Next Article in Journal
Motivating Individuals to Take Responsible Ocean Action: The Mediatory Effects of Attitude toward the Ocean
Previous Article in Journal
Increased Substance Use among Nurses during the COVID-19 Pandemic
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 20
Issue 3
10.3390/ijerph20032675
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Factors Associated with Telehealth Utilization among Older African Americans in South Los Angeles during the COVID-19 Pandemic

by
Tavonia Ekwegh
1,
Sharon Cobb
1,
Edward K. Adinkrah
2,
Roberto Vargas
3,
Lucy W. Kibe
4,
Humberto Sanchez
5,
Joe Waller
5,
Hoorolnesa Ameli
6 and
Mohsen Bazargan
2,7,*
1
Mervyn M. Dymally School of Nursing (MMDSON), Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science (CDU), Los Angeles, CA 90059, USA
2
Department of Family Medicine, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science (CDU), Los Angeles, CA 90059, USA
3
Department of Internal Medicine, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science (CDU), Los Angeles, CA 90059, USA
4
Physician Assistant Program, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science (CDU), Los Angeles, CA 90059, USA
5
Office of Research, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science (CDU), Los Angeles, CA 90059, USA
6
Department of Emergency Medicine, Mellie’s Bank Hospital, Tehran 1135933763, Iran
7
Department of Family Medicine, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA 90059, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(3), 2675; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032675
Submission received: 23 December 2022 / Revised: 23 January 2023 / Accepted: 28 January 2023 / Published: 2 February 2023
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic transformed healthcare delivery with the expansive use of telemedicine. However, health disparities may result from lower adoption of telehealth among African Americans. This study examined how under-resourced, older African Americans with chronic illnesses use telehealth, including related sociodemographic and COVID-19 factors. Methods: Using a cross-sectional design, 150 middle-aged and older African Americans were recruited from faith-based centers from March 2021 to August 2022. Data collected included sociodemographics, comorbidities, technological device ownership, internet usage, and attitudes toward COVID-19 disease and vaccination. Descriptive statistics and multivariable regression models were conducted to identify factors associated with telehealth use. Results: Of the 150 participants, 32% had not used telehealth since the COVID-19 pandemic, with 75% reporting no home internet access and 38% having no cellular/internet network on their mobile device. Age, access to a cellular network on a mobile device, and wireless internet at home were significantly associated with the utilization of telehealth care. Higher anxiety and stress with an increased perceived threat of COVID-19 and positive attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination were associated with telehealth utilization. Discussion: Access and integration of telehealth services were highlighted as challenges for this population of African Americans. To reduce disparities, expansion of subsidized wireless internet access in marginalized communities is necessitated. Education outreach and training by healthcare systems and community health workers to improve uptake of telehealth currently and post-COVID-19 should be considered.

1. Background

Due to the global spread of COVID-19, most healthcare clinics, facilities, and independent providers were forced to cease all in-person contact with patients, which meant cancellation of wellness visits, health screenings, elective surgeries, and other forms of care. The U.S. healthcare system had to radically shift its primary form of delivery to ensure that optimal care was given and COVID-19 prevention practices were adhered to, prompting the embrace of telehealth. Federal and state policies for Medicaid and Medicare were introduced to allow greater use of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic, which aimed to reduce exposure and transmission of the virus for both patients and providers [1,2]. In response to the exceptional need for remote medical monitoring and consultations during the COVID-19 crisis, telehealth experienced explosive growth in its utilization among healthcare institutions and providers. Even with the improvement in telehealth offerings and increase in usage, gaps in access and use still exist [3,4]. Several studies have shown that access to telehealth was not equitable across different population subgroups [5,6,7,8,9]. Moreover, a recent systematic review of published studies revealed that there are looming disparities in telehealth use by race, age, income, and other factors such as telehealth literacy, access to an electronic digital device, and internet connectivity [1].
Knowing that the vast majority of victims of COVID-19 were older adults and individuals with underlying chronic conditions [10,11], promoting beneficial use of telehealth among these two populations should remain a major focus of telehealth utilization research. The utilization of telehealth services among older adults also substantially increased during the outbreak [12]. Yet, older adults may face a lack of knowledge concerning their access and a lack of knowledge of digital technology, resulting in multiple disadvantages [13,14,15]. Pre-pandemic and current healthcare utilization data show disparities in telehealth use by race and ethnicity among older adults [13,16]. Lower rates of technology usage among older minority adults and lower socioeconomic groups have been extensively established, attributing to a digital divide among these groups [17]. Greater emphasis should center on telehealth usage among minority middle-aged and older adults, as they have a higher prevalence of chronic medical conditions, including hypertension, congestive heart failure, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma, and obesity, which are all risk factors for poor COVID-19 outcomes [18,19,20]. An examination of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System dataset from January 1999 through December 2018 showed extensive disparities among middle-aged and older African American adults and White adults, with regard to increased rates of diabetes, hypertension, and asthma [21].
Recent studies highlight the importance of telehealth in increasing access to care and promoting health equity for underserved and under-resourced populations [22]. However, the rapid adoption of telehealth may exacerbate existing inequities for African Americans, as individuals with lower incomes and older in age face more challenges when attempting to use telehealth services [17]. Healthcare access and quality are identified as major contributing factors to the increased COVID-19 burden among older African Americans [23]. Delay in care and poor access to specialized care during the pandemic was associated with an increase in severely uncontrolled chronic diseases, such as diabetes, particularly in vulnerable populations [24]. Yet, little knowledge exists about the health care usage or interruption in care during the COVID-19 pandemic among older African Americans [25,26,27,28]. It is in this context that addressing factors that caused a telehealth avoidance in accessing healthcare among middle-aged and older African Americans with multiple chronic diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic remains a major public health concern [29]. Indeed, interventional studies are urgently needed to promote appropriate use of telehealth among middle-aged and older African Americans with multiple chronic diseases [30,31,32,33].

Aims

In response to the increased need for designing effective interventional strategies to promote appropriate telehealth utilization among African Americans, this study examined the frequency and correlates of telehealth utilization since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic among a sample of underserved African Americans aged 55 years and older residing in the South Los Angeles, California.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Design and Setting

This cross-sectional study was conducted in faith-based organizations (i.e., churches) in South Los Angeles. Eligibility was based on African American ethnicity, age 55 or more, and the presence of at least one chronic condition. Data was collected between March 2021 and August 2022. This research is a part of a larger study designed to assess the impact of a community-based, participatory, faith-based, multidisciplinary, theoretical-based intervention to reduce the risk of COVID-19 and enhance chronic care management among underserved middle-aged and older African American adults. Within the geographic area of South Los Angeles, African Americans constitute nearly 30% of the over 1 million residents [34].

2.2. Institutional Review Board (IRB)

The study protocol was approved by the IRB of the Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science (CDU), Los Angeles (IRB#: 1663247-1). All participants signed a written informed consent before being enrolled in this study. Participants received financial compensation.

2.3. Recruitment and Sampling

Non-random sampling was used for recruitment. A total number of 150 individuals were enrolled. All participants provided signed consent. The Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science approved the study.

2.4. Measurement

2.4.1. Demographics Characteristics

Various factors were assessed, including age, gender, educational attainment, and marital status as covariates. Educational attainment was operationalized as a continuous variable (number of years for school attendance). Higher scores indicated more years of education. In addition, we asked our participants whether they were married or lived with a partner, which was analyzed categorically as either married/lived with a partner or not married/did not live with a partner.

2.4.2. Financial Strain

This variable was measured using four items. Participants were asked, “In the past 12 months, how frequently were you unable to: (1) buy the amount of food your family should have, (2) buy the clothes you feel your family should have, (3) pay your rent or mortgage, and (4) pay your monthly bills”. Items were on a five-level response scale ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (always). A total “financial strain” score was calculated, with an average score of four items, ranging from 1 to 5. A high score was indicative of greater financial difficulty. These items are consistent with Pearlin’s list of low SES individuals’ chronic financial difficulties (Cronbach alpha = 0.92) [35].

2.4.3. Number of Major Chronic Diseases

We asked participants to report whether they had been diagnosed with the following diseases: hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, COPD or asthma, and kidney disease. This variable had a potential range of 0 to 5, with a higher number indicating multi-morbidity.

2.4.4. COVID-Related Constructs

We asked participants about COVID-19 vaccination history, COVID-19 diagnosis history, COVID-19 perceived threat, and COVID-19 knowledge, using multiple items borrowed from the PhenX COVID-19 library (https://www.phenxtoolkit.org/, accessed on 11 March 2021). The PhenX (consensus measures for Phenotypes and eXposures) Toolkit is a publicly available, web-based catalog of recommended, well-established measurement protocols of phenotypes and exposures [36,37].

2.4.5. Attitudes toward COVID-19 Vaccination

This variable was measured using 10 items adopted from the Sage Vaccine Hesitancy Report. Participants were asked to report whether they strongly disagree, disagree, neither disagree nor agree, agree, or strongly agree with statements that were indicative of their attitudes toward the COVID-19 vaccination. Depending on their perception of telemedicine, these attitudes may be either positive if they agree with COVID-19 vaccination or negative if participants disagree with it. A total score was calculated, with an average score of 10 items, ranging from 1: very negative to 5: very positive.

2.4.6. Perceived Threat of Infection (Risk) of COVID-19

This variable was measured using five items adopted from the Social Psychological Measurement of COVID-19 (Rad-X). Using a scale of 0 to 7, participants were asked to report: (1) thinking about the coronavirus (COVID-19) makes me feel threatened; (2) I am afraid of the coronavirus (COVID-19); (3) I am worried that I or people I love will get sick from the coronavirus (COVID-19); (4) I am stressed around other people because I worry I will catch the coronavirus (COVID-19); and (5) I have tried hard to avoid other people because I do not want to get sick. A total “Perceived Threat” score was calculated, with an average score of five items ranging from 0 to 7. A high score was indicative of a greater perceived threat of infection.

2.4.7. Knowledge of COVID-19

Twenty-one items that were publicized by Rad-X were used to assess the level of COVID-19 related knowledge of participants. Participants were asked to identify the symptoms of COVID-19, how the virus is spread, as well as how people can protect themselves from getting infected. A total score was calculated, with an average score of 21 items (true or false), ranging from 1 to 2. A high score was indicative of greater COVID-19 knowledge.

2.4.8. Telehealth-Related Utilization

We used six items to capture telehealth-related medical care utilization. Participants were asked to report: (1–3) Have you participated in telehealth visits since the coronavirus pandemic? If yes, did you use the telephone or video for a visit(s); (4) do you ever go on-line to access the internet or to send and receive email; (5) when you use the internet, do you access it through a cellular network on your phone, a wireless network–Wi-Fi–at home, etc.; (6) how often do you access the internet (using a regular dial-up telephone, do you ever go online).

2.5. Data Analysis

Our analysis had three parts. The first section was a descriptive analysis of all participants. This descriptive work reported means and standard deviation for continuous measures and frequency and percentages for the categorical variables. Next, Pearson correlation was utilized to examine the bivariate association between all study variables, including socio-demographics, COVID-19-related measures, health, and the outcome variable (telehealth use since COVID-19). For the multivariable analysis, binary logistic regressions were run to examine the independent association of telehealth care utilization and all our exploratory variables. Both categorical and continuous independent variables are included in the model, regardless of the bivariate analysis results. For Binary Logistic Regression, Exp (B) the exponentiation of the B coefficient, which is an odds ratio and a 95% confidence interval, are reported. For the multivariate analysis, p values of less than 0.05 were considered significant.

3. Results

3.1. Descriptive Analysis

Table 1 reports the characteristics of the study sample. This study included 150 African American individuals who were between the ages of 55 and 91 years (mean = 68.5 ± 8.66). Approximately 32% of participants were 75 years of age or older, with only 39% self-reporting as being married. Thirteen percent of participants never completed high school, and another 27% reported completing high school. Regarding health status, we noted the following health diseases/illnesses: hypertension (56%), diabetes mellitus (22%), COPD or asthma (22%), and cardiovascular-related diseases (11%). Over half of our participants (57%) rated their mental health as very good or excellent. Only thirty percent (30%) of participants self-reported their physical health as very good or excellent. Almost 28% reported their oral health as poor or fair.
Nearly one-third of participants (32%) had not used telehealth since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic (Table 1). Only 19% and 49% of participants used video calls and telephone calls, respectively. Over 40% of participants who used video telehealth indicated that someone assisted them in joining the video call. However, both sub-groups indicated that they need additional technical support to ensure that future telehealth visits are effective. In addition, 30% of telehealth users were concerned that their provider could not physically examine them during telehealth. Additionally, 20% admitted that their medical questions or issues were not addressed (Table 1).
At least two-thirds (66%) of telehealth users reported that the various parts of their telehealth visit (scheduling, the patient portal, video/phone specifications) were not well integrated. However, 73% of them expressed that they were satisfied (29%) or very satisfied (44%) with their most recent experiences with their telehealth visits. Furthermore, 62% felt that telehealth is a convenient form of healthcare delivery for them, with 56% having a stronger preference for telehealth compared to an in-person visit. Finally, when participants were asked, “what would make your experience with telehealth better?”, almost one-third (31%) pointed to having better access to high-speed/quality data plans, internet services, and technical support.
Technological access differed, with 40% reporting daily access to a computer compared to 19% only having access occasionally. Additionally, 41% indicated that they never go online to access the internet or to send and receive digital media or emails. Regarding wireless connectivity, 25% indicated that they have no internet at home, and 38% had no cellular network on their cellphone.

3.2. Bivariate Analysis

Table 2 shows bivariate correlations between telehealth utilization and other study variables. Findings revealed that age, gender, and education were not correlated with telehealth utilization. However, a number of chronic diseases (r = 0.252; p < 0.001), perceived risk of COVID-19 (r = 0.166; p < 0.05), and attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination (r = 0.282; p < 0.001) were associated with telehealth utilization. In addition, having internet at home (r = 0.236; p < 0.001) and a cellular network (r = 0.207; p < 0.005) were significantly associated with telehealth utilization.

3.3. Multivariable Analysis

Table 3 presents the summary of the multivariable analysis using Poisson log-linear regression. According to this table, controlling for all other variables, older age (OR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.03–1.23) and not being enrolled in Medicare (OR: 0.19; 95% CI: 0.05–0.67) were associated with higher utilization of telehealth. In addition, having the internet at home (OR: 11.3; 95% CI: 2.81–45.39) and having a cellular network (OR: 4.22; 95% CI: 1.21–14.77) were significantly associated with the utilization of telehealth. Having a positive attitude toward COVID-19 vaccination and a higher level of perceived risk of COVID-19 infection were also associated with telehealth care utilization. However, knowledge of COVID-19 symptoms and protection measures was not associated with telehealth care utilization.

4. Discussion

The findings of this study revealed that increased perceived risk of COVID-19 and positive attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination were associated with telehealth utilization. In a sample of middle-aged and older African Americans with chronic health issues, our results showed participants who were not Medicare beneficiaries, had home internet, possessed a cellular phone, and were chronologically older were more likely to utilize telehealth services. Combined, these findings advance the literature for emphasizing the promising role of relevant culturally sensitive, theory-based telehealth services and interventions as a tool to improve the health status of an under-resourced minority population.
Our findings revealed a significant relationship between older age and higher utilization of telehealth among this under-rescourced population. Elam and colleagues (2022) uncovered that older adults in the US were less likely to have telehealth visits than in-person visits during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic [38]. However, older adults are likely to be interested in participating in a first-time telehealth visit [39], which should prompt healthcare systems to offer more assistance and guidance for telehealth to the older population. Additional multiple lines of data suggest that COVID-19 was a particular threat to older adults with numerous comorbidities [40,41], which may have contributed to their interest in telehealth services. It is important to note that 40% required assistance to join telehealth services, which should prompt providers to ensure that this population has comfort with telehealth services or provide technological assistance. Furthermore, undesired COVID-19 outcomes such as hospitalization are highest among older adults with underlying diseases [25], as COVID-19-related hospitalization and death rates increase with age [25]. Therefore, efforts to engage older adults in telehealth practices may be beneficial to increase their engagement.
This study showed that positive attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination and higher levels of perceived risk of a COVID-19 infection were associated with telehealth care utilization. It has been evidenced that having a greater degree of understanding of COVID-19 was connected with having more favorable views toward preventive actions, such as using a mask and adhering to social distancing measures. Compared to non-Hispanic Whites, African Americans were at an increased risk of experiencing severe COVID-19 outcomes [42,43]. In addition, the increased incidence of severe COVID-19 among African Americans is partly due to higher infection rates, which suggests that COVID-19 disparities most likely result from increased vulnerability [42,43]. Thus, those who may have perceived themselves at risk may have been more likely to communicate with a healthcare provider.
Medical insurers have noted that there was an increase in telehealth billing claims for residential areas that are predominantly African American [2]. Our results supported this claim, with 19% reporting a video call with a provider, compared to 49% who had a telephonic visit with their provider. Our findings show that those who had strong attitudes toward protecting themselves against a COVID-19 infection were more likely to continue with care visits with their provider. However, 30% reported no usage of telehealth. Therefore, it should be a priority that providers continue to assess attitudes toward COVID-19 and other major chronic illnesses, and collective efforts should be made to increase positive messaging about COVID-19 and health status, especially during all telehealth and in-person care visits.
Our results also revealed that having internet at home and having a cellular network were significantly associated with the utilization of telehealth. A recent Pew Research Center report revealed the widening of the national digital divide, as those with lower incomes have lower rates of ownership of a smartphone, home internet, or desktop/laptop/tablet computer, resulting in decreased technological access [44]. In our entire study population, 25% indicated that they have no internet at home, and 38% had no cellular network on their cellphone. One of the major obstacles to the widespread use of telehealth is the influence of socioeconomic status, resulting in lower access to and proficiency with various forms of technology, especially for impoverished populations. Some contributing factors include financial hardship, illiteracy, a lack of enthusiasm or desire, and an absence of necessary resources to make use of available technologies [45,46]. A recent study found that compared to their White counterparts, African Americans were less likely to participate in telehealth and telemedicine visits [8]. The COVID-19 pandemic led to healthcare providers shifting to online and remote modalities for clinical care, as opposed to in-person visits [47].
Additionally, we documented that not being enrolled in Medicare was also associated with telehealth use. Webber and colleagues found that individuals with commercial or private health insurance were likelier to have appropriate technological devices for telehealth use compared to Medicare patients with a prepaid phone or no phone at all [48]. Further studies support our findings that commercial insurance holders utilize telehealth services more frequently than Medicare beneficiaries [49]. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services approved telehealth waivers as a component of the Public Health Emergency framework, which likely increased the utilization of telehealth services by Medicare beneficiaries [50]. Even though the offering of telehealth services among Medicare beneficiaries increased from 18% to 63%, pre-pandemic to November 2020, minorities and older adults had less availability of telehealth equipment. Additional studies reported lower adoption of telehealth services among African American and Latino Medicare beneficiaries [51].
Our data also showed a relationship between the total number of diagnosed chronic diseases and telehealth utilization at the bivariate level. With only 30% of the study population rating their physical health as very good or excellent, participants may have sought medical care via telehealth methods for their chronic health issues and quality of medical life. Ng and Park (2021) found that individuals with multiple comorbidities were likely to have telehealth services offered by their primary care provider compared to an in-person visit [52]. Supporting evidence has confirmed our findings that individuals with an increasing number of comorbidities are likely to be offered and use telehealth services [53]. Moreover, telehealth interventions have benefited African Americans for various diseases, including diabetes and glycemic control [54], gastrointestinal diseases [55], and anxiety and depression [56]. Social isolation, combined with other risk factors such as depression, may contribute to worsening disease management for these individuals with chronic diseases [40]. Due to the consistent messaging of practicing social distancing, an increase in telehealth utilization and treatments may be forecasted as a preferred method for the management of chronic diseases. However, those with multiple comorbidities and psychosocial needs may struggle to engage in telehealth visits and face difficulty navigating services [57]. It is crucial to study the effectiveness of treatments to know which chronic diseases may be managed remotely and which need personal contact.
It is important to highlight that over two-thirds of the study population believed that the processes of scheduling and participating in a telehealth visit were not well integrated. A study that explored telehealth perspectives among under-resourced communities in the South Los Angeles area found that African Americans were more concerned regarding the lack of privacy and confidentiality and the physical absence of the provider, compared to Latinos [58]. This may contribute to our finding of 20% reporting that their questions were not answered during telehealth visits. Wegerman and colleagues (2021) propose that healthcare systems must assess and ensure that there is full support for telehealth with both internal and external partners prior to implementation for integration ease [59]. Various healthcare providers, including physicians and nurses, have exposed telehealth disparities in areas such as access to care, bandwidth connectivity, availability of devices to perform telehealth, and socioeconomic and language barriers [60]. Moreover, they discuss that smartphone interfaces and funding for patient advocacy is essential for the success of telehealth.

4.1. Implications for Programs, Practice, and Research

These findings have significant implications for issues such as the introduction of telehealth, patient satisfaction, and the interaction between healthcare practitioners and patients. In addition, telehealth can benefit under-resourced populations, including those experiencing transportation challenges or other socioeconomic disparities. Meeting the needs of African American older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic may show innovation that can be translational for local governments and traditional safety net providers within the social work milieu [61]. Moreover, access can be increased for these populations to have health encounters with providers of different specialties, as waiting times are likely to decrease.
To increase health equity, health systems and providers must develop and continuously improve infrastructure for greater access and availability of telehealth for all individuals, which includes compatibility of various technological devices for audio and video visits. With the increased usage of telehealth, many providers could maintain their clinical priorities while maintaining social distance from their patients during the height of the pandemic. As projected, telehealth will continue to rise significantly following the COVID-19 pandemic, necessitating expanded access and accessibility, especially for under-resourced minorities. Additionally, these telehealth visits should incorporate a multidisciplinary approach, in which various providers can meet with the patient in a single visit, such as the physician, pharmacist, and social worker.
Healthcare policies centered on incentivizing telehealth adoption for providers and patients should address the inequalities in mobile technology among under-resourced minorities. Technological devices owned by lower-income individuals, such as prepaid cellphones, may have fewer features and poorer capability to access telehealth components, such as video call visits or reviewing their online health records. Moreover, these populations may reside in communities with environmental and structural inequalities, with little or no wireless internet services, also known as “WiFi deserts”, primarily required for technological device use. Future policies should increase internet access, broad infrastructure, and available intelligent devices that will economically and technologically benefit under-resourced populations.
When establishing strategies to promote and implement telehealth in urban, underserved African American populations, it will be crucial to examine their attitudes and receptiveness toward the healthcare innovation of telehealth. The COVID-19 pandemic catalyzed fundamental shifts in healthcare delivery, leading to rapid integration in facilities frequented by marginalized populations and exacerbating health disparities [61]. Therefore, certain population groups, including our population of older African Americans and Latino groups, may have yet to receive in-person guidance on how to use telehealth services, learning on their own during the pandemic. This likely precipitated barriers toward telehealth, including specific patient factors, such as time inconvenience, cognitive or sensory impairment, and lack of perceived benefit. However, this may be compounded by other chronic health issues faced by African American and Latino groups in South Los Angeles, including low back pain [62], poor nutritional status [63], and frequent emergency care utilization [64]. Future research should explore racial or ethnic variations among patients who used various telehealth options during the COVID-19 outbreak. In addition, literature has found that racial/ethnic minorities and older adults are less likely to participate in telehealth [65,66,67,68]. As African American and Latino groups are underrepresented in studies surrounding telehealth, implementing interventions to improve clinical outcomes with telehealth care delivery methods may be effective.
Due to the high vulnerability of this population, the reduction of COVID-19 risk and the management of chronic diseases in older African Americans with a propensity for multiple comorbidities require urgent attention. Our national healthcare system was unprepared with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, which worsened the health status of under-resourced communities. As rates of COVID-19 are decreasing, providers are still managing the long-term effects of COVID-19, coupled with care management of other major chronic diseases. To combat future crises of new infectious diseases, innovative interventions to increase telehealth use among this population is critically warranted. As health-based technological systems and interfaces continue to advance rapidly, certain populations may not gain access to these innovations and instead face worsening health effects. Current telehealth methods, such as emailing/texting providers or sharing results from wearable technology are not utilized by all individuals, increasing disparities. Efforts to increase telehealth utilization among older African Americans with multiple comorbidities in the context of COVID-19 are warranted to improve health access and status.

4.2. Limitations

This study had several limitations. First, this study had a small sample size, which limits our confidence regarding the generalizability of findings, particularly negative associations. A second limitation was the study’s cross-sectional design. All our study variables were measured at an individual level, and we did not collect neighborhood-level data or data from the healthcare system. We also did not measure mistrust in the healthcare system nor any stigma associated with it. Also, this study did not assess the frequency of in-person visits with providers or availability of various types of delivery methods offered by their provider (e.g., in-person, telehealth, home visit). Moreover, we also did not differentiate between different chronic diseases. While we pooled all chronic diseases together, some conditions may correlate differently to telehealth utilization. Additionally, participant enrollment and data collection period lasted from March 2021 to August 2022, which occurred during various waves and surging strains of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the COVID-19 vaccination had been nationally available since the inception of the study, and our study reflects attitudes and behaviors among an under-resourced group who has been negatively impacted overall with severe COVID-19 outcomes. According to the findings of this study, African Americans who live in different regions of the United States of America have varying rates of telehealth utilization in their respective regions. The findings of Adepoju and colleagues (2022) revealed minority groups like African Americans and Hispanics who lived further away from healthcare facilities found telehealth very beneficial [69]. However, our study focused on older African Americans, who reside in one of the under-resourced urban communities in the nation and face multiple other socioeconomic and health disparities [70,71,72,73]. Moreover, the high expense of technology, inadequate internet connectivity, poor accessibility for the impaired, and the prevalence of low-performing gadgets all contribute to a general lack of access to technology.

5. Conclusions

Risk reduction of COVID-19 and chronic disease management for African American older adults with multiple comorbidities are highlighted as difficult challenges due to the high vulnerability of this group, a fact that warrants critical attention [74,75,76,77,78]. Proactive efforts to increase telehealth utilization associated with multiple comorbidities among older African Americans amid COVID-19 are warranted, as they can increase health access. In addition, providers and healthcare systems performing wide-scale implementation of telehealth services should address and resolve barriers faced by under-resourced minority populations. Education outreach and training by healthcare systems and community health workers to improve uptake of telehealth currently and post-COVID-19 should be considered. Finally, to reduce disparities, expansion of subsidized wireless internet access in marginalized communities is necessitated.

Author Contributions

M.B., S.C. and R.V. were involved in the conception, funding acquisition, and design of the study. M.B. and E.K.A. performed the data analysis and interpretation. T.E., S.C., E.K.A. and M.B. together drafted the initial manuscript. In addition, L.W.K., E.K.A., J.W., M.B., H.A. and H.S. were involved in overseeing the study and data collection. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

As scholars of the Clinical Research Education and Career Development (CRECD) program at Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science (CDU), the research efforts of Drs. Adinkrah, Ekwegh, and Cobb were supported by the NIMHD/NIH Award number R25 MD007610 (PI: M. Bazargan). In addition, this study was supported by the National Institute of Minority Health and Health Disparities under award number U54MD007598 (PI: J. Vadgama).

Institutional Review Board Statement

IRB Approval Number [1663247-1]. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Institutional Review Committee of the CDU. Participants provided informed consent. The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the relevant national and institutional committees.

Informed Consent Statement

All adults who participated in this study were given information about the study, including potential risks and benefits. The consent form significantly described the purpose of the study. Ample opportunity was allowed for participants and their family members to ask questions and discuss what it meant. All participants signed the consent forms. Illiterate participants provided consent in the presence of a reliable or legally authorized family member. The consent form explained that those who participated also gave their consent to utilize the information in a non-identified format for scientific and popular publications.

Data Availability Statement

The data sets used and analyzed in the current study are available from the corresponding author for collaborative studies. Personal identification details of the participants were separated from the completed questionnaires. The data were stored in a locked room at the Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science (CDU). No information relating to identifiable individuals was disseminated at all. The data sets used and analyzed in the current study are available from the corresponding author for collaborative studies. Code availability: N/A.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors certify that they have no affiliation with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. There are no conflict and financial interest to declare. No connections, direct or indirect, or other situations that might raise the question of bias in work were reported for any of the authors or for the associated departments or CDU.

References

  1. Harju, A.; Neufeld, J. Telehealth Utilization during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Preliminary Selective Review. Telemed. Rep. 2022, 3, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Friedman, A.B.; Gervasi, S.; Song, H.; Bond, A.M.; Chen, A.T.; Bergman, A.; David, G.; Bailey, J.M.; Brooks, R.; Smith-McLallen, A. Telemedicine catches on: Changes in the utilization of telemedicine services during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am. J. Manag. Care 2022, 28, e1–e6. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Chang, M.-H.; Moonesinghe, R.; Truman, B.I. Telehealth Availability and Usage among Medicare Beneficiaries during the COVID-19 Pandemic, October and November 2020. J. Public Health Manag. Pract. 2022, 28, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. White-Williams, C.; Liu, X.; Shang, D.; Santiago, J. Use of telehealth among racial and ethnic minority groups in the United States before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Health Rep. 2023, 138, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Andersen, J.A.; Felix, H.C.; Su, D.; Selig, J.P.; Ratcliff, S.; McElfish, P.A. Factors Associated with Arkansans’ First Use of Telehealth during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int. J. Telemed. Appl. 2022, 2022, 5953027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Karimi, M.; Lee, E.C.; Couture, S.J.; Gonzales, A.; Grigorescu, V.; Smith, S.R.; De Lew, N.; Sommers, B.D. National Survey Trends in Telehealth Use in 2021: Disparities in Utilization and Audio vs. Video Services; Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary: Washington, DC, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  7. Broffman, L.; Harrison, S.; Zhao, M.; Goldman, A.; Patnaik, I.; Zhou, M. The relationship between broadband speeds, device type, demographic characteristics, and care-seeking via telehealth. Telemed. J. e-Health 2022. ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Adepoju, O.E.; Chae, M.; Ojinnaka, C.O.; Shetty, S.; Angelocci, T. Utilization Gaps During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Telemedicine Uptake in Federally Qualified Health Center Clinics. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2022, 37, 1191–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Friedman, E.E.; Devlin, S.A.; Gilson, S.F.; Ridgway, J.P. Age and Racial Disparities in Telehealth Use among People with HIV during the COVID-19 Pandemic. AIDS Behav. 2022, 26, 2686–2691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ho, F.K.; Petermann-Rocha, F.; Gray, S.R.; Jani, B.D.; Katikireddi, S.V.; Niedzwiedz, C.L.; Foster, H.; Hastie, C.E.; Mackay, D.F.; Gill, J.M. Is older age associated with COVID-19 mortality in the absence of other risk factors? General population cohort study of 470,034 participants. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0241824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Christie, A.; Henley, S.J.; Mattocks, L.; Fernando, R.; Lansky, A.; Ahmad, F.B.; Adjemian, J.; Anderson, R.N.; Binder, A.M.; Carey, K. Decreases in COVID-19 cases, emergency department visits, hospital admissions, and deaths among older adults following the introduction of COVID-19 vaccine—United States, September 6, 2020–May 1, 2021. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2021, 70, 858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Qin, W. Technology Learning and the Adoption of Telehealth among Community-Dwelling Older Adults during the COVID-19 Outbreak. J. Appl. Gerontol. 2022, 41, 1651–1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Choi, N.G.; DiNitto, D.M.; Marti, C.N.; Choi, B.Y. Telehealth use among older adults during COVID-19: Associations with sociodemographic and health characteristics, technology device ownership, and technology learning. J. Appl. Gerontol. 2022, 41, 600–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ng, B.P.; Park, C.; Silverman, C.L.; Eckhoff, D.O.; Guest, J.C.; Díaz, D.A. Accessibility and utilisation of telehealth services among older adults during COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Health Soc. Care Community 2022, 30, e2657–e2669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Nedeljko, A.M.; Bogataj, D.D.; Perović, A.P.D.B.T.; Kaučič, A.P.D.B.M. Digital literacy during the coronavirus pandemic in older adults: Literature Review and Research Agenda. IFAC-Pap. 2022, 55, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Walker, D.M.; Hefner, J.L.; Fareed, N.; Huerta, T.R.; McAlearney, A.S. Exploring the digital divide: Age and race disparities in use of an inpatient portal. Telemed. J. e-Health 2020, 26, 603–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Eberly, L.A.; Kallan, M.J.; Julien, H.M.; Haynes, N.; Khatana, S.A.M.; Nathan, A.S.; Snider, C.; Chokshi, N.P.; Eneanya, N.D.; Takvorian, S.U.; et al. Patient Characteristics Associated with Telemedicine Access for Primary and Specialty Ambulatory Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic. JAMA Netw. Open 2020, 3, e2031640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ward, B.W.; Schiller, J.S. Peer reviewed: Prevalence of multiple chronic conditions among US adults: Estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, 2010. Prev. Chronic Dis. 2013, 10, E65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Quiñones, A.R.; Botoseneanu, A.; Markwardt, S.; Nagel, C.L.; Newsom, J.T.; Dorr, D.A.; Allore, H.G. Racial/ethnic differences in multimorbidity development and chronic disease accumulation for middle-aged adults. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0218462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. St Sauver, J.L.; Boyd, C.M.; Grossardt, B.R.; Bobo, W.V.; Rutten, L.J.F.; Roger, V.L.; Ebbert, J.O.; Therneau, T.M.; Yawn, B.P.; Rocca, W.A. Risk of developing multimorbidity across all ages in an historical cohort study: Differences by sex and ethnicity. BMJ Open 2015, 5, e006413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Odlum, M.; Moise, N.; Kronish, I.M.; Broadwell, P.; Alcántara, C.; Davis, N.J.; Cheung, Y.K.K.; Perotte, A.; Yoon, S. Trends in poor health indicators among black and hispanic middle-aged and older adults in the United States, 1999–2018. JAMA Netw. Open 2020, 3, e2025134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shah, D.A.; Sall, D.; Peng, W.; Sharer, R.; Essary, A.C.; Radhakrishnan, P. Exploring the role of telehealth in providing equitable healthcare to the vulnerable patient population during COVID-19. J. Telemed. Telecare 2022, 1357633X221113711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Garcia, M.A.; Homan, P.A.; García, C.; Brown, T.H. The color of COVID-19: Structural racism and the disproportionate impact of the pandemic on older Black and Latinx adults. J. Gerontol. Ser. B 2021, 76, e75–e80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Nielsen, V.M.; Song, G.; Ojamaa, L.S.; Blodgett, R.P.; Rocchio, C.M.; Pennock, J.N. The COVID-19 pandemic and access to selected ambulatory care services among populations with severely uncontrolled diabetes and hypertension in Massachusetts. Public Health Rep. 2022, 137, 344–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Garg, S.; Kim, L.; Whitaker, M.; O’Halloran, A.; Cummings, C.; Holstein, R.; Prill, M.; Chai, S.J.; Kirley, P.D.; Alden, N.B.; et al. Hospitalization Rates and Characteristics of Patients Hospitalized with Laboratory-Confirmed Coronavirus Disease 2019—COVID-NET, 14 States, March 1–30, 2020. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2020, 69, 458–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kirby, T. Evidence mounts on the disproportionate effect of COVID-19 on ethnic minorities. Lancet Respir. Med. 2020, 8, 547–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nikolich-Zugich, J.; Knox, K.S.; Rios, C.T.; Natt, B.; Bhattacharya, D.; Fain, M.J. SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 in older adults: What we may expect regarding pathogenesis, immune responses, and outcomes. Geroscience 2020, 42, 505–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mude, W.; Oguoma, V.M.; Nyanhanda, T.; Mwanri, L.; Njue, C. Racial disparities in COVID-19 pandemic cases, hospitalisations, and deaths: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Glob. Health 2021, 11, 05015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Peckham, A.; Pituch, K.A.; Maxfield, M.; Guest, M.A.; Sivanandam, S.; Doebbeling, B.N. Aging through the time of COVID-19: A survey of self-reported healthcare access. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2021, 21, 1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Pekmezaris, R.; Kozikowski, A.; Pascarelli, B.; Wolf-Klein, G.; Boye-Codjoe, E.; Jacome, S.; Madera, D.; Tsang, D.; Guerrero, B.; Medina, R. A telehealth-delivered pulmonary rehabilitation intervention in underserved Hispanic and African American patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A community-based participatory research approach. JMIR Form. Res. 2020, 4, e13197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. McCall, T.; Bolton, C.S., III; McCall, R.; Khairat, S. The use of culturally-tailored telehealth interventions in managing anxiety and depression in African American adults: A systematic review. In MEDINFO 2019: Health and Wellbeing e-Networks for All; ISO Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 1728–1729. [Google Scholar]
  32. McCall, T.; Bolton III, C.S.; Carlson, R.; Khairat, S. A systematic review of telehealth interventions for managing anxiety and depression in African American adults. mHealth 2021, 7, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ryskina, K.L.; Shultz, K.; Zhou, Y.; Lautenbach, G.; Brown, R.T. Older adults’ access to primary care: Gender, racial, and ethnic disparities in telemedicine. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2021, 69, 2732–2740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Los Angeles County of Public Health, Office of Health Assessment and Epidemilogy. Key Indicators of Health by Service Planning Area; Los Angeles County of Public Health: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  35. Laaksonen, E.; Lallukka, T.; Lahelma, E.; Ferrie, J.E.; Rahkonen, O.; Head, J.; Marmot, M.G.; Martikainen, P. Economic difficulties and physical functioning in Finnish and British employees: Contribution of social and behavioural factors. Eur. J. Public Health 2011, 21, 456–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Krzyzanowski, M.C.; Terry, I.; Williams, D.; West, P.; Gridley, L.N.; Hamilton, C.M. The PhenX Toolkit: Establishing standard measures for COVID-19 research. Curr. Protoc. 2021, 1, e111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cox, L.A.; Hwang, S.; Haines, J.; Ramos, E.M.; McCarty, C.A.; Marazita, M.L.; Engle, M.L.; Hendershot, T.; Pan, H.; Hamilton, C.M. Using the PhenX Toolkit to Select Standard Measurement Protocols for Your Research Study. Curr. Protoc. 2021, 1, e149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Elam, A.R.; Sidhom, D.; Ugoh, P.; Andrews, C.A.; De Lott, L.B.; Woodward, M.A.; Lee, P.P.; Newman-Casey, P.A. Disparities in Eye Care Utilization During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2022, 233, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Kurlander, J.E.; Kullgren, J.T.; Adams, M.A.; Malani, P.N.; Kirch, M.; Solway, E.; Singer, D.C.; Steppe, E.; Saini, S.D. Interest in and concerns about telehealth among adults aged 50 to 80 years. Am. J. Manag. Care 2021, 27, 415–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Morley, J.E.; Vellas, B. Editorial: COVID-19 and Older Adults. J. Nutr. Health Aging. 2020, 24, 364–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. CDC COVID-19 Response Team; Chow, N.; Fleming-Dutra, K.; Gierke, R.; Hall, A.; Hughes, M.; Pilishvili, T.; Ritchey, M.; Roguski, M.; Skoff, T.; et al. Preliminary estimates of the prevalence of selected underlying health conditions among patients with coronavirus disease 2019—United States, February 12–March 28, 2020. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2020, 69, 382. [Google Scholar]
  42. Shortreed, S.M.; Gray, R.; Akosile, M.A.; Walker, R.L.; Fuller, S.; Temposky, L.; Fortmann, S.P.; Albertson-Junkans, L.; Floyd, J.S.; Bayliss, E.A. Increased COVID-19 infection risk drives racial and ethnic disparities in severe COVID-19 outcomes. J. Racial Ethn. Health Disparities 2023, 10, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Holden, T.M.; Simon, M.A.; Arnold, D.T.; Halloway, V.; Gerardin, J. Structural racism and COVID-19 response: Higher risk of exposure drives disparate COVID-19 deaths among Black and Hispanic/Latinx residents of Illinois, USA. BMC Public Health 2022, 22, 312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Vogels, E. Digital Divide Persists Even as Americans with Lower Incomes Make Gains in Tech Adoption. 2021. Available online: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/06/22/digital-divide-persists-even-as-americans-with-lower-incomes-make-gains-in-tech-adoption/ (accessed on 11 December 2022).
  45. Smith, B.; Magnani, J.W. New technologies, new disparities: The intersection of electronic health and digital health literacy. Int. J. Cardiol. 2019, 292, 280–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Rovner, B.W.; Casten, R.J.; Chang, A.M.; Hollander, J.E.; Rising, K. Mistrust, Neighborhood Deprivation, and Telehealth Use in African Americans with Diabetes. Popul. Health Manag. 2021, 24, 699–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Ramirez, A.V.; Ojeaga, M.; Espinoza, V.; Hensler, B.; Honrubia, V. Telemedicine in Minority and Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Communities Amidst COVID-19 Pandemic. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2021, 164, 91–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Webber, E.C.; McMillen, B.D.; Willis, D.R. Health Care Disparities and Access to Video Visits before and after the COVID-19 Pandemic: Findings from a Patient Survey in Primary Care. Telemed. J. e-Health 2021, 28, 712–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Neeman, E.; Lyon, L.; Sun, H.; Conell, C.; Reed, M.; Kumar, D.; Kolevska, T.; Kotak, D.; Sundaresan, T.; Liu, R. Future of Teleoncology: Trends and Disparities in Telehealth and Secure Message Utilization in the COVID-19 Era. JCO Clin. Cancer Inform. 2022, 6, e2100160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Hamadi, H.Y.; Zhao, M.; Haley, D.R.; Dunn, A.; Paryani, S.; Spaulding, A. Medicare and telehealth: The impact of COVID-19 pandemic. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 2022, 28, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lama, Y.; Davidoff, A.J.; Vanderpool, R.C.; Jensen, R.E. Telehealth Availability and Use of Related Technologies among Medicare-Enrolled Cancer Survivors: Cross-sectional Findings from the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic. J. Med. Internet Res. 2022, 24, e34616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ng, B.P.; Park, C. Accessibility of Telehealth Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Medicare Beneficiaries. Prev. Chronic Dis. 2021, 18, E65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wardlow, L.; Roberts, C.; Archbald-Pannone, L.; Collaborative for Telehealth and Aging. Perceptions and Uses of Telehealth in the Care of Older Adults. Telemed. J. e-Health 2022. ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Anderson, A.; O’Connell, S.S.; Thomas, C.; Chimmanamada, R. Telehealth Interventions to Improve Diabetes Management among Black and Hispanic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Racial Ethn. Health Disparities 2022, 9, 2375–2386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hayrapetian, L.; Zepp, M.; Rao, S.; Hennessey, M.; Houle, M.; Atienza, M.; Belfaqeeh, O.A.; Dharia, I.; Khan, A.; Borum, M.L. Expanding telehealth options during the COVID pandemic eliminated racial and age disparities in electronic communication by inflammatory bowel disease patients. J. Natl. Med. Assoc. 2021, 113, 474–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. McCall, T.; Schwartz, T.; Khairat, S. Acceptability of Telemedicine to Help African American Women Manage Anxiety and Depression. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2019, 264, 699–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Puzzitiello, R.N.; Moverman, M.A.; Pagani, N.R.; Ryan, S.P.; Salzler, M.J.; Jawa, A.; Menendez, M.E. Public perceptions and disparities in access to telehealth orthopaedic services in the COVID-19 era. J. Natl. Med. Assoc. 2021, 113, 405–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. George, S.; Hamilton, A.; Baker, R.S. How Do Low-Income Urban African Americans and Latinos Feel about Telemedicine? A Diffusion of Innovation Analysis. Int. J. Telemed. Appl. 2012, 2012, 715194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Wegermann, K.; Patel, Y.; Wilder, J. Health Equity and Telemedicine in Gastroenterology and Hepatology. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021, 19, 1516–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lew, S.Q.; Wallace, E.L.; Srivatana, V.; Warady, B.A.; Watnick, S.; Hood, J.; White, D.L.; Aggarwal, V.; Wilkie, C.; Naljayan, M.V.; et al. Telehealth for Home Dialysis in COVID-19 and Beyond: A Perspective from the American Society of Nephrology COVID-19 Home Dialysis Subcommittee. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2021, 77, 142–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Shelton, R.L.; Hall, M.; Ford, S.; Cosby, R.L. Telehealth in a Washington, DC African American religious community at the onset of COVID-19: Showcasing a virtual health ministry project. Soc. Work. Health Care 2021, 60, 208–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Bazargan, M.; Loeza, M.; Ekwegh, T.; Adinkrah, E.K.; Kibe, L.W.; Cobb, S.; Assari, S.; Bazargan-Hejazi, S. Multi-Dimensional Impact of Chronic Low Back Pain among Underserved African American and Latino Older Adults. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 7246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Derose, K.P.; Williams, M.V.; Branch, C.A.; Flórez, K.R.; Hawes-Dawson, J.; Mata, M.A.; Oden, C.W.; Wong, E.C. A Community-Partnered Approach to Developing Church-Based Interventions to Reduce Health Disparities among African-Americans and Latinos. J. Racial Ethn. Health Disparities 2019, 6, 254–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Cobb, S.; Bazargan, M.; Assari, S.; Barkley, L.; Bazargan-Hejazi, S. Emergency Department Utilization, Hospital Admissions, and Office-Based Physician Visits among Under-Resourced African American and Latino Older Adults. J. Racial Ethn. Health Disparities 2023, 10, 205–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Fischer, S.H.; Ray, K.N.; Mehrotra, A.; Bloom, E.L.; Uscher-Pines, L. Prevalence and Characteristics of Telehealth Utilization in the United States. JAMA Netw. Open 2020, 3, e2022302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Qian, L.; Sy, L.S.; Hong, V.; Glenn, S.C.; Ryan, D.S.; Morrissette, K.; Jacobsen, S.J.; Xu, S. Disparities in Outpatient and Telehealth Visits during the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Large Integrated Health Care Organization: Retrospective Cohort Study. J. Med. Internet Res. 2021, 23, e29959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Rodriguez, J.A.; Betancourt, J.R.; Sequist, T.D.; Ganguli, I. Differences in the use of telephone and video telemedicine visits during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am. J. Manag. Care 2021, 27, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. George, M.D.; Danila, M.I.; Watrous, D.; Reddy, S.; Alper, J.; Xie, F.; Nowell, W.B.; Kallich, J.; Clinton, C.; Saag, K.G.; et al. Disruptions in Rheumatology Care and the Rise of Telehealth in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Community Practice-Based Network. Arthritis Care Res. 2021, 73, 1153–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Chen, E.M.; Andoh, J.E.; Nwanyanwu, K. Socioeconomic and Demographic Disparities in the Use of Telemedicine for Ophthalmic Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Ophthalmology 2022, 129, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Evans, M.C.; Cobb, S.; Smith, J.; Bazargan, M.; Assari, S. Depressive Symptoms among Economically Disadvantaged African American Older Adults in South Los Angeles. Brain Sci. 2019, 9, 246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Mobasher, Z.; Baldwin, S.B.; Navarro, B.; Bressler-Montgomery, D.; King, J.; Family, L.; Smith, L.V.; Kuo, T. Knowledge and perceptions of human trafficking among community-based and faith-based organization members in South Los Angeles. Glob. Health Promot. 2022, 29, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Adinkrah, E.; Bazargan, M.; Wisseh, C.; Assari, S. Medication Complexity among Disadvantaged African American Seniors in Los Angeles. Pharmacy 2020, 8, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Bazargan, M.; Smith, J.L.; Robinson, P.; Uyanne, J.; Abdulrahoof, R.; Chuku, C.; Assari, S. Chronic Respiratory Disease and Health-Related Quality of Life of African American Older Adults in an Economically Disadvantaged Area of Los Angeles. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Dyer, O. Covid-19: Black people and other minorities are hardest hit in US. BMJ 2020, 369, m1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Khunti, K.; Singh, A.K.; Pareek, M.; Hanif, W. Is ethnicity linked to incidence or outcomes of covid-19? BMJ 2020, 369, m1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Röhr, S.; Müller, F.; Jung, F.; Apfelbacher, C.; Seidler, A.; Riedel-Heller, S.G. Psychosocial Impact of Quarantine Measures during Serious Coronavirus Outbreaks: A Rapid Review. Psychiatr. Prax. 2020, 47, 179–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Assari, S.; Habibzadeh, P. The COVID-19 Emergency Response Should Include a Mental Health Component. Arch. Iran. Med. 2020, 23, 281–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Pareek, M.; Bangash, M.N.; Pareek, N.; Pan, D.; Sze, S.; Minhas, J.S.; Hanif, W.; Khunti, K. Ethnicity and COVID-19: An urgent public health research priority. Lancet 2020, 395, 1421–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Demographic, financial, and health-related characteristics and telehealth use among a sample of underserved, community-based, middle-aged and older African American adults (n = 150).
Table 1. Demographic, financial, and health-related characteristics and telehealth use among a sample of underserved, community-based, middle-aged and older African American adults (n = 150).
N (%)
Gender
  • Male
  • Female

45 (30)
105 (70)
Age
  • 55–64
  • 65–74
  • 75 and older

48 (32)
68 (45)
34 (23)
Education
  • No High School Diploma
  • High School Diploma
  • Some College/Graduate

19 (13)
40 (27)
91 (60)
Medicare
  • No
  • Yes

78 (52)
72 (48)
Telehealth use since COVID-19
  • No
  • Yes

47 (32)
102 (68)
Type of Telehealth
  • Telephone
  • Video
  • Not Used

73 (49)
29 (19)
47 (32)
Cellular Network (Phone)
  • No
  • Yes

52 (38)
85 (62)
Internet (Wi-Fi) at home
  • No
  • Yes

35 (25)
106 (75)
Mean ± SD
Age68.5 ± 8.66
Financial Strains (1 = never to 4 = always)
  • Food
  • Rent/Mortgage
  • Clothes
  • Utilities
1.72 ± 1.03
1.64 ± 1.06
1.77 ± 1.20
1.73 ± 1.15
1.75 ± 1.11
Number of Major Chronic Conditions1.22 ± 1.01
COVID-19 Knowledge
(0: low to 2: high)		1.52 ± 0.37
COVID-19 Perceived Threat and Stress
(0: no stress to 7: significant stress)		3.56 ± 2.21
COVID-19 Vaccination Attitude
(1: very negative to 5: very positive)		4.03 ± 0.74
Table
Table 2. Bivariate correlations between telehealth utilization and other study variables.
Table 2. Bivariate correlations between telehealth utilization and other study variables.
1234567891011
  • Telehealth
--
2.
Gender
−0.099--
3.
Age
0.097−0.071--
4.
Education
0.141−0.017−0.143--
5.
Medicare
−0.095−0.1050.347 **−0.050--
6.
Financial Strain
−0.121−0.014−0.112−0.243 **−0.094--
7.
Chronic Illness
0.252 **0.0070.181 *−0.0370.1430.022-
8.
Perceived COVID Risk
0.166 *−0.0900.048−0.021−0.0220.0340.162--
9.
Knowledge of COVID
0.138−0.060−0.0410.1150.142−0.191 *0.147−0.012--
10.
COVID Attitude
0.282 **−0.0980.0020.189 *−0.028−0.0870.156−0.0140.103--
11.
A Cellular Network
0.207 *−0.007−0.218 *0.0620.069−0.175 *−0.0170.0460.1670.134-
12.
Internet (at home)
0.236 **0.024−0.209 *0.294 **0.013−0.0710.0370.0080.156−0.0260.229 **
Note: ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed), and * correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (two-tailed).
Table
Table 3. Binary Logistic Regression, EXP(B) the exponentiation of the B coefficient (odds ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI)).
Table 3. Binary Logistic Regression, EXP(B) the exponentiation of the B coefficient (odds ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI)).
Independent VariablesBWaldEXP(B)95% CI
EXP(B)		Sig.
Gender−0.1930.1160.8250.273–2.4940.733
Age0.1217.2741.1291.034–1.2330.007
Education0.0620.0531.0640.629–1.7990.818
Medicare−1.6826.6480.1860.052–0.6680.010
Financial Strain0.1110.1341.1170.617–2.0230.714
Chronic Conditions0.3092.2141.3630.906–2.0480.137
Internet (at home)2.42411.65111.2872.807–45.3930.001
Cellular Network (on phone)1.4415.0934.2251.209–14.7670.024
Perceived Threat of COVID-190.2744.4831.3151.021–1.6940.034
Knowledge of COVID-19−0.5880.7280.5560.144–2.1440.394
Attitude Toward Vaccination0.8724.3892.3911.058–5.4040.036
Constant−13.0278.0910.000N/A0.004
−2 Log Likelihood = 95.9; Cox & Snell R Square = 0.288; Nagelkerke R Square = 0.421.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ekwegh, T.; Cobb, S.; Adinkrah, E.K.; Vargas, R.; Kibe, L.W.; Sanchez, H.; Waller, J.; Ameli, H.; Bazargan, M. Factors Associated with Telehealth Utilization among Older African Americans in South Los Angeles during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 2675. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032675

AMA Style

Ekwegh T, Cobb S, Adinkrah EK, Vargas R, Kibe LW, Sanchez H, Waller J, Ameli H, Bazargan M. Factors Associated with Telehealth Utilization among Older African Americans in South Los Angeles during the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023; 20(3):2675. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032675

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ekwegh, Tavonia, Sharon Cobb, Edward K. Adinkrah, Roberto Vargas, Lucy W. Kibe, Humberto Sanchez, Joe Waller, Hoorolnesa Ameli, and Mohsen Bazargan. 2023. "Factors Associated with Telehealth Utilization among Older African Americans in South Los Angeles during the COVID-19 Pandemic" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, no. 3: 2675. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032675

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop