The Moderating Role of Teamwork Engagement and Teambuilding on the Effect of Teamwork Competence as a Predictor of Innovation Behaviors among University Students
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Framework
2.1. Innovation Behaviors in HE
2.2. IWB and Teamwork-Related Factors
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Participants
3.2. Procedure
3.3. Instruments
3.3.1. Innovation Behaviors (IWBs)
3.3.2. Teamwork Competence (TWC)
3.3.3. Teamwork Engagement (TWE)
3.3.4. Team Building (TB)
3.3.5. Control Variables
3.4. Data Analyses
4. Results
4.1. Descriptive, Correlacional and Internal Consistency Analyses
4.2. Correlational and Internal Consistency Analyses
4.3. Multiple Additive Moderation Analysis
5. Discussion
5.1. Implications to Practice and Education
5.2. Limitations and Suggestions for Further Research
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Carayannis, E.G. Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- OECD. The Innovation Imperative: Contributing to Productivity, Growth and Well–Being; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2015; pp. 1–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diebolt, C.; Hippe, R. The long–run impact of human capital on innovation and economic grow in the regions of Europe. In Human Capital and Regional Development in Europe. Frontiers in Economic History; Diebolt, C., Hippe, R., Eds.; Springer: Cham, NY, USA, 2022; pp. 85–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anderson, N.; Potočnik, K.; Zhou, J. Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of–the–science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. J. Manag. 2014, 40, 1297–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duradoni, M.; Di Fabio, A. Intrapreneurial Self–Capital and Sustainable Innovative Behavior within Organizations. Sustainability 2019, 11, 322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abu El-Ella, N.; Bessant, J.; Pinkwart, A. Changing Change Management: The New Innovation Imperative. In Management of Permanent Change; Albach, H., Meffert, H., Pinkwart, A., Reichwald, R., Eds.; Springer Gabler: Wiesbaden, Germany, 2015; pp. 105–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Šproch, F.; Nevima, J. Increasing Competitiveness through Innovation in an Industrial Enterprise—A Case Study of the Company Massag. Adv. Sci.Technol. Res. J. 2021, 15, 110–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khyareh, M.M.; Rostami, N. Macroeconomic Conditions, Innovation and Competitiveness. J. Knowl. Econ. 2022, 13, 1321–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- United Nations General Assembly. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. 2015. Available online: https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E (accessed on 19 July 2022).
- Cillo, V.; Petruzzelli, A.M.; Ardito, L.; Del Giudice, M. Understanding sustainable innovation: A systematic literature review. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2019, 26, 1012–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lopes, J.M.; Gomes, S.; Pacheco, R.; Monteiro, E.; Santos, C. Drivers of Sustainable Innovation Strategies for Increased Competition among Companies. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bigliardi, B.; Filippelli, S. A review of the literature on innovation in the agrofood industry: Sustainability, smartness and health. EJIM 2022, 25, 589–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bonesso, S.; Cortellazzo, L.; Gerli, F. Current Trends in Innovation Management and the Role of Human Capital. In Behavioral Competencies for Innovation; Bonesso, S., Cortellazzo, L., Gerli, F., Eds.; Palgrave Pivot: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rangus, K.; Černe, M. The impact of leadership influence tactics and employee openness toward others on innovation performance. R&D Manag. 2019, 49, 168–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Widmann, A.; Mulder, R.H.; König, C. Team learning behaviours as predictors of innovative work behaviour–a longitudinal study. IOM 2019, 21, 298–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, M.; Zhang, X.; Ng, B.C.S.; Zhong, L. The dual influences of team cooperative and competitive orientations on the relationship between empowering leadership and team innovative behaviors. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2022, 102, 103160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bibi, S.; Khan, A.; Qian, H.; Garavelli, A.C.; Natalicchio, A.; Capolupo, P. Innovative Climate, a Determinant of Competitiveness and Business Performance in Chinese Law Firms: The Role of Firm Size and Age. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El–Kassar, A.N.; Dagher, G.K.; Lythreatis, S.; Azakir, M. Antecedents and consequences of knowledge hiding: The roles of HR practices, organizational support for creativity, creativity, innovative work behavior, and task performance. J. Bus. Res. 2022, 140, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seeck, H.; Diehl, M.R. A literature review on HRM and innovation–taking stock and future directions. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2017, 28, 913–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bos–Nehles, A.; Renkema, M.; Janssen, M. HRM and innovative work behaviour: A systematic literature review. Pers. Rev. 2017, 46, 1228–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, C.H.; Sanders, K. HRM and innovation: A multi-level organisational learning perspective. Hum. Resour. Manag. J. 2017, 27, 300–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lui, S.; Lai, J.; Luo, B.N.; Moran, P. Will goal clarity lower team innovation? A moderated mediation model of inter–team trust. J. Knowl. Manag. 2022. ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheung, S.Y.; Gong, Y.; Wang, M.; Zhou, L.; Shi, J. When and how does functional diversity influence team innovation? The mediating role of knowledge sharing and the moderation role of affect-based trust in a team. Hum. Relat. 2016, 69, 1507–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Renkema, M.; de Leede, J.; Van Zyl, L.E. High-involvement HRM and innovative behaviour: The mediating roles of nursing staff’s autonomy and affective commitment. J. Nurs. Manag. 2021, 29, 2499–2514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, F.; Chow, I.; Gong, Y.; Wang, H. Mediating links between HRM bundle and individual innovative behavior. J. Manag. Organ. 2019, 25, 157–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanz-Valle, R.; Jiménez–Jiménez, D. HRM and product innovation: Does innovative work behaviour mediate that relationship? Manag. Decis. 2018, 56, 1417–1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hero, L.M.; Lindfors, E.; Taatila, V. Individual innovation competence: A systematic review and future research agenda. Int. J. High. Educ. 2017, 6, 103–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keinänen, M.M.; Kairisto–Mertanen, L. Researching learning environments and students’ innovation competences. Educ. Train. 2019, 61, 17–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lambriex-Schmitz, P.; Van der Klink, M.R.; Beausaert, S.; Bijker, M.; Segers, M. When innovation in education works: Stimulating teachers’ innovative work behaviour. Int. J. Train. Dev. 2020, 24, 118–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thneibat, M. The effect of perceived rewards on radical innovation: The mediating role of knowledge management in Indian manufacturing firms. Heliyon 2021, 7, e07155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- West, M.A.; Farr, J.L. Innovation and Creativity at Work: Psychological and Organizational Strategies; John Wiley Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martín-Hernández, P.; Ramos, J.; Zornoza, A.; Lira, E.M.; Peiró, J.M. Mindfulness and job control as moderators of the relationship between demands and innovative work behaviours. JWOP 2020, 36, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Devloo, T.; Anseel, F.; De Beuckelaer, A.; Salanova, M. Keep the fire burning: Reciprocal gains of basic need satisfaction, intrinsic motivation and innovative work behaviour. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 2015, 24, 491–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Janssen, O. Job demands, perceptions of effort–reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 2000, 73, 287–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Janssen, O. Innovative behaviour and job involvement at the price of conflict and less satisfactory relations with co-workers. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 2003, 76, 347–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martín, P.; Potočnik, K.; Fras, A.B. Determinants of students’ innovation in higher education. Stud. High. Educ. 2017, 42, 1229–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amelink, C.T.; Davis, K.A.; Watford, B. Learning experiences that facilitate innovation and workforce preparation: Exploring the impact of in-class and extracurricular activities. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 2019, 35, 1642–1655. [Google Scholar]
- Ngugi, J.; Goosen, L. Modelling course–design characteristics, self-regulated learning and the mediating effect of knowledge–sharing behavior as drivers of individual innovative behavior. Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ. 2018, 14, em1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhong, Z.; Hu, D.; Zheng, F.; Ding, S.; Luo, A. Relationship between information-seeking behavior and innovative behavior in Chinese nursing students. Nurse Educ. Today 2018, 63, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Iddris, F.; Mensah, P.O.; Asiedu, R.; Mensah, H.K. Student innovation capability in virtual team projects: Lessons learnt from COVID-19 pandemic era. Int. J. Innov. 2022; ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chankseliani, M.; McCowan, T. Higher education and the Sustainable Development Goals. High. Educ. 2021, 81, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tierney, W.G.; Lanford, M. Conceptualizing Innovation in Higher Education. In Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research; Paulsen, M., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; Volume 31, pp. 1–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on a Renewed EU Agenda for Higher Education, Brussels, 30 May 2017. Available online: https://eur–lex.europa.eu/legal–content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52017DC0247 (accessed on 20 July 2022).
- Ozis, F.; Parks, S.L.I.; Sills, D.L.; Akca, M.; Kirby, C. Teaching sustainability: Does style matter? Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2022, 23, 194–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chiva-Bartoll, O.; Santos-Pastor, M.L.; Martínez–Muñoz, L.F.; Ruiz–Montero, P.J. Contributions of Service-Learning to more inclusive and less gender–biased Physical Education: The views of Spanish Physical Education Teacher Education students. J. Gend. Stud. 2021, 30, 699–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martínez–Casanovas, M.; Ruíz–Munzón, N.; Buil-Fabregá, M. Higher education: The best practices for fostering competences for sustainable development through the use of active learning methodologies. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2022, 23, 703–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santos–Pastor, M.L.; Ruiz-Montero, P.J.; Chiva–Bartoll, O.; Baena-Extremera, A.; Martínez-Muñoz, L.F. Environmental Education in Initial Training: Effects of a Physical Activities and Sports in the Natural Environment Program for Sustainable Development. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 867899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Betti, A.; Biderbost, P.; García Domonte, A. Can active learning techniques simultaneously develop students’ hard and soft skills? Evidence from an international relations class. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0265408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martín-Hernández, P.; Gil–Lacruz, M.; Gil–Lacruz, A.I.; Azkue–Beteta, J.L.; Lira, E.M.; Cantarero, L. Fostering University Students’ Engagement in Teamwork and Innovation Behaviors through Game–Based Learning (GBL). Sustainability 2021, 13, 13573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamari, J.; Shernoff, D.J.; Rowe, E.; Coller, B.; Asbell–Clarke, J.; Edwards, T. Challenging games help students learn: An empirical study on engagement, flow and immersion in game–based learning. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016, 54, 170–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hammedi, W.; Leclercq, T.; Poncin, I.; Alkire, L. Uncovering the dark side of gamification at work: Impacts on engagement and well-being. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 122, 256–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zainuddin, Z.; Chu, S.K.; Shujahat, M.; Perera, C.J. The impact of gamification on learning and instruction: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Educ. Res. Rev. 2020, 30, 100326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, R.; Ritzhaupt, A.D.; Sommer, M.; Zhu, J.; Stephen, A.; Valle, N.; Hampton, J.; Li, J. The impact of gamification in educational settings on student learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 2020, 68, 1875–1901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalogiannakis, M.; Papadakis, S.; Zourmpakis, A.-I. Gamification in Science Education. A Systematic Review of the Literature. Educ. Sci. 2021, 11, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qian, M.; Clark, K.R. Game–based Learning and 21st century skills: A review of recent research. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016, 63, 50–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sousa, M.J.; Rocha, Á. Leadership styles and skills developed through game–based learning. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 94, 360–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ifenthaler, D.; Eseryel, D.; Ge, X. Assessment for game-based learning. In Assessment in Game-Based Learning; Ifenthaler, D., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2021; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Landers, R.N. Developing a theory of gamified learning: Linking serious games and gamification of learning. Simul. Gaming 2014, 45, 752–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sailer, M.; Homner, L. The Gamification of Learning: A Meta–analysis. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 2020, 32, 77–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burrus, J.; Jackson, T.; Xi, N.; Steinberg, J. Identifying the most important 21st century workforce competencies: An analysis of the Occupational Information Network (O* NET). ETS Res. Rep. Ser. 2013, 2, i-55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geisinger, K.F. 21st century skills: What are they and how do we assess them? Appl. Meas. Educ. 2016, 29, 245–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stevens, M.J.; Campion, M.A. Staffing work teams: Development and validation of a selection test for teamwork settings. J. Manag. 1999, 25, 207–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pazos, P.; Pérez-López, M.C.; González-López, M.J. Examining teamwork competencies and team performance in experiential entrepreneurship education: Emergent intragroup conflict as a learning triggering event. Educ. Train. 2022, 64, 461–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Donia, M.B.; O’Neill, T.A.; Brutus, S. The longitudinal effects of peer feedback in the development and transfer of student teamwork skills. Learn. Individ. Differ. 2018, 61, 87–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brutus, S.; Donia, M. Improving the effectiveness of students in groups with a centralized peer evaluation system. Acad. Manag. Learn. Educ. 2010, 9, 652–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, X.; Liu, X.; Sha, J. How does the entrepreneurship education influence the students’ innovation? Testing on the multiple mediation model. Front. Psychol. 2019, 10, 1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, S.; Wu, H. The performance impact of new ventures in working environment and innovation behavior from the perspective of personality psychology. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 734014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jankelová, N.; Skorková, Z.; Joniaková, Z.; Némethová, I. A diverse organizational culture and its impact on innovative work behavior of municipal employees. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johari, A.; Abdul Wahat, N.W.; Zaremohzzabieh, Z. Innovative work behavior among teachers in Malaysia: The effects of teamwork, principal support, and humor. Asian J. Univ. Educ. 2021, 17, 72–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schaufeli, W.B.; Salanova, M.; González–Romá, V.; Bakker, A.B. The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. J. Happiness Stud. 2002, 3, 71–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berraies, S.; Chouiref, A. Exploring the effect of team climate on knowledge management in teams through team work engagement: Evidence from knowledge-intensive firms. J. Knowl. Manag. 2022; ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carmona-Halty, M.; Salanova, M.; Llorens, S.; Schaufeli, W.B. Linking positive emotions and academic performance: The mediated role of academic psychological capital and academic engagement. Curr. Psychol. 2021, 40, 2938–2947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Costa, P.; Passos, A.M.; Bakker, A. Empirical validation of the team work engagement construct. J. Pers. Psychol. 2014, 13, 34–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Torrente, P.; Salanova, M.; Llorens, S.; Schaufeli, W.B. Teams make it work: How team work engagement mediates between social resources and performance in teams. Psicothema 2013, 24, 106–112. [Google Scholar]
- Hernaus, T.; Černe, M.; Vujčić, M.T. Leader–member innovative work behavior (in) congruence and task performance: The moderating role of work engagement. Eur. Manag. J. 2022; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jason, V.; Geetha, S.N. Regulatory focus and innovative work behavior: The role of work engagement. Curr. Psychol. 2021, 40, 2791–2803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, H.; Li, M.; Qiu, X. Employee engagement and innovative work behavior among Chinese millennials: Mediating and moderating role of work–life balance and psychological empowerment. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 942580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klein, C.; Diaz Granados, D.; Salas, E.; Le, H.; Burke, C.S.; Lyons, R.; Goodwin, G.F. Does team building work? Small Group Res. 2009, 40, 181–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fodor, S.; Balázs, B. An empirical study on key factors affecting user engagement in a gamified team building environment. Int. J. Serious Games 2020, 7, 81–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hakanen, M.; Soudunsaari, A. Building Trust in High–Performing Teams. Technol. Innov. 2012, 2, 38–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martín–Hernández, P.; Gil-Lacruz, A.I.; Gil-Lacruz, M.; Tesán, A.C.; Azkue, J.L. Working and Feeling as a team using gamification amongst university students. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies—EDULEARN20 Proceedings, Palma de Mallorca, Spain, 6–7 July 2020; Chova, L., López, A., Candel, I., Eds.; IATED Academy: Palma de Mallorca, Spain, 2020; pp. 1729–1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, D. An Examination of Management Practices as Predictors of Employee Work Engagement. Master’s Thesis, San Jose State University, San Jose, CA, USA, May 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Costa, P.L.; Passos, A.M.; Bakker, A.B. Direct and contextual influence of team conflict on team resources, team work engagement, and team performance. Negot. Confl. Manag. Res. 2015, 8, 211–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martín-Hernández, P. Juego serio “El grupo al rescate”. In Proyecto de Innovación Docente, La Gamificación Como Herramienta de Fomento del Aprendizaje Activo y la Construcción de Equipo (Team Building) PIIDUZ_17_159; Vicerrectorado de Política Académica, Universidad de Zaragoza: Zaragoza, Spain, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Faul, F.; Erdfelder, E.; Lang, A.G.; Buchner, A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 2007, 39, 175–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Faul, F.; Erdfelder, E.; Buchner, A.; Lang, A.G. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav. Res. Methods 2009, 41, 1149–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Martín-Hernández, P.; Azkue, J.L.; Agut, S. Game base learning in psychology education: Improving undergraduates competence for team working. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (EDULEARN18), Palma de Mallorca, Spain, 2–4 July 2018; Chova, L., López, A., Candel, I., Eds.; IATED Academy: Palma de Mallorca, Spain, 2018; pp. 9728–9732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Field, A. Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics, 4th ed.; Sage: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Salanova, M.; Llorens, S.; Cifre, E.; Martínez, I.M.; Schaufeli, W.B. Perceived collective efficacy, subjective well–being and task performance among electronic work groups: An experimental study. Small Group Res. 2003, 34, 43–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Costa, P.L.; Passos, A.M.; Bakker, A.B. The work engagement grid: Predicting engagement from two core dimensions. J. Manag. Psychol. 2016, 31, 774–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahmadani, V.G.; Schaufeli, W.B.; Stouten, J.; Zhang, Z.; Zulkarnain, Z. Engaging leadership and its implication for work engagement and job outcomes at the individual and team level: A multi–level longitudinal study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salas, E.; Rozell, D.; Mullen, B.; Driskell, J.E. The effect of team building on performance: An integration. Small Group Res. 1999, 30, 309–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aga, D.A.; Noorderhaven, N.; Vallejo, B. Transformational leadership and project success: The mediating role of team building. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2016, 34, 806–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hultin, Y.X.; Zhang, C.; Hu, Y. Does Team Building Support the Creation of High–Performing Teams. Master’s Thesis, School of Economics and Management, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, 2017. Available online: https://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/download?func=downloadFile&recordOId=8926400&fileOId=8926402 (accessed on 27 July 2022).
- Bolin, J.H. Andrew F. Hayes (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press. J. Educ. Meas. 2014, 51, 335–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hayes, A.F.; Rockwood, N.J. Regression–based statistical mediation and moderation analysis in clinical research: Observations, recommendations, and implementation. Behav. Res. Ther. 2017, 98, 39–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spector, P.E. Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend? Organ. Res. Methods 2006, 9, 221–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Woods, S.A.; Mustafa, M.J.; Anderson, N.; Sayer, B. Innovative work behavior and personality traits: Examining the moderating effects of organizational tenure. J. Manag. Psychol 2018, 33, 29–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Occupational Therapy (N = 14) | Physiotherapy (N = 47) | Psychology (N = 54) | Social Work (N = 30) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Female (N = 103, 72.5%) | 10 | 32 | 47 | 14 |
Male (N = 39, 27.5%) | 2 | 14 | 7 | 16 |
Occupational Therapy (1) | Physiotherapy (2) | Psychology (3) | Social Work (4) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | Mean (SD) | N | Mean (SD) | N | Mean (SD) | N | Mean (SD) | F | p | |
Innovation Work Behavior (IWB) | 12 | 4.99 (0.94) | 46 | 4.72 (0.78) | 54 | 5.06 (0.78) | 30 | 5.33 (1.03) | 2.31 | 0.079 |
Teamwork Competence (TWC) | 12 | 5.01 (0.60) | 46 | 4.78 (0.54) | 54 | 4.99 (0.90) | 30 | 5.08 (0.51) | 1.83 | 0.144 |
Teamwork Engagement (TWE) | 12 | 5.08 (0.91) | 46 | 5.03 (0.68) | 54 | 5.93 (0.68) | 30 | 5.37 (0.91) | 1.89 | 0.145 |
Team Building (TB) | 12 | 4.96 (0.73) | 46 | 4.71 (0.53) | 54 | 5.08 (0.68) | 30 | 4.98 (0.81) | 2.24 | 0.086 |
Variable | M (SD) | α | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Age | 20.58 (1.61) | - | ||||||
2. Gender | - | - | −0.07 | 1 | ||||
3. Innovation Work Behaviors prior levels | 4.52 (0.87) | 0.92 | 0.68 | −0.10 | 1 | |||
4. Innovation Work Behaviors (IWB) | 5.00 (1.02) | 0.95 | 0.72 | −0.14 | 0.62 ** | 1 | ||
5. Teamwork Competence (TWC) | 4.94 (0.59) | 0.92 | 0.72 | −0.15 | 0.48 ** | 0.72 ** | 1 | |
6. Teamwork Engagement (TWE) | 5.25 (0.85) | 0.95 | 0.10 | −0.23 | 0.40 ** | 0.57 ** | 0.63 ** | 1 |
7. Team Building (TB) | 4.93 (0.74) | 0.93 | 0.60 | −0.34 | 0.28 ** | 0.55 ** | 0.66 ** | 0.72 ** |
Variable | β | SE | t | p | 95% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LLCI | ULCI | |||||
Age | 0.00 | 0.03 | −0.14 | 0.89 | −0.07 | 0.06 |
Gender | −0.20 | 0.12 | −1.70 | 0.09 | −0.42 | 0.03 |
Innovation Work Behaviors prior levels | 0.41 | 0.07 | 6.01 | 0.00 | 0.28 | 0.55 |
Teamwork Competence (TWC) | 0.78 | 0.13 | 6.10 | 0.00 | 0.53 | 1.04 |
Teamwork Engagement (TWE) | 0.17 | 0.09 | 1.80 | 0.07 | −0.02 | 0.35 |
Team Building (TB) | −0.01 | 0.12 | −0.07 | 0.95 | −0.24 | 0.23 |
TWC × TWE | 0.37 | 0.12 | 3.01 | 0.00 | 0.13 | 0.61 |
TWC × TB | −0.46 | 0.15 | −3.03 | 0.00 | −0.76 | −0.16 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Martín-Hernández, P.; Gil-Lacruz, M.; Tesán-Tesán, A.C.; Pérez-Nebra, A.R.; Azkue-Beteta, J.L.; Rodrigo-Estevan, M.L. The Moderating Role of Teamwork Engagement and Teambuilding on the Effect of Teamwork Competence as a Predictor of Innovation Behaviors among University Students. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 12047. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912047
Martín-Hernández P, Gil-Lacruz M, Tesán-Tesán AC, Pérez-Nebra AR, Azkue-Beteta JL, Rodrigo-Estevan ML. The Moderating Role of Teamwork Engagement and Teambuilding on the Effect of Teamwork Competence as a Predictor of Innovation Behaviors among University Students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(19):12047. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912047
Chicago/Turabian StyleMartín-Hernández, Pilar, Marta Gil-Lacruz, Ana Cristina Tesán-Tesán, Amalia Raquel Pérez-Nebra, Juan Luis Azkue-Beteta, and María Luz Rodrigo-Estevan. 2022. "The Moderating Role of Teamwork Engagement and Teambuilding on the Effect of Teamwork Competence as a Predictor of Innovation Behaviors among University Students" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 19: 12047. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912047