Next Article in Journal
Influences of Spatial Accessibility and Service Capacity on the Utilization of Elderly-Care Facilities: A Case Study of the Main Urban Area of Chongqing
Previous Article in Journal
Spatiotemporal Variation of Soil Erosion Characteristics in the Qinghai Lake Basin Based on the InVEST Model
Previous Article in Special Issue
Body Composition Parameters Correlate to Depression Symptom Levels in Patients Treated with Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Barriers and Facilitators Related to the Adoption of Policies to Reduce Ultra-Processed Foods Consumption: A Scoping Review

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(6), 4729; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20064729
by Tatiane Nunes Pereira 1,*, Gisele Ane Bortolini 2 and Roberta de Freitas Campos 3
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(6), 4729; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20064729
Submission received: 12 January 2023 / Revised: 24 February 2023 / Accepted: 1 March 2023 / Published: 8 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research on Diet, Nutrition and Chronic Diseases)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

some typos, and grammer please check

please mention what ILSI has been done, with detail information

discussion should be enriched, how about challenges for government, academia, and industry partnerships ? possible harmonization for regulatory on ultra processed foods, and more references should be for a review paper

conclusion does not match the title

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear authors

thank you for presenting a very interesting and actuall topic

The general opinion of the paper is:

it is well written, with proper introduction, methods , discusion and conclusions according to the topic od research.

The possible minor changes could be made in abstract:

describe conclusions that go pro or contra (barriers /facilators) to policies , that you have already stated in conclusion section4.

such as effective communication to public, policies for preventing obesity, country specifc policies ,,.... etc

AND In section 3.4. you can divide pro et contra strategies,

as you mentioned that Usa regulations are not so strict, pressures of food industry, influence on policy

v.s.

European strategies (France ....) that are more strict and concerned about health issues and food

with higher public awareness about health and food

best regards,

the reviewer

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop