Next Article in Journal
How to Provide Sexual Education: Lessons from a Pandemic on Masculinity, Individualism, and the Neoliberal Agenda
Next Article in Special Issue
The Impact of Intolerance of Uncertainty on Negative Emotions in COVID-19: Mediation by Pandemic-Focused Time and Moderation by Perceived Efficacy
Previous Article in Journal
Allergies, Allergic Comorbidities and the Home Environment in Pediatric Asthma in Southern Florida
Previous Article in Special Issue
“At Least until the Second Wave Comes…”: A Twitter Analysis of the NHS and COVID-19 between March and June 2020
ijerph-logo
Article Menu

Article Menu

Article

Patterns of Psychological Responses among the Public during the Early Phase of COVID-19: A Cross-Regional Analysis

1
The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
2
Department of Health Sciences, European University Cyprus, 1516 Nicosia, Cyprus
3
Psychological Laboratory, Faculty of Public Health and Social Welfare, Riga Stradiņš University, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia
4
Kore University Behavioral Lab (KUBeLab), Faculty of Human and Social Sciences, Kore University of Enna, 94100 Enna, Italy
5
Department of Social Sciences, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Nicosia, 2417 Nicosia, Cyprus
6
Department of Nursing, Cyprus University of Technology, 3036 Limassol, Cyprus
7
Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics, 1683 Nicosia, Cyprus
8
Department of Psychological Counseling and Guidance, Faculty of Education, Hasan Kalyoncu University, Gaziantep 27010, Turkey
9
Department of Psychology, Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz, Bogotà 110231, Colombia
10
Faculty of Psychology, University of La Sabana, Chía 53753, Colombia
11
School of Applied Psychology, University College Cork, T12 YN60 Cork, Ireland
12
School of Psychology, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland
13
Department of Medical Psychology, Innsbruck Medical University, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
14
Department of Psychology, Babeş-Bolyai University (UBB), 400095 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
15
ISPA—Instituto Universitário, APPsyCI—Applied Psychology Research Center Capabilities & Inclusion, 1149-041 Lisbon, Portugal
16
Faculdade de Psicologia, Alameda da Universidade, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-013 Lisbon, Portugal
17
LIP/PC2S Lab, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, 38040 Grenoble, France
18
Department of Biomedicine, Biotechnology and Public Health, University of Cadiz, 11003 Cadiz, Spain
19
Instituto ACT, 28036 Madrid, Spain
20
Department of Psychology, European University of Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain
21
Department of Psychology and Sociology, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
22
Heim Pal National Pediatric Institute, Department of Mental Health, 1089 Budapest, Hungary
23
Bartosz Kleszcz Psychotherapy and Training, ul. Aleja Zwycięstwa 31/8, 41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland
24
Department of Psychology, University of Jyväskylä, FI-40014 Jyväskylä, Finland
25
Clinic for Psychiatry, Clinical Center of Montenegro, 81110 Podgorica, Montenegro
26
Department of Child, Adolescent and Developmental Neurology, University Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
27
Département de Psychologie, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC G9A 5H7, Canada
28
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
29
Division of Clinical Psychology and Intervention Science, University of Basel, 4001 Basel, Switzerland
30
Department of Psychology, University of Cyprus, 1678 Nicosia, Cyprus
31
Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Andrea Fiorillo and Maurizio Pompili
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(8), 4143; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18084143
Received: 23 March 2021 / Revised: 5 April 2021 / Accepted: 8 April 2021 / Published: 14 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mental Health in the Time of COVID-19)
This study aimed to compare the mediation of psychological flexibility, prosociality and coping in the impacts of illness perceptions toward COVID-19 on mental health among seven regions. Convenience sampled online survey was conducted between April and June 2020 from 9130 citizens in 21 countries. Illness perceptions toward COVID-19, psychological flexibility, prosociality, coping and mental health, socio-demographics, lockdown-related variables and COVID-19 status were assessed. Results showed that psychological flexibility was the only significant mediator in the relationship between illness perceptions toward COVID-19 and mental health across all regions (all ps = 0.001–0.021). Seeking social support was the significant mediator across subgroups (all ps range = <0.001–0.005) except from the Hong Kong sample (p = 0.06) and the North and South American sample (p = 0.53). No mediation was found for problem-solving (except from the Northern European sample, p = 0.009). Prosociality was the significant mediator in the Hong Kong sample (p = 0.016) and the Eastern European sample (p = 0.008). These findings indicate that fostering psychological flexibility may help to mitigate the adverse mental impacts of COVID-19 across regions. Roles of seeking social support, problem-solving and prosociality vary across regions. View Full-Text
Keywords: COVID-19; psychological flexibility; mental health; prosociality; survey COVID-19; psychological flexibility; mental health; prosociality; survey
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Chong, Y.Y.; Chien, W.T.; Cheng, H.Y.; Lamnisos, D.; Ļubenko, J.; Presti, G.; Squatrito, V.; Constantinou, M.; Nicolaou, C.; Papacostas, S.; Aydin, G.; Ruiz, F.J.; Garcia-Martin, M.B.; Obando-Posada, D.P.; Segura-Vargas, M.A.; Vasiliou, V.S.; McHugh, L.; Höfer, S.; Baban, A.; Neto, D.D.; Silva, A.N.d.; Monestès, J.-L.; Alvarez-Galvez, J.; Blarrina, M.P.; Montesinos, F.; Salas, S.V.; Őri, D.; Kleszcz, B.; Lappalainen, R.; Ivanović, I.; Gosar, D.; Dionne, F.; Merwin, R.M.; Gloster, A.T.; Karekla, M.; Kassianos, A.P. Patterns of Psychological Responses among the Public during the Early Phase of COVID-19: A Cross-Regional Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 4143. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18084143

AMA Style

Chong YY, Chien WT, Cheng HY, Lamnisos D, Ļubenko J, Presti G, Squatrito V, Constantinou M, Nicolaou C, Papacostas S, Aydin G, Ruiz FJ, Garcia-Martin MB, Obando-Posada DP, Segura-Vargas MA, Vasiliou VS, McHugh L, Höfer S, Baban A, Neto DD, Silva ANd, Monestès J-L, Alvarez-Galvez J, Blarrina MP, Montesinos F, Salas SV, Őri D, Kleszcz B, Lappalainen R, Ivanović I, Gosar D, Dionne F, Merwin RM, Gloster AT, Karekla M, Kassianos AP. Patterns of Psychological Responses among the Public during the Early Phase of COVID-19: A Cross-Regional Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(8):4143. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18084143

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chong, Yuen Y., Wai T. Chien, Ho Y. Cheng, Demetris Lamnisos, Jeļena Ļubenko, Giovambattista Presti, Valeria Squatrito, Marios Constantinou, Christiana Nicolaou, Savvas Papacostas, Gökçen Aydin, Francisco J. Ruiz, Maria B. Garcia-Martin, Diana P. Obando-Posada, Miguel A. Segura-Vargas, Vasilis S. Vasiliou, Louise McHugh, Stefan Höfer, Adriana Baban, David D. Neto, Ana N.d. Silva, Jean-Louis Monestès, Javier Alvarez-Galvez, Marisa P. Blarrina, Francisco Montesinos, Sonsoles V. Salas, Dorottya Őri, Bartosz Kleszcz, Raimo Lappalainen, Iva Ivanović, David Gosar, Frederick Dionne, Rhonda M. Merwin, Andrew T. Gloster, Maria Karekla, and Angelos P. Kassianos 2021. "Patterns of Psychological Responses among the Public during the Early Phase of COVID-19: A Cross-Regional Analysis" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 8: 4143. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18084143

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop