You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
MDPIMDPI
Search all articles
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open Access

16 April 2021

Assessment of the Health Behaviours and Value-Based Health Analysis of People Aged 50+ Who Were Hospitalized Due to Cardiovascular Disease

,
,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Medical Institute, Jan Godek State University in Sanok, 38-500 Sanok, Poland
2
Faculty of Health Sciences, Calisia University, 62-800 Kalisz, Poland
3
Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland
4
Head of the Department of Public Health and Health Services, Grodno State Medical University, 230009 Grodno, Belarus
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health2021, 18(8), 4221;https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18084221
This article belongs to the Special Issue Community and Family-Focused Public Health and Sustainable Development
Version Notes
Order Reprints
Review Reports

Abstract

Introduction: The basic determinant of healthy behaviour—among other human behaviours—is the fact that it consistently affects health. Nowadays, health behaviour studies are considered to be an important method of measuring the health of a population. Objective: To assess the health behaviours and value-based health analysis of people aged 50+ who were hospitalized due to cardiovascular disease, depending on the selected descriptive variables. Materials and methods: The study was conducted between April 2018 and December 2018 among 411 subjects aged 50+ who were hospitalized due to cardiovascular disease at the Independent Public Health Care Unit in Sanok (Podkarpackie voivodship in Poland). The method used in the study was a diagnostic survey. The study used the authors’ survey questionnaire and two standardized tests: Inventory of Health-Related Behaviour (IHB) and List of Health Criteria (LHC). A statistical analysis was carried out in the R program, version 3.5.1. The obtained results were subjected to thorough statistical analysis using the following tests: Student’s t, Mann–Whitney U, ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis, Fisher’s Least Significant Difference (LSD), Pearson, and Spearman. Results: The strongest correlation between health status and health behaviours (according to the IHB questionnaire) was in the area of ‘health practices’, while the lowest correlation was found in the areas of ‘correct eating habits’ and ‘preventive behaviours’. Based on the LHC questionnaire, the most important health criteria according to the subjects were ‘not feeling any physical ailments’; ‘having all body parts functional’; ‘feeling well’; ‘eating properly’; and ‘infrequent need of going to the doctor’. A positive correlation was found in the group of respondents where the ‘preventive health behaviours’ were more intense; herein, the more important criterion for the respondents was ‘eating properly’. Conclusions: Respondents aged 50+ and hospitalized for cardiovascular diseases indicated (based on the IHB questionnaire) that health behaviours in the area of ‘health practices’ had the strongest correlation with their health, while the lowest correlation was found in the areas of ‘correct eating habits’ and ‘preventive behaviours’. According to the respondents, the most important criteria determining health (according to the LHC questionnaire) included ’not feeling any physical ailments’; ‘having all body parts functional’; ‘feeling well’; ‘eating properly’; and ‘infrequent need of going to the doctor’. Based on the information collected from the respondents, it was found that the most important criteria determining health depended on selected descriptive variables, such as age, gender, place of residence, education, and marital status.

1. Introduction

Due to the development of the demographic situation in Poland, the issues of reducing morbidity and mortality due to cardiovascular diseases occupy an important place in scientific publications. Cardiovascular diseases have been the greatest threat to the lives of Poles for over 50 years, although the share of these diseases in the total number of deaths has decreased by over 7% over the last 20 years. Undoubtedly, the observed changes have been influenced primarily by the change in health behaviours, especially eating habits and regular preventive examinations [,,].
However, despite the improvement in the epidemiological situation, in the last two decades the mortality rate due to cardiovascular diseases, especially the mortality rate (in people aged below 60), still has been high in Poland. Given the current disease trends and the pace of ageing of the Polish population, it is estimated that the number of deaths due to cardiovascular diseases in 2022 will exceed 200,000 [,,].
The abovementioned epidemiological data justify the need to conduct research on the health behaviours of people of different ages in terms of assessing their health behaviours, and subsequently to take appropriate steps to eliminate incorrect health behaviours that may lead to, among others, cardiovascular diseases.
Nowadays, health behaviour studies are considered to be an important method of measuring the health of a population [,,,,,]. The choice of specific behaviours depends on the importance of health in one’s system of values [,,,,,]. It should be emphasized, however, that the health status is conditioned by many factors, such as behavioural factors, genetic conditions, and health care [].
Health behaviours are defined as activities aimed at maintaining or regaining health. Health behaviours are a form of a person’s activity aimed at achieving health goals. The aim of the activities undertaken by healthy people is to maintain or increase health resources, while in patients it is to improve their health [,,,]. These behaviours include behaviours aimed at maintaining well-being; behaviours protecting health; behaviours reducing the risk of losing health; activities of those who noticed disease symptoms in themselves—in order to accurately assess their own health condition and take preventive measures; and activities of a person describing themselves as sick—to improve their state of health and to improve their state of health through a treatment process [,,]. Health behaviours are reactions to all health-related situations, as well as habits and deliberate activities. Each person permanently, intentionally, consciously, and independently makes choices about behaviours that have a positive or negative impact on health. An important determinant of the decisions made is life experience and knowledge in the field of health and disease [,,,,,]. Determinants of choosing health behaviours include age, gender, life goals, social situation (education, social roles, origin, material situation, and place of residence), and cultural situation (world view, family and national traditions, and customs) [,,]. Health behaviours that positively influence human health—apart from one’s self-control, responsibility for one’s own health, and a positive attitude—are mainly a healthy diet, regular physical activity, and an adequate amount of sleep per day. Disease risk factors and thus negative health behaviours include smoking, incorrect diet, low or no physical activity, and alcohol abuse [,,,,]. The unsatisfactory health situation of the Polish population, with a tendency to deteriorate in some spheres, requires specific health and preventive measures. The study and analysis of health behaviours create an opportunity to diagnose the areas of ignorance in the field of health care, to determine the risks and harmfulness, as well as to determine the scale of the problem in order to prevent irregularities or pathologies [,].
It should be noted that the contemporary society is ageing [,,,,]. Life expectancy in Poland increases but it remains significantly shorter than the average in the European Union (EU) by approximately 4 years. The development of civilization and an increasing life expectancy have become the main factors that contribute to the unsatisfactory health condition of the society, especially in the 50+ group [,].
The ageing period is characterized by the intensification of physical changes, which are manifested mainly by burdensome ailments and multiple diseases. The biggest threat to life related to incorrect health behaviours are cardiovascular diseases, which are a serious problem in terms of medicine, social life, and economy. Cardiovascular diseases have an epidemiological nature and are therefore referred to as ‘civilization diseases’. They are the most common causes of death in Poland, Europe, and worldwide. They often cause physical and mental disability and require huge financial funding, both in terms of public finances and individual patient spending [,,,,,,].
Hence, strengthening the correct and changing the incorrect actions that condition one’s health has a significant impact on the increased quality of life, despite the unstoppable changes in the physical functioning of the ageing people [,,,]. Assessment of the level and the quality of health behaviours allows for undertaking educational activities, care, and treatment towards the senior population [,,]
However, it should be emphasized that the key to maintaining and improving health is prevention.
Incorrect lifestyle is a factor underlying many chronic diseases. A study by Italian researchers has shown that more than half of the Italian population does not meet the WHO thresholds for at least moderate physical activity. The study assessed the impact on health and healthcare expenditure of seven public health policies aimed at promoting exercise and physical activity against a normal business scenario. The assessed policies included promotion of active transport, interventions at sedentary workplaces, investments in sports and recreation, mass-media campaigns, prescription of physical activity in primary care, school-based interventions, and mobile apps. The researchers concluded that public policies promoting physical activity could improve the health of the population and save healthcare expenditure, which would help avoid hundreds of cases of cardiovascular disease and diabetes per year, and dozens of cancer cases [].
A similar situation in terms of a low level of physical activity can be observed in other countries, e.g., in Poland, Germany, the UK, and Belgium. Hence, appropriate steps should be taken to change the incorrect lifestyle of the society and thus prevent the occurrence of many dangerous chronic diseases in the future []
The aim of this study is to assess the health behaviours and value-based health analysis of people aged 50+ who were hospitalized due to cardiovascular disease, depending on the selected descriptive variables. The main hypothesis is as follows: Among the variables of the Inventory of Health-Related Behaviour (IHB), health practices had the strongest correlation with health, while understanding health, according to the List of Health Criteria (LHC), significantly affected the health behaviours of people aged 50+ who were hospitalized for cardiovascular diseases.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

This publication is another analysis of the results of studies conducted within a research project carried out on the territory of Poland and concerning the quality of life and health behaviours of people aged over 50 years old who were hospitalized due to cardiovascular diseases in Poland.
This study was triggered by the deteriorating health situation of people aged 50+ in Poland in the last two decades. The highest percentage of morbidity and mortality is caused by cardiovascular diseases. The risk factors for cardiovascular diseases include, among others, age, gender, genetic predisposition, as well as incorrect health behaviour, which became a starting point of this study. Standardized questionnaires—the Inventory of Health-Related Behaviour (IHB) and List of Health Criteria (LHC)—were used in the study; they are designed to study the health situation of people of different ages. These tools offer a detailed picture of health behaviours and an analysis of the respondents’ health.

2.2. Studied Population

The study was conducted between April 2018 and December 2018 among 411 subjects aged 50+ who were hospitalized due to cardiovascular disease at the Independent Public Health Care Unit in Sanok (Podkarpackie voivodship in Poland).
The simple random selection method was used, and the study was carried out using 3 survey questionnaires, while the remaining data were obtained from the so-called patients’ ‘health cards’. The research tools allowed the authors to analyse the health situation of the respondents in the last 10 years.
Based on those records, the authors verified the existing cardiovascular diseases and obtained the necessary data for the calculation of indicators such as BMI. The (anonymous) questionnaires, along with patients’ informed consent to participate in the study, were completed by the patients in accordance with the study instructions presented to them earlier.
The criteria for the study group were the following: age—50+; and gender—women and men diagnosed with cardiovascular disease and who were hospitalized due to the diseases in the Independent Public Health Care Unit in Sanok, Podkarpackie voivodship, Poland. The criteria for exclusion from the study group were age under 50, no diagnosed cardiovascular diseases, and gender—not hospitalized men and women.

2.2.1. Description of Research Tools

The method used in the study was a diagnostic survey. The study employed 3 research tools:
  • Authors’ 3-part survey questionnaire. The first part focused on social information; the second part—health of the subjects; and the third part—their lifestyle.
  • The second tool was the standardized questionnaire ‘List of Health Criteria’ (LHC) by Zygmunt Juczyński. LHC contained 24 statements describing the positive elements of three dimensions of health: physical, mental, and social; its results help determine respondents’ preferences in terms of health determinants, discover what the respondents understand by the concept of health, what it means for a given individual to ‘be healthy’, and discover the extent to which health is equated to state, process, or property. The respondents reported their preferences, indicating which of the given statements were important in their health assessment, and which among the selected statements were the most crucial. It resulted in a ranking of all 24 health criteria which characterized the study group. To interpret the results, one needed to consider the distribution of the number of ranks of the individual health criteria. LHC may be useful in activities aimed at modifying health behaviours, as well as in therapy and rehabilitation.
  • The third research tool was the standardized ‘Inventory of Health-Related Behaviour’ (IHB) developed by Zygmunt Juczyński. It consists of 25 statements describing various types of health-related behaviours. It enabled an overall assessment of the intensity of healthy behaviours, as well as 4 categories of health behaviours, namely, correct eating habits, preventive behaviour, positive mental attitude, and health practices. The value of the general indicator of health behaviours ranged from 24 to 120 points. The higher the indicator, the greater the intensity of the declared healthy behaviours. After conversion into standardized units, the indicator was subjected to interpretation as sten scores. Scores 1–4 were considered low, 5–6 average, and 7–10 high. For this scale, normative values for various age and social groups as well as for the healthy and the ill were determined. The author of the questionnaire provided sufficient reliability for the overall score of the IHB (α = 0.85) and for the individual scales (Cronbach’s alpha index ranged from 0.60 to 0.65) [].

2.2.2. Consent of the Bioethical Committee to Conduct the Study

The study was approved by the Bioethics Committee of the Medical University of Lodz, under number RNN/156/18/KE.

2.2.3. Statistical Analysis

A statistical analysis was carried out in the R program, version 3.5.1. (The R Consortium, Vienna, Austria).
The analysis of the quantitative variables (i.e., expressed in numbers) was performed by calculating the mean, standard deviation, median, quartiles, minimum, and maximum values. The analysis of the qualitative variables (i.e., not expressed in numbers) was conducted by calculating the number and percentage of occurrences of each value. ‘0′ means zero points, i.e., a situation in which a given criteria was not selected by the respondent.
The comparison of the values of quantitative variables in two groups was made using Student’s t-test (when the variable had a normal distribution in these groups) or the Mann–Whitney U test (for a non-normal distribution).
A comparison of the values of the quantitative variables in three or more groups was made using ANOVA analysis (when the variable had a normal distribution in these groups) or the Kruskal–Wallis test (for a non-normal distribution). After detecting statistically significant differences, post-hoc analysis was carried out with Fisher’s Least Significant Difference (LSD) test (normal distribution) or Dunn’s test (non-normal distribution) to identify the statistically significant differences between groups.
Correlations between the quantitative variables were analysed using the Pearson correlation coefficient (when both variables had a normal distribution) or Spearman correlation coefficient (otherwise). The strength of the correlation was interpreted according to the following scheme:
|r| ≥ 0.9—very strong correlation
0.7 ≤ |r| < 0.9—strong correlation
0.5 ≤ |r| < 0.7—medium correlation
0.3 ≤ |r| < 0.5—weak correlation
|r| < 0.3—very week correlation (negligible).
Interpretation based on Hinkle D.E., Wiersma W., Jurs S.G. Applied Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences. 5th ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2003 [].
The normality of the variable distribution was tested using the Shapiro–Wilk test. The analysis adopted the significance level of 0.05 (thus, all p values below 0.05 were interpreted as significant correlations) [].

3. Results

The characteristics of the study group are presented in Table 1. The group was dominated by men—there were 223 men (54.26%) and 186 women (45.26%). The age structure of the study group: the average age of the subjects was 69.2 (SD = 9.45 and ranged from 50 to 93); the median was 69.
Table 1. Characteristics of the respondents.
Body weight of the subject group: 157 subjects (38.20%) were overweight and 125 (30.41%) suffered from class 1 obesity.
Place of residence of the study group: the most numerous group was the inhabitants of cities below 100,000—223 people (54.26%)—while there were 183 people in rural areas (44.53%).
Education of study group: the proportion of people with vocational education was the highest—191 people (46.47%)—while 145 people (35.28%) reported secondary education.
In the study group, the majority, i.e., 313 people (76.16%), were professionally inactive, while 84 people (20.44%) were still active.
The structure of marital status: the largest group were married people—311 subjects (75.67%)—followed by widows and widowers—73 individuals (17.76%).
Analysing the incidence of cardiovascular diseases amongst subjects, it was found that 262 people (63.75%) had coronary heart disease, which was followed by atherosclerosis, 240 people (58.39%), and hypertension, 162 people (39.42%) (Table 1).
Analysis of the health behaviour results according to the Inventory of Health-Related Behaviour (IHB) and the analysis of health assessment criteria according to the List of Health Criteria (LHC) showed that people aged 50+ who were hospitalized due to cardiovascular diseases indicated the following as the important health criteria:
  • not feeling any physical ailments;
  • having all body parts functional;
  • feeling well;
  • eating properly;
  • infrequent need of going to the doctor (Table 2).
Table 2. List of Health Criteria of the studied group.
As a result of the comparison of the most important statements regarding health, taking into account the age of the respondents, it was found that age significantly and positively correlated with the following criteria (p < 0.05):
  • drinking little or no alcohol;
  • not getting sick, at most with flu, indigestion (rarely);
  • having healthy eyes, hair, and skin.
It should be noted that the abovementioned health criteria were more important for the elderly respondents.
On the other hand, age correlated significantly and negatively with the following criterion (p < 0.05):
  • ability to work without tension and stress.
For elderly patients, this criterion was less important than for the rest of the study group (Table 3).
Table 3. Correlations of health statements with the age of the respondents.
After analysing the most important statements in the respondents’ opinion, it was found that the perception of 9 out of 24 health criteria significantly depended on gender (p < 0.05).
The studied group of women perceived the following health criteria as more important than men:
  • feeling happy most of the time;
  • eating properly;
  • drinking little or no alcohol;
  • not smoking tobacco;
  • ability to work without tension and stress.
Less important criteria for the studied group of women were:
  • not feeling any physical ailments;
  • not getting sick, at most with flu, indigestion (rarely);
  • having all body parts functional;
  • infrequent need of going to the doctor (Table 4).
Table 4. Correlations of health statements with the gender of the respondents.
After analysing the study results, it was found that the perception of 3 out of 24 health criteria significantly depended on BMI (p < 0.05). A post-hoc analysis was performed, which helped discover significant relationships. The analysis showed that:
  • obese people perceived the criterion ‘eating properly’ as less important than other respondents and obese people perceived the criterion ‘having all body parts functional’ as more important than those with underweight and regular body weight. (Table 5).
Table 5. Correlations of health statements with the BMI of the respondents.
After analysing the study results, it was found that the perception of 9 out of 24 health criteria significantly depended on place of residence (p < 0.05).
The respondents who lived in cities perceived the following criteria as more important than those living in a rural environment:
  • eating properly and adequate amount of rest, sleep.
On the other hand, the respondents who lived in cities perceived the following criteria as less important: drinking little or no alcohol and not getting sick, at most with flu, indigestion (rarely) (Table 6).
Table 6. Correlations of health statements with the place of residence of the respondents.
The statistical analysis showed that the perception of 16 out of 24 health criteria significantly depended on education (p < 0.05). A post-hoc analysis was performed, which helped discover that people with vocational and secondary education perceived the criterion ‘getting along well with other people’ as less important than people with primary and higher education and people with higher education perceived the criteria of ‘knowing how to solve one’s problems’, ‘ability to work without tension and stress’, ‘ability to adapt to life changes’, ‘ability to control one’s own feelings and desires’, ‘accepting oneself, knowing one’s possibilities and limitations’, and ‘having a job, various interests’ as more important than other respondents. (Table 7).
Table 7. Correlations of health statements with the education of the respondents.
After analysing the study results, it was found that the perception of 3 out of 24 health criteria significantly depended on the professional activity (p < 0.05).
The respondents who were professionally active perceived the following criterion as more important than inactive ones: ability to work without tension and stress.
Meanwhile, the criteria perceived by the professionally active respondents as less important were:
  • getting along well with other people;
  • not getting sick, at most with flu, indigestion (rarely) (Table 8).
Table 8. Correlations of health statements with the professional activity of the respondents.
The analysis of the comparison of health statements with the marital status of the respondents showed that the perception of 12 out of 24 health criteria significantly depended on marital status (p < 0.05).
Married respondents perceived the following criteria as more important than other respondents: eating properly; adequate amount of rest, sleep; and not smoking tobacco. (Table 9).
Table 9. Correlations of health statements with the marital status of the respondents.
The analysis of the study results based on the IHB questionnaire showed that the most common health behaviours were related to ‘health practices’, slightly less common in the area of ‘positive mental attitude’, and the least common in the area of ‘proper eating habits’ and ‘preventive behaviours’ (Table 10).
Table 10. Degree of intensity of specific categories of health behaviours according to the Inventory of Health-Related Behaviour (IHB) amongst respondents.
By correlating the level of health behaviours according to the IHB with individual categories from the LHC, a total of 59 statistically significant relationships were observed (p < 0.05). A list of these dependencies, sorted from the strongest to the weakest, is presented in the table below (Table 11).
Table 11. The level of health behaviours according to the Inventory of Health-Related Behaviour (IHB) versus number of selections of individual categories of the List of Health Criteria (LHC).

4. Discussion and Limitations

The results of the conducted study painted the picture of the health behaviours and health analysis of people aged 50+ who were hospitalized for cardiovascular diseases, depending on the selected descriptive variables.
The study (according to the LHC) showed that the following factors were of great importance in the selection of appropriate criteria determining the health of the respondents: gender, age, education, place of residence, and marital status.
The conducted study has shown that, for the older respondents, the most important factor determining their health is the avoidance of stimulants, while the examined group of women considered the following health criteria as more important than the studied group of men: feeling of happiness and proper nutrition. The respondents from the cities indicated that important criteria for health were proper nutrition, sleep, and rest—more often than their rural counterparts. The education of the respondents had a significant impact on the results obtained: people with higher education chose solving difficult life situations and working without stress as the most important criteria of health. The marital status of the respondents also turned out to be extremely important in choosing the criteria determining health: married respondents considered proper nutrition, as well as sleep and rest as the most important criteria of health.
The study (based on the IHB) has shown that the respondents rated the highest health practices related to proper daily health habits, such as sleep, rest, and regular meals.
Based on the obtained results, the authors initiated a discussion with other authors conducting studies with the same research tools, which helped make a precise summary.
‘Having all body parts functional’ was the most important criterion for people aged 50+ in the study conducted by Nowicki and Ślusarska []. It was followed by ‘reaching very old age’. The authors’ own study showed that health was understood by the respondents as property and state, similarly to the study by Bąk-Sosnowska et al. []. In the study by G. Nowicki and B. Ślusarska, the respondents gave the greatest importance to health as a property and as an objective []. The study by Cybulski et al. also showed that the elderly attached the highest importance to health understood as property, then as an objective, state, process, and a result []. Each of the studied groups understood health primary as a property. According to Juczyński, this is an instrumental approach []. This fact should not come as a surprise, as the respondents were a sick and hospitalized group, for whom the disease was often an unpleasant experience and a source of stress [,,,,].
The analysis of the study results based on the Inventory of Health-Related Behaviour (IHB) showed that amongst subjects the most common health behaviours were related to ‘health practices’, slightly less common in the area of ‘positive mental attitude’ and the least common in the area of ‘proper eating habits’ and ‘preventive behaviours’. Similar observations were made in the studies by Nowicki et al. and Cybulski et al. [,]. However, somewhat different results were obtained in studies of elderly people by Prakash et al. and Zanjani et al. There, health behaviours in the area of ‘correct eating habits’ were the most intense [,].
When correlating the level of health behaviours according to the IHB with individual categories of the LHC, a total of 59 statistically significant relationships were observed. A positive correlation was found in the group of respondents where the ‘preventive health behaviours’ were more intense; from these, the more important criterion for the respondents was ‘eating properly’. Negative relationships were also found for the respondents for whom ‘correct eating habits’ were important; here, respondents placed more importance on ‘infrequent need of going to the doctor’s’.
The obtained results of the authors’ own study, carried out with the use of the LHC, differed slightly from the results of other cited authors [,,,,,,,,]. According to our respondents aged 50+, ‘being health’ meant above all ‘not feeling any physical ailments’; ‘having all body parts functional’; ‘feeling well’; ‘eating properly’; and ‘infrequent need of going to the doctor’. The differences between the evaluation of health by the elderly presented in the available literature may result from the socio-cultural differences of individual regions of Poland, personal beliefs, general economy, politics, and organization of the society structure [,,,,,]. Cultural determinants—the system of norms and beliefs, patterns of behaviour, as well as all material and non-material products generated by a given social group—play an important role in shaping and choosing healthy behaviours. The determinant of social position is education, which reflects the level of knowledge, including medical knowledge. There was a clear relationship between social status and choice of health behaviours. The higher the education, the higher the requirements for the healthcare, compared to people with lower education [,]. Lifestyle plays a fundamental role in maintaining health and prevention of diseases, also in the elderly. Lifestyle elements that have beneficial health effects include correct diet and eating habits, optimal level of physical activity, adequate amount of sleep, satisfactory social relations, skilful use of free time, and knowledge of health prevention [,,,,,,].
A properly balanced diet is particularly important for maintaining health. Based on the conducted study, the principles of proper nutrition were not perceived by the respondents as a significant factor for preventing or combating already existing cardiovascular diseases. Irrespectively, dietary risk is the most important behavioural health factor in the world, and appears to be the best target in the fight against cardiovascular disease. In the research by Raver A. et al., it has been proven that a proper diet, especially the Mediterranean diet, brings effective results in reducing cardiovascular risk worldwide [].
However, an incorrect diet and low physical activity are linked to overweight and obesity, which contribute to the occurrence of cardiovascular diseases. Obesity was found in 34.87% of the respondents. Seravalle G. et al. found that obesity, and especially the excessive distribution of visceral fat, was accompanied by several changes at the hormonal, inflammatory, and endothelial levels. These changes induce the stimulation of several other mechanisms that contribute to hypertension and increase cardiovascular morbidity [].
Given the above, the evidence clearly shows the importance of lifestyle factors (e.g., diet, exercise, and drug use) in the development of cardiovascular disease. Interventions targeted at these behaviours can greatly improve results, and therefore the health and well-being of patients with cardiovascular disease [].
Summarizing the conducted study, it may be stated that it is important to try and promote health in the hierarchy of values of people aged 50+ and to strengthen their responsibility for their own health and life. Broadly understood education should help raise public health awareness.
As a result of the conducted study, it was found that the most important criteria (according to LHC) that determine health according to the respondents were proper nutrition, adequate sleep, rest, work without stress and tension, and the ability to solve difficult life situations. A particularly high score was given to one of four areas of health behaviours in IHB, namely, ‘health practices’. It proved that the respondents had proper daily health habits, which is very valuable and may determine good health in the future.
The use of standardized questionnaires in further research will allow for a wider observation of health behaviours in people of different ages. Additionally, increasing the number of subjects would help further determine health behaviours, as well as assess the health criteria that the subjects considered as crucial. After more extensive research in the group of people aged 50+ with cardiovascular diseases, more constructive conclusions might be drawn, which would allow specific preventive measures to be taken from the earliest years in order to prevent cardiovascular diseases.

5. Conclusions

Respondents aged 50+ and hospitalized for cardiovascular diseases indicated (based on IHB questionnaire) that health behaviours in the area of ‘health practices’ had the strongest correlation with their health, while the lowest correlation was found in the areas of ‘correct eating habits’ and ‘preventive behaviours’. According to the respondents, the most important criteria determining health (according to the LHC Questionnaire) included ’not feeling any physical ailments’; ‘having all body parts functional’; ‘feeling well’; ‘eating properly’; and ‘infrequent need of going to the doctor’.
Based on the information collected from the respondents, it was found that the most important criteria determining health depended on selected descriptive variables, such as age—it was found that for older respondents, avoidance of stimulants is one of the most important factors determining health; gender—the majority of the studied group of women perceived health in many aspects, including feeling happy and wellbeing; place of residence—respondents from urban environment put emphasis on the role of healthy eating in maintaining good health, as opposed to their counterparts from a rural environment; education—respondents with education higher education paid attention to many factors determining health, as opposed to respondents with lower education, e.g., solving life problems and work without stress; and lastly, marital status—married respondents attached great importance to the principles of proper nutrition in order to maintain health compared to the group of respondents who are not married.
Practical implications: Due to the differences in respondents’ preferences in terms of health behaviours, as well as their approach to their health that depended on gender, age, education, and place of residence, it is particularly important to take measures aimed at providing health education to society, which can effectively overcome the problem of anti-health behaviours, existing health imbalance, and help fight cardiovascular disease.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.G. and K.S.; methodology, E.C. and M.S. (Marian Sygit); software, A.P. and M.S. (Maryna Surmach); validation, D.K. and A.R.; formal analysis, I.G. and K.S.; investigation, M.S. (Marian Sygit) and A.P.; resources, M.S. (Maryna Surmach). and A.R.; data curation, D.K. and A.R.; writing—original draft preparation, I.G. and E.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of Medical University in Lodz Poland (protocol code: RNN/156/18/KE).

Data Availability Statement

Data are not publicly available and data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kino, S.; Bernabé, E.; Sabbah, W. Socioeconomic inequality in clusters of health-related behaviours in Europe: Latent class analysis of a cross-sectional European survey. BMC Public Health 2017, 17, 451–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wojtyniak, B.; Goryński, P.; Moskalewicz, B. (Eds.) The Health Situation of the Polish Population and Its Determinants; The National Institute of Public Health-National Institute of Hygiene: Warsaw, Poland, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  3. Younus, A.; Aneni, E.C.; Spatz, E.S.; Osondu, C.U.; Roberson, L.; Ogunmoroti, O.; Malik, R.; Ali, S.S.; Aziz, M.; Feldman, T.; et al. A systematic review of the prevalence and outcomes of ideal cardiovascular health in US and Non-US populations. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2016, 91, 649–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Moor, I.; Spallek, J.; Richter, M. Explaining socioeconomic inequalities in self-rated health: A systematic review of the relative contribution of material, psychosocial and behavioural factors. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2017, 71, 565–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Maclagan, L.C.; Park, J.; Sanmartin, C.; Mathur, K.R.; Roth, D.; Manuel, U.G.; Gershon, A.; Booth, G.L.; Bhatia, S.; Atzema, C.L.; et al. The CANHEART health index: A tool for monitoring the cardiovascular health of the Canadian population. CMAJ 2013, 186, 180–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Jankovic, S.; Stojisavljević, D.; Janković, J.; Eric, M.; Marinkovic, J. Status of cardiovascular health in a transition European country: Findings from a population-based cross-sectional study. Int. J. Public Health 2014, 59, 769–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Zatoński, W. One hundred years of health in Poland. J. Health Inequal. 2019, 5, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nowicki, G.J.; Ślusarska, B.; Piasecka, H.; Bartoszek, A.; Kocka, K.; Deluga, A. The Status of Cardiovascular Health in Rural and Urban Areas of Janów Lubelski District in Eastern Poland: A Population-Based Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 2388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cabellos-García, A.C.; Castro-Sánchez, E.; Martínez-Sabater, A.; Díaz-Herrera, M.Á.; Ocaña-Ortiz, A.; Juárez-Vela, R.; Gea-Caballero, V. Relationship between Determinants of Health, Equity, and Dimensions of Health Literacy in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Stefler, D.; Pikhart, H.; Jankovic, N.; Kubinova, R.; Pajak, A.; Malyutina, S.; Simonova, G.; Feskens, E.J.M.; Peasey, A.; Bobak, M. Healthy diet indicator and mortality in Eastern European populations: Prospective evidence from the HAPIEE cohort. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2014, 68, 1346–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. D’Addario, M.; Cappelletti, E.R.; Sarini, M.; Greco, A.; Steca, P. The TTCYB Study Protocol: A Tailored Print Message Intervention to Improve Cardiovascular Patients’ Lifestyles. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Fernández, D.; Brotons, C.; Moral, I.; Bulc, M.; Afonso, M.; Akan, H.; Pinto, S.; Vucak, J.; Martins, C.M.D.S. Lifestyle behaviours in patients with established cardiovascular diseases: A European observational study. BMC Fam. Pract. 2019, 20, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Strzelecki, Z.; Szymborski, J. Morbidity and Mortality of Cardiovascular Diseases and the Demographic Situation of Poland Government Population Council. Available online: https://bip.stat.gov.pl/files/gfx/bip/pl/zamowieniapubliczne/426/248/1/81_gp_rrl_2015_monografia_kardiologiczna.pdf (accessed on 19 December 2020).
  14. Cybulski, M.; Krajewska-Kulak, E.; Jamiolkowski, J. Preferred health behaviors and quality of life of the elderly people in Poland. Clin. Interv. Aging 2015, 10, 1555–1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  15. Deluga, A.; Kosicka, B.; Dobrowolska, B.; Chrzan-Rodak, A.; Jurek, K.; Wrońska, I.; Ksykiewicz-Dorota, A.; Jedrych, M.; Drop, B. Lifestyle of the elderly living in rural and urban areas measured by the FANTASTIC Life Inventory. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2018, 25, 562–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nyberg, S.T.; Singh-Manoux, A.; Pentti, J.; Madsen, I.E.H.; Sabia, S.; Alfredsson, L.; Bjorner, J.B.; Borritz, M.; Burr, H.; Goldberg, M.; et al. Association of Healthy Lifestyle With Years Lived without Major Chronic Diseases. JAMA Intern. Med. 2020, 180, 760–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Tang, K.L.; Rashid, R.; Godley, J.; A Ghali, W. Association between subjective social status and cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular risk factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2016, 6, e010137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Havranek, E.P.; Mujahid, M.S.; Barr, D.A.; Blair, I.V.; Cohen, M.S.; Cruz-Flores, S.; Davey-Smith, G.; Dennison-Himmelfarb, C.R.; Lauer, M.S.; Lockwood, D.W.; et al. Social determinants of risk and outcomes for cardiovascular disease. A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2015, 132, 873–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. De La Cruz, N.; Shabaneh, O.; Appiah, D. The Association of Ideal Cardiovascular Health and Ocular Diseases Among US Adults. Am. J. Med. 2021, 134, 252–259.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Townsend, N.; Wilson, L.; Bhatnagar, P.; Wickramasinghe, K.; Rayner, M.; Nichols, M. Cardiovascular disease in Europe: Epidemiological update 2016. Eur. Hear. J. 2016, 37, 3232–3245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Benjamin, E.J.; Blaha, M.J.; Chiuve, S.E.; Cushman, M.; Das, S.R.; de Ferranti, S.D.; Floyd, J.; Fornage, M.; Gillespie, C.; Isasi, C.R.; et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2017 Update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2017, 135, e146–e603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Folsom, A.R.; Yatsuya, H.; Nettleton, J.A.; Lutsey, P.L.; Cushman, M.; Rosamond, W.D. ARIC Study Investigators Community prevalence of ideal cardiovascular health, by the American Heart Association definition, and relation to cardiovascular disease incidence. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2011, 57, 1690–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Prakash, S.J.; Bihari, G.S.; Kumar, S.A. Lifestyle habits and diseases amongst rural geriatrics population. Int. J. Community Med. Public Health 2016, 3, 957–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  24. Zanjani, S.; Tol, A.; Mohebbi, B.; Sadeghi, R.; Jalyani, K.N.; Moradi, A. Determinants of healthy lifestyle and its related factors among elderly people. J. Educ. Health Promot. 2015, 4, 103–115. [Google Scholar]
  25. He, Z.; Cheng, Z.; Shao, T.; Liu, C.; Shao, P.; Bishwajit, G.; Feng, D.; Feng, Z. Factors influencing health knowledge and behaviors among the elderly in rural China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Selivanova, A.; Cramm, J.M. The relationship between healthy behaviors and health outcomes among older adults in Russia. BMC Public Health 2014, 14, 1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Goryakin, Y.; Aldea, A.; Lerouge, A.; Spica, V.R.; Nante, N.; Vuik, S.; Devaux, M.; Cecchini, M. Promoting sport and physical activity in Italy: A cost-effectiveness analysis of seven innovative public health policies. Ann. Ig. 2019, 31, 614–625. [Google Scholar]
  28. Biernat, E.; Piątkowska, M. Recreational Physical Activity of Poles in Europe. Report for the Department of Sports Analysis and Policy of the Ministry of Sport and Tourism. Warsaw, Poland. Available online: https://www.msit.gov.pl/ (accessed on 12 December 2020).
  29. Juczyński, Z. Narzędzia Pomiaru w Promocji I Psychologii Zdrowia [Tools for Health Promotion and Psychology of Health], 2nd ed.; Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych: Warszawa, Poland, 2009; pp. 110–116. [Google Scholar]
  30. Witz, K.; Hinkle, D.E.; Wiersma, W.; Jurs, S.G. Applied Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. J. Educ. Stat. 1990, 15, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2018; Available online: https://www.R-project.org (accessed on 6 November 2020).
  32. Bąk-Sosnowska, M.; Skrzypulec-Plinta, V. Health behaviors, health definitions, sense of coherence, and general practitioners’ attitudes towards obesity and diagnosing obesity in patients. Arch. Med Sci. 2017, 13, 433–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Stehr, P.; Weber, W.; Rossmann, C. Health information behavior of 65+: Reaching older target groups. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundh. Gesundh. 2021, 64, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Benziger, C.P.; Zavala-Loayza, J.A.; Bernabe-Ortiz, A.; Gilman, R.H.; Checkley, W.; Smeeth, L.; Malaga, G.; Miranda, J.J. Low prevalence of ideal cardiovascular health in Peru. Heart 2018, 104, 1251–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Vandenheede, H.; Vikhireva, O.; Pikhart, H.; Kubinova, R.; Malyutina, S.; Pajak, A.; Tamosiunas, A.; Peasey, A.; Simonova, G.; Topor-Madry, R.; et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in all-cause mortality in the Czech Republic, Russia, Poland and Lithuania in the 2000s: Findings from the HAPIEE Study. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2013, 68, 297–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Piepoli, M.F.; Hoes, A.W.; Agewall, S.; Albus, C.; Brotons, C.; Catapano, A.L.; Cooney, M.T.; Corrà, U.; Cosyns, B.; Deaton, C.; et al. 2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: The Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts): Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention& Rehabilitation (EACPR). Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2016, 23, NP1–NP96. [Google Scholar]
  37. Doryńska, A.; Polak, M.; Kozel, M.; Szafraniec, K.; Piotrowski, W.; Bielecki, W.; Drygas, W.; Kozakiewicz, K.; Piwoński, J.; Tykarski, A.; et al. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors in Krakow and in the whole Poland adult population. Results from the WOBASZ study and Polish arm of the HAPPIE project. Przegl. Epidemiol. 2015, 69, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  38. Unger, E.; Diez-Roux, A.V.; Lloyd-Jones, D.M.; Mujahid, M.S.; Nettleton, J.A.; Bertoni, A.; Badon, S.E.; Ning, H.; Allen, N.B. Association of Neighborhood Characteristics With Cardiovascular Health in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes 2014, 7, 524–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lloyd-Jones, D.M.; Hong, Y.; Labarthe, D.; Mozaffarian, D.; Appel, L.J.; Van Horn, L.; Greenlund, K.; Daniels, S.; Nichol, G.; Tomaselli, G.F.; et al. American heart association strategic planning task force and statistics committee defining and setting national goals for cardiovascular health promotion and disease reduction: The American heart association’s strategic impact goal through 2020 and beyond. Circulation 2010, 121, 586–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Roger, V.L.; Go, A.S.; Lloyd-Jones, D.M.; Benjamin, E.J.; Berry, J.D.; Borden, W.B.; Bravata, D.M.; Dai, S.; Ford, E.S.; Fox, C.S.; et al. Executive summary: Heart disease and stroke statistics-2012 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2012, 34, 125–188. [Google Scholar]
  41. Rywik, S.; Kupść, W.; Piotrowski, W.; Broda, G.; Piwoński, J.; Kurjata, P.; Waśkiewicz, A.; Gaździk, D. A multicenter na-tionwide study of the Polish population’s health—WOBASZ project. Methodical assumptions and logistics. Kardiol. Pol. 2005, 63 (Suppl. S4), 605–613. [Google Scholar]
  42. Manczuk, M.; Vaidean, G.; Dehghan, M.; Vedanthan, R.; Boffetta, P.; Zatonski, W.A. Ideal cardiovascular health is associated with self-rated health status. The Polish Norwegian Study (PONS). Int. J. Cardiol. 2017, 230, 549–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Jaźwiec, P.; Gać, P.; Poręba, M.; Sobieszczańska, M.; Mazur, G.; Poręba, R. The cardiovascular health score and the volume of carotid body in computed tomography angiography in patients with arterial hypertension. J. Am. Soc. Hypertens. 2018, 12, 551–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Samet, J. The environment and health inequalities: Problems and solutions. J. Health Inequal. 2019, 5, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Janković, S.; Stojisavljević, D.; Erić, M.; Marinković, J. Association of socioeconomic status measured by education, and cardiovascular health: A population-based cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2014, 4, e005222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tam, H.L.; Wong, E.M.L.; Cheung, K. Effectiveness of Educational Interventions on Adherence to Lifestyle Modifications Among Hypertensive Patients: An Integrative Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kim, J.I.; Sillah, A.; Boucher, J.L.; Sidebottom, A.C.; Knickelbine, T. Prevalence of the American Heart Association’s “Ideal Cardiovascular Health” Metrics in a Rural, Cross-sectional, Community-Based Study: The Heart of New Ulm Project. J. Am. Hear. Assoc. 2013, 2, e000058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Moghaddam, M.M.; Mohebi, R.; Hosseini, F.; Lotfaliany, M.; Azizi, F.; Saadat, N.; Hadaegh, F. Distribution of ideal cardiovascular health in a community-based cohort of Middle East population. Ann. Saudi Med. 2014, 34, 134–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ravera, A.; Carubelli, V.; Sciatti, E.; Bonadei, I.; Gorga, E.; Cani, D.; Vizzardi, E.; Metra, M.; Lombardi, C. Nutrition and Cardiovascular Disease: Finding the Perfect Recipe for Cardiovascular Health. Nutrients 2016, 8, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Seravalle, G.; Grassi, G. Obesity and hypertension. Pharmacol. Res. 2017, 122, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Doughty, K.N.; Del Pilar, N.X.; Audette, A.; Katz, D.L. Lifestyle Medicine and the Management of Cardiovascular Disease. Curr. Cardiol. Rep. 2017, 19, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Journal Statistics
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.
Download PDF
Massive Edema of the Lower Limbs in Patients after Spinal Cord Injury—One Picture, Different Diagnoses
Previous
Evaluation of the B.strong Queensland Indigenous Health Worker Brief Intervention Training Program for Multiple Health Risk Behaviours
Next