Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Working from Home on Mental Health: A Cross-Sectional Study of Canadian Worker’s Mental Health during the Third Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic
Next Article in Special Issue
The Spatial Effect of Air Pollution Governance on Labor Productivity: Evidence from 262 Chinese Cities
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Cadherin 12 (CDH12) in the Peritoneal Fluid among Patients with Endometriosis and Endometriosis-Related Infertility
Previous Article in Special Issue
Indoor Air Quality in Tujia Dwellings in Hunan, China: Field Tests, Numerical Simulations, and Mitigation Strategies
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 19
Issue 18
10.3390/ijerph191811585
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Long-Term Effects of Ambient Particulate and Gaseous Pollutants on Serum High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein Levels: A Cross-Sectional Study Using KoGES-HEXA Data

by
Ji Hyun Kim
,
Hae Dong Woo
,
Sunho Choi
,
Dae Sub Song
,
Jung Hyun Lee
and
Kyoungho Lee
*
Division of Population Health Research, Department of Precision Medicine, Korea National Institute of Health, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, 200 Osongsaengmyeong 2-ro, Osong-eup, Heungdeok-gu, Cheongju-si 28160, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(18), 11585; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811585
Submission received: 12 July 2022 / Revised: 6 September 2022 / Accepted: 7 September 2022 / Published: 14 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Frontiers in Air Pollution and Human Health)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Ambient air pollutants reportedly increase inflammatory responses associated with multiple chronic diseases. We investigated the effects of long-term exposure to ambient air pollution on high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) using data from 60,581 participants enrolled in the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study-Health Examinees Study between 2012 and 2017. Community Multiscale Air Quality System with surface data assimilation was used to estimate the participants’ exposure to criteria air pollutants based on geocoded residential addresses. Long-term exposure was defined as the 2-year moving average concentrations of PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NO2, and O3. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were utilized to estimate the percent changes in hs-CRP and odds ratios of systemic low-grade inflammation (hs-CRP > 3 mg/L) per interquartile range increment in air pollutants. We identified positive associations between hs-CRP and PM10 (% changes: 3.75 [95% CI 2.68, 4.82]), PM2.5 (3.68, [2.57, 4.81]), SO2 (1.79, [1.10, 2.48]), and NO2 (3.31, [2.12, 4.52]), while negative association was demonstrated for O3 (−3.81, [−4.96, −2.65]). Elevated risks of low-grade inflammation were associated with PM10 (odds ratio: 1.07 [95% CI 1.01, 1.13]), PM2.5 (1.08 [1.02, 1.14]), and SO2 (1.05 [1.01, 1.08]). The odds ratios reported indicated that the exposures might be risk factors for inflammatory conditions; however, they did not reflect strong associations. Our findings suggest that exposure to air pollutants may play a role in the inflammation process.

1. Introduction

Air pollution is a complex mixture of particulate and gaseous materials that vary depending on their source and physicochemical composition [1,2]. Ambient air pollution has become a major public health burden worldwide, contributing to increased morbidity and premature death, and loss of disability-adjusted life-years [3,4]. Air pollutants have detrimental effects on human health, resulting in multiple chronic diseases including respiratory, cardiovascular, ischemic stroke, and other neuro-metabolic dysfunctions [5,6,7,8]. The underlying mechanisms inducing adverse health outcomes by inhaled air pollutants have not been clearly elucidated, but it is hypothesized that pollutants may activate cellular signaling networks, leading to systemic inflammatory responses [9,10].
Inflammasomes activated by air pollutants induce increased secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor α [TNF-α]), and further mediate the hepatic production of acute-phase proteins, including C-reactive protein (CRP) and fibrinogen [11,12]. Among the acute-phase reactants, CRP is a robust marker of low-grade inflammation and is one of the most intensively studied biomarkers associated with cardiovascular health [13,14]. The assessment of high-sensitivity CRP (hs-CRP) is more precise than the conventional measurements, and improved sensitivity makes hs-CRP suitable for detecting low-grade inflammation and the risk of cardiometabolic disorders in the general population [15,16].
Many studies have reported the short-term exposure effects of air pollutants on CRP [17,18]. Increased systemic levels of CRP have been reported after a delay of two days following pollutant exposure because the liver requires time to process acute-phase proteins [19,20]. A recent meta-analysis comprising 40 observational studies with 244,681 participants reported on the association of particulate matters (PMs; particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter < 10 µm [PM10] and <2.5 µm [PM2.5]) and circulating CRP level. In this study, long-term exposure to particulate air pollution was reported to have a stronger effect as compared to short-term exposure on CRP levels. This indicates substantial cumulative effects of tissue damage and inflammation over longer durations [17]. Moreover, a meta-analysis that included 27 studies on the associations between gaseous pollutants (sulfur dioxide [SO2], nitrogen dioxide [NO2], and ozone [O3]) and CRP levels have yielded inconclusive results and reported that there was a limited number of studies, especially with regards to long-term exposure [18].
In the context of inflammatory markers, PMs have been frequently investigated [14], while prior studies on gaseous materials are limited, and further studies are required [18]. Aggregated long-term concentrations of gaseous pollutants based on daily concentrations of NO2, SO2, and O3 have been suggested as suitable indicators of air pollution, as they often share the same sources, and their levels tend to be highly correlated over time [21]. Various sources of air pollutant measures have become accessible, and the air quality prediction model enabled spatially detailed exposure in domestic areas, including places where the monitoring sites are sparse [22,23]. Moreover, a previous study in a single capital city in Korea assessed the inflammatory effect of a series of air pollutants and suggested that further studies are required to generalize the results obtained to other domestic regions [24].
Accordingly, the current study aimed to fill these gaps by examining the associations between long-term exposure to air pollutants, including PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NO2, and O3, with the circulating concentrations of hs-CRP in participants from domestic regions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population

This cross-sectional study was based on the data from the first phase of the follow-up examination (2012–2017) of the Health Examinee (HEXA), a nationwide population-based cohort among the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (KoGES).
The study design has been described in detail previously [25]. Briefly, the inclusion criteria were: participants enrolled in KoGES-HEXA; aged over 40 years at baseline; and who visited the health examination centers and hospitals located in metropolitan areas and major cities. Participants underwent a series of anthropometric measurements and clinical examinations. A self-administered questionnaire including socio-demographic information, lifestyle factors, and medical history of diseases was also obtained.
Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to the examinations, and the study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the National Institute of Health, Korea (2019-05-04-2C-A; 2022-04-04-P-A).

2.2. Participant Selection

In the first phase of follow-up between 2012 and 2017, 65,616 participants residing in 16 administrative divisions of South Korea (seven metropolitan cities and nine provinces) were enrolled. Those with incomplete information on residential address, or participants residing in Jeju, the province that differs from other administrative divisions environmentally [26], and participants without linkage with air pollutants data were excluded from the study (2601 observations). We also excluded participants with missing values of hs-CRP and levels higher than 10 mg/L indicating potential acute infections [13] (768 observations). We further excluded participants with missing values in any of the covariates including blood lipid profiles and fasting glucose, blood pressure, body mass index, health-related behaviors, socio-demographic factors, and self-reported physician-diagnosed diseases (1666 observations). The final sample of the study comprised 60,581 participants (Figure 1).

2.3. Ambient Air Pollution and Meteorological Factors

  • Geographic estimation of air pollution and meteorological factors
To estimate the ambient air pollutants and meteorological parameters, first, the concentrations of criteria air pollutants (PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NO2, and O3) were calculated in a spatial resolution of 9 km using the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model based on the meteorological and emission models. The meteorological values were generated using the Weather Research and Forecasting model (WRF) and used as the input for the emission and chemical transport models and as final meteorological variables for the analysis. The detailed configurations for the meteorological, emission and CMAQ models in this study are presented in Table S1. Second, surface data assimilation, a method of combining the estimated values with the observed values was applied by assigning a weight to each observation within the radius of influence. The ambient air quality monitoring stations in China and Korea were used in the model. Pun’s interpolation was used for assimilation to produce realistic gradients with sparse air quality data. Third, the spatial resolution of PM10 and PM2.5 were improved from 9 km to 1 km grid unit by using the aerosol optical depth (AOD) observations from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Terra and Aqua satellites. Fourth, PM10, PM2.5, and O3 were adjusted for normalized difference vegetation index and meteorological data using the multiple linear regression method. Additionally, to improve the probable overestimation of PM2.5 concentrations during the periods when the air quality monitoring data for PM2.5 were unavailable (before 2015), the ratio of PM2.5 to PM10 for dust storm days and several districts of Seoul with PM2.5 monitoring data were further extrapolated to all of the regions.
The final daily average levels of meteorological data (e.g., temperature [°C] and humidity [%]) and gaseous pollutants (SO2, NO2, and O3) were presented in every 9 km-grid; and PMs are provided as 1 km-grid unit. All the air pollution and meteorological data were generated as a geocode. The modeling grid points where the air quality monitoring stations are located were extracted; and the performances of modeled concentrations of criteria air pollutants were tested against the measured data from the monitoring stations in Korea. The results of the model performance evaluation for 2010–2017 are provided in Table S2. The average R2 for PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NO2, and O3 were 0.76, 0.66, 0.42, 0.74, and 0.66, respectively. A more detailed methodology and descriptions for the models have been described in the previous studies [22,27].
  • Geocoding of the study participants
Participants’ residential addresses were converted into latitude and longitude using a geocoding software, GeoService-Xr (GeoService, Seoul, Korea). If the address for the first phase of follow-up was missing, the address from the baseline survey was used as a substitute. When the detailed address was unavailable or out of date, the address was replaced with the nearby public administrative institution.
  • Merging the estimated air pollution and meteorological data with the participants
The geocoded addresses of participants were matched to air pollutant and meteorological data with corresponding grid units using the ArcGIS program (ESRI, Inc., Redland, CA, USA). To estimate the individual exposure of each participant, the data from the KoGES and air pollution and meteorological factor database were combined based on the participants’ date of examination and their geocoded units of residential address.
Long-term exposures to ambient air pollutants were defined as the 2-year moving average (lag 0 to 729 days) and short-term exposures were defined as the 3-day moving average (lag 0 to 2 days). To minimize the exposure misclassification errors due to the residential relocation of study participants between baseline data collection and follow-up, we considered the residential mobility during the first visit and follow-up, by using time-weighted average concentrations [28,29]. We assumed that the participants change their place of residence at the midpoint between baseline and the follow-up examination. For instance, if a person had reported residing in “place A” at the baseline exam (1 January 2007) and “place B” at the first follow-up exam (31 December 2008), then the air pollutant exposure in the first half period (from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2007) was calculated based on place A, and second half period (from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2008) was based on place B.

2.4. Inflammatory Marker

Venous blood samples were drawn after a minimum of 8 h overnight fasting for biochemical analysis, and samples were immediately separated by centrifugation and then sent to a central laboratory authenticated via external quality assessment. The serum hs-CRP levels were quantified by turbidimetric immunoassay method using an automated analyzer (Roche/Hitachi Modular P800; Roche Diagnostics, Tokyo, Japan), with a detection threshold of 0.01 mg/L. Hs-CRP was dichotomized at the level of 3 mg/L, a cutoff point commonly used as a clinical indicator for systemic low-dose inflammation and high-risk cardiovascular disease as well [13].

2.5. Covariates

The individual-level covariates were selected a priori and included in the main model following a variance inflation factor (VIF) test with a cut-off value of <5.0 to avoid multi-collinearity. The continuous covariates included were age (years), body mass index (BMI, kg/m2), and 2-day moving average of meteorological factors (temperature [°C] and relative humidity [%]) and the categorical covariates included were sex, visit year, season, weekday of examination, place of residence (metropolitan and non-metropolitan) [30], smoking status (non, ex, and current), drinking status (non, ex, and current), regular exercise (yes and no to whether the study participants regularly exercise to make their bodies sweat at least once a week), occupation (professional, administrative; office, sales, and service; laborer, agricultural; and others, unemployed), education (less than middle school [9 years], middle-high school [9–12 years], and college or more [>12 years]), marital status (married/cohabiting; and single/divorced/widowed/separation, or others), medical history of diabetes (defined as self-reported physician-diagnosed diabetes, or fasting blood glucose ≥ 126 mg/dL), hypertension (defined as self-reported physician-diagnosed hypertension, or systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg, or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg), dyslipidemia (defined as self-reported physician-diagnosed dyslipidemia, or triglyceride ≥ 200 mg/dL, or total cholesterol ≥ 240 mg/dL, or low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol ≥ 160 mg/dL, or high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol < 40 mg/dL) [31], cardio- and cerebrovascular disease (defined as self-reported physician diagnosis of ischemic heart disease or cerebral stroke), and cancer (defined as self-reported physician diagnosis of any types of cancers).

2.6. Statistical Analyses

For multivariable linear models, hs-CRP was loge-transformed before the analysis to better approximate normality. We assessed the association of long-term exposure to ambient air pollutants with the level of loge-transformed hs-CRP. The pollutant effects were expressed as (exp(β) − 1) ∗ 100, where β was the estimated regression coefficient, and the results of the analyses were presented as a percentage difference of hs-CRP per interquartile range (IQR) increase in air pollutants. For multivariable logistic regression models, we examined the probability of hs-CRP > 3 mg/L [13].
Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of our findings. We evaluated three models, each with incrementally more covariates: model 1 included age, sex, time, and meteorological factors; model 2 included the covariates in model 1 as well as for lifestyle factors; and model 3 (main model) included the covariates in model 2 as well as for the medical history of diseases. We conducted subgroup analyses by age (<65 or ≥65 years), sex (male or female), BMI (<25 or ≥25 kg/m2; obese was defined as a BMI of 25 kg/m2 or higher based on the Asian-Pacific criteria [32]), smoking status (non-, ex-, or current smokers), regular exercise (yes or no), and self-reported medical history of diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and cardio- and cerebrovascular disease (yes or no) for multivariable-adjusted linear and logistic regression models, and subgroup analysis by drinking status (non-, ex-, or current drinkers) was also carried out for logistic models. The effect modification was evaluated by including multiplicative terms between each pollutant and potential effect modifier in the adjusted models. We also examined the association after adjusting for short-term exposure, defined as the 3-day average of each pollutant, with and without interaction terms between long- and short-term exposure of each pollutant, to further consider whether the chronic effect was attenuated by the acute effect [24]; and investigated the remaining predictive effects of pollutants by incorporating two-pollutant models [33], with the restriction of Spearman inter-correlation between pollutants below 0.70 [14]. Furthermore, to examine whether there is a potential misclassification in exposure, we conducted a subgroup analysis by only including participants who did not change their residential address between the baseline and the first phase of follow-up.
All statistical analyses were performed using SAS software version 9.4, Cary, NC, USA. Two-tailed p-values < 0.05 were considered significant except for the correlation analyses with a more conservative level of significance (p < 0.001), and for interaction terms where we accepted p < 0.10.

3. Results

3.1. Study Population

The characteristics of the participants are presented in Table 1. The mean age of the participants was 58.7 ± 8.1 years, and 66.5% of them were women. Most of the participants resided in metropolitan areas (62.5%), were non- or ex-smokers (92.3%), were non- or ex-drinkers (58.9%), were non-obese (67.7%), and exercised regularly (58.8%). Most of the participants had no history of diabetes (86.5%), cardio- and cerebrovascular disease (94.4%), cancer (94.0%), or lung diseases (asthma [97.8%]; and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [99.8%]). When comparing the two groups according to the low-grade inflammation status, a higher proportion of participants with inflammation (hs-CRP > 3 mg/L) were above 65 years of age, men, obese, those who exercised less regularly, those with a history of diseases, and those dwelling in a non-metropolitan area as compared to participants with normal hs-CRP levels (hs-CRP ≤ 3 mg/L). Additionally, a lower proportion of participants with inflammation were non-smokers and non-drinkers as compared to participants with normal hs-CRP levels. The groups also differed in occupation distribution, education attainment, and season of enrollment.

3.2. Air Pollutants

The summary statistics of environmental factors including 2-year average exposure measures of air pollutants and a 2-day average of meteorological factors are summarized in Table 2 and Figure S1. The participants’ average exposure to PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NO2, and O3 were 48.34 μg/m3, 25.20 μg/m3, 5.40 ppb, 23.46 ppb, and 25.86 ppb, respectively. The exposures in all participants exceeded the annual World Health Organization (WHO) air quality guideline (AQG) levels for PMs, which has been updated in 2021 (PM10 < 15 μg/m3; and PM2.5 < 5 μg/m3) [34]. As per the Korean AQG for annual average limits (PM10 < 50 μg/m3; and PM2.5 < 15 μg/m3) [35], 20,328 (33.56%) and 60,567 (99.98%) participants exceeded the limits of PM10 and PM2.5, respectively. With regards to annual WHO AQG levels for NO2 (<10 μg/m3) [34], 36,397 (60.08%) participants exceeded the limit. As per the Korean AQG for annual average limits (SO2 < 20 ppb; and NO2 < 30 ppb), 7 (0.01%) and 15,435 (25.48%) participants exceeded SO2 and NO2 levels, respectively [35]. No annual guidelines or limits have been established for O3.
The strongest correlation was observed between NO2 and O3 (rs = −0.78), followed by PM10 and O3 (rs = −0.66), NO2 and SO2 (rs = 0.62), PM10 and PM2.5 (rs = 0.59), and NO2 and PM10 (rs = 0.50). Temperature exhibited no significant correlation with PMs.

3.3. Effects of Long-Term Exposure to Air Pollutants on Inflammatory Markers

The results of the associations of long-term residential exposure to ambient air pollutants with hs-CRP level are presented in Figure 2. Significant concentration-response associations were observed in all pollutants. This was evident as participants with higher-quartile exposure generally had higher levels of hs-CRP in PM10, PM2.5, SO2, and NO2, while a negative trend in the association was observed in O3 (all p < 0.001). Each IQR increase in 2-year average concentrations of air pollutants was significantly associated with percent changes in hs-CRP levels after controlling for potential confounders (PM10: 3.75%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.68, 4.82; PM2.5: 3.68%, 95% CI 2.57, 4.81; SO2: 1.79%, 95% CI 1.10, 2.48; NO2: 3.31%, 95% CI 2.12, 4.52; and O3: −3.81%, 95% CI −4.96, −2.65).
Figure 3 shows the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% Cis for the association between long-term exposure to ambient air pollutants with low-grade inflammation (level of hs-CRP > 3 mg/L). Positive trends in the associations were observed between 2-year average concentrations of PM10, PM2.5, and SO2 with hs-CRP levels, indicated by an increment in the magnitude of point estimates (all p < 0.05). Each IQR increase in 2-year average concentrations of PMs and SO2 was significantly associated with elevated risks of low-grade inflammation in the fully adjusted model (PM10: 1.07, 95% CI 1.01, 1.13; PM2.5: 1.08, 95% CI 1.02, 1.14; and SO2: 1.05, 95% CI 1.01, 1.08).

3.4. Sensitivity Analyses

When we evaluated the models, each with incrementally more covariates, the direction, strength, and significance of associations were maintained from the minimally adjusted model (model 1) to the fully adjusted model (model 3; main model) (Table S3).
The effect modifications on the association between each air pollutant and hs-CRP are presented in Table S4 for linear regression models and Table S5 for logistic regression models. In our linear models, statistically significant effect modifications were observed with age (PM2.5), sex (PM10, NO2, and O3), BMI (PM10, PM2.5, and SO2), smoking status (SO2 and NO2), regular exercise (SO2 and NO2), and medical histories of hypertension (PM10 and PM2.5), dyslipidemia (PM10), and cardio- and cerebrovascular disease (SO2 and NO2) (all p-values < 0.10). In the logistic regression, similar effect modifying patterns were observed for smoking status (SO2 and NO2), regular exercise (SO2), and histories of hypertension (PM10, NO2, and O3) and cardio- and cerebrovascular disease (SO2 and NO2) (all p-values < 0.10). However, no clear effect modifying patterns were observed across all pollutants.
The summary statistics of short-term exposure to air pollutants and Spearman’s correlation coefficients among short- and long-term metrics are described in Tables S6 and S7. The models simultaneously adjusting for the short-term exposure measures without interaction terms remained stable or demonstrated slightly attenuated effect estimates (Table S8). When additionally adjusting for the multiplicative interaction term between long- and short-term exposure, it appeared that the effect estimates in our linear models were stronger for SO2 and NO2, whereas O3 demonstrated an attenuated effect and was no longer statistically significant. The significant association between SO2 and low-grade inflammation identified in the main model changed to non-significant in models with and without the interaction term. In two-pollutant models, some associations observed with single pollutants were attenuated after adjusting for a second pollutant (Table S9). The combined effect estimates for PMs were attenuated after adjusting for each other. Similarly, the estimates for gaseous pollutants (SO2, NO2, O3) weakened substantially after adding PM10 to the model.
We also considered another sensitivity analysis for participants who did not change their residential address between baseline and the first phase of follow-up (Table S10). When the level of hs-CRP was treated as a continuous or dichotomous variable, the estimated effects remained stable, and the direction of the association did not differ largely from the main model. The odds of low-grade inflammation became non-significant in PM2.5, while in the case of O3, a marginally reduced risk of low-grade inflammation (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.51, 1.00) was observed.

4. Discussion

4.1. Summary

This study investigated the association between long-term exposure to air pollutants and hs-CRP level. When the hs-CRP concentration was treated as a continuous variable, statistically significant and positive associations were observed for PM10, PM2.5, SO2, and NO2, while a negative association was found for O3. Further, an increased risk of low-grade inflammation (hs-CRP > 3 mg/L) was observed with PM10, PM2.5, and SO2. The odds ratios reported indicated that the exposures might be risk factors for inflammatory conditions; however, they did not reflect strong associations.

4.2. Comparisons of Findings

In this study, significant positive increases were observed in the 2-year average PMs, and the magnitude of association was larger for PM2.5 compared to PM10: 10 μg/m3 increase in PM10 and PM2.5 were associated with 6.38% (95% CI 4.55 to 8.24) and 10.27% (95% CI 7.09 to 13.54) increase in hs-CRP, respectively. PM2.5 exposure may be more hazardous to human health compared to PM10, as PM2.5 mainly originates from the secondary aerosol sources via a chemical reaction of gaseous pollutants (e.g., SO2 and NO2), whereas the constituents of PM10 are mainly contributed by soil dust and natural sources [36]. PM10 can also be deposited majorly in the large conducting airways, while PM2.5 can penetrate and reach the alveolar-capillary barrier, and then travel to other organs within the body; and therefore, PM2.5 may have a higher potential for inducing inflammation and oxidative stress [6,9].
Regarding the long-term exposure to PMs and the level of CRP, a meta-analysis with a pooled estimate of five and nine studies of long-term exposure to PM10 and PM2.5 indicated a significant 5.61% and 18.01% increase in CRP per 10 μg/m3 increase, respectively [17]. Several observational studies that examined both PM10 and PM2.5 have reported a greater impact of PM2.5 compared to PM10 [37,38,39]. A panel study of the capital city in Korea also demonstrated a slightly higher effect estimate in the association between CRP and PMs; per 10 μg/m3 increase in the annual average concentrations of PMs with 0.34 and 0.47 percent changes of CRP for PM10 and PM2.5, respectively [24]. The larger magnitude of the association of PMs with CRP in our study compared to that observed in a previous Korean study [24] may be partially explained by the exposure assessment methods, as the effect size of the subgroup of fixed-site monitoring studies tended to be lower than studies which used other measurement methods (e.g., modeled data or personal monitoring) [17].
Among gaseous pollutants, significant positive associations were observed with the hs-CRP levels in SO2 and NO2, while negative associations were observed in O3. Adjustment for ambient PM10 substantially attenuated the associations with SO2 and NO2 in both continuous and binary measures of hs-CRP, given that particles would partly capture the complex combustion-related constituents [40]. This conforms with the source apportionment of PMs in Korea that explained the secondary aerosol sources via the atmospheric chemical reaction of SO2 and NO2 originated from fuel combustion [36]. Accordingly, the significant effects of gaseous pollutants on hs-CRP in this study might have been due to the shared emission sources, with significantly correlated particulate and gaseous pollutants [21].
Several studies that measured multiple pollutants have also reported similar findings. Cross-sectional studies representative of the English population demonstrated positive but non-significant combined estimates for SO2 and NO2 with CRP, while the estimate for O3 was in the opposite direction [41]. Moreover, another cross-sectional study of the Chinese population reported that the annual ambient SO2 and NO2 concentrations were positively associated with low-grade inflammation (statistically significant for NO2 and non-significant for SO2), whereas O3 exposure exhibited a significant inverse association [42]. However, a recent meta-analysis on the association between gaseous air pollutants and CRP has reported conflicting results across studies; and in both short- and long-term gaseous pollutants and CRP levels, positive non-significant pooled estimates were observed for SO2, NO2, and O3 as well [18]. A review on the health effects of O3 suggested that in contrast to the well-established evidence from short-term studies, the evidence for the chronic effects is less conclusive and lacks research; therefore, further investigations are needed to better describe the relationship between O3 and chronic health endpoints [43].
Unlike other pollutants, long-term exposure to O3 demonstrated a decreased risk of hs-CRP and systemic low-grade inflammation in this study. There are uncertainties in interpreting this seemingly protective association, but several plausible explanations may be offered. First, as protective effects are not expected according to the literature and biological plausibility, the seemingly beneficial impact of O3 on the inflammatory response might have been artifacts of pollutants that were positively correlated with other factors and were negatively correlated with CRP (e.g., O3-derivatives) [44]. Second, O3 may have a threshold level for its effect on human health. A cross-sectional study in Germany identified a J-shaped association between short-term exposure to O3 and hs-CRP levels [45]. In particular, for participants with O3 concentration less than 120 µg/m3, the level of hs-CRP was negatively associated with O3 [45]. All participants in our study were exposed to O3 concentration far lower than 120 µg/m3. However, direct comparisons of the results should be cautiously interpreted due to possible differences between the mechanisms underlying short- and long-term exposure to O3 [42]. Lastly, O3 may actually show an inverse association with multiple metabolic abnormalities, including other markers of inflammation or coagulation, blood lipid profiles, and glucose homeostasis. A cross-sectional study in China found that long-term exposure to ambient NO2 and O3 were risk and protective factors of low-grade systemic inflammation, respectively; and also demonstrated that O3 was negatively associated with multiple metabolic indicators of lipid metabolism and glucose homeostasis, while NO2 was positively associated with them [42]. We also performed additional analyses and found that the blood levels of white blood cells, fibrinogen, triglycerides, and fasting blood glucose were positively associated with PMs, SO2, and NO2, and inversely associated with O3 (Table S11).

4.3. Sensitivity Analyses on Effect Modifications

Along with variations in the concentrations of air pollutants, the susceptibility of a population also plays a crucial role in inflammatory responses [14]. In this study, elderly participants, women, obese participants, sedentary participants, current smokers, and participants with comorbidities were potentially susceptible to air pollutants. However, there were no clear effect modifying patterns across all air pollutants.
Elderly individuals are generally considered more susceptible to the adverse health impacts of ambient air pollution [46]. Aging entails a substantial burden regarding the onset and exacerbation of chronic disorders, perturbations in immune system function, and changes in activity status [47,48]. These findings are consistent with the associations between pollutants and CRP reported by several observational studies of susceptible older individuals, including factors such as diabetes, obesity, hypertension, coronary heart disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [49,50,51,52]. Sex-based differences in immune and inflammatory responses may also partly explain the greater susceptibility to air pollutants observed in women. Compared to men, women may have a higher CD4+:CD8+ lymphocyte ratio; and when stimulated, their blood monocytes generate more prostaglandin E2 and less TNF-α [53].
Participants who were ex-smokers appeared to be less vulnerable to air pollutants, while current- or non-smokers exhibited greater vulnerability. Similar trends were reported in a cross-sectional study in Germany; however, the study stated that the generalizability of their results might have been limited because smokers tended to be younger and healthier (lower percentages of diabetes or cardiovascular disease) than were ex- or non-smokers [14]. When we also stratified the participants by smoking status, current smokers were younger and healthier (lower percentages of diabetes, hypertension, cardio- and cerebrovascular disease, cancer, or lung diseases) compared to ex-smokers, suggesting that differences in the participants’ characteristics may be the reason (Table S12). However, the potential modifying role of smoking on the air pollution-associated inflammatory response remains unclear. One hypothesis suggested that smoking itself may trigger anatomical damage, which may exert additional harmful effects and exacerbate the adverse effects of ambient air pollution [54,55,56]. Studies supportive of this perspective have suggested that inflammatory responses to air pollutants appeared to be more pronounced in smokers [52,57,58,59]. A controversial hypothesis explained that smokers may have elevated levels of oxidative stress and inflammatory response, and relatively small variations in levels of inflammatory markers could be attributed to ambient air pollution; on the other hand, non-smokers may have minimal influence from smoking-induced inflammation [60]. Studies supportive of this perspective have suggested that inflammatory responses to air pollutants appeared to be more pronounced in non-smokers [38,60,61].
Moreover, participants who were not maintaining regular physical activity or were obese appeared to be more vulnerable to air pollutants in this study. Similar results were reported by a Taiwanese cohort study; compared with inactive participants with PM2.5 in the highest quartile, participants in other groups had lower white blood cell counts, especially among those with higher levels of physical activity and lower exposure to PM2.5 [62]. A higher frequency of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity was significantly associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular diseases in the groups of both high and low PMs as well [63]. Except for the extremely polluted environments, the benefits of physical activity may outweigh the health risks caused by air pollution [64]. According to a systematic review of air pollution on obesity, the probable biological pathways in the included studies involved enhanced oxidative stress and inflammatory responses of adipose tissues, elevated risk of chronic comorbidities, and insufficient physical activity; however, the impact of pollution on the body weight status remained unclear [65].
Cumulatively, the evidence on the extent to which individual characteristics modify the effect of air pollution through inflammation remains controversial across studies. The results should be interpreted cautiously due to complexities including geographic regions, study design, selection of the subpopulation, and types, sources, composition, toxicity, or dose of pollutants. However, it should be noted that the global health burden of air pollution and lifestyle habits co-exists and the annual level of PM among participants exceeds the annual AQG provided by the WHO [34]. Therefore, public health interventions to maintain healthier lifestyles may potentially minimize the detrimental health impacts due to ambient air pollutants (e.g., elevated inflammatory responses and increased risk of multiple chronic diseases) and should be incorporated into air pollution reduction strategies.

4.4. Sensitivity Analyses on Extended Models including Short-Term Measures and Co-Pollutants

To examine the attenuation of the chronic effects of air pollutants by their acute effects, we simultaneously adjusted for short-term exposure measures of corresponding pollutants (3-day average) in our models. The results remained stable or demonstrated slightly attenuated effect estimates. Short-term air pollution exposure may potentially affect the long-term associations between inflammatory markers and outdoor air pollution exposure; however, participants with potential acute infections (hs-CRP levels > 10 mg/L) were excluded before analysis, which may have reduced the potential confounding effect of short-term exposure to air pollutants on the chronic health effects of air pollutants [48]. Previous epidemiological studies of long-term exposure to air pollutants on hs-CRP levels also included participants with hs-CRP levels less than 10 mg/L and demonstrated stable estimates which were not affected by adjusting for short-term exposure to air pollution [38,66]. A previous study in a single capital city in Korea with participants with CRP levels ranging from 0.1 to 11.7 mg/L did not report any significant changes after adjusting for short-term exposure, whereas the white blood cell counts, another clinical marker of inflammation and a potential predictor of cardiovascular risk, demonstrated significant changes in the long-term association with air pollution after adjustment; further investigations are suggested to confirm these findings [24].
As humans are exposed to polluted air containing a complex mixture of particle and gaseous pollutants rather than an isolated single pollutant, multi-pollutant concepts should also be considered [67,68]. Therefore, to evaluate the remaining predictive effects of air pollutants, we simultaneously adjusted for other co-pollutants by adding one pollutant at each time in our two-pollutant models. The effect estimates for PMs were attenuated after adjusting for each other and the effect estimates of PM10 decreased from 6.38 to 5.69 while PM2.5 estimates decreased from 10.27 to 1.73 (units: per 10 µg/m3 increase). Similar two-pollutant associations were also observed in the previous cross-sectional study with PMs controlled for each other; the effect estimates of PM10 increased slightly from 5.15 to 7.34 while PM2.5 estimates decreased largely from 0.16 to −5.61 (units: per IQR increase) [14]. This phenomenon suggests non-independent effects of PM10 and PM2.5 on hs-CRP and may strengthen the importance of PM10 based on the substantial heterogeneity of exposure levels across the study regions compared to PM2.5 [14]. We also observed that the effect estimates for gaseous pollutants (SO2, NO2, O3) weakened substantially after adding PM10 to the model: the effect estimates were largely attenuated from 30.77 to 16.81, 5.22 to 1.74, and −16.13 to −7.74 for SO2, NO2, and O3, respectively (units: per 10 µg/m3 increase). Compared to PM10, adjustment for PM2.5 attenuated the effect estimates of gaseous pollutants to a lesser extent and the estimates changed to 24.94, 5.69, and −15.46 for SO2, NO2, and O3, respectively (units: per 10 µg/m3 increase). The greater change of effect estimates in the two-pollutant models compared to single-pollutant models may possibly be due to the stronger correlation coefficients of gas phase pollutants with PM10 than that of PM2.5. However, the two-pollutant associations should be analyzed and interpreted cautiously. As a strong correlation within pollutants in the regression models may become highly unstable, we incorporated the restriction of Spearman inter-correlation between pollutants below 0.70 [14,69]. Therefore, the results for the combination of NO2 and O3 with high correlation (rs = −0.78) were not reported. Investigating multi-pollutant model to air pollutant research is also challenging due to the other factors including complicated formation pathways, diverse classes of measurement errors (e.g., differential errors across pollutants), and complex epidemiological interpretation (e.g., health effects due to ambient gaseous pollutants which may actually be a result of PM exposure) [69,70,71].

4.5. Strengths and Limitations

The strengths of this study are as follows. First, the participants exhibited spatial variability, indicated by their diverse domestic geographical residence around the country. Second, diverse individual-level information (e.g., variables of socioeconomic status and lifestyle factors) was available. Third, the ambient air quality prediction model enabled air pollution research not only for the residents in capital or metropolitan areas, but also for those in non-metropolitan areas, where the measurement points are scarce [22]. Especially, the model that incorporated satellite-based reanalysis enabled the estimates of PMs with high resolution, despite the absence of air quality monitoring station data of PM2.5 before 2015. Lastly, we attempted to account for residential mobility by considering time-weighted average concentrations of air pollutants. However, the follow-up time between the baseline and follow-up differed for each participant (mean and standard deviation: 4.9 ± 1.7 years). Further linkage with personal records that contain each participant’s annual residential mobility, and the length of exposure needs to be traced [72].
The potential limitations of this study should also be considered. First, due to the cross-sectional design, temporal trends and causal effects of air pollutants on hs-CRP are difficult to determine. Circulating inflammatory markers are in a physiologically varying state; and studies with longitudinal designs or multiple measurements may diminish potential biases more effectively and identify the associations more accurately [73]. Second, potential exposure measurement errors might exist because of the use of the predictions of air pollutants as proxy exposure measurements assigned to the participants’ residences to evaluate the inflammatory effects of pollutants. The exposure misclassification can be increased by the absence of the individuals’ specific activity patterns; however, the exposure data based on indoor combustion sources and occupational contributions were unavailable. Accordingly, both classical and Berkson errors might arise; however, the errors can bias toward the null, suggesting the estimated effect is unlikely to be exaggerated [74,75]. The high-resolution ambient air quality prediction models may result in a smaller bias, which suggests robustness against the exposure error [75]. However, the performance of SO2 in our CMAQ models (R2 = 0.42) should be discussed. A similar trend was also observed for SO2 in the US prediction models which utilized CMAQ with a 12 km grid; even after utilizing the data fusion methods to correct the biases associated with the model output by combining observed data to the CMAQ model, SO2 still performed the worst with the lowest R2 among the modeled pollutants [76,77]. SO2 predictions with CMAQ had the most error due to the challenges of coal combustion plumes [70,76]; and SO2 might have a less homogeneous spatial distribution [77]. Further optimization for the emission inventories is needed to improve the prediction accuracy of SO2 [78]. Third, our study lacked information on medication. Hs-CRP is largely affected by medication, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or lipid-lowering drugs, including statins [14]. Statins may reduce the associations between long-term pollutant exposure and hs-CRP due to the anti-inflammatory actions of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors [38]. However, no clear effect modifying patterns with regard to medications were observed in several studies [24,38]. Lastly, residual confounding might have existed in this study. One example is uncontrolled factors with regard to pollutants. In particular, O3 concentration is largely affected by local-scale as it is rapidly scavenged by nitric oxide near roadways; thus, considering the roadway proximity is important [42]. However, we could not control for residential distances from main roadways in our models and assess whether the association between ambient O3 and hs-CRP remains stable.

5. Conclusions

This study investigated the association between long-term exposure to air pollutants and hs-CRP, which is a non-specific marker of inflammation, among participants residing in domestic regions in Korea. Most of the outcomes persisted when hs-CRP was treated as either a continuous variable or as a dichotomous variable using a threshold of 3 mg/L (positive associations for PM10, PM2.5, SO2, and NO2, and negative associations for O3).
Further well-designed research (e.g., longitudinal, or multiple measurements) with sufficient information on annual residential changes, occupation, indoor exposure, and geographical factors may help elucidate the relationship between inflammatory markers and long-term exposure to gaseous pollutants or chemical constituents involved in the probable mechanistic pathways.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijerph191811585/s1, Table S1. Configurations for the meteorology, emission, and chemical transport model used in this study. Table S2. Summary of the model performance evaluation (2010–2017). Table S3. Sensitivity analysis on the models with candidate covariates for the associations between hs-CRP levels and long-term exposure to air pollutants. Table S4. Effect modifications of associations between hs-CRP levels and long-term air pollutant concentrations by participant characteristics; Table S5. Effect modifications of associations between systemic low-grade inflammation and long-term air pollutant concentrations by participant characteristics; Table S6. Summary statistics of the short-term residential air pollution exposure (3-day average); Table S7. Spearman correlation coefficients of short- and long-term residential air pollution exposure and meteorological factors; Table S8. Sensitivity analysis on extended model including short-term exposure measures as further covariates to the main model; Table S9. Sensitivity analysis on extended model including co-pollutants as further covariates to the main model; Table S10. Sensitivity analysis on participants with the same place of residence; Table S11. Associations between other inflammatory and metabolic biomarkers and long-term exposure to air pollutants; Table S12. General characteristics of the study participants stratified by smoking status; Figure S1. Spatial distribution of the geocoded residential addresses and the long-term air pollutant concentrations of the 60,581 participants in Korea.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.H.K., H.D.W., J.H.L. and K.L.; methodology, J.H.K., H.D.W., J.H.L. and K.L.; software, J.H.K., D.S.S. and S.C.; formal analysis, J.H.K.; resources, D.S.S. and S.C.; data curation, D.S.S. and S.C.; writing—original draft preparation, J.H.K.; writing—review and editing, J.H.K., K.L., J.H.L. and H.D.W.; visualization, S.C.; supervision, K.L.; project administration, K.L. and H.D.W.; funding acquisition, K.L. and H.D.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Korea National Institute of Health, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (Grant No. 2019-NI-100-02; 2022-NI-057-00).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board Committee of the Korea National Institute of Health, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (Approval No. 2019-05-04-2C-A; 2022-04-04-P-A).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all participants involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data in this study were from the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (KoGES; 4851-302), Korea National Institute of Health, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Korea.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge Youn-Seo Koo, Hui-Young Yun, and Dae-Ryun Choi for their sincere efforts for the geographic estimation of air pollutants.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Ambient Air Pollution: A global Assessment of Exposure and Burden of Disease. 2016. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/250141 (accessed on 20 February 2022).
  2. Cohen, A.J.; Brauer, M.; Burnett, R.; Anderson, H.R.; Frostad, J.; Estep, K.; Balakrishnan, K.; Brunekreef, B.; Dandona, L.; Dandona, R. Estimates and 25-year trends of the global burden of disease attributable to ambient air pollution: An analysis of data from the Global Burden of Diseases Study 2015. Lancet 2017, 389, 1907–1918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Stanaway, J.D.; Afshin, A.; Gakidou, E.; Lim, S.S.; Abate, D.; Abate, K.H.; Abbafati, C.; Abbasi, N.; Abbastabar, H.; Abd Allah, F. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2018, 392, 1923–1994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cohen, A.J.; Ross Anderson, H.; Ostro, B.; Pandey, K.D.; Krzyzanowski, M.; Künzli, N.; Gutschmidt, K.; Pope, A.; Romieu, I.; Samet, J.M. The global burden of disease due to outdoor air pollution. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 2005, 68, 1301–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Burnett, R.; Chen, H.; Szyszkowicz, M.; Fann, N.; Hubbell, B.; Pope, C.A.; Apte, J.S.; Brauer, M.; Cohen, A.; Weichenthal, S. Global estimates of mortality associated with long-term exposure to outdoor fine particulate matter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 9592–9597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Franklin, B.A.; Brook, R.; Pope III, C.A. Air pollution and cardiovascular disease. Curr. Probl. Cardiol. 2015, 40, 207–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kelly, F.; Fussell, J. Air pollution and airway disease. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2011, 41, 1059–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Block, M.L.; Calderón Garcidueñas, L. Air pollution: Mechanisms of neuroinflammation and CNS disease. Trends Neurosci. 2009, 32, 506–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Arias Pérez, R.D.; Taborda, N.A.; Gómez, D.M.; Narvaez, J.F.; Porras, J.; Hernandez, J.C. Inflammatory effects of particulate matter air pollution. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 42390–42404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fiorito, G.; Vlaanderen, J.; Polidoro, S.; Gulliver, J.; Galassi, C.; Ranzi, A.; Krogh, V.; Grioni, S.; Agnoli, C.; Sacerdote, C. Oxidative stress and inflammation mediate the effect of air pollution on cardio-and cerebrovascular disease: A prospective study in nonsmokers. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 2018, 59, 234–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Van Eeden, S.F.; Tan, W.C.; Suwa, T.; Mukae, H.; Terashima, T.; Fujii, T.; Qui, D.; Vincent, R.; Hogg, J.C. Cytokines involved in the systemic inflammatory response induced by exposure to particulate matter air pollutants (PM10). Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2001, 164, 826–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Stoner, L.; Lucero, A.A.; Palmer, B.R.; Jones, L.M.; Young, J.M.; Faulkner, J. Inflammatory biomarkers for predicting cardiovascular disease. Clin. Biochem. 2013, 46, 1353–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Pearson, T.A.; Mensah, G.A.; Alexander, R.W.; Anderson, J.L.; Cannon III, R.O.; Criqui, M.; Fadl, Y.Y.; Fortmann, S.P.; Hong, Y.; Myers, G.L. Markers of inflammation and cardiovascular disease: Application to clinical and public health practice: A statement for healthcare professionals from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American Heart Association. Circulation 2003, 107, 499–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Pilz, V.; Wolf, K.; Breitner, S.; Rückerl, R.; Koenig, W.; Rathmann, W.; Cyrys, J.; Peters, A.; Schneider, A.; for the KORA-Study Group. C-reactive protein (CRP) and long-term air pollution with a focus on ultrafine particles. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2018, 221, 510–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Castro, A.R.; Silva, S.O.; Soares, S.C. The use of high sensitivity C-reactive protein in cardiovascular disease detection. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2018, 21, 496–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ito, F.; Sono, Y.; Ito, T. Measurement and clinical significance of lipid peroxidation as a biomarker of oxidative stress: Oxidative stress in diabetes, atherosclerosis, and chronic inflammation. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, Q.; Gu, X.; Deng, F.; Mu, L.; Baccarelli, A.A.; Guo, X.; Wu, S. Ambient particulate air pollution and circulating C-reactive protein level: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2019, 222, 756–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Xu, Z.; Wang, W.; Liu, Q.; Li, Z.; Lei, L.; Ren, L.; Deng, F.; Guo, X.; Wu, S. Association between gaseous air pollutants and biomarkers of systemic inflammation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 292, 118336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Koenig, W. Update on C-reactive protein as a risk marker in cardiovascular disease. Kidney Int. 2003, 63, S58–S61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Huttunen, K.; Siponen, T.; Salonen, I.; Yli-Tuomi, T.; Aurela, M.; Dufva, H.; Hillamo, R.; Linkola, E.; Pekkanen, J.; Pennanen, A. Low-level exposure to ambient particulate matter is associated with systemic inflammation in ischemic heart disease patients. Environ. Res. 2012, 116, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, X.Y.; Hu, W.; Tong, S. Long-term exposure to gaseous air pollutants and cardio-respiratory mortality in Brisbane, Australia. Geospat. Health 2009, 3, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Hwang, M.J.; Sung, J.; Yoon, M.; Kim, J.H.; Yun, H.Y.; Choi, D.R.; Koo, Y.S.; Oh, K.; Yun, S.; Cheong, H.K. Establishment of the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey air pollution study dataset for the researchers on the health impact of ambient air pollution. Epidemiol. Health 2021, 43, e2021015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hoek, G. Methods for assessing long-term exposures to outdoor air pollutants. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 2017, 4, 450–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lee, H.; Myung, W.; Jeong, B.H.; Choi, H.; Jhun, B.W.; Kim, H. Short-and long-term exposure to ambient air pollution and circulating biomarkers of inflammation in non-smokers: A hospital-based cohort study in South Korea. Environ. Int. 2018, 119, 264–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kim, Y.; Han, B.G.; Group, K. Cohort profile: The Korean genome and epidemiology study (KoGES) consortium. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2017, 46, e20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kim, H.J.; Min, J.Y.; Seo, Y.S.; Min, K.B. Association between exposure to ambient air pollution and renal function in Korean adults. Ann. Occup. Environ. Med. 2018, 30, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Koo, Y.S.; Choi, D.R.; Yun, H.Y.; Yoon, G.W.; Lee, J.B. A Development of PM Concentration Reanalysis Method using CMAQ with Surface Data Assimilation and MAIAC AOD in Korea. J. Korean Soc. Atmos. 2020, 36, 558–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Oudin, A.; Forsberg, B.; Strömgren, M.; Beelen, R.; Modig, L. Impact of residential mobility on exposure assessment in longitudinal air pollution studies: A sensitivity analysis within the ESCAPE project. Sci. World J. 2012, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Aretz, B.; Janssen, F.; Vonk, J.M.; Heneka, M.T.; Boezen, H.M.; Doblhammer, G. Long-term exposure to fine particulate matter, lung function and cognitive performance: A prospective Dutch cohort study on the underlying routes. Environ. Res. 2021, 201, 111533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jiang, M.; Kim, E.; Woo, Y. The relationship between economic growth and air pollution-a regional comparison between China and South Korea. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cho, S.M.J.; Lee, H.; Lee, H.H.; Baek, J.; Heo, J.E.; Joo, H.J.; Hong, S.J.; Kim, H.C. Dyslipidemia fact sheets in Korea 2020: An analysis of nationwide population-based data. J. Lipid Atheroscler. 2021, 10, 202–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific. The Asia-Pacific Perspective: Redefining Obesity and Its Treatment. 2000. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/206936 (accessed on 20 February 2022).
  33. Tolbert, P.E.; Klein, M.; Peel, J.L.; Sarnat, S.E.; Sarnat, J.A. Multipollutant modeling issues in a study of ambient air quality and emergency department visits in Atlanta. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2007, 17, S29–S35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. World Health Organization. WHO Global Air Quality Guidelines. Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PM10), Ozone, Nitrogen Dioxide, Sulfur Dioxide and Carbon Monoxide. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. 2021. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240034228 (accessed on 20 February 2022).
  35. Trnka, D. Policies, regulatory framework and enforcement for air quality management: The case of Korea. OECD Environ. Work Pap. 2020, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ryou, H.G.; Heo, J.; Kim, S.Y. Source apportionment of PM10 and PM2.5 air pollution, and possible impacts of study characteristics in South Korea. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 240, 963–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Huang, W.H.; Yen, T.H.; Chan, M.J.; Su, Y.J. Environmental carbon monoxide level is associated with the level of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein in peritoneal dialysis patients. Medicine 2014, 93, e181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Viehmann, A.; Hertel, S.; Fuks, K.; Eisele, L.; Moebus, S.; Möhlenkamp, S.; Nonnemacher, M.; Jakobs, H.; Erbel, R.; Jöckel, K.H. Long-term residential exposure to urban air pollution, and repeated measures of systemic blood markers of inflammation and coagulation. Occup. Environ. Med. 2015, 72, 656–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wolf, K.; Popp, A.; Schneider, A.; Breitner, S.; Hampel, R.; Rathmann, W.; Herder, C.; Roden, M.; Koenig, W.; Meisinger, C. Association between long-term exposure to air pollution and biomarkers related to insulin resistance, subclinical inflammation, and adipokines. Diabetes 2016, 65, 3314–3326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Adebayo Ojo, T.C.; Wichmann, J.; Arowosegbe, O.O.; Probst Hensch, N.; Schindler, C.; Künzli, N. Short-Term Joint Effects of PM10, NO2 and SO2 on Cardio-Respiratory Disease Hospital Admissions in Cape Town, South Africa. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Forbes, L.J.; Patel, M.D.; Rudnicka, A.R.; Cook, D.G.; Bush, T.; Stedman, J.R.; Whincup, P.H.; Strachan, D.P.; Anderson, R.H. Chronic exposure to outdoor air pollution and markers of systemic inflammation. Epidemiology 2009, 20, 245–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liu, K.; Cao, H.; Li, B.; Guo, C.; Zhao, W.; Han, X.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Z.; Tang, N.; Niu, K. Long-term exposure to ambient nitrogen dioxide and ozone modifies systematic low-grade inflammation: The CHCN-BTH study. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2022, 239, 113875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Nuvolone, D.; Petri, D.; Voller, F. The effects of ozone on human health. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2018, 25, 8074–8088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Day, D.B.; Xiang, J.; Mo, J.; Li, F.; Chung, M.; Gong, J.; Weschler, C.J.; Ohman Strickland, P.A.; Sundell, J.; Weng, W. Association of ozone exposure with cardiorespiratory pathophysiologic mechanisms in healthy adults. JAMA Intern. Med. 2017, 177, 1344–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zhao, T.; Markevych, I.; Standl, M.; Schikowski, T.; Berdel, D.; Koletzko, S.; Jörres, R.A.; Nowak, D.; Heinrich, J. Short-term exposure to ambient ozone and inflammatory biomarkers in cross-sectional studies of children and adolescents: Results of the GINIplus and LISA birth cohorts. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 255, 113264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Simoni, M.; Baldacci, S.; Maio, S.; Cerrai, S.; Sarno, G.; Viegi, G. Adverse effects of outdoor pollution in the elderly. J. Thorac. Dis. 2015, 7, 34–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Boss, G.R.; Seegmiller, J.E. Age-related physiological changes and their clinical significance. West. J. Med. 1981, 135, 434–440. [Google Scholar]
  48. Elbarbary, M.; Oganesyan, A.; Honda, T.; Morgan, G.; Guo, Y.; Guo, Y.; Negin, J. Systemic inflammation (C-Reactive Protein) in older Chinese adults is associated with long-term exposure to ambient air pollution. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 3258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Dubowsky, S.D.; Suh, H.; Schwartz, J.; Coull, B.A.; Gold, D.R. Diabetes, obesity, and hypertension may enhance associations between air pollution and markers of systemic inflammation. Environ. Health Perspect. 2006, 114, 992–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Ruckerl, R.; Ibald-Mulli, A.; Koenig, W.; Schneider, A.; Woelke, G.; Cyrys, J.; Heinrich, J.; Marder, V.; Frampton, M.; Wichmann, H.E. Air pollution and markers of inflammation and coagulation in patients with coronary heart disease. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2006, 173, 432–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Dadvand, P.; Nieuwenhuijsen, M.J.; Agustí, À.; De Batlle, J.; Benet, M.; Beelen, R.; Cirach, M.; Martinez, D.; Hoek, G.; Basagaña, X. Air pollution and biomarkers of systemic inflammation and tissue repair in COPD patients. Eur. Respir. J. 2014, 44, 603–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ostro, B.; Malig, B.; Broadwin, R.; Basu, R.; Gold, E.B.; Bromberger, J.T.; Derby, C.; Feinstein, S.; Greendale, G.A.; Jackson, E.A. Chronic PM2.5 exposure and inflammation: Determining sensitive subgroups in mid-life women. Environ. Res. 2014, 132, 168–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Oliveira, M.S.d.; Leon, A.P.d.; Mattos, I.E.; Koifman, S. Differential susceptibility according to gender in the association between air pollution and mortality from respiratory diseases. Cad. Saude Publica 2011, 27, 1827–1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lee, J.; Taneja, V.; Vassallo, R. Cigarette smoking and inflammation: Cellular and molecular mechanisms. J. Dent. Res. 2012, 91, 142–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Yanbaeva, D.G.; Dentener, M.A.; Creutzberg, E.C.; Wesseling, G.; Wouters, E.F. Systemic effects of smoking. Chest 2007, 131, 1557–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Turner, M.C.; Cohen, A.; Burnett, R.T.; Jerrett, M.; Diver, W.R.; Gapstur, S.M.; Krewski, D.; Samet, J.M.; Pope III, C.A. Interactions between cigarette smoking and ambient PM2.5 for cardiovascular mortality. Environ. Res. 2017, 154, 304–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Hajat, A.; Allison, M.; Diez Roux, A.V.; Jenny, N.S.; Jorgensen, N.W.; Szpiro, A.A.; Vedal, S.; Kaufman, J.D. Long-term exposure to air pollution and markers of inflammation, coagulation, and endothelial activation: A repeat-measures analysis in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Epidemiology 2015, 26, 310–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Dabass, A.; Talbott, E.O.; Venkat, A.; Rager, J.; Marsh, G.M.; Sharma, R.K.; Holguin, F. Association of exposure to particulate matter (PM2.5) air pollution and biomarkers of cardiovascular disease risk in adult NHANES participants (2001–2008). Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2016, 219, 301–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Baccarelli, A.; Zanobetti, A.; Martinelli, I.; Grillo, P.; Hou, L.; Lanzani, G.; Mannucci, P.M.; Bertazzi, P.A.; Schwartz, J. Air pollution, smoking, and plasma homocysteine. Environ. Health Perspect. 2007, 115, 176–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Panasevich, S.; Leander, K.; Rosenlund, M.; Ljungman, P.; Bellander, T.; de Faire, U.; Pershagen, G.; Nyberg, F. Associations of long-and short-term air pollution exposure with markers of inflammation and coagulation in a population sample. Occup. Environ. Med. 2009, 66, 747–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hoffmann, B.; Moebus, S.; Dragano, N.; Stang, A.; Möhlenkamp, S.; Schmermund, A.; Memmesheimer, M.; Bröcker Preuss, M.; Mann, K.; Erbel, R. Chronic residential exposure to particulate matter air pollution and systemic inflammatory markers. Environ. Health Perspect. 2009, 117, 1302–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhang, Z.; Hoek, G.; Chang, L.Y.; Chan, T.C.; Guo, C.; Chuang, Y.C.; Chan, J.; Lin, C.; Jiang, W.K.; Guo, Y. Particulate matter air pollution, physical activity and systemic inflammation in Taiwanese adults. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2018, 221, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kim, S.R.; Choi, S.; Keum, N.N.; Park, S.M. Combined effects of physical activity and air pollution on cardiovascular disease: A population-based study. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2020, 9, e013611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Tainio, M.; de Nazelle, A.J.; Götschi, T.; Kahlmeier, S.; Rojas-Rueda, D.; Nieuwenhuijsen, M.J.; de Sá, T.H.; Kelly, P.; Woodcock, J. Can air pollution negate the health benefits of cycling and walking? Prev. Med. 2016, 87, 233–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. An, R.; Ji, M.; Yan, H.; Guan, C. Impact of ambient air pollution on obesity: A systematic review. Int. J. Obes. 2018, 42, 1112–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Hennig, F.; Fuks, K.; Moebus, S.; Weinmayr, G.; Memmesheimer, M.; Jakobs, H.; Bröcker Preuss, M.; Führer Sakel, D.; Möhlenkamp, S.; Erbel, R. Association between source-specific particulate matter air pollution and hs-CRP: Local traffic and industrial emissions. Environ. Health Perspect. 2014, 122, 703–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Billionnet, C.; Sherrill, D.; Annesi Maesano, I. Estimating the health effects of exposure to multi-pollutant mixture. Ann. Epidemiol. 2012, 22, 126–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Vedal, S.; Kaufman, J.D. What does multi-pollutant air pollution research mean? Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2011, 183, 4–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Dominici, F.; Peng, R.D.; Barr, C.D.; Bell, M.L. Protecting human health from air pollution: Shifting from a single-pollutant to a multi-pollutant approach. Epidemiology 2010, 21, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Xiao, Q.; Liu, Y.; Mulholland, J.A.; Russell, A.G.; Darrow, L.A.; Tolbert, P.E.; Strickland, M.J. Pediatric emergency department visits and ambient Air pollution in the US State of Georgia: A case-crossover study. Environ. Health 2016, 15, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sarnat, J.A.; Schwartz, J.; Catalano, P.J.; Suh, H.H. Gaseous pollutants in particulate matter epidemiology: Confounders or surrogates? Environ. Health Perspect. 2001, 109, 1053–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zijlema, W.L.; Smidt, N.; Klijs, B.; Morley, D.W.; Gulliver, J.; de Hoogh, K.; Scholtens, S.; Rosmalen, J.G.; Stolk, R.P. The LifeLines Cohort Study: A resource providing new opportunities for environmental epidemiology. Arch. Public Health 2016, 74, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Song, J.; Zhu, J.; Tian, G.; Li, H.; Li, H.; An, Z.; Jiang, J.; Fan, W.; Wang, G.; Zhang, Y. Short time exposure to ambient ozone and associated cardiovascular effects: A panel study of healthy young adults. Environ. Int. 2020, 137, 105579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Armstrong, B.G. Effect of measurement error on epidemiological studies of environmental and occupational exposures. Occup. Environ. Med. 1998, 55, 651–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Wei, Y.; Qiu, X.; Yazdi, M.D.; Shtein, A.; Shi, L.; Yang, J.; Peralta, A.A.; Coull, B.A.; Schwartz, J.D. The impact of exposure measurement error on the estimated concentration–response relationship between long-term exposure to PM2.5 and mortality. Environ. Health Perspect. 2022, 130, 077006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Hao, H.; Chang, H.H.; Holmes, H.A.; Mulholland, J.A.; Klein, M.; Darrow, L.A.; Strickland, M.J. Air pollution and preterm birth in the US state of Georgia (2002–2006): Associations with concentrations of 11 ambient air pollutants estimated by combining Community Multiscale Air Quality Model (CMAQ) simulations with stationary monitor measurements. Environ. Health Perspect. 2016, 124, 875–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Senthilkumar, N.; Gilfether, M.; Metcalf, F.; Russell, A.G.; Mulholland, J.A.; Chang, H.H. Application of a fusion method for gas and particle air pollutants between observational data and chemical transport model simulations over the contiguous United States for 2005–2014. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 3314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Hu, Y.; Zang, Z.; Chen, D.; Ma, X.; Liang, Y.; You, W.; Pan, X.; Wang, L.; Wang, D.; Zhang, Z. Optimization and evaluation of SO2 emissions based on WRF-Chem and 3DVAR data assimilation. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijerph 19 11585 g001 550
Figure 1. Flow chart of the study participants.
Figure 1. Flow chart of the study participants.
Ijerph 19 11585 g001
Ijerph 19 11585 g002 550
Figure 2. Associations between hs-CRP levels and long-term exposure to air pollutants. The models are adjusted for age, sex, BMI, smoking status, drinking status, regular exercise, occupation, education, marital status, residential area, year, season, and weekday of examination, medical history of diseases (diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, cardio- and cerebrovascular disease, and cancer), and meteorological factors (2-day moving average of temperature and relative humidity). Estimates are presented as percentage changes with 95% confidence intervals in hs-CRP levels per IQR increase in 2-year average ambient air pollution exposure (corresponding IQR of each pollutant: 5.95 μg/m3 for PM10, 3.70 μg/m3 for PM2.5, 1.80 ppb for SO2, 12.54 ppb for NO2, and 4.52 ppb for O3). PM10, PM2.5: particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter < 10 μm and <2.5 μm, respectively; SO2: sulfur dioxide; NO2: nitrogen dioxide; O3: ozone; Hs-CRP: high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; IQR: interquartile range; Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4: first, second, third, and fourth quartile, respectively.
Figure 2. Associations between hs-CRP levels and long-term exposure to air pollutants. The models are adjusted for age, sex, BMI, smoking status, drinking status, regular exercise, occupation, education, marital status, residential area, year, season, and weekday of examination, medical history of diseases (diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, cardio- and cerebrovascular disease, and cancer), and meteorological factors (2-day moving average of temperature and relative humidity). Estimates are presented as percentage changes with 95% confidence intervals in hs-CRP levels per IQR increase in 2-year average ambient air pollution exposure (corresponding IQR of each pollutant: 5.95 μg/m3 for PM10, 3.70 μg/m3 for PM2.5, 1.80 ppb for SO2, 12.54 ppb for NO2, and 4.52 ppb for O3). PM10, PM2.5: particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter < 10 μm and <2.5 μm, respectively; SO2: sulfur dioxide; NO2: nitrogen dioxide; O3: ozone; Hs-CRP: high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; IQR: interquartile range; Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4: first, second, third, and fourth quartile, respectively.
Ijerph 19 11585 g002
Ijerph 19 11585 g003 550
Figure 3. Associations between systemic low-grade inflammation and long-term exposure to air pollutants. The models are adjusted for age, sex, BMI, smoking status, drinking status, regular exercise, occupation, education, marital status, residential area, year, season, and weekday of examination, medical history of diseases (diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, cardio- and cerebrovascular disease, and cancer), and meteorological factors (2-day moving average of temperature and relative humidity). Estimates are reported as the odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of low-grade inflammation (hs-CRP levels > 3 mg/L) per IQR increase in 2-year average ambient air pollution exposure (corresponding IQR of each pollutant: 5.95 μg/m3 for PM10, 3.70 μg/m3 for PM2.5, 1.80 ppb for SO2, 12.54 ppb for NO2, and 4.52 ppb for O3). PM10, PM2.5: particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter < 10 μm and <2.5 μm, respectively; SO2: sulfur dioxide; NO2: nitrogen dioxide; O3: ozone; OR: odds ratio; IQR: interquartile range; Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4: first, second, third, and fourth quartile, respectively.
Figure 3. Associations between systemic low-grade inflammation and long-term exposure to air pollutants. The models are adjusted for age, sex, BMI, smoking status, drinking status, regular exercise, occupation, education, marital status, residential area, year, season, and weekday of examination, medical history of diseases (diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, cardio- and cerebrovascular disease, and cancer), and meteorological factors (2-day moving average of temperature and relative humidity). Estimates are reported as the odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of low-grade inflammation (hs-CRP levels > 3 mg/L) per IQR increase in 2-year average ambient air pollution exposure (corresponding IQR of each pollutant: 5.95 μg/m3 for PM10, 3.70 μg/m3 for PM2.5, 1.80 ppb for SO2, 12.54 ppb for NO2, and 4.52 ppb for O3). PM10, PM2.5: particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter < 10 μm and <2.5 μm, respectively; SO2: sulfur dioxide; NO2: nitrogen dioxide; O3: ozone; OR: odds ratio; IQR: interquartile range; Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4: first, second, third, and fourth quartile, respectively.
Ijerph 19 11585 g003
Table
Table 1. General characteristics of the study participants.
Table 1. General characteristics of the study participants.
CharacteristicsTotal
(n = 60,581)		Hs-CRP ≤ 3 mg/L
(n = 57,630)		Hs-CRP > 3 mg/L
(n = 2951)		p-Value a
Age [years (mean ± SD)]58.7 ± 8.158.6 ± 8.160.1 ± 8.3<0.001
Age in categories [n (%)]
 41–64 years44,856 (74.0)42,855 (74.4)2001 (67.8)<0.001
 ≥65 years15,725 (26.0)14,775 (25.6)950 (32.2)
Sex [n (%)]
 Males20,282 (33.5)19,110 (33.2)1172 (39.7)<0.001
 Females40,299 (66.5)38,520 (66.8)1779 (60.3)
Body mass index [kg/m2 (mean ± SD)]23.9 ± 2.923.8 ± 2.924.9 ± 3.4<0.001
Body mass index in categories [n (%)]
 <25 kg/m240,993 (67.7)39,370 (68.3)1623 (55.0)<0.001
 ≥25 kg/m219,588 (32.3)18,260 (31.7)1328 (45.0)
Smoking status [n (%)]
 Non-smoker45,647 (75.4)43,601 (75.7)2046 (69.3)<0.001
 Ex-smoker10,252 (16.9)9699 (16.8)553 (18.7)
 Current smoker4682 (7.7)4330 (7.5)352 (11.9)
Drinking status [n (%)]
 Non-drinker31,544 (52.1)30,036 (52.1)1508 (51.1)0.023
 Ex-drinker4118 (6.8)3881 (6.7)237 (8.0)
 Current drinker24,919 (41.1)23,713 (41.2)1206 (40.9)
Regular exercise [n (%)]
 Yes35,617 (58.8)34,058 (59.1)1559 (52.8)<0.001
 No24,964 (41.2)23,572 (40.9)1392 (47.2)
Occupation [n (%)]
 Professional, administrative6339 (10.5)6072 (10.5)267 (9.1)0.015
 Office, sales, and service13,578 (22.4)12,946 (22.5)632 (21.4)
 Laborer, agricultural9037 (14.9)8569 (14.9)468 (15.9)
 Others, unemployed31,627 (52.2)30,043 (52.1)1584 (53.7)
Education [n (%)]
 Less than middle school (<9 years)9158 (15.1)8606 (14.9)552 (18.7)<0.001
 High school (9–12 years)32,834 (54.2)31,211 (54.2)1623 (55.0)
 College or more (>12 years)18,589 (30.7)17,813 (30.9)776 (26.3)
Marital status [n (%)]
 Married, cohabitating53,778 (88.8)51,181 (88.8)2597 (88.0)0.186
 Single, divorced, widowed, separation, others6803 (11.2)6449 (11.2)354 (12.0)
Medical history
 Diabetes [n (%)]
 Yes8161 (13.5)7584 (13.2)577 (19.6)<0.001
 No52,420 (86.5)50,046 (86.8)2374 (80.4)
 Hypertension [n (%)]
 Yes20,982 (34.6)19,690 (34.2)1292 (43.8)<0.001
 No39,599 (65.4)37,940 (65.8)1659 (56.2)
 Dyslipidemia [n (%)]
 Yes25,092 (41.4)23,746 (41.2)1346 (45.6)<0.001
 No35,489 (58.6)33,884 (58.8)1605 (54.4)
 CCVD [n (%)]
 Yes3390 (5.6)3183 (5.5)207 (7.0)0.001
 No57,191 (94.4)54,447 (94.5)2744 (93.0)
 Cancer [n (%)]
 Yes3637 (6.0)3427 (5.9)210 (7.1)0.010
 No56,944 (94.0)54,203 (94.1)2741 (92.9)
 Asthma [n (%)]
 Yes1348 (2.2)1255 (2.2)93 (3.2)0.001
 No59,233 (97.8)56,375 (97.8)2858 (96.8)
 COPD [n (%)]
 Yes110 (0.2)98 (0.2)12 (0.4)0.007
 No60,471 (99.8)57,532 (99.8)2939 (99.6)
Season [n (%)]
 Spring (March–May)8815 (14.6)8413 (14.6)402 (13.6)<0.001
 Summer (June–August)20,781 (34.3)19,854 (34.5)927 (31.4)
 Fall (September–November)23,693 (39.1)22,478 (39.0)1215 (41.2)
 Winter (December–February)7292 (12.0)6885 (12.0)407 (13.8)
Residential area [n (%)]
 Metropolitan37,860 (62.5)36,068 (62.6)1792 (60.7)0.044
 Non-metropolitan22,721 (37.5)21,562 (37.4)1159 (39.3)
Hs-CRP [mg/L (mean ± SD)]0.89 ± 1.140.68 ±0.574.95 ±1.77<0.001
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation for continuous variables and n (%) for categorical variables; SD: standard deviation; CCVD: Cardio- and cerebrovascular disease; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Hs-CRP: high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; a Student’s t-test for continuous variables and Chi-square test for categorical variables.
Table
Table 2. Summary statistics of the residential air pollution exposure (2-year average) and meteorological factors (2-day average), and corresponding Spearman correlation coefficients.
Table 2. Summary statistics of the residential air pollution exposure (2-year average) and meteorological factors (2-day average), and corresponding Spearman correlation coefficients.
Pollutant (Unit)Mean ± SDMaxQ3MedianQ1MinIQRSpearman’s Correlation Coefficient
PM10PM2.5SO2NO2O3TempRH
PM10 (μg/m3)48.34 ± 4.2579.0751.6248.1445.6729.545.951.000.59 *0.17 *0.50 *−0.66 *0.002−0.03 *
PM2.5 (μg/m3)25.20 ± 2.6939.0726.8524.8923.1512.953.70 1.00−0.10 *−0.13 *−0.09 *−0.0010.13 *
SO2 (ppb)5.40 ± 2.0726.035.844.824.041.651.80 1.000.62 *−0.22 *0.02 *−0.16 *
NO2 (ppb)23.46 ± 7.9640.8130.1321.2817.601.0012.54 1.00−0.78 *0.05 *−0.24 *
O3 (ppb)25.86 ± 2.9744.2728.2326.1623.7118.074.52 1.00−0.04 *0.14 *
Temp (°C)16.73 ± 8.6033.0823.2118.9511.35-18.4011.86 1.000.31 *
RH (%)70.76 ± 12.3299.9579.8471.7362.8218.9617.02 1.00
SD: standard deviation; Max: maximum; Min: minimum; Q1: first quartile; Q3: third quartile; IQR: interquartile range; PM10: particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter < 10 μm; PM2.5: particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter < 2.5 μm; SO2: sulfur dioxide; NO2: nitrogen dioxide; O3: ozone; Temp: temperature; RH: relative humidity; * p < 0.001.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, J.H.; Woo, H.D.; Choi, S.; Song, D.S.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, K. Long-Term Effects of Ambient Particulate and Gaseous Pollutants on Serum High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein Levels: A Cross-Sectional Study Using KoGES-HEXA Data. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 11585. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811585

AMA Style

Kim JH, Woo HD, Choi S, Song DS, Lee JH, Lee K. Long-Term Effects of Ambient Particulate and Gaseous Pollutants on Serum High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein Levels: A Cross-Sectional Study Using KoGES-HEXA Data. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(18):11585. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811585

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Ji Hyun, Hae Dong Woo, Sunho Choi, Dae Sub Song, Jung Hyun Lee, and Kyoungho Lee. 2022. "Long-Term Effects of Ambient Particulate and Gaseous Pollutants on Serum High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein Levels: A Cross-Sectional Study Using KoGES-HEXA Data" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 18: 11585. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811585

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop