Support for Health Insurance Coverage for Legal Abortion in the United States
1.1. Historical Background and Current Status
2. Materials and Methods
3.1. Descriptive and Bivariate Analysis
3.2. Multivariate Analysis
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
- Boyle, E.; Minzee, K.; Longhofer, W. Abortion liberalization in world society, 1960–2009. Am. J. Sociol. 2015, 121, 882–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
- Stabile, B. Reproductive policy and the social construction of motherhood. Politics Life Sci. 2016, 35, 18–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- De Londras, F.; Enright, M. Repealing the 8th—Reforming Irish Abortion Law: A Rights-Based Approach to Abortion; Policy Press: Brristol, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Hurst, R.A.J. Abortion as a feminist pedagogy of grief in Marianna Apostolides’s Deep Salt Water. Fem. Stud. 2020, 46, 43–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnston, B.R.; Keogh, L.; Norman, W.V. Decriminalizing Abortion in the UK: What Would It Mean? Policy Press: Brristol, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Planned Parenthood. What Happens during an In-Clinic Abortion? 2020. Available online: https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/abortion/in-clinic-abortion-procedures/what-happens-during-an-in-clinic-abortion (accessed on 5 December 2020).
- Dine, R. Scarlet Letters: Getting the History of Abortion and Contraception Right. 2013. Available online: https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/religion/news/2013/08/08/71893/scarlet-letters-getting-the-history-of-abortion-and-contraception-right/ (accessed on 6 December 2020).
- Reagan, L.J. When Abortion Was a Crime: Women, Medicine, and Law in the United States, 1867–1973; University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Ravitz, J. The Surprising History of Abortion in the United States. 2016. Available online: https://www.cnn.com/2016/06/23/health/abortion-history-in-united-states/index.html (accessed on 4 December 2020).
- Dudden, F.E. Women’s rights advocates and abortion laws. J. Women’s Hist. 2019, 31, 102–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salganicoff, A.; Sobel, L.; Ramaswamy, A. Coverage for Abortion Services in Medicaid, Marketplace Plans and Private Plans. 2019. Available online: https://www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/issue-brief/coverage-for-abortion-services-in-medicaid-marketplace-plans-and-private-plans/ (accessed on 6 December 2020).
- Ellmann, N. State Actions Undermining Abortion Rights in 2020. 2020. Available online: https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/women/reports/2020/08/27/489786/state-actions-undermining-abortion-rights-2020/ (accessed on 5 December 2020).
- Gallup. Abortion Trends by Gender. 2021. Available online: https://news.gallup.com/poll/245618/abortion-trends-gender.aspx (accessed on 31 October 2021).
- Pew Research Center. Public Opinion on Abortion. 2021. Available online: https://www.pewforum.org/fact-sheet/public-opinion-on-abortion/ (accessed on 31 October 2021).
- Coombs, M.; Welch, S. Blacks, whites, and attitudes toward abortion. Public Opin. Q. 1982, 46, 510–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hall, E.; Ferree, M. Race differences in abortion attitudes. Public Opin. Q. 1986, 50, 193–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- KFF. Reported Legal Abortions by Race of Women who Obtained Abortion by the State of Occurrence. 2016. Available online: https://www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/state-indicator/abortions-by-race/?currentTimeframe=0&sortModel=%7B%22colId%22:%22Location%22,%22sort%22:%22asc%22%7D (accessed on 9 December 2020).
- Varney, S. Why Is the South the Epicenter of Anti-Abortion Fervor? 2021. Available online: https://khn.org/news/article/qa-why-south-is-anti-abortion-epicenter/ (accessed on 31 October 2021).
- Jelen, T.G.; Wilcox, C. 2003. Causes and consequences of public attitudes toward abortion: A review and research agenda. Political Res. Q. 2003, 56, 489–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Hoffmann, J.P.; Johnson, S.M. Attitudes toward abortion among religious traditions in the United States: Change or continuity? Sociol. Relig. 2005, 66, 161–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hare, W. Open-Mindedness and Education; McGill-Queen’s University Press: Kinston, ON, Canada; Montreal, QC, Canada, 1979. [Google Scholar]
- Verducci, S. Open-Mindedness and education. In The Oxford Encyclopedia of Philosophy of Education; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Granberg, D.; Granberg, B.W. Abortion attitudes, 1965-1980: Trends and determinants. Fam Plann Perspect. 1980, 12, 250–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jelen, T.G.; Damore, D.F.; Lamatsch, T. Gender, employment status, and abortion: A longitudinal analysis. Sex Roles 2002, 47, 321–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, G.Z.; Buffalo, M.D. Social and cultural determinants of attitudes toward abortion: A test of Reiss’ hypotheses. Soc. Sci. J. 2004, 41, 93–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luker, K. Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood; University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 1984. [Google Scholar]
- Legge, J.S., Jr. The determinants of attitudes toward abortion in the American electorate. West. Political Q. 1983, 36, 479–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hess, J.A.; Rueb, J.D. Attitudes toward abortion, religion, and party affiliation among college students. Curr. Psychol. 2005, 24, 24–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Statista Research Department. Support for Abortion by Party and Level of Legalization U.S. 2021. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1079467/abortion-support-party-level-legalization-us/ (accessed on 31 October 2021).
- Gallup. Abortion Trends by Party Identification. 2021. Available online: https://news.gallup.com/poll/246278/abortion-trends-party.aspx (accessed on 20 December 2021).
- Adams, G.D. Abortion: Evidence of an issue evolution. Am. J. Political Sci. 1997, 41, 718–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, T.; Davern, M.; Freese, J.; Hout, M. General Social Surveys, 1972–2018; NORC: Chicago, IL, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Afifi, A.; Clark, V. Computer-Aided Multivariate Analysis, 2nd ed.; Van Nostrand Reinhold: New York, NY, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
- Baker, R.K.; Epstein, L.K.; Forth, R.D. Matters of life and death: Social, political, and religious correlates of attitudes on abortion. Am. Politics Q. 1981, 9, 89–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Blake, J.; del Pinal, J.H. Predicting polar attitudes toward abortion in the United States. In Abortion Parley; Burtchael, J.T., Ed.; Andrews and McMeel: Kansas City, MO, USA, 1980; pp. 28–56. [Google Scholar]
- Brunn, S.D.; Webster, G.R.; Archer, J.C. The Bible belt in a changing South. Southeast Geogr. 2011, 51, 513–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Najmadadi, S. Greg Abbott Signs into Law one of Nation’s Strictest Abortion Measures, Banning Procedure as Early as Six Weeks into a Pregnancy. 2021. Available online: https://www.texastribune.org/2021/05/18/texas-heartbeat-bill-abortions-law/ (accessed on 25 June 2021).
- Halfmann, D. Political institutions and the comparative medicalization of abortion. J. Health Soc. Behav. 2019, 60, 138–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
|Support for health insurance to cover abortion||1 = Support, 0 = Oppose||0.498||0.50|
|Gender||1 = Female, 0 = Male||0.530||0.499|
|Black||1 = Black, 0 = Else||0.151||0.358|
|Other||1 = Other, 0 = Else||0.127||0.333|
|Region||1 = South, 0 = Else||0.390||0.488|
|Urban||1 = Urban, 0 = Rural||0.890||0.310|
|Religion||1 = Christian, 0 = Else||0.710||0.452|
|Marital status||1 = Currently married, 0 = Else||0.490||0.500|
|# of Children||Number||1.820||1.677|
|Education||Years of schooling||13.720||2.989|
|Full-time job||1 = Full-time, 0 = Else||0.500||0.500|
|Family income||USD in constant 2000 U.S. dollars||54,230.75||43,971.079|
|Party affiliation||1 = Democrat, 0 = Else||0.300||0.459|
|Political ideology||1 = Liberal, 0 = Else||0.300||0.458|
|Variable||Support for Health Insurance to Cover Abortion (%)||N||χ2|
|65 or older||50.3|
|Urban/rural residency||2134||29.706 ***|
|Marital Status||2,134||40.046 ***|
|Not curr. married||56.4|
|# of children||2130||15.681 ***|
|2 or less||52.5|
|3 or more||43.1|
|Not coll. educated||39.6|
|Not full time||48.9|
|Less than average||47.9|
|Average or more||51.7|
|Party affiliation||2106||94.114 ***|
|Political ideology||2051||138.761 ***|
|Predictor||Model 1||Model 2|
|B||Odds Ratio||B||Odds Ratio|
|Race (Ref. = White)|
|# of Children||−0.083 *|
|Family income in USD 1000||0.001|
|Education x Liberal||0.091 *|
|−2 Log Likelihood||2218.904||2213.882|
|Model χ2||356.048 ***||361.071 ***|
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Henderson, C.; Yang, P.Q. Support for Health Insurance Coverage for Legal Abortion in the United States. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 433. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010433
Henderson C, Yang PQ. Support for Health Insurance Coverage for Legal Abortion in the United States. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(1):433. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010433Chicago/Turabian Style
Henderson, Charley, and Philip Q. Yang. 2022. "Support for Health Insurance Coverage for Legal Abortion in the United States" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 1: 433. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010433