Next Article in Journal
Chemical Composition of Atmospheric Air in Nemoral Scots Pine Forests and Submountainous Beech Forests: The Potential Region for the Introduction of Forest Therapy
Next Article in Special Issue
Psychosocial Problems and Condomless Anal Sex among Transgender Women in Two Cities of China: Study Based on the Syndemic Framework
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of a Structured Multicomponent Physical Exercise Intervention on Quality of Life and Biopsychosocial Health among Chilean Older Adults from the Community with Controlled Multimorbidity: A Pre–Post Design
Previous Article in Special Issue
Meanings and Practices in Intercultural Health for International Migrants
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 19
Issue 23
10.3390/ijerph192315843
Review Report
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Systematic Review
Peer-Review Record

LGBTIQ CALD People’s Experiences of Intimate Partner Violence: A Systematic Literature Review

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(23), 15843; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315843
by Alex Workman 1,*, Erin Kruger 2, Sowbhagya Micheal 3,4 and Tinashe Dune 4
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Murad Hossain
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(23), 15843; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315843
Submission received: 12 August 2022 / Revised: 18 November 2022 / Accepted: 19 November 2022 / Published: 28 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Addressing Public Health and Health Inequities in Marginalized and Hidden Populations)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

dear authors, I read your work and it seemed too long and dispersed. Your aim is not clear or I am not sure if you have achieved it with this systematic review of the literature. I invite you to rewrite it and make it more usable. dear authors, I read your work and it seemed excessively long and dispersed. Your goal is not clear or I am not sure if you have achieved it with this systematic review of the literature. I invite you to rewrite it and make it more understandable . furthermore I would like to point out to specify at the beginning of the text what CALD people means.

Author Response

Dear reviewer. 

 

Thank you for your comments, I have made adjustments according to your feedback. In which CALD has been addressed and defined, and the article's aim has been refined and the article has been revised with some text deleted which meets the journal requirements for standard submissions of a systematic review.

 

Regards

Reviewer 2 Report

Major comments:

  1. In the abstract, it is necessary to more clarification on lacking’s existed in the recent cited study. And what kind of extra scientific significance exists in their articles compared to existing research?
  2. In the introduction part, the authors need to include the most recent studies such as for the years 2022 and 2021.
  3. According to the research questions, the authors need to show relevance in the findings section more clearly.
  4. In the methods they have included only studies for the USA, Are there any specific reasons? Need to clarify it.
  5. It is necessary to rearrange the Discussion and conclusion part briefly with a more logical sequence according to their objective and chronological order.
  6. It is not clear to me how this research may be helpful for the scientific community for future research.

Minor Comments:

1. Need to update the problem of solving grammatical issues such as articles, Voice, prepositions, and some sentence patterns.

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

Thank you for your feedback and recommendations, please see below:

In the abstract, it is necessary to more clarification on lacking’s existed in the recent cited study. And what kind of extra scientific significance exists in their articles compared to existing research?

 

Addressed.

In the introduction part, the authors need to include the most recent studies such as for the years 2022 and 2021.

 

Addressed. Please note there is not a significant body of evidence that focuses on the LGBTIQ community.

According to the research questions, the authors need to show relevance in the findings section more clearly.

 

Q. 1 is addressed in theme 1: Intimate Partner Violence as Experienced by LGBTIQ Survivors 

Q. 2 is addressed in themes: Marginalised LGBTIQ Identity as Experienced by Intimate Partner Violence Survivors and Types of Survivorship as Experienced by LGBTIQ Survivors

Q. 3 is address in theme: Types of Survivorship as Experienced by LGBTIQ Survivors

A statement has been added to clarify this point.

 

It is necessary to rearrange the Discussion and conclusion part briefly with a more logical sequence according to their objective and chronological order.

 

A sentence has been added to address this as the reason this is broken down is due to the socioecological theory that guides this paper. Please note this is highlighted in green.

In the methods they have included only studies for the USA, Are there any specific reasons? Need to clarify it.

 

This was discussed/addressed in the limitations section.

It is not clear to me how this research may be helpful for the scientific community for future research.

 

Addressed in discussion and conclusion.

Need to update the problem of solving grammatical issues such as articles, Voice, prepositions, and some sentence patterns.

Addressed throughout.

Thank you.

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Thank you all authors for updating the articles according to the given comments in the first review.

Author Response

Thank you for your comments.

Back to TopTop