Skip to Content
You are currently on the new version of our website. Access the old version .
  • Systematic Review
  • Open Access

13 February 2023

Leisure Programmes in Hospitalised People: A Systematic Review

,
,
,
,
and
1
Department of Health La Ribera, Integrated Health Center of Sueca, 46410 Sueca, Spain
2
Nursing School La Fe, Adscript Centre of University of Valencia, 46026 Valencia, Spain
3
Research Group GREIACC, Health Research Institute La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Abstract

Nurses carry out holistic assessments of patients during hospital admission. This assessment includes the need for leisure and recreation. Different intervention programmes have been developed to meet this need. The aim of this study was to investigate hospital leisure intervention programmes described in the literature in order to determine their effects on patient health and highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the programmes as reported by health professionals. A systematic review of articles in English or Spanish published between 2016 and 2022 was carried out. A search was performed in the following databases: CINAHL COMPLETE, PubMed, Cochrane Library and Dialnet and the Virtual Health Library and Web of Science resources. A total of 327 articles were obtained, of which 18 were included in the review. The methodological quality of the articles was assessed using the PRISMA, CASPe and STROBE scales. A total of six hospital-based leisure programmes were identified, including a total of 14 leisure interventions. The activities developed in most of the interventions effectively reduced the levels of anxiety, stress, fear and pain in patients. They also improved factors such as mood, humour, communication, wellbeing, satisfaction and hospital adaptation. Among the main barriers to implementing hospital leisure activities is the need for more training, time and adequate spaces for them develop. Health professionals consider it beneficial for the patient to develop leisure interventions in the hospital.

1. Introduction

Hospitalisation is a stressful and vulnerable experience in terms of physical and mental health [1,2]. Adult hospitalised patients are at high risk of deterioration of health due to inactivity during their hospitalisation [1]. Similarly, the hospitalisation process in children leads to an imbalance in their development due to a series of stressful and painful situations involving the interruption of their schooling and social life [2]. In order to promote hospital adaptation, a holistic, interdisciplinary and humanised approach to care needs to be incorporated [3], where spaces for leisure, activities, entertainment and socialising are provided [4].
The participation of hospitalised patients in leisure activities is considered part of comprehensive patient care to maintain their physical and mental wellbeing [1]. Therefore, to improve patient-centred care and contribute to a better hospital experience, nurses must support the promotion of leisure and the management of hospital resources [3]. According to Virginia Henderson’s theory, leisure and recreation are basic needs that must be met during care practice [5]. Nowadays, in most cases, different patient associations and/or non-governmental organisations are in charge of covering this psychosocial care focused on leisure and recreation in hospitals [6]. This is why the WHO recommends paying more attention to this need, especially in the European region. To this end, it has issued the “Declaration on Promoting Patients’ Rights in Europe” [7], which serves as a model for other WHO regions [8]. Likewise, the “American Nurses Association” [9] includes in its Code of Ethics the commitment to meet all needs, and the “American Hospital Association” [10] shows the duty of healthcare professionals to achieve high-quality care.
Currently, few studies analyse patients’ leisure experiences in hospitals [11]. In the United States, for example, Fuqua, in 2012, highlighted the benefits of prescribing television viewing as a recreational activity during hospitalisation, with these including relaxation and reduced stress, anxiety and boredom [4]. However, in the UK, the study by Papaspyros et al., in 2008, showed that certain in-hospital leisure activities that can be carried out from the bedside, such as playing games, surfing the web, receiving phone calls, sending emails, watching TV and listening to the radio could hurt post-cardiac surgery patient ambulation and could contribute to increased hospital stays [12]. Similarly, in the UK, patients’ perceptions of hospital environments were explored in two consecutive studies by Douglas and Douglas, in 2004 and 2005 [13,14]. In these studies, patients identified the need for personal space and resources for recreation and leisure, indicating that the design of the hospital environment can have a significant therapeutic effect on the satisfaction and wellbeing of patients and their families. On the other hand, in Finland, Pelander and Leino-Kilpi, in 2010, conducted a study on children, suggesting that leisure could reduce pain, fear and worry [15].
Therefore, it was necessary to conduct a literature review with the aim of: identifying hospital leisure programmes, determining which activities in the programmes have proven to be effective in improving the health and wellbeing of patients, and establishing the strengths and weaknesses of hospital leisure programmes as pointed out by healthcare professionals.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Design

A qualitative systematic review was conducted between February 2021 and October 2022, following the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement (PRISMA) [16]. The review was conducted using Cochrane guidelines, taking into consideration the Joanna Briggs Institute programme [17,18].
The research question was described by the acronym PIO (patient, intervention and outcome). In this systematic review, the following research question was established: What is the effect of hospital leisure programmes carried out during the leisure time of hospitalised patients?

2.2. Search Strategy

First of all, the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) [19] and the Descriptors of Health Sciences (DeCS) [20] thesauri were identified: “leisure activities”, “actividades recreativas”, “play therapy”, “ludoterapia”, “bibliotherapy”, “biblioterapia”, “art therapy”, “terapia con arte”, “musicteraphy”, “musicoterapia”, “hospitals” and “hospitales”. In addition, the following keywords were also identified from synonyms and MeSH and DeCS-related terms: “lively”, “animación”, “entertainment”, “entretenimiento”, “laughter therapy”, “risoterapia”, “clown” and “payaso”.
Secondly, two researchers independently searched the following electronic databases: CINAHL COMPLETE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Dialnet, Virtual Health Library and Web of Science. Table 1 shows the search strategies used in each database by linking the descriptors and/or keywords using the Boolean operators “OR” and “AND”. Table A1 shows the most accurate search strategy performed in each database.
Table 1. Database search strategy.

2.3. Selection Criteria

We included articles meeting our objectives published between 2016 and October 2022 written in English and Spanish.
We excluded articles that addressed the effect of hospital leisure only on a specific disease or in a narrow age range or that addressed the impact of hospital leisure during interventions and not during leisure time.

2.4. The Study Selection Process

First, the records obtained from each database were dumped into a bibliographic manager (n = 327), whereby 35 duplicate articles were identified and removed.
Secondly, two independent researchers screened the records obtained based on the title and abstract (n = 292) to verify compliance with the selection criteria.
A total of 167 articles were selected and retrieved in full text, of which three articles could not be recovered.
Finally, 164 articles were thoroughly reviewed in their entirety to determine their inclusion in the review. A total of 20 papers were selected for a review of their methodological quality, of which 17 met the stipulated methodological quality. In addition, one new study was identified through a reverse search from other methods that met the selection criteria. Thus, a total of 18 articles were selected.

2.5. Research Variables

The information obtained was classified according to the variables: hospital leisure programmes, the effectiveness of the leisure activities included in the programmes and the strengths and weaknesses of hospital leisure programmes as reported by health professionals.

2.6. Methodological Quality, Level of Evidence and Grade of Recommendation

The methodological quality was established based on the critical reading and assessment of the selected articles. For this purpose, two independent researchers used the tools Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) [16], Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Español (CASPe) [21] and Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) [22]. A minimum score of 25 points was set for PRISMA, 7 points for CASPe and 18 points for STROBE.
The level of evidence and grade of recommendation was established on the scale of the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) [23].

3. Results

A total of 18 articles were included in the review. The flow chart of the study selection process is shown in Figure 1. Regarding the design of the articles, 17% (n = 3) are systematic reviews, 5.5% (n = 1) is represented by a cross-design experimental study and another 5.5% (n = 1) a quasi-experimental mixed methods study, 50% (n = 9) are observational studies and 22% (n = 4) are qualitative studies. Table 2 shows the general characteristics and main results of the included studies.
Figure 1. Flow chart of the study selection process.
Table 2. General characteristics and main results of the included studies.

3.1. Analysis of Quality

Regarding methodological quality, systematic reviews were found to be of high quality, according to the PRISMA statement. Most articles that were critically read with the CASPe programme scored 9. According to the STROBE guide, the observational studies obtained a score of 19 and 20.
Regarding the level of evidence, most were found to have a level of evidence of 3 and 4, and a grade of recommendation of D, since the studies had a number of limitations regarding the sample, observer bias and the use of non-validated questionnaires. Thus, certain authors indicate uncertainty as to whether their results could be generalisable. Table 2 shows the quality analysis of the selected studies.

3.2. Hospital Leisure Programmes

The results of the selected studies showed that the central hospital leisure interventions are grouped into: music, art, humour, electronic, accompanying and other types of programmes (Table 3).
Table 3. Summary of the relationship between leisure programmes, interventions and activities and their effects.
The music programmes included passive or active music interventions [24,25,26]. The passive music interventions consisted of assisted relaxation activities and the synchronisation of breathing [24]. The active music interventions, on the other hand, consisted of singing activities, songwriting, playing instruments [24] and using live music in conjunction with guided images [25].
In the study by Ford et al. [26], music and art interventions were implemented, including music listening and personalised songwriting activities with musicians and groups and art activities for patients and family members such as painting, plasticine modelling, printing, collage and drawing. Similarly, in another study, activities such as making jewellery, sun catchers and chimes were carried out as art therapy [27].
In humour programmes, it was noted that laughter therapy includes a wide range of activities such as singing funny songs, laughing for diversion, stretching, playing with hands and dance routines, laughing exercises, healthy clapping and laughing aloud [28]. Several studies [29,30] reported that the activities and skills performed by the hospital clown were interdisciplinary, encompassing humour, drama, music, dance and play.
Regarding electronic media-based programmes, leisure activities associated with electronic devices such as tablets [31] and computers [32] with internet access were found.
The accompaniment programmes are divided into two types of interventions: animal or personal accompaniment, where patients themselves, professionals or other external groups may be involved [32,33].
Other innovative activities mentioned in the studies include therapeutic play, acupuncture and animal entertainment, among others [32,33].

3.3. Effectiveness of the Leisure Activities Included in the Programmes

The leisure activities included in the programmes demonstrate significant changes at the biopsychosocial care level. The effects of the leisure activities are presented in Table 3.
Three articles [24,25,26] observed changes in patients following the implementation of music-related activities. People went from feeling anxious, agitated, restless and in pain to feeling calm, content and comfortable during and after the session [24]. In addition, these musical activities produced relaxation and decreased anxiety [25]. The activities of “listening to live music followed by guided relaxation” and “playing instruments” improved mood and reduced pain in patients [34].
The music therapy sessions also allowed patients to share personal feelings. Moreover, significant results were found in terms of decreased pain, anxiety, respiratory rates and heart rates in both active and passive activities [24]. In addition, music and drama workshops were beneficial for the avoidance of problems in people with mental illness [35]. The participatory art interventions allowed the emotions of joy, laughter, sadness and longing to flow among the patients and provided a sense of pleasure, calm and belonging to the group. It also gave the relatives a sense of comfort that their relative was not alone [26]. Art activities improved mood, anxiety and pain [27]. The leisure interventions had positive effects on patients and brought other benefits, such as refurbishing the rooms and providing access to music or painting [24].
Humour was found to be a complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapy beneficial for relaxation, increased wellbeing and hospital satisfaction [36] as well as for a reduction in anxiety, stress and fear [29], even in children [30]. In adults in long-stay hospitalisation, laughter therapy leisure activities significantly decreased depression and improved sleep quality [28]. However, the medical clowns had a negative effect on the majority of adults [37], and even a fear of the clown figure was experienced among children [30].
Accompaniment by animals decreased pain and anxiety and increased quality of life, socialisation, hospital adaptation, mobility, collaboration, relaxation, pleasure and fun [32].
Young people and adults affirmed the positive consequences of hospital activity interventions, such as: improving mood, reducing stress, promoting communication, relieving the companion and adapting the patient to the hospital [33].
Access to a tablet during patients’ hospitalisation increased patient engagement and perceived satisfaction with their care and hospitalisation experience [31].

3.4. Strengths and Weaknesses Reported by Health Professionals about Hospital Leisure Programmes

Healthcare professionals perceived that the leisure activities carried out in hospitals during patients’ free time have strengths and weaknesses.
Most of the nurses who responded to the questionnaire in the study by Baltacı Göktaş et al. in 2017 [38] mentioned that they were aware of the positive health-related effects of music and its role in regulating vital signs. However, a large proportion affirmed that they do not have adequate training, time or working conditions to carry out this resource.
The nurses explained that artistic interventions were necessary to provide more personalised, person-centred care rather than task-based care. Thus, the nurses supported the benefits of these activities and that the activities allowed them to get to know people better, provoking in them a sense of enjoyment and forgetfulness [26].
Regarding the leisure interventions provided by clowns, most health professionals perceived these activities as beneficial and helpful in reducing anxiety levels [30,37,39,40], taking into account that they did not need to interfere with the medical team [40,41]. Although the clowns were reported to be mostly only placed in paediatric wards [37], nurses felt reassured that the child was being accompanied by the clown [30] and noted improved adaptation to the hospital environment and family collaboration in treatment [39]. It was noted that the main barrier to clown availability was financial. The presence of clowns was found to be cost-effective compared to anaesthetics [40]. Paediatricians reported positive experiences with hospital clown interactions; however, they expressed doubts about the benefits of hospital clowning [41].
As a means of coping with pain and alleviating suffering, Bermúdez Rey et al., in 2019, highlighted in their study the opinion of healthcare staff, who concluded that it was important to carry out leisure programmes to alleviate suffering, cope with pain and humanise hospitals [33]. Table 3 shows the general characteristics of the different studies selected.

4. Discussion

Studies show that most adult hospitalised patients spend their free time during hospitalisation watching television, reading or listening to music, etc., although they affirm that patients would prefer other leisure activities if they were offered in the hospital [33]. In the child population, studies show that children routinely carry out similar activities in their bedrooms [42].
According to the articles reviewed in this study, regarding age and the demand for leisure activities, it can be observed that the older the age, the less demand there is for leisure activities. This may be because older people are more disinterested in leisure activities because they believe these activities do not bring about changes in them. This negative view may be related to their perception of health, increased pathologies, the tendency towards chronicity, the risk of disability and the vulnerability of the elderly. Bermúdez Rey et al., in 2019, argued that implementing leisure activities could reverse this negative view [33]. These results coincide with the study carried out by the same author at the Hospital La Fe in Valencia [43]. However, another study conducted with older people found that people and their relatives reported that they were satisfied with participatory art, music and comedy activities [27], with their mood improving after the activity [26].
Studies by Boulayoune et al., published in 2020 [30], and Sridharan and Sivaramakrishnan, published in 2016 [29], indicate the benefits of hospital entertainment for children, with indirect benefits for their parents. These findings are consistent with an earlier study, where parents rated the effect of hospital entertainment very positively, stating that it gave them peace of mind [42]. In another study exploring parents’ views on volunteering in hospital activities, 100% of parents supported this intervention [6]. In addition, it has been shown that the inclusion of relatives in different recreational activities provides a higher level of satisfaction [24,27].
Regarding the effects of hospital leisure activities, it has been observed that, as a result of leisure activities the hospital environment becomes a less clinical and more welcoming place for patients and relatives. Participants in the 2018 study by Ford et al. [26] affirmed a sense of pleasure, calm and belonging when decorating the unit. Similarly, in a previous study [42], both children and parents admitted that they would change the decoration of their room, with more than half of the sample stating that they would prefer individual rooms with more colour, games, pictures and space for education, leisure and play as well as access to outdoor spaces.
Another effect of leisure use worth mentioning is the way its increase patients’ abilities to cope with pain [24,25,26,29,34]. In addition, the use of leisure activities showed that by alleviating pain, the development of other problems such as depression, insomnia, weight gain, reduced mobility and reduced socialisation was avoided. This is explained by that fact that when investing time in a satisfying leisure activity, the person’s attention is diverted away from the focus of the pain [43].
The leisure programmes offered in this research include music [24,25,26,34], art [26,27], humour [28,29,30], electronic entertainment [31,32], companionship [32,33] and other programmes [32,33]. In addition, one study is developing a virtual reality entertainment programme which can connect people from adjacent rooms to reduce stress and boredom which could involve all hospitalised patients, including those isolated by infection or immunosuppression. It would also reduce hospital costs, since it would not be necessary to hire staff to carry it out [44].
In the studies reviewed, it was observed that the activities targeted at people of all ages are: active music sessions, painting, chatting, walking, reading, listening to music, hobbies, playing therapeutic games, massages and active music sessions. Passive music sessions have only been studied in patients over 10 years of age. Hospital clowning is aimed at children and their carers, while laughter therapy sessions are aimed at under-18s, along with the use of computers and animal companionship. The use of tablets is aimed at over 18s. Activities for adults include: bead-making and handicrafts, professional accompaniment, guided discussion groups, board games, parties, visits by adult patients to paediatric patients and workshops of different types. Drawing and room decoration activities are aimed at the elderly.
Concerning musical activities, the studies by Scheufler et al. [25] and West and Silverman in 2020 [34] supported the same three interventions: listening to the hospitalised patients’ favourite music, the active creation of music with instruments and listening to live music together with guided imagery. From this research, it could be seen that music takes a leading role in inhibiting problems, enhancing relaxation and reducing anxiety. Most participants listened to their favourite live music (passive music) [24,25,34]. This activity resulted in more relaxation and decreased somatic anxiety [25]. In addition, music and drama workshops were beneficial for the avoidance of problems in people with mental illness [35].
Clown activities are closely related to laughter therapy, which reduces anxiety, stress and fear in children and parents [30]. Hospital clowns have interdisciplinary skills such as magic, theatre, music, play, dance and humour, which are therapeutically valuable activities. Play is the therapeutic tool that provides the most significant sense of security for the child [29,30]. However, depending on the patient’s age and affective state, satisfaction with the clown’s intervention varies [37,39]. It is therefore necessary to assess and adapt the interventions for each hospitalised patient according to their needs and the state of their illness [30].
However, certain people would be willing to pay for humour therapy to achieve stress management [36]. Losada et al., in 2019 [45], affirmed that now is the right moment to make a paradigm shift, using laughter to help tolerate problems. However, he warned that this therapy should never be forced [45], as cases have been found where the child does not enjoy the clown’s visit [46].
Likewise, healthcare staff regard the hospital clown very positively; they admit that the clown is useful and relieves anxiety in children and parents [30,39,40] and believe that this resource should not only be in paediatric wards [37]. However, in a study where the opinions of paediatricians were collected, they affirmed that they needed to learn the exact benefits of this resource and set conditions to collaborate with them in the hospital [41]. It follows that for the hospital clown to provide relief and entertainment to the hospitalised patients [30,39,41], it is essential that there is good communication with the healthcare team and that the clown does not interfere with their work [40,41].
The perception of healthcare staff regarding the implementation of play activities in the hospital is mostly positive, with them admitting that they are necessary activities to achieve more personalised and humane care [27,40]. Similarly, it is essential to note that nurses are interested in learning techniques and skills to entertain and improve patient satisfaction [27]. In addition, they admit that through these activities they get to know their patients better and feel more comforted by them [27,39]. However, according to certain nurses, implementing play activities in the hospital has limitations such as a lack of resources, the fear of professionals and a lack of time and training [38]. They also admit that for a successful art programme, it is necessary to personalise the activities according to the abilities and needs of the patients [26].

Limitations of the Review

The limitations of this review include the need for more studies with information on the subject, the impossibility of containing all the records identified due to difficulties in accessing a number of manuscripts and the small sample size in most of the studies, which had an impact on external validity. Therefore, multi-centre research with robust designs and an adequate sample size is needed to explore the efficacy of hospital leisure activities. On the other hand, it would be interesting to analyse who is the most suitable person to carry out this type of activity, whether the health professionals themselves or, on the contrary, people from outside the institution. Likewise, it would be helpful to analyse how implementing these activities is perceived in the context of the dynamics of the healthcare team.

5. Conclusions

Leisure interventions carried out during leisure time positively impact and promote the wellbeing of hospitalised patients. Leisure proposals during the hospital stay revolve around music, interactions with the hospital clown, art activities, the use of electronic tablets and various workshops.
Hospital leisure effectively reduces pain, stress, fear and anxiety, improves mood, humour and communication and promotes adaptation to the hospital, providing a greater sense of calm, wellbeing, belonging and satisfaction. Leisure programmes have the same effect on children, adults and the elderly, with the exception of the hospital clown, which has a greater effect on children.
Healthcare staff are willing to learn and carry out recreational activities and acknowledge that they help to achieve more personalised and humane care.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, P.A.-C. and E.M.S.-P.; methodology, P.A.-C. and E.M.S.-P.; software, C.S.-O.; validation, E.M.S.-P., M.I.M.-L. and C.S.-O.; formal analysis, L.C.-B.; investigation, P.A.-C.; resources, P.A.-C.; data curation, P.G.-M.; writing—original draft preparation, L.C.-B. and M.I.M.-L.; writing—review and editing, L.C.-B. and M.I.M.-L.; visualisation, E.M.S.-P.; supervision, E.M.S.-P. and C.S.-O.; project administration, P.G.-M.; funding acquisition, P.G.-M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. Search strings for each database.
Table A1. Search strings for each database.
DATABASESEARCH STRINGS
CINAHL COMPLETE(leisure activities OR animation OR play therapy OR clown OR bibliotherapy OR art therapy OR music therapy) AND (hospitals)
(animation OR entertainment OR laughter therapy) AND (hospitals)
PUBMED((((((leisure activities [Title/Abstract]) OR (play therapy [Title/Abstract])) OR (clown [Title/Abstract])) OR (bibliotherapy [Title/Abstract])) OR (art therapy [Title/Abstract])) OR (music therapy [Title/Abstract])) AND (hospitals [Title/Abstract])
(((lively [Title/Abstract]) OR (entertainment [Title/Abstract])) OR (laughter therapy [Title/Abstract])) AND (hospitals [Title/Abstract])
VIRTUAL HEALTH LIBRARY(leisure activities) OR (play therapy) OR (clown) OR (bibliotherapy) OR (art therapy) OR (music therapy) AND (hospitals)
(lively) OR (entertainment) OR (laughter therapy) AND (hospitals)
WEB OF SCIENCE(leisure activities) OR (play therapy) OR (clown) OR (bibliotherapy) OR (art therapy) OR (music therapy) AND (hospitals)
(lively) OR (entertainment) OR (laughter therapy) AND (hospitals)
COCHRANE LIBRARYleisure activities OR play therapy OR clown OR bibliotherapy OR art therapy OR music therapy AND hospitals
lively OR entertainment OR laughter therapy AND hospitals
DIALNETleisure activities OR play therapy OR clown OR bibliotherapy OR art therapy OR music therapy AND hospitals
lively OR entertainment OR laughter therapy AND hospitals

References

  1. Clarke, C.; Stack, C.; Martin, M. Lack of meaningful activity on acute physical hospital wards: Older people’s experiences. Br. J. Occup. Ther. 2018, 81, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gutiérrez Gutiérrez, K.; Cardona Lozada, T.A.; Ortiz Escobar, C.P. Jugar para sanar: La mediación de los padres a partir del juego y del juguete en el proceso de hospitalización del niño en el Hospital Infantil Santa Ana. In Dinámicas Actuales de Investigación. Los Jóvenes Buscan y Descubren/Corporación Universitaria Lasallista; Lasallista: Caldas, Colombia, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  3. Van Rooyen, D.; Janine, P. Foundations of Nursing Practice: Fundamentals of Holistic Care; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  4. Fuqua, J.V. Convalescent Companions: Hospital Entertainment before Television". Prescription TV: Therapeutic Discourse in the Hospital and at Home; Duke University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 23–48. [Google Scholar]
  5. Henderson, V. Principios Fundamentales De Los Cuidados De Enfermeria. Available online: https://iris.paho.org/bitstream/handle/10665.2/14985/v44n3p217.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed on 12 February 2021).
  6. Bermúdez Rey, M.T. Animación sociocultural en el Hospital Materno Infantil de Oviedo: La experiencia del voluntariado de Cruz Roja. Pulso Revista de Educación 2011, 34, 89–99. Available online: https://doaj.org/article/986002adc6a64304ac1f9bd7ae692295 (accessed on 24 February 2021). [CrossRef]
  7. PRE-MAX Consortium; European Comission Patients’ Rights in the European Union-Mapping eXercise. Final Report. 2016. Available online: http://www.activecitizenship.net/multimedia/import/files/patients_rights/charter-of-rights/publications-of-the-charter/Patients_Rights_in_the_European_Union.pdf (accessed on 12 March 2021).
  8. Leenen, H.J.J. Development of Patients’ Rights and Instruments for the Promotion of Patients’ Rights. Eur. J. Health Law 1996, 3, 105–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. American Nurses Association (ANA) Center of Ethics and Human Rights. The Nurse’s Role in Ethics and Human Rights: Protecting and Promoting Individual Worth, Dignity, and Human Rights in Practice Settings. Available online: https://www.nursingworld.org/~4af078/globalassets/docs/ana/ethics/ethics-and-human-rights-protecting-and-promoting-final-formatted-20161130.pdf (accessed on 27 March 2021).
  10. American Hospital Association. The Patient Care Partnership. Understanding Expectations, Rights and Responsabilities. J. Eng. 2018. Available online: https://www.aha.org/other-resources/patient-care-partnership (accessed on 2 March 2021).
  11. Chan, Z.C.; Wu, C.M.; Yip, C.H.; Yau, K.K. Getting through the day: Exploring patients’ leisure experiences in a private hospital. J. Clin. Nurs. 2012, 21, 3257–3267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Papaspyros, S.; Uppal, S.; Khan, S.A.; Paul, S.; O’Regan, D.J. Analysis of bedside entertainment services’ effect on post cardiac surgery physical activity: A prospective, randomised clinical trial. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2008, 34, 1022–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Douglas, C.H.; Douglas, M.R. Patient-friendly hospital environments: Exploring the patients’ perspective. Health Expect 2004, 7, 61–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Douglas, C.H.; Douglas, M.R. Patient-centred improvements in health-care built environments: Perspectives and design indicators. Health Expect 2005, 8, 264–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pelander, T.; Leino-Kilpi, H. Children’s best and worst experiences during hospitalisation. Scand. J. Caring Sci. 2010, 24, 726–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Page, M.J.; Mckenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 88, 105906. [Google Scholar]
  17. Peters, M.; Godfrey, C.; McInerney, P.; Munn, Z.; Tricco, A.C.; Khalil, H. Chapter 11: Scoping Reviews (2020 version). JBI Man. Evid. Synth. 2020. Available online: https://synthesismanual.jbi.global (accessed on 28 March 2021). [CrossRef]
  18. Higgins, J.; Green, S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. Chichester, UK, 2011. Available online: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current (accessed on 6 February 2023).
  19. Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)-NCBI. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/ (accessed on 8 April 2021).
  20. Health Sciences Descriptors. Available online: https://decs.bvsalud.org/I/homepagei.htm (accessed on 3 February 2021).
  21. Instrumentos Para la Lectura Crítica | CASPe. Available online: https://redcaspe.org/materiales/ (accessed on 20 April 2021).
  22. von Elm, E.; Altman, D.G.; Egger, M.; Pocock, S.J.; Gøtzsche, P.C.; Vandenbroucke, J.P. Declaración de la Iniciativa STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology): Directrices para la comunicación de estudios observacionales. Gac. Sanit 2008, 22, 144–150. Available online: https://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0213-91112008000200011 (accessed on 7 April 2021). [CrossRef]
  23. Manterola, C.; Asenjo-Lobos, C.; Otzen, T. Jerarquización de la evidencia: Niveles de evidencia y grados de recomendación de uso actual. Rev. Chil. De Infectología 2014, 31, 705–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Fallek, R.; Corey, K.; Qamar, A.; Vernisie, S.N.; Hoberman, A.; Selwyn, P.A.; Fausto, J.A.; Marcus, P.; Kvetan, V.; Lounsbury, D.W. Soothing the heart with music: A feasibility study of a bedside music therapy intervention for critically ill patients in an urban hospital setting. Palliat. Support. Care 2020, 18, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Scheufler, A.; Wallace, D.P.; Fox, E. Comparing Three Music Therapy Interventions for Anxiety and Relaxation in Youth With Amplified Pain. J. Music. Ther. 2020, 58, 177–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ford, K.; Tesch, L.; Dawborn, J.; Courtney-Pratt, H. Art, music, story: The evaluation of a person-centred arts in health programme in an acute care older persons’ unit. Int. J. Older People Nurs. 2018, 13, e12186. Available online: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/opn.12186 (accessed on 17 April 2021). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Shella, T.A. Art therapy improves mood, and reduces pain and anxiety when offered at bedside during acute hospital treatment. Arts Psychother. 2018, 57, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Han, J.H.; Park, K.M.; Park, H. Effects of Laughter Therapy on Depression and Sleep among Patients at Long-term Care Hospitals. Sŏngin Kanho Hakhoe Chi 2017, 29, 560–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sridharan, K.; Sivaramakrishnan, G. Therapeutic clowns in pediatrics: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2016, 175, 1353–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Boulayoune, S.; Matabuena-Gómez-Limón, M.R.; Ventura-Puertos, P.E. Efectos fisiológicos y psicológicos de la risoterapia en la población pediátrica: Una revisión sistematizada. Actual. Med. 2020, 105, 114–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Vink, S.; Fareed, N.; MacEwan, S.R.; McAlearney, A.S. An Exploration of the Association between Inpatient Access to Tablets and Patient Satisfaction with Hospital Care. Perspect. Health Inf. Manag. 2019, 16. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6931050/ (accessed on 16 April 2021).
  32. Barros, I.; Lourenço, M.; Nunes, E.; Charepe, Z. Intervenções de Enfermagem Promotoras da Adaptação da Criança/Jovem/Família à Hospitalização: Uma Scoping Review. Enf. Glob. 2021, 20. Available online: https://scielo.isciii.es/pdf/eg/v20n61/pt_1695-6141-eg-20-61-539.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2023). [CrossRef]
  33. Bermúdez Rey, M.T.; Alonso Domínguez, Á.; Arnaiz García, A. Ocio ético: Afrontando la alienación y la deshumanización en los hospitales. Rev. Esp. Sociol (RES) 2019. Available online: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7375339 (accessed on 18 April 2021).
  34. Rebecca, W.; Michael, J.S. A music therapy feasibility study with adults on a hospital neuroscience unit: Investigating service user technique choices and immediate effects on mood and pain. Arts Psychother. 2020, 67, 101585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ørjasæter, K.B.; Davidson, L.; Hedlund, M.; Bjerkeset, O.; Ness, O. “I now have a life!” Lived experiences of participation in music and theater in a mental health hospital. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0209242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Montross-Thomas, L.P.; Meier, E.A.; Reynolds-Norolahi, K.; Raskin, E.E.; Slater, D.; Mills, P.J.; MacElhern, L.; Kallenberg, G. Inpatients’ Preferences, Beliefs, and Stated Willingness to Pay for Complementary and Alternative Medicine Treatments. J Altern Complement Med. 2017, 23, 259–263. Available online: https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/acm.2016.0288 (accessed on 20 April 2021). [CrossRef]
  37. Efrat-Triester, D.; Altman, D.; Friedmann, E.; Margalit, D.L.; Teodorescu, K. Exploring the usefulness of medical clowns in elevating satisfaction and reducing aggressive tendencies in pediatric and adult hospital wards. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2021, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Baltaci Goktas, S.; Yildiz, T.; Kosucu, S.N.; Ates, D. A hospital-based survey on the perception of music therapy among nurses and midwives. Eur. J. Ther. 2017, 22, 190–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Masetti, M.; Caires, S.; Brandão, D.; Vieira, D.A. Confirmatory factor analysis of the Questionnaire on the Health Staff’s Perceptions Regarding Doutores da Alegria’s Interventions. J. Health Psychol. 2019, 24, 166–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gomberg, J.; Raviv, A.; Fenig, E.; Meiri, N. Saving Costs for Hospitals Through Medical Clowning: A Study of Hospital Staff Perspectives on the Impact of the Medical Clown. Clin. Med. Insights Pediatr. 2020, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Van Venrooij, L.; Barnhoorn, P. Hospital clowning: A paediatrician’s view. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2017, 176, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rey, M.T.B.; de Sousa Lopes, M.; Âguia, M.R.P.S. La animación hospitalaria en el Centro Hospitalario de Chaves (Portugal). Campo Abierto. Rev. De Educ. 2011, 30, 95–106. Available online: https://mascvuex.unex.es/revistas/index.php/campoabierto/article/view/1511 (accessed on 28 July 2021).
  43. Bermúdez Rey, M.T.; Martín Palacio, M.E.; Castellanos Cano, S. Animación Hospitalaria Con Pacientes Adultos En El Hospital La Fe De Valencia: Un Estudio De Necesidades. Bordón 2013, 65, 9–24. Available online: https://web.s.ebscohost.com/abstract?direct=true&profile=ehost&scope=site&authtype=crawler&jrnl=02105934&AN=88917348&h=vZIrcZHvph4c5pe5WZmzV1m0zc33SBJesseJOGkxSGJrzP%2bHVAXBDKFHk7VeoAxkSUkA%2f04bb0WYlLISEBhCcQ%3d%3d&crl=c&resultNs=AdminWebAuth&resultLocal=ErrCrlNotAuth&crlhashurl=login.aspx%3fdirect%3dtrue%26profile%3dehost%26scope%3dsite%26authtype%3dcrawler%26jrnl%3d02105934%26AN%3d88917348 (accessed on 28 July 2021). [CrossRef]
  44. Lechat, L.; Menschaert, L.; De Smedt, T.; Nijs, L.; Dhar, M.; Norga, K.; Toelen, J. Medical Art Therapy of the Future: Building an Interactive Virtual Underwater World in a Children’s Hospital. In Computational Intelligence in Music, Sound, Art and Design; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 64–77. [Google Scholar]
  45. Losada, A.V.; Lacasta, M. Sentido del Humor y sus Beneficios en Salud. CdVS 2019, 12, 2–22. Available online: http://revistacdvs.uflo.edu.ar/index.php/CdVUFLO/article/view/172 (accessed on 27 April 2021).
  46. Ford, K.; Courtney-Pratt, H.; Tesch, L.; Johnson, C. More than just clowns – Clown Doctor rounds and their impact for children, families and staff. J. Child. Health Care 2014, 18, 286–296. Available online: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1367493513490447 (accessed on 26 April 2021). [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.