Next Article in Journal
A Training Proposal to Improve Multidirectional Running Technique in Male and Female Handball Players: A Pilot Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Sext Dissemination: Differences across Nations in Motivations and Associations
Previous Article in Journal
The Use of Online CB-ART Interventions in the Context of COVID-19: Enhancing Salutogenic Coping
Previous Article in Special Issue
Social-Ecological Examination of Non-Consensual Sexting Perpetration among U.S. Adolescents
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cross-Cultural Differences in Sexting Practices between American and Spanish University Students

by
Aina M. Gassó
1,*,
José R. Agustina
2 and
Esperanza Goméz-Durán
3
1
Faculty of Law, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, 08017 Barcelona, Spain
2
Faculty of Law, Universitat Abat Oliba CEU, 08022 Barcelona, Spain
3
School of Medicine, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, 08017 Barcelona, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(4), 2058; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042058
Submission received: 29 January 2021 / Revised: 14 February 2021 / Accepted: 17 February 2021 / Published: 20 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Sexting: Links and Answers)

Abstract

Despite the growing body of research regarding sexting and online sexual victimization, there is little evidence exploring cultural differences in association with those behaviors. The aim of this study was to examine cultural differences in sexting practices by comparing an American sample and a Spanish sample of university students. The original sample was composed of 1799 college students, including 1386 Spanish college students and 413 American Students, with 74% of female participants, and ages ranging from 18 to 64 years old (mean age = 21.26, SD= 4.61). Results indicate that American students sext more than Spanish students and have higher probabilities of being victims of nonconsensual dissemination of their sexual content. However, Spanish students receive more sexts than American students. Although our results show differences between the Spanish and the American samples that might be modulated by cultural factors, the vulnerability of females regarding sexting remains unchanged. Additionally, differences in specific characteristics of the behaviors (such as perceived risk, receiver of the sexual content, intensity of the sexual content, and motive for sexting) were also studied. Further results and implications are discussed in relation to cultural differences.
Keywords: sexting; online sexual victimization; cultural differences; cross-culture sexting; online sexual victimization; cultural differences; cross-culture

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gassó, A.M.; Agustina, J.R.; Goméz-Durán, E. Cross-Cultural Differences in Sexting Practices between American and Spanish University Students. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 2058. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042058

AMA Style

Gassó AM, Agustina JR, Goméz-Durán E. Cross-Cultural Differences in Sexting Practices between American and Spanish University Students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(4):2058. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042058

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gassó, Aina M., José R. Agustina, and Esperanza Goméz-Durán. 2021. "Cross-Cultural Differences in Sexting Practices between American and Spanish University Students" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 4: 2058. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042058

APA Style

Gassó, A. M., Agustina, J. R., & Goméz-Durán, E. (2021). Cross-Cultural Differences in Sexting Practices between American and Spanish University Students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), 2058. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042058

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop