Next Article in Journal
Nintendo® Wii Therapy Improves Upper Extremity Motor Function in Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Planktothrix agardhii versus Planktothrix rubescens: Separation of Ecological Niches and Consequences of Cyanobacterial Dominance in Freshwater
Previous Article in Journal
Measuring the Effects of Climate Change on Wheat Production: Evidence from Northern China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Persistent Cyanobacteria Blooms in Artificial Water Bodies—An Effect of Environmental Conditions or the Result of Anthropogenic Change
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 19
Issue 19
10.3390/ijerph191912346
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Anabaenopeptins from Nostoc edaphicum CCNP1411

by
Robert Konkel
1,
Michał Grabski
2,
Marta Cegłowska
3,
Ewa Wieczerzak
4,
Grzegorz Węgrzyn
2 and
Hanna Mazur-Marzec
1,*
1
Division of Marine Biotechnology, Institute of Oceanography, University of Gdańsk, M. J. Piłsudskiego 46, PL-81378 Gdynia, Poland
2
Department of Molecular Biology, University of Gdansk, Wita Stwosza 59, PL-80308 Gdańsk, Poland
3
Institute of Oceanology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Powstańców Warszawy 55, PL-81712 Sopot, Poland
4
Department of Biomedical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 63, PL-80308 Gdańsk, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(19), 12346; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912346
Submission received: 2 September 2022 / Revised: 24 September 2022 / Accepted: 26 September 2022 / Published: 28 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Phenomenon of Toxin-Producing Cyanobacterial Blooms and Their Impact on Aquatic Organisms, Ecosystems, and Human Health)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Cyanobacteria of the Nostoc genus belong to the most prolific sources of bioactive metabolites. In our previous study on Nostoc edaphicum strain CCNP1411, the occurrence of cyanopeptolins and nostocyclopeptides was documented. In the current work, the production of anabaenopeptins (APs) by the strain was studied using genetic and chemical methods. Compatibility between the analysis of the apt gene cluster and the structure of the identified APs was found. Three of the APs, including two new variants, were isolated as pure compounds and tested against four serine proteases and carboxypeptidase A (CPA). The in vitro enzymatic assays showed a typical activity of this class of cyanopeptides, i.e., the most pronounced effects were observed in the case of CPA. The activity of the detected compounds against important metabolic enzymes confirms the pharmaceutical potential of anabaenopeptins.

1. Introduction

Anabaenopeptins (APs) are commonly occurring cyanobacteria metabolites assembled by nonribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS) [1,2]. The peptides were identified for the first time in Anabaena flos aquae NRC-525-17 from the Saskatchewan River in Canada and named after the source organism [3]. The production of APs was also documented from Nostoc [4,5,6], Brasilonema [7,8], Desmonostoc [7], Aphanizomenon [9], Anabaena/Dolichospermum [10,11,12,13,14], Nodularia [6,15,16,17,18] (Nostocales order), Lyngbya/Limnoraphis [19,20], Oscillatoria [21,22,23], Planktothrix [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31], Tychonema [32] (Oscillatoriales order), Microcystis [11,28,29,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40] (Chrocococales order), Woronichinia [41,42,43] (Synechococales order) and Schizothrix [44] (Pseudanabaenales order). Additionally, anabaenopeptin-like compounds, keramamides [45,46] and konbamide [47], were found in marine sponges Theonella and Melophlus (Psammocinia aff. bulbosa) [45,46,47,48,49]. As the AP gene cluster was also detected in the tectomicrobial bacterium, the potential for the production of the peptides by other bacteria was suggested [4].
The structure of APs comprises a five-membered peptide ring linked through the ureido bond with one amino acid side chain. The general formula of this class of peptides is X1-CO-[Lys2-X3-X4-MeX5-X6], where Lys2 in D-configuration is the only conservative amino acid in the structure [35,50,51]. Positions 4 and 5 are often occupied by homo-amino acids (e.g., Hph, Hty) and N-methylated amino acids (e.g., MeAla, MeHty, MeAsn or MeHph).
The structural diversity of APs is determined by the organisation of the gene cluster and the corresponding modular NRPS multienzyme complex. Each module catalyses the activation and incorporation of an amino acid into a peptide chain. The modules contain several catalytic domains that are responsible for the subsequent steps of the process. These include the adenylation domain (A), responsible for the recognition and activation of a specific amino acid residue, the thiolation domain (T) that transfers the peptide between the domains, the condensation domain (C) that catalyses the formation of the peptide bond, and the thioesterase domain (Te) that is a part of the last module. Te is responsible for the release and, optionally, for the cyclisation of the free peptide [4,6]. Anabaenopeptin NRPS also contains the epimerase domain (E) in the Lys2 activating module and the methyltransferase domain that catalyses N-methylation of residues at position 5 [4,6]. The biosynthesis of the peptides proceeds according to the collinearity rule so that the number of modules corresponds to the number of residues in the peptide chain.
Peptides with typical AP structural features were named arbitrarily, so their nomenclature is not systematic. Among the 155 identified APs [51], there are structural variants of the compounds named nodulapeptins [15], brunsvicamides [32], ferintoic acids [52], lyngbyaureidamides [20], nostamides [4,6], oscillamides [21,24], pompanopeptins [19], schizopeptin [44], mozamides [48], paltolides [53] and psymbamide [54]. Of these, 38 are produced by cyanobacteria of the genus Nostoc, isolated mainly from terrestrial environments (Table 1 and Table S1).
In the peptides produced by Nostoc, amino acid residues common for other AP variants are present, e.g., in the exocyclic position, Ile/Leu, Phe, Val, Lys or Arg can be found, while position 3 is occupied by Ile/Leu or Val and aromatic amino acids are in position 6 (Figure 1). The unique feature of APs from Nostoc is phenylnorvaline (PNV) and phenylnorleucyne (PNL) in position 4 [56] and the presence of Cl-substituted Hty in positions 4 and 6 [56]. The structural diversity of APs results in a wide range of activities revealed in the in vitro assays. The peptides inhibit protein phosphatases [24,57], elastase [40,58,59], carboxypeptidase A (CPA) [9,23,57], carboxypeptidase B [60] and TAFIa (activated thrombin-activable fibrinolysis inhibitor) [49,56,61].
In our previous work, sequencing of the Nostoc edaphicum CCNP1411 genome revealed the presence of a region similar to the anabaenopeptin synthetase gene cluster. In the current work, the organisation of the gene cluster was studied and compared with the results of structural analysis of the detected APs performed with the application of LC-MS/MS and NMR. In addition, three of the APs were isolated from the collected biomass and tested against four serine proteases and carboxypeptidase A.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. NRPS Alignment

The alignment of anabaenopeptin synthetase gene clusters (GenBank numbers GU174493 and HM773422) [1,6] to the selected region was carried out with BLASTn [62]. Correction of the gene prediction was achieved using Prodigal [63]. Genes found within the aligned regions were subjected to the NCBI Conserved Domain Database search (CDD v3.19) to determine the evolutionary conserved protein domains and motifs [64]. The recognition of the residue positions of amino acids in the substrate-binding pocket of adenylation domains was performed manually, according to Stachelhaus et al. [65]. The CGView Comparison Tool [66] was used to create a map of the genome fragment.

2.2. Extraction and Isolation of Anabaenopeptins

Nostoc edaphicum CCNP1411 was isolated from the Gulf of Gdańsk and grown for biomass as previously described [67]. The lyophilised biomass of N. edaphicum CCNP1411 (80 g) was homogenised with a mortar and pestle and extracted twice with 75% methanol (MeOH) in MilliQ water (2 × 500 mL) by vortexing for 15 min. The combined extracts were centrifuged (10,000× g; 15 min; 4 °C) and diluted to a MeOH concentration lower than 10%. To assess the relative content of the AP variants in N. edaphicum CCNP1411, the cells (23 mg) were additionally extracted twice with 75% MeOH (2 × 5 mL) by 15 min vortexing. The supernatants were evaporated to dry residue and redissolved in 75% MeOH (1 mL).
The separation of the compounds was performed with flash and preparative chromatography using the Shimadzu HPLC system (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan). First, the extract was loaded into a 120 g SNAP cartridge KP-C18-HS (Biotage, Uppsala, Sweden) at a flow rate of 20 mL·min−1. The elution started with MilliQ water, and every 17.5 min, the content of MeOH increased by 10% until it reached 100% MeOH. The 40-L fractions were collected and analysed with an LC-MS/MS system. The fractions containing anabaenopeptins were combined, evaporated in a vacuum concentrator (MiVac, SP Scientific, Ipswich, UK) and separated in a Jupiter Proteo C12 column (250 × 21.2 mm, 4 μm, 90 Å) (Phenomenex, Aschaffenburg, Germany) by repeated preparative chromatography. The mobile phase was composed of a mixture of 5% acetonitrile in MilliQ water (phase A) and 100% acetonitrile (phase B), both with 0.1% formic acid. In the chromatographic runs, gradients from 5% B to 99% B were used. The collected fractions (2 mL each) were analysed with LC-MS/MS.

2.3. LC-MS/MS Analysis

The LC-MS/MS system was composed of Agilent 1200 HPLC (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) and a QTRAP5500 tandem mass spectrometer. The compounds were separated in a Zorbax Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm) (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Gradient elution (0.6 mL·min–1) was performed with the same mobile phases as in the preparative analysis. The turbo ion spray operated at 550 °C; voltage, 5.5 kV; nebuliser gas pressure, 60 psi; curtain gas pressure, 20 psi. To determine the content of the samples, an IDA (information-dependent acquisition) mode was used, and ions within the m/z range 500–1250 and intensity higher than 5 × 105 cps were fragmented. The assessment of the relative content of APs in the extract was performed in multiple reaction monitoring mode (MRM). The following transitions were monitored: 807→402, 231, 120 for anabaenopeptin AP806Ne (m/z 807); 821→448, 248, 120 for AP820Ne (m/z 821); 835→448, 248, 120 for AP SA6 (m/z 835); and 837→448, 248, 120 for AP836Ne (m/z 837). The collision energy was 60 eV, and the dwell time was 100 msek.

2.4. NMR Analysis

1D 1H-NMR and 2D NMR (COSY, TOCSY, and ROESY) were acquired on a Varian Unity Inova 500 spectrometer (500 MHz). Spectra were recorded in DMSO-d6. NMR data were processed and analysed with TopSpin (Bruker) and POKY software [68].

2.5. Enzymatic Assays

The enzyme inhibitory activity of anabaenaopeptins was assayed against trypsin [69], chymotrypsin [70], thrombin [70], elastase [71] and carboxypeptidase A [70]. The samples were serially diluted (1 mg, 1:1–1:10,000 times) in 1% DMSO; the standard inhibitors were also prepared in 1% DMSO (Table S2). The mixtures containing the anabaenopeptins or positive control (standard inhibitors) were preincubated for 5–20 min in a microplate reader (Varioskan Flash Thermo Fisher Scientific OY, Vantaa, Finland) with the addition of the enzyme and buffer (Table S2). As a negative control, 1% DMSO, without the addition of the enzyme, was used. Then, the substrates were added (Table S2), and mixtures were incubated for an additional 10 or 20 min (Table S2). The absorbance was measured at 350 nm (carboxypeptidase A) or at 405 nm (other enzymes). The tests were performed in triplicates.

3. Results

3.1. Anabaenopeptin Nonribosomal Peptide Synthetase (NRPS) Gene Cluster

Although the anabaenopeptin synthetase gene cluster has never been studied in N. edaphicum CCNP1411, it was suggested that nonribosomal anabaenopeptin synthetase might be encoded within its genome [65]. Nevertheless, given spans were inaccurately indicated, in which only a fragment of the gene coding for potential synthetase overlaps with some extended spans of the studied gene cluster. The core structure of the potential anabaenopeptin synthetase cluster is located between the 2,265,881 and 2,288,626 positions within the N. edaphicum CCNP1411 chromosome, and it consists of four genes (locus tags HUN01_12140, HUN01_12145, HUN01_12150 and HUN01_12160) (Figure 2, Table 2). Identified genes are described as those hypothetically encoding proteins being amino acid adenylation domain-containing proteins. The cluster was found on the complementary strand; therefore, locus tag numbers are in the descending order.
The first NRPS ORF, aptA (HUN01_12160), is a 6957 bp long gene, coding for a protein comprised of two modules, one containing the adenylation domain (A) and the second identified as the peptidyl carrier protein (PCP). The first module, lacking the condensation (C) domain but containing the adenylation domain, was predicted (based on the nonribosomal consensus code [65,72]) to be involved in the activation of Leu, Ile or Val, which become amino acid substrates (Table 3). PCP is the shuttle to the nascent (C) catalytic domain of the second module. No mutations were found in the region encoding the HHXXXDG motif of this condensation domain or every other condensation domain found within this cluster, suggesting that a peptide bond between nascent peptides forming the peptide chain may occur. The epimerase domain, included in the second module, explains the stereochemistry of Lys (D-Lys), an amino acid activated by the second module adenylation domain, whose amino group was found on the right side in its Fisher projection.
The second ORF, the aptB gene (HUN01_12150), is a 3231 bp long DNA locus encoding a polypeptide that contains one module. The condensation domain is similar to the DCL-type protein, which catalyses bond formation between the donor D-Lys and the L-amino acid acceptor, namely Leu activated by the adenylation domain.
The third ORF, aptC (HUN01_12145), encodes a protein containing two modules with methyltransferase found nascent to the C-terminus of the second module adenylation domain. The former module was found ambiguous. It appears that the signature sequence of the adenylation domain might activate Phe; nonetheless, such an assessment is based on residue positions obtained from not one but several reference domains. However, in favour of this prediction, the adenylation domain of the aptC-encoded module was found to possess Thr and Ile at positions 278 and 299, respectively, which were found exclusively in the Phe-activating reference domains. The amino acid activated by the second adenylation domain is Asn, presumably methylated by the methyltransferase and transferred further by the PCP domain found at the C-terminus of the aptC gene product.
The start codon of the fourth ORF, putatively encoding NRPS, was found to overlap the stop codon of aptC, suggesting that aptCD may be transcribed as an operon. The aptD gene (HUN01_12140), composed of 4215 bp, encodes a protein, which, apart from the main module, also contains the N-terminal docking domain and the thioesterase domain at the C-terminus, required to release the peptide.
Upstream of the aptABCD synthetase gene cluster, a gene (HUN01_12135) was found, which translated a sequence that was homologous (88% identity) to HphA. As Hph is present in the produced peptide, further investigations revealed that besides HUN01_12135, the genes HUN01_12175 and HUN01_12180 are putatively synonymous with the hphCD and hphB genes, respectively, which are essential for the homo-amino acid biosynthetic pathway [73]. These two genes are located downstream of the aptA gene, and their transcripts were found to be 91% identical to those derived from Nostoc punctiforme (GenBank accession number WP_012409012). The core structure of the anabaenopeptin synthetase gene cluster was aligned against three previously characterised hypothetical anabaenopeptin-producing cyanobacterial strains, namely Nodularia spumigena CCY9414, Anabaena sp. 90 and Nostoc punctiforme PCC 73,102 [74]. Although the structures of clusters derived from Nodularia and Anabaena exhibit overall similarity, as evidenced by the percentage of identities (mean percentage identity = 78.48), the Nostoc punctiforme NRPS sequence does not resemble the structure of the anabaenopeptin synthetase gene cluster (Figure S1).

3.2. Identification of AP Structures

The nontargeted LC-MS/MS analysis of the N. edaphicum CCNP 1411 cell extract in IDA mode did not reveal the presence of any anabaenopeptin variants. Variants of four anabaenopeptins with pseudomolecular ions ([M+H]+) at m/z 807, 821, 835 and 837 (Table 4) were only detected when several chromatographic fractions were combined and concentrated. MRM analyses were performed to determine the relative amount of anabaenopeptins produced by N. edaphicum. The peak area of AP820Ne in the MRM chromatogram was the largest (9.63 × 105 cps) compared with AP SA6 (4.49 × 104 cps), AP836Ne (2.19 × 104 cps) and (1.84 × 104 cps) (Figure S2). Structures of the peptides were elucidated based on the analysis of mass fragmentation spectra with some diagnostic ions, including immonium ions and other ions that correspond to specific fragment ions formed during collision-induced dissociation (Figure 3 and Figures S3–S5). Positions 2, 3 and 6 of the peptides were found to be conserved and occupied by Lys2, Leu/Ile3 and Phe6, respectively. The applied genetic and chemical methods (MS/MS and NMR) did not allow for the distinction between Leu and Ile; therefore, in this work, the residue is marked as Leu*. The most significant diagnostic ions were: Lys-derived ions at m/z 84, 101 and 129; immonium ions of Phe (120), Hph (134), MeAsn (101), Leu* (86) and Val (72); ions generated by the cyclic part of APs at m/z 664, 678, 678 and 694 (for AP807Ne, AP820Ne, AP SA6 and AP836Ne, respectively); and [M+H-X1-(X3+X4)]+ ion at m/z 434 for AP807 and at m/z 448 for AP820Ne, AP SA6 and AP836Ne. In all MS/MS spectra of MeAsn-containing APs, the [MeAsn+Phe+H-CO]+ ion at m/z 248 is present. Other ions that confirmed the structure of AP are shown in Figure 3 and Figures S3–S5.
For AP820Ne isolated from N. edaphicum CCNP1411 in the highest amounts (~1 mg), structural analysis by NMR was possible. The 1H-NMR spectra (Figures S6–S9) of the studied compound displayed the typical pattern of a peptide (i.e., amide protons δH 6.62–9.02 ppm and protons α to carbonyl in amino acids δH 3.53–5.33 ppm). The COSY and TOCSY experiments allowed to assign NMR spin systems to Val, Lys, Leu*, Hph, N-MeAsp and Phe (Figure 4, Table 5). The presence of aromatic amino acid residues was recognised by the signals occurring in the aromatic region of the spectrum (δH 7.01–7.32 ppm). The sequence assignments based on NMR data corroborated the results of the MS experiments of the compound and are consistent with published data [40].

3.3. Enzymatic Assays

Of the four identified APs, only three were isolated as pure compounds and in sufficient amounts to perform enzyme inhibition assays. These were AP SA6, AP820Ne and AP806Ne. In vitro experiments did not reveal the activity of the peptides against trypsin and chymotrypsin, and their activity against thrombin was only observed at the highest concentration used in the assay (45 µg mL–1) (Table 6). The three tested APs inhibited the activity of carboxypeptidase A. The IC50 value for AP806Ne was higher (21.0 µM) than for AP820Ne (3.53 µM) and AP SA6 (4.5 µM), indicating lower activity of AP806Ne. The latter two APs were also active against elastase and inhibited the enzyme with IC50 = 5.5 µM and 22.7 µM, respectively.

4. Discussion

In this work, the anabaenopeptin biosynthetic gene cluster and its products were analysed. A genome of a cyanobacterial strain usually contains several NRPS gene clusters, and within one class of the gene products, numerous structural variants are produced. Analysis of 184 cyanobacterial genomes deposited in the NCBI GeneBank showed a positive correlation between genome size (1.65–12.05 Mb) and the number of natural product biosynthetic gene clusters [75]. In line with this rule, cyanobacteria of the Nostocales order (including Nostoc) belong to the most prolific sources of natural products [76]. They synthesise numerous bioactive metabolites classified as peptides, lipopeptides, fatty acids, alkaloids and terpenoids [35,77,78,79,80]. In our previous studies, two classes of nonribosomal peptides, cyanopeptolins [81] and nostocyclopeptides [67], were identified in N. edaphicum CCNP1411 (total genome size 8.31 Mb, including five plasmids). In addition, a region similar to the anabaenopeptin gene cluster was found in the chromosome [67]. To check apt gene expression, LC-MS/MS analysis of N. edaphicum extract was performed, but APs were not detected. This result suggested either lack of apt gene expression or production of the peptides in trace amounts. The latter option was confirmed when APs were detected in the analyses of concentrated N. edaphicum biomass. Of these, AP SA6 is the only AP that has been previously reported [50,56], while the other three are new structural variants. Their structures were found to be characteristic of APs produced by cyanobacteria of the genus Nostoc. All positions, especially in the cyclic part of the molecule, are occupied by the residues that were most frequently reported in APs identified in Nostoc (Figure 1). The occurrence of MeAsn/Asn in position 5 is quite rare and unique to Nostoc [5,7,56] or Desmonostoc [7], previously classified as Nostoc [82]. To distinguish the new APs from the already known variants with the same molecular masses (and the same m/z values), we added two letters in their symbols (Ne = N. edaphicum). However, even with these symbols, some confusion might occur when new APs are detected in other N. edaphicum strains. As has already been postulated by other authors, with the growing number of new anabaenopeptin variants, their nomenclature needs to be systematised.
In different taxonomic groups of cyanobacteria, the organisation of the NRPS gene clusters involved in the biosynthesis of anabaenopeptins is similar. However, even in strains of the same species, the products of the genes can vary. Namely, the specific positions in the AP structure can be occupied by different amino acid residues. The structural diversity of NRPs encoded by a single NRPS results mainly from the promiscuity of A domains responsible for the selection and incorporation of amino acids [1,6]. In Anabaena sp. 90, the diversity is additionally increased by the presence of two starter modules with different substrate specificity of A domains activating the first amino acid residue [6]. In N. edaphicum CCNP141, the 22.7 kb apt gene cluster was found to be similar in size and organisation to the apt gene clusters described in other cyanobacteria [1,4,6,83]. The cluster is composed of four genes encoding four NRPS enzymes (aptABCD) containing six modules. Moreover, the predicted substrate specificity of A domains in the enzymatic complex catalysing AP synthesis supported the identification of specific amino acids in AP structures performed by MS/MS analyses. The detection of the epimerase domain in the second module corroborates the presence of D-Lys in position 2. In addition, the presence of methyltransferase at the C-terminus of the aptC gene product and the detection of genes synonymous with the hphCD and hphB genes confirmed the presence of homo-amino acid in position 4 and methylated amino acid in position 5 [4,83]. Homo-amino acids are also present in cyanopeptolins detected in the strain [81]. They belong to nonproteinogenic amino acids frequently detected in cyanobacterial peptides [50].
The main reasons for a wide interest in anabaenopeptins are their frequent occurrence in various taxonomic groups of cyanobacteria and their biological activity [23,24,40,51,56,77,84]. The promising activity of APs with respect to pharmaceutical application was documented for TAFIa [56]. The compounds inhibit the activity of the enzyme even at a low nM range [56,59]. TAFIa regulates the process of fibrinolysis; therefore, inhibitors of the enzymes are thought to be good candidates for the development of antithrombotic agents.
In our study, the effects of APs on important metabolic enzymes were also explored. The enzymatic assays showed that the isolated APs were inactive against trypsin and chymotrypsin and had weak effects on thrombin, but only at the highest concentration used in the assay. In fact, with the exception of elastase, APs were reported to have mild or no effects on serine proteases such as trypsin, chymotrypsin or thrombin [21,26,40,44,59]. In contrast, APs were found to inhibit CPA, enzymes catalysing the cleavage of carboxyl-terminal peptide bonds in proteins [85]. Deregulation of CPA can lead to cardiovascular disease or cancer [86]. Structure–activity relationship studies revealed the importance of exocyclic amino acid for the potency of APs [9,87]. The presence of hydrophobic amino acids in this position significantly increased their activity compared with peptides with polar residues, such as Lys or Arg. For example, AP G (Tyr+CO[Lys+Ile+Hty+MeHty+Ile]) inhibits CPA with approximately three orders of magnitude lower IC50 value (0.002 μM) than AP H (IC50 3.7 μM), which contains Arg instead of Tyr [9,23,87]. However, the activity of the three APs tested in our study was not in line with these findings. The compounds contain hydrophobic amino acids (Leu* or Val) in the exocyclic position, but their effect on CPA was mild (IC50 values from 3.5 μM to 21.1 μM). This discrepancy indicates that besides the exocyclic amino acid residue, other parts of APs’ structure also have an effect on the activity.

5. Conclusions

As presented in the study, nontargeted chemical analyses may not allow for the detection of compounds produced by cyanobacteria in trace amounts. Therefore, a simultaneous application of genetic and chemical methods is recommended to reveal the full metabolic profile of the organism. Like many other cyanobacteria strains, Nostoc edaphicum CCNP1411 produces several structural variants of anabaenopeptins. The structural diversity of the peptides results in their different activities against specific biological targets. This fact raises the question of why cyanobacteria produce several structural variants of anabaenopeptins and what their natural function is.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijerph191912346/s1, Figure S1: schematic alignment of genes coding for anabaenopeptin synthetase from N. edaphicum CCNP1411 and three related apt regions encoding synthetases from Nodularia spumigena CCY9414 (CP007203.2), Anabaena sp. 90 (GU174493.1) and Nostoc punctiforme PCC 73102 (NC_010628.1). The grey bar in the upper right corner shows the identity percentage associated with the colour of the bars connecting homologous regions. Red colour represents genes of core anabaenopeptin biosynthetic gene cluster, burgundy colour represents putative hphA gene and dark grey represents the aptE gene coding for an ATP binding cassette transporter. NRPS from Nostoc punctiforme PCC 73102 is portrayed in shades of grey, as it does not resemble an apt biosynthetic gene cluster. Schematic alignment of genes was visualised by EasyFig programme (http://mjsull.github.io/Easyfig/files.html, accessed on 23 August 2022), Table S1: anabaenopeptin variants produced by genus Nostoc, Table S2: conditions and solvents used in the enzyme inhibition assays, Figure S2: MRM chromatograms of anabaenopeptins produced by N. edaphicum CCNP1411, Figure S3: structure and enhanced product ion mass spectrum of the anabaenopeptin AP806Ne [Lys–Leu*–Hph–Asn–Phe]CO–Val with precursor ion [M+H]+ at m/z 807. The mass signals were assigned to the following fragments: 807 [M+H]+, 790 [M+2H–H2O]+, 789 [M+H–H2O]+, 779 [M+H–CO]+, 762 [M+2H–CO–H2O]+, 744 [M+2H–CO–2H2O]+, 708 [M+H–Val]+, 694 [M+H–Leu*]+, 690 [M+H–Val–H2O]+, 664 [M+H–(Val–CO)]+, 646 [M+H–Hph]+, 629 [M+2H–Hph–H2O]+, 619 [M+2H–Hph–CO]+, 601 [M+2H–Hph–CO–H2O]+, 536 [M+H–(Lys–CO–Val)]+, 533 [M+H–(Leu*+Hph)]+, 518 [M+H–(Lys–CO–Val)-H2O]+, 515 [M+H–(Leu*–Hph)–H2O]+, 506 [M+2H–(Leu*+Hph) –CO]+, 504 [M+H–(Asn+Phe)–CO]+, 434 [M+H–(Hph+Leu*)–Val]+, 420 [M+2H–(Leu*+Hph+Asn)]+, 402 [M+2H–(Leu*+Hph+Asn)–H2O]+, 390 [Asn+Phe+Lys+H]+, 362 [Asn+Phe+Lys+H–CO]+, 343 [Leu*+Phe+Lys+H–CO-H2O]+, 276 [Hph+Asn+H]+, 262 [Phe+Asn+H]+, 248 [Phe+Lys+H–CO]+, 234 [Phe+Asn+H–CO]+, 173 [Lys+CO+NH2+H]+, 134 Hph immonium ion, 129 [Lys+2H]+, 120 Phe immonium ion, 86 Leu* immonium ion, 84 Lys-derived ions+ and 72 Val immonium ion, Figure S4: structure and enhanced product ion mass spectrum of the anabaenopeptin AP SA6 [Lys–Leu*–Hph–MeAsn–Phe]CO–Leu* with precursor ion [M+H]+ at m/z 835. The mass signals were assigned to the following fragments: 835 [M+H]+, 817 [M+H–H2O]+, 807 [M+H–CO]+, 800 [M+H–NH3–H2O]+, 789 [M+H–CO–H2O]+, 772 [M+H–CO–H2O–NH3]+, 722 [M+H–Leu*]+, 707 [M+H–MeAsn]+, 704 [M+H–Leu*–H2O]+, 678 [M+H–(CO+Leu*)]+, 674 [M+H–Hph]+, 660 [M+H–(CO+Leu*)–H2O]+, 656 [M+H–Hph–H2O]+, 561 [M+H–(Leu*+Hph)]+, 550 [M+H–(Lys+CO+Leu*)]+, 533 [M+H–(Leu*+Hph)–CO]+, 448 [M+H–Leu*–(Hph+Leu*)]+, 403 [Leu*+Hph+MeAsp+H]+, 276 [Phe+MeAsn+H]+, 248 [Phe+MeAsn+H–CO]+, 173 [Lys+CO+NH2+H]+, 134 Hph immonium ion, 129 [Lys+2H]+, 84 Lys-derived ions+, 120 Phe immonium ion, 101 MeAsn immonium and 86 Leu* immonium ion, Figure S5: structure and enhanced product ion mass spectrum of the anabaenopeptin AP836Ne [Lys–Leu*–Hty–MeAsn–Phe]CO–Leu* with precursor ion [M+H]+ at m/z 837. The mass signals were assigned to the following fragments: 837 [M+H]+, 819 [M+H–H2O]+, 809 [M+H–CO]+, 802 [M+H–NH3–H2O]+, 791 [M+H–CO–H2O]+, 738 [M+H–Val]+, 724 [M+H–Leu*]+, 720 [M+H–Val-H2O]+, 709 [M+H–MeAsn]+, 694 [M+H–(CO+Val)]+, 660 [M+H–Hty]+, 566 [M+H–(Lys+CO+Val)]+, 547 [M+H–(Leu*+Hty)]+, 519 [M+H–(Leu*+Hty)–CO]+, 448 [M+H–Val–(Hty+Leu*)]+, 419 [M+H–(Leu*+Hty+MeAsn)]+, 388 [Leu*+Lys+Phe+H]+, 276 [Phe+MeAsn+H]+, 248 [Phe+MeAsn+H–CO]+, 173 [Lys+CO+NH2+2H]+, 150 Hty immonium ion, 129 [Lys+2H]+, 84 Lys-derived ions+, 120 Phe immonium ion, 101 MeAsn immonium and 72 Val immonium ion, Figure S6: 1H NMR spectrum of anabaenopeptin AP820Ne in DMSO-d6, Figure S7: COSY spectrum of anabaenopeptin AP820Ne in DMSO-d6, Figure S8: TOCSY spectrum of anabaenopeptin AP820Ne in DMSO-d6, Figure S9: ROESY spectrum of anabaenopeptin AP820Ne in DMSO-d6. Reference [88] is cited in the Supplementary Materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, R.K., M.G., H.M.-M. and G.W.; methodology, R.K., M.G., H.M.-M. and G.W.; software and validation, M.G.; formal analysis, R.K. (LC-MS/MS, extraction, fractionation, isolation of compounds, enzymatic assays), M.G. (genetic analysis), M.C. (enzymatic assays) and E.W. (NMR); investigation, R.K. and M.G.; original draft preparation, R.K. and M.G.; manuscript—review and editing, R.K., H.M.-M., M.G., M.C., E.W. and G.W.; visualisation, R.K. and M.G.; project administration, H.M.-M.; funding acquisition, H.M.-M. and M.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Science Centre in Poland (2019/33/B/NZ9/02018) and by the statutory programme of the Institute of Oceanology, PAN (grant no. II.3).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Christiansen, G.; Philmus, B.; Hemscheidt, T.; Kurmayer, R. Genetic variation of adenylation domains of the anabaenopeptin synthesis operon and evolution of substrate promiscuity. J. Bacteriol. 2011, 193, 3822–3831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Entfellner, E.; Frei, M.; Christiansen, G.; Deng, L.; Blom, J.; Kurmayer, R. Evolution of anabaenopeptin peptide structural variability in the cyanobacterium Planktothrix. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Harada, K.-I.; Fujii, K.; Shimada, T.; Suzuki, M.; Sano, H.; Adachi, K. Two cyclic peptides, anabaenopeptins, a third group of bioactive compounds from the cyanobacterium Anabaena flos-aquae NRC 525-17. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 1511–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Shishido, T.K.; Jokela, J.; Fewer, D.P.; Wahlsten, M.; Fiore, M.F.; Sivonen, K. Simultaneous production of anabaenopeptins and namalides by the cyanobacterium Nostoc sp. CENA543. ACS Chem. Biol. 2017, 12, 2746–2755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Riba, M.; Kiss-Szikszai, A.; Gonda, S.; Parizsa, P.; Deák, P.; Török, P.; Valkó, O.; Felföldi, T.; Vasas, G. Chemotyping of terrestrial Nostoc-like isolates from alkali grassland areas by non-target peptide analysis. Algal Res. 2020, 46, 101798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rouhiainen, L.; Jokela, J.; Fewer, D.P.; Urmann, M.; Sivonen, K. Two alternative starter modules for the non-ribosomal biosynthesis of specific anabaenopeptin variants in Anabaena (cyanobacteria). Chem. Biol. 2010, 17, 25–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sanz, M.; Andreote, A.P.D.; Fiore, M.F.; Döre, F.A.; Pinto, E. Structural characterization of new peptide variants produced by cyanobacteria from the Brazilian Atlantic coastal forest using liquid chromatography coupled to quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 3892–3919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Saha, S.; Esposito, G.; Urajová, P.; Mareš, J.; Ewe, D.; Caso, A.; Macho, M.; Dalewská, K.; Kust, A.; Hrouzek, P.; et al. Discovery of unusual cyanobacterial tryptophan-containing anabaenopeptins by MS/MS-based molecular networking. Molecules 2020, 25, 3786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Murakami, M.; Suzuki, S.; Itou, Y.; Kodani, S.; Ishida, K. New anabaenopeptins, potent carboxypeptidase-A inhibitors from the cyanobacterium Aphanizomenon flos-aquae. J. Nat. Prod. 2000, 63, 1280–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fujii, K.; Harada, K.-I.; Suzuki, M.; Kondo, F.; Ikai, Y.; Oka, H.; Carmichael, W.W.; Sivonen, K. Novel Cyclic peptides together with microcystins produced by toxic cyanobacteria, Anabaena sp. Symp. Chem. Nat. Prod. Symp. Pap. 1995, 37, 445–450. [Google Scholar]
  11. Urrutia-Codero, P.; Agha, R.; Cirés, S.; Lezcano, M.Á.; Sánchez-Contreras, M.; Waara, K.-O.; Utkilen, H.; Quesada, A. Effects of harmful cyanobacteria on the freshwater pathogenic free-living amoeba Acanthamoeba castellani. Aquat. Toxicol. 2013, 130–131, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Fujii, K.; Sivonen, K.; Nakano, T.; Harada, K.-I. Structural elucidation of cyanobacterial peptides encoded by peptide synthetase gene in Anabaena species. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 6863–6871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Grach-Pogrebinsky, O.; Carmeli, S. Three novel anabaenopeptins from the cyanobacterium Anabaena sp. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 10233–10238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tonk, L.; Welker, M.; Huisman, J.; Visser, P.M. Production of cyanopeptolins, anabaenopeptins, and microcystins by the harmful cyanobacteria Anabaena 90 and Microcystis PCC 7806. Harmful Algae 2009, 8, 219–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fujii, K.; Sivonen, K.; Adachi, K.; Noguchi, K.; Shimizu, Y.; Sano, H.; Hirayama, K.; Suzuki, M.; Harada, K.-I. Comparative study of toxic and non-toxic cyanobacterial products: A novel glycoside, suomlide, from non-toxic Nodularia spumigena HKVV. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 5529–5532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Schumacher, M.; Wilson, N.; Tabudravu, J.N.; Edwards, C.; Lawton, L.; Motti, C.; Wright, A.D.; Diederich, M.; Jaspars, M. New nodulapeptins from Nodularia spumigena KAC 66. Tetrahedron 2012, 68, 1622–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mazur-Marzec, H.; Kaczkowska, M.J.; Błaszczyk, A.; Akcaalan, R.; Spoof, L.; Meriluoto, J. Diversity of peptides produced by Nodularia spumigena from various geographical regions. Mar. Drugs 2013, 11, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mazur-Marzec, H.; Bertos-Fortis, M.; Toruńska-Sitarz, A.; Fidor, A.; Legrand, C. Chemical and genetic diversity of Nodularia spumigena from the Baltic Sea. Mar. Drugs 2016, 14, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Matthew, S.; Ross, C.; Paul, V.J.; Luesch, H. Pompanopeptins A and B, new cyclic peptides from the marine cyanobacterium Lyngbya confervoides. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 4081–4089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zi, J.; Lantvit, D.D.; Swansonm, S.M.; Orjala, J. Lyngbyaureidamides A and B, two anabaenopeptins from the cultured freshwater cyanobacterium Lyngbya sp. (SAG 36.91). Phytochemistry 2012, 74, 173–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sano, T.; Kaya, K. Oscillamide Y, A Chymotrypsin inhibitor from toxic Oscillatoria Agardhii. Terahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 5933–5936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shin, H.J.; Matsuda, H.; Murakami, M.; Yamaguchi, K. Anabaenopeptins E and F, two new cyclic peptides from the cyanobacterium Oscillatoria agardhii (NIES-204). J. Nat. Prod. 1997, 60, 139–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Itou, Y.; Suzuki, S.; Ishida, K.; Murakami, M. Anabaenopeptins G and H, potent carboxypeptidase A inhibitors from the cyanobacterium Oscillatoria agardhii (NIES—595). Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1999, 9, 1243–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sano, T.; Usui, T.; Ueda, K.; Osada, H.; Kaya, K. Isolation of new protein phosphatase inhibitors from two cyanobacteria species, Planktothrix spp. J. Nat. Prod. 2001, 54, 1052–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kosol, S.; Schmidt, J.; Kurmayer, R. Variation in peptide net production and growth among strains of the toxic cyanobacterium Planktothrix spp. Eur. J. Phycol. 2009, 44, 49–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Okumura, S.; Philmus, B.; Portmann, C.; Hemscheidt, T.K. Homotyrosine-containing cyanopeptolins 880 and 960 and anabaenopeptins 908 and 915 from Planktothrix agardhii CYA 126/8. J. Nat. Prod. 2009, 72, 172–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Welker, M.; Erhard, M. Consistency between chemotyping of single filaments of Planktothrix rubescens (cyanobacteria) by MALDI-TOF and the peptide patterns of strains determined by HPLC-MS. J. Mass Spectrom. 2007, 42, 1062–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Erhard, M.; Von Döhren, H.; Jungblut, P.R. Rapid Identification of the new anabaenopeptin G from Planktothrix agardhii HUB 011 using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1999, 13, 337–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Welker, M.; Christiansen, G.; Von Döhren, H. Diversity of coexisting Planktothrix (Cyanobacteria) chemotypes deduced by mass spectral analysis of microystins and other oligopeptides. Arch. Microbiol. 2004, 182, 288–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rohrlack, T.; Edvardsen, B.; Skulberg, R.; Halsvedt, C.B.; Utkilen, H.C.; Ptacnik, R.; Skulberg, O.M. Oligopeptide chemotypes of the toxic freshwater cyanobacterium Planktothrix can form subpopulations with dissimilar ecological traits. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2008, 53, 1279–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Grach-Pogrebinsky, O.; Sedmak, B.; Carmeli, S. Protease inhibitors from a Slovenian Lake Bled toxic waterbloom of the cyanobacterium Planktothrix rubescens. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 8329–8336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Müller, D.; Krick, A.; Kehraus, S.; Mehner, C.; Hart, M.; Küpper, F.C.; Saxena, K.; Prinz, H.; Schwalbe, H.; Janning, P.; et al. Brunsvicamides A–C: Sponge-related cyanobacterial peptides with Mycobacterium tuberculosis protein tyrosine phosphatase inhibitory activity. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 4871–4878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Fastner, J.; Erhard, M.; Döhren, H. Determination of oligopeptide diversity within a natural population of Microcystis spp. (cyanobacteria) by typing single colonies by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 67, 5069–5076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Beresovsky, D.; Hadas, O.; Livne, A.; Sukenik, A.; Kaplan, A.; Carmeli, S. Toxins and biologically active secondary metabolites of Microcystis sp. isolated from Lake Kinneret. Isr. J. Chem. 2006, 46, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Welker, M.; Von Döhren, H. Cyanobacterial peptides—nature’s own combinatorial biosynthesis. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2006, 30, 530–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Saker, M.L.; Fastner, J.; Dittmann, E.; Christiansen, G.; Vasconcelos, V.M. Variation between strains of the cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa isolated from a Portuguese river. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2005, 99, 749–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Martins, J.; Saker, M.; Moreira, C.; Welker, M.; Fastner, J.; Vasconcelos, V.M. Peptide diversity in strains of the cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa isolated from Portuguese water supplies. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 82, 951–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Adiv, S.; Carmeli, S. Protease inhibitors from Microcystis aeruginosa bloom material collected from the Dalton Reservoir, Israel. J. Nat. Prod. 2013, 76, 2307–2315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Riba, M.; Kiss-Szikszai, A.; Gonda, S.; Boros, G.; Vitál, Z.; Borsodi, A.K.; Krett, G.; Borics, G.; Ujvárosi, A.Z.; Vasas, G. Microcystis Chemotype diversity in the alimentary tract of bigheaded carp. Toxins 2019, 11, 288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zafrir-Ilan, E.; Carmeli, S. Eight novel serine proteases inhibitors from a water bloom of the cyanobacterium Microcystis sp. Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 9194–9202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bober, B.; Lechowski, Z.; Bialczyk, J. Determination of some cyanopeptides synthesized by Woronichinia naegeliana (Chroococcales, Cyanophyceae). Phycol. Res. 2011, 59, 286–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bober, B.; Chrapusta-Srebrny, E.; Bialczyk, J. Novel cyanobacterial metabolites, cyanopeptolin 1081 and anabaenopeptin 899, isolated from an enrichment culture dominated by Woronichinia naegeliana (Unger) Elenkin. Eur. J. Phycol. 2020, 56, 244–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Häggqvist, K.; Toruńska-Sitarz, A.; Błaszczyk, A.; Mazur-Marzec, H.; Meriluoto, J. Morphologic, Phylogenetic and chemical characterization of a brackish colonial Picocyanobacterium (Coelosphaeriaceae) with bioactive properties. Toxins 2016, 8, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Reshef, V.; Carmeli, S. Schizopeptin 791, a new anabeanopeptin-like cyclic peptide from the cyanobacterium Schizothrix sp. J. Nat. Prod. 2002, 65, 1187–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Uemoto, H.; Yahiro, Y.; Shigemori, H.; Tsuda, M.; Takao, T.; Shimonishi, Y.; Kobayashi, J. Keramamides K and L, new cyclic peptides containing unusual tryptophan residue from Theonella sponge. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 6719–6724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kobayashi, J.; Sato, M.; Ishibashi, M.; Shigemori, H.; Nakamura, T.; Ohizumi, Y. Keramamide A, a novel peptide from the Okinawan marine sponge Theonella sp. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1991, 1, 2609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kobayashi, J.; Sato, M.; Murayama, T.; Ishibashi, M.; Wälchi, M.R.; Kanai, M.; Shoji, J.; Ohizumi, Y. Konbamide, a novel peptide with calmodulin antagonistic activity from the Okinawan marine sponge Theonella sp. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1991, 15, 1050–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Schmidt, E.W.; Harper, M.K.; Faulkner, D.J. Mozamides A and B, cyclic peptides from a Theonellid sponge from Mozambique. J. Nat. Prod. 1997, 60, 779–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bjoerquist, P.; Buchanan, M.; Campitelli, M.; Carroll, A.; Hyde, E.; Neve, J.; Polla, M.; Quinn, R. Use of Cyclic Anabaenopeptin-Type Peptides for the Treatment of a Condition Wherein Inhibition of Carboxypeptidase U Is Beneficial, Novel Anabaenopeptin Derivatives and Intermediates Thereof. U.S. Patent WO2005039617, 6 May 2005. [Google Scholar]
  50. Jones, M.R.; Pinto, M.; Torres, M.A.; Dörr, F.; Mazur-Marzec, H.; Szubert, K.; Tartaglione, L.; Dell’Aversano, C.; Miles, C.O.; Beach, D.G.; et al. CyanoMetDB, a comprehensive public database of secondary metabolites from cyanobacteria. Water Res. 2021, 196, 117017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zervou, S.; Kaloudis, T.; Gkelis, S.; Hiskia, A.; Mazur-Marzec, H. Anabaenopeptin from cyanobacteria in freshwated bodies of Greece. Toxins 2022, 14, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Williams, D.E.; Craig, M.; Holmes, C.F.B.; Andersen, R.J. Ferintoic acids A and B, new cyclic hexapeptides from the freshwater cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa. J. Nat. Prod. 1996, 59, 570–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Plaza, A.; Keffer, J.L.; Lloyd, J.R.; Colin, P.L.; Bewley, C.A. Paltolides A–C, anabaenopeptin-type peptides from the Palau sponge Theonella swinhoei. J. Nat. Prod. 2010, 73, 485–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Robinson, S.J.; Tenney, K.; Yee, D.F.; Martinez, L.; Media, J.E.; Valeriote, F.A.; Van Soest, R.W.M.; Crews, P. Probing the bioactive constituents from chemotypes of the sponge Psammocinia aff. bulbosa. J. Nat. Prod. 2007, 70, 1002–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Guljamow, A.; Kreische, M.; Ishida, K.; Liaimer, A.; Altermark, B.; Bähr, L.; Hertweck, C.; Ehwald, R.; Dittmann, E. High-density cultivation of terrestrial Nostoc strains leads to reprogramming of secondary metabolome. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 83, 01510–01517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Schreuder, H.; Liesum, A.; Lönze, P.; Stump, H.; Hoffmann, H.; Schiell, M.; Kurz, M.; Toti, L.; Bauer, A.; Kallus, C. Isolation, co-crystallization and structure-based characterization of anabaenopeptins as highly potent inhibitors of activated thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFIa). Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 32958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Spoof, L.; Błaszczyk, A.; Meriluoto, J.; Cegłowska, M.; Mazur-Marzec, H. Structures and activity of new anabaenopeptins produced by Baltic Sea cyanobacteria. Mar. Drugs 2016, 14, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Repka, S.; Koivula, M.; Harjunpä, V.; Rouhiainen, L.; Sivonen, K. Effects of phosphate and light on growth of and bioactive peptide production by the cyanobacterium anabaena strain 90 and its anabaenopeptilide mutant. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 4551–4560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Bubik, A.; Sedmak, B.; Novinec, M.; Lenarčič, B.; Lah, T.T. Cytotoxic and peptidase inhibitory activities of selected non-hepatotoxic cyclic peptides from cyanobacteria. Biol. Chem. 2008, 338, 1339–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Kodani, S.; Suzuki, S.; Ishida, K.; Murakami, M. Five new cyanobacterial peptides from water bloom materials of lake Teganuma (Japan). FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1999, 178, 343–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Halland, N.; Brönstrup, M.; Czech, J.; Czechtizky, W.; Evers, A.; Follmann, M.; Kohlmann, M.; Schiell, M.; Kurz, M.; Schreuder, H.A.; et al. Novel small molecule inhibitors of activated thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFIa) from natural product anabaenopeptin. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 58, 4839–4844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Camacho, C.; Coulouris, G.; Avagyan, V.; Ma, N.; Papadopoulos, J.; Bealer, K.; Madden, T.L. BLAST+: Architecture and applications. BMC Bioinform. 2009, 15, 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Hyatt, D.; Chen, G.L.; Locascio, P.F.; Land, M.L.; Larimer, F.W.; Hauser, L.J. Prodigal: Prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinform. 2010, 11, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Marchler-Bauer, A.; Lu, S.; Anderson, J.N.; Chitsaz, F.; Derbyshire, M.K.; DeWeese-Scott, C.; Fong, J.H.; Geer, L.Y.; Geer, R.C.; Gonzales, N.R.; et al. CDD: A conserved domain database for the functional annotation of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, 225–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Stachelhaus, T.; Mootz, H.D.; Marahiel, M.A. The specificity-conferring code of adenylation domains in nonribosomal peptide synthetases. Chem. Biol. 1999, 6, 493–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Grant, J.R.; Arantes, A.S.; Stothard, P. Comparing thousands of circular genomes using the CGView comparison tool. BMC Genomics 2012, 23, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Fidor, A.; Grabski, M.; Gawor, J.; Gromadka, R.; Węgrzyn, G.; Mazur-Marzec, H. Nostoc edaphicum CCNP1411 from the Baltic Sea—A new producer of nostocyclopeptides. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Lee, W.; Rahimi, M.; Lee, Y.; Chiu, A. POKY: A software suite for multidimensional NMR and 3D structure calculation of biomolecules. Bioinformatics 2021, 37, 3041–3042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Pluotno, A.; Carmeli, S. Banyasin A and banyasides A and B, three novel modified peptides from a water bloom of the cyanobacterium Nostoc sp. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 575–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ocampo Bennet, X. Peptide au Seiner Cyanobakterien Wasserblütte (1998) aus dem Wannsee/Berli: Strukturen and Biologische Wirksamkeit; University Freiburg: Freiburg, Germany, 2007; 28p. [Google Scholar]
  71. Kwan, J.; Taori, K.; Paul, V.; Luesch, H. Lyngbyastatins 8–10, elastase inhibitors with cyclic depsipeptide scaffolds isolated from the marine cyanobacterium Lyngbya semiplena. Mar. Drugs 2009, 7, 528–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Challis, G.L.; Ravel, J.; Townsend, C.A. Predictive, structure-based model of amino acid recognition by nonribosomal peptide synthetase adenylation domains. Chem. Biol. 2000, 7, 211–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Koketsu, K.; Mitsuhashi, S.; Tabata, K. Identification of homophenylalanine biosynthetic genes from the cyanobacterium Nostoc punctiforme PCC73102 and application to its microbial production by Escherichia coli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 2201–2208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Lima, S.T.; Alvarenga, D.O.; Etchegaray, A.; Fewer, D.P.; Jokela, J.; Varani, A.M.; Sanz, M.; Dörr, F.A.; Sivonen, K.; Fiore, M.F. Genetic organization of anabaenopeptin and spumigin biosynthetic gene clusters in the cyanobacterium Sphaerospermopsis torques-reginae ITEP-024. ACS Chem. Biol. 2017, 12, 769–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Popin, R.V.; Alvarenga, D.O.; Castelo-Branco, R.; Fewer, D.P.; Sivonen, K. Mining of cyanobacterial genomes indicates natural product biosynthetic gene clusters located in conjugative plasmids. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 4, 684565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Fidor, A.; Konkel, R.; Mazur-Marzec, H. Bioactive peptides produced by cyanobacteria of the genus Nostoc: A Review. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Nowruzi, B.; Khavari-Nejad, R.; Sivonen, K.; Kazemi, B.; Najafi, F.; Nejadsattari, T. Phylogenetic and morphological evaluation of two species of Nostoc (Nostocales, cyanobacteria) in certain physiological conditions. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2012, 7, 3887–3897. [Google Scholar]
  78. Dittmann, E.; Neilan, B.; Börner, T. Molecular biology of peptide and polyketide biosynthesis in cyanobacteria. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2001, 57, 467–473. [Google Scholar]
  79. Dembitsky, D.; Řezanka, T. Metabolites produced by nitrogen-fixing Nostoc species. Folia Microbiol. 2005, 50, 363–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Řezanka, T.; Dor, I.; Dembitsky, V. Fatty acid composition of six freshwater wild cyanobacterial species. Folia Microbiol. 2003, 48, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Mazur-Marzec, H.; Fidor, A.; Cegłowska, M.; Wieczerzak, E.; Kropidłowska, M.; Goua, M.; Macaskill, J.; Edwards, C. Cyanopeptolins with trypsin and chymotrypsin inhibitory activity from the cyanobacterium Nostoc edaphicum CCNP1411. Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Hrouzek, P.; Lukešowá, A.; Mareš, J.; Ventura, S. Description of the cyanobacterial genus Desmonostoc gen. nov. including D. muscorum comb. nov. as a distinct, phylogenetically coherent taxon related to the genus Nostoc. Fottea 2013, 13, 201–213. [Google Scholar]
  83. Lima, S.A.; Chipman, L.B.; Nicholson, A.L.; Chen, Y.-H.; Yee, B.A.; Yeo, G.W.; Coller, J.; Pasquinelli, A.E. Short poly(A) tails are a conserved feature of highly expressed genes. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2017, 24, 1057–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Monteiro, P.R.; Cavalcante do Amaral, S.; Siqueira, A.S.; Xavier, L.P.; Santos, A.V. Anabaenopeptins: What we know so far. Toxins 2021, 13, 522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Puente, X.S.; Sánchez, L.M.; Overall, C.M.; López-Otín, C. Human andmouse proteases: A comparative genomic approach. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2003, 4, 544–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Lopez-Otin, C.; Bond, J.S. Proteases: Multifunctional enzymes in life and disease. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 30433–30437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Harms, H.; Kurita, K.L.; Pan, L.; Wahome, P.G.; He, H.; Kinghorn, A.D.; Carter, G.T.; Linington, R.G. Discovery of anabaenopeptin 679 from freshwater algal bloom material: Insights into the structure-activity relationship of anabaenopeptin protease inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2016, 26, 4960–4965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Elkobi-Peer, S.; Carmeli, S. New Prenylated aeruginosin, microphycin, anabaenopeptin and micropeptin analogues from a Microcystis bloom material collected in Kibbutz Kfar Blum, Israel. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 2347–2375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ijerph 19 12346 g001 550
Figure 1. General structure of anabaenopeptins detected in cyanobacteria of the Nostoc genus. The number of variants with specific amino acids is given in the brackets.
Figure 1. General structure of anabaenopeptins detected in cyanobacteria of the Nostoc genus. The number of variants with specific amino acids is given in the brackets.
Ijerph 19 12346 g001
Ijerph 19 12346 g002 550
Figure 2. Fragment of the Nostoc edaphicum CCNP1411 chromosome, encoding the anabaenopeptin synthetase gene cluster (red).
Figure 2. Fragment of the Nostoc edaphicum CCNP1411 chromosome, encoding the anabaenopeptin synthetase gene cluster (red).
Ijerph 19 12346 g002
Ijerph 19 12346 g003 550
Figure 3. Enhanced product ion mass spectrum of the anabaenopeptin AP820Ne [Lys–Leu–Hph–MeAsn–Phe]CO–Val with precursor ion [M+H]+ at m/z 821. The mass signals were assigned to the following fragments: 821 [M+H]+, 803 [M+H–H2O]+, 793 [M+H–CO]+, 775 [M+H–CO–H2O]+, 722 [M+H–Val]+, 708 [M+H–Leu]+, 704 [M+H–Val–H2O]+, 693 [M+H–MeAsn]+, 678 [M+H–Val–CO]+, 660 [M+H–Hph]+, 643 [M+H–Hph–H2O]+, 550 [M+H–(Lys+CO+Val)]+, 547 [M+H–(Leu+Hph)]+, 532 [M+H–(Lys+CO+Val)–H2O]+, 519 [M+H–(Leu+Hph)–CO]+, 448 [M+H–Val–(Hph+Leu)]+, 420 [M+H–Val–(Hph+Leu)–H2O]+, 402 [M+H–Val–(Hph+Leu)–H2O–CO]+, 276 [Phe+MeAsn+H]+, 248 [Phe+MeAsn+H–CO]+, 173 [Lys+CO+NH2+H]+, 134 Hph immonium ion, 129 [Lys+2H]+, 120 Phe immonium ion, 86 Leu immonium ion, 84 Lys-derived ions+ and 72 Val immonium ion.
Figure 3. Enhanced product ion mass spectrum of the anabaenopeptin AP820Ne [Lys–Leu–Hph–MeAsn–Phe]CO–Val with precursor ion [M+H]+ at m/z 821. The mass signals were assigned to the following fragments: 821 [M+H]+, 803 [M+H–H2O]+, 793 [M+H–CO]+, 775 [M+H–CO–H2O]+, 722 [M+H–Val]+, 708 [M+H–Leu]+, 704 [M+H–Val–H2O]+, 693 [M+H–MeAsn]+, 678 [M+H–Val–CO]+, 660 [M+H–Hph]+, 643 [M+H–Hph–H2O]+, 550 [M+H–(Lys+CO+Val)]+, 547 [M+H–(Leu+Hph)]+, 532 [M+H–(Lys+CO+Val)–H2O]+, 519 [M+H–(Leu+Hph)–CO]+, 448 [M+H–Val–(Hph+Leu)]+, 420 [M+H–Val–(Hph+Leu)–H2O]+, 402 [M+H–Val–(Hph+Leu)–H2O–CO]+, 276 [Phe+MeAsn+H]+, 248 [Phe+MeAsn+H–CO]+, 173 [Lys+CO+NH2+H]+, 134 Hph immonium ion, 129 [Lys+2H]+, 120 Phe immonium ion, 86 Leu immonium ion, 84 Lys-derived ions+ and 72 Val immonium ion.
Ijerph 19 12346 g003
Ijerph 19 12346 g004 550
Figure 4. Key ROESY correlations in anabaenopeptin AP820Ne identified in Nostoc edaphicum CCNP1411.
Figure 4. Key ROESY correlations in anabaenopeptin AP820Ne identified in Nostoc edaphicum CCNP1411.
Ijerph 19 12346 g004
Table
Table 1. Nostoc strains that were identified as anabaenopeptins producers.
Table 1. Nostoc strains that were identified as anabaenopeptins producers.
SpeciesStrainPlace of IsolationReferences
Nostoc sp.CENA543Brazilian saline–alkaline lake, Nhecolândia, Pantanal[4]
Nostoc sp. Great Hungarian Plain[5]
N. punctiformeKVS11Blassia pusilla (lichen) Norway[55]
N. insulareCBT163 [56]
Nostoc sp.CBT599 [56]
Nostoc sp.CENA352Southeastern Brazilian coastal forest[7]
N. punctiformePCC73102Plant symbiont[6]
Nostoc sp.ATCC53789Macrozamia sp.[56]
N. calcicolaCB158Scotland, Arron Island (lichen)[56]
Nostoc sp.CENA358 [7]
Table
Table 2. The organisation of the anabaenopeptin synthetase gene cluster and domain organisation within the proteins encoded by these genes. Domains are abbreviated as follows: A, adenylation; C, condensation; D, docking; E, epimerisation; M, methyltransferase; PCP, peptidyl carrier protein.
Table 2. The organisation of the anabaenopeptin synthetase gene cluster and domain organisation within the proteins encoded by these genes. Domains are abbreviated as follows: A, adenylation; C, condensation; D, docking; E, epimerisation; M, methyltransferase; PCP, peptidyl carrier protein.
Locus_TagGeneBpDomain Organisation
HUN01_12160aptA[fragment 1] APCP
aptA[fragment 2]6957 CAPCPE
HUN01_12150aptB3231 CAPCP
HUN01_12145aptC[fragment 1] CAPCP
aptC[fragment 2]7947 CAMPCP
HUN01_12140aptD4215DCAPCP
Table
Table 3. Amino acid residues in the substrate-binding pocket of the adenylation domains, encoded by the aptABCD gene cluster, according to GrsA Phe numbering. Amino acids in brackets mark inconsistencies with references [65,72]; position 331 was not taken into account, as in Challis et al. [72], this position was not considered.
Table 3. Amino acid residues in the substrate-binding pocket of the adenylation domains, encoded by the aptABCD gene cluster, according to GrsA Phe numbering. Amino acids in brackets mark inconsistencies with references [65,72]; position 331 was not taken into account, as in Challis et al. [72], this position was not considered.
Proposed AA
Activated		Residue Position According to GrsA Phe
Numbering
235236239278299301322330331
aptA[fragment 1]Leu/Ile/ValDAFFLG[A]TF
aptA[fragment 2]LysD[T]E[Q]IGS[I]I
aptBLeu*DA[L]FLG[A]VF
aptC[fragment 1]PheDL[G]TIG[C]VI
aptC[fragment 2]AsnD[A]TKVGEVG
aptDPheDAWT[V]AGVC
Leu* stands for Leu or Ile.
Table
Table 4. Anabaenopeptin variants identified in Nostoc edaphicum CCNP1411.
Table 4. Anabaenopeptin variants identified in Nostoc edaphicum CCNP1411.
NameCalculated MW[M+H]+
m/z		Amino Acid Sequence
1 23456
AP806Ne806.43807.43ValCOLysLeu*HphAsnPhe
AP820Ne820.45821.44ValCOLysLeu*HphMeAsnPhe
AP SA6834.46835.47Leu*COLysLeu*HphMeAsnPhe
AP836Ne836.44837.50ValCOLysLeu*HtyMeAsnPhe
Leu* stands for Leu or Ile.
Table
Table 5. NMR spectroscopic data for anabaenopeptin AP820Ne.
Table 5. NMR spectroscopic data for anabaenopeptin AP820Ne.
ResiduePositionδH (J in Hz)ResiduePositionδH (J in Hz)
ValNH
1
2
3
4		6.62 (d, 6.7)
3.85 (m)
1.53 (m)
1.11 (d, 6.7)
1.02 (d, 6.9)		HphNH
1
2
3
4/4′
5/5′
6		8.82 (d, 3.9)
4.03 (t, 7.7)
2.73, 2.61
1.72 (m)
7.11 (m)
7.32 (d, 7.3)
7.27 (m)
LysNH
1
2
3
4
5
ε-NH		7.49 (d, 6.1)
3.53 (m)
1.42 (m)
1.33 (m)
1.42 (m)
2.69 (m)
6.05 (m)		N-MeAsnN-CH31
2
δ-NH2		1.81 (s)
5.33 (dd, 9.8, 3.3)
2.41, 2.35 (m)
7.49, 7.03 (m)


Leu*NH
1
2
3
4
5		7.06 (m)
3.96 (d, 6.6)
1.50 (m)
1.73 (m)
0.95 (m)
0.77 (dd, 6.8, 2.3)		PheNH
1
2
3/3′
4/4′
5		9.02 (d, 8.9)
4.32 (m)
3.30, 2.77 (m)
7.01 (m)
7.19 (d, 7.6)
7.15 (m)
Leu* stands for Leu or Ile.
Table
Table 6. The activities of the peptides were assessed in serine proteases (chymotrypsin (CHY), trypsin (TRY), elastase (E), and thrombin (Thr)) and carboxypeptidase A (CPA) inhibition assays: –, not active (inhibition below 10%); *, low activity (inhibition between 10–30%); **, medium activity (inhibition between 31–70%).
Table 6. The activities of the peptides were assessed in serine proteases (chymotrypsin (CHY), trypsin (TRY), elastase (E), and thrombin (Thr)) and carboxypeptidase A (CPA) inhibition assays: –, not active (inhibition below 10%); *, low activity (inhibition between 10–30%); **, medium activity (inhibition between 31–70%).
NameEnzyme Inhibition (IC50 [µM])
TRYCHYECPAThr
AP SA6––5.54.5*
AP820Ne––22.73.5**
AP806Ne–––21.1*
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Konkel, R.; Grabski, M.; Cegłowska, M.; Wieczerzak, E.; Węgrzyn, G.; Mazur-Marzec, H. Anabaenopeptins from Nostoc edaphicum CCNP1411. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 12346. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912346

AMA Style

Konkel R, Grabski M, Cegłowska M, Wieczerzak E, Węgrzyn G, Mazur-Marzec H. Anabaenopeptins from Nostoc edaphicum CCNP1411. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(19):12346. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912346

Chicago/Turabian Style

Konkel, Robert, Michał Grabski, Marta Cegłowska, Ewa Wieczerzak, Grzegorz Węgrzyn, and Hanna Mazur-Marzec. 2022. "Anabaenopeptins from Nostoc edaphicum CCNP1411" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 19: 12346. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912346

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop