Next Article in Journal
Regression Models to Study the Total LOS Related to Valvuloplasty
Previous Article in Journal
COVID-19 Vaccination within the Context of Reactogenicity and Immunogenicity of ChAdOx1 Vaccine Administered to Teachers in Poland
 
 
Article

Developing Indicators to Measure Critical Health Literacy in the Context of Norwegian Lower Secondary Schools

1
Faculty of International Studies and Teacher Education, Oslo Metropolitan University, 0130 Oslo, Norway
2
Faculty of Health Science, Oslo Metropolitan University, 0130 Oslo, Norway
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Paul B. Tchounwou
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(5), 3116; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19053116
Received: 7 February 2022 / Revised: 2 March 2022 / Accepted: 3 March 2022 / Published: 7 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Adolescents)
A critical health literacy (CHL) approach is recommended for promoting health in the school context. This construct is complex and includes three interconnected domains: (A) appraisal of critical information, (B) awareness of the social determinants of health (SDH), and (C) collective action to promote health and well-being. In recent literature reviews, no measurement instrument that covers all three domains of CHL in the school-context was found. Our aim was to develop self-reported measurement scales for each domain of CHL. The development process reported in this study was conducted in two stages. In the first stage, an initial item pool was generated based on literature reviews and focus group interviews (N = 15) with adolescents (steps 1–2). In the next steps, items were adjusted and removed based on the feedback from an expert panel and from representatives from the target group (steps 3–5). In stage two, we aimed to reduce the number of items and develop scales for each domain. We then piloted the current draft, which consists of 28 items (N = 114). A sub-sample (N = 10) of the participants were interviewed after they completed the survey to examine the instrument’s face validity. Cronbach’s α was used to assess the internal reliability of the scales; the reliability was promising for scales A (α = 0.83) and C (α = 0.85) but was below the recommended value for scale B (α = 0.61). The model fit indices were promising (TLIscaleA = 0.97, RSMEAscaleA = 0.055, TLIscaleB = 1.05, RMSEAscaleB = 0.00, TLIscaleC = 0.95, RMSEAscaleC = 0.074). The piloted version of scales A and C were positively correlated with subjective health literacy, health-related quality of life, and subjective health; however, we found no such correlations for scale B. The post-survey group interviews led to some adjustments in scales A and B. The revised version of CHLA-Q must be tested using a larger sample; this will enable more robust statistical testing of the properties of the items and the scale. View Full-Text
Keywords: critical health literacy; health literacy; adolescents; school; health education; lower secondary schools; health and life skills; well-being critical health literacy; health literacy; adolescents; school; health education; lower secondary schools; health and life skills; well-being
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Haugen, A.L.H.; Riiser, K.; Esser-Noethlichs, M.; Hatlevik, O.E. Developing Indicators to Measure Critical Health Literacy in the Context of Norwegian Lower Secondary Schools. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 3116. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19053116

AMA Style

Haugen ALH, Riiser K, Esser-Noethlichs M, Hatlevik OE. Developing Indicators to Measure Critical Health Literacy in the Context of Norwegian Lower Secondary Schools. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(5):3116. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19053116

Chicago/Turabian Style

Haugen, Anders L. Hage, Kirsti Riiser, Marc Esser-Noethlichs, and Ove Edvard Hatlevik. 2022. "Developing Indicators to Measure Critical Health Literacy in the Context of Norwegian Lower Secondary Schools" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 5: 3116. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19053116

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop