Next Article in Journal
Risk Assessment of Early Lung Cancer with LDCT and Health Examinations
Previous Article in Journal
Incidence and Predictors of Loss to Follow Up among Patients Living with HIV under Dolutegravir in Bunia, Democratic Republic of Congo: A Prospective Cohort Study
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Communicating about Energy Policy in a Resource-Rich Jurisdiction during the Climate Crisis: Lessons from the People of Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(8), 4635; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084635
by Linda A. Selvey *, Morris Carpenter, Mattea Lazarou and Katherine Cullerton
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(8), 4635; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084635
Submission received: 8 March 2022 / Revised: 31 March 2022 / Accepted: 6 April 2022 / Published: 12 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Climate Change)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

see attachment

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Despite the fact it is a really interesting topic about energy policy in Australia, there are some methodological problems that make the paper not too much objective as it must be. For instance, the methodology is based on a questionnaire but it was answered only by 55 persons and 4 questionnaires were not considered so there is too much-reduced number to get an idea about the real interest or intention of these persons. A higher number of questionnaires is needed.
On the other hand, the study just does a descriptive statistics study but there are more inductive statistics that let the researchers determine, with a higher number of questionnaires, more interesting results.
Finally, the paper format is adequate and the English style is good. In consequence, the paper must be redone and part of the experiments and questionnaires, in my opinion, must be increased.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

After different changes, I consider the paper adequate for publication.

Back to TopTop