Next Article in Journal
Risk Behaviours Associated with Dating and Relationship Violence among 11–16 Year Olds in Wales: Results from the 2019 Student Health and Wellbeing Survey
Previous Article in Journal
Trends in Incidence and Mortality of Primary Liver Cancer in Lithuania 1998–2015
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Reply

Reply to Seafarers’ Occupational Noise Exposure and Cardiovascular Risk. Comments to Bolm-Audorff, U.; et al. Occupational Noise and Hypertension Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6281

by
Ulrich Bolm-Audorff
1,2,†,
Janice Hegewald
3,4,*,†,
Anna Pretzsch
3,†,
Alice Freiberg
3,
Albert Nienhaus
5,6 and
Andreas Seidler
3
1
Division of Occupational Health, Department of Occupational Safety and Environment, Regional Government of South Hesse, 65197 Wiesbaden, Germany
2
Institute and Outpatient Clinic for Occupational and Social Medicine, University Medical Center Giessen, Justus-Liebig-University, 35392 Giessen, Germany
3
Institute and Policlinic of Occupational and Social Medicine (IPAS), Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
4
Institute of Sociology, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Chemnitz University of Technology, Thüringer Weg 9, 09126 Chemnitz, Germany
5
Competence Center for Epidemiology and Health Services Research for Healthcare Professionals (CVcare), University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), 20246 Hamburg, Germany
6
Department of Occupational Medicine, Hazardous Substances and Public Health, Institution for Statutory Accident Insurance and Prevention in the Health and Welfare Services (BGW), 22089 Hamburg, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Shared first authorship (contributed equally).
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(3), 1188; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031188
Submission received: 16 December 2020 / Accepted: 15 January 2021 / Published: 29 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Occupational Safety and Health)
We are grateful for the insightful comments in [1] regarding our systematic review on the relationship between occupational noise exposure and the risk of arterial hypertension [2] and the implications it may have for seafarers. We agree that the association between occupational noise exposure and the risk of coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction requires further investigation. There is already some evidence for a positive association [3,4,5,6].
We also agree that the associations between occupational noise exposure of maritime workers and the development of hypertension or other cardiovascular diseases, such as coronary heart disease, require further investigation. The fact that noise exposure is not mentioned in existing summaries of occupational cardiovascular risk factors of seafarers [7] and that we could only include one study of seafarers [8] in our systematic review suggests that occupational noise exposure is still overlooked and under-researched in this occupational group. The unique maritime working environment could also provide especially valuable information on the effects of occupational noise exposure on cardiovascular health, as seafarers experience the same environmental noise exposures during their long confinements at sea. We believe that longitudinal studies would be particularly important in this context.
To prevent not only sensorineural hearing loss but also cardiovascular diseases, such as arterial hypertension, occupational physicians and technicians in all affected industries should promote appropriate technical, organizational and personal protective measures to reduce the level of occupational noise exposure.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, U.B.-A. and J.H.; writing—review and editing, U.B.-A., A.N., A.F., A.P., J.H., and A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. David, L.; Brice, L.; Richard, P.; Jean Dominique, D.; Dominique, J. Seafarers’ Occupational Noise Exposure and Cardiovascular Risk. Comments to Bolm-Audorff, U.; et al. Occupational Noise and Hypertension Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6281. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bolm-Audorff, U.; Hegewald, J.; Pretzsch, A.; Freiberg, A.; Nienhaus, A.; Seidler, A. Occupational noise and hypertension risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Dzhambov, A.M.; Dimitrova, D.D. Occupational noise and ischemic heart disease: A systematic review. Noise Health 2016, 18, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Eriksson, H.P.; Forsell, K.; Andersson, E. Mortality from cardiovascular disease in a cohort of Swedish seafarers. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 2020, 93, 345–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Eriksson, H.P.; Söderberg, M.; Neitzel, R.L.; Torén, K.; Andersson, E. Cardiovascular mortality in a Swedish cohort of female industrial workers exposed to noise and shift work. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Skogstad, M.; Johannessen, H.A.; Tynes, T.; Mehlum, I.S.; Nordby, K.C.; Lie, A. Systematic review of the cardiovascular effects of occupational noise. Occup. Med. Oxf. UK 2016, 66, 10–16, Erratum in 2016, 66, 500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Oldenburg, M. Risk of cardiovascular diseases in seafarers. Int. Marit. Health 2014, 65, 53–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jégaden, D.; Le Pluart, C.; Marie, Y.; Piquemal, B. Contribution to the study noise-high blood 58 pressure. Concerning 455 merchant sailors aged 40–55 years. (Contribution à l’étude de la 59 relation bruit-hypertension artérielle. À propos de 455 marins de commerce âgés de 40 à 55 60 ans). Arch. Mal. Prof. 1986, 47, 15–20. [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bolm-Audorff, U.; Hegewald, J.; Pretzsch, A.; Freiberg, A.; Nienhaus, A.; Seidler, A. Reply to Seafarers’ Occupational Noise Exposure and Cardiovascular Risk. Comments to Bolm-Audorff, U.; et al. Occupational Noise and Hypertension Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6281. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 1188. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031188

AMA Style

Bolm-Audorff U, Hegewald J, Pretzsch A, Freiberg A, Nienhaus A, Seidler A. Reply to Seafarers’ Occupational Noise Exposure and Cardiovascular Risk. Comments to Bolm-Audorff, U.; et al. Occupational Noise and Hypertension Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6281. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(3):1188. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031188

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bolm-Audorff, Ulrich, Janice Hegewald, Anna Pretzsch, Alice Freiberg, Albert Nienhaus, and Andreas Seidler. 2021. "Reply to Seafarers’ Occupational Noise Exposure and Cardiovascular Risk. Comments to Bolm-Audorff, U.; et al. Occupational Noise and Hypertension Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6281" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 3: 1188. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031188

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop