Next Article in Journal
Implication of the Sensory Environment in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Perspectives from School
Next Article in Special Issue
Ergonomic Consideration of Sight Shifts between the Microscopic and Macroscopic Environments in Microscopic Dentistry for Inexperienced Operators
Previous Article in Journal
Is Hip Muscle Strength Associated with Dynamic Knee Valgus in a Healthy Adult Population? A Systematic Review
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 18
Issue 14
10.3390/ijerph18147662
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Development of Musculoskeletal Disorders during Undergraduate Dentistry Studies—A Long-Term Prospective Study

by
Martin Kapitán
1,*,
Lenka Hodačová
2,
Eva Čermáková
3,
Stanislav Machač
4,5,
Jan Schmidt
1 and
Nela Pilbauerová
1
1
Department of Dentistry, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, and University Hospital Hradec Králové, 500 05 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
2
Department of Preventive Medicine, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, 500 03 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
3
Department of Medical Biophysics, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, 500 03 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
4
Department of Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, Charles University, Second Faculty of Medicine, and University Hospital Motol, 150 06 Prague, Czech Republic
5
Institute of Sports Medicine, 150 00 Prague, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(14), 7662; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147662
Submission received: 29 May 2021 / Revised: 14 July 2021 / Accepted: 15 July 2021 / Published: 19 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ergonomics in Dentistry)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) frequently occur among dental practitioners and present a significant occupational burden with an early onset in the dentists’ career. This study aimed to analyze the five-year development of self-reported overall MSDs among the dentistry students during the course of their studies and to assess the possible influence of the risk as well as protective factors. The questionnaire inquiry was performed among the first-year dentistry students, regarding the occurrence of MSDs and the presence of potential risk and protective factors. The same students were followed, and they filled in the same questionnaire in the middle and at the end of their studies. A total of 73 dentistry students and 28 general medicine students participated. The occurrence of the overall MSDs statistically significantly increased from 30.1% at the beginning of the first year to 45.2% at the end of the fifth year among the dentistry students. The top-level sport was statistically significantly associated with the higher occurrence of MSDs in the fifth year and with the development of new MSDs between the first and the fifth year. This longitudinal prospective evaluation showed a significant increase in the MSDs occurrence among the dentistry students during their studies.

1. Introduction

Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are defined as a group of diseases with various symptoms affecting different parts of a locomotive system. They manifest mainly with pain, muscle stiffness, restricted range of motions, and decreased muscular strength [1].
There is broad evidence of an association between work-related MSDs [2] and the dentistry profession [3,4,5,6,7]. The occurrence of MSDs among dentists varies between 47% and 93% in different studies [3,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. Several studies among dentistry students showed the early onset of MSDs even during the undergraduate studies, where the occurrence ranged from 39% to 93% [8,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. The comparative studies showed a higher MSDs occurrence in later years of studies than in earlier phases [27,33]. However, these studies compared actual students in different years of dentistry studies. In all the studies, women suffered from MSDs more often than men [3,8,9,14,15,16,20,23,25,26,27,28,29,34,35,36]. The most frequent areas of pain are neck, lower back, shoulders and hands [3,7,14,15,16,17,19,20,23,24,26,27,28,29,32,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42]. The occupational risk factors in dentistry include long-term static asymmetric forced posture, small intensively lighted working field, limited range and spectrum of movements, noise, and psychosocial stress [12,23,35,38,41,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51]. Although the ergonomic recommendations have been developed and their efficacy was proved [52], they seem not to be broadly known [37], or they are ignored in everyday practice [7,45].
The dentistry study program lasts for five years at the Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, the Czech Republic. The first two years consist of preclinical subjects with practical lessons on various simulators and models (a total of 300 teaching hours). The students start their clinical practice in the winter semester of the third year when they acquaint basic workflow of the dental office and train elementary procedures among each other, such as local anesthesia, the rubber dam placement, and taking the intraoral X-rays (a total of 60 teaching hours). During the second half of the studies, i.e., five semesters, the students have clinical practical lessons twice a week at different departments of the dentistry clinic (a total of 975 teaching hours). Concurrently, the dentistry students go through the majority of theoretical subjects and general medicine subjects, similarly to their general medicine colleagues. The total number of teaching hours is higher in the dentistry students.
The education in dental ergonomics consists of one theoretical lecture of three teaching hours in the first year and one dedicated practical lesson with the simulators. During all preclinical and clinical practical lessons, the students are explained and instructed in ergonomic recommendations and encouraged to perform compensation exercises. The dental chairs used during the clinical practical lessons can be rearranged for the left-handed dentist.
As far as the authors are aware, there are no studies in the available literature that would observe the development of self-reported MSDs among one group of dentistry students during the whole length of their studies.
This study aimed to analyze the five-year development of self-reported overall MSDs among the dentistry students during the whole studies and to assess the possible influence of the risk as well as protective factors on the development of musculoskeletal pain in the early stages of the dentistry career.

2. Materials and Methods

The dentistry students at the Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, the Czech Republic, were observed during the whole length of their study, i.e., for five years. All the students admitted to the dentistry studies in the academic years 2014/15, 2015/16, and 2016/17 were invited to participate in this study. The inclusion criterion was the enrollment to the dentistry studies in one of the aforementioned academic years. The exclusion criterion was no previous university study in the same study program. No student met this criterion. Students of general medicine were offered to participate as a control group, with the same inclusion (enrollment to general medicine studies) and exclusion criteria. Another exclusion criterion applied in the further phases of the study was any irregularity in the course of the studies, i.e., individual study plan, repeated year, an internship abroad, etc. Thus, only the students with the regular running and length of the studies were followed.
In the initial phase of the longitudinal prospective evaluation, the participants filled in the questionnaire and were objectively examined using the Spinal Mouse® device (Idiag AG, Fehraltorf, Switzerland). The participation was voluntary; all the respondents signed the informed consent.
The same students were followed during their studies and were asked to fill in the same questionnaire again in the middle of the third study year and at the end of the fifth year. At the same time, they were objectively examined using the Spinal Mouse® device (Idiag AG, Fehraltorf, Switzerland) again.
The questionnaire was developed by the authors based on the Nordic standardized questionnaire [53] and questionnaires used by the authors’ team in a similar study among dentists [23,35]. The same questionnaire was used in our short-term study [27], where a part of the respondents overlapped with the current sample.
The questionnaire consisted of three parts. The first part concerned the personal data, such as gender, age, height, and body weight. The second group of questions followed regarding the MSDs, possible risk and protective factors, ways of dealing with pain, and other opinions related to MSDs. The last part included questions about the intensity of pain in different body regions according to the Nordic standardized questionnaire [53].
The method was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Hospital Hradec Králové (Ref. no. 201410 S04P) and by the Dean of the Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové.
The quantitative data are presented by means and standard deviations, the qualitative data by counts and percentage counts. The differences between the groups were analyzed by Kolmogorov–Smirnov test for the quantitative data and by the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test for the qualitative parameters. The development between the years of study was analyzed by Wilcoxon paired test for the quantitative data and by McNemar test for the qualitative parameters. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the influence of the followed factors on the occurrence and development of self-reported overall MSDs. Cohen’s g and common language effect size (CLES) were calculated and presented as measures of the size of the effect for the results, which were statistically significant and relevant as the defined goals of the study.
The level of statistical significance was set to α = 0.05. NCSS 2019 Statistical Software (NCSS, LLC, Kaysville, UT, USA) was used.

3. Results

A total of 100 dentistry (D) students and 73 general medicine (GM) students entered the first phase of the study. Some of them did not volunteer to continue in the study or were excluded for meeting the exclusion criteria. Finally, 73 dentistry students (73%) and 28 general medicine students (38%) remained.
The gender distribution, age, and body parameters of the participants are presented in Table 1. The values referring to the significance of differences between the three phases of the study and between the study groups are listed.
Table 2 summarizes the presence of the potential risk and protective factors for MSDs among the respondents. There were no statistically significant differences between the study groups in any factor in any study year, as well as no statistically significant differences between the three phases of the study.
Subjective assessment of the general health status of the respondents is summarized in Figure 1.
The development of the MSDs occurrence among the whole groups of respondents is demonstrated in Figure 2. The increase from the first year to the fifth year among the D students was statistically significant (p = 0.041; Cohen’s g = 0.19; CLES = 62.21%). Among the GM students, the increase was not statistically significant (p = 0.15). The differences of MSDs among genders in the dentistry students are described in Table 3. No statistical significances were proven in any of the followed years of studies.
The occurrence of recent pain in different body regions is presented in Table 4. The answers “mild”, “moderate”, and “severe” were joined.
Table 5 shows the ways of solving the pain by the respondents and their perception of the influence of MSDs on their lifestyle and the studies’ influence on MSDs.
A total of 47.9% of the dentistry students (n = 35) declared, at the beginning of their studies, they had known that two-thirds of dentists suffer from MSDs. In contrast, only 3.6% of the general medicine students (n = 1) had had this information. This difference is statistically significant (p < 0.001).
The range of the ergonomic education was considered as sufficient by 80.8% of the dentistry students in the third year (n = 59) and 78.1% (n = 57) in the fifth year, respectively.
The univariate analysis did not find in our sample a statistically significant influence of any factor on the MSDs occurrence or development (increase or decrease), except for the age in the first year, the top-level sport in the fifth year, and the regular sporting activity in the third year. The age of the students statistically significantly influenced the occurrence of MSDs in the first year, but not in the following years of studies. The top-level sport was statistically significantly associated with the higher occurrence of MSDs in the fifth-year students and with the development of new MSDs from the first year to the fifth year. The details about the effects of the followed factors on the MSDs occurrence are shown in Table 6; Table 7 presents the influence of the followed factors on the changes of MSDs (newly developed or disappeared) from the first year to the fifth year of studies.
The results of the multivariate analysis confirmed the statistically significant influence of the age and top-level sport, but not the regular sporting activity, on the MSDs occurrence. Additionally, the multivariate analysis revealed the statistically significant influence of the presence of diseases of the musculoskeletal system in blood relatives on the MSDs occurrence in students in the first year. There was no statistically significant influence of any of the followed factors on the newly developed MSDs found in the multivariate analysis. The detailed results of the multivariate analysis are presented in Table 8 and Table 9.
The analysis of the main problematic body regions concerning MSDs in students and the findings from the physical examination will be published in the following papers.

4. Discussion

This study aimed to investigate the development of MSDs among the dentistry students during the undergraduate studies. The general medicine students were intended to be employed as a control group. A total of 100 dentistry students and 73 general medicine students entered the study. A significant number of the participants did not finish the follow-up because they decided not to continue or were excluded. This decrease happened mainly among the group of general medicine students, where only 28 of them remained. Such a limited group was not sufficient for a planned analysis of the influence of the followed factors on MSDs and couldn‘t function as a control group as was planned. The comparison of both groups was thus made only in terms of the participants characteristics and the presence of the followed factors. Other results of the general medicine students are even though presented to illustrate the overall situation.
The gender distribution was the only statistically significant difference between the dentistry students and the general medicine students. There were many more women among the dentistry students, whereas the general medicine group was more balanced in our sample. This corresponds with the traditional gender distribution among dentists in the Czech Republic. According to the last yearbook of the Czech Dental Chamber, there were 35.1% of male and 64.9% of female dentists [54]. The difference in our dentistry students is even larger; however, the reasons are not known. There were no other differences found between the study group and the control group in personal characteristics nor in the presence of possible risk and protective factors.
There was a statistically significant increase in the occurrence of self-reported MSDs among the dentistry students, from 30.1% at the beginning of the first year to 45.2% at the end of the fifth year. The Cohen’s g of 0.19 indicates a medium size of the effect [55]. The increase among the general medicine students was not statistically significant, even if it was relatively similar, around 50% from the baseline. The small size of the control group probably contributed; thus, the effective comparison of the MSDs development between the D students and GM students is not possible.
We believe that there are two main reasons for the higher rate of MSDs in the general medicine students and for the increase between the first and the fifth year: (i) the general medicine students were less aware of this problem before they came to the university compared with the dentistry students. We assume that people considering dentistry to be their further profession were able to find relevant information and to decide responsibly, i.e., if they already suffer from any musculoskeletal problem, they may more likely choose a different kind of expertise. This might have contributed to a higher rate of occurrence of MSDs among GM students in our study, even in the first year when it could be expected that the students of both groups did not differ in their previous study experience and presence of related risk factors; (ii) as the dentistry students were aware of the MSDs occurrence among dentists, they had a chance to apply preventive matters, which, in combination with a declared sufficient range of ergonomic education, seem to be at least partly successful. Thus, we suggest a conclusion that the initial awareness of the problem, sufficient ergonomic education, and the application of ergonomic recommendations compensated the risk factors involved during the dentistry studies, which led to similar dynamics of the MSDs occurrence increase as in the general medicine students.
The answers to questions about recent pain in different body regions were joined and are presented regardless of the pain intensity. The reason is that quite a small number of the answers were “moderate” and “severe.” In a future study, these data will be analyzed in detail and prepared for publication.
In accordance with other studies among dentistry students and dentists, there were more MSDs in women than in men; however, this finding was not statistically significant in our study. The overall level of MSDs occurrence in the dentistry students was relatively small in comparison with other studies in the literature [8,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. There seem to be several reasons for this positive finding.
The students have spent just a short time on the dental work. During the studies, they work only part time in the phantom labs and the dental offices. Till the end of the studies, they have had only 2.5 years of clinical work behind them. Thus, the risk factors contributing to MSDs in the dentistry profession did not act for a sufficient time.
Another factor was the young age of the students, between 19 and 24 years. Thus, we can presume a sufficient regenerative potential, body flexibility, and adaptability to physical loading. Additionally, most of the factors causing the MSDs in dentists were not yet present, i.e., they could not have played a role yet in the students. According to our study among dentists in the Czech Republic [35], these factors causing musculoskeletal pain were the age, the length of practice, more than 20 patients a day, considering the work as psychically demanding, and the assessment of the general health status as bad/very bad. The majority of the students of both groups considered the studies as psychically demanding. This question was used to identify stress arising from the studies subjectively perceived by the students. The other factors will act later in the dentistry career.
Most students considered the current level of ergonomics education sufficient. They were able to apply the ergonomics recommendations both in preclinical and clinical practice. It might have contributed to a rather smaller occurrence of MSDs among the respondents. In some students, the originally present MSDs even disappeared during the running of the studies. It could have been caused by the initial awareness of this problem in the dentistry occupation resulting in paying more attention to ergonomics during the studies.
The increase in the number of dentistry students solving the pain by exercising between the first and the fifth year was found to be the only statistically significant factor among the ways how students solved MSDs. It is positive that the students almost did not use analgesics; it indicates just a mild intensity of musculoskeletal pain. Another positive finding is that many of the students tend to seek help of a specialist. Four respondents out of the whole sample (101 students) underwent surgery for MSDs, which is quite a lot with respect to young age. Among the Czech dentists in our previous study, 86.9% of them solved the MSDs by exercising, 48.6% used self-prescribed analgesics, 46.7% sought help of a specialist, and 5.8% underwent surgery [23].
The perception of the influence of MSDs on the lifestyle slightly increased in both groups; however, it was not statistically significant. The same trend was observed between the third year and the fifth year in terms of considering the influence of the studies on the occurrence of MSDs.
Almost all students in both groups declared very good or good general health status, only two of them declared satisfactory health status, and no one reported bad or very bad health status. This shows that young people who choose dentistry as their profession are healthy. The reason may be associated with the awareness of the MSDs among dentists discussed above. Good general health, even in the fifth year, could have contributed to the relatively small occurrence of MSDs. A significant influence of self-reported general health status was proved in our study among the Czech dentists, where the perceived satisfactory or bad/very bad general health was the strongest risk factor for MSDs [35].
Out of the followed risk and protective factors, the age and the top-level sport had a statistically significant influence on MSDs according to both univariate and multivariate analysis. The age influenced the occurrence of MSDs in the first year only. As the age of the students was similar, the relevance of this finding is unclear.
As a top-level sport, we understand a sporting activity that is organized in sport clubs, includes regular workouts, practice, matches, and competitions, is performed on a long-term basis, and the athletes are registered by the official, state-controlled body. The top-level sport increased the occurrence of MSDs in the fifth year more than five times, and the risk of the development of new MSDs between the first year and the fifth year more than four times. Thus, it can be recommended not to study dentistry for people doing a top-level sport currently or in the past.
The presence of diseases of the musculoskeletal system in blood relatives influenced the occurrence of MSDs only in the first-year students, whereas later during the dentistry studies, its influence was not statistically significant. This finding is in accordance with our previous study among dentists, which did not prove a statistically significant relationship between this factor and the occurrence of musculoskeletal pain [23,35]. Thus, we assume that diseases of the musculoskeletal system in blood relatives are not a factor that should prevent young people from dentistry studies.
The analysis of the influence of regular sporting activity on the MSDs brought confusing results. The regular sport was found a risk factor of MSDs in the first and the fifth year but without a statistical significance. In the third year, on the contrary, there was a statistically significant decrease in the occurrence of MSDs. This influence was not statistically significant in the multivariate analysis. These contradictory results may have been caused by several reasons, such as inconsistent answers of the respondents, uneven distribution of performing the sporting activities during the seasons of the year, as well as variable volume of demanded study activities in different periods of the academic year. The three phases of the study were carried out in October (the first year), February (the third year), and May (the fifth year). In the scientific literature, there is not a general agreement on the benefits of sporting activities in relation to MSDs among dentists nor dentistry students [12,14,22,23,24,25,27,33,35].
The multivariate analysis was not calculated in the group of students, where the original MSDs disappeared because of its limited size.
The other followed risk factors, which were proved to have an influence on MSDs in dentists, did not show such influence in the case of dentistry students in our study. The reason probably is that some of the factors (work in a forced, unnatural position, small working field, long-term focus on a short distance, etc.) have not acted for a sufficient time yet, as the students have passed only a negligible volume of the clinical practice, compared to the dentists. Some other factors were not yet even present in students, e.g., general health conditions, long working hours, stress from running a private practice, the experience of disease or trauma of the musculoskeletal system, etc.
The noteworthy positive finding is that no respondent smoked during the studies. There were only two smokers in the whole sample of 101 students in the first year, who stopped till the third year. The studies indicate between 8.5% and 17% of smokers among physicians in the Czech Republic [56,57]. Another notable fact is the significant increase in the participants’ weight during the studies. It probably resulted from difficult studies both in dentistry and general medicine with an enormous volume of theoretical knowledge, which the students must learn, and correspondingly lack of time available for physical activities.
The limits of our study arise from the relatively small number of respondents, particularly in the control group. Our faculty is rather small, with the regular number of students admitted to the dentistry study program around 35 every year. Thus, the authors endeavored to increase the sample size by involving students of three subsequent academic years. Almost all of them entered the study; however, some had to be excluded for not regular running of the studies. In the control group, many students left the general medicine studies; others denied continuing in the follow-up. The planned comparison of the MSDs occurrence and development was not possible. Nevertheless, the results show the development of MSDs during dentistry studies and can roughly illustrate the trends among the general medicine students. Even though the control group was not representative, we find it important to follow both groups, as they are similar in terms of other characteristics.
Another limitation is that the data are based on the subjective statements of individual respondents. However, this way of acquiring information is common in similar studies, as being a cheap, fast, and sufficiently reliable method. The consistency of the results is increased by asking the same respondents three times and not comparing the answers of different people, which was the study design of our previous short-time study [27]. The same questionnaire was used.
The advantage of our study is the long-term follow-up of the students during the whole length of their undergraduate studies. As the authors are aware, other up-to-date available studies with similar topic analyzed only the current status at one particular time or compared groups of different students. Another advantage is the investigation of influence of several possible factors on the development of MSDs in the early stage of the dentistry career. We believe the gained data can contribute to better understanding of this development. Additionally, our results can provide a baseline for further research in this field.
Moreover, the results can be effectively compared with our previous study among the Czech dentists [23,35] because the work and living environment are the same, and the study conditions are similar, at least for the younger group of dentists.
Further research of the development of MSDs in the early stages of the dentistry career is necessary. The subsequent follow-up of our sample is planned in the future.

5. Conclusions

Almost half of the dentistry students suffered from MSDs just before graduation.
The occurrence of MSDs among the dentistry students increased significantly from the 1st year to the 5th year of study.
The top-level sport significantly contributed to the occurrence and the development of MSDs. No statistically significant influence of all the other followed factors (gender, height, actual body weight, changes in body weight, general disease, chronic medication, smoking, dominant hand, diseases of the musculoskeletal system in blood relatives, past disease or trauma of musculoskeletal system, regular sporting activities, and considering the studies as psychically demanding) was demonstrated in our sample of the dentistry students.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.K. and N.P.; methodology, M.K. and J.S.; software, E.Č.; validation, M.K., L.H., and J.S.; formal analysis, S.M. and N.P.; investigation, M.K. and S.M.; resources, M.K.; Data curation, E.Č.; writing—original draft preparation, M.K. and L.H.; writing—review and editing, E.Č., S.M., J.S., and N.P.; visualization, L.H.; supervision, N.P.; project administration, L.H.; funding acquisition, M.K. and L.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Charles University‘s program PROGRES Q40/13 and Q40/09.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Hospital Hradec Králové, ref. 201410 S04P.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained in the written form from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The dataset is available upon request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organisation. Musculoskeletal Conditions. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/musculoskeletal-conditions (accessed on 25 April 2021).
  2. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. OSH in Figures: Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders in the EU-Facts and Figures-Safety and Health at Work-EU-OSHA; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hayes, M.; Cockrell, D.; Smith, D.R. A Systematic Review of Musculoskeletal Disorders among Dental Professionals. Int. J. Dent. Hyg. 2009, 7, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Leggat, P.A.; Kedjarune, U.; Smith, D.R. Occupational Health Problems in Modern Dentistry: A Review. Ind. Health 2007, 45, 611–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Puriene, A.; Janulyte, V.; Musteikyte, M.; Bendinskaite, R. General Health of Dentists. Literature Review. Stomatologija 2007, 9, 10–20. [Google Scholar]
  6. Sartorio, F.; Vercelli, S.; Ferriero, G.; D’Angelo, F.; Migliario, M.; Franchignoni, M. [Work-related musculoskeletal diseases in dental professionals. 1. Prevalence and risk factors]. G. Ital. Med. Lav. Ergon. 2005, 27, 165–169. [Google Scholar]
  7. Szymańska, J. Disorders of the Musculoskeletal System among Dentists from the Aspect of Ergonomics and Prophylaxis. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2002, 9, 169–173. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Abbas, S.B.; Qazi, S.R.; Iftikhar, S.; Iqbal, M.U. Musculoskeletal disorders among dentists and dental students. Pak. Oral Dent. J. 2015, 35, 461–465. [Google Scholar]
  9. Abduljabbar, T.A. Musculoskeletal Disorders among Dentists in Saudi Arabia. Pak. Oral Dent. J. 2008, 28, 135–144. [Google Scholar]
  10. Alexopoulos, E.C.; Stathi, I.-C.; Charizani, F. Prevalence of Musculoskeletal Disorders in Dentists. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2004, 5, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Alnaser, M.Z.; Almaqsied, A.M.; Alshatti, S.A. Risk Factors for Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders of Dentists in Kuwait and the Impact on Health and Economic Status. Work Read. Mass 2021, 68, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Alshouibi, E.N.; Almansour, L.A.; Alqurashi, A.M.; Alaqil, F.E. The Effect of Number of Patients Treated, Dental Loupes Usage, Stress, and Exercise on Musculoskeletal Pain among Dentists in Jeddah. J. Int. Soc. Prev. Community Dent. 2020, 10, 336–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bhuvaneshwari, S.; Shveta, J.; Kaur, J.; Soni, P.; Zahra, F.; Jerry, J.J. Assessment of Various Dental Occupational Hazards and Safety Measures among Dentists of Odisha, India. J. Contemp. Dent. Pract. 2020, 21, 1165–1169. [Google Scholar]
  14. Gandolfi, M.G.; Zamparini, F.; Spinelli, A.; Risi, A.; Prati, C. Musculoskeletal Disorders among Italian Dentists and Dental Hygienists. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 2021, 18, 2705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Harutunian, K.; Gargallo-Albiol, J.; Figueiredo, R.; Gay-Escoda, C. Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Pain among Postgraduate Students and Faculty Members of the School of Dentistry of the University of Barcelona (Spain). A Cross-Sectional Study. Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal 2011, 16, e425–e429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Kumar, M.; Pai, K.M.; Vineetha, R. Occupation-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders among Dental Professionals. Med. Pharm. Rep. 2020, 93, 405–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Leggat, P.A.; Smith, D.R. Musculoskeletal Disorders Self-Reported by Dentists in Queensland, Australia. Aust. Dent. J. 2006, 51, 324–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Lindfors, P.; von Thiele, U.; Lundberg, U. Work Characteristics and Upper Extremity Disorders in Female Dental Health Workers. J. Occup. Health 2006, 48, 192–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Morse, T.; Bruneau, H.; Dussetschleger, J. Musculoskeletal Disorders of the Neck and Shoulder in the Dental Professions. Work Read. Mass 2010, 35, 419–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Ohlendorf, D.; Naser, A.; Haas, Y.; Haenel, J.; Fraeulin, L.; Holzgreve, F.; Erbe, C.; Betz, W.; Wanke, E.M.; Brueggmann, D.; et al. Prevalence of Musculoskeletal Disorders among Dentists and Dental Students in Germany. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 2020, 17, 8740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Puriene, A.; Aleksejuniene, J.; Petrauskiene, J.; Balciuniene, I.; Janulyte, V. Self-Reported Occupational Health Issues among Lithuanian Dentists. Ind. Health 2008, 46, 369–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Sharma, P.; Golchha, V. Awareness among Indian Dentist Regarding the Role of Physical Activity in Prevention of Work Related Musculoskeletal Disorders. Indian J. Dent. Res. 2011, 22, 381–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sustová, Z.; Hodacová, L.; Kapitán, M. The Prevalence of Musculoskeletal Disorders among Dentists in the Czech Republic. Acta Med. (Hradec Králové) 2013, 56, 150–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Yi, J.; Hu, X.; Yan, B.; Zheng, W.; Li, Y.; Zhao, Z. High and Specialty-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders Afflict Dental Professionals Even since Early Training Years. J. Appl. Oral Sci. 2013, 21, 376–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. De Carvalho, M.V.D.; Soriano, E.P.; de França Caldas, A.; Campello, R.I.C.; de Miranda, H.F.; Cavalcanti, F.I.D. Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders among Brazilian Dental Students. J. Dent. Educ. 2009, 73, 624–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Diaz-Caballero, A.J.; Gomez-Palencia, I.P.; Diaz-Cardenas, S. Ergonomic Factors That Cause the Presence of Pain Muscle in Students of Dentistry. Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal 2010, e906–e911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Kapitán, M.; Pilbauerová, N.; Vavřičková, L.; Šustová, Z.; Machač, S. Prevalence of Musculoskeletal Disorders Symptoms among Czech Dental Students. Part 1: A Questionnaire Survey. Acta Medica (Hradec Králové) 2018, 61, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Khan, S.A.; Chew, K.Y. Effect of Working Characteristics and Taught Ergonomics on the Prevalence of Musculoskeletal Disorders amongst Dental Students. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2013, 14, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Ng, A.; Hayes, M.J.; Polster, A. Musculoskeletal Disorders and Working Posture among Dental and Oral Health Students. Healthcare 2016, 4, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Rising, D.W.; Bennett, B.C.; Hursh, K.; Plesh, O. Reports of Body Pain in a Dental Student Population. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2005, 136, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Santucci, N.M.; Jellin, J.; Davenport, T.E. Dental and Physical Therapy Faculty Collaborate in Assessing and Educating Dental Students on Musculoskeletal Disorders. J. Dent. Educ. 2021, 85, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Thornton, L.J.; Barr, A.E.; Stuart-Buttle, C.; Gaughan, J.P.; Wilson, E.R.; Jackson, A.D.; Wyszynski, T.C.; Smarkola, C. Perceived Musculoskeletal Symptoms among Dental Students in the Clinic Work Environment. Ergonomics 2008, 51, 573–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Shirzaei, M.; Mirzaei, R.; Khaje-Alizade, A.; Mohammadi, M. Evaluation of Ergonomic Factors and Postures That Cause Muscle Pains in Dentistry Students’ Bodies. J. Clin. Exp. Dent. 2015, 7, e414–e418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Haas, Y.; Naser, A.; Haenel, J.; Fraeulin, L.; Holzgreve, F.; Erbe, C.; Betz, W.; Wanke, E.M.; Brueggmann, D.; Nienhaus, A.; et al. Prevalence of Self-Reported Musculoskeletal Disorders of the Hand and Associated Conducted Therapy Approaches among Dentists and Dental Assistants in Germany. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0241564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hodacova, L.; Sustova, Z.; Cermakova, E.; Kapitan, M.; Smejkalova, J. Self-Reported Risk Factors Related to the Most Frequent Musculoskeletal Complaints among Czech Dentists. Ind. Health 2015, 53, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. ZakerJafari, H.R.; YektaKooshali, M.H. Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders in Iranian Dentists: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Saf. Health Work 2018, 9, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Aboalshamat, K.T. Nordic Assessment of Occupational Disorders among Dental Students and Dentists in Saudi Arabia. J. Int. Soc. Prev. Community Dent. 2020, 10, 561–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Lietz, J.; Kozak, A.; Nienhaus, A. Prevalence and Occupational Risk Factors of Musculoskeletal Diseases and Pain among Dental Professionals in Western Countries: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0208628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Melis, M.; Abou-Atme, Y.S.; Cottogno, L.; Pittau, R. Upper Body Musculoskeletal Symptoms in Sardinian Dental Students. J. Can. Dent. Assoc. 2004, 70, 306–310. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  40. Myers, H.L.; Myers, L.B. “It’s Difficult Being a Dentist”: Stress and Health in the General Dental Practitioner. Br. Dent. J. 2004, 197, 89–93, discussion 83, quiz 100–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Ratzon, N.Z.; Yaros, T.; Mizlik, A.; Kanner, T. Musculoskeletal Symptoms among Dentists in Relation to Work Posture. Work Read. Mass 2000, 15, 153–158. [Google Scholar]
  42. Shrestha, B.P.; Singh, G.K.; Niraula, S.R. Work Related Complaints among Dentists. JNMA J. Nepal Med. Assoc. 2008, 47, 77–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Anghel, M.; Argesanu, V.; Talpos-Niculescu, C.; Lungeanu, D. Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSDs)-Consequences of Prolonged Static Postures. J. Exp. Med. Surg. Res. 2007, 4, 167–172. [Google Scholar]
  44. Bongers, P.M.; Kremer, A.M.; ter Laak, J. Are Psychosocial Factors, Risk Factors for Symptoms and Signs of the Shoulder, Elbow, or Hand/Wrist?: A Review of the Epidemiological Literature. Am. J. Ind. Med. 2002, 41, 315–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Gupta, A.; Ankola, A.V.; Hebbal, M. Optimizing Human Factors in Dentistry. Dent. Res. J. 2013, 10, 254–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Luttmann, A.; Jäger, M.; Griefahn, B.; Caffier, G.; Liebers, F.; World Health Organization. Preventing Musculoskeletal Disorders in the Workplace; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2003; ISBN 978-92-4-159053-2. [Google Scholar]
  47. Nowak, J.; Erbe, C.; Hauck, I.; Groneberg, D.A.; Hermanns, I.; Ellegast, R.; Ditchen, D.; Ohlendorf, D. Motion Analysis in the Field of Dentistry: A Kinematic Comparison of Dentists and Orthodontists. BMJ Open 2016, 6, e011559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Ohlendorf, D.; Erbe, C.; Hauck, I.; Nowak, J.; Hermanns, I.; Ditchen, D.; Ellegast, R.; Groneberg, D.A. Kinematic Analysis of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Loading of Trunk among Dentists in Germany. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2016, 17, 427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Ohlendorf, D.; Erbe, C.; Nowak, J.; Hauck, I.; Hermanns, I.; Ditchen, D.; Ellegast, R.; Groneberg, D.A. Constrained Posture in Dentistry—A Kinematic Analysis of Dentists. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2017, 18, 291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Valachi, B.; Valachi, K. Mechanisms Leading to Musculoskeletal Disorders in Dentistry. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 1939 2003, 134, 1344–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Valachi, B.; Valachi, K. Preventing Musculoskeletal Disorders in Clinical Dentistry: Strategies to Address the Mechanisms Leading to Musculoskeletal Disorders. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 1939 2003, 134, 1604–1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Lietz, J.; Ulusoy, N.; Nienhaus, A. Prevention of Musculoskeletal Diseases and Pain among Dental Professionals through Ergonomic Interventions: A Systematic Literature Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 2020, 17, 3482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kuorinka, I.; Jonsson, B.; Kilbom, A.; Vinterberg, H.; Biering-Sørensen, F.; Andersson, G.; Jørgensen, K. Standardised Nordic Questionnaires for the Analysis of Musculoskeletal Symptoms. Appl. Ergon. 1987, 18, 233–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Czech Dental Chamber. Yearbook ČSK 2020, 1st ed.; Czech Dental Chamber: Prague, Czech Republic, 2021; ISBN 978-80-907891-3-5. [Google Scholar]
  55. Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  56. Štěpánková, L.; Kostelecká, L.; Stejskalová, V.; Kalvachová, M.; Králíková, E. Hospital as a Smoke-Free Workplace. Cent. Eur. J. Public Health 2020, 28, S26–S30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Schneidrová, D.; Malinová, J.; Bartošová, I.; Hynčica, V.; Holá, M. Trend in smoking prevalence and providing brief interventions in employees of the Královské Vinohrady Teaching Hospital and Third Faculty of Medicine of Charles University. Prac. Lék 2018, 70, 85–93. [Google Scholar]
Ijerph 18 07662 g001 550
Figure 1. The declared general health status of the dentistry students (a) and general medicine students (b).
Figure 1. The declared general health status of the dentistry students (a) and general medicine students (b).
Ijerph 18 07662 g001
Ijerph 18 07662 g002 550
Figure 2. The development of MSDs during the running of the studies.
Figure 2. The development of MSDs during the running of the studies.
Ijerph 18 07662 g002
Table
Table 1. Sample characteristics.
Table 1. Sample characteristics.
DentistryGeneral MedicineD vs. GM *
% (n)% (n)
GenderMen27.4 (20)53.6 (15)p = 0.019
Women72.6 (53)46.4 (13)
mean (SD)mean (SD)
Age1st year19.6 (1.11)19.2 (0.42)p = 0.28
Height
-men		1st year181.2 (8.38)181.8 (7.15)p = 0.82
Weight
-men		1st year75.9 (13.45)78.9 (12.67)p = 0.53
1st vs. 3rd: p = 0.00251st vs. 3rd: p = 0.015
3rd year78.8 (13.81)82.1 (15.7)p = 0.53
3rd vs. 5th: p = 0.883rd vs. 5th: p = 0.00094
5th year78.9 (13.7)86.1 (16.7)p = 0.18
1st vs. 5th: p = 0.0141st vs. 5th: p = 0.00077
BMI
-men		1st year23.0 (2.95)23.9 (3.91)p = 0.72
1st vs. 3rd: p = 0.00191st vs. 3rd: p = 0.012
3rd year24.0 (2.72)24.8 (4.90)p = 0.73
3rd vs. 5th: p = 0.893rd vs. 5th: p = 0.0016
5th year24.0 (2.90)26.0 (5.09)p = 0.47
1st vs. 5th: p = 0.0111st vs. 5th: p = 0.0083
Height
-women		1st year167.9 (5.83)167.6 (6.12)p = 0.86
Weight
-women		1st year59.1 (6.42)59.2 (6.83)p = 0.99
1st vs. 3rd: p = 0.471st vs. 3rd: p = 0.040
3rd year59.5 (6.97)61.2 (7.61)p = 0.45
3rd vs. 5th: p = 0.000273rd vs. 5th: p = 0.13
5th year60.8 (7.34)62.0 (8.01)p = 0.41
1st vs. 5th: p = 0.000461st vs. 5th: p = 0.018
BMI
-women		1st year20.7 (2.55)21.1 (2.35)p = 0.75
1st vs. 3rd: p = 0.351st vs. 3rd: p = 0.073
3rd year21.0 (1.99)21.7 (2.35)p = 0.41
3rd vs. 5th: p = 0.00073rd vs. 5th: p = 0.44
5th year21.5 (2.21)22.1 (2.60)p = 0.56
1st vs. 5th: p = 0.000711st vs. 5th: p = 0.022
* The column “D vs. GM” shows the p values for the comparison between the dentistry students and general medicine students.
Table
Table 2. The presence of monitored risk and protective factors among the respondents.
Table 2. The presence of monitored risk and protective factors among the respondents.
1st Year3rd Year5th Year
DGMDGMDGM
% (n)% (n)% (n)% (n)% (n)% (n)
General disease15.1 (11)10.7 (3)15.1 (11)7.1 (2)21.9 (16)25 (7)
Chronic medication24.7 (18)25 (7)23.3 (17)25 (7)16.4 (12)32.1 (9)
Smoking1.4 (1)3.6 (1)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
Dominant hand-right90.4 (66)92.9 (26)91.8 (67)96.4 (27)91.8 (67)96.4 (27)
Diseases of musculoskeletal system in blood relatives45.2 (33)53.6 (15)35.6 (26)39.3 (11)39.7 (29)50 (14)
Past disease or trauma of musculoskeletal system9.6 (7)7.1 (2)19.2 (14)7.1 (2)16.4 (12)21.4 (6)
Top-level sport21.9 (16)14.3 (4)16.4 (12)25 (7)17.8 (13)17.9 (5)
Regular sporting activities78.1 (57)85.7 (24)86.3 (63)96.4 (27)79.5 (58)82.1 (23)
Considering the studies as psychically demanding 97.3 (71)96.4 (27)97.3 (71)96.4 (27)
Table
Table 3. The occurrence of MSDs among male and female dentistry students.
Table 3. The occurrence of MSDs among male and female dentistry students.
MaleFemale
% (n)% (n)p
1st year22.2 (4)32.7 (18)0.56
3rd year38.9 (7)40.0 (22)1
5th year33.3 (6)49.1 (27)0.29
Table
Table 4. The occurrence of recent pain in different body regions regardless of its intensity.
Table 4. The occurrence of recent pain in different body regions regardless of its intensity.
1st Year3rd Year5th Year
DGMDGMDGM
% (n)% (n)% (n)% (n)% (n)% (n)
Head42.5 (31)42.9 (12)34.2 (25)42.9 (12)47.9 (35)35.7 (10)
Neck46.6 (34)50.0 (14)52.1 (38)46.4 (13)61.6 (45)53.6 (15)
Upper back23.3 (17)35.7 (10)32.9 (24)46.4 (13)32.9 (24)28.6 (8)
Lower back42.5 (31)50 (14)47.9 (12)57.1 (16)49.3 (36)67.9 (19)
Shoulders16.4 (12)32.1 (9)23.3 (17)17.9 (5)24.7 (18)28.6 (8)
Elbows2.7 (2)3.6 (1)4.1 (3)7.1 (2)5.5 (4)3.6 (1)
Wrists/hands8.2 (6)10.7 (3)20.5 (15)7.1 (2)26.0 (19)17.9 (5)
Hips/tights13.7 (10)21.4 (6)16.4 (12)7.1 (2)16.4 (12)17.9 (5)
Knees21.9 (16)28.6 (8)27.4 (20)25 (7)24.7 (18)28.6 (8)
Ankles/feet5.5 (4)25.0 (7)4.1 (3)14.3 (4)6.8 (5)7.1 (2)
Table
Table 5. The ways of solving of MSDs and associated influences.
Table 5. The ways of solving of MSDs and associated influences.
1st Year3rd Year5th Year
DGMDGMDGM
% (n)% (n)% (n)% (n)% (n)% (n)
Exercising23.3 (17) *35.7 (10)30.1 (22)39.3 (11)41.1 (30) *46.4 (13)
Analgesics1.4 (1)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)1.4 (1)3.6 (1)
Intervention by a specialist9.6 (7)17.9 (5)6.9 (5)7.1 (2)8.2 (6)3.6 (1)
Surgery0 (0)3.6 (1)0 (0)0 (0)1.4 (1)7.1 (2)
Perceived influence
of MSDs on the lifestyle		5.5 (4)7.1 (2)8.2 (6)10.7 (3)9.6 (7)14.3 (4)
Perceived influence
of studies on MSDs		 15.1 (11)35.7 (10)26 (19)39.3 (11)
* p = 0.019 (for the dentistry students between the first year and the fifth year).
Table
Table 6. The univariate analysis of the influence of the followed factors on the occurrence of MSDs among the dentistry students.
Table 6. The univariate analysis of the influence of the followed factors on the occurrence of MSDs among the dentistry students.
1st Year3rd Year5th Year
OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
Gender (women)1.70 (0.49, 5.92)p = 0.391.05 (0.35, 3.12)p = 0.931.93 (0.63, 5.87)p = 0.24
Age1.94 (1.05, 3.62)p = 0.0111.09 (0.74, 1.59)p = 0.670.94 (0.64, 1.39)p = 0.75
CLES = 60.19%
Height-men1.15 (0.96, 1.39)p = 0.0840.97 (0.86, 1.09)p = 0.571.04 (0.92, 1.18)p = 0.49
Height-women0.95 (0.86, 1.05)p = 0.291.02 (0.93, 1.12)p = 0.631.04 (0.95, 1.14)p = 0.36
Actual weight-men1.05 (0.96, 1.15)p = 0.260.97 (0.90, 1.05)p = 0.411.00 (0.93, 1.07)p = 0.93
Actual weight-women1.00 (0.92, 1.10)p = 0.940.96 (0.88, 1.04)p = 0.281.02 (0.95, 1.10)p = 0.57
Weight increase 0.60 (0.20, 1.81)p = 0.651.30 (0.48, 3.55)p = 0.70
Weight decrease 0.92 (0.25, 3.43)1.88 (0.37, 9.52)
General disease0.45 (0.12, 1.68)p = 0.241.18 (0.31, 4.47)p = 0.801.08 (0.35, 3.29)p = 0.90
Chronic medication2.34 (0.77, 7.11)p = 0.140.56 (0.17, 1.79)p = 0.310.84 (0.24, 2.95)p = 0.79
Dominant hand (right)1.09 (0.19, 6.08)p = 0.920.63 (0.12, 3.38)p = 0.600.81 (0.15, 4.31)p = 0.81
Diseases of musculoskeletal system in blood relatives2.24 (0.81, 6.20)p = 0.121.51 (0.57, 4.01)p = 0.411.55 (0.60, 3.98)p = 0.36
Past disease or trauma of musculoskeletal system0.92 (0.16, 5.15)p = 0.921.17 (0.36, 3.82)p = 0.791.26 (0.36, 4.35)p = 0.72
Top-level sport1.54 (0.48, 4.93)p = 0.471.65 (0.48, 5.73)p = 0.435.36 (1.33, 21.55)p = 0.010
CLES = 74.36%
Regular sporting activities2.17 (0.55, 8.54)p = 0.250.23 (0.05, 0.98)p = 0.0371.31 (0.41, 4.15)p = 0.65
CLES = 71.67%
Awareness of MSDs among dentists1.90 (0.69, 5.25)p = 0.210.64 (0.25, 1.66)p = 0.360.83 (0.33, 2.10)p = 0.70
Considering the range of ergonomic education as sufficient 0.59 (0.18, 1.92)p = 0.390.57 (0.18, 1.73)p = 0.32
CLES = common language effect size.
Table
Table 7. The univariate analysis of the influence of the followed factors on the newly developed and disappeared MSDs among the dentistry students.
Table 7. The univariate analysis of the influence of the followed factors on the newly developed and disappeared MSDs among the dentistry students.
From the 1st Year to the 5th Year
Newly Developed MSDsDisappeared MSDs
OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
Gender (women)1.90 (0.50, 7.20)p = 0.330.64 (0.07, 5.61)p = 0.69
Age0.82 (0.42, 1.59)p = 0.551.10 (0.67, 1.81)p = 0.70
Height-men1.02 (0.88, 1.17)p = 0.830.67 (0.19, 2.32)p = 0.20
Height-women1.06 (0.94, 1.19)p = 0.350.95 (0.80, 1.11)p = 0.49
Actual weight-men0.99 (0.91, 1.08)p = 0.901.02 (0.84, 1.24)p = 0.84
Actual weight-women1.04 (0.94, 1.15)p = 0.431.01 (0.90, 1.13)p = 0.85
General disease0.58 (0.14, 2.32)p = 0.440.23 (0.03, 1.68)p = 0.13
Chronic medication1.19 (0.24, 5.99)p = 0.832.75 (0.36, 21.30)p = 0.33
Diseases of musculoskeletal system in blood relatives1.49 (0.47, 4.69)p = 0.500.58 (0.10, 3.40)p = 0.55
Past disease or trauma of musculoskeletal system2.25 (0.52, 9.67)p = 0.273.43 (0.26, 45.03)p = 0.33
Top-level sport6.21 (1.11, 34.80)p = 0.0250.28 (0.03, 3.07)p = 0.26
CLES = 76.17%
Regular sporting activities2.32 (0.54, 9.90)p = 0.24
Awareness of MSDs among dentists0.81 (0.26, 2.53)p = 0.721.71 (0.29, 10.00)p = 0.55
Considering the range of ergonomic education as sufficient0.88 (0.23, 3.26)p = 0.84
CLES = common language effect size.
Table
Table 8. The multivariate analysis of the influence of the followed factors on the occurrence of MSDs among the dentistry students.
Table 8. The multivariate analysis of the influence of the followed factors on the occurrence of MSDs among the dentistry students.
1st Year3rd Year5th Year
OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
Gender (women)1.37 (0.15, 12.06)p = 0.781.13 (0.18, 7.12)p = 0.905.50 (0.85, 35.71)p = 0.061
Age1.90 (1.01, 3.56)p = 0.0251.21 (0.75, 1.94)p = 0.440.89 (0.56, 1.42)p = 0.62
CLES = 59.88%
Height 0.97 (0.85, 1.10)p = 0.641.08 (0.95, 1.23)p = 0.221.06 (0.94, 1.19)p = 0.32
Actual weight1.03 (0.93, 1.13)p = 0.610.93 (0.84, 1.02)p = 0.100.99 (0.90, 1.07)p = 0.74
Weight increase 0.85 (0.22, 3.27)p = 0.762.31 (0.68, 7.87)p = 0.37
Weight decrease 0.56 (0.12, 2.68)1.72 (0.23, 12.82)
General disease0.89 (0.16, 5.06)p = 0.901.02 (0.10, 10.11)p = 0.991.21 (0.16, 9.14)p = 0.86
Chronic medication2.25 (0.47, 10.71)p = 0.310.38 (0.05, 2.76)p = 0.321.39 (0.15, 13.13)p = 0.78
Dominant hand (right)1.59 (0.20, 12.55)p = 0.660.25 (0.03, 1.98)p = 0.190.35 (0.04, 3.28)p = 0.36
Diseases of musculoskeletal system in blood relatives3.47 (0.99, 12.19)p = 0.0451.50 (0.47, 4.83)p = 0.491.61 (0.52, 4.94)p = 0.41
CLES = 68.62%
Past disease or trauma of musculoskeletal system0.32 (0.03, 3.65)p = 0.331.57 (0.38, 6.50)p = 0.541.58 (0.33, 7.66)p = 0.57
Top-level sport2.83 (0.56, 14.23)p = 0.201.14 (0.28, 4.76)p = 0.855.17 (0.99, 26.94)p = 0.038
CLES = 73.91%
Regular sporting activities2.42 (0.42, 14.13)p = 0.310.21 (0.04, 1.17)p = 0.0631.18 (0.28, 4.92)p = 0.82
Awareness of MSDs among dentists1.26 (0.35, 4.52)p = 0.720.86 (0.26, 2.85)p = 0.810.92 (0.30, 2.87)p = 0.89
Considering the range of ergonomic education as sufficient 0.59 (0.16, 2.29)p = 0.450.49 (0.12, 1.98)p = 0.31
Whole model 1st year p = 0.20, 3rd year p = 0.62, 5th year p = 0.55; CLES = common language effect size.
Table
Table 9. The multivariate analysis of the influence of the followed factors on the newly developed MSDs among the dentistry students.
Table 9. The multivariate analysis of the influence of the followed factors on the newly developed MSDs among the dentistry students.
From the 1st Year to the 5th Year
Newly Developed MSDs
OR (95% CI)
Gender (women)4.16 (0.41, 42.00)p = 0.20
Age0.88 (0.38, 2.07)p = 0.77
Height1.03 (0.90, 1.17)p = 0.70
Actual weight1.03 (0.94, 1.13)p = 0.56
General disease0.36 (0.02, 7.07)p = 0.49
Chronic medication0.51 (0.02, 15.96)p = 0.70
Diseases of musculoskeletal system in blood relatives1.49 (0.38, 5.88)p = 0.57
Past disease or trauma of musculoskeletal system2.46 (0.39, 15.37)p = 0.33
Top-level sport4.28 (0.58, 31.59)p = 0.14
Regular sport activities2.13 (0.35, 12.96)p = 0.40
Awareness of MSDs among dentists0.82 (0.20, 3.41)p = 0.79
Considering the range of ergonomic education as sufficient0.83 (0.17, 4.16)p = 0.82
Whole model p = 0.68.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kapitán, M.; Hodačová, L.; Čermáková, E.; Machač, S.; Schmidt, J.; Pilbauerová, N. The Development of Musculoskeletal Disorders during Undergraduate Dentistry Studies—A Long-Term Prospective Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 7662. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147662

AMA Style

Kapitán M, Hodačová L, Čermáková E, Machač S, Schmidt J, Pilbauerová N. The Development of Musculoskeletal Disorders during Undergraduate Dentistry Studies—A Long-Term Prospective Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(14):7662. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147662

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kapitán, Martin, Lenka Hodačová, Eva Čermáková, Stanislav Machač, Jan Schmidt, and Nela Pilbauerová. 2021. "The Development of Musculoskeletal Disorders during Undergraduate Dentistry Studies—A Long-Term Prospective Study" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 14: 7662. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147662

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop