Next Article in Journal
Impacts of Antibiotic Residues in the Environment on Bacterial Resistance and Human Health in Eastern China: An Interdisciplinary Mixed-Methods Study Protocol
Previous Article in Journal
The Influence of Selected Food Safety Practices of Consumers on Food Waste Due to Its Spoilage
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Municipal Solid Waste on Planting Properties and Scouring Resistance of Vegetation Concrete (Wuhan, China)

1
Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430070, China
2
China Academy of Building Research Institute, Beijing 100029, China
3
Beijing Glory PKPM Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100013, China
4
Department of Engineering Management, Huaiyin Institute of Technology, Huaian 223003, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(13), 8143; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19138143
Submission received: 18 April 2022 / Revised: 30 June 2022 / Accepted: 30 June 2022 / Published: 2 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Science and Engineering)

Abstract

:
Vegetation concrete (VC) laid as a reinforcement base and covered by a soil layer with vegetation has been increasingly used to beautify the landscape, reduce environmental pollution and control stormwater runoff. In this study, the effects of municipal solid waste (MSW) on vegetation characteristics of modified VC were tested under different mix compositions. We first explored the effects of the mixed concrete environment on Festuca elata and perennial Ryegrass for 60 days. Then, the influence of various MSW contents added to different percentages of cement on scouring resistance of VC was examined. The experimental results revealed that the germination rates and plant heights of both species decreased with the increase in concrete content. Considering the scouring resistances, the optimal mix proportion of MSW-modified VC was recommended as No. 25, with 5% KW fertilizer, 8% cement and 0.5% wheat straw in this study. Furthermore, adding a small amount of fallen leaves or silica fume to VC can promote the growth of both species to some extent, although these additions had an inverse effect on the scouring resistances. The results contribute to beneficial knowledge for future research on the feasibility of the use these species with VC technology for slope ecological restoration.

1. Introduction

In the field of slope disaster management and ecological protection, a number of measures have been taken, and new techniques have been developed [1]. One of the fastest and most environmentally friendly techniques to avoid and remedy runoff on a slope is to vegetate it [2]. Research has shown that the natural soil lacks scouring resistance and therefore cannot be directly used as overlaying soil for plants [3]. Researchers (e.g., [4], Cao, Wang [5,6]) have used cement (Portland cement (PC) and sulfoaluminate cement (SAP)) as solidified agents to improve the scouring resistance of plants because its hydration and hardening can produce a mechanically stable form. For integration of vegetation with concrete, porous concrete is used as the medium so that water, air, soil and roots can pass freely and vegetation can germinate and root itself through the porous concrete frame and into the underlying soil stratum [7]. Vegetation concrete (VC) laid as a reinforcement base and covered by a soil layer with vegetation has been increasingly used to beautify the landscape, reduce environmental pollution and control stormwater runoff [7,8]. It is crucial to understand the effects of different concrete contents on seed germination and seedling establishment so that the appropriate concrete content range in for application of VC can be determined [9]. Chen et al. [9] evaluated the impacts of concrete content on seed germination and seedling establishment and found that the optimum ratio of concrete content as a stabilizing agent was 8%. However, plant roots require adequate moisture and nutrients to grow and extend, which cannot be satisfied by VC. In addition, due to the weakly alkaline environment of VC, plants cannot grow properly on it, as the most suitable soil for plant growth is slightly acidic. Thus, many researchers began to use low-basicity cement or to add admixtures such as fly ash and slag to reduce the alkalinity of vegetation concrete. Yan et al. [10] examined the influence of anhydrite on mechanical the properties and alkalinity of sulfoaluminate cement clinker. Martin et al. [11] investigated the properties of calcium sulfoaluminate (CSA) cements blended with limestone. Other researchers have added fertilizers or soil amendment into VC to provide nutrition for plant growth. For instance, Yuan et al. [12] studied a new and improved multi-aggregate ecological concrete (IMAEC) revetment treatment by adding activated carbon and other materials to the VC, which resulted in higher water purification performance than traditional ecological concrete (TEC) revetment treatment. Gong et al. [13] investigated the effects of carbamide as a fertilizer added to planting concrete on properties of cement and evaluated the adaptability of sulfoaluminate cement (SAC) concrete for plant growth.
However, the development of VC composite is still in its infancy, and there is little available published literature for direct review [7]. Therefore, there is a practical necessity to propose a novel, cost-effective and eco-friendly VC modification approach that retains adequate scouring resistance. Owing to growing environmental concerns, the establishment of sustainable materials and practices is important for future societies [14,15]. Municipal solid waste (MSW), i.e., kitchen waste (KW), wheat straw, fly ash, silica fume and fallen leaves, provides an alternative for VC modification. Current research shows that the organic content (such as kitchen and garden waste) of MSW can be used as a soil amending agent to help increase plant growth and improve plant health [16]. A total of 1300 million tons/year (Mt/year) of MSW is generated at a rate of 1.2 kg/capita/day [17], and this considerable quantity of MSW is anticipated to rise to 2200 Mt/year by 2025 [18], representing the most abundant type of waste in China [19]. Harmless MSW disposal methods need to be developed to satisfy the economic development situation [20]. Thus, the addition of MSW to VC is not only prominent in improving soil properties as a soil conditioner but also economical and practical in terms of environmental impact and cost.
MSW is the largest structural element of a municipal landfill [21] and has direct influence on the stability of sanitary landfills and the integrity of lining systems [22]. Thus, considerable attention has been paid to the engineering properties of MSW. Related studies have mainly focused on the effects of factors such as waste type, composition, decomposition, moisture conditions, test methods, unit weight, and particle size and shape on the comparative or shear strength behaviors of MSW [21,23,24,25,26,27,28]. For example, Liu et al. [29] combined fly ash, ferrous sulfate and vermiculite vinyl acetate emulsion to enhance the physical and chemical characteristics of vegetation substrate. Cheng et al. [30] added fly ash and silica fume to VC as admixture and supplementary cementing materials, and results showed that the effects of silica fume on strength, porosity and pH value were greater than those of fly ash. Hu et al. [31] combined palm fiber, silicon fume and entraining agent as admixture to increase the frost resistance of VC with a mass loss rate of 2.81% and relative elastic modulus of 84.27%. Limited studies have been reported on the vegetation performance of MSW (such as fly ash, silica fume, etc.)-modified VC. For instance, Zhao et al. [8] examined the effects of fly ash slag and superplasticizer on VC, and experimental results showed that Chloris truncata was better adapted to the VC environment than Elymus scaber and Themeda trianda, although Elymus scaber thrived with a remarkable coverage with high fly ash content and Themeda trianda preferred a lower fly ash content. Bao et al. [32] used self-made reducing cement and alkaline admixture with silica fume as the main component; the effect of this admixture on vegetation growth was investigated in a small-scale field for ten weeks. Kim and Park [33] investigated the void ratio, compressive strength, freeze–thaw resistance, plant growth and water purification properties of porous VC formed using the industrial byproducts blast furnace slag powder and blast furnace slag aggregates. However, most work has mainly focused on the effect of one parameter, such as fly ash or silica fume, on the performance of VC, although it is affected by a large number of parameters [34]. Moreover, the combined effects of multiple parameters on the performance of VC remain less known.
The aim of the study presented in this paper was to propose a cost-effective and eco-friendly VC modification approach, retaining adequate scouring resistance. Therefore, extensive experiments were conducted on the addition of MSW to the ecological base material of VC. Comparative experiments were designed and tested under different mix compositions by controlling other environmental factors and varying MSW contents with different treatments. Then, based on the experimental results, the effects of the mixed concrete environment on the selected grass species were explored. We first investigated the growth characteristics (i.e., average seed germination and grass height) of two plants (Festuca elata and perennial Ryegrass) on VC; a total of 30 mix designs containing different percentages of kitchen waste, wheat straw, fly ash, silica fume and fallen leaves, along with different amounts of Portland cement, were prepared and used to produce VC specimens. We them performed a detailed factor analysis of effects of the addition contents on seed germination and growth properties. Furthermore, the influence of various addition contents with different percentages of cement (4%, 8% and 12%) on scouring resistance of VC was examined. Finally, conclusions were drawn.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Raw Materials and Mixture Proportions

2.1.1. Soil

The soil used for this study was collected from Nanwang mountain slope (below the surface layer to about 20 cm) at China University of Geosciences (CUG, Wuhan, China) (Figure 1) and classified as clay according to the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). The soil was screened to an aggregate gradation of 2.5 mm. The physical performance indices of the soil after drying are listed in Table 1. As shown in Table 1, the relative density of the soil was 2.5, and its plastic limit and liquid limit were 17.6% and 32.3%, respectively. According to the standard Proctor compaction test, the soil had a maximum dry density (MDD) of 1.73 g/cm3, which corresponds to the optimum moisture content (OMC) of 15.6%.

2.1.2. Compound Portland Cement

The compound Portland cement used in this study was produced in Tangshan, China, and had a strength of 32.5 Mpa after an initial setting time of 2 h and final setting time of 6.5 h. According to the experimental results reported in [9], the optimum ratio of concrete content for seed germination and seedling establishment was 8%. Thus, three different percentages of cement were selected: 4%, 8% and 12%.

2.1.3. Admixtures

(1)
Organic fertilizer made of kitchen waste (KW)
The household KW fertilizer used in this research consisted of vegetables, peel, fish viscera, rice, lard, etc., with high water content, a low C/N ratio and low porosity. As research showed that KW fertilizer can be used to increase acidic soil pH and increase soil carbon content [20], and the suitable soils for the growth of the two selected grass species are slightly acidic, we considered the ratio of KW to be less than 15%.
(2)
Silica fume
The silica fume used in this study was produced in Henan, China. According to [35], the optimum addition percentage of silica fume to significantly improve the compressive strength of concrete is 5%. Silica fume with weight percentages of 4%, 6%, and 8% were employed in the concrete mix design.
(3)
Fly ash
The fly ash used in this study was produced by Shandong Hengyuan New Material Co., Ltd. and usually used as a supplementary cementing material to reduce the amount of cement, and weight percentages of 10%, 20% and 30% were employed in the concrete mix design.
(4)
Wheat straw
The waste of wheat straw contains high amounts of silica, especially in the leaves [36]. The weight percentages of wheat straw were designated as less than 1.5% in the concrete mix design. The wheat straw used in this study was produced in Henan, China. Before sample preparation, the epidermis of the wheat straw was stripped, and the stem nodes were cut off with the required reinforcement length of 2 cm.
(5)
Fallen leaves
According to [37], more than 30 million tons of green waste are produced every year in China, with fallen leaves and tree pruning waste representing dominant forms. Another study showed that bulked aerobic composting with fallen leaves has potential for kitchen waste disposal [19], then fallen leaves and KW fertilizer may have combined effects on the vegetation performance of VC. Therefore, we selected fallen leaves as soil amendments with the same comparable content ratio as that of wheat straw (≤1.5%).

2.1.4. Plants Seeds

Two common plants (i.e., Festuca elata and perennial Ryegrass) for slope protection were used to measure the adaptability between overlaying soil and plants; the pH of suitable soil for Festuca elata is 4.7~8.5, and that for Ryegrass is 6~7. These two plant seeds were purchased from Taobao and produced in Jiangsu, China.

2.2. Specimen Preparation and Test Procedure

2.2.1. Mix Proportion

In this research, five types of MSW used as ecological slope-protected base material for VC (i.e., kitchen waste, wheat straw, fly ash, silica fume and fallen leaves) were added to three different percentages of Portland cement (4%, 8% and 12%) under different mix compositions. A total of 30 mixtures of VC specimens were designed, which are listed in Table 2.

2.2.2. Planting Tests

The procedure for fabricating MSW-modified VC is presented in Figure 2. The substrates of VC were first prepared according to the proportions, and the samples were fabricated by filling the substrates into the incubators with a thickness of 8 cm. Then, 150 seeds (N0) of each grass were sown evenly into the upper layers of the samples, which were covered with an approximately 1 cm thick layer of substrate to prevent drying. Furthermore, the samples were labelled and placed in a curing room. Finally, an appropriate amount of water was sprayed once every 3 days for 60 days. The growth characteristics of the vegetation concrete grass species were monitored for 60 days, during which the average seed germination and grass height were observed at the specified planting age (e.g., 5 d, 10 d, 15 d, 20 d, 30 d, 40 d, 50 d and 60 d) (as presented in Figure 3). Then, seed germination rates were calculated.

2.2.3. Scouring Tests

The scouring resistance of soil (SRS) was measured in accordance with [38], and the test set-up is presented in Figure 4. When the planting age of 60 days was reached, VC samples with plants were demolded from the incubators, and the integrity of the root system was maintained without disturbance to the greatest extent possible (as shown in Figure 5a). Then, the VC samples were placed in the ‘samples chamber’ and exposed to a flow rate of 2 L/min on a slope of 30° over a period of 30 min in the ‘scouring flume’ (as shown in Figure 5b). A box for ‘quantity of sample’ placed at the foot of the slope was used to collect all the washed outflows. After 30 min, the outflows were allowed to stand for 2 h (as shown in Figure 5c) so the sediments could be thoroughly precipitated. Finally, the box was placed in a drying oven at 105 ± 2 °C to obtain the actual dry weight of the sediments.

3. Test Results and Discussion

Research has shown that seed germinations and plant growth are critical to community development, as well as the structure and sustainability of slopes [39,40]. Therefore, appropriate conditions should be developed for seed germination and plant growth to protect a slope and restore its ecological function, both of which are influenced by multiple environmental factors in the field.

3.1. Effect of MSW on Planting Properties

3.1.1. Basic Properties

The seed germinations of the two grasses were recorded as N1 and N2, respectively (Table 3). To determine grass length, five representative grasses for each mixture were measured with a ruler in each part of the test area, and their length was averaged (as listed in Table 4 and Table 5).
The equations employed to obtain the germination ratio (GR) of the two grasses were as follows:
GR1 = N1/N0 × 100%
GR2 = N2/N0 × 100%
where N0 is the total amount of grass seeds.
As shown in Table 3, most mixes had high germination rates in the first 15 days and low germination rates in the last 15 days. Moreover, it took 7.3 days and 11.1 days to reach a 50% germination rate for Ryegrass and Festuca elata, respectively. At the end of the 30-day observation period, the average germination rate of Ryegrass and Festuca elata reached 91.7% and 80.9%, respectively, which may indicate that the designed mixtures were suitable environments for plant growth.
As shown in Table 4 and Table 5, higher grass heights for all seeds were observed in the first 30 days. At the end of the 30-day observation period, the average grass heights of Ryegrass and Festuca elata reached 12.7 cm and 10.4 cm, respectively, reaching, 13.9 cm and 12.8 cm, respectively, after 60 days, which may indicate that the designed mixtures were suitable environments for plant growth.

3.1.2. Effect of Cement Content on Seed Germination and Plant Height

The effects of concrete content on seed germination and plant height of each species were tested by comparative experiments, as illustrated in Figure 6 and Figure 7. Other environmental factors (soil and KW fertilizer) were controlled, with the concrete content varied in three treatments (4%, 8% and 12%); red lines denote a comparative group, and green lines represent another group. As shown in Figure 6 and Figure 7, the germination rates and plant heights of each species decreased when concrete content increased from 4 to 12% in the comparative environments. For instance, on day 30, with 5% KW fertilizer, Ryegrass achieved a germination rate of 98% and that of 85% for Festuca elata both at 4% concrete content; while at 12% concrete content, germinations of Ryegrass and Festuca elata decreased to 92% and 80%, respectively. Similar results have been reported in the literature. For example, Chen et al. [9] reported that seed germination of F. arundinacea and M. sativa decreased with increased concrete content. In addition, on day 30 with 5% KW fertilizer, the plant height of Ryegrass and Festuca elata reached 14.1 cm and 14.0 cm with 4% concrete, respectively; and those decreased to 13.5 cm and 11.6 cm at 12% concrete content, respectively. The test results showed the concrete content had greater effects on Festuca elata. Comparing the red and green lines with the same labels, germination rates and plant heights of each species increased when KW fertilizer content increased from 0 to 5% with the same cement content.

3.1.3. Effect of MSW on Grass Heights

The growth properties of Ryegrass and Festuca elata affected by KW fertilizer are shown in Figure 8 and Figure 9, respectively. In general, after 15 days, with an increase in KW fertilizer content from 0 to 15%, the plant heights of Ryegrass were increased. When KW fertilizer content increased from 5 to 15%, the plant heights of Festuca elata fluctuated from day 0 to day 60. The overall difference was not obvious, although all heights were higher than with 0% KW fertilizer content after 40 days, as shown in Figure 9. We conclude that KW fertilizer can be used for VC. Moreover, Ryegrass preferred a high KW fertilizer content for a remarkable plant height, whereas Festuca elata thrived with any KW fertilizer content.
Considering the trade-off between mechanical property and vegetation characteristics of VC, the percentage of the cement content in the following VC samples was controlled as 8%. Figure 10 and Figure 11 show the effect of silica fume content on the plant height. With the increase in silica fume content from 0 to 8%, the plant heights of each group fluctuated from day 0 to day 25. The plant heights were the lowest when the silica fume content reached the highest concentration (8%) in each group at 60 days. However, when the ratio of KW fertilizer content was 5%, with an increase in silica fume content from 0 to 6%, the plant heights of both species were increased from day 30 to day 60, as presented in Figure 10a and Figure 11a. When the ratio of KW fertilizer content increased to 10%, with an increase in silica fume content from 4 to 8%, the plant heights of Festuca elata were decreased obviously after 20 days, as shown in Figure 11b. This may indicate a combined action of KW fertilizer and silica fume content on plant height, so the addition of silica fume content should be considered together with the KW fertilizer content.
Figure 12 and Figure 13 show the effect of fly ash content on plant height. With an increase in fly ash content from 10 to 30%, the plant heights of each group also fluctuated. However, the overall difference was not obvious. After 20 days, the plant heights were the highest when no fly ash content added to each group, as shown in Figure 12 and Figure 13a. The test results provide evidence of an inhibition between fly ash content and plant height. Figure 14 and Figure 15 illustrate the effect of wheat straw content on plant height. With an increase in wheat straw content from 0 to 1.0%, the plant heights of Ryegrass decreased after 15 days, as illustrated in Figure 14. As shown in Figure 15a, the plant heights of Festuca elata decreased after 15 days when the ratio of KW fertilizer content was 5%. The ratio of KW fertilizer content was increased by 10%, and there was no obvious inhibitory effect before day 30 when the wheat straw content was increased from 0 to 1.0%, as presented in Figure 15b. On the whole, after 30 days, the test results show an inverse relation between wheat straw content and plant height. The plant heights were the highest when there was no wheat straw content. This may indicate that the plant heights mainly rely on the properties of the soil added to concrete and KW fertilizer, and the additions of fly ash and wheat straw content have an inhibitory effect on plant heights. As illustrated in Figure 16a, with an increase in fallen leaves content from 0 to 1%, the plant heights of Ryegrass increased from day 30 to day 60. As shown in Figure 16b, there was an obvious inhibitory effect on the plant heights of Festuca elata when the fallen leaves content increased to 1.0% from day 10 to day 45. However, there was no significant difference in the plant heights on day 60. In general, adding a small amount of fallen leaves to VC can promote the growth of Ryegrass to some extent.
In general, MSW contents, such as KW fertilizer, fly ash and wheat straw, have an obvious effect on the germination rates and plant heights of both species. In our study, the former promoted them, whereas the others restrained them. Fallen leaves content slightly promoted germination rates and plant heights, whereas silica fume content had increased them to some extent. The combined action of silica fume content and KW fertilizer content had a positive effect on the germination rates and plant heights of both species with a moderate addition of silica fume (<4%). This indicates that the combined admixtures lowered the pH of VC to some extent, improving the plant development environment. The combined action of fly ash content and KW fertilizer content had an inhibitory effect on the germination rates and plant heights of both species, as did the combined action of wheat straw content and KW fertilizer content. Researchers have reported that the addition of fly ash content [7,36] or KW fertilizer (a raw material for biochar [8]) [20] decreased the pH of VC, which promoted vegetation growth. Our test results indicate that the combination of fly ash content and KW fertilizer content decreased the pH of VC to a certain extent, which was beyond the suitable pH of the soil for vegetation growth of Ryegrass and Festuca elata.

3.2. Scouring Resistance of Soil (SRS)

SRS can be determined according to the following Equation (3) [3]:
SRS = f × t/W
where f is the water flow rate (L/min), t is the scouring time (min) and W is the weight of the oven-dried sediment (g). Higher SRS values of samples represent a higher resistance to scouring. The SRS test results are listed in Table 6.
Figure 17 shows that KW fertilizer content significantly affected the scouring resistance of both species. The scouring resistance of both species increased considerably when KW fertilizer content increased to 5%, achieving the highest scouring resistances of 30.9 L/g and 35.9 L/g with 8% concrete content for Ryegrass and 12% concrete content for Festuca elata, respectively. The scouring resistance decreased when KW fertilizer content increased from 5 to 15%, which may indicate that the optimum ratio of KW fertilizer content with respect to scouring resistance of VC was 5%. Meanwhile, the scouring resistances of Ryegrass and Festuca elata peaked with concrete content of 8% and 12%, respectively.
Figure 18 and Figure 19 show the effect of silica fume and fly ash contents on the scouring resistance of VC. With an increase in silica fume content from 0 to 8%, the scouring resistance of each group decreased. With an increase in fly ash content from 0 to 30%, the scouring resistance of each group fluctuated. The scouring resistances were the highest when no silica fume content nor fly ash content was added to the specimens. This may indicate the scouring resistances relative to plant heights, which mainly rely on the properties of the soil added with concrete and KW fertilizer, so the additions of silica fume and fly ash had almost no positive effect on plant height.
Figure 20 shows the effect of wheat straw content on the scouring resistance of VC. The scouring resistance of both species increased slightly when wheat straw content increased to 0.5% and achieved the highest scouring resistances. The scouring resistance decreased slightly when wheat straw content increased from 0.5 to 1%. This may indicate that the optimum ratio of wheat straw content on the scouring resistance of VC for both species was 0.5% (as shown in Figure 21a). As depicted in Figure 21b, with an increase in fallen leaves content from 0 to 1%, the scouring resistance of both species decreased, with an inverse relation between fallen leaves content and scouring resistance.
In general, the effect of KW fertilizer content on the scouring resistance of both species was related to the cement content, which means that the SRS is influenced by the combined action of KW fertilizer and cement contents (as shown in Figure 17). Under the same KW fertilizer and cement contents, the addition of silica fume or fallen leaves decreased the SRS of both species, whereas neither fly ash nor wheat straw addition had an obvious inhibitory promoting effect on SRS. The highest SRS for both species is shown in Figure 21a, where the mix proportion of MSW-modified VC is comprised of 5% KW fertilizer, 8% cement and 0.5% wheat straw. Therefore, the combination of a moderate amount of KW fertilizer, cement and wheat straw effectively improved the SRS of the soil.

4. Conclusions

With the continuous development of the social economy, the establishment of sustainable materials and practices is important for future environments. Therefore, in this study, we investigated the effects of MSW (i.e., kitchen waste, wheat straw, fly ash, silica fume and fallen leaves) on vegetation characteristics of modified VC by comparative experiments. To modify plant adaptability in the environment of VC, MSW was added as an amendment to fabricate VC with different mix proportions. The effects of MSW on seed germination, grass height and the scouring resistance of different grass species were evaluated. Our results can pave the path for further research on waste management of MSW and contribute to beneficial knowledge for future research on the feasibility of the use these species with VC technology for slope ecological restoration. Our main conclusions are as follows:
(1)
The designed mixtures were suitable for growing the two tested species. Most mixes had high germination rates in the first 15 days and low germination rates in the last 15 days.
(2)
The germination rates and plant heights of both species decreased with an increase in concrete content; the scouring resistances of Ryegrass and Festuca elata peaked with concrete contents of 8% and 12%, respectively.
(3)
Ryegrass preferred high KW fertilizer content for a remarkable plant height, whereas the optimum ratio of KW fertilizer content with respect to the scouring resistance of both species was 5%.
(4)
Moderate silica fume content (e.g., <4%) had a positive effect on the plant heights of both species, whereas silica fume content had an inverse effect on the scouring resistance of both species.
(5)
The addition of fly ash and wheat straw content had an inhibitory effect on plant height, but the scouring resistance of both species increased slightly when wheat straw content was increased to 0.5% and achieved the highest scouring resistances.
(6)
A small amount of fallen leaves added to VC can promote the growth of Ryegrass somewhat and slightly for Festuca elata; however, fallen leaves content had an inverse effect on the scouring resistance of both species.
(7)
Considering the scouring resistances, the optimal mix proportion of MSW-modified VC were recommended as No. 25 with 5% KW fertilizer, 8% cement and 0.5% wheat straw in this study.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Conceptualization was performed by X.W.; experiments were carried out by W.G.; methodology was performed by L.K.; the first draft of the manuscript was written by L.K.; review and editing were performed by Y.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the “National Natural Science Foundation of China (NNSFC)” under grant numbers 71901104 and “Jiangsu Smart Factory Engineering Research Center” under grant number JSSFER2019A3.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yang, Y.S.; Xu, W.N.; Xia, Z.Y.; Yang, Q. Research on the Evaluation of the Soil Quality in the Evolution of Ecological Slope-Protected Base Material. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2012, 193, 274–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Duan, L.; Huang, M.; Zhang, L. Differences in hydrological responses for different vegetation types on a steep slope on the Loess Plateau, China. J. Hydrol. 2016, 537, 356–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, L.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, X.; Chen, M.; Lu, L.; Cheng, X. Effects of super absorbent polymer on scouring resistance and water retention performance of soil for growing plants in ecological concrete. Ecol. Eng. 2019, 138, 237–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, X.; Poon, C.S.; Sun, H.; Lo, I.; Kirk, D.W. Heavy metal speciation and leaching behaviors in cement based solidified/stabilized waste materials. J. Hazard. Mater. 2001, 82, 215–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cao, Y.; Wang, B.; Guo, H.; Xiao, H.; Wei, T. The effect of super absorbent polymers on soil and water conservation on the terraces of the loess plateau. Ecol. Eng. 2017, 102, 270–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rajasekaran, G. Sulphate attack and ettringite formation in the lime and cement stabilized marine clays. Ocean. Eng. 2005, 32, 1133–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tang, W.; Mohseni, E.; Wang, Z. Development of vegetation concrete technology for slope protection and greening. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 179, 605–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhao, M.; Jia, Y.; Yuan, L.; Qiu, J.; Xie, C. Experimental study on the vegetation characteristics of biochar-modified vegetation concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 206, 321–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, F.; Xu, Y.; Wang, C.; Mao, J. Effects of concrete content on seed germination and seedling establishment in vegetation concrete matrix in slope restoration. Ecol. Eng. 2013, 58, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yan, X.B.; Lu, L.C.; Gong, C.C.; De Wang, S. Preparation and Properties of Sulphoaluminate Cementitious Materials with Low Alkalinity. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2012, 174–177, 1164–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Martin, L.H.; Winnefeld, F.; Müller, C.J.; Lothenbach, B. Contribution of limestone to the hydration of calcium sulfoaluminate cement. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2015, 62, 204–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yuan, D.H.; Guo, X.J.; Xiong, Y.; Cui, J.; Yin, X.A.; Li, Y.Z. Pollutant-removal performance and variability of DOM quantity and composition with traditional ecological concrete (TEC) and improved multi-aggregate eco-concrete (IMAEC) revetment treatments. Ecol. Eng. 2017, 105, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gong, C.; Zhou, X.; Dai, W.; Liu, Y.; Lu, L.; Cheng, X. Effects of carbamide on fluidity and setting time of sulphoaluminate cement and properties of planting concrete from sulphoaluminate cement. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 182, 290–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chang, I.; Jeon, M.; Cho, G.C. Application of microbial biopolymers as an alternative construction binder for earth buildings in underdeveloped countries. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2015, 2015, 326745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Chang, I.; Im, J.; Chung, M.K.; Cho, G.C. Bovine casein as a new soil strengthening binder from diary wastes. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 160, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, Y.; Guo, R.; Li, Y.C.; Liu, H.; Zhan, T.L. A degradation model for high kitchen waste content municipal solid waste. Waste Manag. 2016, 58, 376–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chand Malav, L.; Yadav, K.K.; Gupta, N.; Kumar, S.; Sharma, G.K.; Krishnan, S.; Rezania, S.; Kamyab, H.; Pham, Q.B.; Yadav, S.; et al. A review on municipal solid waste as a renewable source for waste-to-energy project in India, Current practices, challenges, and future opportunities. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 277, 123227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hoornweg, D.; Bhada-Tata, P. What A Waste, A Global Review of Solid Waste Management; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  19. Li, M.; Li, F.; Zhou, J.; Yuan, Q.; Hu, N. Fallen leaves are superior to tree pruning as bulking agents in aerobic composting disposing kitchen waste. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 346, 126374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yu, D.; Yu, Y.; Tang, J.; Li, X.; Ke, C.; Yao, Z. Application fields of kitchen waste biochar and its prospects as catalytic material, A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 810, 152171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Singh, M.K.; Sharma, J.S.; Fleming, I.R. Shear strength testing of intact and recompacted samples of municipal solid waste. Can. Geotech. J. 2009, 46, 1133–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pulat, H.F.; Yukselen-Aksoy, Y. Factors affecting the shear strength behavior of municipal solid wastes. Waste Manag. 2017, 69, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cho, Y.M.; Ko, J.H.; Chi, L.; Townsend, T.G. Food waste impact on municipal solid waste angle of internal friction. Waste Manag. 2011, 31, 26–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yuan, P.; Kavazanjian Jr, E.; Chen, W.; Seo, B. Compositional effects on the dynamic properties of municipal solid waste. Waste Manag. 2011, 31, 2380–2390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zekkos, D.; Bray, J.D.; Riemer, M.F. Drained response of municipal solid waste in large-scale triaxial shear testing. Waste Manag. 2012, 32, 1873–1885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zekkos, D.; Fei, X. Constant load and constant volume response of municipal solid waste in simple shear. Waste Manag. 2017, 63, 380–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xu, Y. Unconfined Compressive Strength of Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Bottom Ashes. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 2019, 37, 1373–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ren, J.; Hu, L.; Dong, Z.; Tang, L.; Xing, F.; Liu, J. Effect of silica fume on the mechanical property and hydration characteristic of alkali-activated municipal solid waste incinerator (MSWI) fly ash. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 295, 126317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, Q.; Su, L.J.; Xiao, H.; Xu, W.N.; Yan, W.M.; Xia, Z.Y. Preparation of shale ceramsite vegetative porous concrete and its performance as a planting medium. Eur. J. Environ. Civil. Eng. 2021, 25, 2111–2126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cheng, J.F.; Luo, X.Y.; Shen, Z.Y.; Guo, X.Q. Study on Vegetation Concrete Technology for Slope Protection and Greening Engineering. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2020, 29, 4017–4028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hu, H.; Zhou, M.T.; Hu, X.D. Development of Composite Antifreeze to Ecological Slope Protection Substrate. Adv. Mater. Res. 2014, 827, 355–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bao, X.; Liao, W.; Dong, Z.; Wang, S.; Tang, W. Development of Vegetation-Pervious Concrete in Grid Beam System for Soil Slope Protection. Materials 2017, 10, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kim, H.H.; Park, C.G. Plant Growth and Water Purification of Porous Vegetation Concrete Formed of Blast Furnace Slag, Natural Jute Fiber and Styrene Butadiene Latex. Sustainability 2016, 8, 386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Faiz, H.; Serina, N.; Rahman, M. A state-of-the-art review on the advancement of sustainable vegetation concrete in slope stability. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 326, 126502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, D.L.; Zhao, Q.X.; Yang, C.; Chi, Y.A.; Qi, W.Y.; Teng, Z.C. Study on frost resistance and vegetation performance of seashell waste pervious concrete in cold area. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 265, 120758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Martirena, F.; Monzó, J. Vegetable ashes as Supplementary Cementitious Materials. Cem. Concr. Res. 2018, 114, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Shu, T.; Tong, L.; Guo, H.; Li, X.; Bai, B.; Chen, Y.; Nie, X. Research Status of Generation and Management of Garden Waste in China, A case of Shanghai. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2021; Volume 766, p. 012074. [Google Scholar]
  38. Zhou, Z.C.; Gan, Z.T.; Shangguan, Z.P.; Dong, Z.B. Effects of grazing on soil physical properties and soil erodibility in semiarid grassland of the Northern Loess Plateau (China). Catena 2010, 82, 87–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Baeten, L.; Jacquemyn, H.; Van-Calster, H.; Van-Beek, E.; Devlaeminck, R.; Verheyen, K.; Hermy, M. Low recruitment across life stages partly accounts for the slow colonization of forest herbs. J. Ecol. 2009, 97, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Xu, Y.; Chena, F. Effects of concrete content in vegetation concrete matrix on seed germination and seeding establishment of cynodon dactylon. Procedia Eng. 2012, 28, 105–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Location and administrative division of the study area.
Figure 1. Location and administrative division of the study area.
Ijerph 19 08143 g001
Figure 2. MSW used for VC sample production. (a) Soil; (b) KW fertilizer; (c) wheat straw; (d) fallen leaves; (e) mixing; (f) filling the mold.
Figure 2. MSW used for VC sample production. (a) Soil; (b) KW fertilizer; (c) wheat straw; (d) fallen leaves; (e) mixing; (f) filling the mold.
Ijerph 19 08143 g002
Figure 3. Actual effect pictures of adaptability investigation. (a) Ecological concrete covering soil with seeds; (b) sowing seeds for 10 days; (c) sowing seeds for 30 days; (d) sowing seeds for 60 days.
Figure 3. Actual effect pictures of adaptability investigation. (a) Ecological concrete covering soil with seeds; (b) sowing seeds for 10 days; (c) sowing seeds for 30 days; (d) sowing seeds for 60 days.
Ijerph 19 08143 g003
Figure 4. Setup for SRS test.
Figure 4. Setup for SRS test.
Ijerph 19 08143 g004
Figure 5. SRS test configuration: (a) VC sample with plants; (b) test process; (c) washed outflows.
Figure 5. SRS test configuration: (a) VC sample with plants; (b) test process; (c) washed outflows.
Ijerph 19 08143 g005aIjerph 19 08143 g005b
Figure 6. Seed germination rates related to different percentages of cement: (a) Ryegrass; (b) Festuca elata.
Figure 6. Seed germination rates related to different percentages of cement: (a) Ryegrass; (b) Festuca elata.
Ijerph 19 08143 g006
Figure 7. Plant heights related to different percentages of cement: (a) Ryegrass; (b) Festuca elata.
Figure 7. Plant heights related to different percentages of cement: (a) Ryegrass; (b) Festuca elata.
Ijerph 19 08143 g007
Figure 8. Ryegrass height relative to KW fertilizer content with different percentages of cement: (a) 4% cement; (b) 8% cement; (c) 12% cement.
Figure 8. Ryegrass height relative to KW fertilizer content with different percentages of cement: (a) 4% cement; (b) 8% cement; (c) 12% cement.
Ijerph 19 08143 g008
Figure 9. Festuca elata height relative to KW fertilizer content with different percentages of cement: (a) 4% cement; (b) 8% cement; (c) 12% cement.
Figure 9. Festuca elata height relative to KW fertilizer content with different percentages of cement: (a) 4% cement; (b) 8% cement; (c) 12% cement.
Ijerph 19 08143 g009
Figure 10. Ryegrass height related to silica fume combined with: (a) 5% KW fertilizer content; (b) 10% KW fertilizer content.
Figure 10. Ryegrass height related to silica fume combined with: (a) 5% KW fertilizer content; (b) 10% KW fertilizer content.
Ijerph 19 08143 g010
Figure 11. Festuca elata height relative to silica fume content combined with: (a) 5% KW fertilizer content; (b) 10% KW fertilizer content.
Figure 11. Festuca elata height relative to silica fume content combined with: (a) 5% KW fertilizer content; (b) 10% KW fertilizer content.
Ijerph 19 08143 g011
Figure 12. Ryegrass height relative to fly ash content combined with: (a) 5% KW fertilizer content; (b) 10% KW fertilizer content.
Figure 12. Ryegrass height relative to fly ash content combined with: (a) 5% KW fertilizer content; (b) 10% KW fertilizer content.
Ijerph 19 08143 g012
Figure 13. Festuca elata height relative to fly ash content combined with: (a) 5% KW fertilizer content; (b) 10% KW fertilizer content.
Figure 13. Festuca elata height relative to fly ash content combined with: (a) 5% KW fertilizer content; (b) 10% KW fertilizer content.
Ijerph 19 08143 g013
Figure 14. Ryegrass height relative to wheat straw content combined with: (a) 5% KW fertilizer content; (b) 10% KW fertilizer content.
Figure 14. Ryegrass height relative to wheat straw content combined with: (a) 5% KW fertilizer content; (b) 10% KW fertilizer content.
Ijerph 19 08143 g014
Figure 15. Festuca elata height relative to wheat straw content combined with: (a) 5% KW fertilizer content; (b) 10% KW fertilizer content.
Figure 15. Festuca elata height relative to wheat straw content combined with: (a) 5% KW fertilizer content; (b) 10% KW fertilizer content.
Ijerph 19 08143 g015
Figure 16. Plant heights relative to fallen leaves content combined with 5% KW fertilizer: (a) Ryegrass; (b) Festuca elata.
Figure 16. Plant heights relative to fallen leaves content combined with 5% KW fertilizer: (a) Ryegrass; (b) Festuca elata.
Ijerph 19 08143 g016
Figure 17. Scouring resistance of VC relative to KW fertilizer content: (a) Ryegrass; (b) Festuca elata.
Figure 17. Scouring resistance of VC relative to KW fertilizer content: (a) Ryegrass; (b) Festuca elata.
Ijerph 19 08143 g017
Figure 18. Scouring resistance of VC relative to silica fume content: (a) Ryegrass; (b) Festuca elata.
Figure 18. Scouring resistance of VC relative to silica fume content: (a) Ryegrass; (b) Festuca elata.
Ijerph 19 08143 g018
Figure 19. Scouring resistance of VC relative to fly ash content: (a) Ryegrass; (b) Festuca elata.
Figure 19. Scouring resistance of VC relative to fly ash content: (a) Ryegrass; (b) Festuca elata.
Ijerph 19 08143 g019
Figure 20. Scouring resistance of VC relative to wheat straw content: (a) Ryegrass; (b) Festuca elata.
Figure 20. Scouring resistance of VC relative to wheat straw content: (a) Ryegrass; (b) Festuca elata.
Ijerph 19 08143 g020
Figure 21. Scouring resistance of VC relative to: (a) wheat straw combined with 5% KW fertilizer; and (b) fallen leaves contents combined with 5% KW fertilizer.
Figure 21. Scouring resistance of VC relative to: (a) wheat straw combined with 5% KW fertilizer; and (b) fallen leaves contents combined with 5% KW fertilizer.
Ijerph 19 08143 g021
Table 1. Physical performance indices of the soil.
Table 1. Physical performance indices of the soil.
Relative DensityPlastic Limit (%)Liquid Limit (%)MDD (g/cm³)OMC (%)
2.517.632.31.7315.6
Table 2. Composition ratios of the MSW for VC.
Table 2. Composition ratios of the MSW for VC.
Specimen No.Material (% Weight)
Kitchen WasteCementSilica Fume Fly AshWheat StrawFallen Leaves
10.04.0
20.08.0
30.012.0
45.04.0
55.08.0
65.012.0
710.04.0
810.08.0
910.012.0
1015.04.0
1115.08.0
1215.012.0
135.08.04.0
1410.08.04.0
155.08.06.0
1610.08.06.0
175.08.08.0
1810.08.08.0
195.08.0 10.0
2010.08.0 10.0
215.08.0 20.0
2210.08.0 20.0
235.08.0 30.0
2410.08.0 30.0
255.08.0 0.5
2610.08.0 0.5
275.08.0 1.0
2810.08.0 1.0
295.08.0 0.5
3010.08.0 1.0
Table 3. Relationship between seed germination and planting time.
Table 3. Relationship between seed germination and planting time.
No.Number of Ryegrass Seed Germinations (N1)Number of Festuca elata Seed Germinations (N2)
5 Days10 Days15 Days20 Days30 Days5 Days10 Days15 Days20 Days30 Days
1781111321361375485103117125
27095121134136427090102122
3528310913013128567588112
4891241421461476490106117128
56999122138143568296108125
66589116129138497392106120
776116131142144517998111126
86091115131140437699109127
96592114126137226489102123
107011712512813442678795112
116610511912413136608594111
12659511112313023476990107
136797120134141496993102124
145590115130138427093102122
156389112132136416287100123
165888115134136426684103118
17558711813013335598395116
18488610812313434628195117
196193118136140537189103119
204474103126137406686105120
21438010712813748678397115
2239699511813735638298117
23286710212013046637891113
2440659211313337628194114
2559103128140144457596106128
267399127134141597793112130
27591021301351385381100120132
28651011281401425485100110130
295392116129142518199115131
3054991171271386093109123132
Table 4. Average grass heights of Ryegrass.
Table 4. Average grass heights of Ryegrass.
No.Average Grass Heights of Ryegrass at Age (cm)
5 Days10 Days15 Days20 Days30 Days40 Days50 Days60 Days
11.25.69.011.012.512.813.213.6
21.15.28.510.412.012.612.913.4
30.25.08.110.011.412.212.913.1
41.15.910.512.513.413.914.014.1
51.04.910.112.112.913.613.813.9
61.24.510.612.412.913.313.413.5
71.55.19.912.513.614.014.414.8
81.55.19.912.513.614.014.414.8
91.04.910.112.112.913.613.813.9
100.75.211.113.114.314.615.215.2
111.15.811.512.513.814.415.015.0
120.34.99.111.913.413.614.014.1
131.06.310.612.913.513.714.114.1
140.36.110.112.413.414.014.514.7
150.66.09.612.413.714.114.314.6
161.05.59.610.912.513.614.114.5
171.05.99.911.612.412.712.913.3
181.37.011.112.312.813.614.014.2
190.76.29.611.011.912.112.512.5
200.25.010.011.712.012.413.013.6
210.46.410.011.512.012.212.512.7
220.56.89.911.512.112.412.813.0
230.04.810.511.712.513.013.613.5
240.45.29.011.312.312.613.513.8
250.26.99.411.212.112.813.213.3
260.35.29.211.412.512.913.313.7
270.35.79.310.511.711.912.413.1
280.34.67.911.011.712.513.113.2
290.67.39.612.112.913.914.314.5
300.45.99.111.413.614.314.615.0
Table 5. Average grass heights of Festuca elata.
Table 5. Average grass heights of Festuca elata.
No.Average Grass Heights of Festuca elata at Age (cm)
5 Days10 Days15 Days20 Days30 Days40 Days50 Days60 Days
10.44.67.89.610.811.612.112.3
20.34.27.09.210.511.111.912.1
30.43.35.56.98.49.610.511.1
40.64.18.511.112.613.313.714.0
50.44.78.010.411.512.512.913.0
60.73.87.59.09.910.411.011.6
70.53.66.99.911.913.213.914.1
80.22.76.48.19.911.312.313.1
90.24.06.17.49.09.911.212.0
100.43.68.110.612.513.714.314.7
110.54.27.69.911.912.513.013.1
120.23.06.68.79.710.911.412.2
130.24.16.49.111.312.713.414.3
140.44.87.910.011.813.915.216.4
151.13.78.09.611.812.913.614.5
160.43.45.98.510.711.813.015.0
170.23.86.69.110.010.611.311.7
180.13.36.98.59.911.011.812.8
190.64.15.98.49.19.510.511.2
200.33.87.18.09.611.011.712.3
210.33.36.98.19.19.810.411.1
220.24.37.17.59.610.711.712.5
230.13.55.98.010.010.911.712.1
240.23.86.49.010.611.412.412.9
250.33.85.47.69.610.611.311.7
260.45.06.98.69.910.711.812.5
270.35.26.67.58.910.311.011.1
280.24.16.07.49.510.711.612.1
290.44.47.08.510.912.112.913.4
300.13.36.07.69.811.012.113.2
Table 6. SRS results after 60 days.
Table 6. SRS results after 60 days.
No.Ryegrass (L/g)Festuca elata (L/g)
113.316.2
213.612.6
312.012.5
415.023.3
530.923.3
624.535.9
718.215.0
819.122.8
922.516.4
1017.310.1
1117.614.2
1217.515.5
1313.612.9
1415.416.3
1510.312.3
1614.917.9
176.86.2
1813.713.4
1919.316.3
2019.120.1
2128.321.5
2219.522.1
2311.410.9
2410.68.9
2534.540.8
2622.425.8
2718.016.1
2818.115.2
2917.612.8
3014.911.0
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kong, L.; Wang, X.; Guo, W.; Zhang, Y. Effects of Municipal Solid Waste on Planting Properties and Scouring Resistance of Vegetation Concrete (Wuhan, China). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 8143. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19138143

AMA Style

Kong L, Wang X, Guo W, Zhang Y. Effects of Municipal Solid Waste on Planting Properties and Scouring Resistance of Vegetation Concrete (Wuhan, China). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(13):8143. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19138143

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kong, Liulin, Xiaomei Wang, Wencheng Guo, and Yongcheng Zhang. 2022. "Effects of Municipal Solid Waste on Planting Properties and Scouring Resistance of Vegetation Concrete (Wuhan, China)" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 13: 8143. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19138143

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop