This study’s results demonstrate the differences in mortality rates between adult and elderly patients, along with the main risk factors for mortality in patients admitted emergently with a primary diagnosis of abscess in the anal and rectal regions.

4.1. Age as a Risk Factor

Age was seen to be a major risk factor as the mortality rate in elderly patients was more than five times that of adult patients. The association of increasing age with increasing death rates can possibly be attributed to intrinsic factors of aging and more specific anorectal abscess-related factors. In terms of aging, Rosenthal et al. found that the general odds of death in-hospital for all patients increases with each 5-year increase in age [26]. From the age groups of 40–44 to 80–84, the odds of mortality, independent of illness severity, increased from 1.51 to 3.86, respectively [26]. Additionally, between these two age groups, Rosenthal et al. found an increase of mortality in every 5 years of age [26]. Thus, from a broader scope, age is a risk factor for mortality in cases of anorectal abscess diagnosis.
A more specific potential cause of aging in mortality could possibly be due to advances of the disease process from an abscess to NSTI with perineum and retroperitoneal involvement. Increased age enhances the likelihood of these more deleterious types of abscesses in anal or rectal regions, which elevates the chance of mortality in patients [27,28,29]. These abscesses are relatively rarer compared to intraperitoneal abscesses and tend to have a delayed course of action, which leads to delayed diagnoses and improper drainage [9,29]. As aforementioned, delay in diagnosis and timely and complete drainage of abscesses increases risks related to necrotizing tissue [9,12]. Delayed treatment increases mortality in patients with other primary diseases such as hemorrhoids, duodenal ulcers, and ventral hernias [14,15,16]. Even with proper treatment, research has shown these retroperitoneal abscesses can result in an 11–20% mortality rate [28]. These rarer anorectal abscesses are very often seen in males and in the 6th decade of life, which could connect to the relative increase in death rates of elderly patients in this study [28]. Thus, age is a significant risk factor for mortality in patients with anorectal abscesses.

4.2. Interplay between HLOS and Operation Status

The next central finding in our study was that operative treatment was a protective factor against mortality, while prolonged hospital length of stay was a risk factor for mortality. In this study, however, those having an operation had a significantly shorter HLOS. Others have reported similar findings. Hsieh et al. found that, in anorectal abscess patients on dialysis, those who had surgery had better in-hospital survival [30]. They also note the possibility that those who received the more conservative non-surgical treatment potentially had more significant comorbidities [30]. Similarly, Dos-Santos et al. found that a predominant cause of death from anorectal abscess (Fournier’s Gangrene) is often associated with comorbidities and results in longer hospital length of stay and greater mortality rates [31].
In our study, it also was observed that patients that had an operation had lower rates of comorbidities compared to those who did not undergo an operation. Therefore, the higher rates of comorbidities in the non-surgical group of patients may have meant they were poor candidates for surgery, and also may have caused them to require a prolonged HLOS and consequently, increased mortality. From a surgical standpoint, irrespective of comorbidities, patients with an abscess need to be operated on as soon as possible, usually in the first 2–3 h, in order to prevent development of NSTI. Having co-morbidities should not be a contraindication for surgical intervention, and in fact should increase the awareness [13]. The common dictum that we should resuscitate patients with NSTI before operating is inappropriate and has deleterious effects. These patients need to be resuscitated simultaneously with surgical intervention and blood and blood products aggressively, and thus the need for resuscitation should not delay surgery. Further, Ramanujam et al. state that more aggressive surgical procedures in abscess treatment reduces complications and the need for further surgery [32]. The reduction in complications and reduced need for further surgery is in line with the aforementioned notion that delayed or improper treatment of abscesses results in worsened outcomes. Lower complication rates may then partially explain both the lowered HLOS and mortality found in the operated group.
Longer hospital length of stay has been shown to be detrimental in many diverse conditions [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,30,33,34]. Interestingly, for patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, longer hospital length of stay was inversely correlated with mortality and thus improved outcomes [35]. In elderly patients with colon cancer that were emergently admitted, there was a non-linear, U-shaped association with HLOS and mortality [36]. Similarly, in patients admitted emergently for C. Difficile colitis, hospital length of stay had a J-shaped association with mortality in non-elderly patients and a V-shaped association in elderly patients [37]. In elderly patients with an emergent admission for phlebitis and thrombophlebitis, the association between mortality and HLOS was V-shaped [38]. In patients with acute pancreatitis, HLOS and mortality had a V-shaped association [39].

4.2.1. Other Risk Factors

The other main risk factors of mortality included various pre-existing diseases (specifically respiratory, cardiac, liver, genitourinary, platelet and white blood cell, as well as trauma, burns and poisons, neoplasms, and neurological diseases). Anorectal abscesses can also result in fistulas that lead to NSTI, significantly increasing odds of death [40]. Diabetes is a common comorbidity resulting in mortality by contributing to the development of NSTI [41]. Developing necrotic tissue is often associated with comorbidities that negatively impact one’s immune system, with alcoholism, HIV, and leukemia being the most common contributors [42]; necrotizing perineal infection is uncommon but associated with high mortality in those who are immunocompromised or have diabetes [43]. There is limited research on risk factors associated with perirectal abscess mortality, as most studies on mortality are limited to case studies or studies with low sample sizes. Despite limited research on risk factors for mortality, there is a multitude of research in terms of risk factors for recurrence of perirectal abscess. Akkapulu et al. demonstrate no association between recurrence of abscess and sex, age, and hospital length of stay [44]. Additionally, diabetes and obesity were connected to a significant increase in patients developing anorectal abscesses, but they were not significant in readmission to the hospital for anorectal abscess [4]. Sigmon et al. also mention that common risk factors include smoking and diabetes, along with immunosuppressive drugs and HIV [9].
Because of the aforementioned lack of research into risk factors for mortality from anorectal abscess, this paper is important in its role in addressing some gaps in our understanding. Future research should hopefully explore other pertinent risk factors and attempt to determine the exact mechanism of death by each significant risk factor.

4.2.2. Gender and Abscess Likelihood

Our study showed that there were gender differences in admission to the hospital for patients with a primary diagnosis of peri-anal abscess. For both adult and elderly patients, men were more commonly admitted for peri-anal abscess, which has also been copiously supported by the literature. According to Read et al., males are 1.76 times more likely to have a peri-anal abscess than females [45], while Sigmon et al. reported that males are roughly twice as likely to develop these abscesses as females [9]. Additionally, Sahnan et al. also show a roughly 2:1 male-to-female ratio in abscess frequency [8]. This may be explained by the fact that there are significantly more anal glands in males than females [46].

4.2.3. Differences in Total Hospital Charges

Both adult and elderly females had longer hospital length of stay than males of their respective age. Interestingly, however, adult females had higher charges compared to adult males while elderly females had no significant difference in charges when compared to elderly males. Owens states that, when analyzing healthcare cost disparities of men and women in different segmental ages (0–18, 18–44, 45–64, and >64), adult females and males aged 45–64 have the largest gap, while those older than 64 have the lowest gap. He attributes this difference to health burdens (osteoporosis, CVD, breast cancer, etc.) due to menopause-associated conditions [47]. Assaf et al. also note that there is a burden of increased healthcare costs related to managing menopausal symptoms, particularly in females aged 45–64 [48]. Thus, complications associated with menopause may have resulted in greater hospital charges in adult women.

4.2.4. Strength of the Study

This study’s strength lies in its patient sample. The patient population is substantial in number and includes a wide array of different hospital types and geographic locations. These aspects of the sample allow generalizability to many different clinical settings across the nation, while also allowing this study to analyze how different hospital characteristics, patient demographics, and patient idiosyncrasies interplay in anorectal abscesses. These strengths allow for future investigations.

4.2.5. Limitations of the Study

This study lacks specifications of abscess location, size, severity, procedure approach, and experience of the provider. Additionally, this study is retrospective: this naturally limits our ability for a cause-and-effect analysis and makes the study prone to bias. Further research on cause of death due to anorectal abscess and case complexity are necessary, especially due to the limited research on anorectal-abscess-associated mortality. An additional limitation is that the NIS database uses ICD codes, which may provide inaccurate disease classifications and restrict potential conclusions. Thus, this paper’s ‘Other risk factors’ section must be qualified in that our ability to interpret interplay with comorbidities may be limited.

5. Conclusions

The odds of mortality from anorectal abscesses increased in emergently admitted patients who had non-operative management, preexisting disease, older age, and extended hospital stays.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.S. and R.L.; methodology, A.S. and R.L.; software, A.S.; validation, A.S. and R.L.; formal analysis, A.S.; investigation, A.L.; resources, R.L.; data curation, A.S.; writing—original draft preparation, A.L.; writing—review and editing, A.S. and R.L.; visualization, A.S. and A.L.; supervision, A.S. and R.L.; project administration, R.L.; funding acquisition, Not Applicable. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of New York Medical College (protocol code 14177, approved in June 2019).

Data Availability Statement

Data will be available upon request.

Acknowledgments

We thank Jonathan Butler for his help in statistical analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors of this paper declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fielding, M.A.; Berry, A.R. Management of Perianal Sepsis in a District General Hospital. J. R. Coll. Surg. Edinb. 1992, 37, 232–234. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Abcarian, H. Anorectal Infection: Abscess-Fistula. Clin. Colon Rectal Surg. 2011, 24, 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Jayasekera, H.; Gorissen, K.; Francis, L.; Chow, C. Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma Presenting as a Peri-Anal Abscess. J. Surg. Case Rep. 2014, 2014, rju035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Adamo, K.; Sandblom, G.; Brännström, F.; Strigård, K. Prevalence and Recurrence Rate of Perianal Abscess—A Population-Based Study, Sweden 1997–2009. Int. J. Color. Dis. 2016, 31, 669–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Sahnan, K.; Askari, A.; Adegbola, S.O.; Tozer, P.J.; Phillips, R.K.S.; Hart, A.; Faiz, O.D. Natural History of Anorectal Sepsis. Br. J. Surg. 2017, 104, 1857–1865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Vasilevsky, C.-A.; Gordon, P.H. The Incidence of Recurrent Abscesses or Fistula-in-Ano Following Anorectal Suppuration. Dis. Colon Rectum 1984, 27, 126–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Scoma, J.A.; Salvati, E.P.; Rubin, R.J. Incidence of Fistulas Subsequent to Anal Abscesses. Dis. Colon Rectum 1974, 17, 357–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sahnan, K.; Adegbola, S.O.; Tozer, P.J.; Watfah, J.; Phillips, R.K. Perianal Abscess. BMJ 2017, 356, j475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sigmon, D.F.; Emmanuel, B.; Tuma, F. Perianal Abscess. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: St. Petersburg, FL, USA, 2022. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459167/ (accessed on 4 April 2022).
  10. Hasan, Z.A.I.Y.; Mohamed, B.; AlSayegh, R.; AlMarzooq, R. Incidence of Anal Fistula After Pyogenic Perianal Abscess Drainage in Kingdom of Bahrain. J. Korean Soc. Coloproctol. 2021, 39, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Paydar, S.; Izadpanah, A.; Ghahramani, L.; Hosseini, S.V.; Bananzadeh, A.; Rahimikazerooni, S.; Bahrami, F. How the Anal Gland Orifice Could Be Found in Anal Abscess Operations. J. Res. Med. Sci. Off. J. Isfahan Univ. Med. Sci. 2015, 20, 22–25. [Google Scholar]
  12. Hadeed, G.J.; Smith, J.; O’Keeffe, T.; Kulvatunyou, N.; Wynne, J.L.; Joseph, B.; Friese, R.S.; Wachtel, T.L.; Rhee, P.M.; El-Menyar, A.; et al. Early surgical intervention and its impact on patients presenting with necrotizing soft tissue infections: A single academic center experience. J. Emerg. Trauma Shock 2016, 9, 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Latifi, R.; Patel, A.S.; Samson, D.J.; Tilley, E.H.; Gashi, S.; Bergamaschi, R.; El-Menyar, A. The roles of early surgery and comorbid conditions on outcomes of severe necrotizing soft-tissue infections. Eur. J. Trauma Emerg. Surg. 2018, 45, 919–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Latifi, R.; Levy, L.; Reddy, M.; Okumura, K.; Smiley, A. Delayed Operation as a Major Risk Factor for Mortality Among Elderly Patients with Ventral Hernia Admitted Emergently: An Analysis of 33,700 Elderly Patients. Surg. Technol. Int. 2021, 39, sti39/1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Levy, L.; Smiley, A.; Latifi, R. Independent Predictors of In-Hospital Mortality in Elderly and Non-Elderly Adult Patients Undergoing Emergency Admission for Hemorrhoids in the USA: A 10-Year National Dataset. Am. Surg. 2022, 88, 936–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lin, N.; Smiley, A.; Goud, M.; Lin, C.; Latifi, R. Risk Factors of Mortality in Patients Hospitalized with Chronic Duodenal Ulcers. Am. Surg. 2022, 88, 764–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Smiley, A.; Levy, L.; Latifi, R. Risk Factors for Mortality in Patients with Ventral Hernia Admitted Emergently: An Analysis of 48,539 Adult Patients. Surg. Technol. Int. 2021, 39, sti39/1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Levy, L.; Smiley, A.; Latifi, R. Mortality in Emergently Admitted Patients with Empyema: An Analysis of 18,033 Patients. Kos. Surg. J. 2021, 6, 109–130. [Google Scholar]
  19. Levy, L.; Smiley, A.; Latifi, R. Independent Predictors of In-Hospital Mortality in Patients Undergoing Emergency Admission for Arterial embolism and Thrombosis in the USA: A 10-Year National Dataset. Kos. Surg. J. 2021, 6, 97–108. [Google Scholar]
  20. Elgar, G.; Smiley, P.; Smiley, A.; Feingold, C.; Latifi, R. Age Increases the Risk of Mortality by Four-Fold in Patients with Emergent Paralytic Ileus: Hospital Length of Stay, Sex, Frailty, and Time to Operation as Other Risk Factors. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 9905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Elgar, G.; Smiley, A.; Latifi, R. Major Risk Factors for Mortality in Elderly and Non-Elderly Adult Patients Emergently Admitted for Blunt Chest Wall Trauma: Hospital Length of Stay as an Independent Predictor. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 8729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Levy, L.; Smiley, A.; Latifi, R. Adult and Elderly Risk Factors of Mortality in 23,614 Emergently Admitted Patients with Rectal or Rectosigmoid Junction Malignancy. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 9203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Levy, L.; Smiley, A.; Latifi, R. Mortality Risk Factors in Patients Admitted with the Primary Diagnosis of Tracheostomy Complications: An Analysis of 8026 Patients. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 9031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hirani, R.; Smiley, A.; Latifi, L.; Latifi, R. The Risk of Mortality in Geriatric Patients with Emergent Gastroparesis Is 7-Fold Greater than That in Adult Patients: An Analysis of 27,000 Patients. Surg. Technol. Int. 2022, 40, 85–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Patel, S.; Smiley, A.; Feingold, C.; Khandehroo, B.; Kajmolli, A.; Latifi, R. Chances of Mortality Are 3.5-Times Greater in Elderly Patients with Umbilical Hernia Than in Adult Patients: An Analysis of 21,242 Patients. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 10402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Rosenthal, G.E.; Kaboli, P.J.; Barnett, M.J.; Sirio, C.A. Age and the Risk of In-Hospital Death: Insights from a Multihospital Study of Intensive Care Patients. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2002, 50, 1205–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yildirim, G.; Karakas, H. Percutaneous Catheter Drainage in Retroperitoneal Abscesses: A Single Centre’s 8-Year Experience. Pol. J. Radiol. 2022, 87, 238–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pehlivanli, F.; Aydin, O.; Karaca, G.; Aydin, G.; Daphan, E. An Extremely Rare Complication of Widespread Retroperitoneal Abscess Originating from Anorectal Horseshoe Abscess. Bull. Emerg. Trauma 2019, 7, 72–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Akhan, O.; Durmaz, H.; Balci, S.; Birgi, E.; Ciftci, T.; Akinci, D. Percutaneous Drainage of Retroperitoneal Abscesses: Variables for Success, Failure, and Recurrence. Diagn. Interv. Radiol. 2020, 26, 124–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Hsieh, M.-H.; Lu, Y.-A.; Kuo, G.; Chen, C.-Y.; Sun, W.-C.; Lin, Y.; Tian, Y.-C.; Hsu, H.-H. Epidemiology and Outcomes of Anal Abscess in Patients on Chronic Dialysis: A 14-Year Retrospective Study. Clinics 2019, 74, e638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dos-Santos, D.R.; Roman, U.L.T.; Westphalen, A.P.; Lovison, K.; Neto, F.A.C.S. Profile of Patients with Fournier’s Gangrene and Their Clinical Evolution. Rev. Col. Bras. Cir. 2018, 45, e1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ramanujam, P.S.; Prasad, L.M.; Abcarian, H.; Tan, A.B. Perianal Abscesses and Fistulas. A Study of 1023 Patients. Dis. Colon Rectum 1984, 27, 593–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Frisch, A.; Chandra, P.; Smiley, D.; Peng, L.; Rizzo, M.; Gatcliffe, C.; Hudson, M.; Mendoza, J.; Johnson, R.; Lin, E.; et al. Prevalence and Clinical Outcome of Hyperglycemia in the Perioperative Period in Noncardiac Sur-gery. Diabetes Care 2010, 33, 1783–1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Newbury, D.; Smiley, A.; Latifi, R. Predictors of In-Hospital Mortality in Nonelderly Patients Admitted with Bleeding Gastritis: A Retrospective Cohort of 8,874 Patients. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2021, 233, e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lobao, A.; Smiley, A.; Latifi, R. Longer Hospital Length of Stay and Emergency Surgical Intervention Are Associated with Lower Rates of Mortality In Elderly Patients with Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: An Analysis of 7,214 Patients. Surg. Technol. Int. 2022, 41, sti41/1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nath, H.; Smiley, A.; Latifi, R. Nonlinear Association of Hospital Length of Stay and In-Hospital Mortality of Elderly Patients Admit-ted Emergently for Colon Cancer: Analysis of 40,421 Patients. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2021, 233, e31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Beydoun, M.; Smiley, A.; Latifi, R. Predictors of In-Hospital Mortality of Patients Admitted Emergently for C. Difficile Colitis: A 10-Year Analysis of 174,074 Patients From NIS. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2021, 233, e26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gatzoflias, S.; Smiley, A.; Latifi, R. Risk Factors of Mortality in Emergency Admission of Phlebitis and Thrombophlebitis in El-derly Patients: A Retrospective Cohort of 8911 Patients. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2021, 233, e237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. McGuirk, M.; Smiley, A.; Latifi, R. The Predictors of In-Hospital Mortality in Non-Elderly Adult Patients Requiring Emergency Admission for Acute Pancreatitis: Analysis by Generalized Additive Model of 344,120 Patients. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2021, 233, e114–e115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mitra, A.; Yadav, A.; Mehta, N.; Varma, V.; Kumaran, V.; Nundy, S. Complicated Perianal Sepsis. Indian J. Surg. 2013, 77, 769–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Alsharari, M.; Pasquesoone, L.; Khater, R.; Guerreschi, P.; De Broucker, V.; Martinot-Duquennoy, V. Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections Following a Scald Burn of the Lower Limb: A Case Report. Ann. Burn. Fire Disasters 2013, 26, 158–161. [Google Scholar]
  42. Tarasconi, A.; Perrone, G.; Davies, J.; Coimbra, R.; Moore, E.; Azzaroli, F.; Abongwa, H.; De Simone, B.; Gallo, G.; Rossi, G.; et al. Anorectal Emergencies: WSES-AAST Guidelines. World J. Emerg. Surg. 2021, 16, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Moorthy, K.; Rao, P.P.; Supe, A. Necrotising Perineal Infection: A Fatal Outcome of Ischiorectal Fossa Abscesses. J. R. Coll. Surg. Edinb. 2000, 45, 281–284. [Google Scholar]
  44. Akkapulu, N.; Dere, O.; Zaim, G.; Soy, H.E.A.; Ozmen, T.; Dogrul, A.B. A Retrospective Analysis of 93 Cases with Anorectal Abscess in a Rural State Hospital. Turk. J. Surg. 2015, 31, 5–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Read, D.R.; Abcarian, H. A prospective survey of 474 patients with anorectal abscess. Dis. Colon Rectum 1979, 22, 566–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Lilius, H.G. Fistula-in-Ano, an Investigation of Human Foetal Anal Ducts and Intramuscular Glands and a Clinical Study of 150 Patients. Acta Chir. Scand. Suppl. 1968, 383, 7–88. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  47. Owens, G. Gender Differences in Health Care Expenditures, Resource Utilization, and Quality of Care. J. Manag. Care Pharm. 2008, 14, 2–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Assaf, A.R.; Bushmakin, A.G.; Joyce, N.; Louie, M.J.; Flores, M.; Moffatt, M. The Relative Burden of Menopausal and Postmenopausal Symptoms versus Other Major Conditions: A Retrospective Analysis of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Data. Am. Health Drug Benefits 2017, 10, 311–321. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Table 1. Characteristics of emergently admitted patients with the primary diagnosis of abscess of anal/rectal regions. Data are stratified according to sex categories, NIS 2004–2014.
Table 1. Characteristics of emergently admitted patients with the primary diagnosis of abscess of anal/rectal regions. Data are stratified according to sex categories, NIS 2004–2014.
Adult, N (%)Elderly, N (%)
MaleFemalepMaleFemalep
All Cases27,646 (69.0%)12,400 (31.0%)4463 (63.9%)2519 (36.1%)
RaceWhite12,232 (51.4%)5964 (56.4%)<0.0012680 (69.9%)1593 (75.3%)<0.001
Black5340 (22.5%)2694 (25.5%)492 (12.8%)286 (13.5%)
Hispanic4357 (18.3%)1321 (12.5%)429 (11.2%)159 (7.5%)
Asian/Pacific Islander644 (2.7%)205 (1.9%)93 (2.4%)33 (1.6%)
Native American191 (0.8%)81 (0.8%)21 (0.5%)11 (0.5%)
Other1012 (4.3%)311 (2.9%)120 (3.1%)34 (1.6%)
Income
Quartile
Quartile 18906 (33.3%)4168 (34.5%)<0.0011306 (29.9%)729 (29.6%)<0.001
Quartile 26796 (25.4%)3116 (25.8%)1124 (25.7%)680 (27.6%)
Quartile 36135 (22.9%)2657 (22%)1057 (24.2%)575 (23.3%)
Quartile 44943 (18.5%)2123 (17.6%)881 (20.2%)481 (19.5%)
InsurancePrivate Insurance12,619 (45.8%)5563 (45%)0.011520 (11.7%)196 (7.8%)0.670
Medicare2834 (10.3%)1298 (10.5%)3776 (84.7%)2254 (89.6%)
Medicaid4188 (15.2%)2871 (23.2%)66 (1.5%)35 (1.4%)
Self-Pay5707 (20.7%)1915 (15.5%)37 (0.8%)9 (0.4%)
No Charge586 (2.1%)179 (1.4%)1 (0%)4 (0.2%)
Other1626 (5.9%)548 (4.4%)57 (1.3%)17 (0.7%)
Hospital
Location
Rural2815 (10.2%)1417 (11.5%)<0.001624 (14%)360 (14.3%)0.400
Urban: Non-Teaching11,403 (41.4%)5062 (41.0%)2007 (45.1%)1156 (45.9%)
Urban: Teaching13,299 (48.3%)5867 (47.5%)1817 (40.8%)1000 (39.7%)
ComorbiditiesAIDS607 (2.2%)106 (0.9%)<0.0016 (0.1%)0 (0%)
Alcohol Abuse1104 (4%)159 (1.3%)<0.001135 (3%)11 (0.4%)<0.001
Deficiency Anemias1919 (6.9%)1551 (12.5%)<0.001795 (17.8%)617 (24.5%)<0.001
Rheumatoid Arthritis225 (0.8%)332 (2.7%)<0.00185 (1.9%)116 (4.6%)<0.001
Chronic Blood Loss88 (0.3%)93 (0.8%)<0.00158 (1.3%)28 (1.1%)0.490
Congestive Heart Failure496 (1.8%)236 (1.9%)0.450552 (12.4%)338 (13.4%)0.210
Chronic Pulmonary Disease2180 (7.9%)1628 (13.1%)<0.001876 (19.6%)452 (17.9%)0.090
Coagulopathy408 (1.5%)165 (1.3%)0.260172 (3.9%)63 (2.5%)0.003
Depression1202 (4.3%)1235 (10.0%)<0.001251 (5.6%)245 (9.7%)<0.001
Diabetes, Uncomplicated5666 (20.5%)3044 (24.5%)<0.0011442 (32.3%)835 (33.1%)0.470
Diabetes, Chronic Complications770 (2.8%)546 (4.4%)<0.001236 (5.3%)154 (6.1%)0.150
Drug Abuse1098 (4.0%)341 (2.8%)<0.00114 (0.3%)6 (0.2%)0.570
Hypertension8174 (29.6%)3660 (29.5%)0.9202913 (65.3%)1739 (69.0%)0.001
Hypothyroidism499 (1.8%)829 (6.7%)<0.001302 (6.8%)461 (18.3%)<0.001
Liver Disease655 (2.4%)203 (1.6%)<0.00188 (2%)40 (1.6%)0.250
Lymphoma146 (0.5%)45 (0.4%)0.02783 (1.9%)27 (1.1%)0.011
Fluid/Electrolyte Disorders3026 (10.9%)1907 (15.4%)<0.001949 (21.3%)744 (29.5%)<0.001
Metastatic Cancer346 (1.3%)160 (1.3%)0.750212 (4.8%)57 (2.3%)<0.001
Other Neurological Disorders586 (2.1%)343 (2.8%)<0.001307 (6.9%)201 (8%)0.090
Obesity2975 (10.8%)2345 (18.9%)<0.001368 (8.2%)310 (12.3%)<0.001
Paralysis325 (1.2%)93 (0.8%)<0.001106 (2.4%)48 (1.9%)0.200
Peripheral Vascular Disorders308 (1.1%)112 (0.9%)0.060344 (7.7%)132 (5.2%)<0.001
Psychoses706 (2.6%)488 (3.9%)<0.00159 (1.3%)55 (2.2%)0.006
Pulmonary Circulation Disorders72 (0.3%)42 (0.3%)0.17063 (1.4%)44 (1.7%)0.270
Renal Failure939 (3.4%)423 (3.4%)0.940629 (14.1%)332 (13.2%)0.290
Solid Tumor387 (1.4%)194 (1.6%)0.200202 (4.5%)112 (4.4%)0.880
Peptic Ulcer5 (0%)0 (0%)0.3300 (0%)0 (0%)<0.001
Valvular Disease230 (0.8%)136 (1.1%)0.010179 (4.0%)126 (5.0%)0.052
Weight Loss467 (1.7%)232 (1.9%)0.200232 (5.2%)162 (6.4%)0.032
Invasive Diagnostic Procedure3089 (11.2%)1315 (10.6%)0.090532 (11.9%)263 (10.4%)0.060
Surgical Procedure23,494 (85%)10,404 (83.9%)0.0063510 (78.6%)1856 (73.7%)<0.001
Invasive or Surgical Procedure23,810 (86.1%)10,585 (85.4%)0.0433594 (80.5%)1912 (75.9%)<0.001
Medical/Surgical Complication Diagnosis214 (0.8%)104 (0.8%)0.50049 (1.1%)28 (1.1%)0.960
Reoperation249 (0.9%)100 (0.8%)0.350100 (2.2%)59 (2.3%)0.790
Deceased45 (0.2%)17 (0.1%)0.55039 (0.9%)34 (1.4%)0.060
Mean (SD)Mean (SD)pMean (SD)Mean (SD)p
Age, Years43.05 (11.69)41.47 (12.28)<0.00173.42 (6.96)76.08 (8.11)<0.001
Modified Frailty Index Score0.72 (0.92)0.83 (0.99)<0.0011.66 (1.12)1.67 (1.10)0.580
Time to Invasive Diagnostic Procedure, Days1.18 (1.89)1.56 (3.33)<0.0012.35 (3.26)2.74 (3.65)0.160
Time to Surgical Procedure, Days0.62 (1.22)0.69 (1.35)<0.0011.12 (5.74)1.11 (1.77)0.960
Hospital Length of Stay, Days3.28 (4.01)3.64 (4.26)<0.0015.02 (6.69)5.85 (6.02)<0.001
Total Charges, American Dollars22,727
(32,984)
23,458
(32,992)
0.04330,999
(36,644)
31,605
(40,119)
0.530
Table 2. Characteristics of emergently admitted patients with the primary diagnosis of abscess of anal/rectal regions. Data are stratified according to operation status, NIS 2004–2014.
Table 2. Characteristics of emergently admitted patients with the primary diagnosis of abscess of anal/rectal regions. Data are stratified according to operation status, NIS 2004–2014.
Adult, N (%)Elderly, N (%)
No OperationOperationpNo OperationOperationp
All Cases6169 (15.3%)34,137 (84.7%)1616 (23.1%)5370 (76.9%)
Sex, Female1996 (32.5%)10,404 (30.7%)0.006663 (41.0%)1856 (34.6%)<0.001
RaceWhite2846 (54.3%)15,351 (52.7%)0.0021010 (73.8%)3263 (71.2%)0.002
Black1241 (23.7%)6793 (23.3%)184 (13.4%)594 (13.0%)
Hispanic791 (15.1%)4888 (16.8%)110 (8.0%)478 (10.4%)
Asian/Pacific Islander110 (2.1%)739 (2.5%)26 (1.9%)101 (2.2%)
Native American56 (1.1%)216 (0.7%)14 (1.0%)18 (0.4%)
Other202 (3.9%)1121 (3.9%)25 (1.8%)129 (2.8%)
Income
Quartile
Quartile 12124 (35.5%)10,996 (33.2%)<0.001477 (30.2%)1559 (29.7%)0.960
Quartile 21529 (25.6%)8425 (25.4%)415 (26.3%)1390 (26.4%)
Quartile 31301 (21.8%)7548 (22.8%)377 (23.9%)1255 (23.9%)
Quartile 41021 (17.1%)6153 (18.6%)309 (19.6%)1054 (20.0%)
InsurancePrivate Insurance2508 (40.8%)15,818 (46.5%)<0.001143 (8.9%)574 (10.7%)0.220
Medicare885 (14.4%)3254 (9.6%)1418 (87.9%)4615 (86.1%)
Medicaid1303 (21.2%)5793 (17.0%)26 (1.6%)75 (1.4%)
Self-Pay1064 (17.3%)6601 (19.4%)12 (0.7%)34 (0.6%)
No Charge93 (1.5%)672 (2.0%)0 (0%)5 (0.1%)
Other293 (4.8%)1910 (5.6%)15 (0.9%)59 (1.1%)
Hospital
Location
Rural722 (11.8%)3515 (10.3%)0.002262 (16.3%)722 (13.5%)0.012
Urban: Non-Teaching2546 (41.5%)14,046 (41.3%)698 (43.3%)2468 (46.1%)
Urban: Teaching2868 (46.7%)16,426 (48.3%)651 (40.4%)2167 (40.5%)
ComorbiditiesAIDS235 (3.8%)479 (1.4%)<0.0012 (0.1%)4 (0.1%)0.630
Alcohol Abuse239 (3.9%)1024 (3.0%)<0.00129 (1.8%)117 (2.2%)0.340
Deficiency Anemias810 (13.1%)2663 (7.8%)<0.001374 (23.1%)1039 (19.3%)<0.001
Rheumatoid Arthritis105 (1.7%)452 (1.3%)0.01947 (2.9%)154 (2.9%)0.930
Chronic Blood Loss41 (0.7%)140 (0.4%)0.00627 (1.7%)59 (1.1%)0.070
Congestive Heart Failure161 (2.6%)571 (1.7%)<0.001242 (15.0%)648 (12.1%)0.002
Chronic Pulmonary Disease669 (10.8%)3143 (9.2%)<0.001308 (19.1%)1020 (19.0%)0.950
Coagulopathy149 (2.4%)424 (1.2%)<0.00169 (4.3%)166 (3.1%)0.021
Depression497 (8.1%)1941 (5.7%)<0.001136 (8.4%)360 (6.7%)0.019
Diabetes, Uncomplicated1440 (23.3%)7279 (21.3%)<0.001503 (31.1%)1774 (33.0%)0.150
Diabetes, Chronic Complications271 (4.4%)1045 (3.1%)<0.001100 (6.2%)290 (5.4%)0.230
Drug Abuse310 (5.0%)1129 (3.3%)<0.0017 (0.4%)13 (0.2%)0.210
Hypertension2044 (33.1%)9802 (28.7%)<0.0011035 (64.0%)3617 (67.4%)0.013
Hypothyroidism234 (3.8%)1094 (3.2%)0.017174 (10.8%)590 (11.0%)0.800
Liver Disease168 (2.7%)691 (2.0%)<0.00136 (2.2%)92 (1.7%)0.180
Lymphoma48 (0.8%)144 (0.4%)<0.00132 (2%)78 (1.5%)0.140
Fluid/Electrolyte Disorders1049 (17.0%)3885 (11.4%)<0.001442 (27.4%)1252 (23.3%)<0.001
Metastatic Cancer163 (2.6%)343 (1.0%)<0.00179 (4.9%)190 (3.5%)0.013
Other Neurological Disorders167 (2.7%)762 (2.2%)0.022145 (9%)363 (6.8%)0.003
Obesity883 (14.3%)4443 (13.0%)0.006149 (9.2%)529 (9.9%)0.450
Paralysis126 (2.0%)292 (0.9%)<0.00141 (2.5%)113 (2.1%)0.300
Peripheral Vascular Disorders94 (1.5%)326 (1.0%)<0.001115 (7.1%)361 (6.7%)0.580
Psychoses254 (4.1%)941 (2.8%)<0.00132 (2%)82 (1.5%)0.210
Pulmonary Circulation Disorders24 (0.4%)90 (0.3%)0.09028 (1.7%)79 (1.5%)0.450
Renal Failure308 (5.0%)1055 (3.1%)<0.001237 (14.7%)724 (13.5%)0.230
Solid Tumor197 (3.2%)384 (1.1%)<0.001115 (7.1%)199 (3.7%)<0.001
Peptic Ulcer0 (0%)5 (0%)0.3400 (0%)0 (0%)
Valvular Disease57 (0.9%)310 (0.9%)0.90075 (4.6%)230 (4.3%)0.540
Weight Loss192 (3.1%)507 (1.5%)<0.001111 (6.9%)283 (5.3%)0.015
Invasive Diagnostic Procedure499 (8.1%)3929 (11.5%)<0.001140 (8.7%)655 (12.2%)<0.001
Medical/Surgical Complication Diagnosis50 (0.8%)268 (0.8%)0.84015 (0.9%)62 (1.2%)0.450
Reoperation0 (0%)349 (1.0%)<0.0010 (0%)159 (3.0%)<0.001
Deceased20 (0.3%)42 (0.1%)<0.00127 (1.7%)46 (0.9%)0.005
Mean (SD)Mean (SD)pMean (SD)Mean (SD)p
Age, Years43.54 (12.02)42.35 (11.86)<0.00175.46 (7.96)74.06 (7.32)<0.001
Modified Frailty Index Score0.91 (1.02)0.72 (0.92)<0.0011.71 (1.11)1.65 (1.11)0.052
Time to Invasive Diagnostic Procedure, Days2.12 (2.23)1.17 (2.40)<0.0013.08 (3.06)2.34 (3.46)0.029
Hospital Length of Stay, Days3.94 (5.33)3.28 (3.81)<0.0015.62 (5.33)5.23 (6.77)0.030
Total Charges, American Dollars22,267
(32,479)
23,062
(32,998)
0.08027,627
(33,924)
32,303
(38,998)
<0.001
Table 3. Characteristics of emergently admitted patients with the primary diagnosis of abscess of anal/rectal regions. Data are classified according to outcome categories, NIS 2004–2014.
Table 3. Characteristics of emergently admitted patients with the primary diagnosis of abscess of anal/rectal regions. Data are classified according to outcome categories, NIS 2004–2014.
Adult, N (%)Elderly, N (%)
SurvivedDeceasedpSurvivedDeceasedp
All Cases40,230 (99.8%)62 (0.2%)6910 (99.0%)73 (1.0%)
Sex, Female12,382 (31.0%)17 (27.4%)0.5502483 (36.0%)34 (46.6%)0.060
RaceWhite18,163 (53.0%)27 (50.0%)0.4604220 (71.7%)51 (78.5%)0.730
Black8015 (23.4%)18 (33.3%)770 (13.1%)8 (12.3%)
Hispanic5670 (16.5%)6 (11.1%)583 (9.9%)5 (7.7%)
Asian/Pacific Islander847 (2.5%)2 (3.7%)127 (2.2%)0 (0%)
Native American272 (0.8%)0 (0%)32 (0.5%)0 (0%)
Other1321 (3.9%)1 (1.9%)153 (2.6%)1 (1.5%)
Income
Quartile
Quartile 113,097 (33.6%)22 (35.5%)0.5602014 (29.8%)21 (30.0%)0.880
Quartile 29936 (25.5%)14 (22.6%)1785 (26.4%)20 (28.6%)
Quartile 38832 (22.6%)11 (17.7%)1618 (23.9%)14 (20.0%)
Quartile 47156 (18.3%)15 (24.2%)1346 (19.9%)15 (21.4%)
InsurancePrivate Insurance18,301 (45.6%)22 (35.5%)<0.001713 (10.3%)3 (4.1%)0.320
Medicare4122 (10.3%)16 (25.8%)5961 (86.4%)70 (95.9%)
Medicaid7075 (17.6%)16 (25.8%)101 (1.5%)0 (0%)
Self-Pay7660 (19.1%)3 (4.8%)46 (0.7%)0 (0%)
No Charge765 (1.9%)0 (0%)5 (0.1%)0 (0%)
Other2195 (5.5%)5 (8.1%)74 (1.1%)0 (0%)
Hospital
Location
Rural4232 (10.6%)4 (6.5%)0.008974 (14.1%)9 (12.3%)0.700
Urban: Non-Teaching16,570 (41.4%)16 (25.8%)3133 (45.5%)31 (42.5%)
Urban: Teaching19,245 (48.1%)42 (67.7%)2785 (40.4%)33 (45.2%)
ComorbiditiesAIDS712 (1.8%)2 (3.2%)0.3005 (0.1%)1 (1.4%)0.060
Alcohol Abuse1257 (3.1%)6 (9.7%)0.003145 (2.1%)1 (1.4%)0.999
Deficiency Anemias3459 (8.6%)11 (17.7%)0.0101395 (20.2%)18 (24.7%)0.340
Rheumatoid Arthritis555 (1.4%)1 (1.6%)0.580199 (2.9%)2 (2.7%)0.999
Chronic Blood Loss180 (0.4%)1 (1.6%)0.24084 (1.2%)2 (2.7%)0.230
Congestive Heart Failure721 (1.8%)11 (17.7%)<0.001868 (12.6%)22 (30.1%)<0.001
Chronic Pulmonary Disease3802 (9.5%)8 (12.9%)0.3501304 (18.9%)24 (32.9%)0.002
Coagulopathy561 (1.4%)12 (19.4%)<0.001227 (3.3%)8 (11.0%)<0.001
Depression2434 (6.1%)3 (4.8%)0.999490 (7.1%)5 (6.8%)0.940
Diabetes, Uncomplicated8700 (21.6%)16 (25.8%)0.4202261 (32.7%)14 (19.2%)0.014
Diabetes, Chronic Complications1311 (3.3%)4 (6.5%)0.140387 (5.6%)3 (4.1%)0.800
Drug Abuse1433 (3.6%)3 (4.8%)0.49020 (0.3%)0 (0%)0.999
Hypertension11,812 (29.4%)29 (46.8%)0.0034601 (66.6%)50 (68.5%)0.730
Hypothyroidism1324 (3.3%)4 (6.5%)0.150754 (10.9%)10 (13.7%)0.450
Liver Disease846 (2.1%)12 (19.4%)<0.001126 (1.8%)2 (2.7%)0.390
Lymphoma188 (0.5%)3 (4.8%)0.003109 (1.6%)1 (1.4%)0.999
Fluid/Electrolyte Disorders4903 (12.2%)28 (45.2%)<0.0011658 (24%)35 (47.9%)<0.001
Metastatic Cancer498 (1.2%)8 (12.9%)<0.001261 (3.8%)8 (11.0%)0.002
Other Neurological Disorders920 (2.3%)6 (9.7%)<0.001495 (7.2%)13 (17.8%)<0.001
Obesity5318 (13.2%)8 (12.9%)0.940674 (9.8%)4 (5.5%)0.320
Paralysis417 (1.0%)0 (0%)0.999153 (2.2%)1 (1.4%)0.999
Peripheral Vascular Disorders415 (1.0%)5 (8.1%)<0.001465 (6.7%)11 (15.1%)0.005
Psychoses1193 (3.0%)1 (1.6%)0.999113 (1.6%)1 (1.4%)0.999
Pulmonary Circulation Disorders113 (0.3%)1 (1.6%)0.160103 (1.5%)4 (5.5%)0.025
Renal Failure1347 (3.3%)16 (25.8%)<0.001933 (13.5%)28 (38.4%)<0.001
Solid Tumor579 (1.4%)2 (3.2%)0.230308 (4.5%)6 (8.2%)0.120
Peptic Ulcer5 (0%)0 (0%)0.9990 (0%)0 (0%)
Valvular Disease366 (0.9%)1 (1.6%)0.430301 (4.4%)4 (5.5%)0.560
Weight Loss691 (1.7%)7 (11.3%)<0.001373 (5.4%)21 (28.8%)<0.001
Invasive Diagnostic Procedure4414 (11.0%)12 (19.4%)0.035779 (11.3%)15 (20.5%)0.013
Surgical Procedure34,082 (84.7%)42 (67.7%)<0.0015322 (77%)46 (63.0%)0.005
Invasive or Surgical Procedure34,579 (86.0%)44 (71.0%)<0.0015460 (79%)48 (65.8%)0.006
Medical/Surgical Complication Diagnosis315 (0.8%)3 (4.8%)0.01372 (1.0%)5 (6.8%)<0.001
Reoperation339 (0.8%)9 (14.5%)<0.001151 (2.2%)8 (11.0%)<0.001
Mean (SD)Mean (SD)pMean (SD)Mean (SD)p
Age, Years42.52 (11.89)51.42 (10.43)<0.00174.33 (7.47)79.44 (8.75)<0.001
Modified Frailty Index Score0.75 (0.94)1.69 (1.21)<0.0011.66 (1.11)2.29 (1.16)<0.001
Time to Invasive Diagnostic Procedure, Days1.28 (2.39)3.92 (4.38)0.0602.38 (3.18)7.00 (7.88)0.047
Time to Surgical Procedure, Days0.64 (1.25)1.62 (2.82)0.0371.10 (4.76)2.84 (4.81)0.023
Hospital Length of Stay, Days3.36 (3.99)14.60 (15.25)<0.0015.25 (6.40)11.62 (9.35)<0.001
Total Charges, American Dollars22,742
(31,511)
159,516
(204,036)
<0.00130,636
(36,797)
84,490
(80,680)
<0.001
Table 4. Backward logistic regression analysis to evaluate the associations between mortality and different risk factors in patients emergently admitted with a primary diagnosis of abscess of anal and rectal regions (NIS 2005–2014). Mortality was the dependent variable.
Table 4. Backward logistic regression analysis to evaluate the associations between mortality and different risk factors in patients emergently admitted with a primary diagnosis of abscess of anal and rectal regions (NIS 2005–2014). Mortality was the dependent variable.
Patients’ CharacteristicsMortality
N = 47,011R2 = 0.357
OR (95% CI)p
Number of EventsN = 135
Age, Years1.03 (1.02, 1.04)<0.001
Surgical Procedure0.49 (0.33, 0.71)<0.001
Hospital Length of Stay, Days1.02 (1.01, 1.03)<0.001
Invasive Procedure1.55 (0.98, 2.46)0.060
Respiratory Diseases4.19 (2.86, 6.13)<0.001
Cardiac Diseases3.60 (2.36, 5.50)<0.001
Liver Diseases3.62 (2.07, 6.32)<0.001
Genitourinary System Diseases3.00 (1.97, 4.56)<0.001
Platelet and White Blood Cell Diseases2.43 (1.59, 3.71)<0.001
Trauma, Burns, and Poisons7.71 (5.31, 11.19)<0.001
Neoplasms1.93 (1.30, 2.87)0.001
Neurological Diseases1.70 (1.15, 2.50)0.008
Sex, FemaleRemoved Via
Stepwise
Backward
Elimination
Bacterial Infections (Other than Tuberculosis)
Coagulopathy
Peripheral Vascular Diseases
Fluid and Electrolyte Disorders
Cerebrovascular Diseases
Tuberculosis
Nonbacterial Infections
Anemia and/or Hemorrhage
Digestive Diseases other than Liver
Diabetes
Drug Abuse/Withdrawal/Dependence
Alcohol Abuse/Withdrawal/Dependence
Tobacco Use
Hypertension
Endocrine Diseases
Nutritional/Weight Disorders
Musculoskeletal System and Connective Tissue Diseases
Psychiatric Diseases
Skin Diseases
Long Term Medication Usage
Diseases of Oral Cavity, Salivary Glands, and Jaw
Sleep Disorders
Lack of Physical Evidence
Inappropriate Diet and Eating Habits
High Risk Lifestyle Behaviors
Social Factors
Table 5. Secondary diagnoses of patients emergently admitted with a primary diagnosis of abscess of anal and rectal regions (NIS 2004–2014). Data are stratified according to survival status.
Table 5. Secondary diagnoses of patients emergently admitted with a primary diagnosis of abscess of anal and rectal regions (NIS 2004–2014). Data are stratified according to survival status.
Adult, N (%)Elderly, N (%)
Lifestyle, Complications, Comorbidities and Secondary Diagnoses (ICD-9 Codes)SurvivedDeceasedp ValueSurvivedDeceasedp Value
Observations40,230 (99.8%)62 (0.2%)6910 (99%)73 (1%)
Tuberculosis (010.0–018.96)4 (0.0%)0 (0%)0.9400 (0%)0 (0%)
Bacterial Infections Other than Tuberculosis (020.0–041.9, 790.7)7037 (18%)36 (58%)<0.0011849 (27%)33 (45%)<0.001
Nonbacterial Infections (042, 795.71, V08, 045.0–139.8, 790.8, and/or presence of Comorbidity of AIDS)3221 (8%)12 (19%)<0.001342 (5%)10 (14%)<0.001
Diabetes (250.0–250.93, V58.67, and/or presence of Comorbidity of Diabetes Uncomplicated or Diabetes Chronic Complications)10,028 (25%)20 (32%)0.1802654 (38%)17 (23%)0.008
Hypertension (401.0–405.99, 796.2, and/or presence of Comorbidity of Hypertension)11,893 (30%)29 (47%)0.0034611 (67%)50 (69%)0.750
Anemia and/or Hemorrhage (280.0–285.9, 784.7, 784.8, and/or presence of Comorbidity of Anemia)4154 (10%)20 (32%)<0.0011703 (25%)28 (38%)0.007
Respiratory Diseases (415.0–417.9, 460–519.9, 784.91, 786, and/or presence of Comorbidity of COPD, ILD or Pulmonary Circulation Disease)5044 (13%)37 (60%)<0.0011818 (26%)53 (73%)<0.001
Coagulopathy (286.0–286.9, 790.92, V58.61, V58.63, and/or presence of Comorbidity of Coagulopathy)1266 (3%)13 (21%)<0.001791 (11%)9 (12%)0.810
Cardiac Diseases (391.X, 392.0, 393.398.99, 410.0–414.9, 420.0–429.9, 794.3X, 785.XX, and/or presence of Comorbidity of CHF or Valvular Diseases)4383 (11%)45 (73%)<0.0013151 (46%)55 (75%)<0.001
Cerebrovascular Diseases (325, 430–438)200 (0.5%)4 (7%)<0.001277 (4%)2 (3%)0.580
Peripheral Vascular Diseases (440–457.9, and/or presence of Comorbidity of Peripheral Vascular Disorders)2925 (7%)12 (19%)<0.0011024 (15%)16 (22%)0.090
Liver Diseases (570–573.9, 790.4, 794.8, and/or presence of Comorbidity of Liver Diseases)1095 (3%)14 (23%)<0.001167 (2%)4 (6%)0.090
Diseases of Digestive System other than Liver (530.00–569.9, 574.0–579.9, 787, 001.0–009.3, and/or presence of Comorbidity of Peptic Ulcer)12,324 (31%)25 (40%)0.1003025 (44%)37 (51%)0.240
Diseases of Oral Cavity, Salivary Glands, and Jaws (520–529)136 (0.3%)0 (0%)0.65023 (0.3%)0 (0%)0.620
Nutritional/Weight Disorders (260–273.9, 275.XX, 277.0–278.8, 783.XX, 799.3–799.4, and/or presence of Comorbidity of Weight Loss)10,251 (26%)22 (36%)0.0703210 (47%)33 (45%)0.830
Endocrine Diseases (240.0–259.9, 991.0–992.9, and/or presence of Comorbidity of Endocrine Diseases)11,073 (28%)24 (39%)0.0493190 (46%)26 (36%)0.070
Genitourinary System Diseases (580.0–629.9, 403.XX, 791.XX, 788.XX, and/or presence of Comorbidity of Renal Diseases)6733 (17%)43 (69%)<0.0012965 (43%)59 (81%)<0.001
Neurological Diseases (317.0–326, 330.0–337.9, 340–359.9, 392, 780.0–780.09, 780.2–780.4, 317–319, 290.XX,
294.XX, 781.0–782.0, and/or presence of Comorbidity of Paralysis or Other Neurological Disorders or Paralysis)
2846 (7%)18 (29%)<0.0011361 (20%)28 (38%)<0.001
Diseases of the Musculoskeletal System and Connective Tissue (274.XX, 710.0–739, and/or presence of Comorbidity of Rheumatoid Arthritis or Lupus)4018 (10%)10 (16%)0.1101730 (25%)22 (30%)0.320
Fluid and Electrolyte Disorders (275.0–276.9, 458.0–459.9, and/or presence of Comorbidity of Fluid and Electrolyte Disorders)5466 (14%)31 (50%)<0.0011871 (27%)38 (52%)<0.001
Neoplasms (140.0–239.9, V10.XX, and/or presence of Comorbidity of Lymphoma, Metastatic Diseases, or Tumor)2785 (7%)21 (34%)<0.0011736 (25%)25 (34%)0.070
Platelet and White Blood Cell Diseases (204.0–208.92, 287.0–288.9, 238.71)2371 (6%)21 (34%)<0.001634 (9%)14 (19%)0.003
Psychiatric Diseases (293.XX, 295.0–302.9, 306.0–316, 780.1, V62.8, V15.4, and/or presence of Comorbidity of Psychoses)4678 (12%)6 (10%)0.630847 (12%)10 (14%)0.710
Skin Diseases (680.0–709.9, 782.1–782.9)5063 (13%)18 (29%)<0.0011206 (18%)21 (29%)0.012
Trauma, Burns and Poisoning (800–999)1592 (4%)37 (60%)<0.001498 (7%)32 (44%)<0.001
Drug Abuse/Withdrawal/Dependence (292.0–292.9, 304.0–304.93, 305.2–305.93, and/or presence of Comorbidity of Drug Abuse)1448 (4%)3 (5%)0.60035 (0.5%)0 (0%)0.540
Alcohol Abuse/Withdrawal/Dependence (291.0–291.9, 303.0–303.93, 305.0–305.03, and/or presence of Comorbidity of Alcohol Abuse)1257 (3%)6 (10%)0.003145 (2%)1 (1%)0.670
Tobacco Use (305.1)12,035 (30%)13 (21%)0.1201321 (19%)6 (8%)0.018
Long-Term Medications/Radiotherapy (V58.0–V58-2, V58.62, V58.64–V58.66, V58.68–V58.69)1881 (5%)6 (10%)0.060702 (10%)5 (7%)0.350
Social Factors (V60.0–V62.6, V63.0–V64.3, V15.81)1742 (4%)1 (2%)0.290138 (2%)2 (3%)0.650
Sleep Disorders (327, 780.5, V69.4, V69.5)1498 (4%)4 (7%)0.260316 (5%)2 (3%)0.460
Lack of Physical Exercise (V69.0)0 (0)0 (0%) 0 (0%)0 (0%)
Inappropriate Diet and Eating Habits (V69.1)0 (0)0 (0%) 0 (0%)0 (0%)
High Risk Lifestyle Behaviors (V69.2, V69.3)5 (0.0)0 (0%)0.9300 (0%)0 (0%)
Body Mass Index of Less than 18.9 (V85.0)87 (4%)0 (0%)0.41043 (13%)0 (0%)0.020
Body Mass Index of 19–24.9 (V85.1)105 (5%)1 (20%)5 (10%)2 (67%)
Body Mass Index of 25.0–29.9 (V85.21–V85.25)157 (7%) 0 (0%)41 (12%)0 (0%)
Body Mass Index of 30.0 and over (V85.30–V85.45)1785 (84%)4 (80%)217 (65%)1 (33%)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ladinsky, A.; Smiley, A.; Latifi, R. Elderly Patients Managed Non-Operatively with Abscesses of the Anorectal Region Have Five Times Higher Rate of Mortality Compared to Non-Elderly. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 5387. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20075387

AMA Style

Ladinsky A, Smiley A, Latifi R. Elderly Patients Managed Non-Operatively with Abscesses of the Anorectal Region Have Five Times Higher Rate of Mortality Compared to Non-Elderly. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023; 20(7):5387. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20075387

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ladinsky, Alexander, Abbas Smiley, and Rifat Latifi. 2023. "Elderly Patients Managed Non-Operatively with Abscesses of the Anorectal Region Have Five Times Higher Rate of Mortality Compared to Non-Elderly" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, no. 7: 5387. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20075387

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop