Next Article in Journal
Informing State-Wide Coalition Efforts to Implement and Integrate Nutrition Best Practices in Early Care and Education: Focus Group Insights from Child Care Providers
Previous Article in Journal
Predictors of Workplace Substance Reuse among Patients with Alcohol or Illegal Substance Use Disorder in the Workplace
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 19
Issue 16
10.3390/ijerph191610024
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparative Analysis of Bacillariophyceae Chloroplast Genomes Uncovers Extensive Genome Rearrangements Associated with Speciation

by
Yichao Wang
1,2,3,4,
Jing Wang
1,2,4,
Yang Chen
1,2,3,4,
Shuya Liu
1,2,4,
Yongfang Zhao
2,5 and
Nansheng Chen
1,2,4,6,*
1
CAS Key Laboratory of Marine Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266071, China
2
Laboratory of Marine Ecology and Environmental Science, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao 266237, China
3
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
4
Center for Ocean Mega-Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266071, China
5
Jiaozhou Bay National Marine Ecosystem Research Station, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266071, China
6
Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(16), 10024; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610024
Submission received: 20 July 2022 / Revised: 7 August 2022 / Accepted: 12 August 2022 / Published: 14 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Science and Engineering)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The Bacillariophyceae is a species-rich, ecologically significant class of Bacillariophyta. Despite their critical importance in marine ecosystems as primary producers and in the development of harmful algal blooms (HABs), taxonomic research on Bacillariophyceae species has been hindered because of their limited morphological features, plasticity of morphologies, and the low resolution of common molecular markers. Hence molecular markers with improved resolution are urgently needed. Organelle genomes, which can be constructed efficiently with the recent development of high throughput DNA sequencing technologies and the advancement of bioinformatics tools, have been proposed as super barcodes for their higher resolution for distinguishing different species and intra-species genomic variations. In this study, we tested the value of full-length chloroplast genomes (cpDNAs) as super barcodes for distinguishing diatom species, by constructing cpDNAs of 11 strains of the class Bacillariophyceae, including Nitzschia ovalis, Nitzschia traheaformis, Cylindrotheca spp., Psammodictyon constrictum, Bacillaria paxillifer, two strains of Haslea tsukamotoi, Haslea avium, Navicula arenaria, and Pleurosigma sp. Comparative analysis of cpDNAs revealed that cpDNAs were not only adequate for resolving different species, but also for enabling recognition of high levels of genome rearrangements between cpDNAs of different species, especially for species of the genera Nitzschia, Cylindrotheca, Navicula and Haslea. Additionally, comparative analysis suggested that the positioning of species in the genus Haslea should be transferred to the genus Navicula. Chloroplast genome-based evolutionary analysis suggested that the Bacillariophyceae species first appeared during the Cretaceous period and the diversity of species rose after the mass extinction about 65 Mya. This study highlighted the value of cpDNAs in research on the biodiversity and evolution of Bacillariophyceae species, and, with the construction of more cpDNAs representing additional genera, deeper insight into the biodiversity and evolutionary relationships of Bacillariophyceae species will be gained.

1. Introduction

Diatoms (Bacillariophyta) constitute a major group of phytoplankton as free-living organisms in both marine and freshwater environments and play important roles in biogeochemical cycles and the functioning of aquatic food webs [1,2,3,4,5]. Diatoms play an essential part in the cycling of CO2, which has been proposed to be comparable to that of all terrestrial rainforests combined in global carbon cycling and to contribute to approximately 20% of the total primary production on Earth [4,6,7,8]. As diatoms are frequently found in subfossil and fossil records because their unique silicified cell walls are resistant to decay, fossil records of diatoms are often used as a source of information for phylogenetic reconstruction and archeological research [9].
The Bacillariophyceae is a species-rich, ecologically diverse class of diatoms—species in this class are ubiquitous and can be found from polar regions to the tropics [10]. The biological significance of Bacillariophyceae in the biosphere is significant for many species. For example, Nitzschia palea has been identified as a promising candidate for economic production of biodiesel because of its prolific biomass production and high intracellular lipid content [11,12]. Several Nitzschia species have been used as indicators of heavy metal contamination and have been applied in water quality monitoring [13,14,15]. Fragilariopsis kerguelensis contributes most of the vast deposits of biogenic silica beneath the Southern Ocean (Atlantic sector) and provides information for research concerning the ancient environment [16]. Some Bacillariaceae species, especially many Pseudo-nitzschia species, produce domoic acid, a toxin that causes amnesic shellfish poisoning and presents serious environmental toxicology threats [17,18]. Navicula species have been found to improve the settlement of Haliotis asinina larvae and contribute to faster growth [19]. A hexane extract of Navicula arenaria is used as a biological control for diseases caused by phytopathogenic fungi [20]. Haslea ostrearia can produce a water-soluble blue pigment which is responsible for the greening of oyster’s gills and enhances their value to the oyster industry [21]. Furthermore, this blue pigment has biological functions, including antioxidant, antibacterial and antiviral properties [22,23]. Fistulifera solaris has a high neutral lipid content and growth rate, and is beneficial for biodiesel production [24].
Despite their critical importance, taxonomic research on the species of Bacillariophyceae has been hindered by the small cell sizes and simple morphologies of these species, which make them difficult to observe and study. In addition, the number of species in the Bacillariophyceae is high, containing many hundreds of species, including many species in the orders Bacillariales and Naviculales. Nevertheless, researchers have sought to study Bacillariophyceae species using both morphology-based methods and molecular marker-based methods. Trobajo et al. made an attempt to clarify the taxonomy of Nitzschia species using morphology-based analysis [25]. Several phylogenetic studies of the Bacillariophyceae have been undertaken using the common molecular marker 18S rDNA [26,27]. These studies have improved our knowledge of Bacillariophyceae species. Despite these efforts, the results from phylogenetic studies using common molecular markers contained nodes with weak or no statistical support, suggesting that these common molecular markers are inadequate to represent genetic diversity.
Chloroplast genomes (cpDNAs) have been proposed to be “super barcodes” that have much higher resolution for distinguishing species for their longer sequence lengths than common molecular markers, and have been increasingly used in evolutionary studies [28,29,30]. Complete cpDNA sequences have also been widely used for evolutionary biology and ecological applications [31,32]. In addition, chloroplast genome sequences have revealed considerable variation within and between plant species in terms of both sequence and structural variation. Genome rearrangements influence gene order and configuration of gene clusters in all genomes [33]. Chloroplast genomes in most land plants share a highly conserved gene content and similar gene orders. However, the diversity of diatom cpDNA is sometimes high [34]. Driven by the development of DNA sequencing technologies and the advancement of bioinformatics analysis algorithms, more cpDNAs of species in Bacillariophyta have been fully constructed which help to provide valuable knowledge about phylogenetic relationships and evolutionary trajectories [35,36,37,38]. Nevertheless, the study of genome rearrangements and the speciation of Bacillariophyceae species has been limited.
In this study, we reported 11 complete cpDNAs for species in the class Bacillariophyceae including Nitzschia ovalis, Nitzschia traheaformis, two strains of Cylindrotheca sp., Psammodictyon constrictum, Bcillaria paxillifer, two strains of Haslea tsukamotoi, Haslea avium, Navicula arenaria and Pleurosigma sp. Comparative analysis of these cpDNAs revealed extensive genomic structural differences, including gene loss, gene duplication, and genome rearrangements. Furthermore, we also evaluated the speciation of Bacillariophyceae species.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Strain Isolation and Culturing

Eleven diatom strains studied in this project (CNS00113, CNS00381, CNS00383, CNS00409, CNS00433, CNS00435, CNS00419, CNS00432, CNS00319, CNS00326 and CNS00413) were isolated from water samples collected in Jiaozhou Bay, onboard the R/V Chuangxin, which was operated by the Jiaozhou Bay Marine Ecosystem Research Station, using single-cell capillary methods. Cells were cultured in L1 medium with 1‰ volume fraction Na2SiO3 with H2O added. The culture temperature was 18–20 °C and the illuminance was from 2000 Lux to 3000 Lux for a photoperiod of 12 h light–12 h dark, as previously described [39].

2.2. DNA Library Preparation and Whole Genome Sequencing

Total DNA was extracted using the DNAsecure Plant Kit (Tiangen Biotech, randomized controlled trial, Beijing, China) as previously described [39]. Genomic DNA samples were fragmented by sonication (Covaris S220, Covaris, Woburn, MA, USA) to a size of 350 bp. DNA fragments were then end-polished, A-tailed, and ligated with the full-length adapters for Illumina sequencing, followed by PCR (MiniAmp Thermal Cycler, ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA) enrichment using generic adapter P5 and P7 oligos. The DNA libraries were sequenced using NovaSeq PE150 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) and paired-end reads of 150 bp size were generated.

2.3. Construction of Molecular Marker

A full-length sequence of the common molecular marker 18S rDNA was constructed for each strain using Illumina sequencing results. Full-length 18S rDNA-based phylogenetic trees were constructed using MEGA7 [40]. Phylogenetic relationships were inferred using the maximum likelihood method. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) was shown next to the branches [41].

2.4. Construction and Annotation of cpDNAs

Illumina sequencing raw data were trimmed using a Trimmomatic-0.39 read-trimming tool with the parameters: LEADING:3 TRAILING:3 SLIDING WINDOW:4:15 MINLEN:75 [42]. Clean reads were assembled to obtain complete cpDNAs using GetOrganelle-1.7.4.1 [43]. Verification of cpDNA sequences was accomplished by aligning Illumina reads against cpDNAs using BWA-0.7.17 [44] and SAMtools-1.10 [45], which was visualized using IGV-2.7.2 [46]. Annotation was conducted with MFannot (https://github.com/BFL-lab/Mfannot (accessed on 15 December 2021)) and NCBI’s ORF Finder (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/orffinder/ (accessed on 15 January 2022)), which was further completed using NCBI’s Sequin15.10 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/Sequin/ (accessed on 15 January 2022)). For accuracy of comparative analysis, we inspected and re-annotated all cpDNAs that were downloaded from the NCBI.

2.5. Phylogenetic Analysis of cpDNAs

Amino acid sequences of 108 protein-coding genes (PCGs) from the cpDNA of each diatom species studied in this project were extracted and concatenated for phylogenetic analysis (Table 1). The amino acid sequences of the 108 genes were individually aligned using MAFFT [47]. Ambiguously aligned regions were trimmed by trimAl 1.2rev59 [48], and then concatenated using PhyloSuite [49]. The best-fit model was identified using ModelFinder [50]. A phylogenetic tree was constructed with IQ-TREE [51]. An ultrafast bootstrap approximation was conducted with 5000 replicates of the dataset [52]. Triparma laevis was used as the outgroup.

2.6. Synteny Analysis

Synteny analysis of cpDNAs was carried out using the progressiveMauve program of the Mauve v2.3.1 package [53]. Comparative illustration of cpDNAs was performed using circos-0.69 [54].

2.7. Divergence Time Estimation

Phylogenetic relationships and molecular dating were analyzed by calculating the codon evolution rate of the nucleotide sequences of the protein-coding genes (PCGs). The nucleotide sequences were aligned using MAFFT with Codon and concatenated in the software PhyloSuite [49]. A phylogenetic tree was constructed using IQ-TREE [51]. Molecular dating was conducted using the PAML package [55]. Briefly, a rough estimation of the substitution rate was performed using baseml, and estimation of divergence times with the approximate likelihood method was performed using mcmctree. The phylogenetic tree was displayed in Figtree and visualized with a 95% highest posterior density interval (HPD) for each node. The Ectocarpus siliculosus was used as the outgroup with its known fossil time. Three calibrations of the internal nodes in divergence time estimation were performed for Ectocarpus siliculosus 176–202 Mya, Fragilariopsis kerguelensis 10–36 Mya [56] and Rhizosolenia setigera 90–93 Mya [57].

3. Results

3.1. Molecular and Morphological Characterization of 11 Diatom Strains

The eleven diatom strains of the class Bacillariophyceae analyzed in this study were all isolated from Jiaozhou Bay, China (Figure 1). These strains were annotated using both morphological features and DNA sequences of the molecular marker 18S rDNA, with percentage identity (PID) > 99% to corresponding reference sequences (Figure 2A). The morphologies of two strains (CNS00113 and CNS00433) shared similarities with Nitzschia species [25]. Both were unicellular and their cells were long, straight, and ovoid (Figure 2B). The strain CNS00113 was further annotated as Nitzschia ovalis based on the similarity of its full-length 18S rDNA (MW750333) to that of Nitzschia ovalis (FR865500), with the percentage identity (PID) being 99.82% [58]. Similarly, the strain CNS00433 was annotated as Nitzschia traheaformis based on the similarity of its full-length 18S rDNA (MW750339) to that of Nitzschia traheaformis (KT943644), with the PID being 99.69% (Figure 2A) [59]. The strains CNS00381 and CNS00383 were unicellular and long with a cylindrical central part and elongated ends and their morphologies resembled Cylindrotheca closterium (Figure 2B). In spite of the similarity of their full-length 18S rDNA sequences (MW750335 and OK483377, respectively) to that of Cylindrotheca closterium (DQ019446) (99.71% and 99.77%, respectively) [60], they were annotated as Cylindrotheca spp. The strain CNS00435, whose cells were unicellular and had a slight middle constriction, was annotated as Psammodictyon constrictum (99.77% PID with AB430617) [61]. The strain CNS00409, whose cells were stick-shaped and able to connect with adjacent cells into a chain that can slide, was annotated as Bacillaria paxillifer (99.94% PID with KY320376) [62]. The cells of CNS00319, CNS00326, CNS00419, CNS00432 and CNS00413 were all spindle-like, which is a feature shared by species of the order Naviculales. In particular, the strains CNS00326, CNS00419, and CNS00432 all had a ‘sandwich-type’ valve structure (Figure 2B). The strain CNS00326 was further annotated as Navicula arenaria because its 18S rDNA sequence showed 99.76% PID with KY980304. Similarly, the strains CNS00419 and CNS00432 were all annotated as Haslea tsukamotoi (99.70% and 99.61% PID with KY937691, respectively), while the strain CNS00319 was annotated as Haslea avium (99.94% PID with KY937692) [63]. The strain CNS00413 was annotated as Pleurosigma sp. (98.31% PID with AY485514) [57].

3.2. Construction and Comparative Analysis of cpDNAs

We successfully constructed complete cpDNAs for 11 diatom strains, in which six belonged to the family Bacillariaceae, four belonged to the family Naviculaceae, and one belonged to the family Pleurosigma (Table 2). The genome sizes of 11 cpDNAs varied substantially, ranging from 119,499 bp (OK505012 Bacillaria paxillifer) to 188,592 bp (OK505009 Cylindrotheca sp.). The AT contents ranged from 68.6% (OL415007 Haslea tsukamotoi and OL415008 Haslea tsukamotoi) to 70.4% (OL415008 Pleurosigma sp.). Each cpDNA had typical four conjoined structures with one long single copy (LSC) (ranging in size from 63,955 bp in OK505012 Bacillaria paxillifer to 98,331 bp in OK505009 Cylindrotheca closterium), one short single copy (SSC) (ranging in size from 41,892 bp in OK505012 Bacillaria paxillifer to 73,153 bp in OK505011 of Psammodictyon constrictum), and two inverted repeats (IRs) of identical sizes (ranging in size from 7011 bp in OK505012 Bacillaria paxillifer to 15,462 bp in OK505010 Cylindrotheca sp.) except for KR709240 Pseudo-nitzschia multiserie which had no reported inverted repeats [64]. All 11 of these cpDNAs contained six non-coding rRNA genes (two copies of each of the three genes rns, rnl, rrn5). The number of PCGs ranged from 121 (OK505008 Pleurosigma sp.) to 137 (OK505009 Cylindrotheca sp.).
Gene loss in cpDNAs in diatom species was frequent [35]. Multiple cases of independent gene loss events were identified in the cpDNAs of the class Bacillariophyceae (Figure 3). Of the genes of the cytochrome b/f complex, only petF was found missing from the cpDNA of Nitzschia inconspicua and Astrosyne radiate; of the photosystem genes, psaE was missing from all Pseudo-nitzschia cpDNAs except from the Pseudo-nitzschia americana cpDNA and from the Fragilariopsis kerguelensis cpDNA. Similarly, the photosystem gene psaI was missing from all Pseudo-nitzschia, Fragilariopsis and Astrosyne radiata cpDNAs. Of the ribosomal protein genes, rpl21 and rpl27 were found missing from Fragilariopsis cylindrus, rpl36 and rps19 were found missing from the cpDNAs of only one species, including Pseudo-nitzschia hainanensis and Pseudo-nitzschia multiseries, respectively. Of the other genes, many genes were found missing in different species, suggesting that they were the least conserved genes in the evolution of navicular chloroplasts.

3.3. Plasticity of the Inverted Repeat Regions in Bacillariophyceae

The inverted repeat (IR) region in Bacillariophyceae varies in length by nearly five-fold, from ~7 kb in Bacillaria paxillifer to ~38 kb in Fragilariopsis kerguelensis (Figure 4). All IR regions contained a conservative gene block (rns-trnI-trnA-rnl-rrn5) except for that of Nitzschia inconspicua, which contained an extra-unidentified gene orf134 inserted into this gene cluster (rns-orf134-trnI-trnA-rnl-rrn5). In some cases, IR expansions have resulted in the duplication of a large number of genes. The IR expansion of Fragilariopsis kerguelensis resulted in the duplication of over a dozen PCGs (Figure 4).

3.4. Phylogenetic Analysis of the Bacillariophyceae

To explore the evolutionary relationships between the 11 cpDNAs newly constructed in this project and those of class Bacillariophyceae diatom species reported previously, we constructed a phylogenetic tree using the amino acid sequences of PCGs shared by these cpDNAs using a maximum likelihood method (Figure 5). The phylogenetic analysis suggested that the positioning of many species might need revision. In the order Bacillariales, the cpDNAs of Nitzschia ovalis, Nitzschia traheaformis did not cluster with cpDNAs of other species annotated in the genus Nitzschia in the phylogenetic tree. In contrast, Nitzschia inconspicua [65] and Nitzschia supralitorea [66] formed a clade that did not cluster with other Nitzschia species, suggesting that the genus Nitzschia may need to be split into multiple genera. Cylindrotheca sp. (OK505009 of the strain CNS00381) and Cylindrotheca sp. (OK505010 of the strain CNS00383) clustered with another strain annotated as Cylindrotheca closterium (KC509522) [67]. Psammodictyon constrictum was found to group closely with Nitzschia traheaformis. Bacillaria paxillifer formed an independent clade.
The five cpDNAs constructed in this study of the Naviculales included three cpDNAs (Haslea tsukamotoi OL415006, Haslea tsukamotoi OL415007, and Haslea avium OL415004) of the genus Haslea, one cpDNA (Navicula arenaria OL415005) of the genus Navicula, and one cpDNA (Pleurosigma sp. OL415008) of the genus Pleurosigma (Figure 5). Interestingly, the cpDNAs of Haslea tsukamotoi and Haslea avium were close to Navicula arenaria, rather than with the cpDNAs of Haslea silbo and Haslea nusantara in the genus Haslea, suggesting that the positioning of these Haslea species may need revisiting. A single species Pleurosigma sp. was found in the genus Pleurosigma, suggesting that additional sampling of species in many genera, including this one, is needed.

3.5. Inter- and Intra-Genus Synteny Analysis of cpDNAs

Of species in the genus Nitzschia, two cpDNAs constructed in this study, and four previously reported cpDNAs, exhibited highly diverse cpDNA genome arrangements (Figure 6A). Pair-wise analysis of the cpDNAs of Nitzschia ovalis and Nitzschia supralitorea, and Nitzschia ovalis and Nitzschia traheaformis, showed extensive differences in gene arrangements of cpDNAs (Figure 7C,D). The cpDNAs of Nitzschia inconspicua and Nitzschia supralitorea, which clustered with each other in the phylogenetic analysis of PCGs, also exhibited a high level of genome arrangements in the cpDNAs (Figure 7E).
Extensive genome rearrangements were also found between cpDNAs in Cylindrotheca. The chloroplast genomes of two Cylindrotheca sp. strains (CNS00381 and CNS00383) constructed in this study, and one reported cpDNA of Cylindrotheca closterium (DQ019446), showed high levels of genome rearrangements (Figure 6B). Gene-level analysis revealed that extensive genome rearrangements were identified in the cpDNAs of three Cylindrotheca closterium strains, two of which were identified in this project (Figure 7A,B), suggesting that these strains may actually represent unique species. Highly diverse genome arrangements were found in the cpDNAs of Psammodictyon constrictum and Nitzschia traheaformis (Figure 7F).
Of species in the genera Haslea and Navicula, three cpDNAs and one cpDNA constructed in this study, and three and one previously reported cpDNAs, exhibited highly diverse cpDNA genome arrangements, respectively (Figure 6C,D). Pair-wise analysis of cpDNAs of two newly constructed Haslea tsukamotoi cpDNAs showed conservative gene arrangements (Figure 8A). Pair-wise analysis of cpDNAs of Haslea tsukamotoi and Haslea acium, Haslea silbo and Haslea nusantara, and Haslea silbo and Haslea tsukamotoi showed extensive differences in the gene arrangements of cpDNAs (Figure 8B–D). The cpDNAs of Navicula arenaria and Navicula veneta exhibited a high level of genome arrangements in cpDNAs (Figure 8E). The cpDNAs of Navicula arenaria and Haslea avium were close in the phylogenetic analysis of PCGs but exhibited a high level of genome arrangements in cpDNAs (Figure 8F). These analyses suggested that the genome structures of cpDNAs of species in the family Naviculaceae, including the genera Haslea and Navicula, showed high levels of genome rearrangements.

3.6. Divergence Time Estimation of Bacillariophyceae Species

To explore the divergence time between diatom species in the class Bacillariophyceae, we constructed a molecular dating tree (Figure 9). The class Bacillariophyceae evolved out at 149 Mya (95% HPD: 163–134 Mya). In the order Bacillariales, Bacillaria paxillifer from the genus Bacillaria was the first to evolve out at 94 Mya (95% HPD: 103–86 Mya). The divergence between the Nitzschia traheaformis and Psammodictyon constrictum occurred at 52 Mya (95% HPD: 73–34 Mya), and Nitzschia ovalis split at 65 Mya (95% HPD: 76–53 Mya). The evolution of genus Cylindrotheca occurred at 79 Mya (95% HPD: 88–70 Mya) in which Cylindrotheca closterium appeared at 35 Mya (95% HPD: 48–24 Mya). In the order Naviculales, the emergence of the genus Pleurosigma occurred at 86 Mya (95% HPD: 93–79 Mya). The genus Haslea appeared at 80 Mya (95% HPD: 87–72 Mya), and then Haslea silbo and Haslea nusantara emerged at 26 Mya (95% HPD: 37–16 Mya), almost during the same period, the divergence between Haslea avium and Haslea tsukamotoi occurred at 24 Mya (95% HPD: 33–14 Mya). The split between Navicula arenaria and Haslea avium occurred at 32 Mya (95% HPD: 42–22 Mya).

4. Discussion

4.1. Chloroplast Genomes Are Useful Super Barcodes

Although diatoms have been estimated to comprise 200,000 species, only about 10,000 species have been described and annotated [2,68]. This estimation was based on the assumption that diatom taxonomy was “too coarse-grained”, “combining different species under the same name”, and that there are “understudied habitats” [68]. Thus, the vast majority of diatom species remain to be identified. The proper taxonomy of these diatom species remains challenging partly because different diatom species may show high morphological similarity [69,70] and high morphological plasticity [9]. The application of methods and common molecular markers have facilitated diatom taxonomy. However, most common molecular markers, including 18S rDNA, 28S rDNA, ITS, rbcL, and cox1 have limited resolution. Chloroplast genomes of the Bacillariaceae show a high level of differences (Figure 5), supporting the idea of using cpDNAs as super barcodes, consistent with the proposal of using cpDNAs as super barcodes for distinguishing different plant species [30].

4.2. Gene Loss and Plasticity of the IR Regions

The loss of important genes from cpDNAs has been previously reported in many species of Bacillariophyta [31,35], and for the cpDNAs of plant species [71]. Some psa genes are not essential for a complete and functional photosynthetic process and might be compensated for by other psa or psb genes or by a nuclear-encoded gene [72]. The gene petF transferring from cpDNAs to the nucleus was one of the mechanisms that enabled the oceanic diatom Thalassiosira oceanica to exhibit remarkable tolerance to low-iron conditions [37]. Further studies could help the determination of whether the petF of Nitzschia inconspicua [65] and Astrosyne radiate [31] cpDNAs transfers to the nuclear genome. The mechanisms that compensate for psaE and psaI loss in the genera Pseudo-nitzschia and Fragilariopsis and in Astrosyne radiata remain to be studied (Figure 3). The bas1 was lost in many species of Bacillariophyceae and the loss occurred in both red algal and chromalveolate plastid genomes [73,74,75]. The gene syfB was one of the last remaining tRNA synthetized genes in primary and secondary red plastids [35], while syfB was lost in a large number of species of Bacillariaceae. The frequent loss of ycf genes, which encodes a hypothetical protein, indicates that they were the least conservative genes in the chloroplast evolution of Bacillariaceae species.
A typical cpDNAs genome structure consists of four main segments, referred to as the small single copy region (SSC), the large single copy region (LSC), and two inverted repeat regions (IR regions) [76,77]. The contraction and expansion of the IR region was one of the factors contributing to variations in the sizes of cpDNAs and resulted in a large number of gene duplications in diatoms [31,78]. Compared to the size of the IR region, ranging from 10 to 15 kb in non-seed plants to 20–30 kb in angiosperms [72,77,79,80], the size of the IR region, from 7 to 38 kb, in Bacillariaceae species indicated they had higher plasticity (Figure 4). Most notably, although the deletion of IR regions had been previously reported in a few plants [81,82], the lack of IR regions in the published cpDNA of KR709240 Pseudo-nitzschia multiseries was likely due to assembly errors because the cpDNA of another Pseudo-nitzschia multiseries strain, and the cpDNAs of eight species of the genus Pseudo-nitzschia, all had two IR regions.

4.3. Extensive Genome Arrangements between Bacillariophyceae Species

The genus Nitzschia exhibited highly diverse cpDNA genome arrangements, which was different from many diatom genera including Thalassiosira, Chaetoceros, and Skeletonema, in which the cpDNA genome exhibited high consistency [83,84,85]. The genus Cylindrotheca consisted of a small group of marine diatoms, with a few species described, including the existence of cryptic species, such as Cylindrotheca closterium [60,86,87]. Despite the two cpDNAs of Cylindrotheca sp. constructed in this study being close to other published Cylindrotheca closterium cpDNAs and the similarity of full-length 18S rDNA sequences to that of Cylindrotheca closterium (DQ019446) [60] being 99.71% and 99.77%, respectively, the degree of variation of the cpDNA genome arrangements was quite high, which suggested that there are new species in the genus Cylindrotheca.
Bacillaria paxillifer was the first to be separated into a genus of its own, Bacillaria [88]. Bacillaria paxillifer formed an independent branch in the phylogenetic analysis (Figure 5), which supported the division. The observation of Psammodictyon constrictum clustering with Nitzschia traheaformis was consistent with a previous study [10], while there were massive gene rearrangements of cpDNAs, suggesting that the relationship between the genera Psammodictyon and Nitzschia is more complicated than the current classification. Efforts to construct more cpDNAs of Bacillariaceae species will help greatly in the optimization of the current classification.
The genus Haslea is a morphologically highly diverse group [63]. In this study, the species of the genus Haslea in the phylogenetic analysis were divided into two separate clades that exhibited highly diverse cpDNA genome arrangements in the synteny analysis, which pointed to the possibility that the genus Haslea may be non-monophyletic. Haslea tsukamotoi and Haslea avium belonged to a clade that also contained Navicula species, suggesting that these two species may belong to the genus Navicula. This observation is consistent with a previously published study proposing the transfer of Haslea tsukamotoi and Haslea avium to the genus Navicula based on morphological data and molecular marker analysis [63]. There is another independent clade containing Haslea nusantara and Haslea silbo, both sharing the interesting trait of being capable of producing blue pigments [21,89]. Efforts to construct more cpDNAs of Naviculales species will help to strengthen the current classification.

4.4. The Origin and Speciation of Bacillariophyceae Species

Fossil evidence suggests that diatoms originated in the late Jurassic period and became more common in the mid-Cretaceous period [90,91,92,93]. In the light of many diatom deposits lost as a result of diagenesis, the comparative analysis of cpDNAs could provide valuable complementary genetic insights into diatom evolution. In this study, we used diatom cpDNAs as a “super barcode” to infer the time frame within which Bacillariophyceae species originated and diversified. Our study indicated that the species of Bacillariophyceae emerged during the Cretaceous period, which is consistent with the published time-calibrated analysis using two nuclear rRNA genes (18S and 28S rRNA genes), seven plastid genes (16S rRNA, atpB, psaA, psaB, psbA, psbC and rbcL) and two mitochondrial genes (cob and cox1) [94]. During this time frame, diatoms played a dominant role in the carbon cycle when O2 levels in the atmosphere were rising [95,96]. Most Bacillariophyceae species began to appear after the end of the Cretaceous period (66 Mya) and became prosperous during the Cenozoic period. The main reasons for this were, probably, (1) the mass extinction of about 65 Mya which led to the disappearance of about 85% of species, except diatoms, and offered ecological opportunities for the emergence of new species [97], and (2) throughout the Cenozoic period, the bioavailability of silica was rising because of increased weathering of silicate rock [98] and the nutrient-rich seawater brought by the Antarctic circumpolar current [99,100].

5. Conclusions

In this study, we constructed 11 complete chloroplast genomes of Bacillariophyceae species and analyzed them in a comparative framework with other published cpDNAs of Bacillariophyceae species. We demonstrated that cpDNAs could be used as super barcodes for distinguishing Bacillariophyceae species. Furthermore, we have also shown that comparative analysis of cpDNAs may reveal critical events in evolution, including gene losses. Some PCGs losses were found in the cpDNAs in Bacillariophyceae species and the size of the IR regions showed high plasticity. The relationships between the Bacillariophyceae species, especially species in the genus Nitzschia and the genus Cylindrotheca, in which there were many genome rearrangements among the cpDNAs, were complicated. The species Cylindrotheca closterium may represent many cryptic species with nearly identical full-length 18S rDNAs, but highly divergent cpDNAs. The Bacillariophyceae species evolved out during the Cretaceous period and the diversity of species began clearly to rise after the mass extinction about 65 Mya. With the construction of more cpDNAs of Bacillariophyceae species, more insight will be gained into the biodiversity and genetic evolutionary relationships of Bacillariophyceae species.

Author Contributions

N.C. conceived of the project; Y.W., J.W., S.L., Y.C. and Y.Z. organized the strain selection, cultivation, and genome sequencing; Y.W. organized the assembly, annotation, quality control, and analyzed the data with suggestions from others; Y.W. and N.C. wrote the manuscript with inputs from others. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (42176162), the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB42000000), the Chinese Academy of Sciences Pioneer Hundred Talents Program (to Nansheng Chen), the Taishan Scholar Project Special Fund (to Nansheng Chen), the Qingdao Innovation and Creation Plan (Talent Development Program-5th Annual Pioneer and Innovator Leadership Award to Nansheng Chen, 19-3-2-16-zhc) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFC1404300).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All raw sequencing reads in this study were deposited to the National Center for Biotechnology Information under BioProject PRJNA746723. The datasets of chloroplast genome presented in this study can be found in online repositories (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 1 July 2022). The accession number(s) can be found below: OK505007, OK505008, OK505009, OK505010, OK505011, OK505012, OL415004, OL415005, OL415006, OL415007, OL415008.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to colleagues from the Jiaozhou Bay Marine Ecosystem Research Station for the opportunity to participate in the investigation expeditions and for their help with field sampling.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Smetacek, V. Biological oceanography-Diatoms and the silicate factor. Nature 1998, 391, 224–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Armbrust, E.V. The life of diatoms in the world’s oceans. Nature 2009, 459, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Falciatore, A.; Jaubert, M.; Bouly, J.P.; Bailleul, B.; Mock, T. Diatom Molecular Research Comes of Age: Model Species for Studying Phytoplankton Biology and Diversity (OPEN). Plant Cell 2020, 32, 547–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Field, C.B.; Behrenfeld, M.J.; Randerson, J.T.; Falkowski, P. Primary production of the biosphere: Integrating terrestrial and oceanic components. Science 1998, 281, 237–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Karlusich, J.J.P.; Ibarbalz, F.M.; Bowler, C. Phytoplankton in the Tara Ocean. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 2020, 12, 233–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Giordano, M.; Beardall, J.; Raven, J.A. CO2 concentrating mechanisms in algae: Mechanisms, environmental modulation, and evolution. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2005, 56, 99–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Falkowski, P.G.; Barber, R.T.; Smetacek, V. Biogeochemical controls and feedbacks on ocean primary production. Science 1998, 281, 200–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nelson, D.M.; Treguer, P.; Brzezinski, M.A.; Leynaert, A.; Queguiner, B. Production and dissolution of biogenic silica in the ocean: Revised global estimates, comparison with regional data and relationship to biogenic sedimentation. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 1995, 9, 359–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mann, D.G.; Crawford, R.M.; Round, F.E. Bacillariophyta. In Handbook of the Protists; Archibald, J.M., Simpson, A.G.B., Slamovits, C.H., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 205–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mann, D.G.; Trobajo, R.; Sato, S.; Li, C.; Witkowski, A.; Rimet, F.; Ashworth, M.P.; Hollands, R.M.; Theriot, E.C. Ripe for reassessment: A synthesis of available molecular data for the speciose diatom family Bacillariaceae. Mol. Phylogenetics Evol. 2021, 158, 106985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Abdel Hamid, M.; Refaay, D.; Abdel-Mogib, M.; Azab, Y. Studies on biomass and lipid production of seven diatom species with special emphasis on lipid composition of Nitzschia palea (Bacillariophyceae) as reliable biodiesel feedstock. Algol. Stud. 2013, 143, 65–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Touliabah, H.E.; Abdel-Hamid, M.I.; Almutairi, A.W. Long-term monitoring of the biomass and production of lipids by Nitzschia palea for biodiesel production. Saudi. J. Biol. Sci. 2020, 27, 2038–2046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Guasch, H.; Leira, M.; Montuelle, B.; Geiszinger, A.; Roulier, J.L.; Tornés, E.; Serra, A. Use of multivariate analyses to investigate the contribution of metal pollution to diatom species composition: Search for the most appropriate cases and explanatory variables. Hydrobiologia 2009, 627, 143–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rimet, F. Recent views on river pollution and diatoms. Hydrobiologia 2012, 683, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tlili, A.; Corcoll, N.; Bonet, B.; Morin, S.; Montuelle, B.; Bérard, A.; Guasch, H. In situ spatio-temporal changes in pollution-induced community tolerance to zinc in autotrophic and heterotrophic biofilm communities. Ecotoxicology 2011, 20, 1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zielinski, U.; Gersonde, R. Diatom distribution in Southern Ocean surface sediments (Atlantic sector): Implications for paleoenvironmental reconstructions. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 1997, 129, 213–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lelong, A.; Hegaret, H.; Soudant, P.; Bates, S.S. Pseudo-nitzschia (Bacillariophyceae) species, domoic acid and amnesic shellfish poisoning: Revisiting previous paradigms. Phycologia 2012, 51, 168–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Saeed, A.F.; Awan, S.A.; Ling, S.; Wang, R.; Wang, S. Domoic acid: Attributes, exposure risks, innovative detection techniques and therapeutics. Algal Res. 2017, 24, 97–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gallardo, W.G.; Buen, S.M.A. Evaluation of mucus, Navicula, and mixed diatoms as larval settlement inducers for the tropical abalone Haliotis asinina. Aquaculture 2003, 221, 357–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Alallaf, A.; Kotab, M.; Shafik, H.; Elsayed, A. In vitro efficacy of biologically active compounds derived from Navicula arenaria against soil borne phytopathogenic Macrophomina phaseolina and Fusarium oxysporum. Alfarama J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2021, 2, 285–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Prasetiya, F.S.; Gastineau, R.; Poulin, M.; Lemieux, C.; Turmel, M.; Syakti, A.D.; Hardivillier, Y.; Widowati, I.; Risjani, Y.; Iskandar, I.; et al. Haslea nusantara (Bacillariophyceae), a new blue diatom from the Java Sea, Indonesia: Morphology, biometry and molecular characterization. Plant Ecol. Evol. 2019, 152, 188–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pouvreau, J.-B.; Morançais, M.; Taran, F.; Rosa, P.; Dufossé, L.; Guérard, F.; Pin, S.; Fleurence, J.; Pondaven, P. Antioxidant and free radical scavenging properties of marennine, a blue-green polyphenolic pigment from the diatom Haslea ostrearia (Gaillon/Bory) Simonsen responsible for the natural greening of cultured oysters. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 6278–6286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gastineau, R.; Hardivillier, Y.; Leignel, V.; Tekaya, N.; Morançais, M.; Fleurence, J.; Davidovich, N.; Jacquette, B.; Gaudin, P.; Hellio, C.; et al. Greening effect on oysters and biological activities of the blue pigments produced by the diatom Haslea karadagensis (Naviculaceae). Aquaculture 2012, 368–369, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tanaka, T.; Maeda, Y.; Veluchamy, A.; Tanaka, M.; Abida, H.; Marechal, E.; Bowler, C.; Muto, M.; Sunaga, Y.; Tanaka, M.; et al. Oil Accumulation by the Oleaginous Diatom Fistulifera solaris as Revealed by the Genome and Transcriptome. Plant Cell 2015, 27, 162–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Trobajo, R.; Rovira, L.; Ector, L.; Wetzel, C.E.; Kelly, M.; Mann, D.G. Morphology and identity of some ecologically important small Nitzschia species. Diatom Res. 2013, 28, 37–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Carballeira, R.; Trobajo, R.; Leira, M.; Benito, X.; Sato, S.; Mann, D.G. A combined morphological and molecular approach to Nitzschia varelae sp. nov., with discussion of symmetry in Bacillariaceae. Eur. J. Phycol. 2017, 52, 342–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rimet, F.; Kermarrec, L.; Bouchez, A.; Hoffmann, L.; Ector, L.; Medlin, L.K. Molecular phylogeny of the family Bacillariaceae based on 18S rDNA sequences: Focus on freshwater Nitzschia of the section Lanceolatae. Diatom Res. 2011, 26, 273–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, X.; Yang, Y.; Henry, R.J.; Rossetto, M.; Wang, Y.; Chen, S. Plant DNA barcoding: From gene to genome. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos Soc. 2015, 90, 157–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fu, C.N.; Wu, C.S.; Ye, L.J.; Mo, Z.Q.; Liu, J.; Chang, Y.W.; Li, D.Z.; Chaw, S.M.; Gao, L.M. Prevalence of isomeric plastomes and effectiveness of plastome super-barcodes in yews (Taxus) worldwide. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 2773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dong, W.; Xu, C.; Wen, J.; Zhou, S. Evolutionary directions of single nucleotide substitutions and structural mutations in the chloroplast genomes of the family Calycanthaceae. BMC Evol. Biol. 2020, 20, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yu, M.; Ashworth, M.P.; Hajrah, N.H.; Khiyami, M.A.; Sabir, M.J.; Alhebshi, A.M.; Al-Malki, A.L.; Sabir, J.S.M.; Theriot, E.C.; Jansen, R.K. Evolution of the Plastid Genomes in Diatoms. In Advances in Botanical Research; Plastid Genome Evolution; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 129–155. [Google Scholar]
  32. Song, H.; Liu, F.; Li, Z.; Xu, Q.; Chen, Y.; Yu, Z.; Chen, N. Development of a high-resolution molecular marker for tracking Phaeocystis globosa genetic diversity through comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes. Harmful Algae 2020, 99, 101911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cui, L.; Leebens-Mack, J.; Wang, L.-S.; Tang, J.; Rymarquis, L.; Stern, D.B.; dePamphilis, C.W. Adaptive evolution of chloroplast genome structure inferred using a parametric bootstrap approach. BMC Evol. Biol. 2006, 6, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hamsher, S.E.; Keepers, K.G.; Pogoda, C.S.; Stepanek, J.G.; Kane, N.C.; Kociolek, J.P. Extensive chloroplast genome rearrangement amongst three closely related Halamphora spp. (Bacillariophyceae), and evidence for rapid evolution as compared to land plants. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0217824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ruck, E.C.; Nakov, T.; Jansen, R.K.; Theriot, E.C.; Alverson, A.J. Serial gene losses and foreign DNA underlie size and sequence variation in the plastid genomes of diatoms. Genome Biol. Evol. 2014, 6, 644–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Sabir, J.S.; Yu, M.; Ashworth, M.P.; Baeshen, N.A.; Baeshen, M.N.; Bahieldin, A.; Theriot, E.C.; Jansen, R.K. Conserved gene order and expanded inverted repeats characterize plastid genomes of Thalassiosirales. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e107854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lommer, M.; Roy, A.S.; Schilhabel, M.; Schreiber, S.; Rosenstiel, P.; LaRoche, J. Recent transfer of an iron-regulated gene from the plastid to the nuclear genome in an oceanic diatom adapted to chronic iron limitation. BMC Genom. 2010, 11, 718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Brembu, T.; Winge, P.; Tooming-Klunderud, A.; Nederbragt, A.J.; Jakobsen, K.S.; Bones, A.M. The chloroplast genome of the diatom Seminavis robusta: New features introduced through multiple mechanisms of horizontal gene transfer. Mar. Genom. 2014, 16, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wang, J.; Liu, F.; Chen, N. Mitochondrial genome of the harmful algal bloom species Odontella regia (Mediophyceae, Bacillariophyta). J. Appl. Phycol. 2021, 33, 855–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Felsenstein, J. Confidence-limits on phylogenies-an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985, 39, 783–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bolger, A.M.; Lohse, M.; Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2114–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Jin, J.-J.; Yu, W.-B.; Yang, J.-B.; Song, Y.; dePamphilis, C.W.; Yi, T.-S.; Li, D.-Z. GetOrganelle: A fast and versatile toolkit for accurate de novo assembly of organelle genomes. Genome Biol. 2020, 21, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, H.; Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1754–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Li, H.; Handsaker, B.; Wysoker, A.; Fennell, T.; Ruan, J.; Homer, N.; Marth, G.; Abecasis, G.; Durbin, R.; 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 2078–2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Thorvaldsdottir, H.; Robinson, J.T.; Mesirov, J.P. Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV): High-performance genomics data visualization and exploration. Brief. Bioinform. 2013, 14, 178–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Katoh, K.; Standley, D.M. MAFFT Multiple Sequence Alignment Software Version 7: Improvements in Performance and Usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 772–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Capella-Gutierrez, S.; Silla-Martinez, J.M.; Gabaldon, T. trimAl: A tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1972–1973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhang, D.; Gao, F.; Jakovlic, I.; Zou, H.; Zhang, J.; Li, W.X.; Wang, G.T. PhyloSuite: An integrated and scalable desktop platform for streamlined molecular sequence data management and evolutionary phylogenetics studies. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2020, 20, 348–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kalyaanamoorthy, S.; Bui Quang, M.; Wong, T.K.F.; von Haeseler, A.; Jermiin, L.S. ModelFinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat. Methods 2017, 14, 587–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Trifinopoulos, J.; Lam-Tung, N.; von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q. W-IQ-TREE: A fast online phylogenetic tool for maximum likelihood analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, W232–W235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Minh, B.Q.; Nguyen, M.A.T.; von Haeseler, A. Ultrafast Approximation for Phylogenetic Bootstrap. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 1188–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Darling, A.E.; Mau, B.; Perna, N.T. progressiveMauve: Multiple Genome Alignment with Gene Gain, Loss and Rearrangement. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e11147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Krzywinski, M.; Schein, J.; Birol, I.; Connors, J.; Gascoyne, R.; Horsman, D.; Jones, S.J.; Marra, M.A. Circos: An information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 2009, 19, 1639–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yang, Z. PAML 4: Phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2007, 24, 1586–1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Matari, N.H.; Blair, J.E. A multilocus timescale for oomycete evolution estimated under three distinct molecular clock models. BMC Evol. Biol. 2014, 14, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Damste, J.S.S.; Muyzer, G.; Abbas, B.; Rampen, S.W.; Masse, G.; Allard, W.G.; Belt, S.T.; Robert, J.M.; Rowland, S.J.; Moldowan, J.M.; et al. The rise of the rhizosolenid diatoms. Science 2004, 304, 584–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Gachon, C.M.M.; Heesch, S.; Küpper, F.C.; Achilles-Day, U.E.M.; Brennan, D.; Campbell, C.N.; Clarke, A.; Dorrell, R.G.; Field, J.; Gontarek, S.; et al. The CCAP KnowledgeBase: Linking protistan and cyanobacterial biological resources with taxonomic and molecular data. Syst. Biodivers. 2013, 11, 407–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Witkowski, A.; Li, C.; Zglobicka, I.; Yu, S.-X.; Ashworth, M.; Bek, P.D.; Qin, S.; Tang, C.; Krzywda, M.; Ruppel, M.; et al. Multigene Assessment of Biodiversity of Diatom (Bacillariophyceae) Assemblages from the Littoral Zone of the Bohai and Yellow Seas in Yantai Region of Northeast China with some Remarks on Ubiquitous Taxa. J. Coast. Res. 2016, 74, 166–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Li, H.; Yang, G.; Sun, Y.; Wu, S.; Zhang, X. Cylindrotheca closterium is a species complex as was evidenced by the variations of rbcL gene and SSU rDNA. J. Ocean. Univ. China 2007, 6, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Medlin, L.K.; Desdevises, Y. Phylogeny of ‘ARAPHID’ diatoms inferred from SSU & LSU rDNA, RBCL & PSBA sequences. Vie Et Milieu-Life Environ. 2016, 66, 129–154. [Google Scholar]
  62. An, S.M.; Choi, D.H.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, H.; Noh, J.H. Identification of benthic diatoms isolated from the eastern tidal flats of the Yellow Sea: Comparison between morphological and molecular approaches. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0179422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Li, Y.; Chen, X.; Sun, Z.; Xu, K. Taxonomy and molecular phylogeny of three marine benthic species of Haslea (Bacillariophyceae), with transfer of two species to Navicula. Diatom Res. 2017, 32, 451–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Cao, M.; Yuan, X.-L.; Bi, G. Complete sequence and analysis of plastid genomes of Pseudo-nitzschia multiseries (Bacillariophyta). Mitochondrial DNA Part A 2016, 27, 2897–2898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Oliver, A.; Podell, S.; Pinowska, A.; Traller, J.C.; Smith, S.R.; McClure, R.; Beliaev, A.; Bohutskyi, P.; Hill, E.A.; Rabines, A.; et al. Diploid genomic architecture of Nitzschia inconspicua, an elite biomass production diatom. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 15592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Gastineau, R.; Hamedi, C.; Baba Hamed, M.B.; Abi-Ayad, S.-M.E.-A.; Bąk, M.; Lemieux, C.; Turmel, M.; Dobosz, S.; Wróbel, R.J.; Kierzek, A.; et al. Morphological and molecular identification reveals that waters from an isolated oasis in Tamanrasset (extreme South of Algerian Sahara) are colonized by opportunistic and pollution-tolerant diatom species. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 121, 107104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Guillory, W.X.; Onyshchenko, A.; Ruck, E.C.; Parks, M.; Nakov, T.; Wickett, N.J.; Alverson, A.J. Recurrent Loss, Horizontal Transfer, and the Obscure Origins of Mitochondrial Introns in Diatoms (Bacillariophyta). Genome Biol. Evol. 2018, 10, 1504–1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Mann, D.G.; Vanormelingen, P. An inordinate fondness? The number, distributions, and origins of diatom species. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 2013, 60, 414–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Amato, A.; Kooistra, W.H.C.F.; Ghiron, J.H.L.; Mann, D.G.; Proschold, T.; Montresor, M. Reproductive isolation among sympatric cryptic species in marine diatoms. Protist 2007, 158, 193–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Sarno, D.; Kooistra, W.; Medlin, L.K.; Percopo, I.; Zingone, A. Diversity in the genus Skeletonema (Bacillariophyceae). II. An assessment of the taxonomy of S-costatum-like species with the description of four new species. J. Phycol. 2005, 41, 151–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Xiong, A.S.; Peng, R.H.; Zhuang, J.; Gao, F.; Zhu, B.; Fu, X.Y.; Xue, Y.; Jin, X.F.; Tian, Y.S.; Zhao, W.; et al. Gene duplication, transfer, and evolution in the chloroplast genome. Biotechnol. Adv. 2009, 27, 340–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Mohanta, T.K.; Mishra, A.K.; Khan, A.; Hashem, A.; Abd Allah, E.F.; Al-Harrasi, A. Gene Loss and Evolution of the Plastome. Genes 2020, 11, 1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Douglas, S.E.; Penny, S.L. The plastid genome of the cryptophyte alga, Guillardia theta: Complete sequence and conserved synteny groups confirm its common ancestry with red algae. J. Mol. Evol. 1999, 48, 236–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Glockner, G.; Rosenthal, A.; Valentin, K. The structure and gene repertoire of an ancient red algal plastid genome. J. Mol. Evol. 2000, 51, 382–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Puerta, M.V.S.; Bachvaroff, T.R.; Delwiche, C.F. The complete plastid genome sequence of the haptophyte Emiliania huxleyi: A comparison to other plastid genomes. DNA Res. 2005, 12, 151–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Bendich, A.J. Circular chloroplast chromosomes: The grand illusion. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 1661–1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Kolodner, R.; Tewari, K.K. Inverted repeats in chloroplast DNA from higher plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1979, 76, 41–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zhu, A.; Guo, W.; Gupta, S.; Fan, W.; Mower, J.P. Evolutionary dynamics of the plastid inverted repeat: The effects of expansion, contraction, and loss on substitution rates. New Phytol. 2016, 209, 1747–1756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Wu, C.-S.; Lai, Y.-T.; Lin, C.-P.; Wang, Y.-N.; Chaw, S.-M. Evolution of reduced and compact chloroplast genomes (cpDNAs) in gnetophytes: Selection toward a lower-cost strategy. Mol. Phylogenetics Evol. 2009, 52, 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Wolf, P.G.; Der, J.P.; Duffy, A.M.; Davidson, J.B.; Grusz, A.L.; Pryer, K.M. The evolution of chloroplast genes and genomes in ferns. Plant Mol. Biol. 2011, 76, 251–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Strauss, S.H.; Palmer, J.D.; Howe, G.T.; Doerksen, A.H. Chloroplast genomes of two conifers lack a large inverted repeat and are extensively rearranged. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1988, 85, 3898–3902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Wolfe, K.H. The site of deletion of the inverted repeat in pea chloroplast DNA contains duplicated gene fragments. Curr. Genet. 1988, 13, 97–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Liu, S.; Xu, Q.; Liu, K.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, N. Chloroplast Genomes for Five Skeletonema Species: Comparative and Phylogenetic Analysis. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 2962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Liu, K.; Chen, Y.; Cui, Z.; Liu, S.; Xu, Q.; Chen, N. Comparative Analysis of Chloroplast Genomes of Thalassiosira Species. Front. Mar. Sci. 2021, 8, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Xu, Q.; Cui, Z.; Chen, N. Comparative Analysis of Chloroplast Genomes of Seven Chaetoceros Species Revealed Variation Hotspots and Speciation Time. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 742554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Vanormelingen, P.; Vanelslander, B.; Sato, S.; Gillard, J.; Trobajo, R.; Sabbe, K.; Vyverman, W. Heterothallic sexual reproduction in the model diatom Cylindrotheca. Eur. J. Phycol. 2013, 48, 93–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Stock, W.; Vanelslander, B.; Rudiger, F.; Sabbe, K.; Vyverman, W.; Karsten, U. Thermal Niche Differentiation in the Benthic Diatom Cylindrotheca closterium (Bacillariophyceae) Complex. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Gmelin, J.F. Caroli a Linn´e Systema Naturae Per Regna Tria Naturae, Secundum Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species, Cum Characteribus, Differentiis, Synonymis, Locis, 13th ed.; Vermes Infusoria; Georg Emanuel Beer: Leipzig, Gremany, 1788; Volume 1, pp. 3021–3909. [Google Scholar]
  89. Gastineau, R.; Hansen, G.; Poulin, M.; Lemieux, C.; Turmel, M.; Bardeau, J.F.; Leignel, V.; Hardivillier, Y.; Morancais, M.; Fleurence, J.; et al. Haslea silbo, A Novel Cosmopolitan Species of Blue Diatoms. Biology 2021, 10, 328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Round, F.E.; Crawford, R.M.; Mann, D.G. The Diatoms: Biology and Morphology of the Genera; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  91. Sims, P.A.; Mann, D.G.; Medlin, L.K. Evolution of the diatoms: Insights from fossil, biological and molecular data. Phycologia 2006, 45, 361–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Lewitus, E.; Bittner, L.; Malviya, S.; Bowler, C.; Morlon, H. Clade-specific diversification dynamics of marine diatoms since the Jurassic. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2018, 2, 1715–1723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Nakov, T.; Beaulieu, J.M.; Alverson, A.J. Insights into global planktonic diatom diversity: The importance of comparisons between phylogenetically equivalent units that account for time. ISME J. 2018, 12, 2807–2810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Nakov, T.; Beaulieu, J.M.; Alverson, A.J. Accelerated diversification is related to life history and locomotion in a hyperdiverse lineage of microbial eukaryotes (Diatoms, Bacillariophyta). New Phytol. 2018, 219, 462–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Falkowski, P.G.; Katz, M.E.; Milligan, A.J.; Fennel, K.; Cramer, B.S.; Aubry, M.P.; Berner, R.A.; Novacek, M.J.; Zapol, W.M. The rise of oxygen over the past 205 million years and the evolution of large placental mammals. Science 2005, 309, 2202–2204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Armbrust, E.V.; Berges, J.A.; Bowler, C.; Green, B.R.; Martinez, D.; Putnam, N.H.; Zhou, S.G.; Allen, A.E.; Apt, K.E.; Bechner, M.; et al. The genome of the diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana: Ecology, evolution, and metabolism. Science 2004, 306, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Falkowski, P.G.; Katz, M.E.; Knoll, A.H.; Quigg, A.; Raven, J.A.; Schofield, O.; Taylor, F.J.R. The evolution of modern eukaryotic phytoplankton. Science 2004, 305, 354–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Cermeno, P.; Falkowski, P.G.; Romero, O.E.; Schaller, M.F.; Vallina, S.M. Continental erosion and the Cenozoic rise of marine diatoms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 4239–4244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Barker, P.F. Scotia Sea regional tectonic evolution: Implications for mantle flow and palaeocirculation. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2001, 55, 1–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Scher, H.D.; Martin, E.E. Timing and climatic consequences of the opening of Drake Passage. Science 2006, 312, 428–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijerph 19 10024 g001 550
Figure 1. Sampling sites of 11 diatom species in Jiaozhou Bay.
Figure 1. Sampling sites of 11 diatom species in Jiaozhou Bay.
Ijerph 19 10024 g001
Ijerph 19 10024 g002 550
Figure 2. Morphological and molecular analysis of diatom species analyzed in this study. (A) Phylogenetic analysis based on 18S ribosomal DNA (18S rDNA) gene. Numbers at the branches represent bootstrap values. Branch lengths are proportional to the genetic distances, which are indicated by the scale bar. (B) Representative micrographs of 11 diatom species studied in this project. Bar = 10 μm.
Figure 2. Morphological and molecular analysis of diatom species analyzed in this study. (A) Phylogenetic analysis based on 18S ribosomal DNA (18S rDNA) gene. Numbers at the branches represent bootstrap values. Branch lengths are proportional to the genetic distances, which are indicated by the scale bar. (B) Representative micrographs of 11 diatom species studied in this project. Bar = 10 μm.
Ijerph 19 10024 g002
Ijerph 19 10024 g003 550
Figure 3. Gene losses in diatom cpDNAs. The matrix shows the presence (empty) and absence (blue) of 27 genes among the cpDNAs of Bacillariophyceae.
Figure 3. Gene losses in diatom cpDNAs. The matrix shows the presence (empty) and absence (blue) of 27 genes among the cpDNAs of Bacillariophyceae.
Ijerph 19 10024 g003
Ijerph 19 10024 g004 550
Figure 4. Size variations of the inverted repeated region across cpDNAs of Bacillariophyceae. Colored boxes circumscribe genes in various functional categories, with those above the line transcribed on the forward strand and vice versa for genes below the line.
Figure 4. Size variations of the inverted repeated region across cpDNAs of Bacillariophyceae. Colored boxes circumscribe genes in various functional categories, with those above the line transcribed on the forward strand and vice versa for genes below the line.
Ijerph 19 10024 g004
Ijerph 19 10024 g005 550
Figure 5. Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree of Bacillariophyceae species based on concatenated amino acid sequences encoded by 108 shared protein-coding genes. Numbers on the left- and right-side at the branches represent bootstrap values. Branch lengths were proportional to the amount of sequence change, which are indicated by the scale bar below the trees.
Figure 5. Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree of Bacillariophyceae species based on concatenated amino acid sequences encoded by 108 shared protein-coding genes. Numbers on the left- and right-side at the branches represent bootstrap values. Branch lengths were proportional to the amount of sequence change, which are indicated by the scale bar below the trees.
Ijerph 19 10024 g005
Ijerph 19 10024 g006 550
Figure 6. Synteny analysis of cpDNAs. (A) Synteny analysis of Nitzschia cpDNAs (B) Synteny analysis of Cylindrotheca cpDNAs. (C) Synteny analysis of Haslea cpDNAs. (D) Synteny analysis of Navicula cpDNAs. Each colored block indicates a synteny block among different cpDNAs.
Figure 6. Synteny analysis of cpDNAs. (A) Synteny analysis of Nitzschia cpDNAs (B) Synteny analysis of Cylindrotheca cpDNAs. (C) Synteny analysis of Haslea cpDNAs. (D) Synteny analysis of Navicula cpDNAs. Each colored block indicates a synteny block among different cpDNAs.
Ijerph 19 10024 g006
Ijerph 19 10024 g007 550
Figure 7. Pair-wise comparison of representative Bacillariales cpDNAs. (A) The comparative analysis of Cylindrotheca sp. OK505009 and Cylindrotheca sp. OK505010 cpDNAs. (B) The comparative analysis of Cylindrotheca closterium KC509522 and Cylindrotheca sp. OK505010 cpDNAs. (C) The comparative analysis of Nitzschia ovalis OK505007 and Nitzschia supralitorea MT383638 cpDNAs. (D) The comparative analysis of Nitzschia ovalis OK505007 and Nitzschia traheaformis OK505008 cpDNAs. (E) The comparative analysis of Nitzschia inconspicu MW971520 and Nitzschia supralitorea MT383638 cpDNAs. (F) The comparative analysis of Psammodictyon constrictum OK505011 and Nitzschia traheaformis OK505008 cpDNAs. The assignment of genes into different functional groups is indicated by colors.
Figure 7. Pair-wise comparison of representative Bacillariales cpDNAs. (A) The comparative analysis of Cylindrotheca sp. OK505009 and Cylindrotheca sp. OK505010 cpDNAs. (B) The comparative analysis of Cylindrotheca closterium KC509522 and Cylindrotheca sp. OK505010 cpDNAs. (C) The comparative analysis of Nitzschia ovalis OK505007 and Nitzschia supralitorea MT383638 cpDNAs. (D) The comparative analysis of Nitzschia ovalis OK505007 and Nitzschia traheaformis OK505008 cpDNAs. (E) The comparative analysis of Nitzschia inconspicu MW971520 and Nitzschia supralitorea MT383638 cpDNAs. (F) The comparative analysis of Psammodictyon constrictum OK505011 and Nitzschia traheaformis OK505008 cpDNAs. The assignment of genes into different functional groups is indicated by colors.
Ijerph 19 10024 g007
Ijerph 19 10024 g008 550
Figure 8. Pair-wise comparison of representative Naviculales cpDNAs. (A) The comparative analysis of Haslea tsukamotoi OK415006 and Haslea tsukamotoi OK415007 cpDNAs. (B) The comparative analysis of Haslea avium OK415004 and Haslea tsukamotoi OK415007 cpDNAs. (C) The comparative analysis of Haslea silbo MW646082 and Haslea nusantara MH681881 cpDNAs. (D) The comparative analysis of Haslea silbo MW646082 and Haslea tsukamotoi OK415007 cpDNAs. (E) The comparative analysis of Navicula arenaria OK415005 and Navicula veneta MT383645cpDNAs. (F) The comparative analysis of Navicula arenaria OK415005 and Haslea avium OK415004 cpDNAs. The assignment of genes into different functional groups is indicated by colors.
Figure 8. Pair-wise comparison of representative Naviculales cpDNAs. (A) The comparative analysis of Haslea tsukamotoi OK415006 and Haslea tsukamotoi OK415007 cpDNAs. (B) The comparative analysis of Haslea avium OK415004 and Haslea tsukamotoi OK415007 cpDNAs. (C) The comparative analysis of Haslea silbo MW646082 and Haslea nusantara MH681881 cpDNAs. (D) The comparative analysis of Haslea silbo MW646082 and Haslea tsukamotoi OK415007 cpDNAs. (E) The comparative analysis of Navicula arenaria OK415005 and Navicula veneta MT383645cpDNAs. (F) The comparative analysis of Navicula arenaria OK415005 and Haslea avium OK415004 cpDNAs. The assignment of genes into different functional groups is indicated by colors.
Ijerph 19 10024 g008
Ijerph 19 10024 g009 550
Figure 9. Time-calibrated phylogeny of cpDNAs of Bacillariophyceae species. The red dots represent calibration point and the 95% highest posterior density interval for node ages are shown with translucent blue bars.
Figure 9. Time-calibrated phylogeny of cpDNAs of Bacillariophyceae species. The red dots represent calibration point and the 95% highest posterior density interval for node ages are shown with translucent blue bars.
Ijerph 19 10024 g009
Table
Table 1. 108 shared protein-coding genes of cpDNAs in Bacillariophyceae.
Table 1. 108 shared protein-coding genes of cpDNAs in Bacillariophyceae.
CategoryGenes
Photosystem IpsaA, psaB, psaC, psaD, psaF, psaM, psaJ, psaL
Photosystem IIpsbB, psbC, psbD, psbE, psbF, psbH, psbI, psbJ, psbK, psbL, psbN, psbT, psbV, psbX, psbY, psbZ
Cytochrome b/f complexpetA, petB, petD, petG, petL, petM, petN
ATP synthaseatpA, atpB, atpD, atpE, atpF, atpG, atpH, atpI
RubisCO subunitrbcL, rbcS
RNA polymeraserpoA, rpoB, rpoC1, rpoC2
Ribosomal proteins (SSU)rps2, rps3, rps4, rps5, rps7, rps8, rps9, rps10, rps11, rps12, rps13, rps14, rps16, rps17, rps18, rps20
Ribosomal proteins (LSU)rpl1, rpl2, rpl3, rpl4, rpl5, rpl6, rpl11, rpl12, rpl13, rpl14, rpl16, rpl18, rpl20, rpl23, rpl24, rpl29, rpl31, rpl32, rpl33, rpl34, rpl35
Other genescbbX, ccs1, ccsA, chlI, clpC, dnaB, dnaK, ftsH, groEL, lysR, secA, secG, secY, sufB, sufC, tatC, tufA, thiG, thiS, ycf3, ycf4, ycf12, ycf39, ycf41, ycf46, ycf66
Table
Table 2. Genome features of 11 cpDNAs constructed in this study.
Table 2. Genome features of 11 cpDNAs constructed in this study.
FamilySpeciesAccession NumberSize (bp)LSC Length (bp)SSC Length (bp)IR Length (bp)AT ContentCore Genes
PCGs/rRNAs
BacillariaceaeNitzschia ovalisOK505007140,70367,86245,74113,76068.7%127/6
BacillariaceaeNitzschia traheaformisOK505008166,82273,10168,91912,61169.4%129/6
BacillariaceaeCylindrotheca sp.OK505009188,59298,33161,47914,60170.0%137/6
BacillariaceaeCylindrotheca sp.OK505010178,34981,38966,45615,46269.9%134/6
BacillariaceaeBacillaria paxilliferOK505012119,44963,95541,892701170.0%129/6
BacillariaceaePsammodictyon constrictumOK505011186,01590,74073,15311,27169.2%127/6
NaviculaceaeHaslea tsukamotoiOL415006136,78470,89449,194834868.6%127/6
NaviculaceaeHaslea tsukamotoiOL415007136,74670,01250,048834368.6%128/6
NaviculaceaeHaslea aviumOL415004137,69170,27349,194911268.7%128/6
NaviculaceaeNavicula arenariaOL415005147,33180,13447,699974969.3%127/6
PleurosigmaPleurosigma sp.OL415008174,38296,63860,400867270.4%121/6
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; Chen, Y.; Liu, S.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, N. Comparative Analysis of Bacillariophyceae Chloroplast Genomes Uncovers Extensive Genome Rearrangements Associated with Speciation. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 10024. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610024

AMA Style

Wang Y, Wang J, Chen Y, Liu S, Zhao Y, Chen N. Comparative Analysis of Bacillariophyceae Chloroplast Genomes Uncovers Extensive Genome Rearrangements Associated with Speciation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(16):10024. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610024

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Yichao, Jing Wang, Yang Chen, Shuya Liu, Yongfang Zhao, and Nansheng Chen. 2022. "Comparative Analysis of Bacillariophyceae Chloroplast Genomes Uncovers Extensive Genome Rearrangements Associated with Speciation" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 16: 10024. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610024

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop