You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
  • Review
  • Open Access

29 June 2022

Green Jobs—A Literature Review

,
,
,
,
and
1
Department of Economics and Economic Policies, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 6 Romana Sq., District 1, 010734 Bucharest, Romania
2
Department of Economic Doctrines and Communication, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 6 Romana Sq., District 1, 010734 Bucharest, Romania
3
Department of Modern Languages and Business Communication, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 6 Romana Sq., District 1, 010734 Bucharest, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Health Environment and Sustainable Development

Abstract

In the past two decades the topic of “green jobs” has drawn particular attention, resulting in a widely diverse and relatively large number of published papers. Although a determinant for the increase of knowledge, the heterogeneity of these studies may raise the issue of a systematic documentation of the key contributions in this field. In this context, the present research focuses on analyzing the scientific literature published in the last five years on the topic of “green jobs” with the aim to identify definitions and meanings associated with the concept of “green jobs”, the connected terms, areas of research interest and the main theoretical and practical results. The results reveal that although there is no uniformity in the definition of the concept, there is still a convergence towards the initial meaning offered by the UNEP/ILO/IOE/ITUC Report of 2008. Moreover, using scientific software VOSViewer our research shows that the concept of “green jobs” is most linked with the following terms: sustainable development, the green economy, the circular economy, the welfare economy, the European Green Pact, energy, renewable energy, economic development, and employment. Furthermore, our analysis reveals that the studies focused on “green jobs” are mainly concerned with the following issues: green jobs creation, work-life balance, correlations between green business and green jobs and the role of local government in supporting green jobs.

1. Introduction

In recent years, one of the most debated topics among scholars, as well as policymakers, has related to climate change and the most efficient response to its detrimental consequences. According to the European Commission (2019), the global atmosphere is warming and that may cause the extinction of no less than one million out of eight million species []. In this context, climate change and degradation of the natural environment at the same time have been recognized as global factors for change. Thus, an important step to fight this phenomenon was taken in 2019 with adoption of the Green Deal. This is seen as a new growth strategy decoupled from the use of resources; one which will seek a stop to the production of net greenhouse gas emissions until 2050, aim at conserving the EU’s natural capital and to protect the health and well-being of its citizens from the challenges posed by detrimental impacts on the environment [].
Given the emergence of “black swan” surprises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic and the war in Ukraine, it is becoming more than necessary to implement measures that will lead to a successful Green Deal, considering the application of the principles of solidarity, sustainable development, and well-being. In this context, it has become more evident than ever that there is an urgent need to move forward with an older initiative—the Green Jobs Initiative. “The Green Jobs Initiative” emerged as a result of a partnership between the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP), the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC), the International Organization of Employers (IOE) and the International Labor Organization (ILO). The main goal of this partnership is the promotion of opportunities, equity, and a fair transition to sustainable economies []. The first report published in 2008 defines “green jobs” as any decent work that contributes to maintaining and restoring the quality of the environment, whether it is agriculture, industry, services, or administration. This outcome may be achieved by reducing energy consumption and raw materials, minimizing pollution and waste, protecting, and restoring ecosystems and enabling companies and communities to adapt to climate change [].
Over time, creating green jobs has come to be seen as a possible solution for creating new jobs, while the green economy has come to be seen as a solution to climate change, environmental degradation and poverty growth.
Using color coding to create a more vivid picture of the labor market is not new. One can find examples in the literature referring to professions that are white, blue, pink, gold and green []. According to [], green collar workers could include individuals who practice professions encompassing sustainable development principles in the upgrading of processes (for instance: jobs in the public transport sector, renewable energy sources, construction and waste management).
The studies related to “green job” concepts are usually conducted in two ways—either qualitative or quantitative. The quantitative approach mainly revolves around the idea of designing econometric models based on variables describing the number of green jobs in national economies, while the qualitative approach describes green jobs in terms of the specific skills needed to perform tasks [].
Moreover, the definition of “green jobs” is approached in various ways in the existing literature and there are significant discrepancies when it comes to issues such as the economic importance of jobs, environmental protection, equality and social justice or sustainable development principles [,].
Nevertheless, one thing is certain, green jobs lead to the creation of a new management framework based on the need to connect to the eco-efficient technologies of the future and to use resources efficiently in an effort to reduce environmental pollution and climate change []. In addition, green jobs require decent work [], connecting the 1st Millennium Development Goal—poverty reduction—with the 7th Millennium Development Goal—environmental protection.
In addition, the European Commission [] defines a green job as being ”one that directly deals with information, technologies, or materials that preserves or restores environmental quality. This requires specialized skills, knowledge, training, or experience (e.g., verifying compliance with environmental legislation, monitoring resource efficiency within the company, promoting and selling green products and services)”. However, different economists formulate various definitions of green jobs. Hence, Colijn propose a slightly different definition of green jobs: ”A green job features characteristics that contribute to a socio-ecological transition in focus and activity through supporting an increase in the use of renewable energy or a reduction of the use of non-renewable energy” []. This definition actually proposes the use of several shades of green, depending on the involvement in the socio-ecological transition, being assigned a certain shade of green to each type of occupation depending on the extent to which work activities can be considered “green”.
There is no uniformity in the literature concerning the specific areas in which green jobs can be created. Therefore, the economic sectors prone to green job creation are differently showcased at the international level. For instance, the Bureau of Labor Statistics identifies activities related to pollution reduction and recycling, or activities specific to organic farms and non-energy activities []. On the other hand, the UNEP mentions broader sectors such as agriculture, production, research and development, renewable energy, services and administration and other sectors of the economy with a substantial participation in maintaining or restoring environmental quality [].
Against this background, the present paper builds on the previous work of a significant number of researchers and primarily attempts to provide guidance on the identification of current definitions as well as an anticipation of future definitions and how green jobs are perceived in diverse sectors of the economy.

2. Materials and Methods

The increased interest in sustainable development and the special emphasis on environmental protection have led to the development and publication in the last decade of a significant number of studies that have focused on topics such as sustainability, education for sustainability, green economy, green innovation, circular economy, sustainable entrepreneurship and, more recently and particularly, the concept of green jobs. The variety of issues addressed as well as the large number of published studies are undoubtedly positive aspects, but at the same time can raise several issues in the unitary identification of contributions to increasing knowledge in this field. In such a context, the defining role of a literature review is to systematize existing knowledge in a particular field to facilitate its use in further studies and research. In addition, the identification, synthetization, and analysis of existing studies allow for a deeper understanding of the field and may contribute to the development of new hypotheses or more rigorous testing of existing theories [].
In terms of sustainability in general and of the concepts traditionally associated with it, there are a number of current reviews in the literature [,,,], to which we may add a study on green human resource management []. However, in the case of the specific concept of green jobs, a systematic analysis of the studies published so far in this field could not be identified. In this context, the main objective of our research is to analyze the scientific literature to identify the definitions and meanings given to the term “green jobs”, the concepts associated with it, the research areas in which the concept is frequently encountered, and also the main theoretical and practical results obtained in the last 5 years in the research studies conducted on green jobs.
From a methodological perspective, in accordance with the research objective, the analysis included the following steps: (1) identifying the studies published and indexed in the Web of Science—Core Collection and Scopus databases—and selecting the works considered to be the most relevant for our analysis; (2) critical analysis of the selected articles from the perspective of their definition for the concept “green jobs”, the field of interest and the main results obtained; and (3) synthesis and interpretation of the results obtained following the analysis of selected articles from the research literature.
In the first stage, a scan of the papers published since 2008 in the Web of Science—Core Collection and Scopus databases—was performed using as a search criterion the identification of the concept “green jobs” in the title, abstract or keywords and selecting only the “article” type. The two databases were chosen because they contain the richest collection of scientific papers that have undergone a rigorous review process before being published and are the most relevant in that field. Web of Science is the oldest database [] and it includes 10,000 journals, while Scopus is the largest database for multidisciplinary scientific literature []. The search period has been fixed since 2008 because in this specific year the first explicit definition of the concept “green jobs” was identified [].
Information concerning the number of articles identified following the application of the search criteria in the two databases, by publication period, is presented in Table 1. Given that most papers can be indexed in both databases, a cumulation of numbers would not be relevant and could be misleading.
Table 1. Number of articles published on “green jobs”.
It is noted that there is a significant number of published articles on the topic of “green jobs” during the period under review, but at the same time it can be easily seen that their number has increased significantly in recent years; in a period of 5 years (2018–2022) approximately the same number of articles were published and indexed as in the previous 10 years (2008–2017). In this context, our analysis focuses on the articles published since 2018. Moreover, to ensure that the articles are as relevant as possible and can be easily accessed by the academic community, we have selected those ones indexed both in Web of Science and in Scopus. First, since our analysis focuses on the definition of “green jobs”, we chose papers that use a previous or suggest a new definition for this concept. Second, we looked at the citations for each paper and selected primarily the papers with a high number of citations within Web of Science and Scopus databases. Third, the database with the selected articles was analyzed using the VOSViewer program (version 1.6.18 created by Nees Jan van Eck and Ludo Waltman from Centre for Science and Technology Studies at Leiden University) to identify the correlations between the key terms. The results of the correlation between the key terms are shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Network of key term associations.
As showcased in Figure 1, the concept “green jobs” is most often associated with the key term “sustainable development”, with which it has the strongest connection. There are also significant associations between “green jobs” and the following keywords: green economy, circular economy, welfare economy, European Green Deal, energy, renewable energy, economic development, employment. In addition, through sustainable development, the concept “green jobs” relates to other concepts, such as innovation, higher education, education for sustainable development, sustainable development goals, etc. According to these results, we selected the papers in which “green jobs” mainly correlates with topics specific to areas of interest such as green economy, circular economy, labor market, environmental protection, and higher education. Lastly, a selection criterion of a qualitative nature was applied to the articles meeting the above criteria, aiming at the degree to which the papers are relevant to the concept “green jobs”. As a result of applying these criteria, 25 articles summarized in Table 2 were selected.
Table 2. Reviewed articles.
All the above articles are going to be analyzed in the following sections in order to discover how their authors interpreted and defined “green job” and also to notice with what the topic of green jobs has frequently been associated with.

3. ”Green Jobs” Meanings in the Literature

Usually, social scientists as well as economists do not easily agree to a singular definition of the concepts they apply in their studies. Consistent with this empirical assumption, one may say that there is currently no unanimously accepted definition of green jobs among scholars or policymakers []. As may be noted, a first association, that almost emerged as a necessity, has been made between the “green jobs” and “decent work” concepts. This connection is the outcome of the hypothesis that green and decent work may be assumed as any provision of services performed under decent conditions following sustainability as main driver.
Since different jobs have diverse impacts on the environment, and decarbonization is a process that takes place gradually, the concept “green jobs” is also under a permanent construction, with no bounded content and meaning [].
In the literature the “green jobs” term has started to grow more in content in recent years, but the approach to areas that offer such opportunities and specific skills differ among published papers [] or from one country to another []. Meanwhile, the lack of a widely accepted definition comes with several issues [], including the precise highlighting of areas and the accurate number of such jobs. Valero et al. have shown that a top-down approach that uses a narrow definition of green jobs, considering only those industries or activities that are directly relevant to decarbonization, leads to an estimate of green jobs below 5% of employment in the United States or European economies. The same study emphasizes that when using a “bottom-up” definition, which contemplates jobs directly or indirectly related to the decarbonization, significantly higher percentages can be obtained [].
Another approach implicates classifying green jobs either as outcomes or as processes []. The first perspective goes towards generating environmentally friendly goods or services through these jobs, such as green buildings, clean transport, or solar water heating systems. The second angle assumes that green jobs contribute to greener processes, e.g., by reducing water consumption, controlling air pollution, or improving recycling services. In both cases, there is no question of results based on 100% environmentally friendly production processes or 100% environmentally friendly final goods or services. However, the key element is meeting the criteria of decent work [].
The prominence of green jobs has been noticed particularly following the emergence of the “Green Jobs Initiative” [], as well as the economic crisis of 2008–2009 [].
Following the scrutiny of the selected literature, one can easily presume that many studies have chosen to begun to approach green jobs in line with the “Green Jobs Initiative” description issued by the partnership between the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP), the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC), the International Organization of Employers (IOE) and the International Labor Organization (ILO). Thus, the studies conducted by: [,,,,,,,,,,,,] assess green jobs in terms of their ability to decrease the impact on the environment to a level that falls within the range of sustainability. Such jobs involve reducing the consumption of energy, raw materials, and water by adopting and implementing highly efficient strategies aimed at “decarbonizing the economy and reducing greenhouse gas emissions, to minimize or completely avoid all forms of waste and pollution, to protect and restore ecosystems and biodiversity” [], in line with the “Green Jobs Initiative” [].
The majority of the reviewed articles rather address the green jobs concept starting from a definition issued by an international body. For instance, Otieno and Ochieng (2018) designate green jobs as any work performed in sectors such as the production of goods and services, agriculture, administration, research and development and the provision of services, which promotes conservation or restoration of the quality of the environment []. Following the same reasoning, Traversi et al., shows that by green jobs one may understand all occupational jobs—from agriculture to administration and services—which contribute significantly to preserving or restoring the quality of the environment in terms of eliminating, reducing or mitigating the impact of pollution. The scale of such jobs is driven by the need to adopt methods of producing goods and services in an environmentally friendly manner to limit global warming and irreversible climate change [].
Drawing upon earlier studies and initiatives, several reviewed papers go back to the concept prior to 2008. For instance, [] recall that the OECD (1999) defined jobs as “green” if they produced goods and services for measuring, preventing, limiting, and minimizing damage to the environment, water, air, and soil. This study shows that from the OECD perspective, green jobs play a very important role, as they make substantial contributions to solving problems arising from the need for waste recycling, noise pollution, climate change and the restoration and improvement of ecosystems []. Therefore, they emphasize that this older definition is quite comprehensive, including all activities that use cleaner technologies, products, and services, with the ability to reduce environmental risks, methods and technologies that minimize pollution and any management practices that permit an efficient use of natural resources [].
Besides the definition of the “Green Jobs Initiative” [,] underscore that the progress made by several institutions of statistics is also worth considering, as the quantification of green jobs by field raises real issues for economists. Thus, the classification made by the US Department of Labor is highlighted, which differentiates “green” employment into three categories (green, new, and emerging, which have improved ecological skills and increased ecological demand) according to the level and the type of impact made by green economic activities and technologies on labor and employment demand. Using a slightly similar reasoning, Sulich and Zema point out that the definition of green jobs can be expressed as an assessing instrument based on the Classification of Activities in Poland, which has its roots in the classifications proposed by the UN, ISIC, and Eurostat []. According to [], green jobs, defined as a category in the Classification of Activities in Poland, can be a factor of: (1) sustainability of the relationship between economy, society, and environment; (2) assessment of the needs of society to be met in terms of environmental protection; (3) limitations of human activity in natural environments; and (4) pro ecological management. The authors point out that the category of green jobs can include those that support the preservation or rehabilitation of the environment in traditional sectors such as production and construction, or in new, emerging sectors such as renewable energy and energy efficiency [].
It is noteworthy that [] reveal the progress that has been made by the European Commission (2018) towards a broader definition, according to which a green job “deals directly with information, technologies or materials that preserve or restore the quality of the environment. This requires specialized skills, knowledge, training, or experience (for example, verifying compliance with environmental legislation, monitoring and streamlining the use of resources within the company, promoting, and selling green products and services)” []. In this context, green technological innovations seem to be essential for the creation of green jobs [].
The reviewed articles show that there is no uniformity in the definition of the concept, although some authors start from the same premises outlined in the joint report UNEP/ILO/IOE/ITUC from 2008. For example, in some papers [], green jobs can mean newly created jobs in the renewable energy sector or in some others studies [], there is identified the possibility of using a simplistic definition indicating the jobs in the environmental goods and services sector. Bassi and Guidolin have shown that the latter approach does not consider all those employees who use environmentally friendly processes and practices as it assumes that green jobs are synonymous with jobs specific to the circular economy, but that these employees may be defined in many ways []. Citing a report of the European Commission from 2015, the authors point out that green jobs include “all jobs that depend on the environment or are created, replaced or redefined in the process of transition to a greener economy” [].

5. Conclusions

Recently, the issue of the impact of climate change and the actions needed to combat its negative effects have become a topic of great interest to both researchers and policy makers. One of the tangible results of the academic, social, and political debates is the emergence of the Green Pact, a strategy aimed at sustainable growth, decoupled from the extensive use of resources, and leading to an increase in the quality of life of the individual while reducing the negative impact on the environment. The effective enactment of this strategy requires, among other things, a focus on the green jobs’ initiative, which aims to create decent jobs that contribute to maintaining and restoring the quality of the environment. Beginning from 2008 in particular, the topic of green jobs has attracted the attention of researchers, which has led to a diverse and relatively large number of studies. Following the assumption that, as a consequence, this can raise issues in the systematic identification of contributions to increasing knowledge, the main objective of this research was to analyze the scientific literature to identify definitions and approaches to the concept of “green jobs”, the terms associated with it, the areas of research interest in which the concept is frequently encountered, as well as the main theoretical and practical results obtained in the last five years in research on green jobs.
In the literature, there is currently no universally accepted definition of “green job” [], and the concept of “green job” seems to be in a state of permanent construction []. On the other hand, it seems that most authors choose to address the issue of green jobs starting from the definition given by an international body, such as the definition provided by the partnership between the Program United Nations Environment Program (UNEP), the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC), the International Organization of Employers (IOE) and the International Labor Organization (ILO). Although progress has been made in the broader definition of green jobs, the lack of a common definition may raise issues as to the exact highlighting of areas and the exact number of such jobs. In addition, the review of the literature reveals that the need to define the concept of “green jobs” is also linked to the desire to highlight the importance of green jobs and the issue of quantifying green jobs by field. The results of the review show that although there is no uniformity in the definition of the concept, there is, however, a convergence towards an initial acceptance of the 2008 UNEP/ILO/IOE/ITUC Report.
Using VOSViewer scientific software our analysis revealed that the term “green jobs” is most often associated with topics such as sustainable development, green economy, circular economy, welfare economy, European Green Pact, energy, renewable energy, economic development, and employment. In any case, the strongest connection is between “green jobs” and “sustainable development”, which highlights a common field and research interest. In addition, through sustainable development, the concept of “green jobs” relates to other concepts that have been hotly debated recently, such as: innovation, higher education, education for sustainable development or sustainable development goals.
It is also worth noting that the main results obtained in studies dedicated to green jobs were aimed at creating green jobs, work–life balance, analyzing the correlations between green business and green jobs or the role of local government in support of green jobs.
The current study provides relevant and promising results, but, on the other hand, focusing only on articles published in the last five years indexed in the Web of Science—Core Collection and Scopus databases—may be considered a limitation of the study since it excludes other academic databases. In this context, the study can be further extended by including papers published in other databases that may also cover the period before 2018.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.-R.S.-P., L.B., G.-L.Ș.-O., A.-T.Ș.-O., L.-G.F. and A.C.; methodology, M.-R.S.-P., L.B., G.-L.Ș.-O., A.-T.Ș.-O., L.-G.F. and A.C.; software, M.-R.S.-P., L.B., G.-L.Ș.-O., A.-T.Ș.-O., L.-G.F. and A.C.; validation, M.-R.S.-P., L.B., G.-L.Ș.-O., A.-T.Ș.-O., L.-G.F. and A.C.; formal analysis, M.-R.S.-P., L.B., G.-L.Ș.-O., A.-T.Ș.-O., L.-G.F. and A.C.; investigation, M.-R.S.-P., L.B., G.-L.Ș.-O., A.-T.Ș.-O., L.-G.F. and A.C.; resources, M.-R.S.-P., L.B., G.-L.Ș.-O., A.-T.Ș.-O., L.-G.F. and A.C.; data curation, M.-R.S.-P., L.B., G.-L.Ș.-O., A.-T.Ș.-O., L.-G.F. and A.C.; writing—original draft preparation, M.-R.S.-P., L.B., G.-L.Ș.-O., A.-T.Ș.-O., L.-G.F. and A.C.; writing—review and editing, M.-R.S.-P., L.B., G.-L.Ș.-O., A.-T.Ș.-O., L.-G.F. and A.C.; visualization, M.-R.S.-P., L.B., G.-L.Ș.-O., A.-T.Ș.-O., L.-G.F. and A.C.; supervision, M.-R.S.-P., L.B., G.-L.Ș.-O., A.-T.Ș.-O., L.-G.F. and A.C.; project administration, M.-R.S.-P., L.B., G.-L.Ș.-O., A.-T.Ș.-O., L.-G.F. and A.C.; funding acquisition, M.-R.S.-P., L.B., G.-L.Ș.-O., A.-T.Ș.-O., L.-G.F. and A.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. A European Green Deal. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en (accessed on 5 May 2022).
  2. UNEP. Green Jobs: Towards Decent Work in a Sustainable, Low-Carbon World; Full Report; UNEP/ILO/IOE/ITUC: Washington, DC, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  3. Rutkowska, M.; Sulich, A. Green Jobs on the Background of Industry 4.0. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2020, 176, 1231–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sulich, A.; Zema, T.; Zema, P. Green Entrepreneurship in the European Integration Context. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on European Integration, Ostrava, Czech Republic, 17–18 May 2018; pp. 1393–1400. [Google Scholar]
  5. Poplawski, L.; Rutkowska-Podołowska, M.; Sulich, A. Protected Areas and Green Jobs versus Environmental Goods and Services Sector—Competitive Analysis. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Environmental Science Technology CEST, Rhodes, Greece, 31 August–2 September 2017; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  6. Flash Eurobarometer 456: SMEs, Resource Efficiency and Green Markets—Data Europa EU. Available online: https://data.europa.eu/data/datasets/s2151_456_eng?locale=en (accessed on 5 May 2022).
  7. Colijn, B. Green Jobs in Europe and the Increasing Demand for Technical Skills. Neujobs Working Paper No. 4.2. 2014. Available online: https://www.transition-europe.eu/fr/publication/green-jobs-europe-and-increasing-demand-technical-skills (accessed on 20 June 2022).
  8. Xiao, Y.; Watson, M. Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review. J. Plan. Educ. Res. 2019, 39, 93–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mensah, J. Sustainable Development: Meaning, History, Principles, Pillars, and Implications for Human Action: Literature Review. Cogent Soc. Sci. 2019, 5, 1653531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ali, M. A Systematic Literature Review of Sustainable Entrepreneurship with Thematic Analysis. World J. Entrep. Manag. Sustain. Dev. 2021, 17, 742–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Takalo, S.K.; Tooranloo, H.S.; Parizi, S.Z. Green Innovation: A Systematic Literature Review. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 279, 122474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ruggerio, C.A. Sustainability and Sustainable Development: A Review of Principles and Definitions. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 786, 147481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yong, J.Y.; Yusliza, M.-Y.; Fawehinmi, O.O. Green Human Resource Management: A Systematic Literature Review from 2007 to 2019. Benchmarking Int. J. 2019, 27, 2005–2027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Boyle, F.; Sherman, D. ScopusTM: The Product and Its Development. Ser. Libr. 2006, 49, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chadegani, A.A.; Salehi, H.; Yunus, M.M.; Farhadi, H.; Fooladi, M.; Farhadi, M.; Ebrahim, N.A. A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases. ASS 2013, 9, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Darmandieu, A.; Garcés-Ayerbe, C.; Renucci, A.; Rivera-Torres, P. How Does It Pay to Be Circular in Production Processes? Eco-Innovativeness and Green Jobs as Moderators of a Cost-Efficiency Advantage in European Small and Medium Enterprises. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2022, 31, 1184–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, C.; Yao, Y.; Zhu, H. Hybrid Salp Swarm Algorithm for Solving the Green Scheduling Problem in a Double-Flexible Job Shop. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sulich, A.; Sołoducho-Pelc, L. The Circular Economy and the Green Jobs Creation. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 14231–14247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Arnedo, E.G.; Valero-Matas, J.A.; Sánchez-Bayón, A. Spanish Tourist Sector Sustainability: Recovery Plan, Green Jobs and Wellbeing Opportunity. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bassi, F.; Guidolin, M. Resource Efficiency and Circular Economy in European SMEs: Investigating the Role of Green Jobs and Skills. Sustainability 2021, 13, 12136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dell’Anna, F. Green Jobs and Energy Efficiency as Strategies for Economic Growth and the Reduction of Environmental Impacts. Energy Policy 2021, 149, 112031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Vaquero, G.M.; Sánchez-Bayón, A.; Lominchar, J. European Green Deal and Recovery Plan: Green Jobs, Skills and Wellbeing Economics in Spain. Energies 2021, 14, 4145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Iddagoda, A.; Hysa, E.; Bulińska-Stangrecka, H.; Manta, O. Green Work-Life Balance and Greenwashing the Construct of Work-Life Balance: Myth and Reality. Energies 2021, 14, 4556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Martínez-Cruz, A.L.; Núñez, H.M. Tension in Mexico’s Energy Transition: Are Urban Residential Consumers in Aguascalientes Willing to Pay for Renewable Energy and Green Jobs? Energy Policy 2021, 150, 112145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Moreno-Mondéjar, L.; Triguero, Á.; Cuerva, M.C. Exploring the Association between Circular Economy Strategies and Green Jobs in European Companies. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 297, 113437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Song, K.; Kim, H.; Cha, J.; Lee, T. Matching and Mismatching of Green Jobs: A Big Data Analysis of Job Recruiting and Searching. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Vesere, R.; Kalnins, S.N.; Blumberga, D. Role of Green Jobs in the Reduction of Waste and Waste Management. Environ. Clim. Technol. 2021, 25, 1128–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sulich, A.; Rutkowska, M.; Popławski, Ł. Green Jobs, Definitional Issues, and the Employment of Young People: An Analysis of Three European Union Countries. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 262, 110314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Ismail, A.; Sumarwati, S.; Abd Samad, N.; Kasman, Z.; Yunus, F.A.N. The development of job competency for skilled technical worker towards green technology. Geomate J. 2019, 17, 216–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lee, T.; van der Heijden, J. Does the Knowledge Economy Advance the Green Economy? An Evaluation of Green Jobs in the 100 Largest Metropolitan Regions in the United States. Energy Environ. 2019, 30, 141–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Luca, F.-A.; Epuran, G.; Ciobanu, C.-I.; Horodnic, A.V. Green Jobs Creation—Main Element in the Implementation of Bioeconomic Mechanisms. Amfiteatru Econ. 2019, 21, 60–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rodríguez, J.L. The Promotion of Both Decent and Green Jobs through Cooperatives. Boletín Asoc. Int. Derecho Coop. 2019, 54, 115–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Unay-Gailhard, İ.; Bojnec, Š. The Impact of Green Economy Measures on Rural Employment: Green Jobs in Farms. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 208, 541–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Battaglia, M.; Cerrini, E.; Annesi, N. Can Environmental Agreements Represent an Opportunity for Green Jobs? Evidence from Two Italian Experiences. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 175, 257–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Otieno, B.; Ochieng, A. Green Economy in the Wastewater Treatment Sector: Jobs, Awareness, Barriers, and Opportunities in Selected Local Governments in South Africa. J. Energy South. Afr. 2018, 29, 50–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sulich, A.; Zema, T. Green Jobs, a New Measure of Public Management and Sustainable Development. Eur. J. Environ. Sci. 2018, 8, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Afolabi, A.O.; Ojelabi, R.A.; Tunji-Olayeni, P.F.; Fagbenle, O.I.; Mosaku, T.O. Survey Datasets on Women Participation in Green Jobs in the Construction Industry. Data Brief 2018, 17, 856–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Hess, D.J.; Mai, Q.D.; Skaggs, R.; Sudibjo, M. Local Matters: Political Opportunities, Spatial Scale, and Support for Green Jobs Policies. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 2018, 26, 158–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Traversi, D.; Gorrasi, I.; Pignata, C.; Degan, R.; Anedda, E.; Carletto, G.; Vercellino, G.; Fornasero, S.; Bertino, A.; Filippi, F.; et al. Aerosol Exposure and Risk Assessment for Green Jobs Involved in Biomethanization. Environ. Int. 2018, 114, 202–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Bowen, A.; Kuralbayeva, K.; Tipoe, E.L. Characterising Green Employment: The Impacts of ‘Greening’ on Workforce Composition. Energy Economics 2018, 72, 263–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Are ‘Green’ Jobs Good Jobs? How Lessons from the Experience to-Date Can Inform Labour Market Transitions of the Future—Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment. Available online: https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/publication/are-green-jobs-good-jobs-how-lessons-from-the-experience-to-date-can-inform-labour-market-transitions-of-the-future/ (accessed on 7 February 2022).
  42. Van der Ree, K. Promoting Green Jobs: Decent Work in the Transition to Low-Carbon, Green Economies. Int. Dev. Policy 2019, 11, 248–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.