Next Article in Journal
Nursing Home Residents’ Perceptions of Challenges and Coping Strategies during COVID-19 Pandemic in China
Next Article in Special Issue
Teacher Well-Being in Chinese Universities: Examining the Relationship between Challenge—Hindrance Stressors, Job Satisfaction, and Teaching Engagement
Previous Article in Journal
Associations between the Timing and Nutritional Characteristics of Bedtime Meals and Sleep Quality for Nurses after a Rotating Night Shift: A Cross-Sectional Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Well-Being amongst College Students during COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from a Developing Country
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 20
Issue 2
10.3390/ijerph20021484
Review Report
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Deciding Alone or with Others: Employment Anxiety and Social Distance Predict Intuitiveness in Career Decision Making

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(2), 1484; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021484
by Xiaoli Shu 1,2, Jun Peng 2,* and Guilin Wang 1
Reviewer 1:
Aiqin Wang
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(2), 1484; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021484
Submission received: 8 December 2022 / Revised: 8 January 2023 / Accepted: 9 January 2023 / Published: 13 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Well-Being and Health in Education: Challenges, Chances, and Change)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This paper have some contributions for the theoretical basis of promoting effective decision making from the views of employment anxiety and social distance. But there are the following questions which can be solved.

 

1. What is the novel of this paper? Please show it clearly.

2. Please the author read carefully all context, many language,words or paragraph must be revised. Some paragraph just only is one word ?

3. Why not the author report the result of low employment anxiety group in the section 2.5.1?

4. Suggest the author show the sample number and descriptive characteristics of basic students information in the different groups and add the table about the difference and significant of different group in the section 2.5.2 . Because this result is very important to the conclusion.

5. Why not the authors report and control the impact of the education, major and family situation on the level of intuitive career decision?

Suggest the authors to add the only the model with control variables and the moderating effect of social distance in the regression model in the table 3, which can check the result more precisely. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

1. Please make the introduction more concise, focusing on the content you want to emphasize.

2. In order to assign subjects to the high employment anxiety group and the low employment anxiety group, information on the anxiety level is required in participants.

3. Are the research subjects 298 college students and 386 senior job-seeking students?

4. line 312 ' (t (296) = 9.35, p < 0.001, d = 1.12)' --> What does t(296) mean?

5. Please provide a rationale for the Anxiety Inducing Situation or explain why you created the situation that way.

6. Please check the agreement between the results and the statistical analysis.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop