Next Article in Journal
Blood Culture Contamination: A Single General Hospital Experience of 2-Year Retrospective Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Clinical Use of Aligners Associated with Nuvola® OP System for Transverse Maxillary Deficiency: A Retrospective Study on 100 Patients
Previous Article in Journal
The Influence of Disease Status on Loneliness of the Elderly: Evidence from Rural China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Accuracy of Digital Dental Implants Impression Taking with Intraoral Scanners Compared with Conventional Impression Techniques: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies
 
 
Case Report
Peer-Review Record

Digitally Fabricated Dentures for Full Mouth Rehabilitation with Zirconia, Polyetheretherketone and Selective Laser Melted Ti-6Al-4V Material

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(5), 3021; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19053021
by Wei-Ting Lee 1 and Yung-Chung Chen 1,2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(5), 3021; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19053021
Submission received: 27 January 2022 / Revised: 24 February 2022 / Accepted: 2 March 2022 / Published: 4 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Digital Dentistry, Implantology and Maxillo-Facial Diseases)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Summary of manuscript: This manuscript reports the fabrication of the dentures with zirconia, polyeheretherketone and selective laser melted Ti-6Al-4Vmaterial. This report concludes that CAD/CAM technologies for applying PEEK frameworks of a telescopic denture and a RPD framework SLM with Ti-6Al-4V are suitable for framework fabrication.

 

General comments

 

  • There is no functional evaluation and aesthetic evaluation of the fabricated dentures.
  • There is no novelty about PEEK combined with zirconia as a telescopic crown material because some studies have been reported.
  • There are no photos of one year after wearing new dentures and is no current panoramic X-ray photograph.

Author Response

The response letter has been uploaded.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

- Please eliminate the subtitles in the abstract - Line 36: Co-Cr are never defined in the text, please do - Line 42: rigidly? you have to use another term i think
- Line 43-46 need a reference - Line 72: please add a space between "limited" and "[10-13]". - Lines 71-75: please add the clinical period to the aim of the study - Line 85: "periodontal treatment was completed", How?
- Please clarify the originality of this study in the introduction part
- Figure 1: not clear, more resolution is recommended
- Figure 2: please add (a) and (b) for the figure parts and explain the figure legend - What was the camera which was used to take the intraoral photos? please add in the material methods part - Line 108: please eliminate the space 1mm. The design
- Lines 109-110: please rephrase, not clear
-Line 117: drying after ethanol ? of waiting some min? - Line 117: Which kind of adhesive? universal? generation 7, please more details
- Line 134: please more info on oral hygiene instructions - Figure 5: same comment for figure 2 - Discussion well written, Line 221: please eliminate the space between [32]. and The reliable - Please add the limitation of this study at the end of discussion part
- Please follow MDPI style for all the references
- Please add Institutional Review Board Statement

Author Response

The response letter has been uploaded.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The authors describe the use of modern techniques and materials for the full rehabilitation of the oral cavity. It is especially important for practicing dentists because it shows new possibilities and technological solutions. The article is also interesting because of the growing number of elderly patients.

The prosthetic part of the case report is very carefully prepared. Each stage of the work is described in detail and well illustrated. However, I would like to ask you to complete the part concerning the stage of patient oral cavity preparation. The description should contain information about which teeth were qualified for extraction and for what reasons. Were the teeth intended under crowns endodontically treated? The authors only mention the end of periodontal treatment, what kind of treatment? There is also no information about patient recommendations for home hygiene procedures.

I believe that the article is suitable for publication after taking into account the above small corrections

Author Response

The response letter has been uploaded.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors made a good job

Back to TopTop