Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of the B.strong Queensland Indigenous Health Worker Brief Intervention Training Program for Multiple Health Risk Behaviours
Next Article in Special Issue
Morphological and Motor Fitness Determinants of Shotokan Karate Performance
Previous Article in Journal
Massive Edema of the Lower Limbs in Patients after Spinal Cord Injury—One Picture, Different Diagnoses
Previous Article in Special Issue
Patterns of Alcohol Consumption in the PURE Poland Cohort Study and Their Relationship with Health Problems
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Assessment of the Health Behaviours and Value-Based Health Analysis of People Aged 50+ Who Were Hospitalized Due to Cardiovascular Disease

1
Medical Institute, Jan Godek State University in Sanok, 38-500 Sanok, Poland
2
Faculty of Health Sciences, Calisia University, 62-800 Kalisz, Poland
3
Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland
4
Head of the Department of Public Health and Health Services, Grodno State Medical University, 230009 Grodno, Belarus
5
Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Lodz, 90-647 Lodz, Poland
6
Department of Social Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Lodz, 90-647 Lodz, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(8), 4221; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18084221
Submission received: 22 February 2021 / Revised: 13 April 2021 / Accepted: 15 April 2021 / Published: 16 April 2021

Abstract

:
Introduction: The basic determinant of healthy behaviour—among other human behaviours—is the fact that it consistently affects health. Nowadays, health behaviour studies are considered to be an important method of measuring the health of a population. Objective: To assess the health behaviours and value-based health analysis of people aged 50+ who were hospitalized due to cardiovascular disease, depending on the selected descriptive variables. Materials and methods: The study was conducted between April 2018 and December 2018 among 411 subjects aged 50+ who were hospitalized due to cardiovascular disease at the Independent Public Health Care Unit in Sanok (Podkarpackie voivodship in Poland). The method used in the study was a diagnostic survey. The study used the authors’ survey questionnaire and two standardized tests: Inventory of Health-Related Behaviour (IHB) and List of Health Criteria (LHC). A statistical analysis was carried out in the R program, version 3.5.1. The obtained results were subjected to thorough statistical analysis using the following tests: Student’s t, Mann–Whitney U, ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis, Fisher’s Least Significant Difference (LSD), Pearson, and Spearman. Results: The strongest correlation between health status and health behaviours (according to the IHB questionnaire) was in the area of ‘health practices’, while the lowest correlation was found in the areas of ‘correct eating habits’ and ‘preventive behaviours’. Based on the LHC questionnaire, the most important health criteria according to the subjects were ‘not feeling any physical ailments’; ‘having all body parts functional’; ‘feeling well’; ‘eating properly’; and ‘infrequent need of going to the doctor’. A positive correlation was found in the group of respondents where the ‘preventive health behaviours’ were more intense; herein, the more important criterion for the respondents was ‘eating properly’. Conclusions: Respondents aged 50+ and hospitalized for cardiovascular diseases indicated (based on the IHB questionnaire) that health behaviours in the area of ‘health practices’ had the strongest correlation with their health, while the lowest correlation was found in the areas of ‘correct eating habits’ and ‘preventive behaviours’. According to the respondents, the most important criteria determining health (according to the LHC questionnaire) included ’not feeling any physical ailments’; ‘having all body parts functional’; ‘feeling well’; ‘eating properly’; and ‘infrequent need of going to the doctor’. Based on the information collected from the respondents, it was found that the most important criteria determining health depended on selected descriptive variables, such as age, gender, place of residence, education, and marital status.

1. Introduction

Due to the development of the demographic situation in Poland, the issues of reducing morbidity and mortality due to cardiovascular diseases occupy an important place in scientific publications. Cardiovascular diseases have been the greatest threat to the lives of Poles for over 50 years, although the share of these diseases in the total number of deaths has decreased by over 7% over the last 20 years. Undoubtedly, the observed changes have been influenced primarily by the change in health behaviours, especially eating habits and regular preventive examinations [1,2,3].
However, despite the improvement in the epidemiological situation, in the last two decades the mortality rate due to cardiovascular diseases, especially the mortality rate (in people aged below 60), still has been high in Poland. Given the current disease trends and the pace of ageing of the Polish population, it is estimated that the number of deaths due to cardiovascular diseases in 2022 will exceed 200,000 [4,5,6].
The abovementioned epidemiological data justify the need to conduct research on the health behaviours of people of different ages in terms of assessing their health behaviours, and subsequently to take appropriate steps to eliminate incorrect health behaviours that may lead to, among others, cardiovascular diseases.
Nowadays, health behaviour studies are considered to be an important method of measuring the health of a population [1,2,3,4,5,6]. The choice of specific behaviours depends on the importance of health in one’s system of values [1,2,3,4,5,7]. It should be emphasized, however, that the health status is conditioned by many factors, such as behavioural factors, genetic conditions, and health care [4].
Health behaviours are defined as activities aimed at maintaining or regaining health. Health behaviours are a form of a person’s activity aimed at achieving health goals. The aim of the activities undertaken by healthy people is to maintain or increase health resources, while in patients it is to improve their health [2,3,8,9]. These behaviours include behaviours aimed at maintaining well-being; behaviours protecting health; behaviours reducing the risk of losing health; activities of those who noticed disease symptoms in themselves—in order to accurately assess their own health condition and take preventive measures; and activities of a person describing themselves as sick—to improve their state of health and to improve their state of health through a treatment process [8,9,10]. Health behaviours are reactions to all health-related situations, as well as habits and deliberate activities. Each person permanently, intentionally, consciously, and independently makes choices about behaviours that have a positive or negative impact on health. An important determinant of the decisions made is life experience and knowledge in the field of health and disease [1,2,3,4,5,8]. Determinants of choosing health behaviours include age, gender, life goals, social situation (education, social roles, origin, material situation, and place of residence), and cultural situation (world view, family and national traditions, and customs) [1,2,3]. Health behaviours that positively influence human health—apart from one’s self-control, responsibility for one’s own health, and a positive attitude—are mainly a healthy diet, regular physical activity, and an adequate amount of sleep per day. Disease risk factors and thus negative health behaviours include smoking, incorrect diet, low or no physical activity, and alcohol abuse [4,5,11,12,13]. The unsatisfactory health situation of the Polish population, with a tendency to deteriorate in some spheres, requires specific health and preventive measures. The study and analysis of health behaviours create an opportunity to diagnose the areas of ignorance in the field of health care, to determine the risks and harmfulness, as well as to determine the scale of the problem in order to prevent irregularities or pathologies [4,12].
It should be noted that the contemporary society is ageing [10,11,12,13,14]. Life expectancy in Poland increases but it remains significantly shorter than the average in the European Union (EU) by approximately 4 years. The development of civilization and an increasing life expectancy have become the main factors that contribute to the unsatisfactory health condition of the society, especially in the 50+ group [2,15].
The ageing period is characterized by the intensification of physical changes, which are manifested mainly by burdensome ailments and multiple diseases. The biggest threat to life related to incorrect health behaviours are cardiovascular diseases, which are a serious problem in terms of medicine, social life, and economy. Cardiovascular diseases have an epidemiological nature and are therefore referred to as ‘civilization diseases’. They are the most common causes of death in Poland, Europe, and worldwide. They often cause physical and mental disability and require huge financial funding, both in terms of public finances and individual patient spending [16,17,18,19,20,21,22].
Hence, strengthening the correct and changing the incorrect actions that condition one’s health has a significant impact on the increased quality of life, despite the unstoppable changes in the physical functioning of the ageing people [23,24,25,26]. Assessment of the level and the quality of health behaviours allows for undertaking educational activities, care, and treatment towards the senior population [24,25,26]
However, it should be emphasized that the key to maintaining and improving health is prevention.
Incorrect lifestyle is a factor underlying many chronic diseases. A study by Italian researchers has shown that more than half of the Italian population does not meet the WHO thresholds for at least moderate physical activity. The study assessed the impact on health and healthcare expenditure of seven public health policies aimed at promoting exercise and physical activity against a normal business scenario. The assessed policies included promotion of active transport, interventions at sedentary workplaces, investments in sports and recreation, mass-media campaigns, prescription of physical activity in primary care, school-based interventions, and mobile apps. The researchers concluded that public policies promoting physical activity could improve the health of the population and save healthcare expenditure, which would help avoid hundreds of cases of cardiovascular disease and diabetes per year, and dozens of cancer cases [27].
A similar situation in terms of a low level of physical activity can be observed in other countries, e.g., in Poland, Germany, the UK, and Belgium. Hence, appropriate steps should be taken to change the incorrect lifestyle of the society and thus prevent the occurrence of many dangerous chronic diseases in the future [28]
The aim of this study is to assess the health behaviours and value-based health analysis of people aged 50+ who were hospitalized due to cardiovascular disease, depending on the selected descriptive variables. The main hypothesis is as follows: Among the variables of the Inventory of Health-Related Behaviour (IHB), health practices had the strongest correlation with health, while understanding health, according to the List of Health Criteria (LHC), significantly affected the health behaviours of people aged 50+ who were hospitalized for cardiovascular diseases.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

This publication is another analysis of the results of studies conducted within a research project carried out on the territory of Poland and concerning the quality of life and health behaviours of people aged over 50 years old who were hospitalized due to cardiovascular diseases in Poland.
This study was triggered by the deteriorating health situation of people aged 50+ in Poland in the last two decades. The highest percentage of morbidity and mortality is caused by cardiovascular diseases. The risk factors for cardiovascular diseases include, among others, age, gender, genetic predisposition, as well as incorrect health behaviour, which became a starting point of this study. Standardized questionnaires—the Inventory of Health-Related Behaviour (IHB) and List of Health Criteria (LHC)—were used in the study; they are designed to study the health situation of people of different ages. These tools offer a detailed picture of health behaviours and an analysis of the respondents’ health.

2.2. Studied Population

The study was conducted between April 2018 and December 2018 among 411 subjects aged 50+ who were hospitalized due to cardiovascular disease at the Independent Public Health Care Unit in Sanok (Podkarpackie voivodship in Poland).
The simple random selection method was used, and the study was carried out using 3 survey questionnaires, while the remaining data were obtained from the so-called patients’ ‘health cards’. The research tools allowed the authors to analyse the health situation of the respondents in the last 10 years.
Based on those records, the authors verified the existing cardiovascular diseases and obtained the necessary data for the calculation of indicators such as BMI. The (anonymous) questionnaires, along with patients’ informed consent to participate in the study, were completed by the patients in accordance with the study instructions presented to them earlier.
The criteria for the study group were the following: age—50+; and gender—women and men diagnosed with cardiovascular disease and who were hospitalized due to the diseases in the Independent Public Health Care Unit in Sanok, Podkarpackie voivodship, Poland. The criteria for exclusion from the study group were age under 50, no diagnosed cardiovascular diseases, and gender—not hospitalized men and women.

2.2.1. Description of Research Tools

The method used in the study was a diagnostic survey. The study employed 3 research tools:
  • Authors’ 3-part survey questionnaire. The first part focused on social information; the second part—health of the subjects; and the third part—their lifestyle.
  • The second tool was the standardized questionnaire ‘List of Health Criteria’ (LHC) by Zygmunt Juczyński. LHC contained 24 statements describing the positive elements of three dimensions of health: physical, mental, and social; its results help determine respondents’ preferences in terms of health determinants, discover what the respondents understand by the concept of health, what it means for a given individual to ‘be healthy’, and discover the extent to which health is equated to state, process, or property. The respondents reported their preferences, indicating which of the given statements were important in their health assessment, and which among the selected statements were the most crucial. It resulted in a ranking of all 24 health criteria which characterized the study group. To interpret the results, one needed to consider the distribution of the number of ranks of the individual health criteria. LHC may be useful in activities aimed at modifying health behaviours, as well as in therapy and rehabilitation.
  • The third research tool was the standardized ‘Inventory of Health-Related Behaviour’ (IHB) developed by Zygmunt Juczyński. It consists of 25 statements describing various types of health-related behaviours. It enabled an overall assessment of the intensity of healthy behaviours, as well as 4 categories of health behaviours, namely, correct eating habits, preventive behaviour, positive mental attitude, and health practices. The value of the general indicator of health behaviours ranged from 24 to 120 points. The higher the indicator, the greater the intensity of the declared healthy behaviours. After conversion into standardized units, the indicator was subjected to interpretation as sten scores. Scores 1–4 were considered low, 5–6 average, and 7–10 high. For this scale, normative values for various age and social groups as well as for the healthy and the ill were determined. The author of the questionnaire provided sufficient reliability for the overall score of the IHB (α = 0.85) and for the individual scales (Cronbach’s alpha index ranged from 0.60 to 0.65) [29].

2.2.2. Consent of the Bioethical Committee to Conduct the Study

The study was approved by the Bioethics Committee of the Medical University of Lodz, under number RNN/156/18/KE.

2.2.3. Statistical Analysis

A statistical analysis was carried out in the R program, version 3.5.1. (The R Consortium, Vienna, Austria).
The analysis of the quantitative variables (i.e., expressed in numbers) was performed by calculating the mean, standard deviation, median, quartiles, minimum, and maximum values. The analysis of the qualitative variables (i.e., not expressed in numbers) was conducted by calculating the number and percentage of occurrences of each value. ‘0′ means zero points, i.e., a situation in which a given criteria was not selected by the respondent.
The comparison of the values of quantitative variables in two groups was made using Student’s t-test (when the variable had a normal distribution in these groups) or the Mann–Whitney U test (for a non-normal distribution).
A comparison of the values of the quantitative variables in three or more groups was made using ANOVA analysis (when the variable had a normal distribution in these groups) or the Kruskal–Wallis test (for a non-normal distribution). After detecting statistically significant differences, post-hoc analysis was carried out with Fisher’s Least Significant Difference (LSD) test (normal distribution) or Dunn’s test (non-normal distribution) to identify the statistically significant differences between groups.
Correlations between the quantitative variables were analysed using the Pearson correlation coefficient (when both variables had a normal distribution) or Spearman correlation coefficient (otherwise). The strength of the correlation was interpreted according to the following scheme:
|r| ≥ 0.9—very strong correlation
0.7 ≤ |r| < 0.9—strong correlation
0.5 ≤ |r| < 0.7—medium correlation
0.3 ≤ |r| < 0.5—weak correlation
|r| < 0.3—very week correlation (negligible).
Interpretation based on Hinkle D.E., Wiersma W., Jurs S.G. Applied Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences. 5th ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2003 [30].
The normality of the variable distribution was tested using the Shapiro–Wilk test. The analysis adopted the significance level of 0.05 (thus, all p values below 0.05 were interpreted as significant correlations) [31].

3. Results

The characteristics of the study group are presented in Table 1. The group was dominated by men—there were 223 men (54.26%) and 186 women (45.26%). The age structure of the study group: the average age of the subjects was 69.2 (SD = 9.45 and ranged from 50 to 93); the median was 69.
Body weight of the subject group: 157 subjects (38.20%) were overweight and 125 (30.41%) suffered from class 1 obesity.
Place of residence of the study group: the most numerous group was the inhabitants of cities below 100,000—223 people (54.26%)—while there were 183 people in rural areas (44.53%).
Education of study group: the proportion of people with vocational education was the highest—191 people (46.47%)—while 145 people (35.28%) reported secondary education.
In the study group, the majority, i.e., 313 people (76.16%), were professionally inactive, while 84 people (20.44%) were still active.
The structure of marital status: the largest group were married people—311 subjects (75.67%)—followed by widows and widowers—73 individuals (17.76%).
Analysing the incidence of cardiovascular diseases amongst subjects, it was found that 262 people (63.75%) had coronary heart disease, which was followed by atherosclerosis, 240 people (58.39%), and hypertension, 162 people (39.42%) (Table 1).
Analysis of the health behaviour results according to the Inventory of Health-Related Behaviour (IHB) and the analysis of health assessment criteria according to the List of Health Criteria (LHC) showed that people aged 50+ who were hospitalized due to cardiovascular diseases indicated the following as the important health criteria:
  • not feeling any physical ailments;
  • having all body parts functional;
  • feeling well;
  • eating properly;
  • infrequent need of going to the doctor (Table 2).
As a result of the comparison of the most important statements regarding health, taking into account the age of the respondents, it was found that age significantly and positively correlated with the following criteria (p < 0.05):
  • drinking little or no alcohol;
  • not getting sick, at most with flu, indigestion (rarely);
  • having healthy eyes, hair, and skin.
It should be noted that the abovementioned health criteria were more important for the elderly respondents.
On the other hand, age correlated significantly and negatively with the following criterion (p < 0.05):
  • ability to work without tension and stress.
For elderly patients, this criterion was less important than for the rest of the study group (Table 3).
After analysing the most important statements in the respondents’ opinion, it was found that the perception of 9 out of 24 health criteria significantly depended on gender (p < 0.05).
The studied group of women perceived the following health criteria as more important than men:
  • feeling happy most of the time;
  • eating properly;
  • drinking little or no alcohol;
  • not smoking tobacco;
  • ability to work without tension and stress.
Less important criteria for the studied group of women were:
  • not feeling any physical ailments;
  • not getting sick, at most with flu, indigestion (rarely);
  • having all body parts functional;
  • infrequent need of going to the doctor (Table 4).
After analysing the study results, it was found that the perception of 3 out of 24 health criteria significantly depended on BMI (p < 0.05). A post-hoc analysis was performed, which helped discover significant relationships. The analysis showed that:
  • obese people perceived the criterion ‘eating properly’ as less important than other respondents and obese people perceived the criterion ‘having all body parts functional’ as more important than those with underweight and regular body weight. (Table 5).
After analysing the study results, it was found that the perception of 9 out of 24 health criteria significantly depended on place of residence (p < 0.05).
The respondents who lived in cities perceived the following criteria as more important than those living in a rural environment:
  • eating properly and adequate amount of rest, sleep.
On the other hand, the respondents who lived in cities perceived the following criteria as less important: drinking little or no alcohol and not getting sick, at most with flu, indigestion (rarely) (Table 6).
The statistical analysis showed that the perception of 16 out of 24 health criteria significantly depended on education (p < 0.05). A post-hoc analysis was performed, which helped discover that people with vocational and secondary education perceived the criterion ‘getting along well with other people’ as less important than people with primary and higher education and people with higher education perceived the criteria of ‘knowing how to solve one’s problems’, ‘ability to work without tension and stress’, ‘ability to adapt to life changes’, ‘ability to control one’s own feelings and desires’, ‘accepting oneself, knowing one’s possibilities and limitations’, and ‘having a job, various interests’ as more important than other respondents. (Table 7).
After analysing the study results, it was found that the perception of 3 out of 24 health criteria significantly depended on the professional activity (p < 0.05).
The respondents who were professionally active perceived the following criterion as more important than inactive ones: ability to work without tension and stress.
Meanwhile, the criteria perceived by the professionally active respondents as less important were:
  • getting along well with other people;
  • not getting sick, at most with flu, indigestion (rarely) (Table 8).
The analysis of the comparison of health statements with the marital status of the respondents showed that the perception of 12 out of 24 health criteria significantly depended on marital status (p < 0.05).
Married respondents perceived the following criteria as more important than other respondents: eating properly; adequate amount of rest, sleep; and not smoking tobacco. (Table 9).
The analysis of the study results based on the IHB questionnaire showed that the most common health behaviours were related to ‘health practices’, slightly less common in the area of ‘positive mental attitude’, and the least common in the area of ‘proper eating habits’ and ‘preventive behaviours’ (Table 10).
By correlating the level of health behaviours according to the IHB with individual categories from the LHC, a total of 59 statistically significant relationships were observed (p < 0.05). A list of these dependencies, sorted from the strongest to the weakest, is presented in the table below (Table 11).

4. Discussion and Limitations

The results of the conducted study painted the picture of the health behaviours and health analysis of people aged 50+ who were hospitalized for cardiovascular diseases, depending on the selected descriptive variables.
The study (according to the LHC) showed that the following factors were of great importance in the selection of appropriate criteria determining the health of the respondents: gender, age, education, place of residence, and marital status.
The conducted study has shown that, for the older respondents, the most important factor determining their health is the avoidance of stimulants, while the examined group of women considered the following health criteria as more important than the studied group of men: feeling of happiness and proper nutrition. The respondents from the cities indicated that important criteria for health were proper nutrition, sleep, and rest—more often than their rural counterparts. The education of the respondents had a significant impact on the results obtained: people with higher education chose solving difficult life situations and working without stress as the most important criteria of health. The marital status of the respondents also turned out to be extremely important in choosing the criteria determining health: married respondents considered proper nutrition, as well as sleep and rest as the most important criteria of health.
The study (based on the IHB) has shown that the respondents rated the highest health practices related to proper daily health habits, such as sleep, rest, and regular meals.
Based on the obtained results, the authors initiated a discussion with other authors conducting studies with the same research tools, which helped make a precise summary.
‘Having all body parts functional’ was the most important criterion for people aged 50+ in the study conducted by Nowicki and Ślusarska [8]. It was followed by ‘reaching very old age’. The authors’ own study showed that health was understood by the respondents as property and state, similarly to the study by Bąk-Sosnowska et al. [32]. In the study by G. Nowicki and B. Ślusarska, the respondents gave the greatest importance to health as a property and as an objective [8]. The study by Cybulski et al. also showed that the elderly attached the highest importance to health understood as property, then as an objective, state, process, and a result [14]. Each of the studied groups understood health primary as a property. According to Juczyński, this is an instrumental approach [27]. This fact should not come as a surprise, as the respondents were a sick and hospitalized group, for whom the disease was often an unpleasant experience and a source of stress [8,33,34,35,36].
The analysis of the study results based on the Inventory of Health-Related Behaviour (IHB) showed that amongst subjects the most common health behaviours were related to ‘health practices’, slightly less common in the area of ‘positive mental attitude’ and the least common in the area of ‘proper eating habits’ and ‘preventive behaviours’. Similar observations were made in the studies by Nowicki et al. and Cybulski et al. [8,14]. However, somewhat different results were obtained in studies of elderly people by Prakash et al. and Zanjani et al. There, health behaviours in the area of ‘correct eating habits’ were the most intense [23,24].
When correlating the level of health behaviours according to the IHB with individual categories of the LHC, a total of 59 statistically significant relationships were observed. A positive correlation was found in the group of respondents where the ‘preventive health behaviours’ were more intense; from these, the more important criterion for the respondents was ‘eating properly’. Negative relationships were also found for the respondents for whom ‘correct eating habits’ were important; here, respondents placed more importance on ‘infrequent need of going to the doctor’s’.
The obtained results of the authors’ own study, carried out with the use of the LHC, differed slightly from the results of other cited authors [8,14,15,37,38,39,40,41,42]. According to our respondents aged 50+, ‘being health’ meant above all ‘not feeling any physical ailments’; ‘having all body parts functional’; ‘feeling well’; ‘eating properly’; and ‘infrequent need of going to the doctor’. The differences between the evaluation of health by the elderly presented in the available literature may result from the socio-cultural differences of individual regions of Poland, personal beliefs, general economy, politics, and organization of the society structure [2,8,14,15,35,43]. Cultural determinants—the system of norms and beliefs, patterns of behaviour, as well as all material and non-material products generated by a given social group—play an important role in shaping and choosing healthy behaviours. The determinant of social position is education, which reflects the level of knowledge, including medical knowledge. There was a clear relationship between social status and choice of health behaviours. The higher the education, the higher the requirements for the healthcare, compared to people with lower education [44,45]. Lifestyle plays a fundamental role in maintaining health and prevention of diseases, also in the elderly. Lifestyle elements that have beneficial health effects include correct diet and eating habits, optimal level of physical activity, adequate amount of sleep, satisfactory social relations, skilful use of free time, and knowledge of health prevention [2,8,35,41,46,47,48].
A properly balanced diet is particularly important for maintaining health. Based on the conducted study, the principles of proper nutrition were not perceived by the respondents as a significant factor for preventing or combating already existing cardiovascular diseases. Irrespectively, dietary risk is the most important behavioural health factor in the world, and appears to be the best target in the fight against cardiovascular disease. In the research by Raver A. et al., it has been proven that a proper diet, especially the Mediterranean diet, brings effective results in reducing cardiovascular risk worldwide [49].
However, an incorrect diet and low physical activity are linked to overweight and obesity, which contribute to the occurrence of cardiovascular diseases. Obesity was found in 34.87% of the respondents. Seravalle G. et al. found that obesity, and especially the excessive distribution of visceral fat, was accompanied by several changes at the hormonal, inflammatory, and endothelial levels. These changes induce the stimulation of several other mechanisms that contribute to hypertension and increase cardiovascular morbidity [50].
Given the above, the evidence clearly shows the importance of lifestyle factors (e.g., diet, exercise, and drug use) in the development of cardiovascular disease. Interventions targeted at these behaviours can greatly improve results, and therefore the health and well-being of patients with cardiovascular disease [51].
Summarizing the conducted study, it may be stated that it is important to try and promote health in the hierarchy of values of people aged 50+ and to strengthen their responsibility for their own health and life. Broadly understood education should help raise public health awareness.
As a result of the conducted study, it was found that the most important criteria (according to LHC) that determine health according to the respondents were proper nutrition, adequate sleep, rest, work without stress and tension, and the ability to solve difficult life situations. A particularly high score was given to one of four areas of health behaviours in IHB, namely, ‘health practices’. It proved that the respondents had proper daily health habits, which is very valuable and may determine good health in the future.
The use of standardized questionnaires in further research will allow for a wider observation of health behaviours in people of different ages. Additionally, increasing the number of subjects would help further determine health behaviours, as well as assess the health criteria that the subjects considered as crucial. After more extensive research in the group of people aged 50+ with cardiovascular diseases, more constructive conclusions might be drawn, which would allow specific preventive measures to be taken from the earliest years in order to prevent cardiovascular diseases.

5. Conclusions

Respondents aged 50+ and hospitalized for cardiovascular diseases indicated (based on IHB questionnaire) that health behaviours in the area of ‘health practices’ had the strongest correlation with their health, while the lowest correlation was found in the areas of ‘correct eating habits’ and ‘preventive behaviours’. According to the respondents, the most important criteria determining health (according to the LHC Questionnaire) included ’not feeling any physical ailments’; ‘having all body parts functional’; ‘feeling well’; ‘eating properly’; and ‘infrequent need of going to the doctor’.
Based on the information collected from the respondents, it was found that the most important criteria determining health depended on selected descriptive variables, such as age—it was found that for older respondents, avoidance of stimulants is one of the most important factors determining health; gender—the majority of the studied group of women perceived health in many aspects, including feeling happy and wellbeing; place of residence—respondents from urban environment put emphasis on the role of healthy eating in maintaining good health, as opposed to their counterparts from a rural environment; education—respondents with education higher education paid attention to many factors determining health, as opposed to respondents with lower education, e.g., solving life problems and work without stress; and lastly, marital status—married respondents attached great importance to the principles of proper nutrition in order to maintain health compared to the group of respondents who are not married.
Practical implications: Due to the differences in respondents’ preferences in terms of health behaviours, as well as their approach to their health that depended on gender, age, education, and place of residence, it is particularly important to take measures aimed at providing health education to society, which can effectively overcome the problem of anti-health behaviours, existing health imbalance, and help fight cardiovascular disease.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.G. and K.S.; methodology, E.C. and M.S. (Marian Sygit); software, A.P. and M.S. (Maryna Surmach); validation, D.K. and A.R.; formal analysis, I.G. and K.S.; investigation, M.S. (Marian Sygit) and A.P.; resources, M.S. (Maryna Surmach). and A.R.; data curation, D.K. and A.R.; writing—original draft preparation, I.G. and E.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of Medical University in Lodz Poland (protocol code: RNN/156/18/KE).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data are not publicly available and data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kino, S.; Bernabé, E.; Sabbah, W. Socioeconomic inequality in clusters of health-related behaviours in Europe: Latent class analysis of a cross-sectional European survey. BMC Public Health 2017, 17, 451–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wojtyniak, B.; Goryński, P.; Moskalewicz, B. (Eds.) The Health Situation of the Polish Population and Its Determinants; The National Institute of Public Health-National Institute of Hygiene: Warsaw, Poland, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  3. Younus, A.; Aneni, E.C.; Spatz, E.S.; Osondu, C.U.; Roberson, L.; Ogunmoroti, O.; Malik, R.; Ali, S.S.; Aziz, M.; Feldman, T.; et al. A systematic review of the prevalence and outcomes of ideal cardiovascular health in US and Non-US populations. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2016, 91, 649–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Moor, I.; Spallek, J.; Richter, M. Explaining socioeconomic inequalities in self-rated health: A systematic review of the relative contribution of material, psychosocial and behavioural factors. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2017, 71, 565–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Maclagan, L.C.; Park, J.; Sanmartin, C.; Mathur, K.R.; Roth, D.; Manuel, U.G.; Gershon, A.; Booth, G.L.; Bhatia, S.; Atzema, C.L.; et al. The CANHEART health index: A tool for monitoring the cardiovascular health of the Canadian population. CMAJ 2013, 186, 180–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Jankovic, S.; Stojisavljević, D.; Janković, J.; Eric, M.; Marinkovic, J. Status of cardiovascular health in a transition European country: Findings from a population-based cross-sectional study. Int. J. Public Health 2014, 59, 769–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Zatoński, W. One hundred years of health in Poland. J. Health Inequal. 2019, 5, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nowicki, G.J.; Ślusarska, B.; Piasecka, H.; Bartoszek, A.; Kocka, K.; Deluga, A. The Status of Cardiovascular Health in Rural and Urban Areas of Janów Lubelski District in Eastern Poland: A Population-Based Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 2388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Cabellos-García, A.C.; Castro-Sánchez, E.; Martínez-Sabater, A.; Díaz-Herrera, M.Á.; Ocaña-Ortiz, A.; Juárez-Vela, R.; Gea-Caballero, V. Relationship between Determinants of Health, Equity, and Dimensions of Health Literacy in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Stefler, D.; Pikhart, H.; Jankovic, N.; Kubinova, R.; Pajak, A.; Malyutina, S.; Simonova, G.; Feskens, E.J.M.; Peasey, A.; Bobak, M. Healthy diet indicator and mortality in Eastern European populations: Prospective evidence from the HAPIEE cohort. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2014, 68, 1346–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. D’Addario, M.; Cappelletti, E.R.; Sarini, M.; Greco, A.; Steca, P. The TTCYB Study Protocol: A Tailored Print Message Intervention to Improve Cardiovascular Patients’ Lifestyles. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Fernández, D.; Brotons, C.; Moral, I.; Bulc, M.; Afonso, M.; Akan, H.; Pinto, S.; Vucak, J.; Martins, C.M.D.S. Lifestyle behaviours in patients with established cardiovascular diseases: A European observational study. BMC Fam. Pract. 2019, 20, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Strzelecki, Z.; Szymborski, J. Morbidity and Mortality of Cardiovascular Diseases and the Demographic Situation of Poland Government Population Council. Available online: https://bip.stat.gov.pl/files/gfx/bip/pl/zamowieniapubliczne/426/248/1/81_gp_rrl_2015_monografia_kardiologiczna.pdf (accessed on 19 December 2020).
  14. Cybulski, M.; Krajewska-Kulak, E.; Jamiolkowski, J. Preferred health behaviors and quality of life of the elderly people in Poland. Clin. Interv. Aging 2015, 10, 1555–1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Deluga, A.; Kosicka, B.; Dobrowolska, B.; Chrzan-Rodak, A.; Jurek, K.; Wrońska, I.; Ksykiewicz-Dorota, A.; Jedrych, M.; Drop, B. Lifestyle of the elderly living in rural and urban areas measured by the FANTASTIC Life Inventory. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2018, 25, 562–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Nyberg, S.T.; Singh-Manoux, A.; Pentti, J.; Madsen, I.E.H.; Sabia, S.; Alfredsson, L.; Bjorner, J.B.; Borritz, M.; Burr, H.; Goldberg, M.; et al. Association of Healthy Lifestyle With Years Lived without Major Chronic Diseases. JAMA Intern. Med. 2020, 180, 760–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Tang, K.L.; Rashid, R.; Godley, J.; A Ghali, W. Association between subjective social status and cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular risk factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2016, 6, e010137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Havranek, E.P.; Mujahid, M.S.; Barr, D.A.; Blair, I.V.; Cohen, M.S.; Cruz-Flores, S.; Davey-Smith, G.; Dennison-Himmelfarb, C.R.; Lauer, M.S.; Lockwood, D.W.; et al. Social determinants of risk and outcomes for cardiovascular disease. A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2015, 132, 873–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. De La Cruz, N.; Shabaneh, O.; Appiah, D. The Association of Ideal Cardiovascular Health and Ocular Diseases Among US Adults. Am. J. Med. 2021, 134, 252–259.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Townsend, N.; Wilson, L.; Bhatnagar, P.; Wickramasinghe, K.; Rayner, M.; Nichols, M. Cardiovascular disease in Europe: Epidemiological update 2016. Eur. Hear. J. 2016, 37, 3232–3245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Benjamin, E.J.; Blaha, M.J.; Chiuve, S.E.; Cushman, M.; Das, S.R.; de Ferranti, S.D.; Floyd, J.; Fornage, M.; Gillespie, C.; Isasi, C.R.; et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2017 Update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2017, 135, e146–e603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Folsom, A.R.; Yatsuya, H.; Nettleton, J.A.; Lutsey, P.L.; Cushman, M.; Rosamond, W.D. ARIC Study Investigators Community prevalence of ideal cardiovascular health, by the American Heart Association definition, and relation to cardiovascular disease incidence. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2011, 57, 1690–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Prakash, S.J.; Bihari, G.S.; Kumar, S.A. Lifestyle habits and diseases amongst rural geriatrics population. Int. J. Community Med. Public Health 2016, 3, 957–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Zanjani, S.; Tol, A.; Mohebbi, B.; Sadeghi, R.; Jalyani, K.N.; Moradi, A. Determinants of healthy lifestyle and its related factors among elderly people. J. Educ. Health Promot. 2015, 4, 103–115. [Google Scholar]
  25. He, Z.; Cheng, Z.; Shao, T.; Liu, C.; Shao, P.; Bishwajit, G.; Feng, D.; Feng, Z. Factors influencing health knowledge and behaviors among the elderly in rural China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Selivanova, A.; Cramm, J.M. The relationship between healthy behaviors and health outcomes among older adults in Russia. BMC Public Health 2014, 14, 1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Goryakin, Y.; Aldea, A.; Lerouge, A.; Spica, V.R.; Nante, N.; Vuik, S.; Devaux, M.; Cecchini, M. Promoting sport and physical activity in Italy: A cost-effectiveness analysis of seven innovative public health policies. Ann. Ig. 2019, 31, 614–625. [Google Scholar]
  28. Biernat, E.; Piątkowska, M. Recreational Physical Activity of Poles in Europe. Report for the Department of Sports Analysis and Policy of the Ministry of Sport and Tourism. Warsaw, Poland. Available online: https://www.msit.gov.pl/ (accessed on 12 December 2020).
  29. Juczyński, Z. Narzędzia Pomiaru w Promocji I Psychologii Zdrowia [Tools for Health Promotion and Psychology of Health], 2nd ed.; Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych: Warszawa, Poland, 2009; pp. 110–116. [Google Scholar]
  30. Witz, K.; Hinkle, D.E.; Wiersma, W.; Jurs, S.G. Applied Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. J. Educ. Stat. 1990, 15, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2018; Available online: https://www.R-project.org (accessed on 6 November 2020).
  32. Bąk-Sosnowska, M.; Skrzypulec-Plinta, V. Health behaviors, health definitions, sense of coherence, and general practitioners’ attitudes towards obesity and diagnosing obesity in patients. Arch. Med Sci. 2017, 13, 433–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Stehr, P.; Weber, W.; Rossmann, C. Health information behavior of 65+: Reaching older target groups. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundh. Gesundh. 2021, 64, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Benziger, C.P.; Zavala-Loayza, J.A.; Bernabe-Ortiz, A.; Gilman, R.H.; Checkley, W.; Smeeth, L.; Malaga, G.; Miranda, J.J. Low prevalence of ideal cardiovascular health in Peru. Heart 2018, 104, 1251–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Vandenheede, H.; Vikhireva, O.; Pikhart, H.; Kubinova, R.; Malyutina, S.; Pajak, A.; Tamosiunas, A.; Peasey, A.; Simonova, G.; Topor-Madry, R.; et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in all-cause mortality in the Czech Republic, Russia, Poland and Lithuania in the 2000s: Findings from the HAPIEE Study. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2013, 68, 297–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Piepoli, M.F.; Hoes, A.W.; Agewall, S.; Albus, C.; Brotons, C.; Catapano, A.L.; Cooney, M.T.; Corrà, U.; Cosyns, B.; Deaton, C.; et al. 2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: The Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts): Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention& Rehabilitation (EACPR). Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2016, 23, NP1–NP96. [Google Scholar]
  37. Doryńska, A.; Polak, M.; Kozel, M.; Szafraniec, K.; Piotrowski, W.; Bielecki, W.; Drygas, W.; Kozakiewicz, K.; Piwoński, J.; Tykarski, A.; et al. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors in Krakow and in the whole Poland adult population. Results from the WOBASZ study and Polish arm of the HAPPIE project. Przegl. Epidemiol. 2015, 69, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  38. Unger, E.; Diez-Roux, A.V.; Lloyd-Jones, D.M.; Mujahid, M.S.; Nettleton, J.A.; Bertoni, A.; Badon, S.E.; Ning, H.; Allen, N.B. Association of Neighborhood Characteristics With Cardiovascular Health in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes 2014, 7, 524–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Lloyd-Jones, D.M.; Hong, Y.; Labarthe, D.; Mozaffarian, D.; Appel, L.J.; Van Horn, L.; Greenlund, K.; Daniels, S.; Nichol, G.; Tomaselli, G.F.; et al. American heart association strategic planning task force and statistics committee defining and setting national goals for cardiovascular health promotion and disease reduction: The American heart association’s strategic impact goal through 2020 and beyond. Circulation 2010, 121, 586–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Roger, V.L.; Go, A.S.; Lloyd-Jones, D.M.; Benjamin, E.J.; Berry, J.D.; Borden, W.B.; Bravata, D.M.; Dai, S.; Ford, E.S.; Fox, C.S.; et al. Executive summary: Heart disease and stroke statistics-2012 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2012, 34, 125–188. [Google Scholar]
  41. Rywik, S.; Kupść, W.; Piotrowski, W.; Broda, G.; Piwoński, J.; Kurjata, P.; Waśkiewicz, A.; Gaździk, D. A multicenter na-tionwide study of the Polish population’s health—WOBASZ project. Methodical assumptions and logistics. Kardiol. Pol. 2005, 63 (Suppl. S4), 605–613. [Google Scholar]
  42. Manczuk, M.; Vaidean, G.; Dehghan, M.; Vedanthan, R.; Boffetta, P.; Zatonski, W.A. Ideal cardiovascular health is associated with self-rated health status. The Polish Norwegian Study (PONS). Int. J. Cardiol. 2017, 230, 549–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Jaźwiec, P.; Gać, P.; Poręba, M.; Sobieszczańska, M.; Mazur, G.; Poręba, R. The cardiovascular health score and the volume of carotid body in computed tomography angiography in patients with arterial hypertension. J. Am. Soc. Hypertens. 2018, 12, 551–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Samet, J. The environment and health inequalities: Problems and solutions. J. Health Inequal. 2019, 5, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Janković, S.; Stojisavljević, D.; Erić, M.; Marinković, J. Association of socioeconomic status measured by education, and cardiovascular health: A population-based cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2014, 4, e005222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Tam, H.L.; Wong, E.M.L.; Cheung, K. Effectiveness of Educational Interventions on Adherence to Lifestyle Modifications Among Hypertensive Patients: An Integrative Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Kim, J.I.; Sillah, A.; Boucher, J.L.; Sidebottom, A.C.; Knickelbine, T. Prevalence of the American Heart Association’s “Ideal Cardiovascular Health” Metrics in a Rural, Cross-sectional, Community-Based Study: The Heart of New Ulm Project. J. Am. Hear. Assoc. 2013, 2, e000058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Moghaddam, M.M.; Mohebi, R.; Hosseini, F.; Lotfaliany, M.; Azizi, F.; Saadat, N.; Hadaegh, F. Distribution of ideal cardiovascular health in a community-based cohort of Middle East population. Ann. Saudi Med. 2014, 34, 134–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ravera, A.; Carubelli, V.; Sciatti, E.; Bonadei, I.; Gorga, E.; Cani, D.; Vizzardi, E.; Metra, M.; Lombardi, C. Nutrition and Cardiovascular Disease: Finding the Perfect Recipe for Cardiovascular Health. Nutrients 2016, 8, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Seravalle, G.; Grassi, G. Obesity and hypertension. Pharmacol. Res. 2017, 122, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Doughty, K.N.; Del Pilar, N.X.; Audette, A.; Katz, D.L. Lifestyle Medicine and the Management of Cardiovascular Disease. Curr. Cardiol. Rep. 2017, 19, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Characteristics of the respondents.
Table 1. Characteristics of the respondents.
Characteristics of the RespondentsN%
GenderWomen18645.53
Men22354.47
No answer20.49
Age (in years)N—411--
Mean—69.2--
SD—9.45--
Median—69--
Min—50--
Max—93--
Q1—62--
Q3—76--
BMIUnderweight [17–18.5]20.49
Correct weight [18.5–25]10024.33
Overweight [25–30]15738.20
Obesity [30–35]12530.41
Class 2 obesity [35–40]153.65
Class 3 obesity [>40]81.95
No data available (weight and/or height)40.97
Place of residenceCity < 100,000 inhabitants22354.26
City > 100,000 inhabitants30.73
Rural area18344.53
No answer20.49
EducationPrimary5012.17
Vocational19146.47
Secondary14535.28
Higher225.35
No answer30.73
Professional activityProfessionally active8420.44
Professionally inactive31376.16
No answer143.41
Marital statusSingle122.92
Married31175.67
In separation20.49
Divorced71.70
Widow/widower7317.76
In a partnership51.22
No answer10.24
Treatment of cardiovascular diseaseHypertension16239.42
Atherosclerosis24058.39
Ischemic heart disease26263.75
Rhythm and cardiac conduction disorders10525.55
Heart defects (congenital and acquired)297.06
Varicose veins of the lower extremities10926.52
Venous thrombosis286.81
Other diseases4310.46
N—number of respondents; %—percentage of respondents; SD—average age of respondents; Q—quartile.
Table 2. List of Health Criteria of the studied group.
Table 2. List of Health Criteria of the studied group.
CriterionNMeanSDMedianMinMaxQ1Q3
reaching very old age4110.010.1200100
feeling happy most of the time4110.170.7500500
getting along well with other people4110.551.0900501
knowing how to solve one’s own problems4110.451.0800500
eating properly4111.081.3100502
adequate amount of rest, sleep4110.620.9100401
drinking little or no alcohol4110.220.7500500
not smoking tobacco4110.881.1610501
having a correct body weight4110.090.4800400
taking medication rarely4110.270.8400400
having a good mood4110.240.8500500
not feeling any physical ailments4113.111.7740524
ability to work without tension and stress4110.250.9300500
not getting sick, at most with flu, indigestion (rarely)4110.250.8700500
having healthy eyes, hair and skin4110.030.2900400
ability to adapt to life changes4110.481.2300500
ability to enjoy life4110.180.7700500
being responsible4110.050.3700400
ability to control one’s own feelings and desires4110.020.1900300
having all body parts functional4112.452.3430605
accepting oneself, knowing one’s possibilities and limitations4110.41.1200500
having a job, various interests4110.130.600500
feeling well4111.72.0100604
infrequent need of going to the doctor41111.6900502
N—number of respondents; SD—average age of respondents; Q—quartile.
Table 3. Correlations of health statements with the age of the respondents.
Table 3. Correlations of health statements with the age of the respondents.
CriterionCorrelation with Age
Correlation Coefficientp *Correlation DirectionCorrelation Strength
reaching very old age−0.021p = 0.673 ------
feeling happy most of the time0.051p = 0.304 ------
getting along well with other people0.059p = 0.234 ------
knowing how to solve one’s own problems−0.067p = 0.174 ------
eating properly0.009p = 0.858 ------
adequate amount of rest, sleep−0.032p = 0.523 ------
drinking little or no alcohol0.115p = 0.02 positivevery weak
not smoking tobacco0.026p = 0.593 ------
having a correct body weight−0.037p = 0.457 ------
taking medication rarely−0.002p = 0.976 ------
having a good mood−0.038p = 0.442 ------
not feeling any physical ailments0.021p = 0.671 ------
ability to work without tension and stress−0.174p < 0.001 negativevery weak
not getting sick, at most with flu, indigestion (rarely)0.159p = 0.001 positivevery weak
having healthy eyes, hair and skin0.1p = 0.044 positivevery weak
ability to adapt to life changes−0.054p = 0.271 ------
ability to enjoy life−0.064p = 0.198 ------
being responsible−0.055p = 0.268 ------
ability to control one’s own feelings and desires−0.068p = 0.166 ------
having all body parts functional0.001p = 0.978 ------
accepting oneself, knowing one’s possibilities and limitations−0.069p = 0.163 ------
having a job, various interests−0.019p = 0.703 ------
feeling well0.09p = 0.067 ------
infrequent need of going to the doctor0.037p = 0.46 ------
* p = Non-normal distribution of both correlated variables, Pearson correlation coefficient; NP = Non-normal distribution of at least one of the correlated variables, Spearman’s correlation coefficient.
Table 4. Correlations of health statements with the gender of the respondents.
Table 4. Correlations of health statements with the gender of the respondents.
CriterionWomenMenp *
reaching very old ageMedian000.806
Quartile0–00–0
feeling happy most of the timeMedian000.048
Quartile0–00–0
getting along well with other peopleMedian000.325
Quartile0–10–0
knowing how to solve one’s own problemsMedian000.537
Quartile0–00–0
eating properlyMedian0.500.012
Quartile0–30–2
adequate amount of rest, sleepMedian000.581
Quartile0–10–1
drinking little or no alcoholMedian000.002
Quartile0–00–0
not smoking tobaccoMedian100.001
Quartile0–10–1
having a correct body weightMedian000.76
Quartile0–00–0
taking medication rarelyMedian000.065
Quartile0–00–0
having a good moodMedian000.995
Quartile0–00–0
not feeling any physical ailmentsMedian440.002
Quartile0–43–5
ability to work without tension and stressMedian000.01
Quartile0–00–0
not getting sick, at most with flu, indigestion (rarely)Median000.028
Quartile0–00–0
having healthy eyes, hair and skinMedian000.857
Quartile0–00–0
ability to adapt to life changesMedian000.14
Quartile0–00–0
ability to enjoy lifeMedian000.261
Quartile0–00–0
being responsibleMedian000.322
Quartile0–00–0
ability to control one’s own feelings and desiresMedian000.855
Quartile0–00–0
having all body parts functionalMedian040.023
Quartile0–50–5
accepting oneself, knowing one’s possibilities and limitationsMedian000.301
Quartile0–00–0
having a job, various interestsMedian000.37
Quartile0–00–0
feeling wellMedian000.283
Quartile0–40–4
infrequent need of going to the doctorMedian000.001
Quartile0–00–3
* p = Normal distribution in groups, Student’s t-test; NP = Non-normal distribution in groups, Mann–Whitney U test.
Table 5. Correlations of health statements with the BMI of the respondents.
Table 5. Correlations of health statements with the BMI of the respondents.
CriterionUnderweight, Correct WeightOverweightObesityp *
reaching very old ageMedian0000.249
Quartile0–00–00–0
feeling happy most of the timeMedian0000.203
Quartile0–00–00–0
getting along well with other peopleMedian0000.116
Quartile0–10–10–0
knowing how to solve one’s own problemsMedian0000.221
Quartile0–00–00–0
eating properlyMedian0100.025
Quartile0–2.750–20–2Under.Corr.Over > O
adequate amount of rest, sleepMedian0000.845
Quartile0–10–10–1
drinking little or no alcoholMedian0000.248
Quartile0–00–00–0
not smoking tobaccoMedian110.50.544
Quartile0–20–10–1
having a correct body weightMedian0000.652
Quartile0–00–00–0
taking medication rarelyMedian0000.565
Quartile0–00–00–0
having a good moodMedian0000.349
Quartile0–00–00–0
not feeling any physical ailmentsMedian4440.129
Quartile0–43–42–4
ability to work without tension and stressMedian0000.236
Quartile0–00–00–0
not getting sick, at most with flu, indigestion (rarely)Median0000.769
Quartile0–00–00–0
having healthy eyes, hair and skinMedian0000.272
Quartile0–00–00–0
ability to adapt to life changesMedian0000.504
Quartile0–00–00–0
ability to enjoy lifeMedian0000.835
Quartile0–00–00–0
being responsibleMedian0000.564
Quartile0–00–00–0
ability to control one’s own feelings and desiresMedian0000.239
Quartile0–00–00–0
having all body parts functionalMedian0340.038
Quartile0–50–50–5O > Under-Corr
accepting oneself, knowing one’s possibilities and limitationsMedian0000.795
Quartile0–00–00–0
having a job, various interestsMedian0000.053
Quartile0–00–00–0
feeling wellMedian1000.235
Quartile0–40–30–4
infrequent need of going to the doctorMedian0000.01
Quartile0–0.750–00–3O > Under-Corr.Over
* p = Normal distribution in groups, ANOVA + results of post-hoc analysis (Fisher’s LSD test); NP = Non-normal distribution in groups, Kruskal–Wallis test + post-hoc analysis results (Dunn’s test).
Table 6. Correlations of health statements with the place of residence of the respondents.
Table 6. Correlations of health statements with the place of residence of the respondents.
CriterionUrbanRuralp *
reaching very old ageMedian000.796
Quartile0–00–0
feeling happy most of the timeMedian000.316
Quartile0–00–0
getting along well with other peopleMedian000.229
Quartile0–00–1
knowing how to solve one’s own problemsMedian000.49
Quartile0–00–0
eating properlyMedian100.003
Quartile0–20–2
adequate amount of rest, sleepMedian000.011
Quartile0–20–1
drinking little or no alcoholMedian000.01
Quartile0–00–0
not smoking tobaccoMedian100.551
Quartile0–10–1
having a correct body weightMedian000.019
Quartile0–00–0
taking medication rarelyMedian000.428
Quartile0–00–0
having a good moodMedian000.543
Quartile0–00–0
not feeling any physical ailmentsMedian440.832
Quartile2.25–42–4
ability to work without tension and stressMedian000.014
Quartile0–00–0
not getting sick, at most with flu, indigestion (rarely)Median000.002
Quartile0–00–0
having healthy eyes, hair and skinMedian000.223
Quartile0–00–0
ability to adapt to life changesMedian000.323
Quartile0–00–0
ability to enjoy lifeMedian000.591
Quartile0–00–0
being responsibleMedian000.764
Quartile0–00–0
ability to control one’s own feelings and desiresMedian000.071
Quartile0–00–0
having all body parts functionalMedian330.369
Quartile0–50–5
accepting oneself, knowing one’s possibilities and limitationsMedian000.006
Quartile0–00–0
having a job, various interestsMedian000.869
Quartile0–00–0
feeling wellMedian020.01
Quartile0–30–4
infrequent need of going to the doctorMedian000.001
Quartile0–00–3
* p = Normal distribution in groups, Student’s t-test; NP = Non-normal distribution in groups, Mann–Whitney U test.
Table 7. Correlations of health statements with the education of the respondents.
Table 7. Correlations of health statements with the education of the respondents.
CriterionPrimaryVocationalSecondaryHigherp *
reaching very old ageMedian00000.23
Quartile0–00–00–00–0
feeling happy most of the timeMedian00000.147
Quartile0–00–00–00–0
getting along well with other peopleMedian10010.001
Quartile0–20–00–10–2H,P > S,V
knowing how to solve one’s own problemsMedian00000.001
Quartile0–10–00–00–2H > P,V,S
eating properlyMedian01100.001
Quartile0–00–20–30–2S,V,H > P
adequate amount of rest, sleepMedian00000.001
Quartile0–00–10–20–0S,V > H,P
drinking little or no alcoholMedian00000.001
Quartile0–10–00–00–0P > S,V,H
not smoking tobaccoMedian01100.689
Quartile0–20–10–10–1.75
having a correct body weightMedian00000.007
Quartile0–00–00–00–0S > V,P,H
taking medication rarelyMedian00000.334
Quartile0–00–00–00–0
having a good moodMedian00000.178
Quartile0–00–00–00–0
not feeling any physical ailmentsMedian4.54400.001
Quartile3–53–42–40–2.5P > V,S,H V,S > H
ability to work without tension and stressMedian0002.50.001
Quartile0–00–00–00–4H > S,V,P
not getting sick, at most with flu, indigestion (rarely)Median00000.001
Quartile0–0.750–00–00–0P > V,S,H V > S, H
having healthy eyes, hair and skinMedian00000.146
Quartile0–00–00–00–0
ability to adapt to life changesMedian00020.001
Quartile0–00–00–00–3.75H >P, S,V
ability to enjoy lifeMedian00000.084
Quartile0–00–00–00–0
being responsibleMedian00000.747
Quartile0–00–00–00–0
ability to control one’s own feelings and desiresMedian00000.001
Quartile0–00–00–00–0H > S,P,V
having all body parts functionalMedian05300.001
Quartile0–20–50–50–0V > S,P,H S > P,H
accepting oneself, knowing one’s possibilities and limitationsMedian00000.012
Quartile0–00–00–00–0H,S,V > P
having a job, various interestsMedian00000.047
Quartile0–00–00–00–0H > S,V,P
feeling wellMedian20000.042
Quartile0–40–3.50–40–2.75P > V,H
infrequent need of going to the doctorMedian10000.001
Quartile0–20–30–00–0P > S,H V,S > H
* p = Normal distribution in groups, ANOVA + results of post-hoc analysis (Fisher’s LSD test); NP = Non-normal distribution in groups, Kruskal–Wallis test + post-hoc analysis results (Dunn’s test).
Table 8. Correlations of health statements with the professional activity of the respondents.
Table 8. Correlations of health statements with the professional activity of the respondents.
CriterionProfessionally ActiveProfessionally Inactivep *
reaching very old ageMedian000.464
Quartile0–00–0
feeling happy most of the timeMedian000.389
Quartile0–00–0
getting along well with other peopleMedian000.041
Quartile0–00–1
knowing how to solve one’s own problemsMedian000.589
Quartile0–00–0
eating properlyMedian100.052
Quartile0–2.250–2
adequate amount of rest, sleepMedian000.245
Quartile0–1.250–1
drinking little or no alcoholMedian000.258
Quartile0–00–0
not smoking tobaccoMedian100.566
Quartile0–10–1
having a correct body weightMedian000.491
Quartile0–00–0
taking medication rarelyMedian000.879
Quartile0–00–0
having a good moodMedian000.812
Quartile0–00–0
not feeling any physical ailmentsMedian440.571
Quartile2–42–4
ability to work without tension and stressMedian000.012
Quartile0–00–0
not getting sick, at most with flu, indigestion (rarely)Median000.001
Quartile0–00–0
having healthy eyes, hair and skinMedian000.3
Quartile0–00–0
ability to adapt to life changesMedian000.914
Quartile0–00–0
ability to enjoy lifeMedian000.65
Quartile0–00–0
being responsibleMedian000.14
Quartile0–00–0
ability to control one’s own feelings and desiresMedian000.156
Quartile0–00–0
having all body parts functionalMedian3.530.372
Quartile0–50–5
accepting oneself, knowing one’s possibilities and limitationsMedian000.153
Quartile0–00–0
having a job, various interestsMedian000.435
Quartile0–00–0
feeling wellMedian000.105
Quartile0–30–4
infrequent need of going to the doctorMedian000.109
Quartile0–00–2
* p = Normal distribution in groups, Student’s t-test; NP = Non-normal distribution in groups, Mann–Whitney U test.
Table 9. Correlations of health statements with the marital status of the respondents.
Table 9. Correlations of health statements with the marital status of the respondents.
CriterionMarriedOtherp *
reaching very old ageMedian000.668
Quartile0–00–0
feeling happy most of the timeMedian000.024
Quartile0–00–0
getting along well with other peopleMedian000.007
Quartile0–00–1
knowing how to solve one’s own problemsMedian000.776
Quartile0–00–0
eating properlyMedian100.001
Quartile0–20–1
adequate amount of rest, sleepMedian000.002
Quartile0–10–0
drinking little or no alcoholMedian000.006
Quartile0–00–0
not smoking tobaccoMedian100.027
Quartile0–10–1
having a correct body weightMedian000.326
Quartile0–00–0
taking medication rarelyMedian000.856
Quartile0–00–0
having a good moodMedian000.787
Quartile0–00–0
not feeling any physical ailmentsMedian430.036
Quartile2.5–40–4
ability to work without tension and stressMedian000.036
Quartile0–00–0
not getting sick, at most with flu, indigestion (rarely)Median000.036
Quartile0–00–0
having healthy eyes, hair and skinMedian000.226
Quartile0–00–0
ability to adapt to life changesMedian000.167
Quartile0–00–0
ability to enjoy lifeMedian000.611
Quartile0–00–0
being responsibleMedian000.769
Quartile0–00–0
ability to control one’s own feelings and desiresMedian000.259
Quartile0–00–0
having all body parts functionalMedian400.002
Quartile0–50–4
accepting oneself, knowing one’s possibilities and limitationsMedian000.044
Quartile0–00–0
having a job, various interestsMedian000.326
Quartile0–00–0
feeling wellMedian020.001
Quartile0–30–4
infrequent need of going to the doctorMedian000.25
Quartile0–10–2
* p = Normal distribution in groups, Student’s t-test; NP = Non-normal distribution in groups, Mann–Whitney U test.
Table 10. Degree of intensity of specific categories of health behaviours according to the Inventory of Health-Related Behaviour (IHB) amongst respondents.
Table 10. Degree of intensity of specific categories of health behaviours according to the Inventory of Health-Related Behaviour (IHB) amongst respondents.
IHB Sub-ScalesNMeanSDMedianMinMaxQ1Q3
Correct eating habits4113.280.753.17152.834
Preventive behaviours41130.6231.174.52.673.67
Positive mental attitude4113.590.523.831.334.673.334
Health practices4113.610.533.671.674.833.334
Table 11. The level of health behaviours according to the Inventory of Health-Related Behaviour (IHB) versus number of selections of individual categories of the List of Health Criteria (LHC).
Table 11. The level of health behaviours according to the Inventory of Health-Related Behaviour (IHB) versus number of selections of individual categories of the List of Health Criteria (LHC).
LHCIHBCorrelation CoefficientpCorrelation DirectionCorrelation Strength
Eating properlyPreventive behaviours0.521p < 0.001 positiveAverage
Eating properlyOverall IHB result0.492p < 0.001 positiveWeak
Eating properlyCorrect eating habits0.414p < 0.001 positiveWeak
Eating properlyPositive mental attitude0.414p < 0.001 positiveWeak
Adequate amount of rest, sleepPreventive behaviours0.407p < 0.001 positiveWeak
Infrequent need of going to the doctorCorrect eating habits−0.392p < 0.001 negativeWeak
Infrequent need of going to the doctorOverall IHB result−0.354p < 0.001 negativeWeak
Adequate amount of rest, sleepOverall IHB result0.332p < 0.001 positiveWeak
Not smoking tobaccoPositive mental attitude0.315p < 0.001 positiveWeak
Adequate amount of rest, sleepPositive mental attitude0.313p < 0.001 positiveWeak
Not smoking tobaccoOverall IHB result0.302p < 0.001 positiveWeak
Eating properlyHealth practices0.296p < 0.001 positivevery weak
Feeling wellPreventive behaviours−0.295p < 0.001 negativevery weak
Feeling wellOverall IHB result−0.291p < 0.001 negativevery weak
Infrequent need of going to the doctorPreventive behaviours−0.285p < 0.001 negativevery weak
Not getting sick, at most with flu, indigestion (rarely)Overall IHB result−0.279p < 0.001 negativevery weak
Feeling wellPositive mental attitude−0.276p < 0.001 negativevery weak
Infrequent need of going to the doctorHealth practices−0.274p < 0.001 negativevery weak
Not smoking tobaccoPreventive behaviours0.266p < 0.001 positivevery weak
Not getting sick, at most with flu, indigestion (rarely)Preventive behaviours−0.263p < 0.001 negativevery weak
Having all body parts functionalPreventive behaviours0.263p < 0.001 positivevery weak
Not getting sick, at most with flu, indigestion (rarely)Correct eating habits−0.262p < 0.001 negativevery weak
Feeling wellCorrect eating habits−0.262p < 0.001 negativevery weak
Adequate amount of rest, sleepCorrect eating habits0.251p < 0.001 positivevery weak
Not getting sick, at most with flu, indigestion (rarely)Positive mental attitude−0.239p < 0.001 negativevery weak
Infrequent need of going to the doctorPositive mental attitude−0.238p < 0.001 negativevery weak
Knowing how to solve one’s own problemsPositive mental attitude−0.232p < 0.001 negativevery weak
Not smoking tobaccoHealth practices0.229p < 0.001 positivevery weak
Getting along well with other peoplePreventive behaviours−0.224p < 0.001 negativevery weak
Having all body parts functionalPositive mental attitude0.22p < 0.001 positivevery weak
Not smoking tobaccoCorrect eating habits0.217p < 0.001 positivevery weak
Ability to adapt to life changesPositive mental attitude−0.196p < 0.001 negativevery weak
Having all body parts functionalOverall IHB result0.186p < 0.001 positivevery weak
Knowing how to solve one’s own problemsPreventive behaviours−0.181p < 0.001 negativevery weak
Not getting sick, at most with flu, indigestion (rarely)Health practices−0.167p = 0.001 negativevery weak
Taking medication rarelyCorrect eating habits−0.158p = 0.001 negativevery weak
Taking medication rarelyHealth practices−0.157p = 0.001 negativevery weak
Getting along well with other peoplePositive mental attitude−0.148p = 0.003 negativevery weak
Ability to work without tension and stressCorrect eating habits0.142p = 0.004 positivevery weak
Ability to adapt to life changesPreventive behaviours−0.139p = 0.005 negativevery weak
Taking medication rarelyOverall IHB result−0.136p = 0.006 negativevery weak
Feeling wellHealth practices−0.133p = 0.007 negativevery weak
Ability to enjoy lifePositive mental attitude0.13p = 0.008 positivevery weak
Being responsibleOverall IHB result−0.129p = 0.009 negativevery weak
Taking medication rarelyPreventive behaviours−0.123p = 0.013 negativevery weak
Being responsiblePreventive behaviours−0.123p = 0.013 negativevery weak
Knowing how to solve one’s own problemsOverall IHB result−0.122p = 0.013 negativevery weak
Adequate amount of rest, sleepHealth practices0.122p = 0.013 positivevery weak
Ability to control one’s own feelings and desiresCorrect eating habits0.121p = 0.014 positivevery weak
Being responsiblePositive mental attitude−0.114p = 0.021 negativevery weak
Being responsibleCorrect eating habits−0.113p = 0.021 negativevery weak
Ability to enjoy lifeOverall IHB result0.109p = 0.027 positivevery weak
Getting along well with other peopleOverall IHB result−0.104p = 0.035 negativevery weak
Reaching very old ageHealth practices−0.103p = 0.036 negativevery weak
Feeling happy most of the timeCorrect eating habits0.102p = 0.039 positivevery weak
Ability to work without tension and stressPreventive behaviours0.102p = 0.04 positivevery weak
Ability to enjoy lifeCorrect eating habits0.1p = 0.044 positivevery weak
Ability to enjoy lifeHealth practices0.099p = 0.045 positivevery weak
Reaching very old ageCorrect eating habits−0.098p = 0.046 negativevery weak
* p = Normal distribution of both correlated variables, Pearson correlation coefficient; NP = Non-normal distribution of at least one of the correlated variables, Spearman’s correlation coefficient.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gąska, I.; Sygit, K.; Cipora, E.; Sygit, M.; Pacian, A.; Surmach, M.; Kaleta, D.; Rzeźnicki, A. Assessment of the Health Behaviours and Value-Based Health Analysis of People Aged 50+ Who Were Hospitalized Due to Cardiovascular Disease. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 4221. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18084221

AMA Style

Gąska I, Sygit K, Cipora E, Sygit M, Pacian A, Surmach M, Kaleta D, Rzeźnicki A. Assessment of the Health Behaviours and Value-Based Health Analysis of People Aged 50+ Who Were Hospitalized Due to Cardiovascular Disease. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(8):4221. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18084221

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gąska, Izabela, Katarzyna Sygit, Elżbieta Cipora, Marian Sygit, Anna Pacian, Maryna Surmach, Dorota Kaleta, and Adam Rzeźnicki. 2021. "Assessment of the Health Behaviours and Value-Based Health Analysis of People Aged 50+ Who Were Hospitalized Due to Cardiovascular Disease" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 8: 4221. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18084221

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop