Quality of Life and Associated Factors in Young Workers
Abstract
:1. Background
2. Methods
2.1. Study Design and Population
2.2. Data Collection
2.2.1. Procedure
2.2.2. Instruments and Measurement Variables
2.3. Statistical Analysis
2.4. Ethical Considerations
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
References
- Pire, A.C.T. Application and Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of the EUROHIS-QOL 8-Item Index in a Brazilian Sample. Master’s Thesis, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Power, M. Development of a common instrument for quality of life. In EUROHIS: Developing Common Instruments for Health Surveys; Nosikov, A., Gudex, C., Eds.; ISO Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2003; pp. 145–164. Available online: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0015/101193/WA9502003EU.pdf (accessed on 21 September 2020).
- Campos, M.O.; Neto, J.F.R. Quality of life: An instrument for health promotion. Sci. Collect. Health 2008, 9, 232–239. [Google Scholar]
- Gill, D.P.; Blunt, W.; Boa Sorte Silva, N.C.; Stiller-Moldovan, C.; Zou, G.Y.; Petrella, R.J. The HealtheStepsTM lifestyle prescription program to improve physical activity and modifiable risk factors for chronic disease: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health 2019, 19, 841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Da Oliveira, L.S.S.C.B.; Souza, E.C.; Rodrigues, R.A.S.; Fett, C.A.; Piva, A.B. The effects of physical activity on anxiety, depression, and quality of life in elderly people living in the community. Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 2019, 41, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sumário_Executivo_RAIS_2019.pdf. Available online: http://pdet.mte.gov.br/images/RAIS/2019/2-Sum%C3%A1rio_Executivo_RAIS_2019.pdf (accessed on 17 November 2020).
- Pie, A.C.S.; de Fernandes, R.C.P.; Carvalho, F.M.; Porto, L.A. Factors associated with presenteeism in industry workers. Rev. Bras. Occupational. Health 2020, 45, e13. [Google Scholar]
- Marques-Duarte, M.S.; da Purity, D.Y. Association between job satisfaction and workers’ quality of life in a public maternity hospital in the far north of Brazil. Rev. Bras. Saúde Materno Infant. 2019, 19, 723–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marcacine, P.R.; de Castro, S.S.; de Castro, S.S.; Meirelles, M.C.C.C.; Haas, V.J.; de Walsh, I.A.P. Quality of life, sociodemographic and occupational factors of female workers. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva 2019, 24, 749–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almeida-Brasil, C.C.; Silveira, M.R.; Silva, K.R.; Lima, M.G.; de Faria, C.D.C.M.; Cardoso, C.L.; Menzel, H.-J.K. Quality of life and associated characteristics: Application of WHOQOL-BREF in the context of Primary Health Care. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva 2017, 22, 1705–1716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flor, L.S.; Wilson, S.; Bhatt, P.; Bryant, M.; Burnett, A.; Camarda, J.N.; Chakravarthy, V.; Chandrashekhar, C.; Chaudhury, N.; Cimini, C.; et al. Community-based interventions for detection and management of diabetes and hypertension in underserved communities: A mixed-methods evaluation in Brazil, India, South Africa and the USA. BMJ Glob Health 2020, 5, e001959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IBGE|Cities@|Bahia|Vitória da Conquista|Panorama. Available online: https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/brasil/ba/vitoria-da-conquista/panorama (accessed on 13 January 2020).
- Lifestyle and Leisure habits of Workers in Brazilian Industries: General Report; SESI: Brasília, Brazil, 2009.
- Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics, Organizer. National Health Survey, 2013: Perception of Health Status, Lifestyles and Chronic Diseases: Brazil, Large Regions and Federation Units; Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics—IBGE: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2014; 180p.
- Brazil Criterion—ABEP. Available online: http://www.abep.org/criterio-brasil (accessed on 13 January 2020).
- Brazil. Ministry of Health. Health Surveillance Secretariat. Department of Surveillance of Diseases and Non-Communicable Diseases and Health Promotion. Vigitel Brasil 2017: Surveillance of Risk and Protective Factors for Chronic Diseases by Telephone Survey: Estimates of the Frequency and Sociodemographic Distribution of risk and Protective Factors for Chronic diseases in the Capitals of the 26 Brazilian States and the Federal District in 2017. 1st ed. Brasília, Ministry of Health: Ministry of Health, Secretariat of Health Surveillance, Department of Surveillance of Noncommunicable Diseases and Diseases and Health Promotion. 2018; 118p. Available online: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/vigitel_brasil_2017_vigilancia_fatores_riscos.pdf (accessed on 22 March 2020).
- Matsudo, S.; Araujo, T.; Matsudo, V.; Andrade, D.; Andrade, E.; Oliveira, L.C. International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): Study of validity and reproducibility in Brazil. Phys. Act. Health 2001, 6, 5–18. [Google Scholar]
- World Health Organization. Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. 2010. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK305057/ (accessed on 13 January 2020).
- HEALTH INDICATORS–SISVAN. Available online: http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/cgi/SISVAN/CNV/notas_sisvan.html (accessed on 7 April 2020).
- Ministry of Health. Guidelines for the Collection and Analysis of Anthropometric Data in Health Services. Available online: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/orientacoes_coleta_analise_dados_antropometricos.pdf (accessed on 7 April 2020).
- World Health Organization, Organizer. Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic: Report of a WHO Consultation; WHO technical report series; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2000; 253p. [Google Scholar]
- National Supplementary Health Agency (ANS). Manual of Guidelines for Tackling Obesity in Brazilian Supplementary Health; ANS: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- University of Caxias do Sul. NID Labor Observatory. Annual Bulletin Women and Labor Market; UCS: Caxias do Sul, Brazil, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Dong, W.; Pan, X.F.; Yu, C.; Lv, J.; Guo, Y.; Bian, Z.; Yang, L.; Chen, Y.; Wu, T.; Chen, Z.; et al. Self-Rated Health Status and Risk of Incident Stroke in 0.5 Million Chinese Adults: The China Kadoorie Biobank Study. J. Stroke 2018, 20, 247–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Andrade, G.F.; Loch, M.R.; Silva, A.M.R. Changes in health-related behaviors as predictors of changes in self-perceived health: A longitudinal study (2011–2015). Cad. Public Health. 2019, 35, e00151418. [Google Scholar]
- Peres, M.A.; Masiero, A.V.; Longo, G.Z.; da Rocha, G.C.; Matos, I.B.; Najnie, K.; de Oliveira, M.C.; de Arruda, M.P.; Peres, K.G. Self-rated health in adults in Southern Brazil. Rev. Saúde Pública 2010, 44, 901–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nagelhout, G.E.; Abidi, L.; By Vries, H. How do health and social networks compare between low-income multiproblem households and the general population? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 4967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Muniz, J.O.; Venerable, C.Z. Differentials of labor participation and income by gender and income classes: An investigation on the burden of maternity in Brazil. Dice 2019, 62, e20180252. [Google Scholar]
- Gender, Work and Citizenship: Equal Function, Unequal Wage Treatment. Rev. Estud. Fem. 2018, 26. Available online: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-026×2018000300210&lng=pt&tlng=pt (accessed on 2 December 2020).
- Assunção, A.Á.; Abreu, M.N.S. Factor associated with self-reported work-related musculoskeletal disorders in Brazilian adults. Rev. Saúde Pública 2017, 51 (Suppl. S1). Available online: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102017000200301&lng=en&tlng=en (accessed on 22 December 2020).
- Hafner, M.; Pollard, J.; Van Stolk, C. Incentives and Physical Activity: An Assessment of the Association between Vitality’s Active Rewards with Apple Watch Benefit and Sustained Physical Activity Improvements. RAND Corporation. 2018. Available online: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2870.html (accessed on 30 March 2020).
- Klein, S.K.; Fofonka, A.; Hirdes, A.; Jacob, M.H.V.M. Quality of life and physical activity levels of residents of therapeutic residences in southern Brazil. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva 2018, 23, 1521–1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bicalho, P.G.; Géa-Horta, T.; Moreira, A.D.; Gazzinelli, A.; Velasquez-Melendez, G. Association between sociodemographic and health-related factors with the practice of walking in rural areas. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva 2018, 23, 1323–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Freitas, M.C.; Campos, T.D.; Gil, C.A. Expectations and conceptions of work in old age in middle-aged men. Estud. Interdiscip. Psicol. 2017, 8, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shockey, T.M.; Zack, M.; Sussell, A. Health-related quality of life among US workers: Variability across occupation groups. Am. J. Public Health 2017, 107, 1316–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Melo, D.M.; Falsarella, G.R.; Neri, A.L. Self-rated health, social involvement and frailty in elderly outpatients. Rev. Bras. Geriatr. E Gerontol. 2014, 17, 471–484. [Google Scholar]
- Bonita, R.; Beaglehole, R.; Kjellström, T. Basic Epidemiology, 2nd ed.; Livraria Santos Editora Comércio e Importação Ltd.: SãoPaulo, Brazil, 2010; Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/43541/9788572888394_eng.pdf?sequence=5&isAllowed=y (accessed on 11 April 2020).
Variable | n | % |
---|---|---|
Gender Male | 1019 | 80.0 |
Female | 251 | 20.0 |
Age Group Up to 29 years | 469 | 36.9 |
30–39 years | 492 | 38.8 |
40–49 years | 217 | 17.1 |
50 years or above | 92 | 7.2 |
Socioeconomic Class ** A + B1 + B2 | 465 | 36.6 |
C1 + C2 | 629 | 49.5 |
D + E | 176 | 13.9 |
Marital Status * Married or Living Together | 789 | 62.2 |
Single/Divorced/Widowed | 480 | 37.8 |
Work Shift * Daytime | 1014 | 81.0 |
Nighttime/Daytime and Nighttime/Nighttime on duty | 238 | 19.0 |
Self-Rated Health * Very good | 170 | 13.4 |
Good | 645 | 50.8 |
Regular/Poor/Very poor | 454 | 35.8 |
Nutritional Status * Non-obese | 1051 | 85.2 |
Obese | 183 | 14.8 |
Eating * Healthy eating | 523 | 44.0 |
Unhealthy eating | 665 | 56.0 |
Tobacco Use * Yes | 107 | 8.4 |
No | 1162 | 91.6 |
Risky Alcohol Consumption Yes | 364 | 28.7 |
No | 906 | 71.3 |
Physical Activity Active | 791 | 62.3 |
Non-active | 479 | 37.7 |
Quality of Life * Up to 30 | 532 | 42.1 |
31–32 | 347 | 27.4 |
33 or more | 386 | 30.5 |
Variable | Quality of Life | P |
---|---|---|
Gender Male | 31.11 | 0.000 *3 |
Female | 29.44 | |
Age Group Up to 29 years | 31.05 | 0.011 *2 |
30–39 years | 30.71 | |
40–49 years | 30.13 | |
50 years or above | 31.28 | |
Socioeconomic Class *⁴ A + B1 + B2 | 31.26 | 0.002 *2 |
C1 + C2 | 30.55 | |
D + E | 30.33 | |
Marital Status Married or Living Together | 30.79 | 0.086 *1 |
Single/Divorced/Widowed | 30.76 | |
Work Shift Daytime | 30.81 | 0.652 *1 |
Nighttime/Daytime and Nighttime/Nighttime on duty | 30.68 | |
Self-Rated Health Very good | 33.18 | 0.000*3 |
Good | 31.50 | |
Regular/Poor/Very poor | 28.88 | |
Nutritional Status Non-obese | 30.99 | 0.000 *1 |
Obese | 29.63 | |
Eating Healthy eating | 30.91 | 0.258 *1 |
Unhealthy eating | 30.66 | |
Tobacco Use Yes | 30.44 | 0.329 *1 |
No | 30.81 | |
Risky Alcohol Consumption Yes | 31.23 | 0.000 *1 |
No | 30.60 | |
Physical Activity Active | 31.00 | 0.006 *1 |
Non-active | 30.41 |
Variable | Size Effect | Quality of Life | P | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Men | Women | |||
Age Group Up to 29 years | 0.009 | 31.33 | 29.92 | Gender = 0.000 Age = 0.100 Gender * Age = 0.390 |
30–39 years | 31.09 | 29.26 | ||
40–49 years | 30.41 | 29.15 | ||
50 years or above | 31.60 | 28.00 | ||
Socioeconomic Class ** A + B1 + B2 | 0.010 | 31.77 | 29.82 | Gender = 0.000 SC = 0.004 Gender * SC = 0.861 |
C1 + C2 | 30.83 | 29.12 | ||
D + E | 30.57 | 29.00 | ||
Marital Status Married or Living Together | 0.000 | 31.08 | 29.28 | Gender = 0.000 MS = 0.433 Gender * MS = 0.622 |
Single/Divorced/Widowed | 31.16 | 29.61 | ||
Work Shift Daytime | 0.000 | 31.18 | 29.45 | Gender = 0.000 WS = 0.493 Gender * WS= 0.952 |
Night/Daytime and Night/Nighttime on duty | 30.89 | 29.21 | ||
Self-Rated Health Very good | 0.171 | 33.46 | 32.03 | Gender = 0.000 SRH = 0.000 Gender * SRH = 0.050 |
Good | 31.63 | 30.83 | ||
Regular/Poor/Very Poor | 29.38 | 28.88 | ||
Nutritional Status Non-obese | 0.017 | 31.23 | 29.92 | Gender = 0.000 NS = 0.000 Gender * NS = 0.011 |
Obese | 30.40 | 27.35 | ||
Eating Healthy eating | 0.001 | 31.37 | 29.19 | Gender = 0.000 Eating = 0.926 Gender * Eating = 0.060 |
Unhealthy eating | 30.90 | 29.71 | ||
Tobacco Use Yes | 0.001 | 30.57 | 27.25 | Gender = 0.008 Tobacco use = 0.131 Gender * Tobacco use = 0.385 |
No | 31.17 | 29.48 | ||
Risky Alcohol Consumption Yes | 0.006 | 31.48 | 29.16 | Gender = 0.000 Alcoholism = 0.764 Gender * Alcoholism = 0.200 |
No | 30.93 | 29.50 | ||
Physical Activity Active | 0.006 | 31.38 | 29.42 | Gender = 0.000 PA = 0.208 Gender * PA = 0.137 |
Non-active | 30.66 | 29.48 |
Variable | Β | Model 1 OR (95% CI) | Β | Model 2 OR (95% CI) | Β | Model 3 OR (95% CI) | Β | Model 4 OR (95% CI) | Β | Model 5 OR (95% CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Physical Activity Non-active | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||
Active | 0.288 | 1.33 (1.08–1.65) | 0.262 | 1.30 (1.05–1.61) | 0.275 | 1.31 (1.06–1.63) | 0.271 | 1.31 (1.05–1.64) | 0.279 | 1.32 (1.05–1.66) |
Gender Female | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
Male | 0.634 | 1.88 (1.44–2.47) | 0.702 | 2.02 (1.54–2.65) | 0.633 | 1.88 (1.41–2.49) | 0.611 | 1.84 (1.37–2.48) | ||
Age Group 50 years or above | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
Up to 29 years | −0.043 | 0.95 (0.63–1.47) | 0.053 | 1.05 (0.68–1.62) | −0.054 | 0.94 (0.61–1.48) | −0.071 | 0.93 (0.59–1.46) | ||
30–39 years | −0.132 | 0.88 (0.58–1.32) | −0.053 | 0.94 (0.62–1.44) | −0.103 | 0.90 (0.59–1.39) | −0.121 | 0.89 (0.57–1.37) | ||
40–49 years | −0.494 | 0.61 (0.39–0.96) | −0.393 | 0.68 (0.42–1.07) | −0.361 | 0.69 (0.43–1.12) | −0.372 | 0.69 (0.43–1.11) | ||
Marital Status Single/Divorced/Widowed | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
Married or Living Together | 0.095 | 1.09 (0.88–1.38) | 0.118 | 1.12 (0.89–1.41) | 0.146 | 1.16 (0.91–1.47) | 0.178 | 1.19 (0.93–1.52) | ||
Socioeconomic Class * D + E A + B1 + B2 C1 + C2 | 0.562 0.168 | 1 1.75 (1.27–2.42) 1.18 (0.88–1.59) | 0.509 0.223 | 1 1.66 (1.19–2.31) 1.25 (0.92–1.69) | 0.525 0.244 | 1 1.69 (1.20–2.38) 1.28 (0.94–1.74) | ||||
Self-Rated Health Regular/Poor/Very poor | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
Very good | 2.039 | 7.68 (5.37–11.00) | 2.012 | 7.47 (5.17–10.81) | ||||||
Good | 1.094 | 2.98 (2.34–3.79) | 1.083 | 2.95 (2.31–3.77) | ||||||
Nutritional Status Obese Non-obese | 0.228 | 1 1.26 (0.91–1.72) | ||||||||
Risky Alcohol Consumption No | 1 | |||||||||
Yes | 0.152 | 1.16 (0.91–1.48) |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Andrade Louzado, J.; Lopes Cortes, M.; Oliveira, M.G.; Moraes Bezerra, V.; Mistro, S.; Souto de Medeiros, D.; Arruda Soares, D.; Oliveira Silva, K.; Nicolaevna Kochergin, C.; Honorato dos Santos de Carvalho, V.C.; et al. Quality of Life and Associated Factors in Young Workers. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 2153. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042153
Andrade Louzado J, Lopes Cortes M, Oliveira MG, Moraes Bezerra V, Mistro S, Souto de Medeiros D, Arruda Soares D, Oliveira Silva K, Nicolaevna Kochergin C, Honorato dos Santos de Carvalho VC, et al. Quality of Life and Associated Factors in Young Workers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(4):2153. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042153
Chicago/Turabian StyleAndrade Louzado, José, Matheus Lopes Cortes, Márcio Galvão Oliveira, Vanessa Moraes Bezerra, Sóstenes Mistro, Danielle Souto de Medeiros, Daniela Arruda Soares, Kelle Oliveira Silva, Clávdia Nicolaevna Kochergin, Vivian Carla Honorato dos Santos de Carvalho, and et al. 2021. "Quality of Life and Associated Factors in Young Workers" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 4: 2153. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042153