Next Article in Journal
Differences in Interactions with a Conversational Agent
Next Article in Special Issue
Lung Diffusion in a 14-Day Swimming Altitude Training Camp at 1850 Meters
Previous Article in Journal
Agreement of Three Posturographic Force Plates in the Assessment of Postural Stability
Previous Article in Special Issue
Role of Type and Volume of Recreational Physical Activity on Heart Rate Variability in Men
Open AccessFeature PaperArticle

Influence of Interval Training Frequency on Time-Trial Performance in Elite Endurance Athletes

1
School of Health Sciences, Kristiana University College, 0153 Oslo, Norway
2
Department of Vascular Investigations, Oslo University Hospital—Aker, 0586 Oslo, Norway
3
Section for Health and Exercise Physiology, Inland Norway University, 2624 Lillehammer, Norway
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(9), 3190; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093190
Received: 9 April 2020 / Revised: 28 April 2020 / Accepted: 29 April 2020 / Published: 4 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sport and Exercise for Health and Performance)
Purpose: To determine the impact of interval training frequency in elite endurance athletes. It was hypothesized that two longer sessions would elicit greater performance improvements and physiological adaptation than four shorter sessions at the same intensity. Methods: Elite cross-country skiers and biathletes were randomly assigned to either a high-frequency group (HF group) (5 M, 1 F, age 22 (19–26), VO2max 67.8 (65.5–70.2) mL/kg/min) doing four short interval sessions per week or a low-frequency group (LF group) (8 M, 1 F, age 22 (18–23), VO2max 70.7 (67.0–73.9) mL/kg/min) doing two longer interval sessions. All interval sessions were performed at ~85% of maximum heart rate, and groups were matched for total weekly training volume. Pre- and post-intervention, athletes completed an 8 km rollerski time-trial, maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) test, and an incremental, submaximal exercise test. Results: The LF group had a statistically significant improved time-trial performance following the intervention (p = 0.04), with no statistically significant changes in the HF group. Similarly, percentage utilization of VO2max at anaerobic threshold (p = 0.04) and exercise economy (p = 0.01) were statistically significantly improved following the intervention in the LF group only. No statistically significant changes in VO2max were observed in either group. Conclusions: Two longer interval sessions appear superior to four shorter sessions per week in promoting endurance adaptations and performance improvements in elite endurance athletes. Despite matched training volume and exercise intensity, the larger, more concentrated exercise stimulus in the LF group appears to induce more favorable adaptations. The longer time between training sessions in the LF group may also have allowed athletes to recover more effectively and better “absorb” the training. These findings are in line with the “best practice” observed by many of the world’s best endurance athletes. View Full-Text
Keywords: cross-country skiers; exercise economy; VO2max cross-country skiers; exercise economy; VO2max
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Tønnessen, E.; Hisdal, J.; Ronnestad, B.R. Influence of Interval Training Frequency on Time-Trial Performance in Elite Endurance Athletes. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3190.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop