Next Article in Journal
Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic, Unethical Behavior in the Name of the Company: The Role of Job Insecurity, Job Embeddedness, and Turnover Intention
Previous Article in Journal
Habitat Segregation Patterns of Container Breeding Mosquitos: The Role of Urban Heat Islands, Vegetation Cover, and Income Disparity in Cemeteries of New Orleans
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Occurrence of Antibiotic-Resistant Staphylococcus spp. in Orange Orchards in Thailand

1
Department of Public Health, Faculty of Science and Technology, Chiang Mai Rajabhat University, Chiang Mai 50300, Thailand
2
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Chiang Mai Rajabhat University, Chiang Mai 50300, Thailand
3
Department of Public Health, Zuckerberg College of Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA 01854, USA
4
Department of Occupational Health and Safety, Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
5
Department of Food Science, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(1), 246; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010246
Submission received: 28 November 2021 / Revised: 21 December 2021 / Accepted: 22 December 2021 / Published: 27 December 2021

Abstract

:
Background: The widespread indiscriminate application of antibiotics to food crops to control plant disease represents a potential human health risk. In this study, the presence of antibiotic-resistant staphylococci associated with workers and orange orchard environments was determined. A total of 20 orchards (orange and other fruits) were enrolled in the study. Trees in the orange orchards were treated with ampicillin on a pre-determined schedule. Environmental samples (n = 60) included soil, water, and oranges; 152 hand and nasal samples were collected from 76 healthy workers. Antibiotic susceptibility profiles were determined for all staphylococcal isolates. Results: This investigation revealed that of the total Staphylococcus spp. recovered from the orange orchard, 30% (3/10) were resistant to erythromycin, 20% (2/10) were resistant to ampicillin, and 20% (2/10) resistant to both erythromycin and ampicillin. Conclusion: The application of antibiotics to orange trees in open production environments to halt the spread of bacterial disease presents risks to the environment and creates health concerns for Thai farmers using those agents. ARB on crops such as oranges may enter the global food supply and adversely affect public health.

1. Introduction

Multidrug-resistant bacteria rank among the world’s most important public health problems of the 21st century. The World Health Organization (WHO) suggests that if the world neglects taking action, then we are heading to a post-antibiotic era, in which common infections and minor injuries will result in death [1]. Currently, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) trends support the perspective of the WHO that worldwide, at least 700,000 people die each year from common diseases, including respiratory tract infections, sexually transmitted infections, urinary tract infections, and foodborne illnesses [2]. Annually, more than two million people in the United States suffer from illnesses caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria [ARB] [3]. A wealth of literature suggests that the ARB crisis is accelerated by the overuse and misuse of antibiotics in human medicine. Considerable attention has focused on the prevalence of ARB associated with food-producing animals and their environment, including commercial farms, feedlots, processing plants, and packing plants, since antibiotics are directly used for growth promotion and the prevention of diseases in food-producing animals [4,5,6,7,8]. The use of antibiotics and the spread of ARB associated with fruits (whether treated with antibiotics) through the global food supply is often overlooked [9]. ARB and antibiotic residues may also accumulate in the agriculture production environment, potentially adversely affecting farmworkers and consumer health.
According to regulatory agencies in the US and Britain, certain antibiotics (streptomycin, oxytetracycline) are permissible for use on production crops, including oranges, stone tree fruit, and pome fruit [10]. Gentamicin is used in the treatment of animal and human diseases but has been used to control plant diseases [11]. This is particularly true in Brazil, Korea, Thailand, and China for the control of citrus greening disease or Huanglongbing (HLB) and lettuce diseases [11,12]. In the United States, an alarm was raised for the spraying of antibiotics in open production environments to halt the spread of crop associated bacterial disease [13]. Indeed, from 1970 to the present, antibiotics such as ampicillin, amoxicillin, and tetracycline have been permitted for the prophylactic treatment of bacterial diseases in plants by Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus or HLB in citrus via a graft-based chemotherapy method [14,15,16]. In Thailand, farmers or orchard operators regularly use capsule forms of ampicillin, amoxicillin, and tetracycline for the treatment of HLB. The recommended treatment dose of ampicillin is 12,500–25,000 ppm (i.e., achieved by adding 50 ampicillin 250 mg or 500 mg capsules per 1 L of water) through injection into tree trunks approximately three to four times per year [17,18]. Uncontrolled use of various antibiotics to treat HBL was encouraged by some orchard operators, academics, and government agencies. Orchard owners purchased the antibiotics directly from retail pharmacies or agrochemical suppliers [19]. Prevalence of ARB in animal production has been reported [19,20,21,22], an absence of literature is available on ARB associated with orange orchards.
Staphylococci are Gram-positive bacteria associated with the respiratory tract and skin of humans and animals. Staphylococcus aureus and members of the S. intermedius group are the clinically most important coagulase-positive staphylococci in human and veterinary medicine, respectively. Dozens of coagulase-negative staphylococcal species have been described as colonizers of the skin and mucous membranes and as food- associated saprophytes [23,24]. Most of them are less frequently involved in clinically manifested infections; however, in particular species of the S. epidermidis group account significantly for foreign body-related infections [24,25]. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Staphylococcus spp. exhibited resistance rates to penicillin, ampicillin, and erythromycin of 96.6%–00%, 96.6%–8%, and 50%–7.1%, respectively [26,27,28]. A study in Thailand showed that the prevalence of community-acquired bacteraemia, healthcare-acquired bacteraemia, and hospital-acquired bacteraemia caused by MDR S. aureus was 8%, 28%, and 50%, respectively [29]. Antibiotic-resistant staphylococci have been isolated from the soil, surface water, wastewater, household surface dust, air, and a variety of crops intended for human consumption, as well as orange and apple juice products [30,31,32]. Antibiotic use in orange crop production may result in antibiotic residues in the environment and an increase in ARB entering the global food supply chain.
This study addresses the antibiotic susceptibility of Staphylococcus spp. Found in the environment (soil, water, and oranges surface) and workers (nasal and hand) from orange orchards.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Orange Orchards and Recruitment

Ten orange orchards and ten other fruit orchards (longan, and mango) located in northern Thailand were recruited from April 2020 to September 2020 using the selective inclusion criteria as follows: (1). Orange orchards were treated with antibiotics for more than 1 year, (2). Other fruit orchards received no antibiotics, (3). Orchards were not in proximity of potential sources of antibiotic contamination such as livestock production operations and hospitals, (4). Volunteer workers must be healthy, actively working in the orchards and have no history of illness requiring hospitalization in the inpatient department (IPD) or intensive care unit (ICU). Informed consent and assent were obtained from the orchard owners and workers.

2.2. Environmental Sample Collection

Samples of soil, water, and oranges were obtained. Samples were collected during periods when antibiotics were administered to orange trees. In brief, 10 soil samples from each orchard were collected from the antibiotic preparation area and under the orange tree canopy at pre-selected sites. Soil samples were collected by digging a V shape hole to a depth of approximately 15 cm. The hole was gouged on one side from top to bottom, and a 2–3 cm thick section of soil was collected and pooled. Ten water samples in a total volume of 1 L from different surface waters from each orchard were collected by immersing a sterile container in the water to a depth of 30 cm. The samples were then pooled [33]. Ten oranges/other fruits were collected into individual sterile bags containing diluent, placed into a cooler and transported back to the laboratory for microbiological analysis. Each bag was hand massaged for 60 s prior to sample collection [34].

2.3. Worker Samples Collection

Orange orchard workers (n = 44) and other fruit orchard workers (n = 32) were selected randomly to participate in the study. Hand and nasal samples were collected from each participant during the period when orchards were administering antibiotics to the orange trees. Hand samples were collected by placing a sterile grid 25 cm2 on the palm and back of the hand and swabbing the area with a sterile swab that had been immersed in a diluent. Swabs were then placed into sterile test tubes [35,36]. Nasal samples were collected using sterile cotton swabs at the same time as when hand samples were collected. A swab was inserted in the anterior nasal chamber (approximately 2 cm), rotated around the nasal mucosa, and placed back into a sterile test tube [37]. All samples were immediately placed in a portable cooler and transported back to the laboratory.

2.4. Bacterial Isolates

Samples were serial 1:10 diluted (in Phosphate-buffered saline), 0.2 mL of an appropriate dilution spread plated onto Mueller Hinton agar (MHA; Gibthai Co., Ltd., Chiang Mai, Thailand), and incubated at 37 °C for 24–48 h. Initial screening of the isolates was conducted based on colonial morphology on trypticase soy agar plates containing 5% sheep blood (TSA-SB; Biomedia [Thailand] Co. Ltd., Nonthaburi, Thailand), Gram stain, and catalase reaction. All tests were conducted in duplicate [37].
Isolates were identified using a biochemical tests kit (bioMerieux API, Marcy-l’Etoile, France). The total aerobic bacterial count was determined using the spread plate method [38].

2.5. Identification of Isolates

Species identification was based on 16S rDNA sequencing. The universal primers 27F (5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′) and 1492R (5′-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′) were used for amplification [39]. The PCR conditions were as follows: one cycle of 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, primer annealing at 55 °C for 45 s, and extension at 72 °C for 2 min. A final extension step at 72°C for 10 min was then performed. Amplified products were isolated using 1% agarose gel electrophoresis, and purified products were submitted for DNA sequencing. DNA sequences were compared to a database of known 16S rRNA sequences using BLAST (blastn with default parameters) to identify the species of each isolate. (Macrogen, Seoul, Korea)

2.6. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed using the Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion method [38]. Susceptibility to ampicillin (10 μg), tetracycline (30 μg), and erythromycin (15 μg) was determined (Himedia, India). Only zones of complete inhibition by visual inspection were measured, recorded, and interpreted as susceptible (S), intermediate (I), or resistant (R).

2.7. Data Analysis

The antibiotic susceptibility of Staphylococcus spp. in each type of environmental sample were described by the number and percentage of positive samples.

3. Results

3.1. Demographics

Orange orchards were placed into one of three size ranges; <1.6 hectares (53.3%), >1.6 hectares to 3.2 hectares (30%), and >3.2 hectares (16.7%). Orange trees in all orchards were treated with ampicillin (12,500–15,000 ppm of ampicillin in water) for at least one year. Ampicillin was delivered through injection or injection drip into tree trunks approximately three to four times per year (Figure 1). In control orange orchards, no antibiotics were used. Orchard workers included owners and employees. Employees were temporary workers averaging 10.1 ± 8.1 years’ experience, working 7.1 ± 2.1 h/day, and 5.1 ± 1.9 days/week. Owners averaged 16.2 ± 11.9 years’ experience, working 7.1 ± 2.1 h/day, and 5.4 ± 2.2 days/week. Orange orchards included in the study were not in close proximity to livestock farming operations or hospitals that may serve as potential sources of antibiotic contamination.

3.2. Identification of Staphylococcus Species Isolated

A total of 212 samples were collected, which included 60 soil, water, and orange samples from orange orchards and non-orange fruit orchards; 152 hand and nose swab samples were collected from 76 healthy workers. A total of 42% (21/50) of bacterial isolates came from the environment, and 76% (31/41) of bacterial isolates were from workers. Staphylococcus spp. were recovered from 19% (6/31) of the environmental samples and 13% (4/21) of the worker samples. However, it is worth noting that Staphylococcus spp. were more prevalent in orange orchards than other fruit orchards (9:1). The staphylococci belonged to four species: Staphylococcus epidermidis (40%), Staphylococcus arlettae (30%), Staphylococcus haemolyticus (20%), and Staphylococcus saprophyticus (10%) (Table 1).

3.3. Antimicrobial Susceptibility

Antibiotic susceptibility was determined for each staphylococcal isolate (Table 2 and Supplementary S1). Most isolates (70%; 7/10) were resistant to at least one antibiotic. All staphylococcal isolates recovered from orange orchards exhibited resistance: 30% (3/10) resistant to erythromycin, 20% (2/10) resistant to ampicillin, and 20% (2/10) resistant to erythromycin and ampicillin (Figure 2). None of the isolates exhibited resistance to tetracycline. Staphylococcus arlettae isolated from water samples exhibited resistance to erythromycin and ampicillin. Staphylococcus haemolyticus and Staphylococcus saprophyticus recovered from environmental samples were resistant to erythromycin. Staphylococcus epidermidis isolated from workers exhibited resistance to ampicillin. In general, erythromycin resistance was associated with environmental isolates, while ampicillin resistance was associated with isolates recovered from the environment and workers.

4. Discussion

There is a significant knowledge gap concerning the use of antibiotics on edible fruit crops and the occurrence of ARB on those fruits. In the present study, Staphylococcus spp. resistant to erythromycin and ampicillin were only recovered from samples collected from orange orchards applying ampicillin to trees for the control of HLB. Staphylococcus spp. are associated with diseases of humans and animals and have been recovered from the environment (e.g., water and soil); therefore, isolation from an orange production environment is not unexpected. The recovery of antibiotic-resistant staphylococci from oranges and orange orchard environments raises concern for the spread of ARB through the food supply chain. The occurrence of antimicrobial-resistant microorganisms associated with fresh fruits or their production environment is of human health importance. For example, Aspergillus fumigatus resistance to all triazole antifungals recovered from patients likely originated in the environment [40].
The unregulated application of antibiotics may result in increased populations of ARB and antibiotic residues on crops intended for human consumption resulting in the spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and exacerbating a global health crisis. Thai mandarin orange growers indicated they adjusted HLB antibiotic treatment, antibiotic concentration, volume, frequency, route of administration, and combination of antibiotics based on outcomes rather than following science-based recommendations [18]. Orange growers participating in the present study used ampicillin for the treatment of HLB, which is not approved for use, for example, in the United States and Britain. Very few studies have addressed the issues of antibiotic use on food crops and ARB on antibiotic-treated crops or the surrounding environment. Parameters influencing the mobility and stability of antimicrobials in the environment must be addressed to protect the global food supply and human health.
The Staphylococcus spp. isolated in the present study are classified as coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) and are associated with nosocomial infections [24]. The results of this study are consistent with previous reports in which S. epidermidis, S. arlettae, S. haemolyticus, and S. saprophyticus recovered from non-healthcare settings [41,42] and healthcare settings [43,44] were often resistant to multiple antibiotics (e.g., penicillin, erythromycin, amoxicillin, and ampicillin). Unlike meat and poultry, which are thermally processed prior to cooking, oranges are consumed raw, and therefore ARB is not inactivated. ARB on the orange surface can cross-contaminate the edible portion of the orange during peeling. The present study did not investigate the potential dissemination of antibiotic residues associated with oranges exposed to antibiotics. Although coagulase-negative staphylococci are not considered foodborne pathogens, they may play an important role in the spread of antibiotic resistance genes in community and hospital environments.

5. Conclusions

The ramifications of the direct application of antibiotics to food crops such as oranges and the emergence and spread ARB on human health are not fully appreciated. The application of antibiotics to orange trees in open production environments to halt the spread of the bacterial disease of a crop presents risks to the environment and creates health concerns for farmers using those agents. The present study focused on Gram- positive bacteria exhibiting multi-antibiotic resistance. Gram-negative bacteria are commonly isolated from fresh fruits and vegetables and therefore should be included in future investigations of ARB. ARB and antibiotic residues on crops such as oranges may enter the global food supply and adversely impact human health. The presence of ARB on foods that will not undergo a process to inactivate the bacteria prior to consumption may represent a greater risk for the spread of ARB and antibiotic resistance genes.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijerph19010246/s1, Supplementary File S1: Antimicrobial Susceptibility Raw Data.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.R., S.W. and K.R.M.; methodology, S.R. and K.R.M.; validation, A.D. and S.R.; formal analysis, A.D. and S.R.; investigation, S.R. and K.R.M.; resources, S.R. and. P.K.; data curation, S.R.; writing—original draft preparation, S.R.; writing—review and editing, K.R.M.; supervision, K.R.M., P.K. and S.W.; project administration, S.R.; funding acquisition, S.W. and P.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Research reported in this publication was supported by the Fogarty International Center of the National Institute of Health under Award Number U2RTW010088. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Health.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent has been obtained from the research participant(s) to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Mahidol University and the University of Massachusetts Lowell Center for Work Environment Nutrition and Human Development (CWEND) for funding this project. In addition, we would also like to extend our deepest gratitude to the research participants, who have given up numerous hours of their time to contribute to this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. WHO. Fact Sheet: Antibiotic Resistance. 2018. Available online: http://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/antibiotic-resistance (accessed on 4 November 2021).
  2. Interagency Coordination Group on Antimicrobial Resistance. No Time to Wait: Securing the Future from Drug-Resistant Infections. Report to the Secretary-General of the United Nations. 2019. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/no-time-to-wait-securing-the-future-from-drug-resistant-infections (accessed on 4 November 2021).
  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States 2019. 2019. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/pdf/threats-report/2019-ar-threats-report-508.pdf (accessed on 4 November 2021).
  4. Aslam, M. Antimicrobial resistance and genetic profiling of Escherichia coli from a commercial beef packing plant. J. Food Prot. 2006, 69, 1508–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Santos, F.B.O.; D’Souza, D.H.; Jaykus, L.; Ferket, P.R.; Sheldon, B.W. Genotypes, serotypes, and antibiotic resistance profiles of Salmonella isolated from commercial North Carolina turkey farms. J. Food Prot. 2007, 70, 1328–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Aslam, M.; Diarra, M.S.; Rempel, H. Antimicrobial resistance genes in Escherichia coli isolates recovered from a commercial beef processing plant. J. Food Prot. 2009, 72, 1089–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Edrington, T.S.; Long, M.; Ross, T.T.; Thomas, J.D.; Callaway, T.R.; Anderson, R.C.; Craddock, F.; Salisbury, M.W.; Nisbet, D.J. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Escherichia coli O157: H7 and Salmonella isolated from feedlot lambs. J. Food Prot. 2009, 72, 1713–1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Jouini, A.; Slama, K.B.; Sáenz, Y.; Klibi, N.; Costa, D.; Vinué, L.; Zarazaga, M.; Boudabous, A.; Torres, C. Detection of multiple-antimicrobial resistance and characterization of the implicated genes in Escherichia coli isolates from foods of animal origin in Tunis. J. Food Prot. 2009, 72, 1082–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Taylor, P.; Reeder, R. Antibiotic use on crops in low and middle-income countries based on recommendations made by agricultural advisors. CABI Agric. Biosci. 2020, 1, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. US Environmental Protection Agency. Proposed Registration Decision for the New Use of the Active Ingredient Streptomycin Sulfate on Citrus Crop Group 10–10. 2018. Available online: https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0067-0023 (accessed on 4 November 2021).
  11. Vidaver, A.K. Uses of antimicrobials in plant agriculture. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2002, 34, S107–S110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Qiao, M.; Ying, G.G.; Singerd, A.C.; Zhu, Y.G. Review of antibiotic resistance in China and its environment. Environ. Int. 2018, 110, 160–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. McKenna, M. Antibiotics set to flood Florida’s troubled orange orchards. Nature 2019, 567, 302–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Schwarz, R.E.; van Vuuren, S.P. Decreases in fruit greening of sweet orange by trunk injections with tetracyclines. Plant Dis. Rep. 1970, 55, 747–750. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhang, M.; Powell, C.A.; Guo, Y.; Doud, M.S.; Duan, Y.A. Graft-based chemotherapy method for screening effective molecules and rescuing Huanglongbing-affected citrus plants. Phytopathology 2012, 102, 567–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Zhang, M.; Guo, Y.; Powell, C.A.; Doud, M.S.; Yang, C.; Duan, Y. Effective antibiotics against ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ in HLB-affected citrus plants identified via the graft-based evaluation. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e111032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Public Health Ministry of Thailand. Landscape of Antimicrobial Resistance. 2015. Available online: https://www.fda.moph.go.th/sites/drug/SitePages/AMR.aspx (accessed on 4 November 2021).
  18. Chanvatik, S.; Donnua, S.; Lekagul, A.; Kaewkhankhaeng, W.; Vongmongkol, V.; Athipunyakom, P.; Khamlar, S.; Prommintara, M.; Tangcharoensathien, V. Antibiotic use in mandarin production (Citrus reticulata Blanco) in major mandarin producing areas in Thailand: A survey assessment. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0225172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Sommanustweechai, A.; Chanvatik, S.; Sermsinsiri, V.; Sivilaikul, S.; Patcharanarumol, W.; Yeunga, S.; Tangcharoensathienb, V. Antibiotic distribution channels in Thailand: Results of key-informant interviews, reviews of drug regulations and database searches. Bull. World Health Organ. 2018, 96, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Dandachi, I.; Sokhn, E.S.; Dahdouh, E.A.; Azar, E.; El-Bazzal, B.; Rolain, J.M.; Daoud, Z. Prevalence and Characterization of Multi-Drug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli Isolated From Lebanese Poultry: A Nationwide Study. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Beresin, G.A.; Wright, J.M.; Rice, G.E.; Jagai, J.S. Swine exposure and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection among hospitalized patients with skin and soft tissue infections in Illinois: A ZIP code-level analysis. Environ. Res. 2017, 159, 46–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kittl, S.; Brodard, I.; Heim, D.; Andina, P.; Fister, P.; Overesch, G. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains in Swiss pigs and their relation to isolates from farmers and veterinarians. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 86, e01865-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Foster, T. Staphylococcus. In Medical Microbiology, 4th ed.; Baron, S., Ed.; University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston: Galveston, TX, USA, 1996. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK8448/ (accessed on 20 December 2021).
  24. Becker, K.; Heilmann, C.; Peters, G. Coagulase-negative staphylococci. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2014, 27, 870–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Heilmann, C.; Ziebuhr, W.; Becker, K. Are coagulase-negative staphylococci virulent? Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2019, 25, 1071–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Guo, Y.; Song, G.; Sun, M.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y. Prevalence and Therapies of antibiotic-resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Ming-Xiang, Z.; Rong-Rong, Z.; Wen-Jun, W.; Ning-Jie, Z.; Wen-En, L.; Fu-Ping, H.; Xue-Gong, F. Antimicrobial resistance and molecular epidemiological characteristics of clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus in Changsha area. Chin. Med. J. 2012, 125, 2289–2294. [Google Scholar]
  28. Charu, A.; Jyoti, K.C.; Shreya, N. Prevalence of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Shrines. Int. J. Microbiol. 2020, 2020, 7981648. [Google Scholar]
  29. Lim, C.; Takahashi, E.; Hongsuwan, M.; Wuthiekanun, V.; Thamlikitkul, V.; Hinjoy, S.; Day, N.P.J.; Peacock, S.J.; Limmathurotsakul, D. Epidemiology and burden of multidrug resistant bacterial infection in a developing country. Elife 2016, 5, e18082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Zieliński, W.; Korzeniewska, E.; Harnisz, M.; Hubeny, J.; Buta, M.; Rolbiecki, D. The prevalence of drug-resistant and virulent Staphylococcus spp. in a municipal wastewater treatment plant and their spread in the environment. Environ. Int. 2020, 143, 105914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Silva, V.; Caniça, M.; Capelo, J.L.; Igrejas, G.; Poeta, P. Diversity and genetic lineages of environmental staphylococci: A surface water overview. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2020, 96, fiaa191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sharafati Chaleshtori, R.; Sharafati Chaleshtori, F.; Karimi, A. Antibiotic resistance pattern of Staphylococcus strains isolated from orange and apple juices in Shahre-kord, Iran. Pak. J. Med. Sci. 2010, 26, 615–618. [Google Scholar]
  33. Alipour, M.; Hajiesmaili, R.; Talebjannat, M.; Yahyapour, Y. Identification and antimicrobial resistance of Enterococcus spp. isolated from the river and coastal waters in northern Iran. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, 287458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Ismaïl, R.; Aviat, F.; Valérie, M.; Bayon, I.L.; Gay-Perret, P.; Kutnik, M.; Fédérighi, M. Methods for Recovering Microorganisms from Solid Surfaces Used in the Food Industry: A Review of the Literature. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2013, 10, 6169–6183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kaur, K.; Kahlon, R.S. Prevalence of Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Ready to Eat Foods, Hand Swabs and Utensil Swabs of Street Vendors Selling Food on Wheels. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2017, 6, 2424–2431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Miller, J.M.; Holmes, H.T. Specimen Collection, Transport, and Storage. In Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 7th ed.; Murray, P.R., Baron, E.J., Eds.; American Society for Microbiology: Washington, DC, USA, 1999; pp. 33–104. [Google Scholar]
  37. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: CLSI Supplement M100, 29th ed.; Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute: Malvern, PA, USA, 2018; pp. 54–62. [Google Scholar]
  38. Buchanan, R.E.; Gibbons, N.E. Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 8th ed.; The Williams and Wilkins Co.: Baltimore, MD, USA, 1974; pp. 483–489. [Google Scholar]
  39. Frank, J.A.; Reich, C.I.; Sharma, S.; Weisbaum, J.S.; Wilson, B.A.; Olsen, G.J. Critical evaluation of two primers commonly used for amplification of bacterial 16S rRNA genes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 2461–2470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Verweij, P.E.; Kema, G.H.; Zwaan, B.; Melchers, W.J. Triazole fungicides and the selection of resistance to medical triazoles in the opportunistic mould Aspergillus fumigatus. Pest Manag. Sci. 2013, 69, 165–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xu, Z.; Shah, H.N.; Misra, R.; Chen, J.; Zhang, W.; Liu, Y.; Cutler, R.R.; Mkrtchyan, H.V. The prevalence, antibiotic resistance and mecA characterization of coagulase negative staphylococci recovered from non-healthcare settings in London, UK. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control. 2018, 7, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Lu, Y.; Lu, Q.; Cheng, Y.; Wen, G.; Luo, Q.; Shao, H.; Zhang, T. High concentration of coagulase-negative staphylococci carriage among bioaerosols of henhouses in Central China. BMC Microbiol. 2020, 20, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Nasaj, M.; Saeidi, Z.; Tahmasebi, H.; Dehbashi, S.; Reza, A.M. Prevalence and distribution of resistance and enterotoxins/enterotoxin-like genes in different clinical isolates of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus. Eur. J. Med. Res. 2020, 25, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Teeraputon, S.; Santanirand, P.; Wongchai, T.; Songjang, W.; Lapsomthob, N.; Jaikrasun, D.; Toonkaew, S.; Tophon, P. Prevalence of methicillin resistance and macrolide–lincosamide–streptogramin B resistance in Staphylococcus haemolyticus among clinical strains at a tertiary-care hospital in Thailand. New Microbes New Infect. 2017, 19, 28–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Ampicillin being administered to an orange tree (A). Drip bottles used to administer ampicillin (B).
Figure 1. Ampicillin being administered to an orange tree (A). Drip bottles used to administer ampicillin (B).
Ijerph 19 00246 g001
Figure 2. Percentages of Staphylococcus species recovered from orange orchards resistant to antibiotics.
Figure 2. Percentages of Staphylococcus species recovered from orange orchards resistant to antibiotics.
Ijerph 19 00246 g002
Table 1. Identification of Staphylococcus species isolated from environmental and worker samples from orange orchards or other fruit orchards.
Table 1. Identification of Staphylococcus species isolated from environmental and worker samples from orange orchards or other fruit orchards.
Staphylococcus SpeciesOrange OrchardOther Fruit OrchardTotal
Env.WorkerEnv.WorkerEnv.Worker
Staphylococcus epidermidis-3 h,h,n-1 n-4
Staphylococcus arlettae2 w,w1 n--21
Staphylococcus haemolyticus1 os1 n--11
Staphylococcus saprophyticus1 s---1-
Env. = environmental; h = hand; n = nose; os = orange surface; s = soil; w = surface water.
Table 2. Antibiotic susceptibility of staphylococci isolated from the environment and workers.
Table 2. Antibiotic susceptibility of staphylococci isolated from the environment and workers.
Susceptibility *
Staphylococcal IsolateAmpicillinErythromycinTetracycline
Staphylococcus epidermidis 01 008h1g2RSS
Staphylococcus epidermidis 008h1g3RSS
Staphylococcus epidermidis 009n1g1SSS
Staphylococcus epidermidis 016h1g2SSS
Staphylococcus arlettae 001wg6RRS
Staphylococcus arlettae 003wg1RRS
Staphylococcus arlettae 006n2g1SRS
Staphylococcus haemolyticus 001n2b1SSS
Staphylococcus haemolyticus 002worg2SRS
Staphylococcus saprophyticus 004soig1SRS
* susceptible (S), intermediate (I) or resistant (R).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rattanapunya, S.; Deethae, A.; Woskie, S.; Kongthip, P.; Matthews, K.R. Occurrence of Antibiotic-Resistant Staphylococcus spp. in Orange Orchards in Thailand. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 246. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010246

AMA Style

Rattanapunya S, Deethae A, Woskie S, Kongthip P, Matthews KR. Occurrence of Antibiotic-Resistant Staphylococcus spp. in Orange Orchards in Thailand. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(1):246. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010246

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rattanapunya, Siwalee, Aomhatai Deethae, Susan Woskie, Pornpimol Kongthip, and Karl R. Matthews. 2022. "Occurrence of Antibiotic-Resistant Staphylococcus spp. in Orange Orchards in Thailand" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 1: 246. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010246

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop