Next Article in Journal
Prevalence of Physical Violence in the Medical-Forensic Approach in the Years 2015–2020 in City and Neighboring Municipalities: Perspectives from Poland—Poznań Study
Previous Article in Journal
Association between Asthma and Oral Health Symptoms in Adolescents
Previous Article in Special Issue
Transcutaneous Vagal Stimulation in Knee Osteoarthritis (TRAVKO): Protocol of a Superiority, Outcome Assessor- and Participant-Blind, Randomised Controlled Trial
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 20
Issue 4
10.3390/ijerph20042923
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bone Health Status in Individuals with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Cross-Sectional Study on the Role of the Trabecular Bone Score and Its Implications in Neurorehabilitation

by
Elisabetta Morini
1,
Simona Portaro
2,
Danilo Leonetti
3,
Maria Cristina De Cola
1,
Rosaria De Luca
1,
Mirjam Bonanno
1,
Angelo Quartarone
1 and
Rocco Salvatore Calabrò
1,*
1
IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo, S.S. 113 Via Palermo, C.da Casazza, 98124 Messina, Italy
2
Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Unit, Policlinico Universitario, 98125 Messina, Italy
3
Department of Biomedical, Dental and Morphological and Functional Images, Section of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(4), 2923; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20042923
Submission received: 6 December 2022 / Revised: 30 January 2023 / Accepted: 5 February 2023 / Published: 7 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bone and Joint Health and Rehabilitation)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background and Objectives: Osteoporosis is a metabolic skeletal disease resulting in low bone mass with increased bone fragility and susceptibility to fractures. May lead to rapid loss of bone mineral density (BMD) due to physical inactivity and reduced muscle contractions. Generally, the diagnosis of osteoporosis is made using dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), by measuring BMD and the trabecular bone score (TBS), which can be useful for detecting bone fragility and susceptibility to fractures. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate, using BMD and TBS, the bone health status in a sample of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) inpatients attending neurorehabilitation. Materials and Methods: Thirty-nine patients were included in the study and underwent electrocardiogram and blood tests, including calcium and parathyroid hormone, as well as vitamin D dosage, and DXA. Results: We found that the TBS of patients with osteoporosis was lower than that of those ALS patients with osteopenia or normal bone status, both in the lumbar spine and femoral neck, although no statistical significance was reached. In addition, Spearman’s correlation coefficient indicated a moderate correlation between TBS and lumbar spine BMD (r = −0.34) and a mild correlation between TBS and femoral neck BMD (r = −0.28). Conclusions: This study confirmed the hypothesis that ALS patients may exhibit deteriorated bone health with lower bone density and focused on the possible role of the TBS in the multidisciplinary approach to ALS.

1. Introduction

Osteoporosis is a metabolic skeletal disease resulting in low bone mass, reporting ≤ 2.5 standard deviations below peak bone mass, and abnormal bone structural architecture0 with increased bone fragility and susceptibility to fractures. Such osteoporotic fractures mainly occur in vertebrae, proximal femur and distal forearm and are responsible for significant reductions in patients’ quality of life, as well as increased disability, and social and economic burden [1]. The biological mechanisms of osteoporosis are most likely attributable to the augmented activity of osteoclasts and the reduced activity of osteoblasts, or both, determining an imbalance in bone health status, with rapid bone resorption and attenuated bone formation [2]. Further, osteoporosis can be classified as primary (including type I and type II) and secondary. Primary osteoporosis is common in post-menopausal women and in elderly people (both men and women over seventy years of age), whereas secondary osteoporosis is caused by systemic diseases, medical treatments or idiopathic diseases [3]. The menopausal transition represents a critical period for bone health in women. In fact, the decrease in bone mass is often accompanied by changes in the macro- and micro-structures of bone due to changes in sex steroid hormones, which increase bone resorption [4].
Neurological diseases may lead to rapid loss of bone mineral density (BMD) due to physical inactivity and reduced muscle contractions [5]. In fact, skeletal muscles provide certain anabolic stimuli for bone remodelling and are a source of osteogenic stem cells that play an important role in maintaining bone homeostasis [6]. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative and still incurable condition characterised by severe muscle atrophy linked to the progressive loss of motor neurons. Clinically, ALS can be distinguished into two types, the bulbar and the medullary forms, depending on whether the upper or lower neurons are affected at onset, respectively [7]. In both ALS types, muscle weakness, disability, swallowing, breathing and walking alterations can occur, and often, respiratory failure is the final cause of death [8]. Musculoskeletal functional deterioration in ALS is associated with an increase in pathological bone fractures (i.e., induced by low-energy traumatic events) due to a decrease in bone density (Figure 1) [9,10,11].
Among other factors, ALS may also be associated with malnutrition and changes in energy expenditure, and this may lead to further muscle fibre loss as well as bone abnormalities [12]. Moreover, the increased risk of fracture may also be related to deficient intake of some minerals, such as calcium, and excessive intake of sodium and phosphorous [13]. Notably, the serum concentration of calcium is also influenced by Vitamin D (Vit D), which helps in calcium absorption in the bone. Vit D is a fat-soluble molecule that is introduced with the diet as well as through the skin and its exposure to sunlight; it is involved in maintaining muscle mass and strength [14], beside other important effects on the neurological system.
However, the aetiology of bone loss in ALS is under debate, even though several authors have hypothesised a multifactorial genesis (i.e., genetic causes, environment, reduced physical activity and frequent-fall risk/fractures) [15].
Generally, the diagnosis of osteoporosis is made using dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), which is the most widely used, non-invasive, quantitative diagnostic method for measuring bone density [16]. According to the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD), DXA is the recognized tool for skeletal health assessment, measuring BMD and bone mineral content (BMC) [17].
In detail, DXA allows a simple and safe examination to be performed using lower doses of dual X-rays than those of an X-ray or a CT scan; hence, it can be repeated safely over time. With DXA, clinicians can obtain information about BMD (expressed in g/m2) and images of total body, hip, posterior–anterior (PA) lumbar spine (LS) and/or forearm [18].
LS, total hip, femoral neck and/or 1/3 radius BMD values are usually considered for osteoporosis diagnosis and/or management. The decision to use each of them depends on the sex and age of the patient [19]. Based on the standard DXA method, the trabecular bone score (TBS) is an imaging technique that allows one to detect skeletal information additional to the standard BMD results. TBS analysis is performed as a computed evaluation of the pixel grey level in the lumbar spine derived from DXA images [20,21]. In this way, a low TBS indicates degraded bone micro-architecture, and studies have robustly shown that it can predict fractures independently of BMD and other clinical risk factors for fractures [22]. In this vein, the early assessment of bone health in ALS patients, i.e., since disease onset, could prevent osteoporosis-related complications thanks to the early start of anti-osteoporotic medication. In addition, the early diagnosis of osteoporosis allows special medication to be prescribed and a follow-up on nutritional recommendations or advice on how to improve bone mineral density to be offered. In fact, the bone health status plays a key role in multidisciplinary disease management, especially during rehabilitation sessions, where the goal of treatment, in ALS patients, is to prevent further muscle-skeletal damage while also enhancing patients’ life quality. However, currently, there is not enough evidence on the incidence/prevalence of osteoporosis/osteopenia in ALS patients.
Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the bone health status in a sample of ALS inpatients attending neurorehabilitation, using BMD and TBS, which are independent predictors of fragility/pathological fractures.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population

Thirty-nine patients diagnosed with ALS according to the revised El Escorial criteria attending the Neurorobotic and Rare Disease Unit of IRCCS Centro Neurolesi “Bonino-Pulejo” (Messina, Italy) from September 2016 to February 2020 were enrolled in this study. One patient was excluded because of missing data (Figure 2).
Thus, the study population consisted of 38 individuals, 16 males (42%) and 22 females (58%), aged 42–83 years (61.82 ± 11.25).
To be included in the study, patients had to be able to walk unassisted and to be capable of giving written or verbal informed consent. Bedridden or severely affected patients and those with pulmonary and cardiac failure and/or with cognitive and behavioural abnormalities were excluded from the study. Individuals taking specific drugs, i.e., steroids, antiresorptive drugs, parathyroid hormone, thyroid hormone, calcitonin, oestrogen, glucocorticoids, thiazide diuretics, barbiturates, fluoride and antiepileptic drugs, were also excluded because of the potential interference with bone status.
The study was approved by the Local Ethics Committee (IRCCSME 23/16), and the patients gave their informed consent to enter the study, after they were well informed about all the administered diagnostic procedures.

2.2. Procedures

After an accurate medical history (to investigate eating habits, previous vitamin deficiency or mineral metabolism alterations, hormonal abnormalities or sexual hormone supplementation, and familiarity for or previous bone fractures) and neurological examination, all patients underwent electrocardiogram and blood tests, including hemogram, kidney and liver enzymes, serum electrolytes (i.e., calcium, phosphorus, magnesium and sodium), and thyroid and parathyroid hormones, as well as Vitamin D concentration. The latter was measured using an automated electro-chemiluminescence assay (Roche).
To classify patients in terms of osteopenia/osteoporosis, we performed BMD measurements using a DXA fan bean system (low X-ray emission) (Lunar Prodigy Primo—GE Medical Systems). Data collection and diagnostic procedure are summarized in Figure 3.
The registered reports from densitometry measurements were expressed as T-score and Z-score, using the WHO criteria for DXA lumbar and femoral scans. Notably, according to the T-score values of the L1–L4 lumbar spine, patient BMD was delineated as normal (T-score ≥ −1 SD), low bone mass (osteopenia) (T-score between −1 and −2.5 SD) and osteoporosis (T-score ≤ −2.5 SD).
On the other hand, the Z-score was used to exclude secondary osteoporosis based on the comparison of bone density with other people in the same age group and of the same size and gender. In fact, if the Z-score is excessively high or low, it may point out factors other than age that can affect BMD.
We assessed BMD and BMC in the lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) using a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) machine (Hologic–QDR 4500-W Discovery-A; Hologic Inc., Bedford, MA, USA). Based on the ISCD criteria [20], T-score ≤ −2.5 for the FN or LS defined osteoporosis; T-score between −2.5 and −1.0 identified osteopenia; T-score ≥ −1 indicated normal BMD.
The trabecular bone score (TBS) was an additional evaluation performed while re-analysing the DXA LS (L1–L4) antero-posterior scans using Lunar Prodigy Primo—GE Medical Systems. The TBS was calculated as a medium value of the single-vertebra measurements (L1–L4) and their associations, excluding those affected by fractures, arthrosis and arthritis.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Analyses were performed using the 4.0.5 version of open-source software R(R Foundation for Statistical Computing.R Core Team; Vienna, Austria, 2022). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Target variables (TBS, LS-BMD and FN-BMD) were examined for outliers using the Grubbs tests. Since the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test results showed normal distribution of the target variables, a nonparametric analysis was performed. Continuous variables were expressed as means ± standard deviations, whereas categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages. The X2 test, the Mann–Whitney U test and the Wilcoxon rank sum test were used for comparison when appropriate. Correlations between quantitative variables were computed using Spearman’s coefficient.

3. Results

All patients completed the study but one (excluded for missing data) without side effects. They presented a nearly normal blood profile (but low vit D levels of 20 ± 9), and no significant gender differences emerged in either clinical scores or demographic variables, as shown in Table 1.
According to the TBS values, patients were subdivided into three categories: NM-TBS (normal micro-architecture) when TBS ≥ 1350; PDM-TBS (partially degraded micro-architecture) when 1200 ≤ TBS < 1350; FDM-TBS (fully degraded micro-architecture) when TBS < 1200. The study sample included 13 (34.2%) patients with NM-TBS, 12 (31.6%) patients with PDM-TBS and 13 (34.2%) patients with FDM-TBS. Patients with FDM-TBS had lower mean age than those with NM-TBS or PDM-TBS, and patients in the LS-BMD and FN-BMD groups presented lower scores than the FDM-TBS group. However, no significant differences among these three groups were found (Table 2).
However, we found that the femoral neck BMD values were significantly lower than lumbar spine BMD in all three classes (p < 0.01 for each comparison).
The BMD values (g/cm2) of the LS (L1–L4) were used to classify patients in the categories of normal (T-score > −1 SD), with osteopenia (−1 SD ≥ T-score > −2.5 SD) and with osteoporosis (T-score ≤ −2.5 SD). The comparisons between TBS and BMD are shown in Table 3 and Table 4, i.e., for lumbar spine and femoral neck, respectively.
Patients with osteoporosis had a lower TBS than those with osteopenia or normal patients, both in lumbar spine and femoral neck, although no statistical significance was reached. The mean age was quite similar in each group, but in the osteoporosis one, there were more females subjects over 50, which could have played a crucial role in the diagnostic procedures. Spearman’s correlation coefficient indicated a moderate correlation between TBS and LS-BMD (r = −0.34) and a mild correlation between TBS and FN-BMD (r = −0.28), i.e., the decrease in TBS was related to the increase in the BMD value. Moreover, a statistical correlation between 25-hydroxy vitamin D values and FN-BMD scores (r = 0.30) was also found.

4. Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the few studies that evaluated the presence of bone fragility and susceptibility to fractures in ALS patients, using BMD and TBS methods. In fact, BMD is globally used as a valid technique to evaluate fracture risk; however, it is inexact in explaining why a person’s bones fracture and others’ do not. On the other hand, the TBS allows one to define individuals whose BMD is above the osteoporotic range as persons at higher risk of fractures [23]. More in detail, nearly normal or osteopenic bone (therefore, with a low risk of pathological fractures) may hide qualitative alterations in the trabecular structure (assessed only using the TBS), with a higher risk of fractures. Then, the TBS may be considered a complementary and useful tool to better assess such a risk profile.
In this cross-sectional study, we found that the poor bone health detected using the TBS could have been a consequence of age and changes in disease and could also have been related to the lifestyle (i.e., malnutrition, physical inactivity and lack of sun exposure) and to multisystem disease progression. In particular, we noticed that there was a correlation between lower TBSs and increased lumbar spine BMD, suggesting that trabecular bone thickness is associated with increased risk of fractures, despite the BMD results, as confirmed by other authors [24,25]. Moreover, low levels of physical activity or immobility can lead to cardiovascular deconditioning and muscle weakness, further contributing to reduced bone health status and strength of tendons and ligaments, which are also caused by the disease itself [26]. Notably, the muscular and bone systems in ALS patients could affect each other due to the lack of bone shape regulation induced by healthy muscles, which may alter bone morphology; such alteration, conversely, could worsen muscle degeneration and disease progression [15,27]. Among others, irisin seems to play a pivotal role, since it is secreted under the regulation of exercise and mediates the intercommunications between exercise and organs. In particular, it helps to reduce the body mass index by transforming white fat into brown and improves bone health by increasing the thickness of cortical bone [28]. As a limitation, we did not evaluate this important marker in our work. Future studies should investigate the role of irisin in ALS patients and also assess whether and to which extent its production (which should be reduced, given the muscle loss in the disease) may influence the bone health of this patient population. However, Lunetta, C., et al. [29] pointed out that circulating irisin in ALS patients is upregulated compared with healthy controls, suggesting a possible role of this myokine in the altered metabolic status due to the disease.
Moreover, our results revealed a positive correlation between Vitamin D and BMD. This link is almost under investigation, and there is no consensus on it. Some studies [30,31] have suggested that there is a direct relationship between low levels of serum vitamin D and low BMD and that it is associated with a worse prognosis. It is known that vitamin D, beside its fundamental role in favouring calcium absorption in bone, is involved in neuroprotection, in the modulation of neuroinflammation and in potentiating the effects of glia- and brain-derived neurotrophic growth factors [32]. In this scenario, ALS disease is related to nutritional issues due to feeding and swallowing problems, and reduced ingestion and intestinal absorption of the right vitamin D contribution, in addition to limited sun exposure, thus further contributing to increased risk of bone fragility and fractures [33,34]. However, Libonati et al. [35] showed that vitamin D supplementation did not have a significant effect on disease progression, explaining that this discrepancy is likely linked to inadequate physical activity due to ALS, and despite vitamin D supplementation, patients did not obtain those benefits observed in the physically active control group.
With this in mind, how do we face BMD and BMC alterations in ALS? Do they play a functional role in prognosis? Considering that ALS clinical management implies a huge economic and social impact, although muscle impairment represents the main determinant, bone damage could play a role in functional prognosis and consequently in the level of quality of life [36]. To date, there is a growing body of evidence [37,38] indicating that the TBS is particularly useful as a complementary technique to BMD for fracture risk assessment in conditions associated with increased fracture risk. On such a basis, we propose to use the TBS in association with DXA scans to monitor bone health and to initiate early treatment with vitamin D supplementation in those who are deficient [39]. In fact, the TBS could be used retrospectively on DXA scans of patients to monitor bone status and to guide possible pharmacological approaches.
Furthermore, this bone assessment could be particularly important in patients undergoing rehabilitation, where the risk of pathological fractures is higher because of the intensive training. In fact, growing evidence suggests that innovation technology, with regards to robotics, may potentiate functional outcomes in patients with neurological disorders [40]. In the last few years, attention has also been paid to the rehabilitation of neurodegenerative diseases, including ALS. Indeed, it has been suggested that a strictly monitored exercise program might significantly reduce motor deterioration in such patients, given that moderate-intensity exercise is beneficial to decreasing the deconditioning and muscle atrophy that can result from progressive inactivity. In this venue, the use of robotic devices, especially for gait impairment, is of potential benefit also in ALS individuals [41]. Promising results are also coming from studies on upper-limb robotic devices, as functional improvement has also been demonstrated [42]. Nonetheless, most of the robotic devices used to potentiate both upper- and lower-limb functions are exoskeletons, which exert high forces and friction on the joints with a higher risk of fractures, especially in patients with osteopenia/osteoporosis. Preventing and/or treating this bone pathology is, therefore, mandatory in all patients at risk of pathological fractures, including those with ALS, before training them with robotics [43]. Given that the TBS may detect those qualitative alterations that are not detectable by only using BMD, the tool should be used to better define pathological risk fractures in neurological patients receiving robotics-based assistance.
Finally, robotic training, especially if performed from the early stage of the disease, may balance the lack of physical activity in such patients, possibly even improving bone health [44]. Therefore, investigating the bone health status as part of the multidisciplinary rehabilitation approach is recommended, especially in the early stage of the disease, to start the right therapeutic choice for limiting BMD loss. To this end, future studies could compare more easy-to-use and non-invasive approaches, such as calcaneal quantitative ultrasound (QUS), to BMD/TBS in order to facilitate osteopenia/osteoporosis early diagnosis in the neurorehabilitation setting.
This study had some limitations to be acknowledged. First, the statistical significance of our results may have been influenced by the fact that significant changes in BMD may take time to manifest, which could represent a bias in our study, since ALS is a rapidly progressive condition. A prolonged follow-up should be recommended, consistent with the evolution of the disease. Moreover, the role of rehabilitation and its effects on bone health were not investigated, nor was the dosage of irisin levels, which could have given more strength to our data.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this study confirmed the hypothesis that ALS patients may exhibit deteriorated bone health with lower bone density and focused on the possible role of the TBS in the multidisciplinary approach to ALS. Indeed, especially in the case of patients receiving robotic rehabilitation training, advances in techniques are required to achieve the early diagnosis of bone health deterioration and thus apply a multidisciplinary treatment strategy (pharmacological, clinical, nutritional, rehabilitative, etc.) with the aim of preventing fractures and improving patients’ quality of life.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.M., S.P. and R.S.C.; methodology, E.M., D.L. and M.C.D.C.; software, M.C.D.C.; validation, all authors; formal analysis, M.C.D.C.; investigation, S.P. and E.M.; resources, A.Q.; data curation, M.C.D.C. and R.D.L.; writing—original draft preparation, E.M., S.P. and R.S.C.; writing—review and editing, R.S.C., S.P. and M.B.; visualisation, all authors; supervision, R.S.C.; project administration, E.M. and A.Q.; funding acquisition, A.Q. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Funding was provided by the Italian Ministry of Health—Current Research 2022. This funding does not have an alphanumeric identification code.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the Local Ethics Committee (IRCCSME 23/16).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be available on demand from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Roos, P.M. Osteoporosis in neurodegeneration. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2014, 28, 418–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Liang, B.; Burley, G.; Lin, S.; Shi, Y.C. Osteoporosis pathogenesis and treatment: Existing and emerging avenues. Cell Mol. Biol. Lett. 2022, 27, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Salari, N.; Darvishi, N.; Bartina, Y.; Larti, M.; Kiaei, A.; Hemmati, M.; Shohaimi, S.; Mohammadi, M. Global prevalence of osteoporosis among the world older adults: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2021, 16, 669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Karlamangla, A.S.; Burnett-Bowie, S.M.; Crandall, C.J. Bone Health During the Menopause Transition and Beyond. Obstet. Gynecol. Clin. 2018, 45, 695–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kelly, R.R.; Sidles, S.J.; LaRue, A.C. Effects of Neurological Disorders on Bone Health. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 612366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Siddiqui, J.A.; Partridge, N.C. Physiological Bone Remodelling: Systemic Regulation and Growth Factor Involvement. Physiology 2016, 31, 233–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Grad, L.I.; Rouleau, G.A.; Ravits, J.; Cashman, N.R. Clinical Spectrum of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS). Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2017, 7, a024117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sooragonda, B.G.; Agarwal, S.; Benjamin, R.N.; Prabhakar, A.T.; Sivadasan, A.; Kapoor, N.; Cherian, K.E.; Jebasingh, F.K.; Aaron, S.; Thomas, N.; et al. Bone Mineral Density and Body Composition in Males with Motor Neuron Disease: A Study from Teaching Hospital in Southern Part of India. Ann. Indian Acad. Neurol. 2021, 24, 211–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Caplliure-Llopis, J.; Escrivá, D.; Benlloch, M.; de la Rubia Ortí, J.E.; Estrela, J.M.; Barrios, C. Poor Bone Quality in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Front. Neurol. 2020, 11, 599216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Peters, T.L.; Weibull, C.E.; Fang, F.; Sandler, D.P.; Lambert, P.C.; Ye, W.; Kamel, F. Association of fractures with the incidence of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. Front. Degener. 2017, 18, 419–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Joyce, N.C.; Hache, L.P.; Clemens, P.R. Bone health and associated metabolic complications in neuromuscular diseases. Phys. Med. Rehabil. Clin. N. Am. 2012, 23, 773–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Patten, B.M.; Mallette, L.E. Motor neuron disease: Retrospective study of associated abnormalities. Dis. Nerv. Syst. 1976, 37, 318–321. [Google Scholar]
  13. Dupuis, L.; Pradat, P.F.; Ludolph, A.C.; Loeffler, J.P. Energy metabolism in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Lancet Neurol. 2011, 10, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Muñoz-Garach, A.; García-Fontana, B.; Muñoz-Torres, M. Nutrients and Dietary Patterns Related to Osteoporosis. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Nair, R.; Maseeh, A. Vitamin D: The “sunshine” vitamin. J. Pharmacol. Pharmacother. 2012, 3, 118–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhou, J.; Yi, J.; Bonewald, L. Muscle-Bone Crosstalk in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Curr. Osteoporos. Rep. 2015, 13, 274–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Iolascon, G.; Paoletta, M.; Liguori, S.; Curci, C.; Moretti, A. Neuromuscular Diseases and Bone. Front. Endocrinol. 2019, 10, 794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Messina, C.; Bignotti, B.; Bazzocchi, A.; Phan, C.M.; Tagliafico, A.; Guglielmi, G.; Sardanelli, F.; Sconfienza, L.M. A critical appraisal of the quality of adult dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry guidelines in osteoporosis using the AGREE II tool: An EuroAIM initiative. Insights Imaging 2017, 8, 311–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Marshall, D.; Johnell, O.; Wedel, H. Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. BMJ 1996, 312, 1254–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shevroja, E.; Cafarelli, F.P.; Guglielmi, G.; Hans, D. DXA parameters, Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) and Bone Mineral Density (BMD), in fracture risk prediction in endocrine-mediated secondary osteoporosis. Endocrine 2021, 74, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pothuaud, L.; Carceller, P.; Hans, D. Correlations between grey-level variations in 2D projection images (TBS) and 3D microarchitecture: Applications in the study of human trabecular bone microarchitecture. Bone 2008, 42, 775–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Silva, B.C.; Leslie, W.D.; Resch, H.; Lamy, O.; Lesnyak, O.; Binkley, N.; McCloskey, E.V.; Kanis, J.A.; Bilezikian, J.P. Trabecular bone score: A noninvasive analytical method based upon the DXA image. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2014, 29, 518–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Palomo, T.; Muszkat, P.; Weiler, F.G.; Dreyer, P.; Brandão, C.M.A.; Silva, B.C. Update on trabecular bone score. Arch. Endocrinol. Metab. 2022, 66, 694–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Writing Group for the ISCD Position Development Conference. Position statement: Executive summary. The writing group for the International society for clinical densitometry (ISCD) position development conference. J. Clin. Densitom. 2004, 7, 7–12. [Google Scholar]
  25. Black, D.M.; Cauley, J.A.; Wagman, R.; Ensrud, K.; Fink, H.A.; Hillier, T.A.; Lui, L.Y.; Cummings, S.R.; Schousboe, J.T.; Napoli, N. The Ability of a Single BMD and Fracture History Assessment to Predict Fracture Over 25 Years in Postmenopausal Women: The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2018, 33, 389–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Rajaei, A.; Amiri, A.; Farsad, F.; Dehghan, P. The Correlation between Trabecular Bone Score and Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density in Patients with Normal and High Body Mass Index. Iran. J. Med. Sci. 2019, 44, 374–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Shevroja, E.; Mo Costabella, F.; Gonzalez Rodriguez, E.; Lamy, O.; Hans, D. The fracture predictive ability of lumbar spine BMD and TBS as calculated based on different combinations of the lumbar spine vertebrae. Arch. Osteoporos. 2022, 17, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Park, D.; Kwak, S.G.; Park, J.S.; Choo, Y.J.; Chang, M.C. Can Therapeutic Exercise Slow Down Progressive Functional Decline in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis? A Meta-Analysis. Front. Neurol. 2020, 11, 853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Manzano, R.; Toivonen, J.M.; Moreno-Martínez, L.; de la Torre, M.; Moreno-García, L.; López-Royo, T.; Molina, N.; Zaragoza, P.; Calvo, A.C.; Osta, R. What skeletal muscle has to say in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Implications for therapy. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2021, 178, 1279–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhao, R. Irisin at the crossroads of inter-organ communications: Challenge and implications. Front. Endocrinol. 2022, 13, 989135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Lunetta, C.; Lizio, A.; Tremolizzo, L.; Ruscica, M.; Macchi, C.; Riva, N.; Weydt, P.; Corradi, E.; Magni, P.; Sansone, V. Serum irisin is upregulated in patients affected by amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and correlates with functional and metabolic status. J. Neurol. 2018, 265, 3001–3008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Roddam, A.W.; Neale, R.; Appleby, P.; Allen, N.E.; Tipper, S.; Key, T.J. Association between Plasma 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Levels and Fracture Risk The EPIC-Oxford Study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2007, 166, 1327–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Karam, C.; Barrett, M.J.; Imperato, T.; MacGowan, D.J.; Scelsa, S. Vitamin D deficiency and its supplementation in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2013, 20, 1550–1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Farghali, M.; Ruga, S.; Morsanuto, V.; Uberti, F. Can Brain Health Be Supported by Vitamin D-Based Supplements? A Critical Review. Brain. Sci. 2020, 10, 660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, M.; Liu, Z.; Sun, W.; Yuan, Y.; Jiao, B.; Zhang, X.; Shen, L.; Jiang, H.; Xia, K.; Tang, B.; et al. Association Between Vitamins and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Center-Based Survey in Mainland China. Front. Neurol. 2020, 11, 488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Suzuki, M.; Yoshioka, M.; Hashimoto, M.; Murakami, M.; Noya, M.; Takahashi, D.; Urashima, M. Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of vitamin D supplementation in Parkinson disease. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2013, 97, 1004–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Libonati, L.; Onesti, E.; Gori, M.C.; Ceccanti, M.; Cambieri, C.; Fabbri, A.; Inghilleri, M. Vitamin D in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Funct. Neurol. 2017, 32, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Harvey, N.C.; Glüer, C.C.; Binkley, N.; McCloskey, E.V.; Brandi, M.L.; Cooper, C.; Kendler, D.; Lamy, O.; Laslop, A.; Camargos, B.M.; et al. Trabecular bone score (TBS) as a new complementary approach for osteoporosis evaluation in clinical practice. Bone 2015, 78, 216–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hans, D.; Šteňová, E.; Lamy, O. The Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) Complements DXA and the FRAX as a Fracture Risk Assessment Tool in Routine Clinical Practice. Curr. Osteoporos. Rep. 2017, 15, 521–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Iandolo, R.; Marini, F.; Semprini, M.; Laffranchi, M.; Mugnosso, M.; Cherif, A.; De Michieli, L.; Chiappalone, M.; Zenzeri, J. Perspectives and Challenges in Robotic Neurorehabilitation. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 3183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Calabrò, R.S.; Cacciola, A.; Bertè, F.; Manuli, A.; Leo, A.; Bramanti, A.; Naro, A.; Milardi, D.; Bramanti, P. Robotic gait rehabilitation and substitution devices in neurological disorders: Where are we now? Neurol. Sci. 2016, 37, 503–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Morioka, H.; Hirayama, T.; Sugisawa, T.; Murata, K.; Shibukawa, M.; Ebina, J.; Sawada, M.; Hanashiro, S.; Nagasawa, J.; Yanagihashi, M.; et al. Robot-assisted training using hybrid assistive limb ameliorates gait ability in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2022, 99, 158–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Portaro, S.; Cimino, V.; Accorinti, M.; Pidalà, A.; Naro, A.; Calabrò, R.S. A promising tool for flail arm in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis rehabilitation: A case report. Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 2019, 55, 515–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Calabrò, R.S.; Portaro, S.; Manuli, A.; Leo, A.; Naro, A.; Bramanti, A. Rethinking the robotic rehabilitation pathway for people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A need for clinical trials. Innov. Clin. Neurosci. 2019, 16, 11–12. [Google Scholar]
Ijerph 20 02923 g001 550
Figure 1. Interconnection among ALS, osteoporosis and its diagnostic procedures.
Figure 1. Interconnection among ALS, osteoporosis and its diagnostic procedures.
Ijerph 20 02923 g001
Ijerph 20 02923 g002 550
Figure 2. Flow chart for patient assessment in cross sectional studies, adapted from CONSORT diagram 2010.
Figure 2. Flow chart for patient assessment in cross sectional studies, adapted from CONSORT diagram 2010.
Ijerph 20 02923 g002
Ijerph 20 02923 g003 550
Figure 3. Data collection and diagnostic intervention process.
Figure 3. Data collection and diagnostic intervention process.
Ijerph 20 02923 g003
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of the patients by gender. Data are expressed as means ± SDs or frequencies (percentages).
Table 1. Characteristics of the patients by gender. Data are expressed as means ± SDs or frequencies (percentages).
Total
(n = 38)		Male
(n = 16)		Female
(n = 22)		p-Value
Age (years)61.82 ± 11.2564.31 ± 12.9160.00 ± 9.770.293
Over 5031 (81.58)14 (87.50)17 (77.27)0.705
Menopausal19 (50.0)-19 (86.4)-
TBS1283.7 ± 151.31313.4 ± 176.6 1262.1 ± 130.00.487
LS-BMD1.06 ± 0.21 1.09 ± 0.231.03 ± 0.19 0.544
FN-BMD0.76 ± 0.180.80 ±0.180.73 ± 0.170.214
Legend: TBS = trabecular bone score; L-BMD = lumbar spine bone mineral density; FN-BMD = femoral neck bone mineral density.
Table
Table 2. Characteristics of the patients by TBS category. Data are expressed as means ± SDs or frequencies (percentages).
Table 2. Characteristics of the patients by TBS category. Data are expressed as means ± SDs or frequencies (percentages).
FDM-TBS
(n = 13)		PDM-TBS
(n = 12)		NM-TBS
(n = 13)		p-Value
Age (years)59.46 ± 11.6365.17 ± 10.0561.08 ± 12.010.307
Over 5010 (76.92)10 (83.33)11 (84.61)0.864
Female8 (61.54)8 (66.67)6 (46.15)0.553
LS-BMD1.13 ± 0.221.03 ± 0.231.01 ± 0.820.241
FN-BMD0.82 ± 0.210.74 ±0.160.71 ± 0.150.333
Legend: FDM-TBS = fully degraded micro-architecture; PDM-TBS = partially degraded micro-architecture; NM-TBS = normal micro-architecture; LS-BMD = lumbar spine bone mineral density; FN-BMD = femoral neck bone mineral density.
Table
Table 3. Characteristics of the patients by LS-BMD classification. Data are expressed as means ± SDs or frequencies (percentages).
Table 3. Characteristics of the patients by LS-BMD classification. Data are expressed as means ± SDs or frequencies (percentages).
Osteoporosis
(n = 11)		Osteopenia
(n = 11)		Normal
(n = 16)		p-Value
Age (years)62.54 ± 12.1862.09 ± 13.4961.12 ± 9.520.694
Over 509 (81.82)8 (72.73)14 (87.50)0.623
Female8 (72.73)6 (54.54)8 (50.00)0.484
TBS1270.3 ± 160.71298.5 ± 166.71282.7 ± 142.90.163
Legend: TBS = trabecular bone score; LS-BMD = lumbar spine bone mineral density.
Table
Table 4. Characteristics of the patients by FN-BMD classification. Data are expressed as means ± SDs or frequencies (percentages).
Table 4. Characteristics of the patients by FN-BMD classification. Data are expressed as means ± SDs or frequencies (percentages).
Osteoporosis
(n = 18)		Osteopenia
(n = 12)		Normal
(n = 8)		p-Value
Age (years)61.44 ± 11.7361.67 ± 13.1562.87 ± 7.830.536
Over 5014 (77.78)9 (75.00)8 (100.00)0.313
Female10 (55.56)7 (58.33)5 (62.50)0.946
TBS1268.8 ± 151.31353.7 ± 171.71329.2 ± 107.80.242
Legend: TBS = trabecular bone score; FN-BMD = femoral neck bone mineral density. p < 0.05.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Morini, E.; Portaro, S.; Leonetti, D.; De Cola, M.C.; De Luca, R.; Bonanno, M.; Quartarone, A.; Calabrò, R.S. Bone Health Status in Individuals with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Cross-Sectional Study on the Role of the Trabecular Bone Score and Its Implications in Neurorehabilitation. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 2923. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20042923

AMA Style

Morini E, Portaro S, Leonetti D, De Cola MC, De Luca R, Bonanno M, Quartarone A, Calabrò RS. Bone Health Status in Individuals with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Cross-Sectional Study on the Role of the Trabecular Bone Score and Its Implications in Neurorehabilitation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023; 20(4):2923. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20042923

Chicago/Turabian Style

Morini, Elisabetta, Simona Portaro, Danilo Leonetti, Maria Cristina De Cola, Rosaria De Luca, Mirjam Bonanno, Angelo Quartarone, and Rocco Salvatore Calabrò. 2023. "Bone Health Status in Individuals with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Cross-Sectional Study on the Role of the Trabecular Bone Score and Its Implications in Neurorehabilitation" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, no. 4: 2923. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20042923

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop