Organically Linking Green Development and Ecological Environment Protection in Poyang Lake, China Using a Social-Ecological System (SES) Framework
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Data Collection
2.3. Social-Ecological System Framework (SES)
3. Results
3.1. Current Situation of Wetlands in Poyang Lake Region
3.1.1. Poyang Lake Wetland Ecosystem (ECO)
3.1.2. Social, Economic, and Political Setting (S) of Poyang Lake Wetland
3.1.3. Poyang Lake Wetland Resource System
3.1.4. Poyang Lake Wetland Governance System (GS)
3.2. Changes in the Ecological and Social System of Wetlands in Poyang Lake
3.3. Inter-Relationships in the Ecological and Social System of Wetlands in Poyang Lake
4. Discussion
4.1. Analysis of Influencing Factors
4.1.1. Insufficient Investment in Rural Areas in the Lakeside Area
4.1.2. Contradictions between Protection and Development of Lakeside Area
4.1.3. Difficulty in Implementing Grassroots Policies
4.1.4. Outflow of Rural Labour in Poyang Lake Area
4.2. Action Scenario Setting
4.2.1. Ecological Environmental Protection Projects
- (1)
- Ecological compensation and implementing the return of farmland to wetland is crucial. After the 1998 flood in the Yangtze River basin, according to the plan of the “project of returning farmland to wetland” and the actual situation of Poyang Lake, it was necessary for the farmland surrounding the lake to be completely returned to wetland to increase the flood storage capacity and enhance the wetland ecosystem service function of Poyang Lake. Hence, farming and livestock breeding in the dike region was banned [54]. Therefore, the key to implementing the policy of returning farmland to wetlands and providing ecological compensation lies in scientifically determining the compensation standard and mode of compensation to effectively increase the enthusiasm of farmers to participate in the transformation of farmland to wetlands [55]. As a micro-decision-making body for wetland protection, the farmers’ willingness to transform farmland to wetland is the basic premise and key to actively promote wetland protection [56].
- (2)
- Wetland ecological restoration management restores the wetland plant communities at a large scale and rewilds wetlands with native species, such as apex predators, to rebuild the balanced ecosystem in large areas of permanent and intermittent wetlands in the Poyang Lake area. In the process of ecological restoration and management, we can consider adding value to macrobenthos to quickly restore the health and stability of the ecosystem, improve the quality of the ecosystem, and enhance ecosystem services [57]. Developing and adopting adequate policy instruments are crucial for reversing the loss of wetland fauna (caused by overfishing and poaching) and exploitation and trade of threatened species, so as to conserve biodiversity and aid in restoration activities [58]. In addition, we proposed lakeshore naturalisation by considering the topographic features of Poyang Lake, reintegrating waterways and bays through wetland systems, promoting habitat restoration, improving water quality, and strengthening flood control mechanisms.
- (3)
- A long-term mechanism for cross-basin protection and pollution prevention and control should be established. In 2018, in Jiangxi province, 1.33 km2 of farmland was transformed to wetlands; a total of 102 new wetland protection sites were added, including 97 wetland protection communities and five water source protection sites; 131 km2 of area was newly developed to wetlands; the wetland protection rate increased by 1.45%. However, the influence of administrative division makes it difficult to realise the protection of the whole basin of Poyang Lake. In the future, it will be necessary to protect the Poyang Lake wetlands and cooperate with the cities of Nanchang, Jiujiang, and Shangrao as a whole to strive for environment policy-related, project implementation-related, and financial support. There have been studies that have concluded that water resources governance could be managed through a river chief system [59]. We further consider that through four levels of cooperation (city, county, township, and village), the individual protection measures such as the water quality, flood control, and drainage will be combined and upgraded to a long-term pollution prevention and control mechanism covering rivers and lakes, water function areas, and water ecology for the complete management of the Yangtze River, Poyang Lake, and other tributaries. We also recommend creating a benign ecological cycle system, harmonisation across jurisdiction [60], and an ecological safety barrier in the wetlands of Poyang Lake to provide an ecological environment that will ensure green development.
4.2.2. Ecological Priority to Green Development
- (1)
- We suggest establishing a Poyang Lake National Park. By breaking the boundaries of administrative regions and industries and coordinating natural resources and ecological management within the Poyang Lake region, a National Park must be built covering the upstream and downstream areas of Poyang Lake. In the national park, unified restoration and protection of various ecosystems of mountains, rivers, and lakes can be implemented, along with in situ monitoring and protection of rare and endangered wild animals and plants, such as migratory birds and large aquatic creatures. The areas with unique natural landscapes and rich biodiversity can be protected, and green development of the Poyang Lake basin [61] can be promoted to shift the focus from a “resource economy” to an “ecological economy” and realise the harmonious coexistence between man and nature.
- (2)
- Scientific and technological support systems for coordinated development can be improved using big data, 3S, the Internet of Things, and other information technologies; a dynamic monitoring system is being built for the internal features, which includes mountains, water, forest, farmland, lake, and grass to strengthen the dynamic monitoring capacity of the Poyang Lake ecosystem. Scientific research must be encouraged to assess the ecological health of wetlands and ecosystem service functions and the impact of industrial development on the environment within the ecological economic zone. These technical solutions should also be applied to other ecologically fragile areas. This is because only with a clear understanding of the basics can these areas be better equipped to formulate conservation and development policies.
- (3)
- Promoting the service industry with green development is crucial. The Poyang Lake area is rich in tourism resources, complete in various tourism elements, and has a strong tourism reception capacity, which is the basis for the development of the modern service industry. First, we need to integrate the tourism resources in nature (including humanities, health, and wellness) from Nanchang, Jiujiang, and Shangrao as well as the surrounding cities. Attention must be given to designing cross-regional religious culture boutique theme tourist routes, with Longhu Mountain (Longhu Mountain is located 20 km southwest of Yingtan city, Jiangxi province, and is the birthplace of Chinese Taoism, a world natural heritage and a world geological park) and Sanqing Mountain (Sanqing Mountain is located at the junction of Yushan county and Dexing city in Shangrao city, Jiangxi province, China; Sanqing Mountain is a famous Taoist mountain, a world natural heritage site, a world geological park, and the source of the Xinjiang River) as the core, to enhance the influence of the all-for-one tourism concept in the Poyang Lake region at regional and global levels. Second, on the basis of the ecological functional zoning of the Poyang Lake basin, a rational division of labour between upstream and downstream counties will be carried out [62], including wetland ecotourism and recreation, ecological agriculture and forestry, fishery breeding, and ecological characteristic industries. Both models, if they could be adopted in other developing countries, would reduce direct damage to local natural resources and would also develop local economies.
- (4)
- We propose developing modern agriculture and building “beautiful villages” in the region. First, it is important promote modern agriculture, devise and promote green technologies, and adopt renewable energy sources, such as photovoltaic (PV) and wind power, which do not adversely impact wetlands [63]. Second, it is important to optimise the spatial layout of agriculture and build a national supply base (for bulk high-quality green agricultural products) and an aquaculture base. Third, production and transaction costs should be lowered through collective cooperative organisations to reduce the contradiction between the decentralised operation of small farmers and the standardised development of agriculture at a large scale. Fourth, we must improve the condition of rural roads, ensure the safety of water sources, and improve rural infrastructure. Implementation of agricultural modernisation in the Poyang Lake area not only increases the income of farmers, but also encourages young people to return to the villages. Additionally, competitive green agricultural industry chains of grains, fruits and vegetables, and fish and shrimp can be maintained along with the natural environment and “beautiful villages”. This approach is in line with the Chinese government’s commitment to the UN sustainable development goals for 2030.
4.2.3. Organisation and Implementation of Organic Linking between Ecological Protection and Green Development
- (1)
- The supply of a new system is the core element for achieving organic convergence between ecological protection and green development. Some studies have concluded that one of the important advantages of China’s national governance system is that, when faced with major problems, it provides new institutional supplies to cope with rapid changes in the ecological environment and socio-economic conditions [64,65]. On this basis, we believe that for the ecological protection and green development of Poyang Lake, it is extremely important to introduce a new system, improve the ecological protection policy, improve the capacity building of the grassroots staff, and encourage social subjects in the lakeside area to participate in environmental protection and green development.
- (2)
- Credible commitment is a key condition for the system to operate. As the ecological governance system in China is dominated by the administrative authorities, the provincial government of Jiangxi province can act as the leading authority to define the ownership of the Poyang Lake wetland as public property and identify the limits of its resources. In addition, the use of performance appraisal and environmental monitoring enables the effective supervision of the involved entities, which avoids the recurrence of excessive law enforcement. A commitment system covering provinces, cities, counties, and townships can be formed to determine the boundaries of authority and responsibility of units at all levels, solve the problems in the implementation of policies at the grassroots level, and lay the foundation for the change of ecological governance in the Poyang Lake basin.
- (3)
- Implementing a dynamic assessment system is suggested to strengthen assessment and supervision. In the four-level administrative system of the Chinese Government, the central government and higher-level governments always hold the power of supervision and inspection [65]. Therefore, the utilisation of performance appraisal and environmental monitoring will enable the effective monitoring of participating subjects by higher levels of government. When the ecological environment generates externalities, as environmental performance is integrated into the hierarchical system of government operation at all levels, the monitoring mechanism within the administrative system can also work effectively, despite the specificity of the ecological and environmental problems in the large-scale space and time of the Poyang Lake basin in Jiangxi province [64]. Intergovernmental management of ecological problems through administrative subcontracting can solve the problem of ensuring regional development through ecological protection.
- (4)
- We recommend estimating capital investment and formulating a fund-raising plan, including increasing and implementing government funding at all levels. This will help in dynamically adjusting the funding to favour urgent projects. The funds can first be dissolved to the three municipalities in the lakeside regions, and after achieving results in utilising the funds aids to strengthen the responsibilities of local entities, allocated to the Poyang Lake Ecological Economic Zone and the entire Jiangxi province. The economy of residents of the lake area should be decentralised to reduce wealth inequality by assisting more people in relative poverty and it must be ensured that prices, taxation, and incentive systems take into account the real costs imposed by consumption patterns on wetlands [16]. Further, we can accelerate the promotion of the market-oriented allocation of resources and environment in the Poyang Lake basin, make full use of market mechanisms to broaden financing channels, and ensure the implementation of ecological environmental protection and green development in the lake area.
- (5)
- In addition, public participation should be encouraged. Past models of conservation and development have produced a large number of experienced individuals with a wide range of skills and experience, which is an advantage that is not available worldwide. Outdoor wetland education should be increased for children and adults, along with the involvement of society, including local and indigenous communities, for the management of wetlands in the future. The role of individual residents in solving the multitasking problems in the protection and development of Poyang Lake is very important because it requires rich accumulation of human capital.
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Variable | Data Source |
---|---|
Annual average temperature | Jiangxi Statistical Yearbook 2018 |
Annual precipitation | Jiangxi Statistical Yearbook 2018 |
Annual relative humidity | Jiangxi Statistical Yearbook 2018 |
Type of pollution | Jiangxi Statistical Yearbook 2018 |
Total industrial wastewater discharge | Jiangxi Statistical Yearbook 2018 |
Total industrial emissions | Jiangxi Statistical Yearbook 2018 |
Average water level | 2015 Poyang Lake Scientific Research Report |
Average annual siltation of sediment | Chen Minkun, Xu Xibao (2021) as [41] |
Number of phytoplankton species | Chen Minkun, Xu Xibao (2021) as [41] |
Total storage capacity | 2015 Poyang Lake Scientific Research Report |
Population that faces poverty | http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2020-04/27/content_5506419.htm |
Regional GDP | Jiangxi Statistical Yearbook 2018 |
Primary industry | Jiangxi Statistical Yearbook 2018 |
Total fiscal revenue | Jiangxi Statistical Yearbook 2018 |
Total grain output | Jiangxi Statistical Yearbook 2018 |
Per capita disposable income of urban residents | Jiangxi Statistical Yearbook 2018 |
Per capita disposable income of rural residents | Jiangxi Statistical Yearbook 2018 |
River wetland | Jiangxi Statistical Yearbook 2018 |
Lake wetland | Jiangxi Statistical Yearbook 2018 |
Swamp | Jiangxi Statistical Yearbook 2018 |
Artificial wetland | Jiangxi Statistical Yearbook 2018 |
Fish farming area | Jiangxi Statistical Yearbook 2018 |
Fishery aquaculture yield | Jiangxi Statistical Yearbook 2018 |
References
- Yanli, L.; Sibao, D.; Rongcheng, W.; Yu, W. Sustainable Development of Vulnerable Ecological Regions under the Perspective of Regional Externalities. China Popul. Resour. Environ. 2010, 20, 68–73. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Yahua, W.; Rui, G.; Qingguo, M. Crisis and Response of Chinese Rural Public Affair Governance. J. Tsinghua Univ. 2016, 31, 23–29 + 195. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Zehong, L.; Yongqing, B.; Jiulin, S.; Suocheng, D.; Jingnan, L. Ecological Civilization Construction in Ecologically Fragile Poverty-Stricken Areas in Western China. Strateg. Study CAE 2019, 21, 80–86. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Water, C.D. Health, and the Economic-Canada Green Plan. Res. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 2019, 63, 835. [Google Scholar]
- Pearce, D. Environmentalism and the Green Economy. Environ. Plan. A 1990, 22, 852–854. [Google Scholar]
- Duthie, D. How to Grow a Green Economy. New Sci. 2001, 137, 39–43. [Google Scholar]
- Rojšek, I. From Red to Green: Towards the Environmental Management in the Country in Transition. J. Bus. Ethics 2001, 33, 37–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- White, D.F. A Green Industrial Revolution? Sustainable Technological Innovation in a Global Age. Environ. Pol. 2002, 11, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, E.; Cloke, J.; Gent, D.; Johnson, P.H.; Hill, C. Green Growth or Ecological Commodification: Debating the Green Economy in the Global South. Geogr. Ann. B 2014, 96, 245–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Schulz, C.; Bailey, I. The Green Economy and Post-Growth Regimes: Opportunities and Challenges for Economic Geography. Geogr. Ann. Ser. B Hum. Geogr. 2014, 96, 277–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yando, E.S.; Osland, M.J.; Jones, S.F.; Hester, M.W. Jump-Starting Coastal Wetland Restoration: A Comparison of Marsh and Mangrove Foundation Species. Restor. Ecol. 2019, 27, 1145–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wenmin, H.; Guo, L.; Gao, Z.; Jia, G.; Yi, L. Assessment of the Impact of the Poplar Ecological Retreat Project on Water Conservation in the Dongting Lake Wetland Region Using the InVEST Model. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mansur, A.V.; Brondízio, E.S.; Roy, S.; Hetrick, S.; Vogt, N.D.; Newton, A. An Assessment of Urban Vulnerability in the Amazon Delta and Estuary: A Multi-Criterion Index of Flood Exposure, Socio-Economic Conditions and Infrastructure. Sustain. Sci. 2016, 11, 625–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sebesvari, Z.; Renaud, F.G.; Haas, S.; Tessler, Z.; Hagenlocher, M.; Kloos, J.; Szabo, S.; Tejedor, A.; Kuenzer, C. A Review of Vulnerability Indicators for Deltaic Social–Ecological Systems. Sustain. Sci. 2016, 11, 575–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Srinivas, R.; Singh, A.P.; Dhadse, K.; Garg, C.; Deshmukh, A. Sustainable Management of a River Basin by Integrating an Improved Fuzzy Based Hybridized SWOT Model and Geo-Statistical Weighted Thematic Overlay Analysis. J. Hydrol. 2018, 563, 92–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Finlayson, C.M.; Davies, G.T.; Moomaw, W.R.; Chmura, G.L.; Natali, S.M.; Perry, J.E.; Roulet, N.; Sutton-Grier, A.E. The Second Warning to Humanity—Providing a Context for Wetland Management and Policy. Wetlands 2019, 39, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- An-gang, H.U.; Shao-jie, Z. Green Development: Functional Definition, Mechanism Analysis and Development Strategy. China Popul. Resour. Environ. 2014, 24, 14–20. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Xiangmin, X.U. Transcending Sustainable Development View through Green Development Thought and Innovation of Green Legal System. Leg. Forum 2018, 33, 5–19. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Yu, L. Insisting on High-Quality Ecological Protection of the Yellow River and Promoting High-Quality Green Development of the River Basin. Environ. Prot. 2020, 48, 22–27. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Chengcai, T.; Wenjing, F.; Lei, Z.H.U. The Discussion on Development Model of Wetland Ecotourism for Yeya Lake in Beijing. Ecol. Econ. 2014, 30, 132–134. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Wenbiao, R. The Organic Linking of Small-Scale Farmers with Modern Agricultural Development in China: Empirical Evidence, Outstanding Contradictions and Path Choice. China Rural Surv. 2019, 1, 15–32. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Yiqing, S.; Ming, Q.; Yahua, W. The Impact of Farmland Transfer on Rural Collective Action under the Scenario of Labor Outmigration:A Research Based on Social-Ecological System (SES)Framework. Manag. World 2020, 36, 185–198. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Walker, B.; Holling, C.S.; Carpenter, S.R.; Kinzig, A.P. Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability in Social-Ecological Systems. Ecol. Soc. 2004, 9, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Folke, C.; Hahn, T.; Olsson, P.; Norberg, J. Adaptive Governance of Social-Ecological Systems. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2005, 30, 441–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liu, J.G.; Dietz, T.; Carpenter, S.R.; Alberti, M.; Folke, C.; Moran, E.; Pell, A.N.; Deadman, P.; Kratz, T.; Lubchenco, J.; et al. Complexity of Coupled Human and Natural Systems. Science 2007, 317, 1513–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ostrom, E. A Diagnostic Approach for Going beyond Panaceas. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 15181–15187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Ostrom, E. A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems. Science 2009, 325, 419–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ostrom, E. Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems. Am. Econ. Rev. 2010, 100, 641–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yanmei, Y.; Yaoben, L.; Shuchang, L.; Ming, L. Social-Ecological System (SES) Analysis Framework for Application in Ecological Restoration Engineering of Mountains-Rivers-Forests-Farmlands-Lakes-Grasslands: Utilizing the Source Area of Qiantang River in Zhejiang Province as an Example. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2019, 39, 8846–8856. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Mcginnis, M.D.; Ostrom, E. Social-Ecological System Framework: Initial Changes and Continuing Challenges. Ecol. Soc. 2014, 19, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Haibo, Q.; Xingjun, R.; Yingming, L. Research on Sustainable Grassland Governance Mechanisms in China Based on Social-Ecological System Framework. J. Gansu Admin. Inst. 2018, 3, 104–117. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Shijun, M.; Rusong, W. The Social-Economic-Natural Complex Ecosystem. Acta Ecol. Sin. 1984, 1, 1–9. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Levin, S.A. Fragile Dominion: Complexity and the Commons, 3rd ed.; Basic Books: New York, NY, USA, 2000; pp. 154–196. [Google Scholar]
- Leslie, H.M.; Basurto, X.; Nenadovic, M.; Sievanen, L.; Cavanaugh, K.C.; Cota-Nieto, J.J.; Erisman, B.E.; Finkbeiner, E.; Hinojosa-Arango, G.; Moreno-Báez, M.; et al. Operationalizing the Social-Ecological Systems Framework to Assess Sustainability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 5979–5984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Brondizio, E.S.; Ostrom, E.; Young, O.R. Connectivity and the Governance of Multilevel Social-Ecological Systems: The Role of Social Capital. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2009, 34, 253–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Basurto, X.; Gelcich, S.; Ostrom, E. The Social–Ecological System Framework as a Knowledge Classificatory System for Benthic Small-Scale Fisheries. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2013, 23, 1366–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Virapongse, A.; Brooks, S.; Metcalf, E.C.; Zedalis, M.; Gosz, J.; Kliskey, A.; Alessa, L. A Social-Ecological Systems Approach for Environmental Management. J. Environ. Manag. 2016, 178, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Brondizio, E.S.; Vogt, N.D.; Mansur, A.V.; Anthony, E.J.; Costa, S.; Hetrick, S. A Conceptual Framework for Analyzing Deltas as Coupled Social–Ecological Systems: An Example from the Amazon River Delta. Sustain. Sci. 2016, 11, 591–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seeteram, N.A.; Engel, V.; Mozumder, P. Implications of a Valuation Study for Ecological and Social Indicators Associated with Everglades Restoration. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 627, 792–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andrews, S.S.; Karlen, D.L.; Cambardella, C.A. The Soil Management Assessment Framework: A Quantitative Soil Quality Evaluation Method. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2004, 68, 1945–1962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Minkun, C.; Xibao, X. Lake Poyang Ecosystem Services Changes in the Last 30 Years. J. Lake Sci. 2021, 33, 309–318. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Z.; Lu, L.; Jiao, G.; Jiang, J.; Ye, Q. Analysis of the Correlations between Environmental Factors and Rare Cranes in the Poyang Lake Region of China. J. Great Lakes Res. 2018, 44, 140–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiaoming, G.; Jie, G. How to Effectively Connect Poverty Alleviation and Rural Revitalization Policy Implementation. J. Soc. Theor. Guide 2019, 09, 60–62. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Q.; Ye, X.C.; Werner, A.D.; Li, Y.; Yao, J.; Li, X.; Xu, C. An Investigation of Enhanced Recessions in Poyang Lake: Comparison of Yangtze River and Local Catchment Impacts. J. Hydrol. 2014, 517, 425–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sterling, E.; Ticktin, T.; Morgan, T.K.; Cullman, G.; Alvira, D.; Andrade, P.; Bergamini, N.; Betley, E.; Burrows, K.; Caillon, S.; et al. Culturally Grounded Indicators of Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems. J. Environ. Soc. 2017, 8, 63–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shengwei, T. The Organic Integration of Poverty Alleviation and Rural Revitalization Strategies: Goal Orientation, Key Areas and Measures. Chin. Rural Econ. 2020, 8, 2–12. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Jingbo, S. Survival Situation of Fishermen in Poyang Lake and the Difficulties and Countermeasures for Change of Production and Occupation. Jiangxi Fish. Sci. Technol. 2017, 4, 44–46. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Frawley, T.H.; Crowder, L.B.; Broad, K. Heterogeneous Perceptions of Social-Ecological Change among Small-Scale Fishermen in the Central Gulf of California: Implications for Adaptive Response. Front. Mar. Sci. 2019, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, Y.; Rao, F.; Shuqin, J. Eco-Environmental Concerns in the Organic Connection between Poverty Alleviation and Rural Revitalization. Reform 2019, 10, 141–148. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Xiwen, C. Implementing the Rural Revitalization Strategy and Promoting Agricultural and Rural Modernization. J. China Agric. Univ. Soc. Sci. Ed. 2018, 35, 5–12. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Nguyen, T.T.; Do, T.L.; Bühler, D.; Hartje, R.; Grote, U. Rural Livelihoods and Environmental Resource Dependence in Cambodia. Ecol. Econ. 2015, 120, 282–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.C.; Westlund, H.; Klaesson, J. Report from a Chinese Village 2019: Rural Homestead Transfer and Rural Vitalization. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6714–6728. [Google Scholar]
- Feng, L.; Hu, C.; Chen, X.; Cai, X.; Tian, L.; Gan, W. Assessment of Inundation Changes of Poyang Lake Using MODIS Observations between 2000 and 2010. Remote Sens. Environ. 2012, 121, 80–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Feng, J.; Zheng-lei, X.I.E.; Jun-bang, W.; Shu-hua, L.F.Q.I. Study on Land Reclamation around Poyang Lake in the Abandoned Farmland in the Context of the Policy for Converting Farmland to Lake. China Land Sci. 2017, 31, 44–50. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- HongGen, Z.; HuiZhen, J.; LanYuan, K.; Feng, W.U. An Empirical Analysis of Wetland Restoration Compensation Standards Based on Farmers’ WTA: Survey Data from 1009 Farmers in Poyang Lake. Fin. Trade Res. 2015, 26, 57–64. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Kong, F.; Xiong, K.; Zhang, N. Determinants of Farmers’ Willingness to Pay and Its Level for Ecological Compensation of Poyang Lake Wetland, China: A Household-Level Survey. Sustainability 2014, 6, 6714–6728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gann, G.D.; Mcdonald, T.; Walder, B.; Aronson, J.; Nelson, C.R.; Jonson, J.; Hallett, J.G.; Eisenberg, C.; Guariguata, M.R.; Liu, J.; et al. International principles and standards for the practice of ecological restoration. Restor. Ecol. 2019, 27 (Suppl. S1), 3–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lepczyk, C.A.; Aronson, M.F.J.; Evans, K.L.; Goddard, M.A.; Lerman, S.B.; MacIvor, J.S. Biodiversity in the City: Fundamental Questions for Understanding the Ecology of Urban Green Spaces for Biodiversity Conservation. BioScience 2017, 67, 799–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, Y.; Chen, X.; Tortajada, C. River Chief System as a Collaborative Water Governance Approach in China. Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 2020, 36, 610–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hualin, X.; Peng, W.; Hongsheng, H. Ecological Risk Assessment of Land Use Change in the Poyang Lake Eco-Economic Zone, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2013, 10, 328–346. [Google Scholar]
- Bell-James, J.; Boardman, T.; Foster, R. Can’t see the (mangrove) forest for the trees: Trends in the legal and policy recognition of mangrove and coastal wetland ecosystem services in Australia. Ecosyst. Serv. 2020, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhongyuan, Y. Study on the Optimization of Hainan Regional Governance System Based on Watershed Social Ecosystem. J. Hainan Norm. Univ. Nat. Sci. 2020, 33, 287–298. [Google Scholar]
- Acosta, C.; Ortega, M.; Bunsen, T.; Koirala, B.P.; Ghorbani, A. Facilitating Energy Transition through Energy Commons: An Application of Socio-Ecological Systems Framework for Integrated Community Energy Systems. Sustainability 2018, 10, 366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Li, X.; Yang, X.; Wei, Q.; Zhang, B. Authoritarian Environmentalism and Environmental Policy Implementation in China. Resour. Conserv. Recy. 2019, 145, 86–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xueguang, Z. Lian Hong. Modes of Governance in the Chinese Bureaucracy: A “Control Rights” Theory. J. Sociol. Stud. 2012, 27, 69–93. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
Related Ecosystem (ECO) | Resource System (RS) | Actor (A) |
---|---|---|
ECO1 Climate characteristics * -ECO11 Hydrothermal conditions --ECO111 Average annual temperature --ECO112 Average annual precipitation --ECO113 Annual relative humidity -ECO12 Physical geography --ECO121 Altitude ECO2 Type of pollution * ECO3 Flow of resources * | RS1 Resource Type * -RS11 Types of wetland resources RS2 Clear resource boundaries RS3 Size of the resource system* -RS31 Fish farming area -RS32 Wetland area per capita RS4 Output of resource system* -RS41 Fishery aquaculture yield RS5 Balance RS6 System dynamic predictability RS7 Position | A1 Number of relevant actors A2 Socio-economic attributes A3 History or past experience A4 Social status A5 leadership A6 Social capital A7 Social Ecosystem Concept A8 Dependence on resources A9 Available technology |
Social, Economic, Political Setting (S) | Resource Unit (RU) | Interaction (I) |
S1 Economic development * -S11 Regional economic level --S111 Gross Domestic Product (GDP) --S112 Primary industry output value --S113 Revenue --S114 Total grain output --S115 Urban residents’ income --S116 Rural residents’ income S2 Demographic trends * -S21 Total population --S211 Agriculture and forestry population --S212 Fishery population S3 Political stability * -S31 Central government attention --S311 Impact on the Yangtze River -S32 Local government attention S4 Other governance systems S5 Market S6 Technology | RU1 Resource unit mobility RU2 Renewal or growth rate RU3 Interaction between resource units RU4 Economic Value RU5 Scale RU6 Notable mark RU7 Temporal and spatial distribution | I1 The harvest volume of different users I2 Information sharing among us-ers I3 Negotiation process I4 Conflicts between users I5 Investment Activities I6 Self-organising action |
Governance System (GS) | Outcome (O) | |
GS1 Government organisation GS2 Non-Governmental Organisations (NGO) GS3 Property structure GS4 Implementation plan (province, city) -GS41 Ecological migration (local funds) GS5 Collective selection rules (province, city) -GS51 Local financial support GS6 Protection policy (national) * -GS61 Ecological protection project and policy --GS611 Returning farmland to wetland (returning farmland to lake) Project --GS612 Wetland ecological compensation mechanism --GS613 No fishing season subsidy GS7 Green development project GS8 Monitoring and inspection process | O1 Social performance evaluation O2 ecological performance evaluation O3 Other SES system externalities |
Variable | Nanchang City | Jiujiang City | Shangrao City |
---|---|---|---|
ECO1 Climate characteristics (2017) | |||
-ECO11 Hydrothermal conditions | |||
--ECO111 Annual average temperature (°C) | 19 | 17 | 19 |
--ECO112 Annual precipitation (mm) | 1611 | 1967 | 1866 |
--ECO113 Annual relative humidity (%) | 73 | 81 | 73 |
ECO2 Type of pollution (2017) | |||
-ECO21 Total industrial wastewater discharge (10 kilotons) | 3861 | 7904 | 6318 |
-ECO22 Total industrial emissions (TMC) | 1876 | 2601 | 1317 |
Variable | Nanchang City | Jiujiang City | Shangrao City |
---|---|---|---|
S1 Economic Development (2017) | |||
-S11 Regional economic level | |||
--S111 Regional GDP (100 million yuan) | 5003 | 2414 | 2024 |
--S112 Primary industry (100 million yuan) | 192 | 193 | 247 |
--S113 Total fiscal revenue (100 million yuan) | 783 | 461 | 319 |
--S114 Total grain output (10,000 tons) | 238 | 173 | 352 |
--S115 Per capita disposable income of urban residents (yuan) | 37,675 | 32,592 | 31,853 |
--S116 Per capita disposable income of rural residents (yuan) | 16,364 | 13,303 | 12,174 |
S2 Demographic trends (2017) | |||
-S21 Total population (ten thousand people) | 546 | 487 | 678 |
S3 Political factors | |||
-S31 Central importance | High | High | Middle |
--S311 Impact on Yangtze River basin | High | High | Middle |
Variable | Nanchang City | Jiujiang City | Shangrao City |
---|---|---|---|
RS1 resource type: | |||
-RS11 wetland resource type: | |||
River wetland (ha) | 33,842 | 40,824 | 47,083 |
Lake wetland (ha) | 95,603 | 174,597 | 96,927 |
Swamp (ha) | 9452 | 1766 | 14,156 |
Artificial wetland (ha) | 14,375 | 47,632 | 33,065 |
Total (ha) | 153,272 | 264,819 | 191,231 |
RS3 Scale of Resource System: | |||
-RS31 Fish farming area (ha) | 53,605 | 78,001 | 79,530 |
RS4 Output of resource system: | |||
-RS41 Fishery aquaculture yield (kg/ha) | 6328 | 4836 | 5580 |
Variable | Nanchang City | Jiujiang City | Shangrao City |
---|---|---|---|
GS1 Government organisation | YES | YES | YES |
GS2 Non-Governmental organisations (NGO) | YES | YES | YES |
GS5 Collective selection rules (province, city) | |||
-GS51 Local financial support | YES | YES | YES |
GS6 Protection policy (national) * | YES | YES | NA |
-GS61 Ecological protection project and policy | YES | YES | YES |
--GS611 Returning farmland to wetland (returning farmland to lake) project | YES | YES | YES |
--GS612 Wetland ecological compensation mechanism | YES | YES | NA |
--GS613 No fishing season subsidy | YES | YES | YES |
GS7 Green development project | YES | YES | YES |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Feng, J.; Zhao, Z.; Wen, Y.; Hou, Y. Organically Linking Green Development and Ecological Environment Protection in Poyang Lake, China Using a Social-Ecological System (SES) Framework. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 2572. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052572
Feng J, Zhao Z, Wen Y, Hou Y. Organically Linking Green Development and Ecological Environment Protection in Poyang Lake, China Using a Social-Ecological System (SES) Framework. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(5):2572. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052572
Chicago/Turabian StyleFeng, Ji, Zheng Zhao, Yali Wen, and Yilei Hou. 2021. "Organically Linking Green Development and Ecological Environment Protection in Poyang Lake, China Using a Social-Ecological System (SES) Framework" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 5: 2572. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052572