Next Article in Journal
Food Security, Dietary Intake, and Foodways of Urban Low-Income Older South African Women: An Exploratory Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Preliminary Study of ADHD Biomarkers in Adults with Focus on Serum Iron and Transcranial Sonography of the Substantia Nigra
Previous Article in Journal
Profiles of Loneliness and Social Isolation in Physically Active and Inactive Older Adults in Rural England
Previous Article in Special Issue
Psychiatric Comorbidity in Mexican Adolescents with a Diagnosis of Eating Disorders Its Relationship with the Body Mass Index
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 18
Issue 8
10.3390/ijerph18083972
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Callous–Unemotional Traits among Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder, Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, or Typical Development: Differences between Adolescents’ and Parents’ Views

by
Chen-Lin Chang
1,2,
Tai-Ling Liu
2,3,
Ray C. Hsiao
4,5,
Pinchen Yang
2,3,
Yi-Lung Chen
6,7,* and
Cheng-Fang Yen
2,3,*
1
Department of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Armed Forces General Hospital, Kaohsiung 80284, Taiwan
2
School of Medicine, and Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
3
Department of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
4
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195-6560, USA
5
Department of Psychiatry, Children’s Hospital and Regional Medical Center, Seattle, WA 98105, USA
6
Department of Healthcare Administration, Asia University, Taichung 41354, Taiwan
7
Department of Psychology, Asia University, Taichung 41354, Taiwan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(8), 3972; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18083972
Submission received: 11 February 2021 / Revised: 18 March 2021 / Accepted: 6 April 2021 / Published: 9 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mental Health Issues from Child to Adult)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study examined parent–adolescent agreement on the callous, uncaring, and unemotional dimensions of callous–unemotional (CU) traits and the differences in adolescent-reported and parent-reported CU traits among 126 adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), 207 adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and 203 typically developing (TD) adolescents. Adolescent-reported and parent-reported CU traits on the three dimensions of the Inventory of Callous and Unemotional Traits were obtained. The strength of CU traits and the differences between adolescent-reported and parent-reported traits were compared among the three groups using analysis of covariance. Parent–adolescent agreement was examined using intraclass correlation. The results reveal that both adolescent-reported and parent-reported callousness and uncaring traits in the ASD and ADHD groups were significantly stronger than those in the TD group. Parent–adolescent agreement on the uncaring trait was fair across the three groups, whereas that on callousness was poor across all three groups. Parent–adolescent agreement on unemotionality was fair in the TD group but poor in the ADHD and ASD groups. ASD and ADHD groups had significantly greater differences in scores reported by parents and adolescents on the callousness trait than the TD group. The parent–adolescent score differences in the uncaring trait were also larger in the ASD group than in the TD group. Thus, these results support the application of a multi-informant approach in CU trait assessment, especially for adolescents with ASD or ADHD.

1. Introduction

1.1. Roles of Callous–Unemotional Traits in Health and Behavioral Problems

Callous–unemotional (CU) traits are characterized by feeling none of the values that people share, feeling no remorse, lacking prosocial feelings, and being unemotional [1]. They are significantly associated with several dimensions of maladaptive personality traits among adolescents, including negative affect, detachment, antagonism, and disinhibition [2]. CU traits can serve as biological markers for studying brain function. For example, they can be valuable for assessing the neural basis of reward processing in adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), oppositional defiant disorder (ODD), and conduct disorder (CD) [3]; they also moderate executive function in children with ADHD and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) [4]. Strong CU traits predict emotional dysregulation [5], antisocial behaviors [1,5,6,7,8], peer-relational dysfunction [9], dissatisfaction with quality of life [10], and lack of guilt and empathy [11]. CU traits also predict treatment responses to established psychological interventions in children with CD [12,13]. Thus, CU traits play vital roles in adolescent mental health.

1.2. CU Traits in Adolescents with ASD and ADHD

ASD and ADHD are among the most early neurodevelopmental disorders and cause disabilities in multiple aspects of brain function [14]. Children with ASD and those with ADHD can exhibit higher levels of CU traits than typically developing (TD) children [4,15,16]. CU traits can help in subgrouping and assessing prognoses and treatment responses in children and adolescents with ASD and ADHD. For example, a study involving boys with ASD revealed that CU traits are not related to the severity of core autistic cognitive deficits such as mind-reading function [17]. Another study involving adolescents with ASD demonstrated that CU traits are associated with specific impairments in fear recognition but not with theory of mind (ToM) or cognitive flexibility [18]. Given that the association between CU traits and fear recognition was also reported in non-ASD populations [19,20,21], the mechanisms underpinning CU traits may be similar between people with and without ASD [16]. These results indicate the unique role of CU traits in subgrouping individuals with ASD. CU traits are also significantly related to impairments in fear recognition and affective difficulties [16,18].
Although not as severe as in those with CD, adolescents with ADHD have higher CU traits than those without ADHD [22]. Regardless of the presence of comorbid CD, CU traits in children with ADHD increase the risk of antisocial personality disorder [23]. CU traits also predict unresponsiveness to pharmacological and behavioral therapy in children with ADHD and comorbid CD [13,24]. Thus, CU traits have clinical importance in adolescents with ASD and ADHD.

1.3. Parent–Adolescent Disagreement on CU Traits

Ensuring the accuracy of informant data is crucial in survey studies [25]. Because CU traits are personality characteristics, their measurement relies on informant reports. Reports of CU traits from adolescents [26,27], parents [4,5,9], and teachers [28] have been used in studies on adolescents; however, the level of agreement among various informants has rarely been examined. Two studies have reported a moderate correlation between self- and parent-reported CU traits in nonreferred adolescents [2,29], whereas another study revealed only a modest correlation between the two in clinic-referred adolescents [30].
No study has examined the agreement or differences between self- and parent-reported CU traits in adolescents with ASD, those with ADHD, and TD adolescents simultaneously. Such an evaluation can help clinicians and researchers determine whether they should collect information from both adolescents and parents or rely on a sole informant. Executive dysfunction is significantly associated with CU traits, including difficulties with cognitive flexibility, attentional switching, and response reversal [31,32,33]. Executive dysfunction may contribute to strong CU traits in individuals with ASD or ADHD [4]. However, disease-specific mechanisms may explain the strong CU traits in these individuals. For example, individuals with ASD have deficits in ToM performance, in the ability to attribute mental states to themselves and others, and in predicting the behavior of others on the basis of the others’ mental states [34]. Both cross-sectional [35] and longitudinal studies [36] have demonstrated how deficits in ToM performance predict CU traits. Oxytocin, an essential hormone in social behaviors [37], may assist in the treatment of the core symptoms of ASD [38]. A study revealed that low levels of salivary oxytocin are associated with not only deficits in social cognition but also high CU traits [39]. Regarding ADHD, higher CU traits are associated with lower omega-3 levels [40], blunted hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis reactivity to stress [41], and less positive parenting [42] in individuals with ADHD. The biological and environmental etiologies of CU traits between individuals with ADHD and ASD further raise the possibility that these individuals may have different levels of awareness of their CU traits.
The measures used to assess CU traits, such as the Inventory of Callous and Unemotional Traits (ICUT) [43] and the Antisocial Process Screening Device [44], contain multiple dimensions that capture various behavioral, affective, and cognitive aspects of CU traits. These dimensions have different associations with behavioral problems, such as bullying among adolescents [45]. However, variations in parent–adolescent agreement across various dimensions of CU traits remain unclear.

1.4. Study Aims

This study examined the levels of parent–adolescent agreement in various dimensions of CU traits and the differences in adolescent-reported and parent-reported CU traits among adolescents with ASD, ADHD, and typical development. We hypothesized that parent–adolescent agreement levels would vary among CU trait dimensions and among the three groups of adolescents. Given that both ASD and ADHD are neurodevelopmental disorders that may make it more difficult for adolescents with ASD and ADHD to be aware of their CU traits, we also hypothesized that the difference between adolescent-reported and parent-reported CU traits among adolescents with ASD and ADHD would be greater than that among TD adolescents.

2. Methods

2.1. Participants

Adolescents with ADHD or ASD were enrolled from three child psychiatry outpatient clinics in Taiwan. The inclusion criteria for adolescents with ADHD were as follows: (1) being aged 11–18 years, (2) having ADHD diagnosed by a certified child psychiatrist according to the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) [14], and (3) currently studying in an inclusive classroom rather than a special education classroom. The inclusion criteria for adolescents with ASD were as follows: (1) being 11–18 years old, (2) having ASD diagnosed by a certified child psychiatrist according to the DSM-5, (3) possessing verbal communication ability, and (4) currently studying in an inclusive classroom rather than a special education classroom. Child psychiatrists reviewed the medical records of adolescents with ADHD or ASD and without the formal diagnosis of intellectual disability who visited outpatient clinics between October 2016 and July 2019. From the outpatient clinics, we consecutively approached 256 adolescents with ADHD and 156 with ASD who met the aforementioned criteria in the outpatient clinics. The child psychiatrists conducted interviews with the adolescents and their parents to determine whether they met the following exclusion criteria: intellectual disability, major psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, or any other cognitive deficit that would result in difficulties understanding the study purposes and completing research questionnaires. On the basis of the interview results, 22 ADHD adolescent–parent dyads and 16 ASD adolescent–parent dyads were excluded.
The child psychiatrists explained the study purposes and procedures to the remaining parent–adolescent dyads and invited them to participate in this study. They were assured that their responses were confidential and that their participation or nonparticipation would not influence their right to receive medical services. Finally, 207 (88.5%) ADHD parent–adolescent dyads and 126 (90%) ASD parent–adolescent dyads agreed to participate in this study.
TD adolescents were recruited through online advertising. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) being 11–18 years old and (2) having no ADHD, ASD, intellectual disability, major psychiatric disorders, or a history of severe brain injury. A child psychiatrist interviewed the adolescents’ parents to confirm that the adolescents met the inclusion criteria and that the parents had no cognitive deficits that might prevent them from understanding the study purposes and completing the questionnaires. Finally, 203 TD parent–adolescent dyads participated in this study. The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kaohsiung Medical University (approval number: KMUHIRB-SV(I)-20150080; date of approval: 5 February 2016).

2.2. Measures

2.2.1. Chinese Version of the ICUT

The ICUT comprises 24 items that are answered on a 4-point Likert scale to assess how appropriately the items describe the participants (0, not at all; 1, somewhat true; 2, very true; and 3, definitely true) [43,46]. This scale comprises three subscales: callousness (e.g., “What I think is right and wrong is different from what other people think”), uncaring (e.g., “I do not care about how well I do at school or work”), and unemotional (e.g., “I do not express my feelings openly”). A higher subscale score represents a higher tendency toward that CU trait. The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the ICUT (C-ICUT) in adolescents were acceptable [47]. Both adolescent-reported and parent-reported CU traits on the C-ICUT were obtained in the present study. Cronbach’s α values of the three C-ICUT subscales reported by the adolescents and parents in the present study ranged from 0.72 to 0.80 and from 0.74 to 0.82, respectively.

2.2.2. Sociodemographic Characteristics

The sociodemographic characteristics of adolescents and their parents recorded in this study were sex and age. Parental duration of education (years) was also recorded.

2.3. Procedure

TD adolescents and adolescents with ADHD or ASD and their parents were invited to complete the research questionnaires in the interview rooms of outpatient clinics after written informed consent was obtained from them. Two master’s degree research assistants conducted individual interviews with the adolescents to collect data on self-reported CU traits. The parents also completed the C-ICUT. The parents could approach the research assistants with questionnaire-related queries and for clarification.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The data were analyzed using SPSS 20.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). We examined the normality of the C-ICUT total and subscale scores based on the adjusted Fisher–Pearson standardized moment coefficient of kurtosis and skewness. Kurtosis and skewness greater than ±2 indicated nonnormality [48]. We examined whether a difference existed in adolescent-reported and parent-reported CU traits between adolescents’ age and sex. The adolescents’ and parents’ age and sex distributions were compared among the TD, ADHD, and ASD groups using analysis of variance and a chi-squared test. C-ICUT total and subscale scores were compared among the three groups using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) after adjustment for sex and age. We examined the level of agreement between adolescent-reported and parent-reported CU traits using a two-way random effects model, consistency, and intraclass correlations (ICCs) among average measures. Negative ICC values were treated as 0 because negative ICC coefficients are not theoretically possible or meaningful [49]. According to Cicchetti [50], parent–adolescent agreement is poor, fair, good, and excellent if the ICC ranges are 0.00–0.39, 0.40–0.59, 0.60–0.74, and 0.75–1.00, respectively. The differences between adolescent-reported and parent-reported scores (parent-reported scores − adolescent-reported scores) were also compared among the three groups using ANCOVA after adjustment for age and sex. Post hoc comparisons were conducted using Shaffer’s correction. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to replicate these comparisons using an age- and sex-matched sample to address possible inappropriate adjustment arising from unequal sample sizes between groups. A two-tailed p value of <0.017 (0.05/3) was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

Table 1 lists the adolescents’ and parents’ sex and age in the TD, ADHD, and ASD groups. Analysis of variance revealed a significant between-group difference in adolescents’ age (F = 9.841, p < 0.001) but not in parents’ age (F = 1.951, p = 0.143). A post hoc comparison indicated that adolescents in the ADHD group were younger than those in the TD and ASD groups. The chi-squared test revealed no significant between-group differences in adolescents’ (χ2 = 5.668, p = 0.059) or parents’ sex distributions (χ2 = 5.678, p = 0.058). The C-ICUT total and subscale scores were normally distributed, with kurtosis and skewness ranging from −0.136 to 1.154 and −0.508 to 1.738, respectively (demonstrating no problematic levels of skewness (i.e., less than ±2). We found that adolescent-reported and parent-reported scores on the callousness and uncaring subscales were significantly lower in girls than in boys, and no difference was observed in age (Supplementary Table S1).
Table 2 presents the ANCOVA results for comparing adolescent-reported and parent-reported C-ICUT scores in the three groups. After the effects of sex and age were controlled, adolescent-reported and parent-reported scores on all three C-ICUT subscales were significantly different among the TD, ADHD, and ASD groups. Post hoc comparisons revealed that both adolescent-reported and parent-reported callousness and uncaring scores in the ASD and ADHD groups were significantly higher than those in the TD group, whereas no significant difference was observed in the scores between the ASD and ADHD groups. Regarding the unemotional subscale, parents in the ASD group reported higher unemotional scores than did those in the ADHD and TD groups, whereas no significant difference was observed in parent-reported scores between the TD and ADHD groups.
Table 3 summarizes the levels of parent–adolescent agreement across the three dimensions of CU traits. The results indicate that across the three groups agreement on the callousness trait was poor and agreement on the uncaring trait was fair. For unemotionality, agreement was fair between parents and TD adolescents but was poor in the other groups.
Table 4 presents the ANCOVA results for comparisons of C-ICUT subscale scores between parents and adolescents in the three groups. After controlling for the effects of sex and age, we found that the differences in adolescent-reported and parent-reported scores on C-ICUT subscales were significantly different in the TD, ADHD, and ASD groups. Post hoc comparisons revealed that the differences in callousness subscale scores in the ASD (mean = 3.05, standard deviation (SD) = 6.51) and ADHD groups (mean = 3.14, SD = 6.20) were significantly higher than those in the TD group (mean = 1.03, SD = 5.32), the difference in uncaring subscale scores in the ASD group (mean = 3.33, SD = 5.18) was significantly higher than that in the TD group (mean = 1.62, SD = 5.06), and the difference in the unemotional subscale scores in the ADHD group (mean = −1.57, SD = 3.75) was significantly higher than that in the ASD group (mean = −0.37, SD = 3.91).
A sensitivity analysis was conducted using the age- and sex-matched sample (see Supplementary Table S2). The patterns of between-group comparisons of parent-reported scores, adolescent-reported scores, and the difference between the two in C-ICUT subscales mostly remained the same (Supplementary Tables S3 and S4), except for the scores between parent-reports and adolescent-reports in the subscale of callousness (p = 0.073), which may have been due to the loss of statistical power because of the decrease in sample size after matching.

4. Discussion

4.1. Differences in CU Traits across Adolescent Groups

The present study demonstrated that both adolescent-reported and parent-reported scores in the callousness and uncaring subscales in the ASD and ADHD groups were greater than those in the TD group. Adolescents with ASD [4,15,16] or ADHD [22] have stronger CU traits than TD adolescents do. Our results indicate that adolescent reports agreed with parent reports on callousness and uncaring traits in the ASD and ADHD groups. However, no significant difference in adolescent-reported unemotionality scores was observed across the three groups, whereas parent-reported unemotionality scores were higher in the ASD group than in the ADHD and TD groups. Thus, clinicians and researchers should consider the heterogeneity of CU traits and seek data from different informants when examining CU traits in adolescents with ASD or ADHD.

4.2. Parent–Adolescent Agreement in CU Traits across Adolescent Groups

The present study demonstrated that parent–adolescent agreement differed across the three CU traits. Agreement on uncaring was fair across the three groups of adolescents. People with the uncaring trait may exhibit a lack of care for others’ feelings and achievements in performing tasks [46]. People in Taiwan have been deeply influenced by Confucianism and ask adolescents to prioritize social harmony and academic performance [51]. Accordingly, in our Taiwanese cohort, parents may detect adolescents’ uncaringness with comparative ease from daily parenting and from teachers’ feedback; this may have contributed to the parent–adolescent agreement on this trait.
Conversely, parent–adolescent agreement on callousness was poor across all three groups. People with callousness may exhibit a lack of empathy, guilt, or remorse for misdeeds [46]. Compared with the uncaring trait, the callousness trait may be less explicit and thus less detectable by parents. Our data also revealed that parent–adolescent agreement on unemotionality was fair in TD adolescents but poor in adolescents with ADHD or ASD. Unemotionality reflects an absence of emotional expression [46]. Both people with ASD [52] and those with ADHD [53] tend to experience difficulties with emotion regulation, which may increase their parents’ difficulty in detecting their unemotionality.
The present study indicated that the ASD and ADHD groups had significantly larger differences than the TD group in scores reported by parents and adolescents on callousness. Moreover, the parent–adolescent score differences in the uncaring trait were significantly larger in the ASD group than in the TD group. Conversely, the parent–adolescent score differences in the unemotional trait in the ADHD group were significantly larger than those in the ASD group. Taken together, our results support the notion that CU traits are a heterogeneous group. ASD and ADHD symptoms and parent–adolescent conflicts may increase parents’ difficulties in evaluating adolescents’ CU traits. Researchers should apply a multi-informant approach in CU trait assessment, especially in adolescents with ASD or ADHD.

4.3. Limitations

This study had several limitations. First, we recruited participants with ASD or ADHD from outpatient clinic units. Whether the results of this study are generalizable to adolescents with ASD and ADHD who did not visit psychiatric units warrants further study. Second, adolescents’ sex and the presence of comorbid CD and ODD symptoms as well as parental age can predict parent–adolescent agreement on CU traits in adolescents with ADHD [54]; however, we did not examine the predictors of parent–adolescent agreement in adolescents with ASD and TD adolescents. Third, we did not control for comorbid psychiatric disorders. Future studies should examine whether comorbid psychiatric disorders influence parent–adolescent agreement on CU traits. Fourth, the present study included adolescents with ADHD or ASD who were studying in an inclusive classroom rather than a special education classroom, and thus they did not have a formal diagnosis of intellectual disability. Adolescents with intellectual disability were also excluded from the TD group. However, we did not examine the precise effect of intelligence on CU traits in adolescents with ASD or ADHD or in TD adolescents. Studies on the association between intelligence and CU traits have indicated conflicting results. Studies involving boys with CD [55], clinic-referred children [56], detained adolescent boys [57], and adolescents with antisocial behaviors [58] have not supported a direct link between CU traits and better verbal or nonverbal intelligence, whereas other studies on incarcerated youths [59] and twin children [60] have reported that some dimensions of CU traits are related to lower intelligence. Thus, relations may vary as a function of trait dimension and types of intelligence. Whether intelligence is associated with CU traits in adolescents with ADHD or ASD warrants further research.

5. Conclusions

Our results reveal that both adolescent-reported and parent-reported scores in the callousness and uncaring subscales of CU traits in the ASD and ADHD groups were higher than those in the TD group. Moreover, parent–adolescent agreement on CU traits varied across the three dimensions of CU traits and across groups of adolescents with various psychiatric diagnoses. Clinicians and researchers should consider the heterogeneity of CU traits and seek data from different informants when examining CU traits in adolescents with ASD or ADHD. On the basis of our findings, we recommend using a multi-informant approach for CU trait assessment, especially for adolescents with ASD or ADHD.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijerph18083972/s1, Table S1: Deomgraphics effect on Parent-Reported and Adolescent-Reported Callous–Unemotional Traits Among all groups; Table S2: Adolescents’ Sex and Age Distributions in TD, ADHD, and ASD Groups; Table S3: Comparisons of Parent-Reported and Adolescent-Reported Callous–Unemotional Traits Among TD, ADHD, and ASD Groups; Table S4: Comparisons of Difference Scores Between Parent-Reported and Adolescent-Reported Callous–Unemotional Traits Among TD, ADHD and ASD Groups.

Author Contributions

C.-L.C.: conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, writing—original draft. T.-L.L.: formal analysis, data curation, conceptualization. R.C.H.: methodology, data curation. P.Y.: methodology, data curation. Y.-L.C.: formal analysis, writing—review and editing. C.-F.Y.: conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, project administration, writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, grant number [MOST 105-2314-B-037-025-MY3].

Institutional Review Board Statement

The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kaohsiung Medical University (approval number: KMUHIRB-SV(I)-20150080; date of approval: 5 February 2016).

Informed Consent Statement

All participants provided written informed consent.

Data Availability Statement

Restrictions apply to the availability of these data. Only researchers of this study can approach the data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Frick, P.; White, S. Research review: The importance of callous-unemotional traits for developmental models of aggressive and antisocial behavior. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 2008, 49, 359–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Decuyper, M.; de Caluwé, E.; de Clercq, B.; de Fruyt, F. Callous-unemotional traits in youth from a DSM-5 trait perspective. J. Pers. Disord. 2014, 28, 334–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Veroude, K.; von Rhein, D.; Chauvin, R.J.M.; van Dongen, E.V.; Mennes, M.J.J.; Franke, B.; Heslenfeld, D.J.; Oosterlaan, J.; Hartman, C.A.; Hoekstra, P.J.; et al. The link between callous-unemotional traits and neural mechanisms of reward processing: An fMRI study. Psychiatr. Res. Neuroimaging. 2016, 255, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Tye, C.; Bedford, R.; Asherson, P.; Ashwood, K.L.; Azadi, B.; Bolton, P.; McLoughlin, G. Callous-unemotional traits moderate executive function in children with ASD and ADHD: A pilot event-related potential study. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 2017, 26, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Moran, P.; Rowe, R.; Flach, C.; Briskman, J.; Ford, T.; Maughan, B.; Scott, S.; Goodman, R. Predictive value of callous-unemotional traits in a large community sample. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2009, 48, 1079–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Byrd, A.L.; Loeber, R.; Pardini, D.A. Understanding desisting and persisting forms of delinquency: The unique contributions of disruptive behavior disorders and interpersonal callousness. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 2012, 53, 371–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. McMahon, R.J.; Witkiewitz, K.; Kotler, J.S.; Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. Predictive validity of callous-unemotional traits measured in early adolescence with respect to multiple antisocial outcomes. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 2010, 119, 752–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Pardini, D.A.; Fite, P.J. Symptoms of conduct disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and callous-unemotional traits as unique predictors of psychosocial maladjustment in boys: Advancing an evidence base for DSM-V. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2010, 49, 1134–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Haas, S.M.; Becker, S.P.; Epstein, J.N.; Frick, P.J. Callous-unemotional traits are uniquely associated with poorer peer functioning in school-aged children. J. Abnorm. Child. Psychol. 2018, 46, 781–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Herpers, P.C.M.; Klip, H.; Rommelse, N.N.J.; Greven, C.U.; Buitelaar, J.K. Associations between high callous-unemotional traits and quality of life across youths with non-conduct disorder diagnoses. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2016, 25, 547–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Waller, R.; Hyde, L.W.; Grabell, A.S.; Alves, M.L.; Olson, S.L. Differential associations of early callous-unemotional, oppositional, and ADHD behaviors: Multiple domains within early-starting conduct problems? J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 2015, 56, 657–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hawes, D.J.; Dadds, M.R. The treatment of conduct problems in children with callous-unemotional traits. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 2005, 73, 737–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Waschbusch, D.A.; Carrey, N.J.; Willoughby, M.T.; King, S.; Andrade, B.F. Effects of methylphenidate and behavior modification on the social and aca demic behavior of children with disruptive behavior disorders: The moderating role of callous/unemotional traits. J. Clin. Child Adolesc. Psychol. 2007, 36, 629–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed.; Arlington American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  15. Bours, C.; Bakker-Huvenaars, M.; Tramper, J.; Bielczyk, N.; Scheepers, F.; Nijhof, K.; Baanders, A.N.; Lambregts-Rommelse, N.N.J.; Medendorp, P.; Glennon, J.C.; et al. Emotional face recognition in male adolescents with autism spectrum disorder or disruptive behavior disorder: An eye-tracking study. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2018, 27, 1143–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Carter-Leno, V.; Bedford, R.; Chandler, S.; White, P.; Yorke, I.; Charman, T.; Pickles, A.; Simonoff, E. Callous-unemotional traits in youth with autism spectrum disorder (ASD): Replication of prevalence estimates and associations with gaze patterns when viewing fearful faces. Dev. Psychopathol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Rogers, J.; Viding, E.; Blair, R.J.; Frith, U.; Happé, F. Autism spectrum disorder and psychopathy: Shared cognitive underpinnings or double hit? Psychol. Med. 2006, 36, 1789–1798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Carter-Leno, V.; Charman, T.; Pickles, A.; Jones, C.R.; Baird, G.; Happé, F.; Simonoff, E. Callous-unemotional traits in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Br. J. Psychiatry 2015, 207, 392–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Marsh, A.A.; Blair, R.J.R. Deficits in facial affect recognition among antisocial populations: A meta-analysis. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2008, 32, 454–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Muñoz, L.C. Callous-unemotional traits are related to combined deficits in recognizing afraid faces and body poses. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2009, 48, 554–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. White, S.F.; Briggs-Gowan, M.J.; Voss, J.L.; Petitclerc, A.; McCarthy, K.R.; Blair, R.J.; Wakschlag, L.S. Can the fear recognition deficits associated with callous-unemotional traits be identified in early childhood? J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 2016, 38, 672–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Herpers, P.C.M.; Rommelse, N.N.J.; Bons, D.M.A.; Buitelaar, J.K.; Scheepers, F.E. Callous—Unemotional traits as a cross-disorders construct. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 2012, 47, 2045–2064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Storebø, O.J.; Simonsen, E. The association between ADHD and antisocial personality disorder (ASPD): A review. J. Atten. Disord. 2016, 20, 815–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Haas, S.M.; Waschbusch, D.A.; Pelham, W.E., Jr.; King, S.; Andrade, B.F.; Carrey, N.J. Treatment response in CP/ADHD children with callous/unemotional traits. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 2011, 39, 541–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sheppard, V. Research Methods for the Social Sciences: An Introduction. Available online: https://pressbooks.bccampus.ca/jibcresearchmethods/front-matter/accessibility/ (accessed on 3 February 2021).
  26. Fanti, K.A.; Demetriou, C.A.; Kimonis, E.R. Variants of callous-unemotional conduct problems in a community sample of adolescents. J. Youth Adolesc. 2013, 42, 964–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Saunders, M.C.; Anckarsäter, H.; Lundström, S.; Hellner, C.; Lichtenstein, P.; Fontaine, N.M.G. The associations between callous-unemotional traits and symptoms of conduct problems, hyperactivity and emotional problems: A study of adolescent twins screened for neurodevelopmental problems. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 2019, 47, 447–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Cecil, C.A.M.; McCrory, E.J.; Barker, E.D.; Guiney, J.; Viding, E. Characterising youth with callous—unemotional traits and concurrent anxiety: Evidence for a high-risk clinical group. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2018, 27, 885–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Muñoz, L.C.; Frick, P.J. The reliability, stability, and predictive utility of the self-report version of the Antisocial Process Screening Device. Scand. J. Psychol. 2007, 48, 299–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Kahn, R.E.; Frick, P.J.; Youngstrom, E.A.; Youngstrom, J.K.; Feeny, N.C.; Findling, R.L. Distinguishing primary and secondary variants of callous-unemotional traits among adolescents in a clinic-referred sample. Psychol. Assess. 2013, 25, 966–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Mitchell, D.; Colledge, E.; Leonard, A.; Blair, R.J.R. Risky decisions and response reversal: Is there evidence of orbitofrontal cortex dysfunction in psychopathic individuals? Neuropsychologia 2002, 40, 2013–2222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Morgan, A.B.; Lilienfeld, S.O. A meta-analytic review of the relation between antisocial behavior and neuropsychological measures of executive function. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2000, 20, 113–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Newman, J.P. Psychopathic behavior: An information processing perspective. In Psychopathy: Theory, Research and Implications for Society; Cooke, D.J., Forth, A.E., Hare, R.D., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1998; pp. 81–104. [Google Scholar]
  34. Baron-Cohen, S.; Leslie, A.M.; Frith, U. Does the autistic child have a theory of mind? Cognition 1985, 21, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sharp, C.; Vanwoerden, S. Social cognition: Empirical contribution. The developmental building blocks of psychopathic traits: Revisiting the role of theory of mind. J. Pers. Disord. 2014, 28, 78–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Centifanti, L.C.M.; Meins, E.; Fernyhough, C. Callous-unemotional traits and impulsivity: Distinct longitudinal relations with mind-mindedness and understanding of others. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 2016, 57, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Hörnberg, H.; Pérez-Garci, E.; Schreiner, D.; Hatstatt-Burklé, L.; Magara, F.; Baudouin, S.; Matter, A.; Nacro, K.; Pecho-Vrieseling, E.; Scheiffele, P. Rescue of oxytocin response and social behaviour in a mouse model of autism. Nature 2020, 584, 252–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ooi, Y.P.; Weng, S.J.; Kossowsky, J.; Gerger, H.; Sung, M. Oxytocin and autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pharmacopsychiatry 2017, 50, 5–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Levy, T.; Bloch, Y.; Bar-Maisels, M.; Gat-Yablonski, G.; Djalovski, A.; Borodkin, K.; Apter, A. Salivary oxytocin in adolescents with conduct problems and callous-unemotional traits. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2015, 24, 1543–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gow, R.V.; Vallee-Tourangeau, F.; Crawford, M.A.; Taylor, E.; Ghebremeskel, K.; Bueno, A.A.; Hibbeln, J.R.; Sumich, A.; Rubia, K. Omega-3 fatty acids are inversely related to callous and unemotional traits in adolescent boys with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fatty Acids 2013, 88, 411–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Stadler, C.; Kroeger, A.; Weyers, P.; Grasmann, D.; Horschinek, M.; Freitag, C.; Clement, H.W. Cortisol reactivity in boys with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and disruptive behavior problems: The impact of callous unemotional traits. Psychiatry Res. 2011, 187, 204–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Graziano, P.A.; Fabiano, G.; Willoughby, M.T.; Waschbusch, D.; Morris, K.; Schatz, N.; Vujnovic, R. Callous-unemotional traits among adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): Associations with parenting. Child Psychiatry Hum. Dev. 2017, 48, 18–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Frick, P.J. Inventory of Callous–Unemotional Traits; University of New Orleans: New Orleans, LA, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  44. Frick, P.J.; Hare, R.D. The Antisocial Process. Screening Device (APSD); Multi-Health Systems: Toronto, ON, Canada, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  45. Fanti, K.A.; Frick, P.J.; Georgiou, S. Linking callous-unemotional traits to instrumental and non-instrumental forms of aggression. J. Psychopathol. Behav. Assess. 2009, 31, 285–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Essau, C.A.; Sasagawa, S.; Frick, P.J. Callous-unemotional traits in a community sample of adolescents. Assessment 2006, 13, 454–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Luo, G. Reliability and validity of Chinese version of the Inventory of Callous and Unemotional Traits in adolescents. Psychol. Tech. Appl. 2015, 3, 29–31. [Google Scholar]
  48. Gravetter, F.J.; Wallnau, L.B.; Forzano, L.-A.B.; Witnauer, J.E. Essentials of Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences; Cengage Learning: Boston, MA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  49. Giraudeau, B. Negative values of the intraclass correlation coefficient are not theoretically possible. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1996, 49, 1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cicchetti, D.V. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol. Assess. 1994, 6, 284–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Triandis, H.C. Individualism-collectivism and personality. J. Pers. 2001, 69, 907–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Reyes, N.M.; Pickard, K.; Reaven, J. Emotion regulation: A treatment target for autism spectrum disorder. Bull. Menninger Clin. 2019, 83, 205–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Christiansen, H.; Hirsch, O.; Albrecht, B.; Chavanon, M.L. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and emotion regulation over the life span. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 2019, 21, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Chen, Y.L.; Hsiao, R.C.; Chou, W.J.; Yen, C.F. Adolescent-parent agreement on callous-unemotional traits in adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Fisher, L.; Blair, R.J.R. Cognitive impairment and its relationship to psychopathic tendencies in children with emotional and behavioral difficulties. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 1998, 26, 511–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Loney, B.R.; Frick, P.J.; Ellis, M.; McCoy, M. Intelligence, callous-unemotional traits, and antisocial behavior. J. Psychopathol. Behav. Assess. 1998, 20, 231–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Muñoz, L.C.; Frick, P.J.; Kimonis, E.R.; Aucoin, K.J. Verbal ability and delinquency: Testing the moderating role of psychopathic traits. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 2008, 49, 414–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Allen, J.L.; Briskman, J.; Humayun, S.; Dadds, M.R.; Scott, S. Heartless and cunning? Intelligence in adolescents with antisocial behavior and psychopathic traits. Psychiatry Res. 2013, 210, 1147–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Salekin, R.T.; Neumann, C.S.; Leistico, A.R.; Zalot, A.A. Psychopathy in youth and intelligence: An investigation of Cleckley’s hypothesis. J. Clin. Child Adolesc. Psychol. 2004, 33, 731–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Fontaine, N.; Barker, E.D.; Salekin, R.T.; Viding, E. Dimensions of psychopathy and their relationships to cognitive functioning in children. J. Clin. Child Adolesc. Psychol. 2008, 37, 690–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table
Table 1. Adolescent and Parent Sex and Age Distributions in TD, ADHD, and ASD Groups.
Table 1. Adolescent and Parent Sex and Age Distributions in TD, ADHD, and ASD Groups.
TDADHDASD
n = 203n = 207n = 126
VariableMean (SD)n (%)Mean (SD)n (%)Mean (SD)n (%)
Adolescents
Age (years)13.94 (2.09) 13.09 (1.81) 13.66 (1.95)
Sex
Girls 46 (22.7) 32 (15.5) 17 (13.5)
Boys 157 (77.3) 175 (84.5) 109 (86.5)
Parents
Age (years)44.17 (4.98) 44.13 (6.43) 45.32 (6.01)
Sex
Females 164 (80.8) 157 (75.8) 109 (86.5)
Males 39 (19.2) 50 (24.2) 17 (13.5)
ADHD: attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; ASD: autism spectrum disorder; SD: standard deviation; TD: typical development.
Table
Table 2. Comparisons of Parent-Reported and Adolescent-Reported Callous–Unemotional Traits Among TD, ADHD, and ASD Groups a.
Table 2. Comparisons of Parent-Reported and Adolescent-Reported Callous–Unemotional Traits Among TD, ADHD, and ASD Groups a.
TDADHDASDF-ValuePost Hoc Comparison b
n = 203n = 207n = 126
VariableMeanSDMeanSDMeanSD
Adolescent-reported
Callousness6.523.778.944.989.895.4621.72 ***ASD = ADHD > TD
Uncaring8.774.3311.184.5410.604.9813.2 ***ASD = ADHD > TD
Unemotionality6.862.527.492.847.562.943.65 *-
Parent-reported
Callousness7.554.7212.075.4112.945.6551.36 ***ASD = ADHD > TD
Uncaring10.394.5413.704.3413.925.0731.29 ***ASD = ADHD > TD
Unemotionality6.032.725.923.007.193.027.91 ***ASD > ADHD = TD
a: ANCOVA adjusted for sex and age; b: Shaffer’s correction; ADHD: attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; ASD: autism spectrum disorder; SD: standard deviation; TD: typical development; *: p < 0.05; ***: p < 0.001.
Table
Table 3. Correlation Between Parent-Reported and Adolescent-Reported Callous–Unemotional Traits Among TD, ADHD, and ASD Groups: Pearson’s Correlation.
Table 3. Correlation Between Parent-Reported and Adolescent-Reported Callous–Unemotional Traits Among TD, ADHD, and ASD Groups: Pearson’s Correlation.
VariablesTDADHDASD
ICC ICC ICC
Callousness0.343 **0.312 **0.367 **
Uncaring0.470 ***0.460 ***0.492 ***
Unemotionality0.408 ***0.1780.241
ICC: intraclass correlations; **: p < 0.01; ***: p < 0.001.
Table
Table 4. Comparisons of Difference Scores Between Parent-Reported and Adolescent-Reported Callous–Unemotional Traits Among TD, ADHD, and ASD Groups a.
Table 4. Comparisons of Difference Scores Between Parent-Reported and Adolescent-Reported Callous–Unemotional Traits Among TD, ADHD, and ASD Groups a.
TDADHDASDF-ValuePost Hoc Comparison b
n = 203n = 207n = 126
VariableMeanSDMeanSDMeanSD
Callousness1.035.323.146.203.056.5151.36 ***ASD = ADHD > TD
Uncaring1.625.062.524.863.335.1831.29 ***ASD > TD
Unemotionality−0.833.14−1.573.75−0.373.917.91 ***ADHD > ASD
a: ANCOVA adjusted for sex and age; b: Shaffer’s correction; ADHD: attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; ASD: autism spectrum disorder; SD: standard deviation; TD: typical development; ***: p < 0.001.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chang, C.-L.; Liu, T.-L.; Hsiao, R.C.; Yang, P.; Chen, Y.-L.; Yen, C.-F. Callous–Unemotional Traits among Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder, Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, or Typical Development: Differences between Adolescents’ and Parents’ Views. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 3972. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18083972

AMA Style

Chang C-L, Liu T-L, Hsiao RC, Yang P, Chen Y-L, Yen C-F. Callous–Unemotional Traits among Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder, Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, or Typical Development: Differences between Adolescents’ and Parents’ Views. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(8):3972. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18083972

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chang, Chen-Lin, Tai-Ling Liu, Ray C. Hsiao, Pinchen Yang, Yi-Lung Chen, and Cheng-Fang Yen. 2021. "Callous–Unemotional Traits among Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder, Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, or Typical Development: Differences between Adolescents’ and Parents’ Views" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 8: 3972. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18083972

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop