You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
by
  • Daniele Nucci1,
  • Omar Enzo Santangelo2,* and
  • Sandro Provenzano3
  • et al.

Reviewer 1: Monica Tarcea Reviewer 2: Anonymous

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Interesting topic, strong statistics and study design, good results and adequate conclusion.

Need to rewrite the Abstract especially the 26-27 line, it cant be well understood the idea of that sentence. Pay attention to references order.

I agree to be published after minor revision.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer, Thank you for helping us implement the manuscript. As suggested we modified the abstract and made sure to reorder the bibliography. See attached manuscript.

Kind regards.

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

This is a well-written paper with sound methodology and with some interesting findings. It also provides a proof-of-concept for future studies. I do not have any comments. 

Author Response

Dear reviewer, thank you for your comment.