Digitized Prenatal Newsletter: Impact on Obstetric Patient Satisfaction and Loyalty
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
References
- Garrido Rubio, A.; Bordonaba Juste, M. Marketing de relaciones: Un nuevo paradigma? Relac. Lab. 2001, 9, 25–44. [Google Scholar]
- Corella, J.M. Introducción a la Gestión de Marketing en Los Servicios de Salud, 1st ed.; Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra; Gobierno de Navarra Departamento de Salud: Pamplona, España, 1999; pp. 215–216. [Google Scholar]
- Marketinet. Available online: https://www.marketinet.com/blog/tecnicas-marketing-digital-sector-sanitario#gref (accessed on 23 December 2021).
- Gordo, S. Marketing Digital y el Profesional Sanitario del Siglo XXI. Master’s Thesis, Universidad Oberta de Cataluña, Barcelona, Spain, 24 January 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Caballero Galilea, M.; Sainz de la Cuesta Abbad, R.; Fernández Gonzalo, J.C.; Martínez-Miguel, E.; Rubio Alonso, M. Fidelización y satisfacción de mujeres en la atención obstétrica. Rev. Tesela 2021, 28, e13030. [Google Scholar]
- Swensson, J.; Barclay, L.; Cooke, M. The concerns and interests of expectant and new parents: Assessing learning needs. J. Perinat. Educ. 2006, 15, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health. Antenatal Care: Routine Care for the Healthy Pregnant Woman, 2nd ed.; RCOG Press: London, UK, 2008; pp. 37–58. [Google Scholar]
- Kinnersley, P.; Edwards, A.; Hood, K.; Cadbury, N.; Ryan, R.; Prout, H.; Owen, D.; MacBeth, F.; Butow, P.; Butler, C. Interventions before consultations for helping patients address their information needs. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2007, 3, CD004565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Alcántara De Jesús, O.; Solano Solano, G.; Ramírez González, T.B.; Ramírez González, M.J.; Latorre Cervantes, S.; Ruvalcaba Ledezma, J.C. Impact of an educational intervention on pregnant women with respect to their selfcare. J. Negat. No. Posit. Results 2018, 3, 875–886. [Google Scholar]
- McMilllan, A.; Britain, G. Birth and Beyond: A Review of the Evidence about Antenatal Education. Available online: https://www.worldcat.org/title/birth-and-beyond-a-review-of-the-evidence-about-antenatal-education/oclc/651069777 (accessed on 23 February 2022).
- Lupton, D. The use and value of digital media for information about pregnancy and early motherhood: A focus group study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016, 16, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Smith, M.; Mitchell, A.S.; Townsend, M.L.; Herbert, J.S. The relationship between digital media use during pregnancy, maternal psychological wellbeing, and maternal-fetal attachment. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0243898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- World Health Organization. Classification of Digital Health Interventions v1.0: A Shared Language to Describe the Uses of Digital Technology for Health; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switerland, 2018; pp. 1–20. [Google Scholar]
- World Health Organization. WHO Guideline: Recommendations on Digital Interventions for Health System Strengthening; World Health Organization: Green Ink, UK, 2019; pp. 80–83. [Google Scholar]
- Haddad, S.M.; Souza, R.T.; Cecatti, J.G. Mobile technology in health mHealth and antenatal care–Searching for apps and available solutions: A systematic review. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2019, 127, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Commission. Summary Report on Public Consultation on the Green Paper on Mobile Health; European Commission eHealth: Brussels, Belgium, 2014; pp. 1–20. [Google Scholar]
- Martínez Galiano, J.; Delgado Rodríguez, M. Contribución de la educación maternal a la salud materno infantil. Revisión bibliográfica. Matronas Prof. 2014, 15, 137–141. [Google Scholar]
- Kamali, S.; Ahmadian, L.; Khajouei, R.; Bahaadinbeigy, K. Health information needs of pregnant women: Information sources, motives and barriers. Health Inf. Libr. J. 2018, 35, 24–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Australian Government Department of Health. Clinical Practice Guidelines: Pregnancy Care Guidel; Australian Government Department of Health: Canberra, Australia, 2019; pp. 49–65.
- Fernández Aranda, M. Las mujeres gestantes y el uso de internet como complemento informativo de su embarazo. Metas Enferm 2018, 21, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, N.; Deng, Z.; Wen, L.M.; Ding, Y.; He, G. Understanding the Use of Smartphone Apps for Health Information Among Pregnant Chinese Women: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR mHealth uHealth 2021, 7, e12631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Orozco Beltrán, D.; Carbonell, V.P.; Guillén, V.G.; Erades, I.P.; Montés, M.R.; Cánovas, P.M. Gestión clínica de la consulta: Previsibilidad y contenido clínico (estudio SyN-PC). Aten. Primaria 2004, 33, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marko, K.I.; Ganju, N.; Krapf, J.M.; Gaba, N.D.; Brown, J.A.; Benham, J.J.; Oh, J.; Richards, L.M.; Meltzer, A.C. Mobile Prenatal Care App to Reduce In-Person Visits: Prospective. JMIR mHealth uHealth 2019, 7, e10520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chatwin, J.; Butler, D.; Jones, J.; James, L.; Choucri, L.; McCarthy, R. Experiences of pregnant mothers using a social media based antenatal support service during the COVID-19 lockdown in the UK: Findings from a user survey. BMJ Open 2021, 11, e040649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Esteban-Gonzalo, S.; Caballero-Galilea, M.; González-Pascual, J.L.; Álvaro-Navidad, M.; Esteban-Gonzalo, L. Anxiety and Worries among Pregnant Women during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multilevel Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 6875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Corstjens, M.; Lal, R. Building store loyalty through store brands. J. Mark. Res. 2000, 37, 281–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pascual, C.P.; Pinedo, I.A.; Grandes, G.; Cifuentes, M.E.; Inda, I.G.; Gordon, J.P. Necesidades percibidas por las mujeres respecto a su maternidad. Estudio cualitativo para el rediseño de la educación maternal. Aten Primaria 2016, 48, 657–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Luyben, A.G. Women’s needs from antenatal care in three European countries. Midwifery 2005, 21, 212–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- World Health Organization. Global Strategy for Women’s, Children’s and Adolescents’ Health 2016–2030; WHO: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 17–21. [Google Scholar]
- Goetz, M.; Müller, M.; Matthies, L.M.; Hansen, J.; Doster, A.; Szabo, A.; Pauluschke-Fröhlich, J.; Abele, H.; Sohn, C.; Wallwiener, M.; et al. Perceptions of Patient Engagement Applications During Pregnancy: A Qualitative Assessment of the Patient’s Perspective. JMIR mHealth uHealth 2017, 5, E73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tripp, N.; Hainey, K.; Liu, A.; Poulton, A.; Peek, M.; Kim, J.; Nanan, R. An emerging model of maternity care: Smartphone, midwife, doctor? Women Birth 2014, 27, 64–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lupton, D. ‘It just gives me a bit of peace of mind’: Australian women’s use of digital media for pregnancy and early motherhood. Societies 2017, 7, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shroder, M.; Anders, S.H.; Dorst, M.; Jackson, G.P. Communication Technology Use and Preferences for Pregnant Women and Their Caregivers. AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc. 2018, 2018, 1515–1523. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Oscarsson, M.G.; Medin, E.; Holmström, I.; Lendahls, L. Using the internet as source of information during pregnancy-a descriptive cross-sectional study among fathers-to-be in Sweden. Midwifery 2018, 1, 146–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Muñoz-Serrano, M.; Uribe-Torres, C.; Hoga, L. Fathers prepared for and committed to their role as companions during the birth process. Aquichan 2018, 18, 415–425. [Google Scholar]
- Peláez Ramírez, H.; Gallego Rodríguez, I. Beneficios del acompañamiento a la mujer por parte de su pareja durante el embarazo, el parto y el puerperio en relación con el vínculo paternofilial. Matronas Prof. 2014, 15, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Purcarea, V. The impact of marketing strategies in healthcare systems. J. Med. Life 2019, 12, 93. [Google Scholar]
- Astuti, H.J.; Nagase, K. Patient loyalty to healthcare organizations: Relationship marketing and satisfaction. Int. J. Manag. Mark. Res. 2014, 7, 39–56. [Google Scholar]
- George, B.P.; Salgaonkar, P.B.; Pradeep, B. Inter-relationship among the extent of past consultations, recommendation, satisfaction, and loyalty in patient-doctor relationship: An empirical study. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2006, 16, 17–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bodet, G. Customer satisfaction and loyalty in service: Two concepts, four constructs, several relationships. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2008, 15, 156–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, W.J.; Wan, Q.Q.; Liu, C.Y.; Feng, X.L.; Shang, S.M. Determinants of patient loyalty to healthcare providers: An integrative review. Int. J. Qual. Health Care 2017, 29, 442–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Lee, S.; Lee, D.; Kang, C.Y. The impact of high-performance work systems in the health care industry: Employee reactions, service quality, customer satisfaction, and customer loyalty. Serv. Ind. J. 2012, 32, 17–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramli, A.H. Patient satisfaction, hospital image and patient loyalty in West Sulawesi Province. Bus. Entrep. Rev. 2019, 17, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fatima, T.; Malik, S.A.; Shabbir, A. Hospital healthcare service quality, patient satisfaction and loyalty: An investigation in context of private healthcare systems. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 2018, 35, 1195–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bergstrom, M.; Kieler, M.; Waldenström, U. Randomised controlled multicentre trial of women’s and men’s satisfaction with two models of antenatal education. Midwifery 2011, 27, e195–e200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Holroyd, E.; Twinn, S.; Yim, I. Chinese women’s perception of effectiveness of antenatal education. Brit. J. Midwifery 2011, 19, 92–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vargas-Porras, C.; Hernández-Molina, L.M.; de Molina-Fernández, M.I. Aspectos percibidos por las madres primerizas como favorecedores en la adopción de su nuevo rol. Rev. Cub. Salud Publica 2019, 46, 1–18. [Google Scholar]
- Pengetnze, Y.; Persaud, D.; Karam, A.; Wang, X. A novel evidence-based approach to digital outreach improves patient engagement and health outcomes in two distinct cohorts of medicaid patients. BMJ Open 2019, 8, 21–22. [Google Scholar]
Variables | n = 197 | % |
---|---|---|
Age | ||
20–29 | 10 | 5.10% |
30–35 | 87 | 44.2% |
36–40 | 64 | 32.5% |
>40 | 36 | 18.3% |
Population of residence | ||
Madrid City | 86 | 43.7% |
Other towns in the Autonomous Community | 101 | 51.3% |
Other Autonomous Community | 10 | 5.1% |
Educational level | ||
Basic training baccalaureate | 6 | 3.05% |
University or graduate studies | 191 | 97.0% |
Obstetric pattern | ||
Nulliparous | 133 | 67.5% |
Secundiparous | 55 | 27.9% |
Multiparous (2 children) | 9 | 4.6% |
Theme of the Newsletter | Satisfaction | Total | Secundiparous/Multiparous | Nulliparous | p | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | % | n | % | n | % | |||
Tests to be performed during pregnancy | NEUT_OR_UNSAT | 44 | 22.30% | 7 | 11.90% | 37 | 26.80% | 0.021 |
SAT_OR_VERYSAT | 153 | 77.70% | 52 | 88.10% | 101 | 73.20% | ||
Pregnancy healthcare | NEUT_OR_UNSAT | 49 | 24.90% | 11 | 18.60% | 38 | 27.50% | 0.186 |
SAT_OR_VERYSAT | 148 | 75.10% | 48 | 81.40% | 100 | 72.50% | ||
Pregnancy changes | NEUT_OR_UNSAT | 43 | 21.80% | 9 | 15.30% | 34 | 24.60% | 0.144 |
SAT_OR_VERYSAT | 154 | 78.20% | 50 | 84.70% | 104 | 75.40% | ||
Childbirth: symptoms, measures, labor process | NEUT_OR_UNSAT | 56 | 28.40% | 13 | 22.00% | 43 | 31.20% | 0.193 |
SAT_OR_VERYSAT | 141 | 71.60% | 46 | 78.00% | 95 | 68.80% | ||
Changes during pregnancy | NEUT_OR_UNSAT | 73 | 37.10% | 19 | 32.20% | 54 | 39.10% | 0.356 |
SAT_OR_VERYSAT | 124 | 62.90% | 40 | 67.80% | 84 | 60.90% | ||
Anesthesia | NEUT_OR_UNSAT | 78 | 39.60% | 22 | 37.30% | 56 | 40.60% | 0.357 |
SAT_OR_VERYSAT | 119 | 60.40% | 37 | 62.70% | 82 | 59.40% | ||
Breastfeeding | NEUT_OR_UNSAT | 86 | 43.70% | 19 | 32.20% | 67 | 48.60% | 0.665 |
SAT_OR_VERYSAT | 111 | 56.30% | 40 | 67.80% | 71 | 51.40% | ||
Facilities (neonatal and adult ICU) | NEUT_OR_UNSAT | 86 | 43.70% | 19 | 32.20% | 67 | 48.60% | 0.034 |
SAT_OR_VERYSAT | 111 | 56.30% | 40 | 67.80% | 71 | 51.40% | ||
Special services (High-risk unit and prenatal diagnosis) | NEUT_OR_UNSAT | 89 | 45.20% | 21 | 35.60% | 68 | 49.30% | 0.077 |
SAT_OR_VERYSAT | 108 | 54.80% | 38 | 64.40% | 70 | 50.70% |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Caballero-Galilea, M.; Martínez-Miguel, E.; Fernández Gonzalo, J.C.; Saiz de la Cuesta Abbad, R.; Rubio Alonso, M. Digitized Prenatal Newsletter: Impact on Obstetric Patient Satisfaction and Loyalty. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 2773. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19052773
Caballero-Galilea M, Martínez-Miguel E, Fernández Gonzalo JC, Saiz de la Cuesta Abbad R, Rubio Alonso M. Digitized Prenatal Newsletter: Impact on Obstetric Patient Satisfaction and Loyalty. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(5):2773. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19052773
Chicago/Turabian StyleCaballero-Galilea, María, Esther Martínez-Miguel, Juan Carlos Fernández Gonzalo, Ricardo Saiz de la Cuesta Abbad, and Margarita Rubio Alonso. 2022. "Digitized Prenatal Newsletter: Impact on Obstetric Patient Satisfaction and Loyalty" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 5: 2773. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19052773
APA StyleCaballero-Galilea, M., Martínez-Miguel, E., Fernández Gonzalo, J. C., Saiz de la Cuesta Abbad, R., & Rubio Alonso, M. (2022). Digitized Prenatal Newsletter: Impact on Obstetric Patient Satisfaction and Loyalty. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(5), 2773. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19052773