Next Article in Journal
Patients’ and Relatives’ Experiences of Delirium in the Intensive Care Unit—A Qualitative Study
Previous Article in Journal
Global Research Trends of Artificial Intelligence on Histopathological Images: A 20-Year Bibliometric Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Association between Smartphone Addiction and Suicide

1
Department of Public Health, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea
2
Institute of Health Services Research, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea
3
Department of Preventive Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea
4
Department of Healthcare Management, Graduate School of Public Health, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(18), 11600; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811600
Submission received: 20 July 2022 / Revised: 1 September 2022 / Accepted: 2 September 2022 / Published: 15 September 2022

Abstract

:
Objective: This study aimed to explore the associations between smartphone overdependence (smartphone addiction) and suicidal ideation and attempts among Korean adolescents to acknowledge the risk of smartphone overuse. Methods: Data were obtained from the results of the 2020 Korea Youth Risk Behavior Web-based Survey. Smartphone addiction was categorized into three groups: adolescents who scored less than 23 were categorized as the general user group and formed the reference, those with scores of 23–30 were categorized as the potential-risk user group, and those with scores higher than 31 were categorized under the high-risk user group. Suicidal ideation and suicide attempt were identified as dependent variables in the present study. Multiple logistic regression was used to analyze the relationship between SA and suicidal ideation and suicide attempt status among Korean adolescents. Results: This study included 41,173 general users of smartphones, 12,142 potential-risk users, and 1633 high-risk users from among 54,948 adolescents who were middle- and high-school students. Adolescents with potentially risky smartphone use showed a higher likelihood of suicidal ideation (OR: 1.50, CI: 1.42–1.60). Similarly, adolescents with high-risk smartphone use showed a significant risk of suicidal ideation (OR: 2.49, CI: 2.21–2.81) and suicide attempt (OR: 1.87, CI: 1.48–2.37) compared to the adolescents who were general users. Conclusion: Our study results encourage parents and social workers to acknowledge that adolescents’ smartphone addiction leads to a higher risk to their mental health, wherein they may engage in suicidal ideation and even resort to a suicide attempt.

1. Introduction

Suicide is the second leading cause of death among adolescents globally [1]. Comparing the age-standardized suicide rate among Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries (OECD standard population per 100,000), Korea recorded the highest level at 24.6 (as of 2019) compared to the OECD average of 11 [2]. Since 2011, suicide has been the leading cause of death among young people in Korea from adolescents up to those in their 30s [3]. The suicide rate has been gradually increasing year by year in the last two decades, which adds to the global burden of disease.
Nowadays, smartphones have become an essential and basic necessity of our lives. Nevertheless, they also have several negative effects on adolescents in their growing ages. There are many studies [4,5,6,7,8,9] reporting that adolescents’ smartphone overuse is associated with their self-esteem, life stress, anxiety, depression, impulsivity, friends and social communication conflict, and family communication and conflict. Further, smartphone addiction and becoming “hikikomori” at a young age are becoming a significant problem during the COVID-19 pandemic [4,5,6,7,8,9]. Thus, adolescents’ smartphone addiction is a worldwide problem that humans are facing, but because of the increasingly essential nature of smartphones, families are unable to directly restrict its use. In addition, parents have not fully understood and realized the serious harm of smartphone overuse for their children.
Internet overuse is also a manifestation of Internet addiction in a broad sense, depending not only on the social use of the Web but also on gambling and online shopping on the Internet and Internet porn addiction. The drama of the latter type of addiction lies in the fact that adolescents are in a transition period, which overtakes them during puberty, and then adolescents develop antisocial ideas about sex, which can become ingrained and remain as a trace that may have a harmful enduring effect [10,11,12]. During their sensitive period of growth, adolescents are both physically and psychologically immature. Previous research has reported that the physical processes that make adolescents more prone to poor decision-making and cause difficulty in emotional regulation and self-control are because of structural complexity and the imbalance of structural and functional changes between the subcortical areas generated by emotion- and pleasure-related experiences. A possible mechanism for the above phenomenon is that the prefrontal cortex area that is responsible for the top–down regulation of emotions and impulses has not reached its complete maturity by adolescence [13,14,15,16].
A national surveillance study on Internet addiction shows that Internet addiction is more harmful and dangerous than other forms such as alcoholism, smoking, and sexual addiction that are widespread among the population. Internet addiction contributes to depression, behavioral changes, social communication disorders, and anxiety, and the unreal virtual environment of the Internet often creates an abnormal psychological state that is alienated from real life, causing depression so that individuals cannot adapt to the real-life environment [17,18]. Furthermore, smartphone overuse has negative effects and introduces risks that are difficult for adolescents to handle, such as internet bullying, pornography, and low academic achievement [19,20]. The negative effects include poor peer and family relationships, vision loss, etc. [5,21]. Therefore, a variety of drastic physical, psychological, and social relation changes that adolescents have no control over and cannot avoid occur as a result of smartphone addiction [22]. The addiction could grow extremely hard to control, both mentally and physically; the resulting stressful events and experiences can cause adolescents to mentally break down, consider self-harm, have suicidal thoughts, and even resort to suicide attempts.
A few studies have found a correlation between smartphone overuse and self-harm and suicidal ideation [23,24,25,26,27]; many previous studies have also found related potential risk factors. These include depression, anxiety, impulsiveness, family related issues, sociodemographic status, academic stress, and substance use [6,8,28]. Moreover, men with high levels of internet addiction are at higher risk of suicide than women. It can be said that Internet addiction is a mediating variable in terms of gender [29,30]. Gaming was associated with Internet problems in men, but aggression and impulsivity showed associations with smartphone use in women [31]. However, there were no studies that directly explored the smartphone addiction scale to identify associations between smartphone addiction and both suicidal ideation and suicide attempts among adolescents. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to spread awareness among parents and social workers about the vicious circle of smartphone overuse and risk that can negatively impact adolescents’ lives. Further steps can be taken to prevent, moderate, and supervise the tendencies of adolescent smartphone use.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Participants

The data were obtained from the results of the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s 2020 Korea Youth Risk Behavior Web-based Survey (KYRBWS), known as KYRBWS-XVI—an anonymous self-report online survey. This survey aimed to calculate statistics on the health behavior of Korean adolescents. It was used as basic data necessary for the planning and evaluation of health promotion projects. The 2020 (16th) survey explored 103 questions in 15 areas, including smoking, drinking, and physical activity, and drew 93 indicators. The survey was conducted with 793 schools (398 middle schools, 395 high schools) and 54,948 people participating in the survey due to Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and the participation rate was 94.9–95.3% based on the number of students.

2.2. Suicidal Ideation and Suicide Attempt

The dependent variables of the present study were both suicidal ideation and suicide attempt. Suicidal ideation was inferred based on the question: “At any time within the last 12 months, did you think about trying to kill yourself?”; the responses were “Yes” and “No”. Suicide attempt was questioned by “At any time with in the last 12 months, did you ever attempt suicide?”, and the responses were one of the following: (1) “No, I never attempted suicide” or (2) “Yes, I have attempted suicide at least once”.

2.3. Smartphone Addiction

Smartphone addiction was determined by adolescents’ answers to statements regarding the ten items of the smartphone dependence screening tool, which was developed from the KYRBS’s self-reporting of the smartphone addiction scale. This scale had a total of 40 points answered on a four-point Likert scale, where 1 indicates a strong disagreement with the statement and 4 indicates a strong agreement with the statement. The ten items of the scale included (1) It fails every time you reduce the smartphone hours; (2) It is difficult to control the usage time of smartphone; (3) It is difficult to keep proper smartphone usage time; (4) It is hard to focus on other things if you have a smartphone next to you; (5) Thinking of smartphone does not leave your head; (6) I strongly desire to use smartphone; (7) I have problems with my health because of smartphone use; (8) I have a hard time with my family because of smartphone use; (9) Due to the use of smartphones, I have experienced severe conflicts in friends, colleagues, and social relationships; and (10) Due to the smartphone, there are difficulties in performing tasks (such as study or work). The smartphone addiction levels were ascertained based on the scores. Smartphone addiction was categorized into three groups: adolescents who scored less than 23 were categorized as the general user group for reference, those with scores of 23–30 were categorized as the potential-risk user group, and those with scores of higher than 31 were the high-risk user group [32]. Smartphone addiction categorization was according to the Korean Internet Addiction Prevention Center.

2.4. Covariates

Other confounding variables representing the study participants’ sociodemographic characteristics were gender, school grade (middle school, high school), school achievement (high, moderate, and low), subjective economic status (high, average, and low), and family living structure (living with family or without family). Health-related characteristics were sleeping duration for overcoming fatigue (enough, normal, not enough), consumption of fast food and physical activity (≤2 times/week, ≥3 times/week), tobacco use (Yes or No for the question: “Do have tobacco use experience?”) and alcohol consumption (response options were Yes or No) within a month, and alcohol drinking experience (in the last 30 days). When analyzing the relationship between smartphone addiction and suicidal ideation and suicide attempt across the study participants, all covariates were examined by the responses to the corresponding question.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

A chi-squared test was used to evaluate the basic characteristics of the participants. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between smartphone addiction risk and suicidal ideation and attempt. Results included odds ratio (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Results from analysis of variance and tests of independence were also valid. The trend test was conducted to identify the relationship between the independent and dependent variables. All analyses were conducted using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). p-values lower than 0.05 were considered significant.

3. Results

This study included 54,948 adolescents belonging to middle and high school (middle school: 28,961; high school: 25,987) in South Korea. Of all participants, 41,173 (74.9%) were categorized as the general user group, 12,142 (22.1%) as the potential-risk group, and 1633 (3.0%) as the high-risk user group (Table 1). Girls’ scores exceeded boys in terms of potential and high risk of overusing smartphones (potential risk: 6903 (56.9%), high risk: 1040 (63.7%)).
Table 2 indicates the general characteristics of the participants. Adolescents who experienced suicidal ideation within the last 12 months included 5979 (10.9%) of 54,978 participants. By category, 3680 (6.7%) adolescents in the general user group, 1860 (3.4%) in the potential-risk group, and 439 (0.8%) in the high-risk group experienced suicidal ideation in the last 12 months.
Adolescents who had engaged in suicide attempt within the last 12 months included 1121 (2.0%) of 54,978 participants. By category, 721 (1.3%) adolescents in the general group, 305 (0.6%) in the potential-risk group, and 95 (0.2%) in the high-risk group had attempted suicide in the last 12 months.
Table 3 shows the results of multivariate logistic regression analysis for the factors associated between smartphone addiction risk and suicidal ideation and suicide attempt. Adolescents who had potential risk of smartphone addiction exhibited higher likelihood of suicidal ideation (OR: 1.50, CI: 1.41–1.60) and those who had high-risk of smartphone use exhibited significant likelihood of suicidal ideation (OR: 2.49, CI: 2.21–2.81) compared to the adolescents who had general use of smartphones. Adolescents who had high-risk of smartphone use showed increasing risk of suicide attempt (OR: 1.87, CI: 1.48–2.37) compared to those who had general use of smartphones.
Table 4 shows the results of subgroup analysis stratified by independent variables. Adolescents who had potential risk of smartphone addiction exhibited higher likelihood of suicidal ideation. Further, adolescents who had high risk of smartphone addiction exhibited increased risk of suicidal ideation and attempt across all sociodemographic, socioeconomic, and health-related variables compared to the general smartphone use group.
Table 5 displays logistic regression analysis results of association between individual components of smartphone addiction risk and suicidal ideation and attempt; adolescents who scored higher on statements such as, “Due to the use of smartphones, I have experienced severe conflicts in friends, colleagues, and social relationships” and “Due to the smartphone, there are difficulties in performing tasks (such as study or work)” exhibited significant likelihood of both suicidal ideation (OR: 2.08–2.42) and attempt compared to the general users (OR: 1.87–2.45).

4. Discussion

In this study, we identified significant associations between adolescents’ smartphone addiction and suicidal ideation and suicide attempt among Korean adolescents. Adolescents who had potential and high risk of smartphone addiction showed increasing likelihood of both suicidal ideation and suicide attempt. Adolescents who strongly agreed with the smartphone addiction scale’s eighth (“I have a hard time with my family because of smartphone use”) and ninth (“Due to the use of smartphones, I have experienced severe conflicts in friends, colleagues, and social relationships”) items showed significantly higher likelihood for both suicidal ideation and attempt. Adolescents’ overdependence on smartphones can lead to social isolation and even a breaking down of their relationship with their closest ones, which can ultimately lead to loneliness and mental breakdown.
In our results, the potential-risk and high-risk smartphone user groups had significant risk for suicidal ideation and suicide attempt, which indicates that smartphone overuse can have a negative effect on adolescent’s mental health, as evidenced in previous studies [6,33]. One study found that Internet addiction had significantly higher relation to neuroticism and psychoticism, which appeared as significantly higher scores on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) subscales of emotional symptoms, conduct problems, and hyperactivity [34]. This may increase depression, anxiety, and mental health problems and cause a stronger link to suicidal ideation and suicide attempts.
Depressive symptoms and suicide are linked to time-related poor sleep, late-night use of digital devices, and smartphone addiction. Attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)-related behaviors include sleep problems and general screen time, which activates dopamine and reward pathways. Addictive screen time use is associated with reduced social distress and craving similar to subject affiliation behavior [35,36]. In addition, previous meta-analysis shows that Internet addiction was associated with increased suicidality after adjusting for potential confounding variables including depression [18].
In our results, high risk of smartphone addiction was associated with suicidal ideation and attempts (Table 4). A possible explanation is that the Internet provides and creates many activities that may be related to suicide problems. The results of this study suggest that online gaming, chatting, watching movies, shopping, and gambling are associated with suicide attempts. Online movies and chat rooms may discuss and share the suicide experience. Therefore, adolescents may learn about suicidal behaviors and learn about actual suicide methods [37,38,39].
Previous studies also state that adolescents who had poor relationships with their family and peers (social relationships) in their real life may establish relationships on the Internet or increase their smartphone use to escape such negative feelings. This may culminate in smartphone addiction [6,40,41,42,43]. Such an avoidance-based coping strategy can worsen the situation and make it hard to deal with life events and experiences, leading to no control of the stressful and depressing situation; adolescents may, therefore, experience mental breakdown, resulting in thoughts about suicide and even suicide attempts [44].
There are several limitations in this study. First, the data used in this study were cross-sectional and may be affected by reporting bias because they were collected through self-managed online surveys. This prevents us from inferring evidence of causality between the variables in this study. Second, our study was conducted in 2020. This was during the COVID-19 pandemic, and even though there was no lockdown in South Korea, public places such as restaurants, coffee shops, and movie theaters were restricted from operating or had restricted business hours. This may have affected the quality of life of young people in many ways.
Despite these limitations, this study had several strengths. First, we used the most recent and highest number of participants from a nationally representative database. Second, the data that we used were part of the smartphone addiction scale, which was constructed for the first time in 2021. Lastly, there were no published studies that directly examine smartphone addiction and both suicidal ideation and suicide attempt; our study bridged this gap.
In addition, future research may focus on other facts that lead adolescents to engage in smartphone overuse or suffer from addiction and can aim to understand the longitudinal impact of specific application of smartphone use on the overdependence behaviors of adolescents, which can prevent related mental health issues and help strengthen the current smartphone-use-related policies and guidelines.

5. Conclusions

Our study shows significant correlation between smartphone addiction risk level and suicidal ideation and suicide attempt among Korean adolescents. The study results suggest that it is important to encourage parents and social workers to acknowledge smartphone overuse or addiction as it has significant risks to adolescents’ mental health. Therefore, there is a persistent need for effective prevention plans and specific government policies that can reduce smartphone overuse and the suicide rate. First, smartphone-based tools can provide an effective way to prevent smartphone addiction and further risks, which is corroborated by certain studies that revealed that smartphone-based tools have reduced depressive symptoms and anxiety. Second, based on our results, we suggest that parental monitoring, emotional support, and moderate restriction of smartphone use are a few actions that can be taken by parents to prevent the risks arising from smartphone addiction.

Author Contributions

O.S. contributed to designing the study, conducting the statistical analysis, and writing and editing the first draft of the manuscript. Y.H.J. and Y.S.P. contributed to the study design and statistical analysis. E.-C.P. contributed to checking the statistical analysis and reviewing the manuscript. S.-Y.J. contributed to checking the statistical analysis and editing the final manuscript and approving the final version of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and has been approved for exemption from deliberation by the Institutional Review Board of Yonsei University Health System, Severance Hospital in Korea and the approval number was 4-2021-1050.

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was waived because the data was obtained from a public anonymized secondary database.

Data Availability Statement

Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: (https://kdca.go.kr/yhs, accessed on 26 September 2021).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Global Accelerated Action for the Health of Adolescents (AA-HA!): Guidance to Support Country Implementation; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  2. Roh, B.-R.; Jung, E.H.; Hong, H.J. A comparative study of suicide rates among 10–19-year-olds in 29 OECD countries. Psychiatry Investig. 2018, 15, 376–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. OECD. Health at a Glance 2011: OECD Indicators; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yang, K.-M. The effect of self-esteem and depression on smartphone addiction among university students. J. Korea Converg. Soc. 2016, 7, 113–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, P.; Zhao, M.; Wang, X.; Xie, X.; Wang, Y.; Lei, L. Peer relationship and adolescent smartphone addiction: The mediating role of self-esteem and the moderating role of the need to belong. J. Behav. Addict. 2017, 6, 708–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Matar Boumosleh, J.; Jaalouk, D. Depression, anxiety, and smartphone addiction in university students—A cross sectional study. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0182239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kuem, J.; Ray, S.; Hsu, P.-F.; Khansa, L. Smartphone addiction and conflict: An Incentive-sensitisation perspective of addiction for information systems. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 2020, 30, 403–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Canale, N.; Vieno, A.; Doro, M.; Mineo, E.R.; Marino, C.; Billieux, J. Emotion-related impulsivity moderates the cognitive interference effect of smartphone availability on working memory. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 18519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tateno, M.; Teo, A.; Ukai, W.; Kanazawa, J.; Katsuki, R.; Kubo, H.; Kato, T.A. Internet addiction, smartphone addiction, and hikikomori trait in Japanese young adult: Social isolation and social network. Front. Psychiatry 2019, 10, 455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Young, K.S. Internet addiction: A new clinical phenomenon and its consequences. Am. Behav. Sci. 2004, 48, 402–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Widyanto, L.; Griffiths, M. ‘Internet addiction’: A critical review. Int. J. Ment. Health Addict. 2006, 4, 31–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jiang, Q.; Huang, X.; Tao, R. Examining factors influencing internet addiction and adolescent risk behaviors among excessive internet users. Health Commun. 2018, 33, 1434–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Reyna, V.F.; Farley, F. Risk and rationality in adolescent decision making: Implications for theory, practice, and public policy. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 2006, 7, 1–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Neumann, A.; Van Lier, P.A.C.; Gratz, K.; Koot, H.M. Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation difficulties in adolescents using the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Assessment 2010, 17, 138–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Finkenauer, C.; Engels, R.; Baumeister, R. Parenting behaviour and adolescent behavioural and emotional problems: The role of self-control. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 2005, 29, 58–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Schore, A.N. The experience-dependent maturation of a regulatory system in the orbital prefrontal cortex and the origin of developmental psychopathology. Dev. Psychopathol. 1996, 8, 59–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Longstreet, P.; Brooks, S.; Gonzalez, E.S. Internet addiction: When the positive emotions are not so positive. Technol. Soc. 2019, 57, 76–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cheng, Y.-S.; Tseng, P.-T.; Lin, P.-Y.; Chen, T.-Y.; Stubbs, B.; Carvalho, A.F.; Wu, C.K.; Chen, Y.W.; Wu, M.K. Internet addiction and its relationship with suicidal behaviors: A meta-analysis of multinational observational studies. J. Clin. Psychiatry 2018, 79, 9291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Samaha, M.; Hawi, N.S. Relationships among smartphone addiction, stress, academic performance, and satisfaction with life. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016, 57, 321–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rachmaniar, R.; Prihandini, P.; Janitra, P.A. Perilaku penggunaan smartphone dan akses pornografi di kalangan remaja perempuan. J. Komun. Glob. 2018, 7, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Alim-Marvasti, A.; Bi, W.; Mahroo, O.A.; Barbur, J.L.; Plant, G.T. Transient smartphone “blindness”. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 374, 2502–2504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Machulska, A.; Kleinke, K.; Eiler, T.J.; Grünewald, A.; Brück, R.; Jahn, K.; Niehaves, B.; Gethmann, C.F.; Klucken, T. Retraining automatic action tendencies for smoking using mobile phone-based approach-avoidance bias training: A study protocol for a randomized controlled study. Trials 2019, 20, 720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mancinelli, E.; Ruocco, E.; Napolitano, S.; Salcuni, S. A network analysis on self-harming and smartphone addiction–The role of self-control, internalizing and externalizing problems in a sample of self-harming adolescents. Compr. Psychiatry 2022, 112, 152285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Arrivillaga, C.; Rey, L.; Extremera, N. Adolescents’ problematic internet and smartphone use is related to suicide ideation: Does emotional intelligence make a difference? Comput. Hum. Behav. 2020, 110, 106375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kim, M.-H.; Min, S.; Ahn, J.-S.; An, C.; Lee, J. Association between high adolescent smartphone use and academic impairment, conflicts with family members or friends, and suicide attempts. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0219831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lee, J.; Ahn, J.-S.; Min, S.; Kim, M.-H. Psychological characteristics and addiction propensity according to content type of smartphone use. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Mancinelli, E.; Sharka, O.; Lai, T.; Sgaravatti, E.; Salcuni, S. Self-injury and smartphone addiction: Age and gender differences in a community sample of adolescents presenting self-injurious behavior. Health Psychol. Open 2021, 8, 20551029211038811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Bukhori, B.; Said, H.; Wijaya, T.; Nor, F.M. The effect of smartphone addiction, achievement motivation, and textbook reading intensity on students’ academic achievement. Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol. 2019, 13, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Genctanirim Kurt, D. Suicide risk in college students: The effects of Internet addiction and drug use. Educ. Sci. Theory Pract. 2015, 15, 841–848. [Google Scholar]
  30. Ko, C.-H.; Yen, J.-Y.; Yen, C.-F.; Chen, C.-S.; Wang, S.-Y. The Association between internet addiction and belief of frustration intolerance: The gender difference. CyberPsychol. Behav. 2008, 11, 273–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lee, S.-Y.; Lee, D.; Nam, C.R.; Kim, D.Y.; Park, S.; Kwon, J.-G.; Kweon, Y.-S.; Lee, Y.; Kim, D.J.; Choi, J.-S. Distinct patterns of Internet and smartphone-related problems among adolescents by gender: Latent class analysis. J. Behav. Addict. 2018, 7, 454–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Science Mo, ICT. Smartphone Overdependency Survey 2019; Ministry of Science and ICT: Sejong, Korea, 2020.
  33. Choi, H.-S.; Lee, H.-K.; Ha, J.-C. The influence of smartphone addiction on mental health, campus life and personal relations-Focusing on K university students. J. Korean Data Inf. Sci. Soc. 2012, 23, 1005–1015. [Google Scholar]
  34. Cao, F.; Su, L. Internet addiction among Chinese adolescents: Prevalence and psychological features. Child Care Health Dev. 2007, 33, 275–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yen, J.-Y.; Ko, C.-H.; Yen, C.-F.; Wu, H.-Y.; Yang, M.-J. The comorbid psychiatric symptoms of internet addiction: Attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), depression, social phobia, and hostility. J. Adolesc. Health 2007, 41, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lissak, G. Adverse physiological and psychological effects of screen time on children and adolescents: Literature review and case study. Environ. Res. 2018, 164, 149–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Luxton, D.D.; June, J.D.; Fairall, J.M. Social media and suicide: A public health perspective. Am. J. Public Health 2012, 102, S195–S200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tsouvelas, G.O. Giotakos. Internet use and pathological internet engagement in a sample of college students. Psychiatriki 2021, 22, 221–230. [Google Scholar]
  39. Lin, I.-H.; Ko, C.-H.; Chang, Y.-P.; Liu, T.-L.; Wang, P.-W.; Lin, H.-C.; Huang, M.-F.; Yeh, Y.-C.; Chou, W.-J.; Yen, C.-F. The association between suicidality and Internet addiction and activities in Taiwanese adolescents. Compr. Psychiatry 2014, 55, 504–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kim, N.-Y. A Study on Impact of Smartphone Addiction on the Mental Health-Focused on Moderating Effect of Parent-Child Relationship. J. Korea Soc. Comput. Inf. 2017, 22, 89–95. [Google Scholar]
  41. Hawi, N.S.; Samaha, M. Relationships among smartphone addiction, anxiety, and family relations. Behav. Inf. Technol. 2017, 36, 1046–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bong, E.-J.; Kim, Y.-K. Relationship between life stress, depression and smartphone addiction in nursing students: Mediating effects of experiential avoidance. J. Korea Acad.-Ind. Coop. Soc. 2017, 18, 121–129. [Google Scholar]
  43. Kim, E.; Cho, I.; Kim, E.J. Structural equation model of smartphone addiction based on adult attachment theory: Mediating effects of loneliness and depression. Asian Nurs. Res. 2017, 11, 92–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lee, H. The Mediating Effects of Multidimensional Experiential Avoidance on the Relationship between Stress and Internet/Smartphone Addiction in Adolescents. Korean J. Stress Res. 2017, 25, 279–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Table 1. General characteristics of the categorized smartphone use group.
Table 1. General characteristics of the categorized smartphone use group.
VariablesTotalGeneral User GroupPotential-Risk User GroupHigh-Risk User Group
N%N%N%N%p-Value
Total54,948100.041,17374.912,14222.116333.0
Sex <0.0001
Male28,35351.622,52154.7523943.159336.3
Female26,59548.418,65245.3690356.9104063.7
Grade <0.0001
High school28,96152.722,09653.7606750.079848.9
Middle school25,98747.319,07746.3607550.083551.1
Academic achievement <0.0001
High18,21733.212,63430.7477839.480549.3
Moderate16,58530.212,67930.8353129.137523.0
Low20,14636.715,86038.5383331.645327.7
Household income <0.0001
High721213.1504712.3185915.330618.7
Average26,39748.019,65047.7598549.376246.7
Low21,33938.816,47640.0429835.456534.6
Residential type <0.0001
Lives with parents52,33295.239,12695.011,65196.0155595.2
Lives without parents26164.820475.04914.0784.8
Sleep satisfaction <0.0001
Satisfied16,82430.613,75933.4275022.631519.3
Moderate18,65634.014,16534.4408133.641025.1
Unsatisfied19,46835.413,24932.2531143.790855.6
Fast food <0.0001
≤2 times/week41,29275.131,90377.5839669.199360.8
≥3 times/week13,65624.9927022.5374630.964039.2
Physical activity <0.0001
≤2 days a week37,24167.826,85865.2912075.1126377.3
≥3 days a week17,70732.214,31534.8302224.937022.7
Lifetime smoking experience <0.0001
Never48,86788.937,06290.010,52786.7127878.3
Ever608111.1411110.0161513.335521.7
Alcohol consumption <0.0001
Never49,05689.337,18190.310,55887.0131780.6
Ever589210.739929.7158413.031619.4
Table 2. Bivariate association between smartphone addiction and suicide ideation and suicide attempt of study population.
Table 2. Bivariate association between smartphone addiction and suicide ideation and suicide attempt of study population.
Variables TotalSuicide IdeationSuicide Attempt
Yesp-ValueYesp-Value
N%N%N%
Total54,948100.0597910.9 11212.0
Smartphone addiction <0.0001 <0.0001
General user group41,17374.936806.7 7211.3
Potential-risk user group12,14222.118603.4 3050.6
High-risk user group16333.04390.8 950.2
Sex <0.0001 <0.0001
Male28,35351.622544.1 3820.7
Female26,59548.437256.8 7391.3
Grade <0.0001 <0.9439
High school28,96152.730135.5 5921.1
Middle school25,98747.329665.4 5291.0
Academic achievement <0.0001 <0.0001
High18,21733.224864.5 5311.0
Moderate16,58530.215512.8 2710.5
Low20,14636.719423.5 3190.6
Household income <0.0001 <0.0001
High721213.113322.4 2920.5
Average26,39748.026394.8 4470.8
Low21,33938.820083.7 3820.7
Residential type <0.0001 <0.0001
Lives with parents52,33295.2559410.2 10111.8
Lives without parents26164.83850.7 1100.2
Sleep satisfaction <0.0001 <0.0001
Satisfied16,82430.69741.8 1880.3
Moderate18,65634.017883.3 3020.5
Unsatisfied19,46835.432175.9 6311.1
Fast food <0.0001 <0.0024
≤2 times/week 41,29275.142687.8 7991.5
≥3 times/week13,65624.917113.1 3220.6
Physical activity <0.0066 <0.0403
≤2 days a week37,24167.841457.5 7281.3
≥3 days a week17,70732.218343.3 3930.7
Lifetime smoking experience <0.0001 <0.0001
Never48,86788.947738.7 7691.4
Ever608111.112062.2 3520.6
Alcohol consumption <0.001 <0.001
Never49,05689.348098.8 7961.4
Ever589210.711702.1 3250.6
Table 3. Results of multivariate logistic regression analysis for the factors associated between Smartphone addiction risk and suicidal ideation and suicide attempt.
Table 3. Results of multivariate logistic regression analysis for the factors associated between Smartphone addiction risk and suicidal ideation and suicide attempt.
VariablesSuicide IdeationSuicide Attempt
OR95% CIOR95% CI
Smartphone addiction
General user group1.00 1.00
Potential-risk user group1.501.41–1.601.100.96–1.27
High-risk user group2.492.21–2.811.871.48–2.37
Sex
Male
Female1.881.77–1.992.422.12–2.77
Grade
High school1.00 1.00
Middle school1.211.15–1.291.601.41–1.82
Academic achievement
High1.00 1.00
Moderate0.930.87–1.001.050.89–1.24
Low1.161.08–1.241.421.22–1.65
Household income
High1.00 1.00
Average1.000.94–1.060.880.76–1.01
Low1.781.65–1.931.711.45–2.02
Residential type
Lives with parents1.00 1.00
Lives without parents1.361.21–1.532.131.72–2.63
Sleep satisfaction
Satisfied1.00 1.00
Moderate1.541.42–1.681.241.03–1.50
Unsatisfied2.522.34–2.732.141.81–2.54
Fast food
≤2 times/week 1.00 1.00
≥3 times/week1.091.02–1.161.020.89–1.17
Physical activity
≤2 days a week1.00 1.00
≥3 days a week0.910.85–0.970.770.67–0.87
Lifetime smoking experience
Never1.00 1.00
Ever1.831.69–1.992.862.45–3.35
Alcohol consumption
Never
Ever1.621.49–1.762.111.80–2.47
Table 4. The results of subgroup analysis stratified by are independent variables.
Table 4. The results of subgroup analysis stratified by are independent variables.
VariablesSuicide IdeationSuicide Attempt
General User GroupPotential-Risk User GroupHigh-Risk User GroupGeneral User GroupPotential-Risk User GroupHigh-Risk User Group
OROR95% CIOR95% CIOROR95% CI95% CI
Sex
Male1.001.491.35–1.652.752.23–3.391.000.960.74–1.251.68–3.82
Female1.001.491.38–1.622.352.03–2.731.001.150.97–1.361.22–2.15
Academic achievement
High1.001.431.30–1.582.261.91–2.681.001.080.88–1.321.28–2.38
Moderate1.001.571.39–1.773.032.36–3.901.001.090.82–1.451.32–3.70
Low1.001.511.35–1.692.481.96–3.141.001.130.86–1.481.17–3.10
Residential type
Lives with parents1.001.511.42–1.612.482.19–2.811.001.110.96–1.281.34–2.22
Lives without parents1.001.310.99–1.732.621.56–4.401.001.100.66–1.841.68–6.89
Table 5. Association between smartphone addiction and suicide ideation and attempt according to individual component of independent variable.
Table 5. Association between smartphone addiction and suicide ideation and attempt according to individual component of independent variable.
VariablesSuicide IdeationSuicide Attempt
NoYesNoYes
OROR95% CIOROR95% CI
Smartphone over dependence statement
It fails every time you reduce the smartphone hours1.001.261.19–1.331.000.950.83–1.07
It is difficult to control the usage time of smartphone1.001.251.18–1.321.000.880.78–1.00
It is difficult to keep proper smartphone usage time1.001.281.21–1.361.000.940.83–1.06
It is hard to focus on other things if you have a smartphone next to you1.001.391.32–1.471.001.010.89–1.14
Thinking of smartphone does not leave your head1.001.701.58–1.831.001.401.20–1.63
I strongly desire to use smartphone1.001.661.56–1.771.001.311.14–1.50
I have problems with my health because of smartphone use1.001.571.46–1.691.001.651.42–1.90
I have a hard time with my family because of smartphone use1.002.081.96–2.211.001.871.65–2.13
Due to the use of smartphones, I have experienced severe conflicts in friends, colleagues, and social relationships1.002.422.18–2.691.002.452.03–2.95
Due to the smartphone, there are difficulties in performing tasks (such as study or work)1.001.621.53–1.731.001.351.18–1.55
The results were adjusted for other covariates. odds ratio (OR); 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shinetsetseg, O.; Jung, Y.H.; Park, Y.S.; Park, E.-C.; Jang, S.-Y. Association between Smartphone Addiction and Suicide. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 11600. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811600

AMA Style

Shinetsetseg O, Jung YH, Park YS, Park E-C, Jang S-Y. Association between Smartphone Addiction and Suicide. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(18):11600. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811600

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shinetsetseg, Oyuntuya, Yun Hwa Jung, Yu Shin Park, Eun-Cheol Park, and Suk-Yong Jang. 2022. "Association between Smartphone Addiction and Suicide" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 18: 11600. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811600

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop