Next Article in Journal
Motives and Barriers to Exercise Training during Hospitalization in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study
Previous Article in Journal
Experiences of Women Who Refuse Recall for Further Investigation of Abnormal Screening Mammography: A Qualitative Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 19
Issue 3
10.3390/ijerph19031045
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Brief Report

Moderating Effect of Help-Seeking in the Relationship between Religiosity and Dispositional Gratitude among Polish Homeless Adults: A Brief Report

by
Małgorzata Szcześniak
*,
Katarzyna Szmuc
,
Barbara Tytonik
,
Anna Czaprowska
,
Mariia Ivanytska
and
Agnieszka Malinowska
Institute of Psychology, University of Szczecin, 71-017 Szczecin, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(3), 1045; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031045
Submission received: 21 December 2021 / Revised: 13 January 2022 / Accepted: 15 January 2022 / Published: 18 January 2022
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Although empirical reports draw attention to the pathological aspects of the functioning of the homeless, recent studies show the benefits related to the elevating roles of different positive phenomena in coping with difficulties for this group of people. The main goal was to verify whether there is a direct relationship between religiosity and gratitude among the homeless, and whether this association is moderated by the reported help-seeking since both religiosity and gratitude seem to play an important role in homeless people’s lives. In total, 189 homeless persons participated in the study. Their mean age was M = 56.55 (SD = 12.39; range = 27–86). Most respondents were men (n = 119; 63%). The Scale of Religious Attitude Intensity and the Gratitude Questionnaire were used. The outcomes presented a statistically significant positive correlation between religious attitude and gratitude (r = 0.326***, p = 0.001). Help-seeking played a moderatory role in this relationship. Therefore, it can be assumed that the relationship between religiosity attitude intensity and dispositional gratitude is stronger when homeless persons seek specific help from other people or institutions compared to when they do not look for assistance. Homeless people, overcoming their limitations by actively asking for help, can strengthen their bonds with God (faith, religiosity) and with others (dispositional gratitude).

1. Introduction

Homelessness is widely considered as an individual [1,2,3], social [3,4,5,6], economic [7,8], and political [9] problem that affects the functioning of both individuals and whole of societies. Gu et al. [10] report that more than 150 million people worldwide are homeless. A nationwide survey carried out in 2019 at the initiative of the Ministry of Family, Labor and Social Policy showed that there were 30,330 homeless people in Poland, of which 82.1% were men, 14.6% women and 3.3% children [11]. Most of them (24,323) were institutionalized and concentrated in urban regions [9].
There is not a universally recognized and consistent definition of homelessness [12,13,14]. In a narrow sense, a homeless person is regarded as “someone living on the streets without shelter” ([15], pp. 717–726) or having a primary nighttime residence provided by an institution that serves this purpose [16]. More broadly, people who do not live in conventional, adequate, or secure accommodation and who are without economic and social support are categorized as homeless. Edgar et al. [17] enumerated three domains of exclusion that characterized homeless persons. The physical domain concerned a suitable dwelling, the social domain involved privacy and maintaining social relations, and the legal domain pertained to legal title to private space.
Different studies [18,19,20,21,22,23,24] point to multiple causes of homelessness related mainly to socio-economic conditions (e.g., social policy, unemployment, debt), political components (e.g., cost-cutting in the welfare system, increased migration), social factors (e.g., loss of support of family or friends, domestic violence) and personal characteristics (e.g., cognitive disabilities, alcoholism and other forms of addiction, physical disabilities, poor health).
Although a significant portion of the literature and empirical reports draw attention to the pathological aspects of the functioning of the homeless [25], recent studies show the benefits related to the elevating roles of different positive phenomena in coping with difficulties for this group of people. For example, there is some evidence that helping the homeless to recognize their personal strengths [25,26] and respecting their dignity [27] may encourage them to get out of homelessness. Moreover, for some homeless people, verbalizing their own history, sharing difficulties and unpleasant emotions becomes a turning point in the further process of becoming independent [28]. Therefore, in light of the theoretical and practical potential in conducting research on such constructive aspects, we aimed to verify whether there is a direct relationship between religiosity and gratitude among homeless persons, and whether this association is moderated by the reported help-seeking. The rationale for selecting these specific variables was that both religiosity and gratitude seem to play an important role in homeless people’s lives.

1.1. Religiosity and Homelessness

Comprehensive research in the general population shows in large part that different dimensions of religiosity are associated with various facets of psychological well-being [29] although this relationship has also been found to not be always linear (higher religiosity → higher well-being) [30]. In several studies, trust in God [31], intrinsic religiosity [32], engagement in religious activities [33], religious meaning [34,35], and religious coping [36] are positively related to life satisfaction. Moreover, various researchers suggest that religiosity has a significant impact on gratitude. Prayer frequency [37], commitment to God [38], religious beliefs [39] and daily spiritual experiences [40] correlate positively with grateful dispositions.
However, little is known about religiosity [29,41,42] in the homeless population. Although Testoni et al. [43] point out that religiosity cannot be considered a factor preventative of addiction or suicidal thoughts and Longo et al. [44] suggest that religiosity may even play a harmful role and be a risk factor, some researchers [45,46,47] observe that participation in religious or spiritual practices may have an important positive effect on the lives of the homeless. At this point, it is important to mention that religiosity and spirituality, although closely related [48], are complex and distinct constructs [48,49,50]. Religiosity is typically considered a set of beliefs or rituals associated with participation in public settings [50] that allow proximity to a transcendent or theistic power [48]. In contrast, spirituality is conceptualized by some authors as a broader notion [51] that reflects the whole of the experiences and emotions connected to a personal search for comprehension, love, purpose, optimism, and self-fulfillment, and not to the adherence to community or religious practices [51]. Homeless people who declare higher levels of religiousness and spirituality or who attend religious services score lower on measures of suicidal ideation [52], have better mental health [53], feel they live a higher quality of life [54], present lower rates of substance abuse [46,55], are more resilient [56], hold low deviant beliefs [42], cope better with stress [57], adversity [58], and the strains resulting from homelessness [59,60] and are more likely to leave addiction behind [61]. Private and public forms of religiosity seem to give the homeless a sense of meaning [46] because the function of “meaning building” is generally assigned to religion [62]. Likewise, connectedness to the divine may provide them with other psychological benefits [45]. According to Szocik and Van Eyghen [35], religious beliefs provide sense and value to life. Many institutional shelters integrate religious practices into their programs to help the homeless handle their problems [63].

1.2. Gratitude and Homelessness

Nowadays, research on the topic of gratitude among the homeless is scarce. This may be due to the fact that a grateful disposition is difficult to preserve when one is deprived of basic needs [64] and does not have a safe place of refuge, family support or decent work [25]. Moreover, homeless persons are often perceived as “entitled rights-holders, not grateful supplicants” ([65], p. 805). They are widely considered a serious problem [5], a threat to the social order [66], passive and dependent [67] and suffering from the syndrome of learned helplessness [68].
However, some qualitative and quantitative studies report examples of gratitude among people experiencing homelessness. Motives for being appreciative and grateful are various: services and care provided for life-threatening illness [69,70], assistance [65] and time dedicated by the volunteers [71], support and help [72], a bed in a shelter [73], information and knowledge [74,75] and opportunities to learn [72]. Moxley and Washington [75] noted that some the homeless appreciate their experience of being without a home or economic security, regarding it as a personal journey. A recent study [76] conducted among youths living in emergency shelters showed that although they rarely reported gratitude in comparison to other VIA character strengths, they were grateful to the facilitators for their 10-week intervention. In another study, Rew and colleagues [77] acknowledged that gratitude together with hope and optimism explain life satisfaction, even after controlling for other variables. They also observed an inverse association between length of homelessness and gratitude. An interesting outcome was reported by Booth et al. [78]. In-depth interviews with charitable food services recipients showed that homeless people are grateful for any food but are dismayed when it is of poor quality (e.g., unhealthy) or lacks variety. In their exploratory study carried out with the participation of former runaway and homeless youths, Williams et al. [74] noted that these young people were grateful for gaining new knowledge thanks to their experiences, accepted healing relationships, found forgiveness and grew from “their brushes with death.” Lastly, people with histories of homelessness are grateful for safe homes [79].

1.3. Religiosity, Gratitude and Help-Seeking among the Homeless

As far as we know, no research into the relationship between religiosity and gratitude among the homeless has been carried out. However, there are some theoretical and empirical premises which make it possible to argue that such a relationship exists and may be moderated by the experience of seeking help. Some studies conducted among the general population present positive relationships between gratitude and having a religious orientation [80], conventional religious practices [81], spiritual self-transcendence [81], religious comfort [31], religious friends [82] and prayer [37].
According to Krause [83], religion may have a significant impact on feelings of gratitude. More specifically, it seems that believers both of monotheistic religions and Eastern traditions find numerous references in the scriptures and prayers to the necessity of being grateful [84,85]. For example, Judaism, Christianity, Islam, and Buddhism focus on gratitude as an important virtue which is a pathway to a good life [84,86]. Moreover, religion promotes gratefulness and other human virtues [87]. There is also some evidence that religious practices serve to express gratitude for life [88]. Emmons and Kneezel [81] observed that people who relied on God in difficult situations, whether trying to solve their problems themselves or entrusting them to God, tended to declare higher gratitude than people who did not count on divinity. Since homeless people resemble the general population as regards their religious beliefs [89] and religiosity is relevant to the well-being of the general population [29], it is possible to pursue similar kinds of research among the homeless.
With respect to both variables in the context of homelessness, religiosity and spirituality are considered by some homeless as sources of strength in their personal journeys which help them to understand, appreciate, and be grateful for their own life experiences [75]. Lovett and Weisz [61], after using qualitative interviews to analyze the role of religiosity in the functioning of homeless individuals, showed that building a positive relationship with God led to constructive changes in feelings of gratitude. Smith-Barusch ([90], p. 138) shed light on the influence of religiosity on disadvantaged women living in homeless shelters, reporting their gratitude for “life, good fortune, help in times of trouble, and material goods.” Moreover, God was considered by the participants of this study as the origin of all benefits.
According to Schieman and Bierman [91], religiosity through its “meaning-making function” has a positive impact on gratitude. Roemer [92] reported that in some cultures, gratitude has important value in religious services and rituals. These considerations bring an understanding of why homeless persons may experience gratitude. When people perceive their problems or life conditions as part of God’s project and see God as someone who wants to strengthen and help them grow, they more easily feel gratitude [93].
Another important aspect of the relationship between religiosity and gratitude among people experiencing homelessness may be the aspect of seeking help which consists of seeking assistance to solve a difficult situation or problem [94]. Krause [83] observed that there is a general belief that God helps people to overcome adversities by “using” the kindness and commitment of others. If religion assists people in their struggles with concrete forms of aid, they might be encouraged to ask for help and be grateful for the support received. In this context, the concept of “religious capital” seems important because it becomes a source of meaning when used in difficult situations [95]. Considering the current scientific achievements related to the subject of the homeless, their religiosity and gratitude, we assumed that:
Hypothesis 1 (H1).
A religious attitude correlates positively with gratitude among homeless persons.
Hypothesis 2 (H2).
The level of gratitude resulting from the intensity of religious attitude is significantly different at different levels of seeking help by homeless persons.
In this study, religious attitude was the variable X, dispositional gratitude was the variable Y and seeking help, W, was the moderator (Figure 1).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethics Approval

This research project was authorized by the Bioethics Committee of the Institute of Psychology at the University of Szczecin (KB 13/2021, 20 May 2021) and the procedure was implemented in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

2.2. Participants and Procedure

In total, 189 homeless persons participated in the study. Their mean age was M = 56.55 (SD = 12.39; range = 27–86). Most respondents were men (n = 119; 63%). As regards their level of education, 32% declared a primary school education, 39% a vocational school education, 24% a high school education and 5% a higher education. When asked about the length of time they were homeless, the participants responded in very different ways. Among them were those who became homeless in the month preceding the survey and also those who had lived in the shelter for 61 years. The mean duration of homelessness was M = 8.99 years (SD = 8.86). Among the most common causes of homelessness self-reported by the participants was: alcohol or drug abuse (42 respondents), being evicted (29), divorce (18), family disagreement (16), financial debts (16), domestic violence (9), own or family members’ illness (8), lack of work (7), failure to pay the rent (5), accident (4), prison (3), and gambling (2). Some of the participants pointed to several reasons and others refused to talk about the reasons for their predicaments. We did not have the opportunity to verify whether these causes were also related to mental disorders, although this cannot be excluded. It can be assumed that the real factors may also include some determinants that were not mentioned by the participants due to limited self-insight or shame.
The data collection procedure was carried out in nine centers where homeless people can stay overnight, have free meals, receive advice from a social worker, and consult a substance abuse counselor, therapist or psychologist: Caritas of the Archdiocese of Szczeciń-Kamień in Szczecin (31%), Accommodation of St. Brother Albert for homeless men in Gdańsk (27%), Accommodation of St. Brother Albert for homeless women in Wrocław (15%), Accommodation for Supporting the Needy “Przystań” for homeless men in Gdańsk (12%), Poviat Crisis Intervention Center in Słupia near Kępno (7%), “Street Church” Organization in Szczecin (3%), “New Beginning” Foundation in Szczecin (2%), Polish Red Cross–Regional branch in Kalisz (2%) and Religious Congregation of the Missionaries of Charity in Szczecin (1%). When asked whether the participants were looking for specific help from other people or institutions, a narrow majority responded in the affirmative (56%). The most frequently mentioned organization from which people sought help was the Municipal Family Assistance Center, a local government institution providing social assistance, operating in each commune. Homeless persons participated in the study through the “paper-and-pencil” form. To the question “What has been most difficult for you during the COVID-19 pandemic?” almost 50% of participants answered with isolation from people and loneliness. Other difficulties were related to the wearing of masks and the fear of infection and death.

2.3. Scale of Religious Attitude Intensity

The Scale of Religious Attitude Intensity developed by Prężyna and adapted by Śliwak and Bartczuk [96] measures the willingness of an individual to react positively or negatively toward a subject that has a religious character: God, Church understood as a religious institution, or the whole supernatural reality which can include faith in the action of grace or belief in angels, to name a few. Examples of statements relating to positive attitudes are: “Friendship with God is the greatest good that a person can achieve in life”; “The world without God is incomprehensible” and “Nothing happens in human life and human history without God’s will.” Examples of statements relating to negative attitudes are: “God is a fiction”; “People who accept supernatural reality are mindless” and “As science develops, all religions lose their raison d’être.” The scale contains 20 items, 10 of which are negatively formulated and need to be reversed. The participants were asked to rate their opinions on a 7–point Likert scale (1 = I strongly disagree; 2 = I disagree; 3 = I rather disagree; 4 = I can’t decide; 5 = I tend to agree; 6 = I agree; 7 = I strongly agree). The overall score was the sum of the points obtained by the person on the entire scale. A high score meant a high degree of intensity of religious attitude. The Scale of Religious Attitude Intensity has been corroborated in various former studies, showing its validity. For example, it correlated positively with the dimensions and the overall outcome of the Centrality of Religiosity Scale [97]. Moreover, in the previous analyses [98], the Cronbach α value was high, amounting to 0.95. In the current study, the reliability index was satisfactory and amounted to α = 0.81.

2.4. Gratitude Questionnaire

The Gratitude Questionnaire [99] adapted into Polish by Kossakowska and Kwiatek [100], assesses individual differences in the generalized tendency to experience gratitude. The questionnaire is a six-item self-report measure that reflects the four facets of gratitude: intensity, frequency, density, and duration. All of the items are rated on a seven-point scale (1 = strongly disagree; 2 = disagree; 3 = slightly disagree; 4 = neutral; 5 = slightly agree; 6 = agree; 7 = strongly agree). Items 3 (“When I look at the world, I don’t see much to be grateful for”) and 6 (“Long amounts of time can go by before I feel grateful to something or someone”) are reverse-scored. The remaining items are positively worded (e.g., “As I get older, I find myself more able to appreciate the people, events, and situations that have been part of my life history”). The scores range from 6 to 42, with a higher total meaning a higher level of gratitude. In the Polish research context, the Gratitude Questionnaire is well-known and usually shows the inner coherence at the level of Cronbach’s alpha starting from 0.67 [101], through 0.70 [102] to 0.78 [103]. The internal consistency of the whole scale was acceptable with α = 0.69.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were carried out using the SPSS software version 20 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Descriptive statistics for religiosity and gratitude were calculated. The variables were tested under the assumptions of a normal distribution. We adopted the principle of values for skewness between ±2 and for kurtosis between ±5 [104] as acceptable for approximately normal distributed variables. Pearson’s correlation was used to check the association between intensity of religious attitude and dispositional gratitude.
The G*Power analysis program in version 3.1.9.4 [105] was used a priori to determine the appropriate sample size for this study. The higher power criteria of 0.95 and a significance criterion α of 0.05 for the t-test to establish a small effect size (r = 0.25) were chosen. The G*Power analysis showed that a minimum sample size for the appointed criteria would require at least 164 respondents. The choice of a small effect was dictated by the fact that in many studies the correlation between various dimensions of religiosity and gratitude is relatively low and does not exceed or slightly exceeds r = 0.30. For example, Kraus et al. [82] showed that gratitude is positively associated with private devotion, religious salience and efficacy between r = 0.18** and r = 0.19**. Yost-Dubrow and Dunham [106] reported a modest positive correlation between both variables. Watkins et al. [107] observed a positive relationship between gratitude and intrinsic religiosity (r = 0.32**) and a negative relationship between gratitude and extrinsic religiosity (r = −0.28*).
A linear regression model was used to adjust for potential confounders including sex, age, and the length of time of homelessness. There is some evidence that women and men differ with respect to their attitudes toward religiosity, gratitude, and homelessness. Many authors consistently find that on average women score higher on the measures of religious dimensions compared to men [108,109,110]. Likewise, women generally tend to report higher feelings of gratitude and express more gratitude than men [111,112]. In respect to homelessness, the “typical” profile of a homeless person in most countries is a man between 30 and 50 years of age [113,114]. In Poland, this is also the case [115]. With respect to age, older people are commonly more religious in comparison to younger adults [116,117,118]. With respect to gratitude, research yields mixed evidence [119]. In some studies, gratitude remains relatively stable across a life span [119,120]. However, other studies emphasize that there are some changes in gratitude in a life span [121]. For example, other authors [119,122] showed that younger people express gratitude differently to older people, showing lower levels of expressing gratitude than seniors.
The moderating effect was tested using the PROCESS macro (version 3.2) and Model no. 1 [123].

3. Results

3.1. Preliminary Analyses

Religious attitude intensity and dispositional gratitude were screened for skewness and kurtosis to assess the normality of the scales’ distribution. None of them exceeded the values of ±2 for skewness and ±5 for kurtosis (Table 1).

3.2. Correlations

The results of the linear relationship between paired variables using Pearson’s r coefficient presented a statistically significant positive correlation between religious attitude intensity and dispositional gratitude r = 0.326***, p = 0.001. Thus, H1 was confirmed.

3.3. Multicollinearity and Confounding Variables

The multiple linear regression showed that there was no problem with collinearity for the sample’s data since the range of VIF values was between 1.010 and 1.052, and the tolerance values were between 0.950 and 0.990. The Mahalanobis distance indicated no presence of outliers. Cook’s values were well below 1, with the range between 0.000 and 0.060. The results showed that sex (β = −0.062; t = −0.864; p = 0.389), age (β = 0.066; t = 0.925; p = 0.356), and the length of time of homelessness (β = −0.061; t = −0.852; p = 0.396) were not relevant confounders since they accounted for only 1.3% of the variance (R2 = 0.013; β = 0.112; t = 0.781; p = 0.506). The intensity of religious attitude explained an additional 9% of the variance.

3.4. Moderation

The results of the moderation analysis obtained through the procedure of the bias-corrected bootstrapping method [123] with 95% for the confidence interval from 5000 resamples showed good fit to the data (F(3, 185) = 8.81, p < 0.001). The model explained 12% of the variance of the dispositional gratitude (R2 = 0.12).
The regression between religious attitude intensity and dispositional gratitude was statistically significant with the values of b = 0.28, t(185) = 3.45, p < 0.001, 95% CI [0.1208;0.4430]. Moreover, the regression for the total interaction coefficient of the model tested was statistically significant with b = −0.12, t(185) = −2.22, p < 0.05, 95% CI [−0.2217;−0.0131]. The outcomes (Figure 2) displayed that the moderation effect was significant only for the condition of seeking help (YES) with b = 0.16, t(185) = 4.57, p < 0.001, 95% CI [0.0936;0.2356] and not for the condition of not seeking help (NO) with b = 0.04, t(185) = 1.21, p = 0.22, 95% CI [−0.0291;0.1236].
Therefore, it can be assumed that the relationship between religious attitude intensity and dispositional gratitude is stronger when homeless persons seek specific help from other people or institutions compared to when they do not look for assistance.

4. Discussion

The first aim of the current study was to provide support for the hypothesis that religious attitude positively correlates with dispositional gratitude among homeless persons (H1). The second aim was to answer the hypothesis that the level of gratitude resulting from intensity of religious attitude is significantly different at different levels of seeking help by homeless persons (H2). Both hypotheses were confirmed.
Regarding the first hypothesis, although it might be expected that people with a hard life experience [124] have scarce occasions to be grateful, they actually still find reasons to be grateful, such as simply being alive or being sheltered. Moreover, although society is not accustomed to think about the function of religion in the lives of homeless persons [125], it seems that sometimes these people find their strength in God or divinity [126]. Smith-Barusch [90] reported that the dominant topics among most homeless persons are religious experiences and expressions of gratitude. In narratives from the streets, Phillips [127] described examples of homeless people who appreciated the smallest gifts which reduced their levels of anxiety. These persons acknowledged their vulnerability and spoke of being highly grateful. Jindra et al. [63] drew attention to the fact that both religion and gratitude are integral components of how people who struggle deal with their problems. This is because both religiosity and gratitude help in self-transcending and opening oneself to the divine or to other people. Furthermore, an important aspect that emerged from this study is that the level of religiosity and gratitude of the homeless, although lower than that normally found in the general population, was higher than the average attainable on both scales. Such a result may mean that, despite the difficulties of being deprived of a home and family relationships, homeless people have a certain intensity of religious attitudes and disposition for gratitude that help them cope with their life conditions.
With respect to the second hypothesis, our findings bring some new insights into the knowledge about the relationship between religiosity and gratitude, showing that this association can be more intense when homeless people seek help than when they do not look for assistance. Although there are not specific studies on this topic, we can assume that religiosity, gratitude, and asking for help share some characteristics. First, coping is the first common denominator of all three variables. Help-seeking in distressing or stigmatized circumstances is recognized as an adaptive form of coping and a protective factor [94,128]. Similarly, religiosity [129,130] and gratitude [131] are widely recognized as those human experiences that are associated with more active coping strategies. Second, the sense of reliance is another aspect that connects religiosity, gratitude, and seeking help. Religious reality, as well as gratitude and seeking help remind us that people live in a world of mutual connections in which they not only give, but also receive. Therefore, the homeless who look for help must overcome the stigma and shame related to their precarious conditions [132]. They also demonstrate their ability to deal with problems despite difficult circumstances. Such behavior may indicate that homeless people who ask for help do not want to be left alone, count on support of the divine or others, and may indicate that they depend on them. These individuals who engage in looking for assistance may do so because they draw strength from a religious foundation. Third, the reciprocal nature of the interpersonal relationships that connect religiosity, gratitude, and seeking help requires admitting dependence and vulnerability. Asking for help involves some level of vulnerability/sensitivity [133] which, in turn, is needed in experiencing and expressing gratitude and religiosity. In fact, Solomon [134], p. V) acknowledges that being grateful “involves an admission of our vulnerability and our dependence on other people.” At the same time, awareness of vulnerability is connected with taking care of each other [135]. Therefore, the association between religious attitude and gratitude may be more intense when homeless persons admit to being in need and find in themselves the strength to seek help. Conversely, those homeless who do not look for help may think that they can manage on their own, or do not want to depend on others or change anything in their lives. Nadler ([136], p. 382) sees in the decision to not seek help resignation and the choice to “live with the problem.” In such a situation, there is little room for being reliant on Another–understood as God or a higher power–or on other people.

5. Limitations

It is important to address some limitations of our study. The first is the lack of information on the churchgoing practices and the affiliation of the homeless who we met to a particular religion and the degree to which they identified with a given religion or ideology. Moreover, most of the literature on the relationship between religiosity and health or well-being is conducted from a Christian perspective. It is very likely that among the surveyed homeless, most of them were in some way related to the Christian faith due to its leading role in Poland and to the aid institutions run by the Catholic Church, the help of which these homeless people benefited from. Therefore, this aspect does not allow strong conclusions about the relation between religiosity and gratitude in general but only for the relation between Christian beliefs and grateful disposition. However, even if the homeless participants adhered to a faith other than Christianity, it can still be assumed that their belonging to any other faith may strengthen their gratitude. This is in line with previous research showing that adherence to both Abrahamic faiths [137,138,139] and Eastern religions can be related to gratitude [51,140,141]. Another aspect worth mentioning is testing for specific addictions or ascertaining the level of mental health. In future studies, taking these factors into account would be important for measuring potential confounding variables.

6. Conclusions

The results of this study indicate that the effort to ask for assistance is not without significance for the relationship between the religiosity and gratitude of homeless persons. The outcomes also show that homeless people, overcoming their limitations by actively asking for help, can strengthen their bonds with God (faith, religiosity) and with others (dispositional gratitude).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.S. and B.T.; methodology, M.S., K.S., B.T. and A.C.; formal analysis, M.S., K.S., B.T., A.C., M.I. and A.M.; investigation, K.S., B.T., A.C. and M.I.; resources, M.S., K.S., B.T., A.C., M.I. and A.M.; data curation, M.S.; writing—original draft preparation, M.S., K.S., B.T., A.C., M.I. and A.M.; writing—review and editing, M.S., K.S., B.T., A.C., M.I. and A.M.; supervision, M.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received funding from the University of Szczecin. Grant competition was carried out by the Student Council of the University of Szczecin in connection with the project # USzczęśliwiaj: N3/2021.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The protocol was approved by the Bioethics Committee of the Institute of Psychology at the University of Szczecin (KB 13/2021) and the research was conducted following the Declaration of Helsinki guidelines.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all participants involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used during this study are available from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all homeless persons who participated in the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors report no conflict of interest in this work.

References

  1. Fitzpatrick, S. Explaining homelessness: A critical realist perspective. Hous. Theory Soc. 2005, 22, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Schields, T.G. Network new construction of homelessness: 1980–1993. Commun. Rev. 2001, 4, 193–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cronley, C. Unraveling the Social Construction of Homelessness. J. Hum. Behav. Soc. Environ. 2010, 20, 319–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Turnbull, J.; Muckle, W.; Masters, C. Homelessness and health. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2007, 177, 1065–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Best, R. Situation or Social Problem: The Influence of Events on Media Coverage of Homelessness. Soc. Probl. 2010, 57, 74–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mejia-Lancheros, C.; Woodhall-Melnik, J.; Wang, R.; Hwang, S.W.; Stergiopoulos, V.; Durbin, A. Associations of resilience with quality of life levels in adults experiencing homelessness and mental illness: A longitudinal study. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2021, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Bullen, J. Governing Homelessness: The Discursive and Institutional Construction of Homelessness in Australia. Hous. Theory Soc. 2015, 32, 218–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Gubits, D.; Shinn, M.; Wood, M.; Brown, S.R.; Dastrup, S.R.; Bell, S.H. What Interventions Work Best for Families who Experience Homelessness? Impact Estimates from the Family Options Study. J. Policy Anal. Manag. 2018, 37, 735–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Burak, A.; Ferenc, A. Defining and measuring of homelessness. Poland. Probl. Polityki Społ. 2021, 52, 24–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gu, M.; Lu, C.J.; Lee, T.S.; Chen, M.; Liu, C.K.; Chen, C.L. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Metabolic Syndrome among the Homeless in Taipei City: A Cross-Sectional Study. Int J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 1716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pokonać Bezdomność–Program Pomocy Osobom Bezdomnym. Available online: https://www.gov.pl/web/rodzina/pokonac-bezdomnosc-program-pomocy-osobom-bezdomnym-edycja-2021 (accessed on 21 December 2021).
  12. Frankish, C.J.; Hwang, S.W.; Quantz, D. Homelessness and health in Canada: Research lessons and priorities. Can. J. Public Health 2005, 96, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rokach, A. Private lives in public places: Loneliness of the homeless. Soc. Indic. Res. 2005, 72, 99–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fleury, M.J.; Grenier, G.; Sabetti, J.; Bertrand, K.; Clement, M.; Brochu, S. Met and unmet needs of homeless individuals at different stages of housing reintegration: A mixed-method investigation. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0245088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Neate, S.L.; Philips, G.A. The challenging patient. In Textbook of Adult Emergency Medicine; Cameron, P., Jelinek, G., Kelly, A.M., Brown, A., Little, M., Eds.; Churchill Livingstone: Edinburgh, Scottish, 2015; pp. 717–726. [Google Scholar]
  16. Trawver, K.R.; Oby, S.; Kominkiewicz, L.; Kominkiewicz, F.B.; Whittington, K. Homelessness in America: An Overview. In Homelessness Prevention and Intervention in Social Work. Policies, Programs, and Practices; Larkin, H., Aykanian, A., Streeter, C.L., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  17. Edgar, B.; Meert, H.; Doherty, J. Third Review of Statistics on Homelessness in Europe. Developing an Operational Definition of Homelessness; Feantsa: Brussel, Belgium, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  18. Shlay, A.B.; Rossi, P.H. Social Science Research and Contemporary Studies of Homelessness. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 1992, 18, 129–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Crane, M.; Byrne, K.; Fu, R.; Lipmann, B.; Mirabelli, F.; Rota-Bartelink, A.; Ryan, M.; Shea, R.; Watt, H.; Warnes, A.M. The Causes of Homelessness in Later Life: Findings From a 3-Nation Study. J. Gerontol. 2005, 60, 152–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Shinn, M. International Homelessness: Policy, Socio-Cultural, and Individual Perspectives. J. Soc. Issues 2007, 63, 657–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nishio, A.; Horita, R.; Sado, T.; Mizutani, S.; Watanabe, T.; Uehara, R.; Yamamoto, M. Causes of homelessness prevalence: Relationship between homelessness and disability. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2017, 71, 180–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Otto, D.; Lynch, P. Housing, homelessness and human rights. Aust. J. Hum. Rights 2004, 10, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Testoni, I.; Russotto, S.; Zamperini, A.; De Leo, D. Addiction and religiosity in facing suicide: A qualitative study on meaning of life and death among homeless people. Ment. Illness 2018, 10, 7420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Peterie, M.; Bielefeld, S.; Marston, G.; Mendes, P.; Humpage, L. Compulsory income management: Combatting or compounding the underlying causes of homelessness? Aust. J. Soc. Issues 2019, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tweed, R.G.; Biswas-Diener, R.; Lehman, D.R. Self-perceived strengths among people who are homeless. J. Posit. Psychol. 2012, 7, 481–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Rew, L.; Horner, S.D. Personal Strengths of Homeless Adolescents Living in a High-Risk Environment. Adv. Nurs. Sci. 2003, 26, 90–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Klop, H.T.; Evenblij, K.; Gootjes, J.R.G.; de Veer, A.J.E.; Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B.D. Care avoidance among homeless people and access to care: An interview study among spiritual caregivers, street pastors, homeless outreach workers and formerly homeless people. BMC Public Health 2018, 18, 1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Pilarz, K.; Huzarek, T.; Tykarski, S. Tożsamość Zagubiona: Oblicza Bezdomności XXI Wieku; Wydawnictwo Bernardinum: Pelplin, Poland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  29. Fitzpatrick, K.M. Circumstances, Religiosity/Spirituality, Resources and Mental Health Outcomes Among Homeless Adults in Northwest Arkansas. Psychol. Relig. Spirit. 2018, 10, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Galen, L.W.; Kloet, J.D. Mental Well-Being in the Religious and the Non-Religious: Evidence for a Curvilinear Relationship. Ment. Health Relig. Cult. 2011, 14, 673–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Szcześniak, M.; Bielecka, G.; Bajkowska, I.; Czaprowska, A.; Madej, D. Religious/Spiritual Struggles and Life Satisfaction among Young Roman Catholics: The Meditating Role of Gratitude. Religions 2019, 10, 395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Fernándes, M.B.; Rosell, J. An Analysis of the Relationship Between Religiosity and Psychological Well-Being in Chilean Older People Using Structural Equation Modeling. J. Relig. Health 2021, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jocson, R.M.; Garcia, A.S. Religiosity and spirituality among Filipino mothers and father: Relations to psychological well-being and parenting. J. Fam. Psychol. 2021, 35, 801–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Krok, D. The Religious Meaning System and Subjective Well-Being: The Mediational Perspective of Meaning in Life. Arch. Psychol. Relig. 2014, 36, 253–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Szocik, K.; Van Eyghen, H. Revising Cognitive and Evolutionary Science of religion: Religion as an Adaptation; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  36. Jackson, B.R.; Bergeman, C. How Does Religiosity Enhance Well-Being? The Role of Perceived Control. Psychol. Relig. Spiritual. 2011, 3, 149–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Lambert, N.M.; Fincham, F.D.; Braithwaite, S.R.; Graham, S.M.; Beach, S.R.H. Can Prayer Increase Gratitude? Psychol. Relig. Spiritual. 2009, 1, 139–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Tulbure, B.T. Appreciating the Positive Protects us from Negative Emotions: The Relationship between Gratitude, Depression and Religiosity. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2015, 187, 475–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Lee, J.; Kim, J. Korean Christian Young Adults’ Religiosity Affects Post-Traumatic Growth: The Mediation Effects of Forgiveness and Gratitude. J. Relig. Health 2021, 60, 3967–3977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rounding, K.; Hart, K.E.; Hibbard, S.; Carroll, M. Emotional Resilience in Young Adults Who Were Reared by Depressed Parents: The Moderating Effects of Offspring Religiosity/Spirituality. J. Spiritual Ment. Health 2011, 13, 236–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Snodgrass, J.L. Spirituality and Homelessness: Implications for Pastoral Counseling. Pastoral Psychol. 2014, 63, 307–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tyler, K.A.; Kort-Butler, L.A.; Swendener, A. The Effect of Victimization, Mental Health, and Protective Factors on Crime and Illicit Drug Use Among Homeless Young Adults. J. Interpers. Violence 2014, 29, 348–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Testoni, I.; Russotto, S.; Zamperini, A.; Pompele, S.; De Leo, D. Neither God nor others: A qualitative study of strategies for avoiding suicide among homeless people. Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 2020, 42, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Longo, J.; Walls, E.; Wisneski, H. Religion and religiosity: Protective or harmful factors for sexual minority youth? Ment. Health Relig. Cult. 2013, 16, 273–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ferguson, K.M.; Wu, Q.; Dyrness, G.; Spruijt-Metz, D. Perceptions of Faith and Outcomes in Faith-Based Programs for Homeless Youth: A Grounded Theory Approach. J. Soc. Serv. Res. 2007, 33, 25–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Fowler, P.J.; Ahmed, S.R.; Tompsett, C.J.; Jozefowicz-Simbeni, D.M.H.; Toro, P.A. Community violence and externalizing problems: Moderating effects of race and religiosity in emerging adulthood. J. Community Psychol. 2008, 36, 835–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Wendt, D.C.; Collins, S.E.; Nelson, L.A.; Serafini, K.; Clifasefi, S.L.; Donovan, D.M. Religious and Spiritual Practices Among Homeless Urban American Indians and Alaska Natives with Severe Alcohol Problems. Am. Indian Alsk. Native Ment. Health Res. 2017, 24, 39–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Baumsteiger, R.; Chenneville, T. Challenges to the Conceptualization and Measurement of Religiosity and Spirituality in Mental Health Research. J. Relig. Health 2015, 54, 2344–2354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Villani, D.; Sorgente, A.; Iannello, P.; Antonietti, A. The Role of Spirituality and Religiosity in Subjective Well-Being of Individuals with Different Religious Status. Front Psychol. 2019, 10, 1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Mahoney, A.; Pargament, K.I.; Jewell, T.; Swank, A.B.; Scott, E.; Emery, E.; Rye, M. Marriage and the Spiritual Realm: The Role of Proximal and Distal Religious Constructs in Marital Functioning. J. Fam. Psychol. 1999, 13, 321–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chaiwutikornwanich, A. Belief in the Afterlife, Death Anxiety, and Life Satisfaction of Buddhists and Christians in Thailand: Comparison between Different Religiosity. Soc. Indic. Res. 2014, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Vitorino, L.M.; Possetti, J.G.; Silva, M.T.; Santos, G.S.; Lucchetti, G.; Moreira-Almeida, A.; Guimaraes, M.V.C. The role of spirituality and religiosity on suicidal ideation of homeless people in a large Brazilian urban center. J. Affect. Disord. 2021, 295, 930–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Tsai, J.; Rosenheck, R.A. Religiosity Among Adults who are Chronically Homeless: Association with Clinical and Psychosocial Outcomes. Psychiatr. Serv. 2011, 62, 1222–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Tsai, J.; Rosenheck, R.A.; Kasprow, W.J.; McGuire, J.F. Do Faith-Based Residential Care Services Affect the Religious Faith and Clinical Outcomes of Homeless Veterans? Community Ment. Health J. 2011, 48, 682–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Torchalla, I.; Li, K.; Strehlau, V.; Linden, I.A.; Krausz, M. Religious Participation and Substance Use Behaviors in a Canadian Sample of Homeless People. Community Ment. Health J. 2014, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Walsh, C.A.; Gulbrandsen, C.L. Spirituality as Strength: Reflections of Homeless Women in Canada. Int. J. Relig. Spiritual Soc. 2014, 3, 97–112. [Google Scholar]
  57. Hodge, D.R.; Moser, S.E.; Shafer, M. Spirituality and Mental Health among Homeless Mothers. Soc. Work Res. 2013, 36, 245–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lewinson, T.; Hurt, K.; Hughes, A.K. “I Overcame That with God’s Hand on Me”: Religion and Spirituality Among Older Adults to Cope with Stressful Life Situations. J. Relig. Spiritual Soc. Work. Soc. Thought. 2015, 34, 285–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Meadows-Oliver, M. Homeless Adolescent Mothers: A Metasynthesis of Their Life Experiences. J. Pediatr. Nurs. 2006, 21, 340–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Asante, K.O. Factors that Promote Resilience in Homeless Children and Adolescents in Ghana: A Qualitative Study. Behav Sci. 2019, 9, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Lovett, K.L.; Weisz, C. Religion and Recovery Among Individuals Experiencing Homelessness. J. Relig. Health 2020, 60, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Oviedo, L. Meaning and Religion: Exploring Mutual Implications. Sci. Fides 2019, 7, 25–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Jindra, I.W.; Jindra, M.; DeGenero, S. Contrasts in Religion, Community, and Structure at Three Homeless Shelters: Changing Lives; Routledge: Great Britain, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  64. Scranton, C.J. Relationship Between Horizontal Gratitude, Vertical Gratitude, Subjective Well-Being, and Spiritual Well-Being in the Sheltered Homeless. 2017. Available online: https://www.proquest.com/openview/946b0be95c9089a0b0d198cf8aadb4e8/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y (accessed on 21 December 2021).
  65. Watts, B. Homelessness, Empowerment and Self-reliance in Scotland and Ireland: The Impact of Legal Rights to Housing for Homeless People. J. Soc. Policy 2014, 43, 793–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Belcher, J.R.; DeForge, B.R. Social Stigma and Homelessness: The Limits of Social Change. J. Hum. Behav. Soc. Environ. 2012, 22, 929–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Crystal, S. Homeless Men and Homeless Women: The Gender Gap. Urban Soc. Change Rev. 1984, 17, 2–6. [Google Scholar]
  68. Piechowicz, M.; Piotrowski, A.; Pastwa-Wojciechowska, B. The Social Rehabilitation of Homeless Women with Children. Acta Neuropsychol. 2014, 14, 469–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Vance, D.E. A Portrait of Older Homeless Men: Identifying Hopelessness and Adaptation. J. Soc. Distress Homeless 1995, 4, 57–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Sturman, N.; Matheson, D. ‘I just hope they take it seriously’: Homeless men talk about their health care. Aust. Health Rev. 2020, 44, 748–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Piraino, A.; Krema, G.; Williams, S.M.; Ferrari, J.R. “Hour of HOPE”: A Spiritual Prayer Program for Homeless Adults. Univers. J. Psychol. 2014, 2, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hudson, A.L.; Nyamathi, A.; Greengold, B.; Slagle, A.; Koniak-Griffin, D.; Khalilifard, F.; Getzoff, D. Health-Seeking Challenges Among Homeless Youth. Nurs. Res. 2010, 59, 212–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Collier, R. Bringing palliative care to the homeless. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2011, 183, 316–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Williams, N.R.; Lindsey, E.W.; Kurtz, P.D.; Jarvis, S. From Trauma to Resiliency: Lessons from former runaway and homeless youth. J. Youth Stud. 2001, 4, 233–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Moxley, D.P.; Washington, O.G.M. Souls in Extremis: Enacting Processes of Recovery from Homelessness Among Older African American Women. J. Relig. Health 2016, 55, 1038–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Cooley, S.J.; Quinton, M.L.; Holland, M.J.G.; Parry, B.J.; Cumming, J. The Experiences of Homeless Youth When Using Strengths Profiling to Identify Their Character Strengths. Front. Psychol. 2019, 10, 2036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Rew, L.; Slesnick, N.; Johnson, K.; Aguilar, R.; Cengiz, A. Positive attributes and life satisfaction in homeless youth. Child Youth Serv. Rev. 2019, 100, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Booth, S.; Begley, A.; Mackintosh, B.; Kerr, D.A.; Jancey, J.; Caraher, M.; Whelan, J.; Pollard, C.M. Gratitude, resignation and desire for dignity: Lived experience of food charity recipients and their recommendations for improvement, Perth, Western Australia. Public Health Nutr. 2018, 21, 2831–2841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Burns, V.F.; St-Denis, N.; Walsh, C.A.; Hewson, J. Creating a Sense of Place after Homelessness: We Are Not “Ready for the Shelf”. J. Aging Environ. 2020, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Aghababaei, N.; Błachnio, A.; Aminikhoo, M. The relations of gratitude to religiosity, well-being, and personality. Ment. Health Relig. Cult. 2018, 21, 408–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Emmons, R.A.; Kneezel, T.T. Giving Thanks: Spiritual and Religious Correlates of Gratitude. J. Psychol. Christ. 2005, 24, 140–148. [Google Scholar]
  82. Kraus, R.; Desmond, S.A.; Palmer, Z.D. Being Thankful: Examining the Relationship Between Young Adult Religiosity and Gratitude. J. Relig. Health 2014, 54, 1331–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Krause, N. Religious Involvement, Gratitude, and Change in Depressive Symptoms Over Time. Int. J. Psychol. Relig. 2009, 19, 155–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Emmons, R.A.; Crumpler, C.A. Gratitude as a Human Strength: Appraising the Evidence. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 2000, 19, 56–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Emmons, R.A. The Psychology of Gratitude: An Introduction. In The Psychology of Gratitude; Emmons, R.A., McCullough, M.E., Eds.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2004; pp. 3–16. [Google Scholar]
  86. Wood, A.; Joseph, S.; Linley, A. Gratitude – Parent of All Virtues. Psychologist 2007, 20, 18–21. [Google Scholar]
  87. Koenig, H.G. Religion, Spirituality, and Health: The Research and Clinical Implications. ISRN Psychiatry 2012, 8, 278730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Malin, H.; Liauw, I.; Damon, W. Purpose and Character Development in Early Adolescence. J. Youth Adolesc. 2017, 46, 1200–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Sager, R.; Stephens, L.S. Clients’ Reactions to Religious Elements at Congregation-Run Feeding Establishments. Nonprofit Volunt. Sec. Q. 2005, 34, 297–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Smith-Barusch, A. Religion, Adversity and Age: Religious Experiences of Low-Income Elderly Women. J. Sociol. Soc. Welf. 1999, 26, 125–142. [Google Scholar]
  91. Schieman, S.; Bierman, A. The Role of Divine Beliefs in Stress Processes. In Toward a Sociological Theory of Religion and Health; Blasi, A., Ed.; Brill: Leiden, The Netherlands, 2011; p. 45. [Google Scholar]
  92. Roemer, M.K. Religion and Health in Japan: Past Research, New Findings, and Future Directions. In Toward a Sociological Theory of Religion and Health; Blasi, A., Ed.; Brill: Leiden, The Netherlands, 2011; p. 115. [Google Scholar]
  93. Krause, N. Stress, Religious-based Coping, and Physical Health. In Toward a Sociological Theory of Religion and Health; Blasi, A., Ed.; Brill: Leiden, The Netherlands, 2011; p. 207. [Google Scholar]
  94. Rickwood, D.; Thomas, K. Conceptual measurement framework for help-seeking for mental health problems. Psychol. Res. Behav. Manag. 2012, 5, 173–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Seryczyńska, B.; Oviedo, L.; Roszak, P.; Saarelainen, S.M.K.; Inkilä, H.; Torralba Albaladejo, J.; Anthony, F.V. Religious Capital as a Central Factor in Coping with the COVID-19: Clues from an International Survey. Eur. J. Sci. Theol. 2021, 17, 43–56. [Google Scholar]
  96. Śliwak, J.; Bartczuk, R. Skala Intensywności Postawy Religijnej. In Psychologiczny Pomiar Religijności; Jarosz, M., Ed.; Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL: Lublin, Poland, 2011; pp. 153–168. [Google Scholar]
  97. Huber, S.; Huber, O.W. The Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS). Religions 2012, 3, 710–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Szcześniak, M.; Światek, A.H.; Świątek, M.A.; Rodzeń, W. Positive Downstream Indirect Reciprocity Scale (PoDIRS-6): Construction and Psychometric Characteristics. Curr. Psychol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. McCullough, M.E.; Emmons, R.A.; Tsang, J. The grateful disposition: A conceptual and empirical topography. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2002, 82, 112–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Kossakowska, M.; Kwiatek, M. Polska adaptacja kwestionariusza do badania wdzięczności GQ-6. Przegląd Psychol. 2014, 57, 503–514. [Google Scholar]
  101. Szcześniak, M.; Soares, E. Are Proneness to Forgive, Optimism and Gratitude Associated with Life Satisfaction? Pol. Psychol. Bull. 2011, 42, 20–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Tomaszek, K.; Lasota, A. Gratitude and Its Measurement—The Polish adaptation of the Grat – R Questionnaire. Czas. Psychol. 2018, 24, 251–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Przepiorka, A.; Sobol-Kwapinska, M. People with Positive Time Perspective are More Grateful and Happier: Gratitude Mediates the relationship Between Time Perspective and Life Satisfaction. J. Happiness Stud. 2021, 22, 113–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Bachman, L.F. Statistical Analyses for Language Assessment; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  105. Faul, F.; Erdfelder, E.; Lang, A.G.; Buchner, A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Method. 2007, 39, 175–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Yost-Dubrow, R.; Dunham, Y. Evidence for a relationship between trait gratitude and prosocial behaviour. Cogn. Emot. 2017, 32, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Watkins, P.C.; Woodward, K.; Stone, T.; Kolts, R.L. Gratitude and happiness: Development of a measure of gratitude, and relationships with subjective well-being. Soc. Behav. Pers. 2003, 31, 431–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Loewenthal, K.M.; MacLeod, A.K.; Cinnirella, M. Are women more religious than men? Gender differences in religious activity among different religious groups in the UK. Pers. Individ. Differ. 2002, 32, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Collett, J.L.; Lizardo, O. A Power-Control Theory of Gender and Religiosity. J. Sci. Study Relig. 2009, 48, 213–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Schnabel, L. The Gender Pray Gap: Wage Labor and the Religiosity of High-Earning Women and Men. Gend. Soc. 2016, 30, 643–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Kashdan, T.B.; Mishra, A.; Breen, W.E.; Froh, J.J. Gender Differences in Gratitude: Examining Appraisals, Narratives, the Willingness to Express Emotions, and Changes in Psychological Needs. J. Pers. 2009, 77, 691–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Algoe, S.B.; Gable, S.L.; Maisel, N.C. It’s the little things: Everyday gratitude as a booster shot for romantic relationships. Pers. Relatsh. 2010, 17, 217–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Tessler, R.; Rosenheck, R.; Gamache, G. Gender Differences in Self-Reported Reasons for Homelessness. J. Soc. Distress Homeless 2001, 10, 243–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Montgomery, A.E.; Szymkowiak, D.; Culhane, D. Gender Differences in Factors Associated with Unsheltered Status and Increased Risk of Premature Mortality among Individuals Experiencing Homelessness. Women’s Health Issues 2017, 27, 256–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Sidor, M.; Abdelhafez, D. NGO-Public Administration Relationships in Tackling the Homelessness Problem in the Czech Republic and Poland. Adm. Sci. 2021, 11, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Wilkes, R.E.; Burnett, J.J.; Howell, R.D. On the meaning and measurement of religiosity in consumer research. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 1986, 14, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Bergan, A.; McConatha, J.T. Religiosity and Life Satisfaction. Act. Adapt. Aging 2012, 24, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Stearns, M.; Nadorff, D.K.; Lantz, E.D.; McKay, I.T. Religiosity and depressive symptoms in older adults compared to younger adults: Moderating by age. J. Affect. Disord. 2018, 238, 522–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Chopik, W.J.; Newton, N.J.; Ryan, L.H.; Kashdan, T.B.; Jarden, A.J. Gratitude across the life span: Age differences and links to subjective well-being. J. Posit. Psychol. 2019, 14, 292–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Allemand, M.; Hill, P.L. Gratitude from Early Adulthood to Old Age. J. Pers. 2014, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Naito, T.; Washizu, N. Gratitude in Life-span Development: An Overview of Comparative Studies between Different Age Groups. J. Behav. Sci. 2019, 14, 80–93. [Google Scholar]
  122. Tudge, J.R.H.; Freitas, L.B.L.; Mokrova, I.L.; Wang, Y.C.; O’Biren, M. The Wishes and Expression of Gratitude of Youth. Paideia 2015, 25, 281–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Hayes, A.F. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach; Guilford: New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  124. Fallot, R.D. Spirituality in Trauma Recovery for People with Severe Mental Disorders. In Sexual Abuse in the Lives of Women Diagnosed with Serious Mental Illness; Harris, M., Landis, C.L., Eds.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2016; p. 337. [Google Scholar]
  125. Jasiński, J.L.; Wesely, J.K.; Wright, J.D.; Mustaine, E.E. Hard Lives, Mean Streets. Violence in the Lives of Homeless Women; University Press of New England: Lebanon, NH, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  126. Mendez, L.M.R.; Dickinson, S.; Esposito, E.; Connolly, J.; Bonilla, L. Common Themes in the Life Stories of Unaccompanied Homeless Youth in High School: Implications for Educators. Contemp. School Psychol. 2017, 22, 332–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Phillips, J.D. Homeless. Narratives from the Streets; McFarland and Company: Jefferson, NC, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  128. Pretorius, C.; Chambers, D.; Cowan, B.; Coyle, D. Young People Seeking Help Online for Mental Health: Cross-Sectional Survey Study. JMIR Ment. Health 2019, 26, e13524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Pargament, K.I.; Park, C.L. Merely a Defense? The Variety of Religious Means and Ends. J. Soc. Issues 1995, 51, 13–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Holland, J.C.; Passik, S.; Kash, K.M.; Russak, S.M.; Gronert, M.K.; Sison, A.; Lederberg, M.; Fox, B.; Baider, L. The Role of religious and Spiritual Beliefs in Coping with Malignant Melanoma. Psycho-Oncology 1999, 8, 14–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Lin, C.C.; Yeh, Y.C. How Gratitude Influences Well-Being: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Soc. Indic. Res. 2014, 118, 205–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Lens, V.; Nugent, M.; Wimer, C. Asking for Help: A Qualitative Study of Barriers to Help Seeking in the Private Sector. J. Cos. Soc. Work Res. 2018, 9, 107–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Amabile, T.; Fisher, C.M.; Pillemer, J. IDEO’s Culture of Helping: By making collaborative generosity the norm, the design firm has unleashed its creativity. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2014, 92, 54–61. [Google Scholar]
  134. Solomon, R.C. Foreword. In The Psychology of Gratitude; Emmons, R.A., McCullough, M.E., Eds.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2004; pp. V–XI. [Google Scholar]
  135. Fernández, B.L.; Rueda, J. In Defense of Posthuman Vulnerability. Sci. Fides 2021, 9, 215–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Nadler, A. Personality and Help Seeking: Autonomous versus Dependent Seeking of Help. In Sourcebook of Social Support and Personality; Pierce, G.R., Lakey, B., Sarason, I.G., Sarason, B.R., Eds.; Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA, 1997; pp. 379–407. [Google Scholar]
  137. Ali, S.A.; Ahmed, M.; Bhatti, O.K.; Farooq, W. Gratitude and Its Conceptualization: An Islamic Perspective. J. Relig. Health 2020, 59, 1740–1753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Krause, N.; Emmons, R.A.; Ironson, G. Benevolent Images of God, Gratitude, and Physical Health Status. J. Relig. Health 2015, 54, 1503–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Krause, N.; Hayward, R.D. Humility, Compassion, and Gratitude to God: Assessing the Relationships Among Key Religious Virtues. Psycholog. Relig. Spiritual. 2015, 7, 192–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Saha, A.K. Promoting Intrinsic Religiosity in Minority-Majority Relationships for Healthy Democratic Life. J. Psychosoc. Res. 2014, 9, 237–245. [Google Scholar]
  141. Fincham, F.D.; May, R.W. Generalized Gratitude and Prayers of Gratitude in Marriage. J. Posit. Psychol. 2020, 16, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijerph 19 01045 g001 550
Figure 1. Conceptual model with a single moderator.
Figure 1. Conceptual model with a single moderator.
Ijerph 19 01045 g001
Ijerph 19 01045 g002 550
Figure 2. Plot of the slope analysis for the moderating effect of seeking help in the relationship of religiosity and gratitude among homeless people.
Figure 2. Plot of the slope analysis for the moderating effect of seeking help in the relationship of religiosity and gratitude among homeless people.
Ijerph 19 01045 g002
Table
Table 1. Descriptive statistics for the Scale of Religious Attitude Intensity and the Gratitude Questionnaire (N = 189).
Table 1. Descriptive statistics for the Scale of Religious Attitude Intensity and the Gratitude Questionnaire (N = 189).
ScalesMSDSkewnessKurtosis
Religious Attitude Intensity78.2618.54−0.827−0.731
Dispositional Gratitude26.287.022.3590.799
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Szcześniak, M.; Szmuc, K.; Tytonik, B.; Czaprowska, A.; Ivanytska, M.; Malinowska, A. Moderating Effect of Help-Seeking in the Relationship between Religiosity and Dispositional Gratitude among Polish Homeless Adults: A Brief Report. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 1045. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031045

AMA Style

Szcześniak M, Szmuc K, Tytonik B, Czaprowska A, Ivanytska M, Malinowska A. Moderating Effect of Help-Seeking in the Relationship between Religiosity and Dispositional Gratitude among Polish Homeless Adults: A Brief Report. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(3):1045. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031045

Chicago/Turabian Style

Szcześniak, Małgorzata, Katarzyna Szmuc, Barbara Tytonik, Anna Czaprowska, Mariia Ivanytska, and Agnieszka Malinowska. 2022. "Moderating Effect of Help-Seeking in the Relationship between Religiosity and Dispositional Gratitude among Polish Homeless Adults: A Brief Report" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 3: 1045. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031045

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop