Next Article in Journal
Advances in Population-Based Healthcare Research: From Measures to Evidence
Next Article in Special Issue
Simulation on the Permeability Evaluation of a Hybrid Liner for the Prevention of Contaminant Diffusion in Soils Contaminated with Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of Nurses’ Attitudes toward Patient Death
Previous Article in Special Issue
New Evidence of Semi-Mangrove Plant Barringtonia racemosa in Soil Clean-Up: Tolerance and Absorption of Lead and Cadmium
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Application for Ecological Restoration of Contaminated Soil: Phytoremediation

1
College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Central South University of Forestry & Technology, Changsha 410004, China
2
PowerChina Zhongnan Engineering Corporation Limited, Changsha 410004, China
3
College of Geography and Environmental Science, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(20), 13124; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013124
Submission received: 30 September 2022 / Accepted: 8 October 2022 / Published: 12 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ecological Restoration of Contaminated Soil)
Nowadays, with the rapid development of industry and agriculture, heavy metal pollution is becoming more and more serious, mainly deriving from natural and man-made sources [1,2,3]. Natural sources include volcanic eruptions, forest fires, fossil fuels, etc., while human sources include agricultural fertilizer, mining, smelting plants, etc. [4,5]. Metal from natural sources does little harm to the ecological environment, and the heavy metal pollution produced artificially is particularly serious [6,7,8]. Almost all countries in the world are affected by heavy metal pollution [9,10]. It is reported that there are more than ten million polluted areas in the world, of which more than 50% are affected by heavy metal pollution [10]. In the United States, there are about 600,000 sites polluted by heavy metals, and 1.4 million sites are affected by heavy metals in Western Europe [11,12,13]. One-sixth of China’s cultivated land is polluted by heavy metal, and more than 40% of the cultivated land is degraded to varying degrees due to erosion and desertification. Heavy metals affect the composition, structure, function, biomass and diversity of soil microbial communities [14,15,16,17]. Additionally, they can enter the human body after the biological amplification of the food chain, thereby endangering human health [18]. The long-term consumption of food contaminated by heavy metals will lead to mutations in human genes and metabolic enzymes [19], increase the incidence of diseases in the esophagus, blood, kidney, nervous system, cardio cerebrovascular and urinary system, and induce cancer, organ failure, etc. [20,21]. Compared with organic pollutants [22,23,24,25,26], heavy metals are not easily biodegraded and can persist in nature for more than 20 years, leading to the continuous accumulation of heavy metals in the environment, posing a serious threat to human and ecological security [27,28]. Therefore, the treatment of heavy metal-contaminated soil is extremely urgent.
The remediation methods of heavy metal-contaminated soil mainly include physical remediation, chemical remediation and biological remediation [29]. Physical remediation methods include soil replacement, vitrification, solidification, etc. Physical remediation methods have the advantages of wide application, thoroughness and efficiency, but there are shortcomings such as requiring a large amount of work, damage to soil structure, high cost, high energy consumption, etc. [30,31,32]. Chemical remediation mainly includes oxidation, reduction, adsorption, precipitation, polymerization, complexation, etc. It has the advantages of a short cycle and can be used to treat various pollutants, but chemical remediation produces secondary pollutants, disturbs the physical and chemical properties of soil, and changes the original microbial community [33,34,35,36]. Bioremediation includes microbial remediation, animal remediation and phytoremediation [37,38,39,40]. Microbial remediation has the advantages of low cost and little disturbance to the soil, but it is only applicable to the soil polluted by low concentrations of heavy metal and vulnerable to environmental impact [41]. Animal remediation methods can improve soil and enhance soil fertility, but animals that accumulate a large amount of heavy metals in their bodies will continue to migrate, and so they need to be properly disposed of [42]. The above methods have achieved some promising results. However, based on the obvious shortcomings, it is difficult to scale up their application. Therefore, it is extremely important to develop sustainable heavy metal soil remediation technology.
In recent years, phytoremediation has been widely studied as an economic, effective and green technology. Phytoremediation has become a research hotspot since Chaney et al. proposed using hyperaccumulative plants to restore heavy metal-contaminated soil [43,44]. Phytoremediation is a green, economic and environmental remediation technology for heavy metal-contaminated soil, which uses the absorption, volatilization, transformation and degradation of plants (“hyperaccumulator”) with strong enrichment capacity for heavy metals and their rhizosphere microbial system to absorb or stabilize heavy metals in soil [45,46,47,48]. The principle of phytoremediation mainly includes plant extraction, plant volatilization, plant stability, plant degradation, etc. [6,49,50,51,52]. Plant extraction refers to using technology that uses plant roots to absorb heavy metals from the soil and transfer and accumulate them to aboveground plants (buds, leaves, etc.). Plant extraction is divided into natural plant extraction technology and chemically induced plant extraction technology [45,53]. Compared with other phytoremediation technologies, it is more suitable for commercial applications [54]. Plant volatilization is closely related to plant absorption. The principle of plant volatilization technology is that plants use root exudates or rhizosphere microorganisms to absorb and accumulate pollutants in the soil, transform them into less toxic and volatile forms, and finally release them into the atmosphere through plant transpiration. At present, plant volatilization technology is used primarily to restore the soil polluted by Hg, Se and As [45]. Plant stability, also known as plant fixation, mainly refers to the accumulation, adsorption and precipitation of heavy metals in the soil by plant roots, thus reducing their mobility and bioavailability and limiting their leaching into groundwater and the food chain [55,56,57,58,59]. Another function of plant stability is to reduce soil erosion. Plant stabilization technology is widely used to restore abandoned mining areas polluted by Zn, Pb, Cd, Mn, Cu, Cr, Fe, As, Ni and other metals, and plants have specificity for the stability of these metals [45,50,51,56]. For instance, reed and cattail stabilize As and Hg, and have little effect on other metals [60]. Plant degradation, also known as plant transformation, is based on the principle that plants degrade or transform pollutants into an environmentally friendly state through root exudates. Plant degradation mainly targets the most complex organic molecules and a few heavy metal pollutants [6].
The efficiency of the phytoremediation of heavy metal-contaminated soil mainly depends on plant biomass and its ability to accumulate heavy metals [61,62]. However, wild hyperaccumulators generally have the defects of a long growth cycle and small biomass, and the types, forms and contents of heavy metals in soil will affect the tolerance and remediation efficiency of plants, which seriously restricts the application of phytoremediation technology in the remediation of heavy metal-contaminated soil [61]. In addition, it is unlikely that a single piece of phytoremediation technology will restore heavy metal-contaminated soil on its own, so it needs to be combined with other remediation technologies, such as microbial phytoremediation technology, chemical phytoremediation technology, physically assisted phytoremediation technology, etc. [63,64,65,66,67,68]. Soil microorganisms often co-exist with plants. The nutrient-rich exudates in the rhizosphere of plants can promote the growth of microbial communities. Microbes can provide an ideal soil environment for plants, enhance plant resistance, assist plants to absorb water and minerals from the soil, stimulate plants to secrete hormones, and shorten the plant growth cycle [54,63,69]. Chemical methods combined with phytoremediation mainly use chemical reagents to assist plants to extract heavy metals from soil or enhance the stability of some plants to heavy metals [64,65,66]. Phytoremediation assisted by physical methods can remedy the limitations of phytoremediation. For instance, the combination of electric restores and phytoremediation is one of the most commonly used methods [67,68].
Soil heavy metal pollution is a major problem worldwide. Compared with physical and chemical remediation methods, phytoremediation is a mild, relatively cheap and ecologically safe technology with huge potential. Looking forward, the following points deserve more attention: (1) Using molecular biology and transgenic engineering technology, we should screen and cultivate local genetic engineering bacteria and genetic engineering plants under heavy metal stress, and transfer target functional genes to plants, so as to improve the relevant remediation capacity of heavy metal-contaminated environments and reduce the disturbance to the contaminated soil ecosystem. (2) There is little concern about the remediation of heavy metal-contaminated soil under organic compound pollution, and the phytoremediation technology of organic–inorganic compound pollutants will be a hotspot in the future. (3) We need to find more efficient and safer microbial plants, chemical plants and other joint remediation technologies. (4) More and more attention will be given to the woody plant remediation technology with large biomass, great economic value and environmental value. (5) The application of artificial intelligence and machine learning for the environment will be more and more prevalent. Artificial intelligence and machine learning have huge application prospects in the research of heavy metal pollution remediation through plants, gene improvement and site remediation. (6) In future research, the medium scale remediation test of actual heavy metal pollution should carry out site construction to accelerate the transition of phytoremediation technology from a simulation experiment to practical application.
This Special Issue was created to promote researchers in this field, presenting their thoughts, ideas, and discoveries of phytoremediation in environmental applications. Thank you to everyone who wants to or can contribute to this Special Issue.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, R.S.; reading and collecting, R.S.; discussion, R.S. and Y.W.; design, R.S. Writing—review and editing, R.S., Y.W., S.H., R.C. and J.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Nature Science Foundation of China, grant number 52000183, Key Project of Scientific Research Project of Hunan Provincial Department of Education [20A523], Central South University of Forestry and Technology Introduced Talent Research Startup Fund [2020YJ010].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abdelkrim, S.; Jebara, S.H.; Saadani, O.; Chiboub, M.; Abid, G.; Mannai, K.; Jebara, M. Heavy metal accumulation in Lathyrus sativus growing in contaminated soils and identification of symbiotic resistant bacteria. Arch. Microbiol. 2019, 201, 107–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Yang, Q.; Li, Z.; Lu, X.; Duan, Q.; Huang, L.; Bi, J. A review of soil heavy metal pollution from industrial and agricultural regions in China: Pollution and risk assessment. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 642, 690–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zheng, H.; Ren, Q.; Zheng, K.; Qin, Z.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y. Spatial distribution and risk assessment of metal(loid)s in marine sediments in the Arctic Ocean and Bering Sea. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2022, 179, 113729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Cui, Y.B.; Bai, L.; Li, C.H.; He, Z.J.; Liu, X.R. Assessment of heavy metal contamination levels and health risks in environmental media in the northeast region. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2022, 80, 103796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yang, L.; Ren, Q.; Ge, S.; Jiao, Z.; Zhan, W.; Hou, R.; Ruan, X.; Pan, Y.; Wang, Y. Metal(loid)s spatial distribution, accumulation, and potential health risk assessment in soil-wheat systems near a Pb/Zn smelter in henan province, central china. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 2527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Tangahu, B.V.; Sheikh Abdullah, S.R.; Basri, H.; Idris, M.; Anuar, N.; Mukhlisin, M. A review on heavy metals (As, Pb, and Hg) uptake by plants through phytoremediation. Int. J. Chem. Eng. 2011, 2011, 939161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, Q.; Xie, Z.; Li, F. Using ensemble models to identify and apportion heavy metal pollution sources in agricultural soils on a local scale. Environ. Pollut. 2015, 206, 227–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, R.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, H.; Yue, W.; Teng, Y. Source apportionment of heavy metals in sediments and soils in an interconnected river-soil system based on a composite fingerprint screening approach. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 411, 125125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Baldantoni, D.; Morra, L.; Zaccardelli, M.; Alfani, A. Cadmium accumulation in leaves of leafy vegetables. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2016, 123, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ko, M.-S.; Kim, J.-Y.; Park, H.-S.; Kim, K.-W. Field assessment of arsenic immobilization in soil amended with iron rich acid mine drainage sludge. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 108, 1073–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. McGrath, S.P.; Zhao, F.J.; Lombi, E. Plant and rhizosphere processes involved in phytoremediation of metal-contaminated soils. Plant Soil 2001, 232, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gade, L.H. Highly Polar Metal-Metal Bonds in “Early-Late” Heterodimetallic Complexes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2000, 39, 2658–2678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ragnarsdottir, K.; Hawkins, D. Trace metals in soils and their relationship with scrapie occurrance. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2005, 69, 196. [Google Scholar]
  14. Jaishankar, M.; Tseten, T.; Anbalagan, N.; Mathew, B.B.; Beeregowda, K.N. Toxicity, mechanism and health effects of some heavy metals. Interdiscip. Toxicol. 2014, 7, 60–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Lopez, S.; Piutti, S.; Vallance, J.; Morel, J.-L.; Echevarria, G.; Benizri, E. Nickel drives bacterial community diversity in the rhizosphere of the hyperaccumulator Alyssum murale. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2017, 114, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wu, W.; Dong, C.; Wu, J.; Liu, X.; Wu, Y.; Chen, X.; Yu, S. Ecological effects of soil properties and metal concentrations on the composition and diversity of microbial communities associated with land use patterns in an electronic waste recycling region. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 601–602, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Moreira, H.; Pereira, S.I.A.; Marques, A.P.G.C.; Rangel, A.O.S.S.; Castro, P.M.L. Effects of soil sterilization and metal spiking in plant growth promoting rhizobacteria selection for phytotechnology purposes. Geoderma 2019, 334, 72–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chang, C.; Yin, R.; Zhang, H.; Yao, L. Bioaccumulation and health risk assessment of heavy metals in the soil-rice system in a typical seleniferous area in central china. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2019, 38, 1577–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sharma, A.; Nagpal, A.K. Soil amendments: A tool to reduce heavy metal uptake in crops for production of safe food. Rev. Environ. Sci. Bio/Technol. 2018, 17, 187–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lin, Y.-C.; Hsu, S.-C.; Chou, C.C.K.; Zhang, R.; Wu, Y.; Kao, S.-J.; Luo, L.; Huang, C.-H.; Lin, S.-H.; Huang, Y.-T. Wintertime haze deterioration in Beijing by industrial pollution deduced from trace metal fingerprints and enhanced health risk by heavy metals. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 208, 284–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sall, M.L.; Diaw, A.K.D.; Gningue-Sall, D.; Efremova Aaron, S.; Aaron, J.-J. Toxic heavy metals: Impact on the environment and human health, and treatment with conducting organic polymers, a review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2020, 27, 29927–29942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Su, R.; Chai, L.; Tang, C.; Li, B.; Yang, Z. Comparison of the degradation of molecular and ionic ibuprofen in a UV/H2O2 system. Water Sci. Technol. 2018, 77, 2174–2183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Luo, Y.; Su, R.; Yao, H.; Zhang, A.; Xiang, S.; Huang, L. Degradation of trimethoprim by sulfate radical-based advanced oxidation processes: Kinetics, mechanisms, and effects of natural water matrices. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2021, 28, 62572–62582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Su, R.; Dai, X.; Wang, H.; Wang, Z.; Li, Z.; Chen, Y.; Luo, Y.; Ouyang, D. Metronidazole degradation by UV and UV/H2O2 advanced oxidation processes: Kinetics, mechanisms, and effects of natural water matrices. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 12354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chirakkara, R.A.; Reddy, K.R.; Cameselle, C. Electrokinetic amendment in phytoremediation of mixed contaminated soil. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 181, 179–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Su, R.; Zhang, H.; Chen, F.; Wang, Z.; Huang, L. Applications of single atom catalysts for environmental management. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 11155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Huang, Y.; Zhou, B.; Li, N.; Li, Y.; Han, R.; Qi, J.; Lu, X.; Li, S.; Feng, C.; Liang, S. Spatial-temporal analysis of selected industrial aquatic heavy metal pollution in China. J. Clean Prod. 2019, 238, 117944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Su, R.; Xie, C.; Alhassan, S.I.; Huang, S.; Chen, R.; Xiang, S.; Wang, Z.; Huang, L. Oxygen reduction reaction in the field of water environment for application of nanomaterials. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Song, P.; Xu, D.; Yue, J.; Ma, Y.; Dong, S.; Feng, J. Recent advances in soil remediation technology for heavy metal contaminated sites: A critical review. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 838, 156417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yadav, K.K.; Gupta, N.; Kumar, V.; Singh, J.K. Bioremediation of heavy metals from contaminated sites using potential species: A review. Indian J. Environ. Prot. 2017, 37, 65. [Google Scholar]
  31. Yadav, K.; Singh, J.; Gupta, N.; Kumar, V. A review of nanobioremediation technologies for environmental cleanup: A novel biological approach. J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 2017, 8, 740–757. [Google Scholar]
  32. Jadhav, S.V.; Bringas, E.; Yadav, G.D.; Rathod, V.K.; Ortiz, I.; Marathe, K.V. Arsenic and fluoride contaminated groundwaters: A review of current technologies for contaminants removal. J. Environ. Manag. 2015, 162, 306–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kurniawan, T.A.; Chan, G.Y.; Lo, W.-H.; Babel, S. Physico–chemical treatment techniques for wastewater laden with heavy metals. Chem. Eng. J. 2006, 118, 83–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Barakat, M. New trends in removing heavy metals from industrial wastewater. Arab. J. Chem. 2011, 4, 361–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Zhang, M.; Wang, X.; Yang, L.; Chu, Y. Research on progress in combined remediation technologies of heavy metal polluted sediment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 5098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Gholizadeh, M.; Hu, X. Removal of heavy metals from soil with biochar composite: A critical review of the mechanism. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. He, L.; Su, R.; Chen, Y.; Zeng, P.; Du, L.; Cai, B.; Zhang, A.; Zhu, H. Integration of manganese accumulation, subcellular distribution, chemical forms, and physiological responses to understand manganese tolerance in Macleaya cordata. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2022, 29, 39017–39026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Han, L.; Chen, Y.; Chen, M.; Wu, Y.; Su, R.; Du, L.; Liu, Z. Mushroom residue modification enhances phytoremediation potential of Paulownia fortunei to lead-zinc slag. Chemosphere 2020, 253, 126774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ye, S.; Zeng, G.; Wu, H.; Zhang, C.; Dai, J.; Liang, J.; Yu, J.; Ren, X.; Yi, H.; Cheng, M.; et al. Biological technologies for the remediation of co-contaminated soil. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2017, 37, 1062–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Su, R.; Ou, Q.; Wang, H.; Luo, Y.; Dai, X.; Wang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Shi, L. Comparison of phytoremediation potential of Nerium indicum with inorganic modifier calcium carbonate and organic modifier mushroom residue to lead-zinc tailings. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 10353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, H.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, X.; Li, Q.; Cheng, C.; Shen, H.; Zhang, Z. Bioelectrochemical remediation of Cr(VI)/Cd(II)-contaminated soil in bipolar membrane microbial fuel cells. Environ. Res. 2020, 186, 109582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Dhaliwal, S.S.; Singh, J.; Taneja, P.K.; Mandal, A. Remediation techniques for removal of heavy metals from the soil contaminated through different sources: A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2020, 27, 1319–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chaney, R.L.; Mli, Y.M.; Brown, S.L.; Brewer, E.P.; Angle, J.S.; Ajm, B. Phytoremediation of soil metals. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 1997, 8, 279–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yaashikaa, P.R.; Kumar, P.S.; Jeevanantham, S.; Saravanan, R. A review on bioremediation approach for heavy metal detoxification and accumulation in plants. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 301, 119035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mahar, A.; Wang, P.; Ali, A.; Awasthi, M.K.; Lahori, A.H.; Wang, Q.; Li, R.; Zhang, Z. Challenges and opportunities in the phytoremediation of heavy metals contaminated soils: A review. Ecotox. Environ. Safe 2016, 126, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kärenlampi, S.; Schat, H.; Vangronsveld, J.; Verkleij, J.; van der Lelie, D.; Mergeay, M.; Tervahauta, A. Genetic engineering in the improvement of plants for phytoremediation of metal polluted soils. Environ. Pollut. 2000, 107, 225–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Purvis, W. Plant power against pollution. Nature 2000, 407, 298–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Su, R.; Li, Y.; Min, M.-Y.; Ouyang, X.-H.; Song, R.-J.; Li, J.-H. Copper-catalyzed oxidative intermolecular 1,2-alkylarylation of styrenes with ethers and indoles. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 13511–13514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Etim, E. Phytoremediation and its mechanisms: A review. Int. J. Environ. Bioenergy 2012, 2, 120–136. [Google Scholar]
  50. Ali, H.; Khan, E.; Sajad, M.A. Phytoremediation of heavy metals—Concepts and applications. Chemosphere 2013, 91, 869–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Farahat, E.A.; Galal, T.M. Trace metal accumulation by Ranunculus sceleratus: Implications for phytostabilization. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2018, 25, 4214–4222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Bhat, S.A.; Bashir, O.; Ul Haq, S.A.; Amin, T.; Rafiq, A.; Ali, M.; Américo-Pinheiro, J.H.P.; Sher, F. Phytoremediation of heavy metals in soil and water: An eco-friendly, sustainable and multidisciplinary approach. Chemosphere 2022, 303, 134788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kotrba, P.; Najmanova, J.; Macek, T.; Ruml, T.; Mackova, M. Genetically modified plants in phytoremediation of heavy metal and metalloid soil and sediment pollution. Biotechnol. Adv. 2009, 27, 799–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Xiao, L.; Zhang, C.; Wang, G.; Guan, D.; Zhang, R.; Chen, Y.; Dai, J. Influencing pathways of soil microbial attributes on accumulation of heavy metals in brassica (Brassica campestris L. ssp.chinensis var.utilis Tsen et Lee) leaves. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 262, 114215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Parmar, S.; Singh, V. Phytoremediation approaches for heavy metal pollution: A review. J. Plant Sci. Res. 2015, 2, 139. [Google Scholar]
  56. Khalid, S.; Shahid, M.; Niazi, N.K.; Murtaza, B.; Bibi, I.; Dumat, C. A comparison of technologies for remediation of heavy metal contaminated soils. J. Geochem. Explor. 2017, 182, 247–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Garbisu, C.; Alkorta, I. Phytoextraction: A cost-effective plant-based technology for the removal of metals from the environment. Bioresour. Technol. 2001, 77, 229–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Limmer, M.; Burken, J. Phytovolatilization of organic contaminants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 6632–6643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Su, R.; Yang, X.-H.; Hu, M.; Wang, Q.-A.; Li, J.-H. Annulation Cascades of N-Allyl-N-((2-bromoaryl)ethynyl)amides Involving C–H Functionalization. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 2786–2789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Bonanno, G. Comparative performance of trace element bioaccumulation and biomonitoring in the plant species Typha domingensis, Phragmites australis and Arundo donax. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2013, 97, 124–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gavrilescu, M. Enhancing phytoremediation of soils polluted with heavy metals. Curr. Opin. Biotech. 2022, 74, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Karaca, O.; Cameselle, C.; Reddy, K.R. Mine tailing disposal sites: Contamination problems, remedial options and phytocaps for sustainable remediation. Rev. Environ. Sci. Bio/Technol. 2018, 17, 205–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ma, Y.; Prasad, M.N.V.; Rajkumar, M.; Freitas, H. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and endophytes accelerate phytoremediation of metalliferous soils. Biotechnol. Adv. 2011, 29, 248–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kumpiene, J.; Lagerkvist, A.; Maurice, C. Stabilization of As, Cr, Cu, Pb and Zn in soil using amendments—A review. Waste Manag. 2008, 28, 215–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Liu, S.; Yang, B.; Liang, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Fang, J. Prospect of phytoremediation combined with other approaches for remediation of heavy metal-polluted soils. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2020, 27, 16069–16085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Shen, X.; Dai, M.; Yang, J.; Sun, L.; Tan, X.; Peng, C.; Ali, I.; Naz, I. A critical review on the phytoremediation of heavy metals from environment: Performance and challenges. Chemosphere 2022, 291, 132979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Acosta-Santoyo, G.; Cameselle, C.; Bustos, E. Electrokinetic–Enhanced ryegrass cultures in soils polluted with organic and inorganic compounds. Environ. Res. 2017, 158, 118–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wang, J.; Zhu, Q.; Shan, Y.; Wang, Y.; Song, X.; Lei, X. A comparative study on the efficiency of biodegradable EDDS and micro-electric field on the promotion of the phytoextraction by Commelina communis L. in Cu-contaminated soils. Geoderma 2018, 314, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Etesami, H. Bacterial mediated alleviation of heavy metal stress and decreased accumulation of metals in plant tissues: Mechanisms and future prospects. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 147, 175–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Su, R.; Wang, Y.; Huang, S.; Chen, R.; Wang, J. Application for Ecological Restoration of Contaminated Soil: Phytoremediation. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 13124. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013124

AMA Style

Su R, Wang Y, Huang S, Chen R, Wang J. Application for Ecological Restoration of Contaminated Soil: Phytoremediation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(20):13124. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013124

Chicago/Turabian Style

Su, Rongkui, Yangyang Wang, Shunhong Huang, Runhua Chen, and Jun Wang. 2022. "Application for Ecological Restoration of Contaminated Soil: Phytoremediation" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 20: 13124. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013124

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop