Next Article in Journal
Socio-Demographic Composition and Potential Occupational Exposure to SARS-CoV2 under Routine Working Conditions among Key Workers in France
Next Article in Special Issue
Economic Freedom, Education and CO2 Emissions: A Causality Analysis for EU Member States
Previous Article in Journal
Precise Supervision of Enterprise Environmental Protection Behavior Based on Boolean Matrix Factorization under Low Carbon Background
Previous Article in Special Issue
Analysis of the Dilemma of Promoting Circular Logistics Packaging in China: A Stochastic Evolutionary Game-Based Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Profile of Bacterial Community and Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Typical Vegetable Greenhouse Soil

1
Institute of Agricultural Standards and Testing Technology for Agri-Products, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences & Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Test Technology on Food Quality and Safety, Jinan 250100, China
2
Shandong Provincial Land Surveying and Planning Institute, Jinan 250014, China
3
Resources and Environment Innovation Institute, School of Municipal and Environmental Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(13), 7742; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137742
Submission received: 20 May 2022 / Revised: 21 June 2022 / Accepted: 22 June 2022 / Published: 24 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Circular Economy and Green Environment)

Abstract

:
The use of vegetable greenhouse production systems has increased rapidly because of the increasing demand for food materials. The vegetable greenhouse production industry is confronted with serious environmental problems, due to their high agrochemical inputs and intensive utilization. Besides this, antibiotic-resistant bacteria, carrying antibiotic-resistance genes (ARGs), may enter into a vegetable greenhouse with the application of animal manure. Bacterial communities and ARGs were investigated in two typical vegetable-greenhouse-using counties with long histories of vegetable cultivation. The results showed that Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Acidobacteria, Chloroflexi, and Gemmatimonadetes were the dominant phyla, while aadA, tetL, sul1, and sul2 were the most common ARGs in greenhouse vegetable soil. Heatmap and principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) demonstrated that the differences between two counties were more significant than those among soils with different cultivation histories in the same county, suggesting that more effects on bacterial communities and ARGs were caused by soil type and manure type than by the accumulation of cultivation years. The positive correlation between the abundance of the intI gene with specific ARGs highlights the horizontal transfer potential of these ARGs. A total of 11 phyla were identified as the potential hosts of specific ARGs. Based on redundancy analysis (RDA), Ni and pH were the most potent factors determining the bacterial communities, and Cr was the top factor affecting the relative abundance of the ARGs. These results might be helpful in drawing more attention to the risk of manure recycling in the vegetable greenhouse, and further developing a strategy for practical manure application and sustainable production of vegetable greenhouses.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Soil microorganisms, one of the key parts of the soil ecosystem, play important roles in nutrient cycling and fertility maintenance, such as by regulating levels of C, N, and P [1]. Soil bacterial communities contribute to the health of flora and fauna directly or indirectly in terrestrial ecosystems. The abundance and diversity of soil bacterial communities are widely used as effective indicators of soil health because of their high sensitivity to environmental factors and soil nutrient status [2,3]. Antibiotic-resistant bacteria and their antibiotic-resistance genes (ARGs) are regarded as one of the most significant emerging contaminants, due to their threats to environmental ecosystems and public health [4,5]. Multiple antibiotic-resistant bacteria and ARGs have been reported in various environments, including lake [6], river [7,8], pasture [9], agriculture [10], and air [11] environments. Soil is a major reservoir and sink of both antibiotics and ARGs. Except for intrinsic resistance, one of the sources of ARGs in soil has been a large amount of antibiotic input through manure fertilization, which is a common method of promoting soil fertility and nutrients for plant growth. Antibiotics have been reported as a driver of ARG enrichment, because the selection pressure on soil bacteria by metabolic changes and the enzyme activity of microorganisms produce ARGs [12]. Besides this, ARGs can be disseminated into plant root and leaf endophytes from manure-fertilized soil [13,14]. Soil–microbe–animal–plant systems became a vital nexus that could influence human health via direct/indirect connection. Therefore, ARGs in soil, particularly in manure-fertilized soil compartments, have become an increasing hotspot globally.
In addition, environmental factors (heavy metals and physicochemical properties) contribute to bacterial communities and ARGs. Heavy metal, even in low concentrations, can accelerate the evolution and spread of ARGs in environments through coresistance and/or cross-resistance by rebuilding the structure of microbial community [15,16]. For example, the majority of bacteria are significantly positively correlated with As, Cd, Cr, Ni, and Pb, while being negatively correlated with Cu, Mn, and Zn in chicken-manure-fertilized soil [17]. Cu, Zn, and Pb are significantly positively correlated with ARGs after 30 years of swine manure exposure in agricultural soil [18]. As and Cd were found to be the predominant factors shaping the distribution patterns of ARGs in paddy soils, by affecting the bacterial abundance [19]. Organic matter (OM) is one of the top soil properties affecting ARGs, and is negatively correlated with the abundance of ARGs. The soil pH and Zn content are the biggest contributors to the distribution pattern of ARGs in cinnamon soils [20].
The Chinese greenhouse vegetable production system has been boosted more than eight-fold from 1990 to 2014, making China the world’s main greenhouse vegetable producer [21]. Environment factors inside the greenhouse, including irrigation, temperature, humanity, etc., are significantly different from those in open fields. Additionally, increasing evidence has confirmed the presence of soil pollution and deterioration of soil quality, caused by frequent organic and chemical fertilizer, pesticide, and fungicide applications in greenhouses [22]. The concentration of antibiotics in greenhouse soils is also higher than that in open-field soils [23]. All the above factors probably would affect the profile of bacterial communities and ARGs in soil. Therefore, more attention should be paid to bacterial communities and ARGs in greenhouses and their potential risks to food safety.
An increasing number of studies have focused on bacterial communities and ARGs in vegetable greenhouses. One study predicted that soil microbial communities are influenced by heavy metal pollution in greenhouses, which was investigated through 16s rRNA sequences analysis [22]. Abundances of tetW, tetO, sul1, and sul2 were significantly increased in manure-amended greenhouse soil [24]. Another study found no significant difference of ARGs in soil amended with different types of manure, whereas the diversity and abundance of ARGs were elevated in fertilized soil [25]. The bacterial communities and ARGs, and their relationships with environmental factors, are still relatively limited, particularly in greenhouses with long histories of over 15 years. Shandong is a main greenhouse cultivation province, and counts for half of the vegetable cultivation area in China [24]. Shouguang, in Shandong province, has the largest vegetable production industry and wholesale market in China. Anqiu, another city with high vegetable production, is famous for its export of vegetables. Both of them have long histories of manure application into greenhouses. Here, soils from two typical greenhouse production counties with long-term manure-application histories were selected to investigate (1) the profile of bacterial communities, ARGs, and integron–integrase (intI) genes in vegetable greenhouse soils; (2) the relationships of bacterial communities, ARGs, and intI genes with physicochemical properties and heavy metals; (3) the potential bacterial hosts harboring ARGs and intI genes. The results will be helpful in gaining a deeper understanding of the bacterial communities and ARGs in long-term greenhouse cultivation with manure applications, and in providing scientific support to make a strategy for practical manure application and sustainable production of vegetable greenhouses.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling Sites and Soil Sampling

Sampling sites were located in two counties, Shouguang (SG) (118°76′ N, 36°77′ E) and Anqiu (AQ) (119°32′ N, 36°22′ E), Shandong province. Samples of six vegetable greenhouse soils, classified as cinnamon soil, were collected in SG within a range of 600 m. These sites have had continuous vegetable greenhouse cultivation with manure application for 3 years (SG1), 5 years (SG2), 7 years (SG3), 10 years (SG4), 15 years (SG5), and 17 years (SG6). The vegetable planted was eggplant. Poultry manure was used as a base fertilizer annually. The cropping period was from August to June the next year. Samples of five vegetable greenhouse soils classified as fluvo-aquic soil were collected in AQ within a range of 300 m. These sites have had continuous vegetable greenhouse cultivation with manure application for 3 years (AQ1), 7 years (AQ2), 10 years (AQ3), 14 years (AQ4), and 16 years (AQ5). The crops planted were cucumber and tomato. Swine manure and cattle manure were used as base fertilizers annually. The cropping period was from October to the following June.
Soil samples were taken at the beginning of June. The area of each greenhouse was about 1300 m2. In each greenhouse, three plots were separated as replicated. Within each plot, ten subsamples were collected from the topsoil (around 0–20 cm) and then mixed thoroughly to obtain uniform representativeness. The soil was placed in sterile plastic bags and immediately transported in a cooling box with ice. In the laboratory, a portion of soil was stored at −80 °C for molecular analysis for ARGs, intI genes, and bacterial communities. A portion of soil was air-dried and sieved to smaller than 200 μm particles for physicochemical property and heavy metal determination. A portion of soil was freeze-dried under vacuum (48~72 h) and sieved through a 0.42 mm mesh for antibiotic determination.

2.2. DNA Extraction

FastDNA®SPIN Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA, USA) was used to extract the total DNA from the soil [18]. A NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to examine the concentration and quality of the DNA. The qualified DNA was stored at −80 °C until analysis.

2.3. Illumina High-Throughput Sequencing

The soil bacterial 16S rRNA gene (V3-V4 hypervariable region) was amplified using the primer sets of 338F/806R (5′-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCA-3′; 5′-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′). The PCR reactions and conditions were performed as described by the previous study [26]. Purified and pooled PCR products were then pyrosequenced using the Illumina Hiseq 2500 platform (Biomarker Technologies Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). Raw Illumina fastq files were merged by Flash software (version 1.2.11) to obtain raw tags, and then were filtered by Trimmomatic software (version 0.33). Chimeric sequences were removed by UCHIME (version 8.1), and high-quality tags were obtained. The remaining sequences were then clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) with similarity of ≥97% by employing USEARCH (version 10.0). OTU taxonomy classification was performed for each phylotype by using the RDP classifier based on the SILVA database (http://www.arb-silva.de (accessed on 27 September 2020) [27].

2.4. qPCR of ARGs and intI Genes

We employed qPCRs to determine the abundances of 18 selected genes. The information and details of primers, annealing temperature, and amplification size were listed in Table S1. Each qPCR was conducted on a Lightcycler 480 II (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). The 20 μL qPCR reaction mixture consisted of 10 μL of SYBR Premix Ex TaqTM Kit (TaKaRa, Shiga, Japan), 0.2 μL of each primer (20 µM), 2.0 μL of template DNA, and 7.6 μL of RNA-free water. Melting curve analysis was added at the end of each qPCR run to confirm the specificity of the amplification. We used 10-fold serial dilutions of extracted plasmids carrying the selected genes as standards for qPCR quantification according to the details of the previous study [18]. The copies of 16S-rRNA were determined to calculate the relative abundance of ARGs, which could be used to normalize the ARGs and intI genes abundance to the total bacterial DNA [7].

2.5. Determination of Physicochemical Properties and Heavy Metal Concentration

Soil pH was determined by pH meter after suspension of soil-to-water (Wsoil/Vdeionized water = 1:2.5). Soil organic matter (OM) was determined after oxidation of potassium dichromate–sulfuric acid solution. A total of eight typical heavy metals were digested using HNO3-HCl-HClO4. The concentrations of Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn were measured by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). The concentration of As and Hg were measured by atomic fluorescence spectrometry (AFS) [28].

2.6. Determination of Antibiotics

A total of 17 antibiotics were analyzed in this study, including amoxicillin, ampicillin, cefoxitin, ceftiofur, chloramphenicol, florfenicol, flupenicolamine, gentamicin, streptomycin, sulfisoxazole, sulfamethoxazole, sulfadimidine, tetracycline, oxytetracycline, chlorotetracycline, doxycycline, and trimethoprim. The determinations of the 17 antibiotics were conducted as described in the study [29]. Briefly, the antibiotics in the soil were extracted using a buffer of methanol: acetonitrile: citrate (1:1:2). The extracted solutions were then purified and concentrated using Oasis HLB cartridges. After nitrogen-drying and concentrating, the final extracts were measured by an ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) system.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

The microbial α diversity index was calculated using Mothur (version 1.30). Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) and variation partitioning analysis (VPA) were performed using the R package ‘vegan’. The redundancy analysis (RDA) was performed using Canoco5. Network analysis was drawn using Gephi (version 0.9.2) based on Spearman’s correlation analysis (p < 0.05).

3. Results

3.1. Characterization of Bacterial Community

As shown in Figure 1, the result of high-throughput sequencing of soil bacterial 16S rRNA genes revealed that the dominant bacterial phylum in AQ was Proteobacteria (around 0.311–0.376), followed by Firmicutes (around 0.087–0.287), Acidobacteria (around 0.113–0.191), Chloroflexi (around 0.045–0.089), Gemmatimonadetes (around 0.054–0.078) and Actinobacteria (around 0.057–0.097). In SG, the dominant bacterial phyla were Proteobacteria (around 0.236–0.295) and Firmicutes (around 0.154–0.299), then followed by Acidobacteria (around 0.122–0.198), Chloroflexi (around 0.094–0.166), Gemmatimonadetes (around 0.062–0.149). Generally, the abundances of Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria in AQ were higher than those in SG. On the contrary, the abundance of Chloroflexi in AQ was lower than that in SG. A heatmap of the bacterial communities showed the detailed differences at phylum level (Figure 2A). PCoA of the bacterial communities showed that there were more differences between two counties than between sites in the same county (Figure 2B).
A α diversity index including ACE, Chao1, Simpson, and Shannon demonstrated irregular changes both in AQ and SG (Table S2). For ACE, Chao1, and Simpson, no significant difference was found between AQ and SG. Shannon in AQ was significantly higher than that in SG (p = 0.012), which indicated that bacterial community diversity in AQ was higher than that in SG.

3.2. Abundances of ARGs and intI Gene

Relative abundances of 14 ARGs detected in different greenhouse soils are shown in Figure 3. The relative abundances of aadA were the highest among all the 14 ARGs, and the values ranged from around 0.033–0.073. The next-most-abundant ARGs were tetL, sul1, and sul2. The four ARGs abovementioned were identified as the dominant genes, which accounted for around 87.91–94.34% of the total ARGs. The remaining 10 ARGs detected were in relatively much lower quantities. In AQ, the highest total relative abundance was found in AQ3, while the lowest was in AQ2. In SG, the highest total relative abundance was found in SG1, while the lowest was in SG4. These indicated that abundance of ARGs was not increased with the cultivation time increase. Generally, total relative abundance of ARGs in SG soils was higher than that in AQ soils, except for in AQ3. Heatmap results showed the difference among the treatments (Figure 4A). Furthermore, PCoA analysis showed that there were more differences between soils of two counties than among soils of different cultivation histories in the same county (Figure 4B). These indicated that ARGs were affected by soil type and manure type more than by accumulation of manure application time.
Two intI genes, intI1 and intI2, were also investigated to measure the horizontal transfer potential of ARGs. Figure S1 showed that the relative abundance of intI1 was significantly higher than that of intI2. The total abundance of the intI gene ranged from 6.79−4 to 7.80−3. The highest abundance of intI in AQ was found in AQ3, and the lowest was in AQ5. In SG, the highest abundance of intI was found in SG2, and the lowest was in SG1. These also indicated that the intI genes were not accumulated as the year of vegetable cultivation passed.
Network analysis showed that correlation among ARGs was detected. For example, cmlA was found to be positively correlated with aadA2, and both of them were positively correlated with sul1, sul2, and tetG. Additionally, the abundance of intI1 was positively correlated with cmlA, aadA2, sul1, sul2, tetC, tetG, and tetL, and the abundance of intI2 was positively correlated with strA, strB (Figure 5A), which confirmed the horizontal transfer potential of these ARGs.
According to Figure 5B, 11 phyla were revealed that were totally positively correlated with ARGs, indicating that these phyla might be the potential hosts of specific ARGs. For example, positive correlations of Gemmatimonadetes with cmlA, sul1, and sul2, Chloroflexi with sul1 and tetM, Proteobacteria with tetB(P), and Firmicutes with tetA were found respectively. Actinobacteria, Deinococcus-Thermus, Dependentiae, Hydrogenedentes, Tenericutes, FBP, and Spirochaetes were also positively correlated with individual ARGs, though their abundances were relatively low. More attention should be paid to the positive correlation of intI1 and Gemmatimonadetes.

3.3. Factors Influencing ARGs and Bacterial Community

Physicochemical properties and heavy metal concentrations in different vegetable greenhouse soils are shown in Table S1. Only doxycycline was detected in soil from SG1, with the value of 12.69 µg∙kg−1. Therefore, physicochemical properties and heavy metal concentrations were used to further RDA analysis. RDA results are shown in Figure 6, which were used to assess the relationships among environmental parameters and bacterial communities (at phylum level). RDA1 and RDA2 could explain 33.45% and 23.11% of bacterial communities respectively. As demonstrated by the lengths of the variables in RDA, Ni and pH were the strongest environmental factors determining the overall bacterial communities. The contribution of effect of Ni on bacterial communities was 30.6%, which was followed by pH, Cd, OM, Cu, Zn, and As with the contribution of 17.7%, 13.5%, 12.1%, 7.9%, 6.5%, and 4.9%, respectively (Table 1). Ni, as well as Cr and Pb, were positively correlated with the dominant phylum Proteobacteria, whereas they were negatively correlated with the second dominant phylum Fimicutes and the fourth dominant phylum Chloroflexi. Soil pH was found have a positive correlation with the third dominant phylum, Acidobacteria.
As shown in Figure 7 and Table 1, RDA1 and RDA2 could in total explain 65.07% of the ARG profile, with 39.02% and 26.05% respectively, which meant that physicochemical properties and heavy metal concentrations could mostly determine the existence of ARGs. Among the factors, Cr was the top factor affecting the relative abundance of ARGs with a contribution of 29.2%, which was followed by Cu, Cd, OM, pH, Ni, and Zn with contributions of 12.2%, 12.4%, 11.7%, 10.3%, 8.0%, and 7.6%, respectively. Cr, as well as Ni, Pb, Cu, As, and organic matter, were positively correlated with tetB(P), while they were negatively correlated with most of the ARGs detected, including cmlA, aadA, aadA2, sul1, sul2, tetA, tetL, and tetM. The effect of pH was just the opposite.

4. Discussion

4.1. Bacterial Community and Correlation with ARGs

Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Acidobacteria, Chloroflexi, and Gemmatimonadetes were the main phyla found, which was similar to other reports on vegetable greenhouse soils [30]. However, the sequence of the relative abundance of these phyla in soil from different places was a little different. Proteobacteria might be simulated by the input of large amounts of organic and chemical fertilizer in greenhouses, because it was favored by conditions with high nutrient and carbon content [31]. There were more differences in bacterial communities between two counties than between different numbers of vegetable cultivation years. It is noted that the tendencies of effects on bacterial communities were similar to the results of the ARGs. This might be due to the factors affecting ARGs via changing various ecological niches for different bacterial populations, which result in the shift of microbial communities [32]. There was a study that showed that long-term greenhouse cultivation had no effects on microbial diversity [33], while another study found that microbial communities were significantly affected by greenhouse cultivation years [34]. Our study found that the abundance and diversities were significantly different, with no regular changes along with the increase of vegetable cultivation years.

4.2. Abundances of ARGs and intI Gene

Aminoglycoside ARGs were reported to be the most important ARGs in agricultural soil amended with animal manure [20,35]. The aadA gene encoding aminoglycoside nucleoside transferase was found to be the predominant ARG among all the ARGs in this study. Additionally, aadA2, another aminoglycoside nucleotide transferase gene, and two aminoglycoside phosphotransferase genes (strA and strB) found in this study further confirmed the prevalence of aminoglycoside ARGs. The widely usage of aminoglycoside antibiotics in animal husbandry since the late 1950s [7] might be responsible for the high level of microbial resistance [35] and harboring of ARGs against aminoglycoside [20]. The integrons having aadA or variant of aadA were located on either chromosomes or plasmids [36], which increases the future risk by wide dissemination. The gene tetL, encoding an efflux pump against tetracycline antibiotic, was much more abundant than other tet genes, which is consistent with previous reports in agricultural soils with long-term manure application [37]. Considering that a considerably higher abundance of tetL gene was detected in organic manure [38], and tetL-carrying plasmids (pBSDMV46A, pSU1, and pDMV2) persisted [39], the high prevalence and robust adaptability of tetL in manure-amended soil was reasonable. Two plasmid-borne sulfonamide ARGs (sul1, sul2), encoding the dihydropteroate synthase enzymes, were also dominant genes in vegetable greenhouse soil. The genes sul1 and sul2 were observed to occur together frequently [40], because sul2 is essentially one of the variants of the sul1 gene. However, sul1 is often located in integrin gene cassettes, while sul2 is commonly located in small IncQ family plasmid, which means that different abundances exist in different soil environments [41].
There was no regular change or continuous proliferation of ARGs along with repeating annual application of animal manure. Previous studies found similar results, showing that the abundance of ARGs increased irregularly with the years of manure application increase [20,24]. However, the elevation abundance of ARGs by manure exposure disappeared gradually within a crop-growing season due to the resilience capacity of soil [42]. Actually, the ARGs profile was a comprehensive result of several behaviors, including prevention by indigenous microorganisms of the invasion from fecal microorganisms [43], horizontal gene dissemination from fecal bacteria to indigenous bacteria [36], and stability of extracellular ARGs [44]. The levels of diversity and relative abundance of ARGs in the cinnamon soils were lower than those in the saline–alkali and fluvo-aquic soils in vegetable greenhouse [20]. Cattle manure and swine manure contained different diversities and abundances of ARGs [18]. Significantly different abundances of ARGs among cattle manure, swine manure, and poultry manure, and further ARGs in the soils amended with different types of animal manure, were observed [45]. Thus, the differences in ARGs between two counties observed in this study could be attributed to soil type and manure type. Additionally, the transport and persistence of ARGs also might be influenced by crop planting and harvest.
Integron was composed of the intI gene and genes conferring resistance, connected by a variable region wherein one or more gene cassettes could be inserted [46]. Previous studies suggested that the intI gene be regarded as an indicator to evaluate the capacity of horizontal gene transfer through acquiring and disseminating ARGs [41]. Most integrons in the environment were of the class 1 type [46]. It was verified that the relative abundance of intI1 was significantly higher than that of intI2 by this study and the previous study in greenhouses [24]. Positive correlation of intI1 with cmlA, aadA2, sul1, sul2, tetC, tetG, and tetL suggested horizontal gene transfer of these ARGs among microorganisms. This was also involved in multiple resistances, because the 3′-conserved segment of intI1 gene cassette, where sul1 is located, was detected in some other genes [46]. A large conjugative plasmid with ANT(2″)Ia-aadA2 cassette located on class 1 integron [36] could also explain the positively correlation between intI1 and aadA2 in this study. In this study, the positive correlations among ARGs, such as cmlA with aadA2, and both of the above with sul1, sul2, and tetG, suggested that ARGs have some potential interactions, although they have encoded resistance to different types of antibiotics.

4.3. Potential Hosts of ARGs and intI Gene

The changes in bacterial community demonstrated essential roles in the evolution of ARGs by determining their potential hosts [47]. Network analysis indicated that 11 bacterial phyla might be the potential hosts of specific ARGs. For example, Gemmatimonadetes was the potential host of cmlA, sul1, and sul2; Chloroflexi was the potential host of sul1 and tetM. It is interesting that although abundances of Hydrogenedentes, Tenericutes, and Spirochaetes were low, these were the potential hosts of tetL (the most abundant tet gene). However, previous study based on media culture found that almost all the identified tetracycline-resistant bacteria isolates carrying tetL belonged to Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, and Proteobacteria [38]. This might be because the methods used were different. Most of the soil bacteria are still unculturable, and only a few of the hosts were verified based on current media culture [9]. It was noted that Gemmatimonadetes was the potential host of intI, as well as, cmlA, sul1, and sul2, which suggested that horizontal gene transfer of cmlA, sul1, and sul2 is carried by Gemmatimonadetes.

4.4. Contributions of Factors to Bacterial Community and ARGs

The dissemination and stability of ARGs in soil were affected not only by the selection pressure of antibiotics, but by the abiotic factors, including soil pH, organic matter, soil moisture, temperature, heavy metal, and micro/macro nutrient availability [48,49]. In this study, antibiotics, as well as soil pH, organic matter, and heavy metals were investigated. However, none of the 17 selected antibiotics were detected in any of the greenhouse soils except for doxycycline in soil from SG1. The persistence of antibiotics in the terrestrial environment was various, ranging from several hours to weeks or even months [23]. Thus, antibiotics were mostly degraded or biotransformed, because the sampling was conducted almost at the end of the cropping period, which was almost 9 months after manure application. In the meanwhile, diverse and abundant ARGs were discovered in all samples, even in the soil absent of antibiotics, implying that the presence of antibiotics is not be a precondition of the occurrence and persistence of ARGs/antibiotic-resistant bacteria in soil. Similarly, several studies found the common occurrence of ARGs in soil, even though no antibiotics were detected [50,51]. Further attention should be paid to the mechanisms behind the persistence of ARGs in soil with no antibiotic selection pressure, which may contribute to the further problem of the dissemination of resistance to antibiotics.
A significant proportion of bacterial community variation was explained by metals and pH value in farmland [52]. The heavy metal may cause a shift in the bacteria composition. Significant positive correlations were detected between microbial communities and heavy metals (Cr, Cu, Ni, and Zn) [53]. Additionally, pH and heavy metals have comprehensive effects on bacterial communities [54]. A relatively low pH increased the bioavailability of heavy metal and micro/macro nutrient availability, and exerted strong selective pressure on microorganisms [55,56]. This could explain why pH was one of the strongest environmental factors determining the overall bacterial communities in this study. Heavy metals promoted conjugative transfer of ARGs between microorganism strains [15], and enhanced the coselection of ARGs and metal resistance genes in soils with high heavy-metal contents [16]. However, the concentration of Cr, as well as Ni, Pb, Cu, As, were negatively correlated with most of the ARGs, including cmlA, aadA, aadA2, sul1, sul2, tetA, tetL, and tetM in this study, suggesting that the selective pressure of these heavy metals on ARGs at low concentrations should be taken seriously, rather than be ignored. Ni, as well as Cr and Pb, were positively correlated with tetB(P). At the meantime, Ni, Cr, and Pb were positively correlated with Proteobacteria, while Proteobacteria was positively correlated with tetB(P). Thus, factors, such as Ni, Cr, and Pb affected the distribution of ARGs not only by themselves, but by affecting the structures of bacterial communities.

5. Conclusions

In summary, this study provided a useful insight of the profiles of bacterial communities and ARGs in vegetable greenhouse soils with different manure-application years and locations. The dominant bacterial phyla were Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Acidobacteria, Chloroflexi, and Gemmatimonadetes, and the most abundant ARGs were aadA, tetL, sul1, and sul2 in greenhouse vegetable soil. The positive correlation between the intI1 gene with cmlA, aadA2, sul1, sul2, tetC, tetG, tetL, as well as that between intI2 with strA, strB, highlights the horizontal transfer potential of these ARGs. The changes in bacterial community play essential roles in the evolution of ARGs by determining their potential hosts. Ni and pH were the most potent factors determining the bacterial communities, and Cr was the top factor affecting ARGs. Further study on the characterization of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, as much as possible, and a metagenomic survey should be carried out to elucidate the mechanisms behind the occurrence and persistence of ARGs in soil in special microclimate environments, such as vegetable greenhouses.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijerph19137742/s1, Figure S1: Relative abundances of intI genes in greenhouse soil; Table S1: Primers employed for qPCR; Table S2: The microbial α diversity index in vegetable greenhouse soil; Table S3: Physicochemical properties and heavy metal concentrations in vegetable greenhouse soil. Reference [57] is cited in the supplementary materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.Y. and Y.Z.; methodology, X.Y.; software, X.Y. and Y.Z.; formal analysis, W.W. and L.F.; investigation, X.Y. and Y.W.; writing—original draft preparation, X.Y., Y.Z. and C.S.; writing—review and editing, X.Y.; visualization, X.Y. and C.S.; supervision, X.Y.; funding acquisition, X.Y. and B.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant numbers 41907030, and the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, grant numbers ZR2020ME236.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, L.; Li, T.; Meng, H.; Xie, Y.; Zhang, J.; Hong, J. Effects of seven-year fertilization reclamation on bacterial community in a coal mining subsidence area in Shanxi, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 12504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wang, C.N.; Wu, R.L.; Li, Y.Y.; Qin, Y.F.; Li, Y.L.; Meng, F.Q.; Wang, L.G.; Xu, F.L. Effects of pesticide residues on bacterial community diversity and structure in typical greenhouse soils with increasing cultivation years in Northern China. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 710, 136321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Vandenkoornhuyse, P.; Quaiser, A.; Duhamel, M.; Le Van, A.; Dufresne, A. The importance of the microbiome of the plant holobiont. New Phytol. 2015, 206, 1196–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Feng, G.; Huang, H.; Chen, Y. Effects of emerging pollutants on the occurrence and transfer of antibiotic resistance genes: A review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 420, 126602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Koch, N.; Islam, N.F.; Sonowal, S.; Prasad, R.; Sarma, H. Environmental antibiotics and resistance genes as emerging contaminants: Methods of detection and bioremediation. Curr. Res. Microb. Sci. 2021, 2, 100027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Yang, Y.; Song, W.; Lin, H.; Wang, W.; Du, L.; Xing, W. Antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes in global lakes: A review and meta-analysis. Environ. Int. 2018, 116, 60–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Wang, X.; Gu, J.; Gao, H.; Qian, X.; Li, H. Abundances of clinically relevant antibiotic resistance genes and bacterial community diversity in the Weihe river, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Sánchez-Baena, A.M.; Caicedo-Bejarano, L.D.; Chávez-Vivas, M. Structure of Bacterial Community with Resistance to Antibiotics in Aquatic Environments. A Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 2348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, Z.; Zhang, W.; Yang, L.; Stedtfeld, R.D.; Peng, A.; Gu, C.; Boyd, S.A.; Li, H. Antibiotic resistance genes and bacterial communities in cornfield and pasture soils receiving swine and dairy manures. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 248, 947–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kaviani Rad, A.; Astaykina, A.; Streletskii, R.; Afsharyzad, Y.; Etesami, H.; Zarei, M.; Balasundram, S.K. An overview of antibiotic resistance and abiotic stresses affecting antimicrobial resistance in agricultural soils. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 4666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yang, Y.; Zhou, R.; Chen, B.; Zhang, T.; Hu, L.; Zou, S. Characterization of airborne antibiotic resistance genes from typical bioaerosol emission sources in the urban environment using metagenomic approach. Chemosphere 2018, 213, 463–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; Sun, Y.; Xia, S.; Zhao, J. Effects of coexistence of tetracycline, copper and microplastics on the fate of antibiotic resistance genes in manured soil. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 790, 148087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wang, F.; Sun, R.; Hu, H.; Duan, G.; Meng, L.; Qiao, M. The overlap of soil and vegetable microbes drives the transfer of antibiotic resistance genes from manure-amended soil to vegetables. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 828, 154463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Guo, Y.; Qiu, T.; Gao, M.; Sun, Y.; Cheng, S.; Gao, H.; Wang, X. Diversity and abundance of antibiotic resistance genes in rhizosphere soil and endophytes of leafy vegetables: Focusing on the effect of the vegetable species. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 415, 125595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhang, Y.; Gu, A.Z.; Cen, T.; Li, X.; He, M.; Li, D.; Chen, J. Sub-inhibitory concentrations of heavy metals facilitate the horizontal transfer of plasmid-mediated antibiotic resistance genes in water environment. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 237, 74–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wang, X.; Lan, B.; Fei, H.; Wang, S.; Zhu, G. Heavy metal could drive co-selection of antibiotic resistance in terrestrial subsurface soils. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 411, 124848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Deng, W.; Zhang, A.; Chen, S.; He, X.; Jin, L.; Yu, X.; Yang, S.; Li, B.; Fan, L.; Ji, L.; et al. Heavy metals, antibiotics and nutrients affect the bacterial community and resistance genes in chicken manure composting and fertilized soil. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 257, 109980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Peng, S.; Feng, Y.; Wang, Y.; Guo, X.; Chu, H.; Lin, X. Prevalence of antibiotic resistance genes in soils after continually applied with different manure for 30 years. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 340, 16–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhao, X.; Shen, J.-P.; Zhang, L.-M.; Du, S.; Hu, H.-W.; He, J.-Z. Arsenic and cadmium as predominant factors shaping the distribution patterns of antibiotic resistance genes in polluted paddy soils. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 389, 121838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, L.; Wang, J.; Wang, J.; Zhu, L.; Conkle, J.L.; Yang, R. Soil types influence the characteristic of antibiotic resistance genes in greenhouse soil with long-term manure application. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 392, 122334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kianpoor Kalkhajeh, Y.; Huang, B.; Hu, W.; Ma, C.; Gao, H.; Thompson, M.L.; Bruun Hansen, H.C. Environmental soil quality and vegetable safety under current greenhouse vegetable production management in China. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2021, 307, 107230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sun, J.; Pan, L.; Li, Z.; Zeng, Q.; Wang, L.; Zhu, L. Comparison of greenhouse and open field cultivations across China: Soil characteristics, contamination and microbial diversity. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 243, 1509–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pan, Z.; Yang, S.; Zhao, L.; Li, X.; Weng, L.; Sun, Y.; Li, Y. Temporal and spatial variability of antibiotics in agricultural soils from Huang-Huai-Hai Plain, northern China. Chemosphere 2021, 272, 129803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhao, X.; Wang, J.; Zhu, L.; Wang, J. Field-based evidence for enrichment of antibiotic resistance genes and mobile genetic elements in manure-amended vegetable soils. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 654, 906–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Pu, Q.; Zhao, L.X.; Li, Y.T.; Su, J.Q. Manure fertilization increase antibiotic resistance in soils from typical greenhouse vegetable production bases, China. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 391, 122267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Cui, Y.; Bing, H.; Fang, L.; Wu, Y.; Yu, J.; Shen, G.; Jiang, M.; Wang, X.; Zhang, X. Diversity patterns of the rhizosphere and bulk soil microbial communities along an altitudinal gradient in an alpine ecosystem of the eastern Tibetan Plateau. Geoderma 2019, 338, 118–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xu, S.; Tian, L.; Chang, C.; Li, X.; Tian, C. Cultivated rice rhizomicrobiome is more sensitive to environmental shifts than that of wild rice in natural environments. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2019, 140, 68–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yuan, X.; Gan, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Dong, B. Level, source, and risk assessment of toxic elements in traditional agricultural soils and coping strategies. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2021, 193, 568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhi, S.; Zhou, J.; Liu, H.; Wu, H.; Zhang, Z.; Ding, Y.; Zhang, K. Simultaneous extraction and determination of 45 veterinary antibiotics in swine manure by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B 2020, 1154, 122286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, X.; Zhang, Q.; Liang, B.; Li, J. Changes in the abundance and structure of bacterial communities in the greenhouse tomato cultivation system under long-term fertilization treatments. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2017, 121, 82–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Newton, R.J.; Mcmahon, K.D. Seasonal differences in bacterial community composition following nutrient additions in a eutrophic lake. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 13, 887–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Liu, P.; Jia, S.; He, X.; Zhang, X.; Ye, L. Different impacts of manure and chemical fertilizers on bacterial community structure and antibiotic resistance genes in arable soils. Chemosphere 2017, 188, 455–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Xue, M.; Guo, Z.; Gu, X.; Gao, H.; Weng, S.; Zhou, J.; Gu, D.; Lu, H.; Zhou, X. Rare rather than abundant microbial communities drive the effects of long-term greenhouse cultivation on ecosystem functions in subtropical agricultural soils. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 706, 136004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhang, J.; Wang, P.; Tian, H.; Xiao, Q.; Jiang, H. Pyrosequencing-based assessment of soil microbial community structure and analysis of soil properties with vegetable planted at different years under greenhouse conditions. Soil Tillage Res. 2019, 187, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Pornsukarom, S.; Thakur, S. Assessing the impact of manure application in commercial swine farms on the transmission of antimicrobial resistant Salmonella in the environment. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0164621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pornsukarom, S.; Thakur, S. Horizontal dissemination of antimicrobial resistance determinants in multiple Salmonella serotypes following isolation from the commercial swine operation environment after manure application. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 83, e01503–e01517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Peng, S.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, B.; Lin, X. Long-term application of fresh and composted manure increase tetracycline resistance in the arable soil of eastern China. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 506–507, 279–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Peng, S.; Dolfing, J.; Feng, Y.; Wang, Y.; Lin, X. Enrichment of the antibiotic resistance gene tet(L) in an alkaline soil fertilized with plant derived organic manure. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. You, Y.; Hilpert, M.; Ward, M.J. Detection of a common and persistent tet(L)-carrying plasmid in chicken-waste-impacted farm soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 3203–3213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Obayiuwana, A.; Ogunjobi, A.; Yang, M.; Ibekwe, M. Characterization of bacterial communities and their antibiotic resistance profiles in wastewaters obtained from pharmaceutical facilities in Lagos and Ogun States, Nigeria. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Duan, M.; Gu, J.; Wang, X.; Li, Y.; Zhang, R.; Hu, T.; Zhou, B. Factors that affect the occurrence and distribution of antibiotic resistance genes in soils from livestock and poultry farms. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 180, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Radu, E.; Woegerbauer, M.; Rab, G.; Oismuller, M.; Strauss, P.; Hufnagl, P.; Gottsberger, R.A.; Krampe, J.; Weyermair, K.; Kreuzinger, N. Resilience of agricultural soils to antibiotic resistance genes introduced by agricultural management practices. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 756, 143699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Chen, Q.; An, X.; Li, H.; Zhu, Y.; Su, J.; Cui, L. Do manure-borne or indigenous soil microorganisms influence the spread of antibiotic resistance genes in manured soil? Soil Biol. Biochem. 2017, 114, 229–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Dong, P.; Wang, H.; Fang, T.; Wang, Y.; Ye, Q. Assessment of extracellular antibiotic resistance genes (eARGs) in typical environmental samples and the transforming ability of eARG. Environ. Int. 2019, 125, 90–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Han, X.M.; Hu, H.W.; Chen, Q.L.; Yang, L.Y.; Li, H.L.; Zhu, Y.G.; Li, X.Z.; Ma, Y.B. Antibiotic resistance genes and associated bacterial communities in agricultural soils amended with different sources of animal manures. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2018, 126, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Canal, N.; Meneghetti, K.L.; de Almeida, C.P.; da Rosa Bastos, M.; Otton, L.M.; Corcao, G. Characterization of the variable region in the class 1 integron of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli isolated from surface water. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2016, 47, 337–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Zhou, G.; Qiu, X.; Wu, X.; Lu, S. Horizontal gene transfer is a key determinant of antibiotic resistance genes profiles during chicken manure composting with the addition of biochar and zeolite. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 408, 124883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Li, J.; Xin, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, J.; Yan, J.; Li, H.; Hu, H. Long-term manure application increased the levels of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes in a greenhouse soil. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2017, 121, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Du, B.; Yang, Q.; Wang, R.; Wang, R.; Wang, Q.; Xin, Y. Evolution of antibiotic resistance and the relationship between the antibiotic resistance genes and microbial compositions under long-term exposure to tetracycline and sulfamethoxazole. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 4681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Liu, C.; Chen, Y.; Li, X.; Zhang, Y.; Ye, J.; Huang, H.; Zhu, C. Temporal effects of repeated application of biogas slurry on soil antibiotic resistance genes and their potential bacterial hosts. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 258, 113652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Rahman, M.M.; Shan, J.; Yang, P.; Shang, X.; Xia, Y.; Yan, X. Effects of long-term pig manure application on antibiotics, abundance of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), anammox and denitrification rates in paddy soils. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 240, 368–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Tseng, S.; Liang, C.; Chia, T.; Ton, S. Changes in the Composition of the Soil Bacterial Community in Heavy Metal-Contaminated Farmland. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 8661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Song, J.; Shen, Q.; Wang, L.; Qiu, G.; Shi, J.; Xu, J.; Brookes, P.C.; Liu, X. Effects of Cd, Cu, Zn and their combined action on microbial biomass and bacterial community structure. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 243, 510–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Huang, C.C.; LIang, C.M.; Yang, T.I.; Cheng, J.L.; Wang, W.K. Shift of bacterial communities in heavy metal-contaminated agricultural land during a remediation process. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0255137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Tang, X.; Lou, C.; Wang, S.; Lu, Y.; Liu, M.; Hashmi, M.Z.; Liang, X.; Li, Z.; Liao, Y.; Qin, W.; et al. Effects of long-term manure applications on the occurrence of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in paddy soils: Evidence from four field experiments in south of China. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2015, 90, 179–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Li, J.; Xu, Y. Effects of clay combined with moisture management on Cd immobilization and fertility index of polluted rice field. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 158, 182–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. He, L.; Ying, G.; Liu, Y.; Su, H.; Chen, J.; Liu, S.; Zhao, J. Discharge of swine wastes risks water quality and food safety: Antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes from swine sources to the receiving environments. Environ. Int. 2016, 92–93, 210–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The profile of bacterial communities in different greenhouse soils (phylum level).
Figure 1. The profile of bacterial communities in different greenhouse soils (phylum level).
Ijerph 19 07742 g001
Figure 2. Heatmap (A) and PCoA (B) based on the Bray–Curtis index of bacterial communities in different greenhouse soils.
Figure 2. Heatmap (A) and PCoA (B) based on the Bray–Curtis index of bacterial communities in different greenhouse soils.
Ijerph 19 07742 g002
Figure 3. Relative abundances of ARGs in different greenhouse soils.
Figure 3. Relative abundances of ARGs in different greenhouse soils.
Ijerph 19 07742 g003
Figure 4. Heatmap (A) and PCoA (B) based on the Bray–Curtis index of ARGs in different greenhouse soils.
Figure 4. Heatmap (A) and PCoA (B) based on the Bray–Curtis index of ARGs in different greenhouse soils.
Ijerph 19 07742 g004
Figure 5. Network analysis of correlation ((A)—the relationship of ARGs and intI genes; (B)—the relationships of ARGs and intI genes with bacteria). Edges are weighted according to the correlation coefficient. Red edges mean positive correlation, green edges mean negative correlation. Only significant correlation is shown (p < 0.05).
Figure 5. Network analysis of correlation ((A)—the relationship of ARGs and intI genes; (B)—the relationships of ARGs and intI genes with bacteria). Edges are weighted according to the correlation coefficient. Red edges mean positive correlation, green edges mean negative correlation. Only significant correlation is shown (p < 0.05).
Ijerph 19 07742 g005
Figure 6. RDA of bacterial communities in different greenhouse soils.
Figure 6. RDA of bacterial communities in different greenhouse soils.
Ijerph 19 07742 g006
Figure 7. Redundancy analysis (RDA) of ARGs in different greenhouse soils.
Figure 7. Redundancy analysis (RDA) of ARGs in different greenhouse soils.
Ijerph 19 07742 g007
Table 1. Contributions of physicochemical properties and heavy metal concentrations on bacterial communities and ARGs based on RDA.
Table 1. Contributions of physicochemical properties and heavy metal concentrations on bacterial communities and ARGs based on RDA.
FactorsARGsBacterial Community
Contribution %pContribution %p
Cr29.20.0022.10.46
Cu12.20.0067.90.004
Cd12.40.00613.50.002
OM11.70.00212.10.002
pH10.30.00417.70.002
Ni8.00.0130.60.002
Zn7.60.0166.50.008
As3.90.0924.90.032
Pb2.40.2380.90.896
Hg2.30.2263.90.092
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yuan, X.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, C.; Wang, W.; Wu, Y.; Fan, L.; Liu, B. Profile of Bacterial Community and Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Typical Vegetable Greenhouse Soil. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 7742. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137742

AMA Style

Yuan X, Zhang Y, Sun C, Wang W, Wu Y, Fan L, Liu B. Profile of Bacterial Community and Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Typical Vegetable Greenhouse Soil. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(13):7742. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137742

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yuan, Xuexia, Yong Zhang, Chenxi Sun, Wenbo Wang, Yuanjuan Wu, Lixia Fan, and Bing Liu. 2022. "Profile of Bacterial Community and Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Typical Vegetable Greenhouse Soil" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 13: 7742. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137742

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop