A New Gain Spiral at Work: Relationships between Virtuous Organizational Practices, Psychological Capital, and Well-Being of Workers
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Virtuous Organizational Practices and Hedonic, Eudaimonic, and Social Well-Being
1.2. The Mediational Role of Psychological Capital
2. Method
2.1. Procedure
2.2. Participants
2.3. Measures
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Preliminary Analysis
3.2. Validation of Measurement Models
3.3. Correlation Analysis
3.4. Structural Equation Modeling
4. Discussion
5. Limitations and Future Research
Practical Implications
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Allan, B.A.; Kim, T.; Liu, T.Y.; Owens, R.L. Are work well-being variables distinct? A bifactor model of fulfilling work. J. Couns. Psychol. 2021, 68, 425–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ilies, R.; Wagner, D.; Wilson, K.; Ceja, L.; Johnson, M.; Derue, S.; Ilgen, D. Flow at Work and Basic Psychological Needs: Effects on Well-Being. Appl. Psychol. 2017, 66, 3–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alikaj, Y.; Xu, S.; Jin, J.; Ford, M.T. The within and cross domain effects of work-family enrichment: A meta-analysis. J. Vocat. Behav. 2018, 104, 210–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blanco-Encomienda, F.J.; García-Cantero, R.; Latorre-Medina, M.J. Association between Work-Related Rumination, Work Environment and Employee Well-Being: A Meta-Analytic Study of Main and Moderator Effects. Soc. Indic. Res. 2020, 150, 887–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fasbender, U.; Van Der Heijden, B.I.J.M.; Grimshaw, S. Job satisfaction, job stress and nurses’ turnover intentions: The moderating roles of on-the-job and off-the-job embeddedness. J. Adv. Nurs. 2019, 75, 327–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khamisa, N.; Peltzer, K.; Ilic, D.; Oldenburg, B. Work related stress, burnout, job satisfaction and general health of nurses: A follow-up study. Int. J. Nurs. Pract. 2016, 22, 538–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ford, M.T.; Cerasoli, C.P.; Higgins, J.A.; DeCesare, A.L. Relationships between psychological, physical, and behavioural health and work performance: A review and meta-analysis. Work. Stress 2011, 25, 185–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gutiérrez, O.I.; Polo, J.D.; Zambrano, M.J.; Molina, D.C. Meta-analysis and Scientific Mapping of Well-being and Job Performance. Span. J. Psychol. 2020, 23, e43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meyer, J.P.; Stanley, D.J.; Herscovitch, L.; Topolnytsky, L. Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment to the Organization: A Meta-analysis of Antecedents, Correlates, and Consequences. J. Vocat. Behav. 2002, 61, 20–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eatough, E.M.; Chang, C.-H.; Miloslavic, S.A.; Johnson, R.E. Relationships of role stressors with organizational citizenship behavior: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 2011, 96, 619–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dirks, K.T.; Ferrin, D.L. Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. J. Appl. Psychol. 2002, 87, 611–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nielsen, K.; Nielsen, M.B.; Ogbonnaya, C.; Känsälä, M.; Saari, E.; Isaksson, K. Workplace resources to improve both employee well-being and performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Work. Stress 2017, 31, 101–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chevalier, S.; Lejeune, J.; Fouquereau, E.; Coillot, H.; Gillet, N.; Gandemer, V.; Michon, J.; Colombat, P. Organizational and Managerial Resources and Quality of Care in French Pediatric Oncology Nursing. J. Pediatr. Oncol. Nurs. 2017, 34, 406–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chevalier, S.; Coillot, H.; Colombat, P.; Bosselut, G.; Guilbert, L.; Fouquereau, E. An explanatory model of authentic leadership, flourishing and work–family balance of nurses in French hospitals. Leadersh. Health Serv. 2021, 34, 112–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gillet, N.; Gagné, M.; Sauvagère, S.; Fouquereau, E. The role of supervisor autonomy support, organizational support, and autonomous and controlled motivation in predicting employees’ satisfaction and turnover intentions. Eur. J. Work. Organ. Psychol. 2013, 22, 450–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, L.; Swanson, S.R. Perceived corporate social responsibility’s impact on the well-being and supportive green behaviors of hotel employees: The mediating role of the employee-corporate relationship. Tour. Manag. 2019, 72, 437–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aubouin-Bonnaventure, J.; Fouquereau, E.; Coillot, H.; Lahiani, F.J.; Chevalier, S. Virtuous Organizational Practices: A New Construct and a New Inventory. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 724956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cameron, K.S.; Caza, A. Introduction: Contributions to the Discipline of Positive Organizational Scholarship. Am. Behav. Sci. 2004, 47, 731–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meyer, M. The Evolution and Challenges of the Concept of Organizational Virtuousness in Positive Organizational Scholarship. J. Bus. Ethics 2018, 153, 245–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Butts, M.M.; Casper, W.J.; Yang, T.S. How important are work–family support policies? A meta-analytic investigation of their effects on employee outcomes. J. Appl. Psychol. 2013, 98, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clarke, S. An integrative model of safety climate: Linking psychological climate and work attitudes to individual safety outcomes using meta-analysis. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 2010, 83, 553–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grawitch, M.J.; Trares, S.; Kohler, J.M. Healthy workplace practices and employee outcomes. Int. J. Stress Manag. 2007, 14, 275–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kooij, D.T.A.M.; Jansen, P.G.W.; Dikkers, J.S.E.; De Lange, A.H. The influence of age on the associations between HR practices and both affective commitment and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. J. Organ. Behav. 2010, 31, 1111–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Aubouin-Bonnaventure, J.; Chevalier, S.; Beltou, N.; Fouquereau, E. Comportements et Contextes Professionnels Positifs: Un Changement Majeur de Paradigme. In Diversité et Actualité de la Psychologie Positive; Aguerre, C., Chasseigne, G., Eds.; Éditions Complicités Universitaires: Paris, France, 2022; pp. 53–70. [Google Scholar]
- Bakker, A.B.; Demerouti, E. The Job Demands-Resources model: State of the art. J. Manag. Psychol. 2007, 22, 309–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Demerouti, E.; Bakker, A.B.; Nachreiner, F.; Schaufeli, W.B. The job demands-resources model of burnout. J. Appl. Psychol. 2001, 86, 499–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brauchli, R.; Jenny, G.J.; Füllemann, D.; Bauer, G.F. Towards a Job Demands-Resources Health Model: Empirical Testing with Generalizable Indicators of Job Demands, Job Resources, and Comprehensive Health Outcomes. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 959621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hobfoll, S.E. Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. Am. Psychol. 1989, 44, 513–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hobfoll, S.E. Conservation of resource caravans and engaged settings: Conservation of resource caravans. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 2011, 84, 116–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hobfoll, S.E.; Halbesleben, J.; Neveu, J.-P.; Westman, M. Conservation of Resources in the Organizational Context: The Reality of Resources and Their Consequences. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 2018, 5, 103–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Caesens, G.; Stinglhamber, F. The relationship between perceived organizational support and work engagement: The role of self-efficacy and its outcomes. Eur. Rev. Appl. Psychol. 2014, 64, 259–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wolter, C.; Maria, A.S.; Wörfel, F.; Gusy, B.; Lesener, T.; Kleiber, D.; Renneberg, B. Job Demands, Job Resources, and Well-being in Police Officers—A Resource-Oriented Approach. J. Police Crim. Psychol. 2018, 34, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Danna, K.; Griffin, R.W. Health and Well-Being in the Workplace: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature. J. Manag. 1999, 25, 357–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- World Health Organization. Preamble of the Constitution of the World Health Organization as Adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, NY, USA, 19 June–22 July 1946; Signed on 22 July 1946 by the Representatives of 61 States (Official Record of the World Health Organization, no. 2, p. 100) and Entered into Force on 7 April 1948. Available online: http://whqlib-doc.who.int/hist/official_records/constitution.pdf (accessed on 10 January 2023).
- Keyes, C.L.M. Complete mental health: An agenda for the 21st century. In Flourishing: Positive Psychology and the Life Well-Lived; American Psychological Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2003; pp. 293–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keyes, C.L.M. Mental Illness and/or Mental Health? Investigating Axioms of the Complete State Model of Health. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 2005, 73, 539–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ryan, R.M.; Deci, E.L. On Happiness and Human Potentials: A Review of Research on Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-Being. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2001, 52, 141–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, M.; Pérez-Díaz, P.A.; Mao, Y.; Petrides, K.V. A Multilevel Model of Teachers’ Job Performance: Understanding the Effects of Trait Emotional Intelligence, Job Satisfaction, and Organizational Trust. Front. Psychol. 2018, 9, 2420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Locke, E.A. The Nature and Causes of Job Satisfaction. In Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology; Dunnette, M.D., Ed.; Rand McNally: Chicago, IL, USA, 1976; pp. 1297–1351. [Google Scholar]
- Geisler, M.; Berthelsen, H.; Muhonen, T. Retaining Social Workers: The Role of Quality of Work and Psychosocial Safety Climate for Work Engagement, Job Satisfaction, and Organizational Commitment. Hum. Serv. Organ. Manag. Leadersh. Gov. 2019, 43, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gragnano, A.; Miglioretti, M.; Frings-Dresen, M.H.W.; de Boer, A.G.E.M. Adjustment between work demands and health needs: Development of the Work–Health Balance Questionnaire. Rehabil. Psychol. 2017, 62, 374–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nixon, A.E.; Lanz, J.J.; Manapragada, A.; Bruk-Lee, V.; Schantz, A.; Rodriguez, J.F. Nurse safety: How is safety climate related to affect and attitude? Work. Stress 2015, 29, 401–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Snape, E.; Redman, T. Industrial Relations Climate and Union Commitment: An Evaluation of Workplace-Level Effects. Ind. Relat. J. Econ. Soc. 2012, 51, 11–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryan, R.M.; Huta, V.; Deci, E.L. Living well: A self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia. J. Happiness Stud. 2008, 9, 139–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gerbasi, A.; Porath, C.L.; Parker, A.; Spreitzer, G.; Cross, R. Destructive de-energizing relationships: How thriving buffers their effect on performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 2015, 100, 1423–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kleine, A.; Rudolph, C.W.; Zacher, H. Thriving at work: A meta-analysis. J. Organ. Behav. 2019, 40, 973–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Prem, R.; Ohly, S.; Kubicek, B.; Korunka, C. Thriving on challenge stressors? Exploring time pressure and learning demands as antecedents of thriving at work. J. Organ. Behav. 2017, 38, 108–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Spreitzer, G.; Sutcliffe, K.; Dutton, J.; Sonenshein, S.; Grant, A.M. A Socially Embedded Model of Thriving at Work. Organ. Sci. 2005, 16, 537–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Porath, C.; Spreitzer, G.; Gibson, C.; Garnett, F.G. Thriving at work: Toward its measurement, construct validation, and theoretical refinement. J. Organ. Behav. 2012, 33, 250–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhang, J.; Bal, P.M.; Akhtar, M.N.; Long, L.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, Z. High-performance work system and employee performance: The mediating roles of social exchange and thriving and the moderating effect of employee proactive personality. Asia Pac. J. Hum. Resour. 2018, 57, 369–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alikaj, A.; Ning, W.; Wu, B. Proactive Personality and Creative Behavior: Examining the Role of Thriving at Work and High-Involvement HR Practices. J. Bus. Psychol. 2021, 36, 857–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keyes, C.L.M. Social Well-Being. Soc. Psychol. Q. 1998, 61, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gilbert, M.-H.; Dagenais-Desmarais, V.; Savoie, A. Validation d’une mesure de santé psychologique au travail. Eur. Rev. Appl. Psychol. 2011, 61, 195–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haar, J.M.; Sune, A.; Russo, M.; Ollier-Malaterre, A. A Cross-National Study on the Antecedents of Work–Life Balance from the Fit and Balance Perspective. Soc. Indic. Res. 2019, 142, 261–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wattoo, M.A.; Zhao, S.; Xi, M. High-performance work systems and work–family interface: Job autonomy and self-efficacy as mediators. Asia Pac. J. Hum. Resour. 2019, 58, 128–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baltes, B.B.; Briggs, T.E.; Huff, J.W.; Wright, J.A.; Neuman, G.A. Flexible and compressed workweek schedules: A meta-analysis of their effects on work-related criteria. J. Appl. Psychol. 1999, 84, 496–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kossek, E.E.; Pichler, S.; Bodner, T.; Hammer, L.B. Workplace Social Support and Work-Family Conflict: A Meta-Analysis Clarifying the Influence of General and Work-Family-Specific Supervisor and Organizational Support. Pers. Psychol. 2011, 64, 289–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Michel, J.S.; Kotrba, L.M.; Mitchelson, J.K.; Clark, M.A.; Baltes, B.B. Antecedents of work-family conflict: A meta-analytic review. J. Organ. Behav. 2011, 32, 689–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boxall, P.; Macky, K. High-involvement work processes, work intensification and employee well-being. Work. Employ. Soc. 2014, 28, 963–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mansour, S.; Tremblay, D.-G. Psychosocial safety climate as resource passageways to alleviate work-family conflict: A study in the health sector in Quebec. Pers. Rev. 2018, 47, 474–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carvalho, V.S.; Chambel, M.J. Perceived High-Performance Work Systems and Subjective Well-Being: Work-to-Family Balance and Well-Being at Work as Mediators. J. Career Dev. 2015, 43, 116–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, J.; Kim, A.; Han, K.; Ryu, S.; Park, J.G.; Kwon, B. Antecedents and consequences of satisfaction with work-family balance: A moderating role of perceived insider status. J. Organ. Behav. 2017, 39, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ten Brummelhuis, L.L.; Bakker, A.B. A resource perspective on the work–home interface: The work–home resources model. Am. Psychol. 2012, 67, 545–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hobfoll, S.E. Social and Psychological Resources and Adaptation. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 2002, 6, 307–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luthans, F.; Youssef, C.M. Emerging Positive Organizational Behavior. J. Manag. 2007, 33, 321–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Luthans, F.; Avolio, B.J.; Avey, J.B.; Norman, S.M. Positive Psychological Capital: Measurement and Relationship with Performance and Satisfaction. Pers. Psychol. 2007, 60, 541–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Avey, J.B. The Left Side of Psychological Capital: New Evidence on the Antecedents of PsyCap. J. Leadersh. Organ. Stud. 2014, 21, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bandura, A. Self-Efficacy. In Encyclopedia of Human Behavior; Ramachaudran, V.S., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1994; Volume 4, pp. 71–81. [Google Scholar]
- Hur, W.-M.; Rhee, S.-Y.; Ahn, K.-H. Positive psychological capital and emotional labor in Korea: The job demands-resources approach. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2016, 27, 477–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van De Voorde, K.; Beijer, S. The role of employee HR attributions in the relationship between high-performance work systems and employee outcomes. Hum. Resour. Manag. J. 2014, 25, 62–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Masten, A.S.; Reed, M.J. Resilience in development. In Handbook of Positive Psychology; Snyder, C.R., Lopez, S.J., Eds.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2002; pp. 117–131. [Google Scholar]
- Bardoel, E.A.; Pettit, T.M.; De Cieri, H.; McMillan, L. Employee resilience: An emerging challenge for HRM. Asia Pac. J. Hum. Resour. 2014, 52, 279–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Avey, J.B.; Reichard, R.J.; Luthans, F.; Mhatre, K.H. Meta-analysis of the impact of positive psychological capital on employee attitudes, behaviors, and performance. Hum. Resour. Dev. Q. 2011, 22, 127–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kong, F.; Tsai, C.-H.; Tsai, F.-S.; Huang, W.; De la Cruz, S.M. Psychological Capital Research: A Meta-Analysis and Implications for Management Sustainability. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fredrickson, B.L. What Good Are Positive Emotions? Rev. Gen. Psychol. 1998, 2, 300–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Youssef-Morgan, C.M.; Luthans, F. Psychological Capital and Well-being. Stress Health 2015, 31, 180–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fouquereau, E.; Rioux, L. Élaboration de l’Échelle de satisfaction de vie professionnelle (ÉSVP) en langue française: Une démarche exploratoire. Can. J. Behav. Sci./Rev. Can. des Sci. du Comport. 2002, 34, 210–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allen, T.D.; Johnson, R.C.; Saboe, K.N.; Cho, E.; Dumani, S.; Evans, S. Dispositional variables and work–family conflict: A meta-analysis. J. Vocat. Behav. 2012, 80, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siu, O.L. Psychological Capital, Work Well-Being, and Work-Life Balance Among Chinese Employees: A Cross-Lagged Analysis. J. Pers. Psychol. 2013, 12, 170–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, S.-L. Cross-level effects of high-commitment work systems on work engagement: The mediating role of psychological capital. Asia Pac. J. Hum. Resour. 2018, 56, 384–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miao, R.; Bozionelos, N.; Zhou, W.; Newman, A. High-performance work systems and key employee attitudes: The roles of psychological capital and an interactional justice climate. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2021, 32, 443–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 2013, 310, 2191–2194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lorenz, T.; Beer, C.; Pütz, J.; Heinitz, K. Measuring Psychological Capital: Construction and Validation of the Compound PsyCap Scale (CPC-12). PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0152892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tavani, J.; Botella, M.; Collange, J. Quelle validité pour une mesure de la satisfaction au travail en un seul item? Prat. Psychol. 2014, 20, 125–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haar, J.M. Testing a new measure of work–life balance: A study of parent and non-parent employees from New Zealand. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2013, 24, 3305–3324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tabachnick, B.G.; Fidell, L.S. Using Multivariate Statistics, 6th ed.; Pearson: Boston, MA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- George, D.; Mallery, P. SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, 17.0 update (10th ed.); Allyn & Bacon: Boston, MA, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Kline, R.B. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling; The Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Anderson, J.C.; Gerbing, D.W. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol. Bull. 1988, 103, 411–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jöreskog, K.G. Some contributions to maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika 1967, 32, 443–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jöreskog, J.; Sörbom, D. LISREL 8.50; Scientific Software: Chicago IL, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Browne, M.; Cudeck, R. Single Sample Cross-Validation Indices for Covariance Structures. Multivar. Behav. Res. 1989, 24, 445–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bentler, P.M. Comparative Fit Indexes in Structural Models. Psychol. Bull. 1990, 107, 238–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Akaike, H. Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika 1987, 52, 317–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hayes, A.F. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach; The Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Blom, R.; Kruyen, P.M.; Van Der Heijden, B.I.J.M.; Van Thiel, S. One HRM Fits All? A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of HRM Practices in the Public, Semipublic, and Private Sector. Rev. Public Pers. Adm. 2020, 40, 3–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Podsakoff, P.M.; MacKenzie, S.B.; Lee, J.-Y.; Podsakoff, N.P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 2003, 88, 879–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andersén, J.; Andersén, A. Are high-performance work systems (HPWS) appreciated by everyone? The role of management position and gender on the relationship between HPWS and affective commitment. Empl. Relat. Int. J. 2019, 41, 1046–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shin, D.; Garmendia, A.; Ali, M.; Konrad, A.M.; Madinabeitia-Olabarria, D. HRM systems and employee affective commitment: The role of employee gender. Gend. Manag. Int. J. 2020, 35, 189–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Colquitt, J.A.; Conlon, D.E.; Wesson, M.J.; Porter, C.O.L.H.; Ng, K.Y. Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. J. Appl. Psychol. 2001, 86, 425–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aubouin-Bonnaventure, J.; Chevalier, S.; Coillot, H.; Lahiani, F.-J.; Fouquereau, E. Effets des pratiques organisationnelles vertueuses sur les comportements citoyens et l’intention de rester dans l’entreprise: Le rôle médiateur de l’adéquation personne-organisation. Psychol. du Trav. et des Organ. 2022, 28, 183–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sweet, S.; Pitt-Catsouphes, M.; James, J.B. Manager attitudes concerning flexible work arrangements: Fixed or changeable? Community Work. Fam. 2017, 20, 50–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zohar, D.; Luria, G. Group Leaders as Gatekeepers: Testing Safety Climate Varia- tions across Levels of Analysis. Appl. Psychol. 2010, 59, 647–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meyer, B.; Zill, A.; Dilba, D.; Gerlach, R.; Schumann, S. Employee psychological well-being during theCOVID-19 pandemic in Germany: A longitudinal study of demands, resources, and exhaustion. Int. J. Psychol. 2021, 56, 532–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, W.; Yin, H.; Huang, S. The missing links between emotional job demand and exhaustion and satisfaction: Testing a moderated mediation model. J. Manag. Organ. 2016, 22, 80–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wegge, J.; Schmidt, K.-H.; Parkes, C.; Dick, R. Taking a sickie: Job satisfaction and job involvement as interactive predictors of absenteeism in a public organization. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 2007, 80, 77–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tang, Y.; Shao, Y.-F.; Chen, Y.-J. Assessing the Mediation Mechanism of Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment on Innovative Behavior: The Perspective of Psychological Capital. Front. Psychol. 2019, 10, 2699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bin Bae, K.; Goodman, D. The Influence of Family-Friendly Policies on Turnover and Performance in South Korea. Public Pers. Manag. 2014, 43, 520–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hill, E.J.; Grzywacz, J.G.; Allen, S.; Blanchard, V.L.; Matz-Costa, C.; Shulkin, S.; Pitt-Catsouphes, M. Defining and conceptualizing workplace flexibility. Community Work. Fam. 2008, 11, 149–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gulseren, D.B.; Thibault, T.; Kelloway, E.K.; Mullen, J.; Teed, M.; Gilbert, S.; Dimoff, J.K. R.I.G.H.T. leadership: Scale development and validation of a psychologically healthy leadership model. Can. J. Adm. Sci./Rev. Can. des Sci. de l’Administration 2021, 38, 430–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Redín, D.M.; Meyer, M.; Rego, A. Positive leadership action framework: Simply doing good and doing well. Front. Psychol. 2023, 13, 977750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
M | SD | Skewness Coefficients | Kurtosis Coefficients | α | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOP | 3.26 | 0.57 | −0.34 | 0.94 | 0.93 |
PPDM | 2.76 | 0.83 | 0.00 | −0.36 | |
WLBP | 2.94 | 0.78 | −0.19 | 0.04 | |
HSP | 3.49 | 0.70 | −0.55 | 0.59 | |
RP | 3.29 | 0.79 | −0.31 | −0.09 | |
PCM | 3.51 | 0.72 | −0.55 | 0.53 | |
CP | 3.49 | 0.74 | −0.85 | 0.81 | |
OJP | 3.28 | 0.74 | −0.20 | 0.29 | |
SDP | 3.33 | 0.68 | −0.44 | 0.99 | |
PsyCap | 3.69 | 0.43 | −0.12 | 0.58 | 0.82 |
Hope | 3.74 | 0.48 | −0.23 | 0.75 | |
Self-efficacy | 3.79 | 0.57 | −0.27 | 0.65 | |
Resilience | 3.74 | 0.53 | −0.01 | 0.28 | |
Optimism | 3.49 | 0.66 | −0.26 | −0.21 | |
Job satisfaction | 3.96 | 0.67 | −0.75 | 1.43 | - |
Thriving at work | 3.80 | 0.52 | −0.50 | 0.87 | 0.86 |
Vitality | 3.85 | 0.60 | −0.74 | 1.29 | |
Learning | 3.75 | 0.54 | −0.33 | 0.56 | |
Work-life balance | 3.66 | 0.72 | −0.49 | 0.22 | 0.80 |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 VOP | _ | ||||
2 PsyCap | 0.32 | _ | |||
3 Job satisfaction | 0.40 | 0.60 | _ | ||
4 Thriving at work | 0.48 | 0.51 | 0.51 | _ | |
5 Work-life balance | 0.37 | 0.57 | 0.46 | 0.46 | _ |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Aubouin-Bonnaventure, J.; Fouquereau, E.; Coillot, H.; Lahiani, F.-J.; Chevalier, S. A New Gain Spiral at Work: Relationships between Virtuous Organizational Practices, Psychological Capital, and Well-Being of Workers. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 1823. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20031823
Aubouin-Bonnaventure J, Fouquereau E, Coillot H, Lahiani F-J, Chevalier S. A New Gain Spiral at Work: Relationships between Virtuous Organizational Practices, Psychological Capital, and Well-Being of Workers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023; 20(3):1823. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20031823
Chicago/Turabian StyleAubouin-Bonnaventure, Julia, Evelyne Fouquereau, Hélène Coillot, Fadi-Joseph Lahiani, and Séverine Chevalier. 2023. "A New Gain Spiral at Work: Relationships between Virtuous Organizational Practices, Psychological Capital, and Well-Being of Workers" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, no. 3: 1823. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20031823
APA StyleAubouin-Bonnaventure, J., Fouquereau, E., Coillot, H., Lahiani, F. -J., & Chevalier, S. (2023). A New Gain Spiral at Work: Relationships between Virtuous Organizational Practices, Psychological Capital, and Well-Being of Workers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(3), 1823. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20031823